Once-daily versus multiple-daily gentamicin in empirical antibiotic therapy of febrile neutropenia following intensive chemotherapy.

The clinical efficacy and toxicity of once-daily compared with multiple-daily gentamicin dosing, in combination with azlocillin, were studied retrospectively in febrile neutropenic episodes following intensive chemotherapy. Fifty-two episodes were studied in 28 patients with acute myeloid leukaemia. Reasons for initiation of antibiotic therapy, dose, duration of treatment, organism isolation rates, response, cost comparison and toxicity were studied in the two treatment groups. The main indication for initiation of antibiotic therapy was neutropenic fever without a documented infection (80.8% of episodes). The response rate to once-daily gentamicin dosing and azlocillin was three times higher than to multiple-daily gentamicin dosing and azlocillin (P = 0.0112). The incidence of toxicity was low overall and was slightly but not significantly higher in the once-daily group. In this clinical context once-daily gentamicin at a dose of 7 mg/kg/day is more effective than a multiple-daily dosing regimen but may be more toxic.

Comparison of a beta-lactam alone versus beta-lactam and an aminoglycoside for pulmonary exacerbation in cystic fibrosis.

UNLABELLED: We determined whether a beta-lactam and an aminoglycoside have efficacy greater than a beta-lactam alone in the management of a pulmonary exacerbation in patients with cystic fibrosis. STUDY DESIGN: Azlocillin and placebo or azlocillin and tobramycin were administered to 76 patients with a pulmonary exacerbation caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a randomized double-blind, third-party monitored protocol. Improvement was assessed by standardized clinical evaluation, pulmonary function testing, sputum bacterial density, sputum DNA content, and time to the next pulmonary exacerbation requiring hospitalization. RESULTS: No significant difference was seen between the 2 treatment groups in clinical evaluation, sputum DNA concentration, forced vital capacity, forced expiratory volume in second 1, or peak expiratory flow rate at the end of treatment (33 receiving azlocillin alone and 43 both antibiotics); adverse reactions were equivalent in each group. Sputum P. aeruginosa density decreased more with combination therapy (P =.034). On follow-up evaluation, an average of 26 days after the end of treatment, all outcome indicators had worsened in both groups. Time to readmission for a new pulmonary exacerbation was significantly longer in the group receiving azlocillin plus tobramycin (P <.001). Treatment-emergent tobramycin resistance occurred in both groups and was more frequent with combination therapy. CONCLUSION: We conclude that the combination of a beta-lactam and an aminoglycoside produces a longer clinical remission than a beta-lactam alone and slightly better initial improvement.

Severe acute hand ischemia following an accidental intraarterial drug injection, successfully treated with thrombolysis and intraarterial Iloprost infusion. Case report.

A young woman with acute upper extremity edema and ischemia after intraarterial drug injection is presented. Unsatisfactory results from standard treatment were the reason for changing the therapy to temporary thrombolysis, which led to significant improvement. Some days later severe impairment forced another attempt at applying standard therapy, again unsuccessful. Only after continuous intraarterial infusion of Iloprost, a new improvement occurred and saving of the hand was possible. It became obvious that more effective therapeutic measures ought to be applied when severe hand ischemia following intraarterial drug injection is present.

A randomized trial of high-dose ciprofloxacin versus azlocillin and netilmicin in the empirical therapy of febrile neutropenic patients.

A prospective, randomized trial comparing monotherapy with high-dose ciprofloxacin versus a standard combination regimen of azlocillin and netilmicin in the empirical treatment of febrile episodes in neutropenic patients was performed. One hundred and forty-six patient episodes were randomized, but ten (seven ciprofloxacin and three azlocillin/netilmicin) were considered unevaluable for efficacy, and three episodes were withdrawn due to incorrect randomization or non-neutropenia. Of the remaining 133 episodes, infections resolved without modification of therapy in 25/66 (38%) versus 28/67 (42%) of ciprofloxacin and azlocillin/netilmicin treated groups respectively (P = 0.72). Considering all randomized episodes, therapy was modified in 46/73 (63%) episodes with ciprofloxacin and 39/70 (56%) with azlocillin/netilmicin (P = 0.40). Of 73 patient episodes randomized to ciprofloxacin, 25 (34%) received oral follow-on therapy after a median of three days of intravenous therapy. Infections were microbiologically documented in 31/73 (42%) ciprofloxacin and 32/70 (46%) azlocillin/netilmicin, of which 8/27 (30%) and 14/31 (45%) of evaluable episodes resolved without modification of therapy respectively (P = 0.28). Gram-positive organisms accounted for 78% of all organisms cultured with 36% coagulase-negative staphylococci. Bacteriological eradication was recorded in 18/24 (75%) and 26/29 (90%) evaluable patient episodes treated with ciprofloxacin and azlocillin/netilmicin respectively (P = 0.27). Superinfections were seen in 14% of episodes in both groups, and subsequent infections in 12% ciprofloxacin and 14% azlocillin/netilmicin treated patients. Two patients (one ciprofloxacin and one azlocillin/netilmicin) died within 48 h of randomization, and a further 13 patients (four ciprofloxacin and nine azlocillin/netilmicin) died before resolution of neutropenia. Adverse events were recorded in 9% and 15% of ciprofloxacin and azlocillin/netilmicin treated patients respectively, with skin rash (five ciprofloxacin and four azlocillin/netilmicin), nephrotoxicity (two azlocillin/netilmicin), abnormal liver function tests (two azlocillin/netilmicin), ototoxicity (one azlocillin/netilmicin) and nausea (one ciprofloxacin) being the major events recorded. It was concluded that monotherapy with ciprofloxacin at this dosage is a safe alternative to combination therapy with azlocillin/netilmicin, and has the advantages of twice daily administration, iv and oral presentations, no cross allergy in beta-lactam-hypersensitive patients, and no nephro- or oto-toxicity.

Adverse reactions to prolonged treatment with high doses of carbenicillin and ureidopenicillins.

Charts were reviewed for 63 patients whose chronic pseudomonas osteomyelitis was treated with high doses of extended-spectrum penicillins for prolonged periods. The incidence of untoward drug reactions was significantly higher than expected. Carbenicillin evoked adverse reactions in 22.8% of patients. However, most of these reactions were mild, and a change of drug was required in only 5.7% of cases. No adverse drug reactions were observed with cumulative doses of less than 750 g. In contrast to carbenicillin, the ureidopenicillins were associated with adverse reactions in 67.7% of patients; most reactions were moderate to severe in intensity; a cumulative dose of greater than 250 g produced adverse reactions; and discontinuation or change of therapy was required in 51.6% of cases. The main adverse reactions to both carbenicillin and the ureidopenicillins included rash, drug fever, leukopenia, eosinophilia, thrombocytopenia, and hepatic damage.

Randomized multicentre study of ciprofloxacin and azlocillin versus gentamicin and azlocillin in the treatment of febrile neutropenic patients.

In a randomized multicentre study ciprofloxacin combined with azlocillin was compared with gentamicin and azlocillin for the treatment of febrile episodes in neutropenic patients. In 147 evaluable episodes in 108 patients, 80 patients received ciprofloxacin/azlocillin and 67 received gentamicin/azlocillin. The two treatment groups were comparable in terms of age, underlying diagnosis, and duration of neutropenia. Microbiologically documented infections were the cause of fever in 34 (42.5%) and 29 (43.3%) episodes in the ciprofloxacin/azlocillin and gentamicin/azlocillin groups respectively. At the end of therapy, 46 patients (57.5%) receiving ciprofloxacin/azlocillin showed complete resolution compared with 30 (44.7%) for the gentamicin/azlocillin group (P = 0.14). The clinical response rate for microbiologically documented episodes was 58.8% and 48.3% respectively (P = 0.45). Among the microbiologically documented infections with follow-up cultures available, 24 (92.3%) of 26 isolates from patients receiving ciprofloxacin/azlocillin were eradicated, in comparison with 19 (86.4%) of 22 in the gentamicin/azlocillin group (P = 0.65). There were five superinfections, all in the gentamicin/azlocillin group. Significant resistance to the study drugs was not seen. Of all evaluable patients, including those subsequently withdrawn because of early modification of therapy, there were 12 deaths within the study period; six (6.8%) of these occurred in 88 patients randomized to the ciprofloxacin/azlocillin group, compared with two of 80 (2.5%) in the gentamicin/azlocillin group. Both treatments were generally well-tolerated; one patient in the ciprofloxacin/azlocillin group developed convulsions, probably related to ciprofloxacin. The combination of ciprofloxacin and azlocillin is as effective as gentamicin plus azlocillin and offers a useful alternative for the empirical treatment of febrile neutropenic patients.

Multicenter, randomized trial of ciprofloxacin plus azlocillin versus ceftazidime plus amikacin for empiric treatment of febrile neutropenic patients.

In a multicenter, randomized clinical trial, the efficacy of ciprofloxacin plus azlocillin was compared with that of a standard regimen of ceftazidime plus amikacin for the initial empiric treatment of fever in neutropenic cancer patients. In addition, the efficacy of early conversion from intravenous therapy to orally administered ciprofloxacin was compared with that of continued ceftazidime plus amikacin. Seventy-one oncology patients with 79 episodes of fever and neutropenia were randomly assigned to receive initial empiric antibiotic therapy with either intravenously administered ciprofloxacin and azlocillin followed by orally administered ciprofloxacin (regimen 1, 25 episodes); ceftazidime and amikacin (regimen 2, 30 episodes); or ceftazidime and amikacin followed by oral ciprofloxacin (regimen 3, 24 episodes). Microbiologically documented infections were the cause of fever in 10 (40 percent), seven (23 percent), and nine (38 percent) episodes in regimens 1, 2, and 3, respectively, including six, five, and four episodes of bacteremia. Patient survival was 90 to 92 percent in each regimen; however, some modification of antimicrobial therapy occurred in 65, 44, and 41 percent of surviving patients in regimens 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The rate of clearance of initial bacteremia was 67 percent (four of six) in regimen 1, 100 percent (five of five) in regimen 2 and 50 percent (two of four) in regimen 3. Patients in regimens 1 and 3 were able to convert to orally administered ciprofloxacin in 32 (65 percent) of 49 episodes after a mean of six days of intravenous therapy. Superinfections occurred in 24, 10, and 12 percent of patients receiving regimens 1, 2, and 3, respectively, and occurred similarly for patients receiving orally administered ciprofloxacin, 12 percent (four of 32), and intravenous therapy, 17 percent (eight of 47). Parenteral ciprofloxacin was generally well tolerated. One (4 percent) of 25 patients receiving regimen 1 experienced oto- or nephrotoxicity, compared with eight (15 percent) of 54 patients receiving regimens 1, 2, and 3 (p = 0.15), including three patients who required premature termination of aminoglycoside therapy. Our data suggest that the combination of ciprofloxacin and azlocillin is an effective alternative to ceftazidime and amikacin for the initial empiric therapy of febrile neutropenic patients, is generally well tolerated, and avoids the oto- and nephrotoxicity associated with aminoglycoside use. In addition, a majority of patients could change to orally administered ciprofloxacin alone after six days of parenteral therapy.

A comparison of double beta-lactam combinations with netilmicin/ureidopenicillin regimens in the empirical therapy of febrile neutropenic patients.

In a randomized trial ceftazidime plus piperacillin or azlocillin, and netilmicin plus piperacillin or azlocillin were used as initial empirical therapy in 202 febrile neutropenic episodes. Netilmicin plus azlocillin was the most effective combination with a clinical response rate of 81% in clinically and microbiologically documented infections compared with 63% for ceftazidime plus piperacillin. All of the episodes of Gram-negative bacteraemia treated with azlocillin responded compared with 43% of those treated with piperacillin. Gram-positive organisms accounted for 52% of all bacteriologically documented infections and 40% of the febrile episodes were treated with vancomycin for presumptive or documented Gram-positive infection. Patients treated with netilmicin had significantly more nephrotoxicity than those given the double beta-lactam combinations (14.8% vs 3.5%; P less than 0.05). However, this difference was not shown in those patients who did not receive concurrent vancomycin or amphotericin. The double beta-lactam combinations were associated with more hypokalaemia (58.2% vs. 37.7%; P less than 0.05) and more colonization with yeasts (24% vs. 10.4%; P less than 0.05) but there was no evidence that their use was associated with prolongation of neutropenia. These results indicate that ceftazidime plus a ureidopenicillin would be adequate empirical therapy in situations where the concomitant use of nephrotoxic agents precludes the use of aminoglycoside containing combinations.

Controlled trial of aztreonam vs. tobramycin and azlocillin for acute pulmonary exacerbations of cystic fibrosis.

The efficacy of aztreonam was compared to that of standard therapy consisting of tobramycin and azlocillin in the treatment of acute pulmonary exacerbations of cystic fibrosis in a randomized, open trial. Fifteen patients were randomized to each treatment. Responses were assessed based on changes in pulmonary and clinical scores, white blood cell counts, pulmonary function tests and quantitative bacteriology of sputum which were performed before, every 5 to 7 days during and on the last day of therapy. Patients in both groups responded to therapy and there were no statistically significant differences in changes in the above indicators of response with therapy between the two groups (P greater than 0.05). The incidence of detection of Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates resistant to all three study antibiotics increased with therapy. Side effects were limited to transient elevations of liver enzymes (both groups) and rash and fever in one patient treated with azlocillin. Aztreonam represents effective therapy for pulmonary exacerbations of cystic fibrosis associated with susceptible pathogens.

[Ceftazidime with and without tobramycin versus azlocillin plus tobramycin in the therapy of bronchopulmonary infections in intensive care patients]. / Ceftazidim mit und ohne Tobramycin versus Azlocillin plus Tobramycin in der Therapie bronchopulmonaler Infektionen bei Intensivpatienten.

In a still ongoing open, randomized prospective trial the preliminary data of 50 intensive care patients on artificial ventilation were analysed. The evaluation included clinical and bacteriological efficacy and tolerance of ceftazidime alone or in combination with tobramycin versus azlocillin plus tobramycin. Artificially ventilated patients who had been treated in an intensive care unit for at least five days were selected to enter the study because of a high probability of colonisation with gram-negative bacteria. 16 patients were treated for bronchopulmonary infection with ceftazidime alone, and 17 each were treated with ceftazidime plus tobramycin or with azlocillin plus tobramycin. In the ceftazidime group nine patients were cured and three were improved (75% clinical success). Of the patients treated with ceftazidime plus tobramycin, 11 were cured and one was improved (75% clinical success); one patient died from very severe multiple trauma. In the azlocillin-tobramycin group, six patients were cured and two were improved (57% clinical success). Two patients from this group died from their underlying disease and another died from multiple organ failure due to septicemia.

Clinical pharmacology of extended-spectrum penicillins in infants and children.

Compared with previously available penicillins, piperacillin, azlocillin, and mezlocillin have increased activity in vitro against gram-negative bacilli. After intravenous administration of conventional doses (50 to 100 mg/kg) in children, peak concentrations of these drugs are approximately 70 to 350 micrograms/ml. For piperacillin, azlocillin, and mezlocillin, the half-lives during the beta elimination phase (t 1/2 beta) are approximately 0.5 to 0.75, 0.8 to 1.7, and 0.8 to 1.0 hours, respectively. In patients receiving the higher dosage, particularly of azlocillin, the t 1/2 beta may be prolonged by approximately 20%. A total daily dosage of 300 mg/kg or 9 gm/m2 given in four to six divided dosages should produce peak concentrations of approximately 150 micrograms/ml, and concentrations greater than 16 micrograms/ml for at least 2 hours after each administration. Lower daily dosages are needed in neonates, but precise dosage recommendations cannot be made at this time. Only approximately 60% of piperacillin and approximately 45% of azlocillin are eliminated unchanged in the urine; thus only modest dosage reductions are needed in patients with decreased renal function. In children, adverse effects have been infrequent.

The safety and tolerance of azlocillin.

631 patients treated with azlocillin were evaluated for adverse reactions. Azlocillin doses ranged from 37-714 mg/kg/day (mean 260 mg/kg/day) and duration of treatment ranged from 1 to 276 days (mean 11.1 days). 82% of patients were treated for more than 7 days. 92 (14.6%) experienced systemic and 20 patients (3.2%) experienced local adverse reactions. Hypersensitivity, manifest by drug fever, cutaneous reactions, or eosinophilia occurred in 0.3, 1.8 and 1.1%, respectively. Hypokalemia developed in 0.5% overall and was dose and duration related. Hepatotoxicity occurred in 1.7%, diarrhea in 1.9% and leukopenia in 0.3%. Nephrotoxicity, expressed as elevated serum creatinine, was seen in 0.5%. Bleeding was seen in one group of patients that received cefamandole concomitantly. As these complications were not seen in other patients, these complications are probably due to cefamandole. In comparison with ticarcillin, carbenicillin, piperacillin, and mezlocillin, a similar number and severity of adverse reactions were seen. Although the incidence of certain adverse reactions may be underestimated due to the short duration of therapy, azlocillin appears to be exceptionally safe and well tolerated.