Volixibat in adults with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis: 24-week interim analysis from a randomized, phase II study.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Volixibat is an inhibitor of the apical sodium-dependent bile acid transporter (ASBT) that has been hypothesized to improve non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) by blocking bile acid reuptake and stimulating hepatic bile acid production. We studied the safety, tolerability and efficacy of volixibat in patients with NASH. METHODS: In this double-blind, phase II dose-finding study, adults with ≥5% steatosis and NASH without cirrhosis (N = 197) were randomized to receive volixibat (5, 10 or 20 mg) or placebo once daily for 48 weeks. The endpoints of a predefined interim analysis (n = 80), at week 24, were: ≥5% reduction in MRI-proton density fat fraction and ≥20% reduction in serum alanine aminotransferase levels. The primary endpoint was a ≥2-point reduction in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease activity score without worsening fibrosis at week 48. RESULTS: Volixibat did not meet either interim endpoint; the study was terminated owing to lack of efficacy. In participants receiving any volixibat dose, mean serum 7-alpha-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one (C4; a biomarker of bile acid synthesis) increased from baseline to week 24 (+38.5 ng/ml [SD 53.18]), with concomitant decreases in serum total cholesterol (-14.5 mg/dl [SD 28.32]) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (-16.1 mg/dl [SD 25.31]). These changes were generally dose-dependent. On histological analysis, a greater proportion of participants receiving placebo (38.5%, n = 5/13) than volixibat (30.0%, n = 9/30) met the primary endpoint. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were mainly mild or moderate. No serious TEAEs were related to volixibat. Diarrhoea was the most common TEAE overall and the most common TEAE leading to discontinuation. CONCLUSIONS: Increased serum C4 and decreased serum cholesterol levels provide evidence of target engagement. However, inhibition of ASBT by volixibat did not elicit a liver-related therapeutic benefit in adults with NASH. LAY SUMMARY: A medicine called volixibat has previously been shown to reduce cholesterol levels in the blood. This study investigated whether volixibat could reduce the amount of fat in the liver and reduce liver injury in adults with an advanced form of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Volixibat did not reduce the amount of fat in the liver, nor did it have any other beneficial effect on liver injury. Participants in the study generally tolerated the side effects of volixibat and, as in previous studies, the main side effect was diarrhoea. These results show that volixibat is not an effective treatment for people with fatty liver disease. CLINICAL TRIAL IDENTIFIER: NCT02787304.

A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 1 study of the safety, tolerability and pharmacodynamics of volixibat in overweight and obese but otherwise healthy adults: implications for treatment of non-alcoholic steatohepatitis.

BACKGROUND: Accumulation of toxic free cholesterol in hepatocytes may cause hepatic inflammation and fibrosis. Volixibat inhibits bile acid reuptake via the apical sodium bile acid transporter located on the luminal surface of the ileum. The resulting increase in bile acid synthesis from cholesterol could be beneficial in patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. This adaptive dose-finding study investigated the safety, tolerability, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacokinetics of volixibat. METHODS: Overweight and obese adults were randomised 3:1 to double-blind volixibat or placebo, respectively, for 12 days. Volixibat was initiated at a once-daily dose of 20 mg, 40 mg or 80 mg. Based on the assessment of predefined safety events, volixibat dosing was either escalated or reduced. Other dose regimens (titrations and twice-daily dosing) were also evaluated. Assessments included safety, tolerability, stool hardness, faecal bile acid (FBA) excretion, and serum levels of 7α-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one (C4) and lipids. RESULTS: All 84 randomised participants (volixibat, 63; placebo, 21) completed the study, with no serious adverse events at doses of up to 80 mg per day (maximum assessed dose). The median number of daily bowel evacuations increased from 1 (range 0-4) to 2 (0-8) during volixibat treatment, and stool was looser with volixibat than placebo. Volixibat was minimally absorbed; serum levels were rarely quantifiable at any dose or sampling time point, thereby precluding pharmacokinetic analyses. Mean daily FBA excretion was 930.61 µmol (standard deviation [SD] 468.965) with volixibat and 224.75 µmol (195.403) with placebo; effects were maximal at volixibat doses ≥20 mg/day. Mean serum C4 concentrations at day 12 were 98.767 ng/mL (standard deviation, 61.5841) with volixibat and 16.497 ng/mL (12.9150) with placebo. Total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels decreased in the volixibat group, with median changes of - 0.70 mmol/L (range - 2.8 to 0.4) and - 0.6990 mmol/L (- 3.341 to 0.570), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that maximal inhibition of bile acid reabsorption, as assessed by FBA excretion, occurs at volixibat doses of ≥20 mg/day in obese and overweight adults, without appreciable change in gastrointestinal tolerability. These findings guided dose selection for an ongoing phase 2 study in patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02287779 (registration first received 6 November 2014).

Safety, tolerability and pharmacodynamics of apical sodium-dependent bile acid transporter inhibition with volixibat in healthy adults and patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a randomised placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Pathogenesis in non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) involves abnormal cholesterol metabolism and hepatic accumulation of toxic free cholesterol. Apical sodium-dependent bile acid transporter (ASBT) inhibition in the terminal ileum may facilitate removal of free cholesterol from the liver by reducing recirculation of bile acids (BAs) to the liver, thereby stimulating new BA synthesis from cholesterol. The aim of this phase 1 study in adult healthy volunteers (HVs) and patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) was to assess the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ASBT inhibition with volixibat (SHP626; formerly LUM002). METHODS: Participants were randomised 3:1 to receive once-daily oral volixibat (0.5 mg, 1 mg, 5 mg or 10 mg) or placebo for 28 days in two cohorts (HV and T2DM). Assessments included safety, faecal BA and serum 7α-hydroxy-4-cholesten-3-one (C4; BA synthesis biomarker). RESULTS: Sixty-one individuals were randomised (HVs: placebo, n = 12; volixibat, n = 38; T2DM: placebo, n = 3; volixibat, n = 8). No deaths or treatment-related serious adverse events were reported. Mild or moderate gastrointestinal adverse events were those most frequently reported with volixibat. With volixibat, mean total faecal BA excretion on day 28 was ~1.6-3.2 times higher in HVs (643.73-1239.3 µmol/24 h) and ~8 times higher in T2DM (1786.0 µmol/24 h) than with placebo (HVs: 386.93 µmol/24 h; T2DM: 220.00 µmol/24 h). With volixibat, mean C4 concentrations increased by ~1.3-5.3-fold from baseline to day 28 in HVs and by twofold in T2DM. CONCLUSIONS: Volixibat was generally well tolerated. Increased faecal BA excretion and serum C4 levels support the mechanistic rationale for exploring ASBT inhibition in NASH. The study was registered with the Dutch clinical trial authority (Centrale Commissie Mensgebonden Onderzoek; trial registration number NL44732.056.13; registered 24 May 2013).

F 15845 inhibits persistent sodium current in the heart and prevents angina in animal models.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Activation of the persistent sodium current in ischaemic myocardium results in calcium overload which is toxic for the cardiomyocyte. Thus, the activity of 3-(R)-[3-(2-methoxyphenylthio-2-(S)-methylpropyl]amino-3,4-dihydro-2H-1,5 benzoxathiepine bromhydrate (F 15845), a new selective persistent sodium current blocker, in protecting against the effects of cardiac ischaemia was examined, in both in vitro and in vivo models. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Electrophysiological studies using patch-clamp and conventional microlelectrode techniques, isolated perfused hearts and models of angina in anaesthetized animals were used to assess the protection afforded by F 15845 against ischaemia-induced changes. KEY RESULTS: F 15845 reduced the persistent sodium current activated by veratridine (IC(50) 1.58 x 10(-6) mol.L(-1)). F 15845 blocked voltage-gated human cardiac sodium channels in a novel, voltage-dependent manner, selectively affecting steady-state inactivation. F 15845 did not affect action potential shape and basal function of guinea pig isolated perfused hearts but did reduce ischaemia-induced diastolic contracture in this model (IC(50) 0.64 x 10(-6) mol.L(-1)). In rabbits, F 15845 given i.v. (ED(50) 0.05 mg.kg(-1)) or orally (ED(50) 0.13 mg.kg(-1)) dose-dependently and powerfully inhibited regional myocardial ischaemia-induced ST segment elevation in the absence of haemodynamic effects, implying direct cardiac activity. In dogs, F 15845 dose-dependently inhibited epicardial ST segment changes (70 +/- 8% at 0.63 mg.kg(-1)) in an experimental angina model of demand ischaemia, again without haemodynamic effects, confirming a direct anti-anginal activity. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: F 15845 is a selective, potent blocker of the persistent sodium current, generated by the human Na(v)1.5 channel isoforms, and prevents cardiac angina in animal models.

[Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agent, phase I clinical trial with CN-100--single and repeated oral administration study].

In vivo pharmacokinetics and safety of CN-100, a propionic acid derivative non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), were investigated in 12 healthy male volunteers with single oral administration at a dose of 150 or 300 mg, or repetitive oral administrations at a daily dose of 300 mg. The plasma concentration of CN-100 reached maximum approximately 1.5 hrs. after the administration and disappeared from the body with a half-life of about seven hrs. No cumulative effect was confirmed by the repetitive administration. The in vivo pharmacokinetics of CN-100 were not affected by a meal one hr. prior to the administration. In clinical examinations, slight elevations of GOT and GPT were observed in one case, and slight increase of number of leucocyte was observed in two cases but no other notable subjective symptoms or objective findings were found. Thus, the pharmacokinetic and safety studies of CN-100 concluded that the drug is evaluable in phase II test under thorough examination and control.