Three Candidate Probiotic Strains Impact Gut Microbiota and Induce Anergy in Mice with Cow's Milk Allergy.

Cow's milk allergy is a worldwide public health issue, especially since there is no effective treatment, apart from milk and dairy product avoidance. The aim of this study was to assess the beneficial role of three probiotic strains previously selected for their prophylactic properties in a mouse model of ß-lactoglobulin allergy. Administration of Lactobacillus rhamnosus LA305, L. salivarius LA307, or Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis LA308 for 3 weeks post-sensitization and challenge modified the composition of the gut microbiota, with an increase in the Prevotella NK3B31 group and a decrease in Marvinbryantia, belonging to the Lachnospiraceae family. Although no impact on markers of sensitization was detected, modifications of foxp3, tgfß, and il10 ileal gene expression, as well as plasma metabolomic alterations in the tryptophan pathway, were observed. Moreover, ex vivo studies showed that all probiotic strains induced significant decreases in cytokine production by ß-lactoglobulin-stimulated splenocytes. Taken together, these results suggest that the three probiotic strains tested lead to alterations in immune responses, i.e., induction of a tolerogenic anergy and anti-inflammatory responses. This anergy could be linked to cecal microbiota modifications, although no impact on fecal short-chain fatty acid (SCFA) concentrations was detected. Anergy could also be linked to a direct impact of probiotic strains on dendritic cells, since costimulatory molecule expression was decreased following coincubation of these strains with bone marrow-derived dendritic cells (BMDCs). To conclude, all three candidate probiotic strains induced strain-specific gut microbiota and metabolic changes, which could potentially be beneficial for general health, as well as anergy, which could contribute to oral tolerance acquisition.IMPORTANCE We showed previously that three probiotic strains, i.e., Lactobacillus rhamnosus LA305, L. salivarius LA307, and Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis LA308, exerted different preventive effects in a mouse model of cow's milk allergy. In this study, we evaluated their potential benefits in a curative mouse model of cow's milk allergy. When administered for 3 weeks after the sensitization process and a first allergic reaction, none of the strains modified the levels of sensitization and allergic markers. However, all three strains affected gut bacterium communities and modified immune and inflammatory responses, leading to a tolerogenic profile. Interestingly, all three strains exerted a direct effect on dendritic cells, which are known to play a major role in food sensitization through their potentially tolerogenic properties and anergic responses. Taken together, these data indicate a potentially beneficial role of the probiotic strains tested in this model of cow's milk allergy with regard to tolerance acquisition.

Flow cytometry: a versatile technology for specific quantification and viability assessment of micro-organisms in multistrain probiotic products.

AIMS: Classical microbiology techniques are the gold standard for probiotic enumeration. However, these techniques are limited by parameters of time, specificity and incapacity to detect viable but nonculturable (VBNC) micro-organisms and nonviable cells. The aim of the study was to evaluate flow cytometry as a novel method for the specific quantification of viable and nonviable probiotics in multistrain products. METHODS AND RESULTS: Custom polyclonal antibodies were produced against five probiotic strains from different species (Bifidobacterium bifidum R0071, Bifidobacterium longum ssp. infantis R0033, Bifidobacterium longum ssp. longum R0175, Lactobacillus helveticus R0052 and Lactobacillus rhamnosus R0011). Evaluation of specificity confirmed that all antibodies were specific at least at the subspecies level. A flow cytometry method combining specific antibodies and viability assessment with SYTO® 24 and propidium iodide was applied to quantify these strains in three commercial products. Analyses were conducted on two flow cytometry instruments by two operators and compared with classical microbiology using selective media. Results indicated that flow cytometry provides higher cell counts than classical microbiology (P < 0·05) in 73% of cases highlighting the possible presence of VBNC. Equivalent performances (repeatability and reproducibility) were obtained for both methods. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that flow cytometry methods can be applied to probiotic enumeration and viability assessment. Combination with polyclonal antibodies can achieve sufficient specificity to differentiate closely related strains. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: Flow cytometry provides absolute and specific quantification of viable and nonviable probiotic strains in a very short time (<2 h) compared with classical techniques (>48 h), bringing efficient tools for research and development and quality control.