RESUMO
Scientific societies have the potential to catalyze support for communities that have been historically excluded from science. Many of these societies have formed committees to propose and administer initiatives to promote the career and well-being of their members, with a special emphasis on racial and ethnic minorities. Yet, these societies are rarely armed with data to inform their proposals. Three of the evolution societies (American Society of Naturalists, "ASN"; Society of Systematic Biologists, "SSB"; Society for the Study of Evolution, "SSE") have also formed Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion committees in the last few years. As a first step in determining the needs of the societies, these committees collected data on the demographic characteristics of the societies' constituents by surveying the attendants of the Evolution 2019 meeting. Here, we report the proportions for different demographic groups in attendance at the meeting and compare these proportions to the demographics of recipients of Ph.D. degrees either in evolutionary biology or in the broader life sciences, as well as population demographics of the USA. Our results indicate that historically excluded groups are still underrepresented across US-based evolutionary biology professional societies. We explore whether demographic composition differs at different professional stages and find that representation for women and LGBTQ+ members decreases as the career stage progresses. We also find some evidence for heterogeneity across societies in terms of racial composition. Finally, we discuss the caveats and limitations of our procedures. Our results will serve to inform future efforts to collect demographic data at the society levels, which should in turn be used to design and implement evidence-based initiatives for inclusion and equity. This report should be a starting point for systematic efforts to characterize the ever-changing representation in evolutionary biology and to work toward the inclusion of all groups.
Assuntos
Biologia/organização & administração , Sociedades Científicas/estatística & dados numéricos , Biologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Demografia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Grupos MinoritáriosRESUMO
Curiosity-driven, basic biological research " performed without thought of practical ends " establishes fundamental conceptual frameworks for future technological and medical breakthroughs. Traditionally, curiosity-driven research in biological sciences has utilized experimental organisms chosen for their tractability and suitability for studying the question of interest. This approach leverages the diversity of life to uncover working solutions (adaptations) to problems encountered by living things, and evolutionary context as to the extent to which these solutions may be generalized to other species. Despite the well-documented success of this approach, funding portfolios of United States granting agencies are increasingly filled with studies on a few species for which cutting-edge molecular tools are available (genetic model organisms). While this narrow focus may be justified for biomedically-focused funding bodies such as the National Institutes of Health, it is critical that robust federal support for curiosity-driven research using diverse experimental organisms be maintained by agencies such as the National Science Foundation. Using the disciplines of neurobiology and behavioral research as an example, this study finds that NSF grant awards have declined in association with a decrease in the proportion of grants funded for experimental, rather than genetic model organism research. The decline in use of experimental organisms in the literature mirrors but predates the shift grant funding. Today's dominance of genetic model organisms was thus initiated by researchers themselves and/or by publication peer review and editorial preferences, and was further reinforced by pressure from granting agencies, academic employers, and the scientific community.
Assuntos
Biologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Comportamento Exploratório , Modelos Animais , Pesquisa/estatística & dados numéricos , Distinções e Prêmios , Fundações , National Institutes of Health (U.S.)/estatística & dados numéricos , Publicações/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados UnidosRESUMO
The evolution education experiences of students of color represent an emerging area of research, because past inquiries indicate these students have differential outcomes, such as lower evolution acceptance and severe underrepresentation in evolutionary biology. Religion is often an important support for students of color who are navigating a science, technology, engineering, and mathematics culture that privileges White nonreligious students. For instance, religion helps mitigate the negative effects of racism, but religious students are also more likely to experience conflict when learning evolution. In this nationwide study, we examined the extent to which strong religiosity among students of color can explain their lower evolution acceptance. We surveyed students in 77 college biology courses across 17 states and found that Black/African American students tend to be more religious and less accepting of evolution than any other racial/ethnic identity group and that Hispanic students tend to be slightly more religious and slightly less accepting of evolution than White students. Importantly, we find that religious background is an important factor associated with Black and Hispanic students' lower levels of evolution acceptance. This study suggests that the biology community should become more inclusive of Christian religious students if it wishes to foster inclusive evolution education for Black and Hispanic students.
Assuntos
Biologia , Negro ou Afro-Americano , Hispânico ou Latino , Religião , Estudantes , Negro ou Afro-Americano/estatística & dados numéricos , Biologia/educação , Biologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Hispânico ou Latino/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Estudantes/estatística & dados numéricos , UniversidadesRESUMO
Research suggests there are potential benefits to students when taught by instructors who share the same gender and/or race/ethnicity. While underrepresented students have shown increased persistence and academic performance when they were taught by gender- and/or race/ethnicity-congruent faculty, there is little research that has explored the influence of matching for graduate student teaching assistants (GTAs). Given that science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) GTAs spend a significant amount of time with undergraduates, measurable impacts on student outcomes have the potential to contribute to the success of undergraduates who have been underrepresented in STEM fields. This study evaluated the effects on academic performance of GTA (n = 50) matching for first-year students (n = 976) in an introductory biology lab course at a Hispanic-serving institution. There was no significant difference in academic performance for students who matched with the gender, race/ethnicity, income, and first-generation status of their GTAs. Results were consistent across multiple cohorts of students, after including statistical controls for prior academic performance and other demographic characteristics and accounting for the nested structure of the data. These results suggest there is a need of supporting GTAs to develop more effective teaching practices and to consider effects of GTA matching on other outcomes.
Assuntos
Biologia , Docentes , Estudantes , Biologia/educação , Biologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Docentes/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Fatores Raciais , Fatores Sexuais , Estudantes/estatística & dados numéricos , EnsinoRESUMO
PURPOSE: To identify the 100 most cited research articles on cervical cancer radiotherapy. METHODS: The Web of Science and Scopus databases were searched to identify the 100 most cited articles on cervical cancer radiotherapy as of September 29, 2019. Articles were ranked based on the total citations received from 2 databases. One hundred articles about radiotherapy for cervical cancer were identified. The following important information was extracted: author, journal, year and month of publication, country or region, and radiotherapy technologies. RESULTS: The 100 most cited articles on cervical cancer radiotherapy were published between 1964 and 2016, and the total citations from 2 databases ranged from 3478 to 211, including a total of 49,262 citations as of September 29, 2019. The index of citations per year ranged from 170.4 to 13.1. These articles were from 16 countries or regions, with most publications being from the United States (nâ=â38), followed by Austria (nâ=â15), Canada (nâ=â8), France (nâ=â8) and the United Kingdom (nâ=â7). The International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics produced the most articles (nâ=â42), followed by Radiotherapy and Oncology (nâ=â13), Cancer (nâ=â8) and Journal of Clinical Oncology (nâ=â7). These articles were categorized as original studies (nâ=â86), recommendations (nâ=â5), guidelines (nâ=â5) and reviews (nâ=â4). Of the 100 most cited articles, intracavitary brachytherapy (nâ=â50) and 3-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (nâ=â34) were the most commonly used treatment techniques. CONCLUSION: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report and analysis of the most cited articles on cervical cancer radiotherapy. This bibliographic study presents the history of technological development in external radiation therapy and brachytherapy. Brachytherapy is an indispensable part of radiotherapy for cervical cancer. The International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics is the journal with the most publications related to cervical cancer radiotherapy.
Assuntos
Braquiterapia/métodos , Publicações/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/radioterapia , Áustria/epidemiologia , Bibliometria , Biologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Canadá/epidemiologia , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , França/epidemiologia , Humanos , Oncologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Física/estatística & dados numéricos , Publicações/tendências , Radioterapia (Especialidade)/estatística & dados numéricos , Reino Unido/epidemiologia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologiaRESUMO
Introducción: Actualmente, las universidades españolas fomentan políticas de igualdad de género, entre ellas la Universitat Pompeu Fabra. Las autoridades educativas de la Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud y de la Vida de dicha universidad estaban interesadas en conocer si el resultado académico de sus egresados era similar entre hombres y mujeres. Objetivo: Para conseguir la meta anterior, se planteó un estudio con todas las personas egresadas en la licenciatura de biología, primera titulación que se implantó en la facultad y que tenía una orientación biosanitaria. Sujetos y métodos: Se registraron las calificaciones de todos los egresados de las diez promociones de la licenciatura referentes al expediente final y a cinco asignaturas con características cognitivas diferentes: anatomía, fisiología, genética, bioinformática y bioética. Resultados: Los resultados en todas las variables estudiadas fueron similares entre hombres y mujeres, no existiendo ninguna diferencia significativa. Conclusiones: Los resultados se valoraron positivamente ya que, al haber igualdad entre sexos, no se consideró que fueran necesarias medidas especiales respecto al tema estudiado para fomentar la igualdad
Introduction: Currently, Spanish universities promote policies of gender equality, including the Pompeu Fabra University. The educational authorities of the Faculty of Health and Life Sciences of this university were interested in knowing if the academic result of their graduates was similar between men and women. Aim: To achieve the above goal, a study was planned with all the people graduated from the Biology degree, the first degree that was implemented in the faculty and that had a bio sanitary orientation. Subjects and methods: The qualifications of all the graduates of the 10 undergraduate promotions in the final file and five subjects with different cognitive characteristics were recorded: anatomy, physiology, genetics, bioinformatics and bioethics. Results: The results in all the variables studied were similar between men and women, with no significant differences. Conclusions: The results were positively valued since, as there was equality between genders, it was not considered that special measures were necessary to promote equality regarding academic performance
Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Desempenho Acadêmico , Biologia/educação , Fatores Sexuais , Avaliação Educacional/métodos , Biologia/organização & administração , Biologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Educação Profissionalizante/métodos , Modelos Educacionais , Estudantes/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
Different longstanding and emerging challenges for public health have been identified including population ageing, migration, infectious and non-communicable diseases, the environment and climatic changes, increasing risks of misinformation and chronic underinvestment. The multi- and inter-disciplinary public health approach - including biology, epidemiology, biostatistics, anthropology and public policy - raises the need to train experienced professionals in different fields. The education on these matters is fundamental to ensure the human well-being. In the last years, education in schools of public health is changing in response to new evidence-based knowledge, opportunities for improvement and scientific discoveries. In this manuscript the current scenario of teaching Hygiene in all the Italian degree courses in Biology were reviewed and summarized and the most excellent examples of academic training offer of Public Health for Biologists worldwide were provided and discussed as a source of inspiration for novel Masters and PhD degree programmes in Italy.
Assuntos
Biologia/educação , Currículo , Higiene/educação , Internacionalidade , Saúde Pública/educação , Biologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Educação Profissional em Saúde Pública/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , ItáliaRESUMO
Biological Anthropology studies the variation and evolution of living humans, non-human primates, and extinct ancestors and for this reason the field should be in an ideal position to attract scientists from a variety of backgrounds who have different views and experiences. However, the origin and history of the discipline, anecdotal observations, self-reports, and recent surveys suggest the field has significant barriers to attracting scholars of color. For a variety of reasons, including quantitative research that demonstrates that diverse groups do better science, the discipline should strive to achieve a more diverse composition. Here we discuss the background and underpinnings of the current and historical dearth of diversity in Biological Anthropology in the U.S. specifically as it relates to representation of minority and underrepresented minority (URM) (or racialized minority) scholars. We trace this lack of diversity to underlying issues of recruitment and retention in the STEM sciences generally, to the history of Anthropology particularly around questions of race-science, and to the absence of Anthropology at many minority-serving institutions, especially HBCUs, a situation that forestalls pathways to the discipline for many minority students. The AAPA Committee on Diversity (COD) was conceived as a means of assessing and improving diversity within the discipline, and we detail the history of the COD since its inception in 2006. Prior to the COD there were no systematic AAPA efforts to consider ethnoracial diversity in our ranks and no programming around questions of diversity and inclusion. Departmental survey data collected by the COD indicate that undergraduate majors in Biological Anthropology are remarkably diverse, but that the discipline loses these scholars between undergraduate and graduate school and systematically up rank. Our analysis of recent membership demographic survey data (2014 and 2017) shows Biological Anthropology to have less ethnoracial diversity than even the affiliated STEM disciplines of Biology and Anatomy; nearly 87% of AAPA members in the United States identify as white and just 7% as URM scholars. These data also suggest that the intersection of race and gender significantly influence scholarly representation. In response to these data, we describe a substantial body of programs that have been developed by the COD to improve diversity in our ranks. Through these programs we identify principal concerns that contribute to the loss of scholars of color from the discipline at different stages in their careers, propose other directions that programming for recruitment should take, and discuss the beginnings of how to develop a more inclusive discipline at all career stages.
Assuntos
Antropologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Docentes/estatística & dados numéricos , Grupos Raciais/estatística & dados numéricos , Antropologia/organização & administração , Biologia/organização & administração , Biologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Diversidade Cultural , Humanos , Estados UnidosRESUMO
American Association of Physical Anthropologists (AAPA) membership surveys from 1996 and 1998 revealed significant gender disparities in academic status. A 2014 follow-up survey showed that gender equality had improved, particularly with respect to the number of women in tenure-stream positions. However, although women comprised 70% of AAPA membership at that time, the percentage of women full professors remained low. Here, we continue to consider the status of women in biological anthropology by examining the representation of women through a quantitative analysis of their participation in annual meetings of the AAPA during the past 20 years. We also review the programmatic goals of the AAPA Committee on Diversity Women's Initiative (COD-WIN) and provide survey results of women who participated in COD-WIN professional development workshops. Finally, we examine the diversity of women's career paths through the personal narratives of 14 women biological anthropologists spanning all ranks from graduate student to Professor Emeritus. We find that over the past 20 years, the percentage of women first authors of invited symposia talks has increased, particularly in the sub-disciplines of bioarchaeology, genetics, and paleoanthropology. The percentage of women first authors on contributed talks and posters has also increased. However, these observed increases are still lower than expected given the percentage of graduate student women and women at the rank of assistant and associate professor. The personal narratives highlight first-hand the impact of mentoring on career trajectory, the challenges of achieving work-life satisfaction, and resilience in the face of the unexpected. We end with some suggestions for how to continue to improve equality and equity for women in biological anthropology.
Assuntos
Antropologia , Docentes , Mulheres/psicologia , Antropologia/organização & administração , Antropologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Biologia/organização & administração , Biologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Escolha da Profissão , Docentes/psicologia , Docentes/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Mães/psicologia , Sociedades Científicas/organização & administração , Sociedades Científicas/estatística & dados numéricosRESUMO
While women are generally underrepresented in STEM fields, there are noticeable differences between fields. For instance, the gender ratio in biology is more balanced than in computer science. We were interested in how this difference is reflected in the interdisciplinary field of computational/quantitative biology. To this end, we examined the proportion of female authors in publications from the PubMed and arXiv databases. There are fewer female authors on research papers in computational biology, as compared to biology in general. This is true across authorship position, year, and journal impact factor. A comparison with arXiv shows that quantitative biology papers have a higher ratio of female authors than computer science papers, placing computational biology in between its two parent fields in terms of gender representation. Both in biology and in computational biology, a female last author increases the probability of other authors on the paper being female, pointing to a potential role of female PIs in influencing the gender balance.
Assuntos
Autoria , Biologia , Biologia Computacional , Ciência da Informação , Publicações/estatística & dados numéricos , Biologia/organização & administração , Biologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Escolha da Profissão , Biologia Computacional/organização & administração , Biologia Computacional/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Ciência da Informação/organização & administração , Ciência da Informação/estatística & dados numéricos , Distribuição por Sexo , MulheresRESUMO
SYNOPSIS: The goal of the Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology's Broadening Participation Committee (SICB BPC) is to increase the number of underrepresented group (URG) members within the society and to expand their capabilities as future researchers and leaders within SICB. Our short-term 10-year goal was to increase the recruitment and retention of URG members in the society by 10%. Our long-term 25-year goal is to increase the membership of URG in the society through recruitment and retention until the membership demographic mirrors that of the US Census. Our plans to accomplish this included establishment of a formal standing committee, establishment of a moderate budget to support BPC activities, hosting professional development workshops, hosting diversity and mentor socials, and obtaining grant funds to supplement our budget. This paper documents broadening participation activities in the society, discusses the effectiveness of these activities, and evaluates BPC goals after 5 years of targeted funded activities. Over the past 5 years, the number of URG members rose by 5.2% to a total of 16.2%, members who report ethnicity and gender increased by 25.2% and 18%, respectively, and the number of members attending BPC activities has increased to 33% by 2016. SICB has made significant advances in broadening participation, not only through increased expenditures, but also with a commitment by its members and leadership to increase diversity. Most members realize that increasing diversity will both improve the Society's ability to develop different approaches to tackling problems within integrative biology, and help solve larger global issues that are evident throughout science and technology fields. In addition, having URG members as part of the executive committee would provide other URG members role models within the society, as well as have a voice in the leadership that represents diversity and inclusion for all scientists.
Assuntos
Biologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Sociedades/estatística & dados numéricos , Biologia/tendências , Pesquisadores , Sociedades/tendênciasRESUMO
Abstract:The Revista de Biología Tropical / International Journal of Tropical Biology and Conservation, founded in 1953, publishes feature articles about tropical nature and is considered one of the leading journals in Latin America. This article analyzes document type, language, countries, institutions, citations and -for the first time- article lifespan, from 1976 through 2014. We analyzed 3 978 documents from the Science Citation Index Expanded. Articles comprised 88 % of the total production and had 3.7 citations on average, lower than reviews. Spanish and English articles were nearly equal in numbers, and citation for English articles was only slightly higher. Costa Rica, Mexico, and the USA are the countries with more articles, and the leading institutions were Universidad de Costa Rica, Universidad Nacional, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Mexico and Universidad de Oriente (Venezuela). The citation lifespan of articles is long, around 37 years. It is not surprising that Costa Rica, Mexico, and Venezuela lead in productivity and cooperation, because they are mostly covered by tropical ecosystems and share a common culture and a tradition of scientific cooperation. The same applies to the leading institutions, which are among the largest Spanish language universities in the neotropical region. American output can be explained by the regional presence of the Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute and the Organization for Tropical Studies. Tropical research does not have the rapid change typical of medical research, and for this reason, the impact factor misses most of citations for the Revista, which are made after the two-year window used by the Web of Science. This issue is especially damaging for the Revista because most journals that deal with tropical biology are never checked when citations are counted by the Science Citation Index. Rev. Biol. Trop. 64 (3): 1223-1235. Epub 2016 September 01.
ResumenLa Revista de Biología Tropical/International Journal of Tropical Biology and Conservation, fundada en 1953, publica artículos de fondo sobre la naturaleza tropical y es considerada una de las revistas líderes en América Latina. Este artículo considera tipos de documentos, idioma, países, instituciones, citas y, por primera vez, longevidad de artículos. Analizamos 3 978 documentos entre 1976 y 2014, del Science Citation Index Expanded (base de datos de la Web of Science). Los artículos representan 88 % de la producción total y reciben en promedio 3.7 citas (las revisiones reciben más). Los artículos en español e inglés son casi iguales en número y citas recibidas (ligeramente más en los artículos en inglés). Costa Rica, México y EE.UU. son los países con más artículos y las principales instituciones son: Universidad de Costa Rica, Universidad Nacional (Heredia), Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México y Universidad de Oriente (Venezuela). Los artículos siguen siendo citados, en promedio, durante 37 años. No es de extrañar que Costa Rica, México y Venezuela dominen la productividad y la cooperación, porque están cubiertos en su mayoría por ecosistemas tropicales, comparten una cultura y tienen una tradición de cooperación científica. Lo mismo ocurre con las instituciones líderes, que están entre las mayores universidades de lengua española en la región neotropical. La alta producción estadounidense se explica por la presencia regional del Instituto Smithsoniano de Investigaciones Tropicales y la Organización para Estudios Tropicales. La investigación tropical no tiene el rápido avance típico de la investigación médica, por lo que el factor de impacto falla al dejar por fuera la mayor parte de las citas que recibe la Revista, las cuales se producen después de los dos años que cubre Web of Science. Esto es particularmente desventajoso, porque Science Citation Index Expanded, al contar las citas, no revisa la mayoría de las revistas que se ocupan de la biología tropical.
Assuntos
Humanos , Publicações Periódicas como Assunto/estatística & dados numéricos , Biologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Bibliometria , Autoria , Fatores de Tempo , Bases de Dados Bibliográficas/estatística & dados numéricos , Costa Rica , IdiomaRESUMO
ResumenEl estudio de la actividad de una revista resulta esencial para conocer la evolución de sus características a lo largo del tiempo. En este trabajo se realiza un análisis bibliométrico de la Revista de Biología Tropical, utilizando como fuente la base de datos Web of Science (ThomsonReuters), entre los años 2003-2012. El objetivo del trabajo es describir las principales características de la producción de la revista y analizar el desarrollo de la colaboración y el impacto en la última década. Se estudia la colaboración entre autores, instituciones y países y su vinculación con las citas recibidas. Se han obtenido indicadores de producción (número de documentos por año, institución y país), colaboración (índice de co-autoría, colaboración entre centros y países) e impacto (factor de impacto, posición en el Journal Citation Report, citas recibidas). Los resultados muestran que en el período estudiado la revista ha publicado 1 473 artículos. Predominan los documentos en inglés y español -por partes iguales- y los principales países de procedencia son México, Costa Rica, Venezuela y Colombia. La Universidad de Costa Rica es la institución que produce la mayor parte de los artículos, con un 17 % de los documentos, seguida de la Universidad Autónoma de México y la Universidad de Puerto Rico. Se evidencia que la colaboración entre autores, instituciones y países ha crecido constantemente en la última década. El índice de coautoría ha sido de 3.07 autores por documento. Un 63 % de las publicaciones se han realizado en colaboración entre 2 o más instituciones y un 22 % en colaboración internacional. Las relaciones de colaboración más frecuentes se producen entre Costa Rica y Estados Unidos. En cuanto al impacto de la revista, dentro de la categoría Biology el factor de impacto ha tenido oscilaciones, alcanzando su máximo valor en 2012 (FI JCR = 0.553). Se ha detectado que el 10 % de los documentos más citados concentra la mitad de las citas recibidas por la revista y tienen un porcentaje de colaboración internacional muy superior a la media de la revista. Los principales países usuarios fueron Estados Unidos, Brasil, México, Argentina y Costa Rica, de quienes proviene la mayor citación de la revista. Los datos muestran una tendencia creciente a la colaboración entre autores, instituciones y países y una relación directa entre el incremento de esta colaboración y el impacto recibido.
Abstract:The activity analysis of a scientific journal is relevant to know the evolution of its characteristics over time. In this paper, results of a bibliometric study of the Revista de Biología Tropical/International Journal of Tropical Biology and Conservation (Costa Rica) are presented. The goal of this study was to describe the main characteristics of its scientific production, and analyze its level of collaboration and its impact between the years 2003-2012. Data was derived from the Web of Science (Thomson-Reuters), and the relationship among authors and coauthors, institutions and countries, and their links with the citations received were analyzed for that period. Descriptive statistics about production (number of documents per year, institution and country), collaboration (authorship index, collaboration among institutions and countries) and impact (IF, position in JCR and number of citations received) were collected. Results showed that the journal has published 1 473 papers in this period, in similar proportions English and Spanish. Mexico, Costa Rica, Venezuela and Colombia are the most common countries of origin, with the Universidad of Costa Rica, Universidad Autónoma de Mexico and the University of Puerto Rico as the most common leader institutions. Collaboration between authors, institutions and countries has shown an increasing trend over the last decade. The co-author index was 3.07 per document, 63 % of publications included 2 or more institutions, and 22 % of the papers were product of international collaboration. The most common collaboration link was between Costa Rica and the United States of America. The impact factor has been oscillating during this last decade, reaching a maximum in 2012 (IF JCR = 0.553). Besides, 10 % of the most cited papers concentrated half of the citations received by the journal, and have a very high number of citations, compared with the journal mean. The main countries that cite the journal were USA, Brazil, Mexico, Argentina and Costa Rica. Data showed an increasing collaboration between authors, institutions and countries, and a direct relationship between the increase of this collaboration and the received impact.
Assuntos
Humanos , Publicações Periódicas como Assunto/estatística & dados numéricos , Biologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Bibliometria , Autoria , Costa RicaRESUMO
The activity analysis of a scientific journal is relevant to know the evolution of its characteristics over time. In this paper, results of a bibliometric study of the Revista de Biología Tropical/International Journal of Tropical Biology and Conservation (Costa Rica) are presented. The goal of this study was to describe the main characteristics of its scientific production, and analyze its level of collaboration and its impact between the years 2003-2012. Data was derived from the Web of Science (Thomson-Reuters), and the relationship among authors and coauthors, institutions and countries, and their links with the citations received were analyzed for that period. Descriptive statistics about production (number of documents per year, institution and country), collaboration (authorship index, collaboration among institutions and countries) and impact (IF, position in JCR and number of citations received) were collected. Results showed that the journal has published 1 473 papers in this period, in similar proportions English and Spanish. Mexico, Costa Rica, Venezuela and Colombia are the most common countries of origin, with the Universidad of Costa Rica, Universidad Autónoma de Mexico and the University of Puerto Rico as the most common leader institutions. Collaboration between authors, institutions and countries has shown an increasing trend over the last decade. The co-author index was 3.07 per document, 63 % of publications included 2 or more institutions, and 22 % of the papers were product of international collaboration. The most common collaboration link was between Costa Rica and the United States of America. The impact factor has been oscillating during this last decade, reaching a maximum in 2012 (IF JCR = 0.553). Besides, 10 % of the most cited papers concentrated half of the citations received by the journal, and have a very high number of citations, compared with the journal mean. The main countries that cite the journal were USA, Brazil, Mexico, Argentina and Costa Rica. Data showed an increasing collaboration between authors, institutions and countries, and a direct relationship between the increase of this collaboration and the received impact.
Assuntos
Bibliometria , Biologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Publicações Periódicas como Assunto/estatística & dados numéricos , Autoria , Costa Rica , HumanosRESUMO
The Revista de Biología Tropical / International Journal of Tropical Biology and Conservation, founded in 1953, publishes feature articles about tropical nature and is considered one of the leading journals in Latin America. This article analyzes document type, language, countries, institutions, citations and for the first time article lifespan, from 1976 through 2014. We analyzed 3 978 documents from the Science Citation Index Expanded. Articles comprised 88 % of the total production and had 3.7 citations on average, lower than reviews. Spanish and English articles were nearly equal in numbers and citation for English articles was only slightly higher. Costa Rica, Mexico, and the USA are the countries with more articles, and the leading institutions were Universidad de Costa Rica, Universidad Nacional, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Mexico and Universidad de Oriente (Venezuela). The citation lifespan of articles is long, around 37 years. It is not surprising that Costa Rica, Mexico, and Venezuela lead in productivity and cooperation, because they are mostly covered by tropical ecosystems and share a common culture and a tradition of scientific cooperation. The same applies to the leading institutions, which are among the largest Spanish language universities in the neotropical region. American output can be explained by the regional presence of the Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute and the Organization for Tropical Studies. Tropical research does not have the rapid change typical of medical research, and for this reason, the impact factor misses most of citations for the Revista, which are made after the two-year window used by the Web of Science. This issue is especially damaging for the Revista because most journals that deal with tropical biology are never checked when citations are counted for by the Science Citation Index.
Assuntos
Bibliometria , Biologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Publicações Periódicas como Assunto/estatística & dados numéricos , Autoria , Costa Rica , Bases de Dados Bibliográficas/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Idioma , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
Observer bias and other "experimenter effects" occur when researchers' expectations influence study outcome. These biases are strongest when researchers expect a particular result, are measuring subjective variables, and have an incentive to produce data that confirm predictions. To minimize bias, it is good practice to work "blind," meaning that experimenters are unaware of the identity or treatment group of their subjects while conducting research. Here, using text mining and a literature review, we find evidence that blind protocols are uncommon in the life sciences and that nonblind studies tend to report higher effect sizes and more significant p-values. We discuss methods to minimize bias and urge researchers, editors, and peer reviewers to keep blind protocols in mind.
Assuntos
Biologia/normas , Coleta de Dados/normas , Biologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Coleta de Dados/estatística & dados numéricos , Mineração de DadosRESUMO
BINABITROP is a bibliographical database of more than 38000 records about the ecosystems and organisms of Costa Rica. In contrast with commercial databases, such as Web of Knowledge and Scopus, which exclude most of the scientific journals published in tropical countries, BINABITROP is a comprehensive record of knowledge on the tropical ecosystems and organisms of Costa Rica. We analyzed its contents in three sites (La Selva, Palo Verde and Las Cruces) and recorded scientific field, taxonomic group and authorship. We found that most records dealt with ecology and systematics, and that most authors published only one article in the study period (1963-2011). Most research was published in four journals: Biotropica, Revista de Biología Tropical/ International Journal of Tropical Biology and Conservation, Zootaxa and Brenesia. This may be the first study of a such a comprehensive database for any case of tropical biology literature.