Failure to investigate anaesthetic anaphylaxis resulting in a preventable second anaphylactic reaction.

We present a case of anaphylaxis to suxamethonium and/or vecuronium in a patient who had previously suffered an anaphylactic reaction, presumably to rocuronium. The patient had not been referred for formal allergy testing after the first anaphylactic reaction. Subsequent formal allergy testing revealed sensitivities to suxamethonium, rocuronium and vecuronium. Her next anaesthetic, using cisatracurium, was uneventful. It is recommended that all patients with suspected perioperative anaphylaxis are referred for testing. This is the responsibility of the anaesthetist. Particular caution should be used with suspected neuromuscular blocking drug allergy as cross-reactivity is common and not predictable by drug structure.

Anaphylaxis during anesthesia: results of a 12-year survey at a French pediatric center.

BACKGROUND: Following adverse reactions to anesthesia, tests are carried out to determine the mechanism of the reaction and to identify the agent responsible. No specific data are available in France concerning such skin tests in children. METHODS: Between 1989 and 2001, we assessed hypersensitivity reactions to general anesthesia in 68 children. Thirty underwent more than one operation, for congenital malformations. Immunoglobulin (Ig)E-mediated anaphylaxis was diagnosed on skin tests combined with the clinical history. RESULTS: Grade I, II and III reactions were observed in 20, 27 and 21 children, respectively. IgE-mediated anaphylaxis was diagnosed in 51 children: 31 (60.8%) for neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBA), 14 (27%) for latex, seven (14%) for colloids, five (9%) for opioids and six (12%) for hypnotics. Vecuronium was the NMBA causing the largest number of reactions. Cross reactivity to NMBA available in France was observed in 23 of 30 children (76%), particularly for vecuronium and atracurium or pancuronium. The estimated frequency of IgE mediated anaphylactic reactions was one in 2100 operations. Based on our results, 25 children subsequently received a different anesthetic with no adverse reaction. CONCLUSIONS: As in adults, NMBA, then latex were responsible for most anaphylactic reactions during anesthesia. Our results confirm that skin tests with anesthetic agents are feasible and safe in children and improve the safety of subsequent anesthetic procedures.

Validation of a flow cytometric assay detecting in vitro basophil activation for the diagnosis of muscle relaxant allergy.

BACKGROUND: Anaphylactic reactions during anesthesia are mainly the result of muscle-relaxant (MR) drugs. Skin tests, serologic detection of specific IgE, and in vitro leukocyte histamine release are used to investigate MR allergy. OBJECTIVE: We describe a new assay that is based on the detection by flow cytometry of the altered expression of plasma membrane molecules of MR-activated basophils. METHODS: For this assay, which we have named the BASIC assay, basophils are incubated in vitro with MR, after which they are fixed and then triple labeled with fluorescein-conjugated anti-CD63, tandem dye R-phycoerythrin-cyanin 5.1 conjugated anti-CD45, and R-phycoerythrin conjugated anti-IgE. The resulting B asophils' A ltered S urface I mmunofluorescence is detected by flow C ytometry (BASIC). RESULTS: Forty-one patients who had an allergic reaction during general anesthesia and 23 control subjects without such a history were studied. All included subjects' basophils were tested in the BASIC assay with at least 4 MR: suxamethonium, gallamine, vecuronium, and pancuronium. After reaction of the basophils of the MR-allergic patients with MRs, increased surface expression of CD63 and CD45 and decreased expression of IgE were detected. Increased expression of CD63 was observed most frequently and it was stronger than the alteration of the 2 other markers. Cross-reactivity between MRs commonly occurred. MRs diluted 10(-1) activate the basophils of the control subjects, suggesting that at relatively high concentrations MRs are also nonspecific basophil activators. CONCLUSION: In the diagnosis of MR allergy, the BASIC assay has a good specificity but a low sensitivity, and it correlates strongly with skin test results. It is currently appraised for the diagnosis of anaphylactic reaction induced by other classes of drugs.

Intraoperative vecuronium anaphylaxis compounded by latex hypersensitivity.

BACKGROUND: Anaphylaxis to latex or muscle relaxant drugs has been demonstrated in the perioperative period but there are no reports of a patient with anaphylaxis to both of these substances. METHODS: We report a patient with meningomyelocele who was initially thought to have anaphylaxis to latex during induction of anesthesia. After recurrence of anaphylaxis following removal of latex as the suspected agent, the muscle relaxant vecuronium was found to be the actual etiology. RESULTS: Skin testing to several muscle relaxants and other anesthetic medications confirmed a hypersensitivity to vecuronium. Skin testing and subsequent physical contact with latex also established a hypersensitivity to this substance. CONCLUSIONS: This report demonstrates the need to scrutinize closely every notation in the anesthesia record when evaluating perioperative anaphylaxis and to consider that hypersensitivity to more than one substance may be present.

Anaphylaxis to muscle relaxants: cross-sensitivity studied by radioimmunoassays compared to intradermal tests in 34 cases.

Thirty-four patients (31 female and three male patients) with a previous anaphylactoid shock to muscle relaxants were investigated. The seric antimyorelaxant IgE was detected by radioimmunoassay (RIA), and the results were compared to intradermal test (IDR) reactions to dilutions of the commercial drugs. The RIA was carried out with a Sepharose-myorelaxant solid phase and anti-IgE 125I-labeled IgG. The results corresponded to the percentage of labeled anti-IgE bound on the solid phase. The RIA with Sepharose-alcuronium and Sepharose-choline was estimated positive from determination with normal sera (n = 12) when bound IgE was greater than 1.0% and 1.5%, respectively. The RIA and IDR were positive in 43.5% and 75%, respectively, of the cases, with a concordance of 66%. One test at least was positive in 79.4% of the cases. No correlation was found between IgE seric levels and the RIA nor between the cutaneous sensitivity and the RIA. Cross-reactivity with Sepharose-choline and Sepharose-alcuronium was observed in 50%, and it was demonstrated by IDR in only 34.2%. The RIA demonstrated the specificity of IgE to quaternary ammonium compounds as myorelaxant drugs. The positive IDR revealed the bridging of mast cell-bound specific IgE, depending on structural conditions, such as the flexibility of the molecules or the variable specificity of the antibodies, restricted to quaternary ammonium ions or enlarged to a broader part of the incriminated molecules.