A qualitative study of a sample of women participating in an Australian randomised controlled trial of intrapartum fetal surveillance.

BACKGROUND: The STan Australian Randomised controlled Trial (START), the first of its kind in Australia, compares two techniques of intrapartum fetal surveillance (cardiotocographic electronic fetal monitoring (CTG) plus analysis of the ST segment of the fetal electrocardiogram (STan+CTG) with CTG alone) with the aim of reducing unnecessary obstetric intervention. It is also the first comprehensive intrapartum fetal surveillance (IFS) trial worldwide, including qualitative examination of psychosocial outcomes and cost-effectiveness. In evaluating and implementing healthcare interventions, the perspectives and experiences of individuals directly receiving them is an integral part of a comprehensive assessment. Furthermore, the added value of using qualitative research alongside randomised controlled trials (RCTs) is becoming widely acknowledged. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine women's experiences with the type of IFS they received in the START trial. METHODS: Using a qualitative research design, a sample of thirty-two women were interviewed about their experiences with the fetal monitoring they received. Data were analysed using thematic analysis. FINDINGS: Six themes emerged from analysis: reassurance, mobility, discomfort, perception of the fetal Scalp Electrode (FSE), and overall positive experience. CONCLUSION: Interestingly, it was found that women who had an FSE in the CTG alone arm of the trial reported very similar experiences to women in the STan+CTG arm of the trial. Despite STan and CTG differing clinically, from women's perspectives, the primary difference between the two techniques was the utilisation (or not) of the FSE. Women were very accepting of STan+CTG as it was perceived and experienced as a more accurate form of monitoring than CTG alone. Findings from this study have significant implications for health professionals including midwives and obstetricians and implications for standard practice and care. The study has demonstrated the importance and significance of incorporating qualitative enquiry within RCTs.

Association between vitamin D deficiency and antepartum and postpartum depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis of longitudinal studies.

PURPOSE: The two previous reviews performed on the association of vitamin D deficiency in pregnancy with antepartum and postpartum depression were limited in reporting forms as they were both systematic reviews and the conclusions were also deemed to be inconclusive. Considering the high prevalence of vitamin D deficiency and depression during and after pregnancy as well as their numerous hazards to pregnancy outcomes, it is of great need to synthesize existing evidence in a more accurate statistical method, so that reliable guidance related to vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy could be provided for clinical decision making. METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the association of vitamin D deficiency with antepartum and postpartum depression. RESULTS: Nine longitudinal studies with 8470 participants were included in the meta-analysis. We found serum 25(OH)D levels < 50 nmol/l was associated with 2.67 times (OR 3.67; 95% CI 1.72-7.85) increased risk of postpartum depression than those 25(OH)D levels ≥ 50 nmol/l, but we did not find a significant association between low vitamin D levels and depressive symptoms during pregnancy with a serum 25(OH)D cut-off level of 30 nmol/l (OR 1.47; 95% CI 0.92-2.36). CONCLUSIONS: The low status of maternal vitamin D could be an adverse factor for postpartum depression, but the available evidence suggested no association between vitamin D deficiency and depressive symptoms during pregnancy. However, this result should be interpreted with caution owning to the small number of studies. Well-designed intervention studies are also needed to further evaluate the benefits of vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy.

A mixed-methods evaluation of continuous electronic fetal monitoring for an extended period.

INTRODUCTION: Continuous fetal monitoring is used to objectively record the fetal heart rate and fetal activity over an extended period of time; however, its feasibility and acceptability to women is currently unknown. The study addressed the hypothesis that continuous fetal monitoring is feasible and acceptable to pregnant women. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Pregnant participants (n = 22) were monitored using a continuous fetal electrocardiography device, the Monica AN24. Signal quality, duration of recording and cardiotocography findings were correlated with maternal and fetal factors. Participants' change in anxiety before and after monitoring was assessed using validated questionnaires. Participants' experiences were explored through a questionnaire (n = 20) and semi-structured interview (n = 13). RESULTS: Recordings were successfully obtained in 19 of the 22 participants (86.3%). The mean recording quality of fetal heart rate was 69.0% (range 17.4%-99.4%) and maternal heart rate was 99.0% (90.9%-100.0%). Recording quality was positively correlated with gestational age (P = 0.05) and negatively correlated with uterine activity and maternal movement (P < 0.001). Overall, participants were satisfied with their experience of continuous fetal monitoring; 30% considered it preferable to intermittent monitoring. Continuous fetal monitoring did not significantly increase maternal anxiety, with a trend towards a reduction in Pregnancy Specific Anxiety score (P = 0.07). Qualitative analysis grouped women's responses into three themes: (a) reassurance and anxiety, (b) the physical device and (c) future developments in continuous fetal monitoring. CONCLUSIONS: Continuous fetal monitoring is a feasible and acceptable form of monitoring to pregnant women although further practical improvements could be incorporated. Further research is required to assess the ability of continuous fetal monitoring to detect fetal compromise.

Midwives' perceptions on using a fetoscope and Doppler for fetal heart rate assessments during labor: a qualitative study in rural Tanzania.

BACKGROUND: The Doppler is thought to be more comfortable and effective compared to the fetoscope for assessing the fetal heart rate (FHR) during labor. However, in a rural Tanzanian hospital, midwives who had easy access to both devices mostly used fetoscope. This study explored midwives' perception of factors influencing their preference for using either a Pinard fetoscope or a FreePlay wind-up Doppler for intermittent FHR monitoring. METHODS: Midwives who had worked for at least 6 months in the labor ward were recruited. Focus group discussion (FGD) was used to collect data. Five FGDs were conducted between December 2015 and February 2016. Qualitative content analysis was employed using NVivo 11.0. RESULTS: Three main themes emerged as factors perceived by midwives as influencing their preference; 1) Sufficient training and experience with using a device; Midwives had been using fetoscopes since their midwifery training, and they had vast experience using it. The Doppler was recently introduced in the maternity ward, and midwives had insufficient training in how to use it. 2) Ability of the device to produce reliable measurements; Using a fetoscope, one must listen for the heartbeat, count using a watch, and calculate, the Doppler provides both a display and sound of the FHR. Fetoscope measurements are prone to human errors, and Doppler measurements are prone to instrumental errors. 3) Convenience of use and comfort of a device; Fetoscopes do not need charging, and while it is possible to "personalize/hide" the measurements, and may be painful for mothers. Dopplers need charging and do not cause pain, but provide limited privacy. CONCLUSION: Midwives' preferences of FHR monitoring devices are influenced by the level of device training, experience with using a device, reliable measurements, and convenience and comfort during use. Fetoscopes and Dopplers should be equally available during midwifery training and in clinical practice.

A pilot exploratory investigation on pregnant women's views regarding STan fetal monitoring technology.

BACKGROUND: Women's views are critical for informing the planning and delivery of maternity care services. ST segment analysis (STan) is a promising method to more accurately detect when unborn babies are at risk of brain damage or death during labour that is being trialled for the first time in Australia. This is the first study to examine women's views about STan monitoring in this context. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with pregnant women recruited across a range of clinical locations at the study hospital. The interviews included hypothetical scenarios to assess women's prospective views about STan monitoring (as an adjunct to cardiotocography, (CTG)) compared to the existing fetal monitoring method of CTG alone. This article describes findings from an inductive and descriptive thematic analysis. RESULTS: Most women preferred the existing fetal monitoring method compared to STan monitoring; women's decision-making was multifaceted. Analysis yielded four themes relating to women's views towards fetal monitoring in labour: a) risk and labour b) mobility in labour c) autonomy and choice in labour d) trust in maternity care providers. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that women's views towards CTG and STan monitoring are multifaceted, and appear to be influenced by individual labour preferences and the information being received and understood. This underlies the importance of clear communication between maternity care providers and women about technology use in intrapartum care. This research is now being used to inform the implementation of the first properly powered Australian randomised trial comparing STan and CTG monitoring.

Time and number of displays impact critical signal detection in fetal heart rate tracings.

Interest in centralized monitoring in labor and delivery units is growing because it affords the opportunity to monitor multiple patients simultaneously. However, a long history of research on sustained attention reveals these types of monitoring tasks can be problematic. The goal of the present experiment was to examine the ability of individuals to detect critical signals in fetal heart rate (FHR) tracings in one or more displays over an extended period of time. Seventy-two participants monitored one, two, or four computer-simulated FHR tracings on a computer display for the appearance of late decelerations over a 48-minute vigil. Measures of subjective stress and workload were also obtained before and after the vigil. The results showed that detection accuracy decreased over time and also declined as the number of displays increased. The subjective reports indicated that participants found the task to be stressful and mentally demanding, effortful, and frustrating. The results suggest that centralized monitoring that allows many patients to be monitored simultaneously may impose a detrimental attentional burden on the observer. Furthermore, this seemingly benign task may impose an additional source of stress and mental workload above what is commonly found in labor and delivery units.

Maternal perceptions of labor with fetal monitoring by pulse oximetry in a research setting.

OBJECTIVE: Little research has evaluated maternal experience with fetal pulse oximetry for fetal surveillance. The purpose of this study was to compare maternal perceptions of labor with intrapartal cardiotocography with or without fetal pulse oximetry in a research setting. METHODS: One hundred women with vaginal, vertex deliveries and uncomplicated fetal outcomes were enrolled. The study group was a subset of 50 mothers who had participated in a pulse oximetry trial. The control group of 50 mothers was monitored by cardiotocography only. Both groups were matched for age, parity, weeks of gestation, epidural anesthesia use, and duration of labor. A global measure of maternal perception of labor was established by experience with labor, general attitude toward monitoring devices, satisfaction with monitoring, nursing and medical care, and anxiety, each of which was evaluated separately. The mothers in the study group were also interviewed about aspects related to the fetal pulse oximetry research setting, such as information, movement restriction, discomfort, care, privacy, and safety. The questionnaires were based on a standardized rating scale model, and the interviews were conducted two to four days after delivery. The results were analyzed by chi-squared, paired t test, and ANOVA. RESULTS: No significant differences were observed between the study and control participants in any parameter concerning the maternal perception of labor. Mothers' experiences with pulse oximetry as assessed by interview was overwhelmingly positive. CONCLUSIONS: Fetal monitoring by pulse oximetry in a research setting did not affect maternal perceptions of labor. Mothers' experiences with pulse oximetry were highly positive, suggesting that research in fetal pulse oximetry need not compromise maternal perceptions of labor.

Domiciliary fetal monitoring in a district maternity unit.

Domiciliary Fetal Monitoring is a new technique which allows fetal heart rate monitoring from within a patient's home. The 30 minute cardiotocograph is transmitted by telephone, to a central labour ward computer, within 45 seconds. Of 522 domiciliary cardiotocographs performed on 100 consecutive patients, 356 (68%) were performed for suspected intrauterine growth retardation or reduced fetal movements. Thirty one (5.9%) recordings were abnormal; a repeat cardiotocograph in hospital was abnormal in 9 cases (1.3%); all such patients were delivered within 7 days. The induction rate for the study group was increased by a factor of 3.2 with respect to all hospital confinements; 49% of infants were small for gestational age (less than 10th percentile). Caesarean section and forceps delivery rates were the same for both groups. No stillbirths occurred in the study group. After the introduction of domiciliary monitoring, the number and duration of hospital admissions for fetal surveillance were reduced by 29% and 52% respectively. Patients were equally as able as midwives to perform domiciliary fetal monitoring. A patient survey revealed widespread satisfaction with the DFM system.