Short versus long duration of ceftaroline combination therapy and outcomes in persistent or high-grade MRSA bacteremia: A retrospective single-center study.

BACKGROUND: Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is associated with high mortality rates. Despite antibiotic therapy, persistent bacteremia is challenging to treat. Combination therapy with ceftaroline has emerged as a potential treatment option; however, the optimal duration and clinical implications after bacteremia clearance are unknown. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study examined patients with high-grade or persistent MRSA bacteremia who were treated with ceftaroline combination therapy at the University of New Mexico Hospital between January 2014 and June 2021. Patients were categorized into short- (<7 days) or long-duration (≥7 days) groups based on the duration of combination therapy after bacteremia clearance. Outcomes included 30-day all-cause mortality, bacteremia recurrence, post-bacteremia clearance length of stay, and adverse events. RESULTS: A total of 32 patients were included in this study. The most common sources of bacteremia were bone/joint and endovascular (28.1%, 9/32 each). The median duration of combination therapy after clearance was seven days (IQR 2.8, 11). Patients in the long-duration group had a lower Charlson comorbidity index (1.0 vs 5.5, p = 0.017) than those in the short-duration group. After adjusting for confounders, there was no significant difference in the 30-day all-cause mortality between the groups (AOR 0.17, 95% CI 0.007-1.85, p = 0.18). No association was found between combination therapy duration and recurrence (OR 2.53, 95% CI 0.19-inf, p = 0.24) or adverse drug events (OR 3.46, 95% CI 0.39-74.86, p = 0.31). After controlling for total hospital length of stay, there was no significant difference in the post-bacteremia clearance length of stay between the two groups (p = 0.37). CONCLUSIONS: Prolonging ceftaroline combination therapy after bacteremia clearance did not significantly improve outcomes in patients with persistent or high-grade MRSA bacteremia. The limitations of this study warrant cautious interpretation of its results. Larger studies are needed to determine the optimal duration and role of combination therapy for this difficult-to-treat infection.

Cefepime-taniborbactam and CERTAIN-1: Can we treat carbapenem-resistant infections?

Wagenlehner and colleagues1 demonstrated non-inferiority and superiority with respect to a primary endpoint of composite success (microbiological plus clinical) of cefepime/taniborbactam vs. meropenem in treating complicated urinary tract infections and acute pyelonephritis caused by carbapenem-susceptible gram-negative bacteria in adults. A major area of interest in real-world application of cefepime/taniborbactam is its potential role in treating carbapenem-resistant infections, which deserves further investigation.

[Perioperative Use of Antibiotics as Infection Prophylaxis in Elective Wrist Arthroscopy: A Nationwide Survey]. / Einsatz von Antibiotikum zur perioperativen Infektprophylaxe in der elektiven Handgelenksarthroskopie: Eine deutschlandweite Befragung.

BACKGROUND: Wrist arthroscopy is a standard procedure in hand surgery for the diagnosis and treatment of wrist conditions. While perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis (PAP) is not generally recommended for elective hand surgery, there is no official standard for elective wrist arthroscopy. This study aimed to determine the actual clinical use of PAP in elective wrist arthroscopy in Germany and relate it to the structural conditions of clinics performing this procedure. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a systematic search of all facilities in Germany offering wrist arthroscopy. Among these, we performed an online survey using the SoSci Survey online tool via email. RESULTS: PAP is more frequently administered in cases involving simultaneous bone procedures. Cephalosporins are the most commonly used antibiotics in cases of PAP administration. Hospitals administer PAP more frequently than outpatient settings, with most surveyed institutions following facility-specific internal standards for antibiotic administration. The number of arthroscopies performed in the surveyed centres does not influence antibiotic administration. CONCLUSIONS: The use of PAP in wrist arthroscopies in Germany is inconsistent. The increased use in arthroscopies with bone involvement corresponds to AWMF guidelines, but a general recommendation for wrist arthroscopies, including soft tissue arthroscopies, is necessary to provide physicians with medical and legal certainty.

Ceftobiprole mono-therapy versus combination or non-combination regimen of standard antibiotics for the treatment of complicated infections: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Various bacteria produce complicated infections that are difficult to treat worldwide. Ceftobiprole is effective against resistant Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria. METHODS: This review assessed effectiveness and safety of ceftobiprole monotherapy for severe infections. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing clinical cure, microbiological cure, and safety of ceftobiprole alone to a combination or non-combination antibiotic regimen was conducted. Until December 20, 2022, we searched a major databases. RESULTS: This study includes 4168 patients from six trials. Ceftobiprole and comparator-received patients had similar clinical responses for all patient population. Also, the eradication rate of all organisms and specific pathogenic bacteria in microbiologically examined patients was comparable between the groups. Ceftobiprole induced more gastrointestinal side events than comparable drugs, mostly nausea [OR 1.91 (1.26-2.90), p=<0.01]. While skin-related adverse events were significantly associated with comparator antibiotics [6 trials, 4062 patients; OR 0.77 (0.60-0.99), p=0.03]. CONCLUSION: Ceftobiprole monotherapy is effective and safe for severe infections caused by Gram-positive or Gram-negative bacteria.

Assessing Clinician Utilization of Next-Generation Antibiotics Against Resistant Gram-Negative Infections in U.S. Hospitals : A Retrospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: The U.S. antibiotic market failure has threatened future innovation and supply. Understanding when and why clinicians underutilize recently approved gram-negative antibiotics might help prioritize the patient in future antibiotic development and potential market entry rewards. OBJECTIVE: To determine use patterns of recently U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved gram-negative antibiotics (ceftazidime-avibactam, ceftolozane-tazobactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, plazomicin, eravacycline, imipenem-relebactam-cilastatin, and cefiderocol) and identify factors associated with their preferential use (over traditional generic agents) in patients with gram-negative infections due to pathogens displaying difficult-to-treat resistance (DTR; that is, resistance to all first-line antibiotics). DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. SETTING: 619 U.S. hospitals. PARTICIPANTS: Adult inpatients. MEASUREMENTS: Quarterly percentage change in antibiotic use was calculated using weighted linear regression. Machine learning selected candidate variables, and mixed models identified factors associated with new (vs. traditional) antibiotic use in DTR infections. RESULTS: Between quarter 1 of 2016 and quarter 2 of 2021, ceftolozane-tazobactam (approved 2014) and ceftazidime-avibactam (2015) predominated new antibiotic usage whereas subsequently approved gram-negative antibiotics saw relatively sluggish uptake. Among gram-negative infection hospitalizations, 0.7% (2551 [2631 episodes] of 362 142) displayed DTR pathogens. Patients were treated exclusively using traditional agents in 1091 of 2631 DTR episodes (41.5%), including "reserve" antibiotics such as polymyxins, aminoglycosides, and tigecycline in 865 of 1091 episodes (79.3%). Patients with bacteremia and chronic diseases had greater adjusted probabilities and those with do-not-resuscitate status, acute liver failure, and Acinetobacter baumannii complex and other nonpseudomonal nonfermenter pathogens had lower adjusted probabilities of receiving newer (vs. traditional) antibiotics for DTR infections, respectively. Availability of susceptibility testing for new antibiotics increased probability of usage. LIMITATION: Residual confounding. CONCLUSION: Despite FDA approval of 7 next-generation gram-negative antibiotics between 2014 and 2019, clinicians still frequently treat resistant gram-negative infections with older, generic antibiotics with suboptimal safety-efficacy profiles. Future antibiotics with innovative mechanisms targeting untapped pathogen niches, widely available susceptibility testing, and evidence demonstrating improved outcomes in resistant infections might enhance utilization. PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE: U.S. Food and Drug Administration; NIH Intramural Research Program.

Clinical effectiveness of cefiderocol for the treatment of bloodstream infections due to carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii during the COVID-19 era: a single center, observational study.

BACKGROUND: We assessed the clinical effectiveness of cefiderocol (CFDC) in comparison with colistin (COL) for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) bloodstream infections (BSI). MATERIALS/METHODS: Retrospective cohort study including adults with CRAB-BSI. Outcomes were mortality, clinical cure and adverse events during therapy. The average treatment effect of CFDC compared to COL was weighted with the inverse-probability treatment weight (IPTW). RESULTS: Overall, 104 patients were included (50 CFDC, 54 COL), median age 66.5 years, median Charlson Comorbidity Index 5, septic shock in 33.6% of patients. Primary BSI accounted for 43.3% of cases, followed by ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) (26%), catheter-related BSI (20.2%) and hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) (9.6%). Although not significantly, mortality at all time points was lower for CFDC than COL, while clinical cure was higher in CFDC than COL (66% vs. 44.4%, p = 0.027). Adverse events were more frequent in COL than CFDC-group (38.8% vs. 10%, p < 0.0001), primarily attributed to acute kidney injury (AKI) in the COL group. Patients with bacteremic HAP/VAP treated with CFDC had a significant lower 30-d mortality and higher clinical cure than COL (p = 0.008 and p = 0.0008, respectively). Increment of CCI (p = 0.005), ICU (p = 0.025), SARS-CoV2 (p = 0.006) and ECMO (p < 0.0001) were independently associated with 30-d mortality, while receiving CFDC was not associated with survival. CONCLUSIONS: CFDC could represent an effective and safe treatment option for CRAB BSI, especially in patients with bacteremic HAP/VAP and frail patients where the risk of acute renal failure during therapy should be avoided.

Misidentification and misreporting of antibiotic resistance in Kluyvera bacteremia by blood culture molecular identification panels.

The use of molecular identification panels has advanced the diagnosis for blood stream infections with fast turnaround time and high accuracy. Yet, this technology cannot completely replace conventional blood culture and standardized antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST) given its limitations and occasional false results. Here we present two cases of bacteremia caused by Kluyvera. Its identification and antibiotic resistance were at least partially mispresented by blood culture molecular identification panels on ePlex, Verigene, and Biofire. The detection of CTX-M resistance marker did not align with the susceptibility to the third generation cephalosporins among a wide range of antibiotics for this organism. Conventional extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) testing was used to confirm the absence of ESBL. Caution should be taken when managing cases with CTX-M or ESBL detection in blood culture caused by uncommon pathogens. Conventional culture with microbial identification and standardized AST should continue to be the gold standard for routine patient care. IMPORTANCE: This is the first report that highlights the limitations of blood culture molecular identification panels on identifying Kluyvera and its associated antibiotic resistance patterns. Both the false identification and overreporting of antibiotic resistance could mislead the treatment for bacteremia caused by this pathogen. Patient isolation could have been avoided due to the lack of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL) activity of the organism. This report emphasizes the importance of confirming rapid identification and antibiotic resistance by molecular technologies with standardized methods. It also provides insight into the development of new diagnostic panels.

Treatment of infections caused by multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli: A practical approach by the Italian (SIMIT) and French (SPILF) Societies of Infectious Diseases.

INTRODUCTION: The emergence of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli and the development of new antibiotics have complicated the selection of optimal regimens. International guidelines are valuable tools, but are limited by the scarcity of high-quality randomized trials in many situations. METHODS: A panel of experts from the French and Italian Societies of Infectious Diseases aimed to address unresolved issues in clinical practice based on their experience, an updated literature review and open discussions. RESULTS: The panel reached consensus for the following 'first choices': (i) cefepime for ventilator-acquired pneumonia due to AmpC ß-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales; (ii) the ß-lactam/ß-lactamase inhibitor combination most active in vitro, or cefiderocol combined with fosfomycin, and aerosolized colistin or aminoglycosides, for severe pneumonia due to Pseudomonas aeruginosa resistant to ceftolozane-tazobactam; (iii) high-dose piperacillin-tazobactam (including loading dose and continuous infusion) for complicated urinary tract infections (cUTIs) caused by extended-spectrum ß-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales with piperacillin-tazobactam minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) ≤8 mg/L; (iv) high-dose cefepime for cUTIs due to AmpC ß-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales other than Enterobacter spp. if cefepime MIC ≤2 mg/L; (v) ceftolozane-tazobactam or ceftazidime-avibactam plus metronidazole for intra-abdominal infections (IAIs) due to third-generation cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacterales; (vi) ceftazidime-avibactam plus aztreonam plus metronidazole for IAIs due to metallo-ß-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales; (vii) ampicillin-sulbactam plus colistin for bloodstream infections (BSIs) caused by carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii; (viii) meropenem-vaborbactam for BSIs caused by Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales; and (ix) ceftazidime-avibactam plus fosfomycin for neurological infections caused by carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa. CONCLUSIONS: These expert choices were based on the necessary balance between antimicrobial stewardship principles and the need to provide optimal treatment for individual patients in each situation.

Cystatin C Outperforms Creatinine in Predicting Cefepime Clearance in Pediatric Stem Cell Transplant Recipients.

Pediatric hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) patients are at risk of developing both sepsis and altered kidney function. Cefepime is used for empiric coverage post-HSCT and requires dose adjustment based on kidney function. Since cefepime's antimicrobial efficacy is determined by the time free concentrations exceed bacterial minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), it is important to assess kidney function accurately to ensure adequate concentrations. Serum creatinine (SCr) is routinely used to estimate glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) but varies with muscle mass, which can be significantly lower in HSCT patients, making SCr an inaccurate kidney function biomarker. Cystatin C (CysC) eGFR is independent of muscle mass, though steroid use increases CysC. Objectives of this study were to describe how eGFR impacts cefepime pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) target attainment in pediatric HSCT patients, to investigate which method of estimating GFR (SCr, CysC, combined) best predicts cefepime clearance, and to explore additional predictors of cefepime clearance. Patients admitted to the pediatric HSCT unit who received ≥2 cefepime doses were prospectively enrolled. We measured total cefepime peak/trough concentrations between the second and fourth cefepime doses and measured SCr and CysC if not already obtained clinically within 24h of cefepime samples. eGFRs were calculated with Chronic Kidney Disease in Children U25 equations. Bayesian estimates of cefepime clearance were determined with a pediatric cefepime PK model and PK software MwPharm++. Simple linear regression was used to compare cefepime clearance normalized to body surface area (BSA) to BSA-normalized SCr-, CysC-, and SCr-/CysC-eGFRs, while multiple linear regression was used to account for additional predictors of cefepime clearance. For target attainment, we assessed the percentage of time free cefepime concentrations exceeded 1x MIC (%fT>1x MIC) and 4x MIC (%fT>4x MIC) using a susceptibility breakpoint of 8 mg/L for Pseudomonas aeruginosa. We enrolled 53 patients (ages 1 to 30 years, median 8.9 years). SCr- and CysC-eGFRs were lower in patients who attained 100% fT>1xMIC compared to those who did not attain this target: 115 versus 156 mL/min/1.73m2 (p = .01) for SCr-eGFR and 73.5 versus 107 mL/min/1.73m2 (p < .001) for CysC-eGFR. SCr-eGFR was weakly positively correlated with cefepime clearance (adjusted [a]r2= 0.14), while CysC-eGFR and SCr-/CysC-eGFR had stronger positive correlations (ar2 = 0.30 CysC, ar2 = 0.28 combo. There was a weak, significant linear association between increasing CysC-eGFR and decreased %fT>1xMIC (ar2 = 0.32) and %fT>4xMIC (ar2 = 0.14). No patients with a CysC-eGFR >120 mL/min/1.73 m2 achieved 100% fT>1xMIC or 50% fT>4x MIC. In multiple regression models, underlying diagnosis of hemoglobinopathy (in all models) and being pretransplant (in SCr and combined models) were associated with increased cefepime clearance, while concomitant use of calcineurin inhibitors was associated with decreased cefepime clearance in all models. Overall, the combo-eGFR model with timing pretransplant, hemoglobinopathy, and use of calcineurin inhibitors had the best performance (ar2 = 0.63). CysC-based eGFRs (CysC alone and combined) predicted cefepime clearance better than SCr-eGFR, even after considering steroid use. Increasing CysC eGFR correlated with decreased probability of PD target attainment, raising concerns for underdosing at high eGFRs. CysC should be included when estimating kidney function to provide adequate dosing of cefepime in pediatric HSCT patients.

Towards optimizing cefepime/tazobactam (WCK 4282) exposure to achieve efficacy against piperacillin/tazobactam-resistant ESBL infections: dose recommendations for various renal functions, including intermittent haemodialysis, in healthy individuals.

OBJECTIVES: WCK 4282 is a novel combination of cefepime 2 g and tazobactam 2 g being developed for the treatment of infections caused by piperacillin/tazobactam-resistant ESBL infections. The dosing regimen for cefepime/tazobactam needs to be optimized to generate adequate exposures to treat infections caused by ESBL-producing pathogens resistant to both cefepime and piperacillin/tazobactam. METHODS: We developed pharmacokinetic population models of cefepime and tazobactam to evaluate the optimal dose adjustments in patients, including those with augmented renal clearance as well as various degrees of renal impairment, and also for those on intermittent haemodialysis. Optimal doses for various degrees of renal function were identified by determining the PTA for a range of MICs. To cover ESBL-producing pathogens with an cefepime/tazobactam MIC of 16 mg/L, a dosing regimen of 2 g q8h infused over 1.5 h resulted in a combined PTA of 99% for the mean murine 1 log10-kill target for the cefepime/tazobactam combination. RESULTS: We found that to adjust for renal function, doses need to be reduced to 1 g q8h, 500 mg q8h and 500 mg q12h for patients with CLCR of 30-59, 15-29 and 8-14 mL/min (as well as patients with intermittent haemodialysis), respectively. In patients with high to augmented CLR (estimated CLCR 120-180 mL/min), a prolonged 4 h infusion of standard dose is required. CONCLUSIONS: The suggested dosing regimens will result in exposures of cefepime and tazobactam that would be adequate for infections caused by ESBL-producing pathogens with a cefepime/tazobactam MICs up to 16 mg/L.

Ceftaroline for Central Nervous System Infections: Case Report of a Young Infant, and Scoping Review.

BACKGROUND: Managing health care acquired and device-associated intracranial infections in young children can be challenging given adverse antibiotic side effects and difficulties in achieving adequate central nervous system (CNS) antibiotic concentrations. Ceftaroline is a cephalosporin with a favorable safety profile and activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococci and several Gram-negative organisms. Published data on the use of ceftaroline for CNS infections in children and adults are limited. METHODS: We describe a 2-month-old infant with ventriculo-subgaleal shunt-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis ventriculitis, which was successfully treated with ceftaroline, in addition to vancomycin and rifampin. We conducted a scoping review of English-language literature retrieved from PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science that assessed the use of ceftaroline for CNS infections. RESULTS: We identified 22 articles for inclusion in our review, which described 92 unique patients, of whom 2 were <21 years old. Ceftaroline was commonly used in conjunction with other antibiotics to treat infections caused by Staphylococcus aureus , coagulase-negative Staphylococci and Streptococcus pneumoniae . Most case reports described clinical success with ceftaroline, though small case series and cohort studies yielded mixed efficacy assessments. Adverse effects attributed to ceftaroline were rare and included reversible myelosuppression, eosinophilia, hepatotoxicity and nephrotoxicity. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic studies suggested similar CNS penetration through inflamed meninges as other beta lactam antibiotics. CONCLUSIONS: We identified a growing body of published evidence supporting the use of ceftaroline in combination with other agents for the treatment of CNS infections. In absence of clinical trials, additional real-world data are needed to define the efficacy and safety of ceftaroline for children and adults with CNS infections.

Cefdinir vs cephalexin for the treatment of urinary tract infections: A retrospective evaluation.

PURPOSE: Cefdinir and cephalexin are cephalosporin antibiotics commonly used in the treatment of urinary tract infections (UTIs). Their efficacy depends on achieving sufficient time with concentrations exceeding the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC). Despite being frequently prescribed for UTIs, cefdinir has markedly lower urine penetration compared to cephalexin. It is possible that differences in pharmacokinetics could result in dissimilar efficacy between these agents; however, comparative studies of cephalosporins in UTIs are lacking. METHODS: This was a retrospective comparative study of patients discharged from emergency departments within a community health system with a diagnosis of acute cystitis who were prescribed cefdinir or cephalexin. Treatment failure rates at 7 and 14 days were compared between the 2 agents using a χ2 or Fisher's exact test, as appropriate. RESULTS: There were no differences in overall treatment failure between the cefdinir and cephalexin groups. Treatment failure at 7 days occurred in 11.6% (n = 14) of patients in the cefdinir group and 8.3% (n = 10) of patients in the cephalexin group (P = 0.389). Treatment failure at 14 days was higher for cefdinir at 20.7% (n = 25) than for cephalexin at 11.8% (n = 14), but this difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.053). There were no differences in the rate of treatment failure in subgroup analyses of uncomplicated or complicated UTIs. CONCLUSION: The results of this study suggest that cefdinir and cephalexin have comparable efficacy for the treatment of lower UTIs. While there was a numerically higher rate of treatment failure with cefdinir, there were no significant differences in treatment failure between the agents.

Intramammary treatment of clinical mastitis quarters with ceftiofur does not cause anbiotic residues in adjacent untreated quarters.

The study was carried out in dairy cows to elucidate whether treatment of clinical mastitis quarters with Spectramast® LC (ceftiofur hydrochloride, 125 mg, Zoetis) created a reason for discarding milk from adjacent untreated healthy quarters. The antibiotic was infused once daily in the affected mammary quarter for four days. Forty-nine cows were evaluated after diagnosis of clinical mastitis in three or fewer udder quarters. In all cases, quarters that did not receive treatment had milk samples collected one day after the end of treatment. All milk samples from untreated quarters were below the maximum permissible limit for the presence of antibiotic residues after analysis with the BetaStar S Combo test. Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic characteristics may explain this finding. We conclude that it is feasible to use milk from untreated quarters of animals that have been treated with Spectramast® LC. We also reiterate the need to carry out tests with other pharmacological bases, and that the results found in this experiment cannot be extrapolated to other drugs.Dairy cattle have considerable importance in the development of the Brazilian economy, being directly linked to economic and social progress. In the first half of 2020, 12.1 billion liters of milk were produced in Brazil and in 2019, there was a new record of 25.01 billion liters produced (IBGE, 2020). This production comes from a wide variety of production systems, coming from smallholder farmers as well as from large companies that use the latest technologies available on the market. Dairy production is a complex activity. For one to obtain economical success, several aspects must be monitored. Maintaining the health of animals is a top priority, and the literature suggests that various diseases are a common challenge for dairy producers. Mastitis is the main disease that affects dairy cows, responsible for considerable economic loss and significant zootechnical and productive challenges (Ruegg, ). It is considered the second leading cause of cow culling in dairy herds, behind reproductive problems. Mastitis is characterized by infection of the mammary gland and may or may not occur with inflammation, generating changes in the mammary tissue and properties of the milk. It is classifield into clinical or subclinical mastitis, according to presence or absence of clinical signs, and into contagious or environmental based on the causative agent (Correa et al., ).