Myocardial Scar and Mortality in Chronic Aortic Regurgitation.

Background Chronic aortic regurgitation (AR) can be associated with myocardial scarring. It is unknown if scarring in AR is linked to poor outcomes and whether aortic valve replacement impacts this association. We investigated the relationship of myocardial scarring to mortality in chronic AR using cardiac magnetic resonance. Methods and Results We enrolled patients with moderate or greater AR between 2009 and 2019 and performed a blinded assessment of left ventricle remodeling, AR severity, and presence and extent of myocardial scarring by late gadolinium enhancement. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. We followed 392 patients (median age 62 [interquartile range, 51-71] years), and 78.1% were men, and 25.8% had bicuspid valves. Median aortic valve regurgitant volume was 39 mL (interquartile range, 30-60). Myocardial scar was present in 131 (33.4%) patients. Aortic valve replacement was performed in 165 (49.1%) patients. During follow-up, up to 10.8 years (median 32.3 months [interquartile range, 9.8-69.5]), 51 patients (13%) died. Presence of myocardial scar (hazard ratio [HR], 3.62; 95% CI, 2.06-6.36; P<0.001), infarction scar (HR, 4.94; 95% CI, 2.58-9.48; P<0.001), and noninfarction scar (HR, 2.75; 95% CI, 1.39-5.44; P<0.004) were associated with mortality. In multivariable analysis, the presence of scar remained independently associated with death (HR, 2.53; 95% CI, 1.15-5.57; P=0.02). Among patients with myocardial scar, aortic valve replacement was independently associated with a lower risk of mortality (HR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.12-0.97; P=0.03), even after adjustment for confounders. Conclusions In aortic regurgitation, myocardial scar is independently associated with a 2.5-fold increase risk in mortality. Aortic valve replacement was associated with a reduction in risk of mortality in patients with scarring.

Islets of heterogeneous myocardium within the scar in cardiac magnetic resonance predict ventricular tachycardia after myocardial infarction.

INTRODUCTION: We assessed findings in cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) as predictors of ventricular tachycardia (VT) after myocardial infarction (MI), which could allow for more precise identification of patients at risk of sudden cardiac death. METHODS: Forty-eight patients after prior MI were enrolled and divided into two groups: with (n = 24) and without (n = 24) VT. VT was confirmed by electrophysiological study and exit site was estimated based on 12-lead electrocardiogram. All patients underwent CMR with late gadolinium enhancement. RESULTS: The examined groups did not differ significantly in clinical and demographical parameters (including LV ejection fraction). There was a significant difference in the infarct age between the VT and non-VT group (15.8 ± 8.4 vs 7.1 ± 6.7 years, respectively; P = .002), with the cut-off point at the level of 12 years. In the scar core, islets of heterogeneous myocardium were revealed. They were defined as areas of potentially viable myocardium within or adjacent to the core scar. The number of islets was the strongest independent predictor of VT (odds ratio [OR], 1.42; confidence interval [CI], 1.17-1.73), but total islet size and the largest islet area were also significantly higher in the VT group (OR, 1.04; CI, 1.02-1.07 and OR, 1.16; CI, 1.01-1.27, respectively). Myocardial segments with fibrosis forming 25%-75% of the ventricular wall were associated with a higher incidence of VT (7.5 ± 2.1 vs 5.7 ± 2.6; P = .014). Three-dimension CMR reconstruction confirmed good correlation of the location of the islets/channels with VT exit site during electroanatomical mapping in five cases. CONCLUSIONS: The identification and quantification of islets of heterogeneous myocardium within the scar might be useful for predicting VT in patients after MI.

The Impact of a Postmastectomy Chest Wall Scar Boost on Local Recurrence-free Survival in High-risk Patients.

INTRODUCTION: A scar boost following postmastectomy radiation to a total dose of > 50 Gy can be considered in cases of invasive breast cancer with high-risk features including advanced tumor stage, lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI), and positive margins. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of a scar boost on 5-year local recurrence-free survival (LRFS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 140 patients with invasive breast cancer treated with mastectomy and postmastectomy radiation at a single institution between 2007 and 2016. Patients received 50 to 50.4 Gy to the chest wall and the majority of scar boosts were 9 to 10 Gy. LRFS was examined using the Kaplan-Meier method and univariable Cox regression. RESULTS: A total of 140 patients met inclusion criteria with a median follow-up time of 48 months. Ninety-four (67.1%) patients did receive a scar boost and 46 (32.9%) patients did not. On subset analysis of patients with LVSI or positive margins, 5-year LRFS was 79.3% in patients treated with scar boost compared with 71.1% in patients without a scar boost (P = .537). In patients with T3 or T4 disease, 5-year LRFS was 80.9% in those who received scar boost and 71.6% in patients who did not (P = .967). The use of a scar boost was not associated with a significant improvement in LRFS on Cox regression (hazard ratio, 0.83; 95% confidence interval, 0.37-1.84; P = .654). CONCLUSION: Use of a scar boost following postmastectomy radiation decreased the absolute percentages of local recurrences in patients with high-risk features; however, this did not translate into a statistically significant benefit.

Impact of Multiple Myocardial Scars Detected by CMR in Patients Following STEMI.

OBJECTIVES: This study investigated the incidence and long-term prognostic importance of multiple myocardial scars in cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) in a large contemporary cohort of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). BACKGROUND: Patients presenting with STEMI may have multiple infarctions/scars caused by multiple culprit lesions, previous myocardial infarction (MI) or procedure-related MI due to nonculprit interventions. However, the incidence, long-term prognosis, and distribution of causes of multiple myocardial scars remain unknown. METHODS: CMR was performed in 704 patients with STEMI 1 day after primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and again 3 months later. Myocardial scars were assessed by late gadolinium enhancement (LGE). T2-weighted technique was used to differentiate acute from chronic infarctions. The presence of multiple scars was defined as scars located in different coronary territories. The combined endpoints of all-cause mortality and hospitalization for heart failure were assessed at 39 months (interquartile range [IQR]: 31 to 48 months). RESULTS: At 3 months, 59 patients (8.4%) had multiple scars. Of these, multiple culprits in STEMI were detected in 7 patients (1%), and development of a second nonculprit scar at follow-up occurred in 10 patients (1.4%). The most frequent cause of multiple scars was a chronic scar in the nonculprit myocardium. The presence of multiple scars was independently associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality and hospitalization for heart failure (hazard ratio: 2.7; 95% confidence interval: 1.1 to 6.8; p = 0.037). CONCLUSIONS: Multiple scars were present in 8.4% of patients with STEMI and were independently associated with an increased risk of long-term morbidity and mortality. The presence of multiple myocardial scars on CMR may serve as a useful tool in risk stratification of patients following STEMI. (DANish Study of Optimal Acute Treatment of Patients With ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction [DANAMI-3]; NCT01435408) (Primary PCI in Patients With ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction and Multivessel Disease: Treatment of Culprit Lesion Only or Complete Revascularization [PRIMULTI]; NCT01960933).

Maternal and perinatal outcomes of uterine rupture in a tertiary care hospital: a cross-sectional study.

Objective: The current study aims to evaluate the incidence, maternal and perinatal outcomes in cases presented with uterine rupture (UR) and to explore the differences in presentation, management and outcome of UR in patients with scarred versus unscarred uterus. Materials and methods: A cross-sectional study conducted in a tertiary care hospital over a period of 2 years. The study included all women diagnosed with UR and admitted to the emergency unit between January 2016 and December 2017. A structured questionnaire was used to collect the preoperative demographic and clinical data. An observation checklist was used for intraoperative findings and management. Postoperative data were collected about maternal and fetal outcomes. Data were analyzed using SPSS software. Qualitative variables were compared between groups using chi-square test while quantitative variables were compared using the Mann-Whitney test. Results: Sixty two women were diagnosed with uterine rupture (0.32% of all deliveries). The mean age of the included patients was 29.6 ± 5.6 years while the mean parity was 3.0 ± 1.8. Uterine repair was successful in 52 cases (83.9%). There were four (6.5%) maternal deaths and 42 (67.8%) perinatal deaths. Ten patients (16.1%) were transferred to the postoperative intensive care unit (ICU). Re-exploration was carried out in three cases. The most common complication of UR was disseminated intravascular coagulopathy (DIC) occurred in eight women (12.9%). Maternal and perinatal mortality were significantly higher in patients with unscarred uterus (p = .0001 and .026, respectively). Conclusions: The incidence of UR is 32/10,000 deliveries in our tertiary hospital. Rupture of unscarred uterus is associated with more maternal and fetal mortality. However, rupture of scarred uterus was more common due to the rising rate of cesarean sections.

Left Ventricular Scar and Prognosis in Chronic Chagas Cardiomyopathy.

BACKGROUND: Patients with chronic Chagas cardiomyopathy (CCC) have pronounced myocardial fibrosis, which may predispose to sudden cardiac death, despite well-preserved global left ventricular (LV) systolic function. Cardiac magnetic resonance can assess myocardial fibrosis by late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) sequences. OBJECTIVES: This prospective study evaluated if the presence of scar by LGE predicted hard adverse outcomes in a cohort of patients with CCC. METHODS: A prospective cohort of 140 patients with CCC (52.1% female; median age 57 years [interquartile range: 45 to 67 years]) were included. Cardiac magnetic resonance cine and LGE imaging were performed at enrollment with a 1.5-T scanner. The primary endpoint was the combination of cardiovascular death and sustained ventricular tachycardia. The secondary endpoint was the combination of cardiovascular death, sustained ventricular tachycardia, or cardiovascular hospitalization during follow-up. RESULTS: After a median of 34 months (interquartile range: 24 to 49 months) of follow-up, 11 cardiovascular deaths, 3 episodes of sustained ventricular tachycardia, and 20 cardiovascular hospitalizations were recorded. LGE scar was present in 71.4% of the patients, with the lateral, inferolateral, and inferior walls most commonly affected. Patients with positive LGE had lower LV ejection fraction and higher LV end-diastolic volume and LV mass than patients without LGE. No difference in other cardiovascular risk factors was noted. Patients with scar had higher event rates compared with those without scar for the primary (p = 0.043) and the secondary (p = 0.016) endpoint. In multivariable analysis, age and LGE area were related to primary outcome; age and lower LV ejection fraction were related to the secondary outcome. The pattern of LGE myocardial fibrosis was transmural, focal, or diffuse scar in approximately one-third of patients with positive LGE, and no pattern was specifically related to outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with CCC, presence of scar by LGE is common and is strongly associated with major adverse outcomes.

Scar Characterization to Predict Life-Threatening Arrhythmic Events and Sudden Cardiac Death in Patients With Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: The GAUDI-CRT Study.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to analyze whether scar characterization could improve the risk stratification for life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death (SCD). BACKGROUND: Among patients with a cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) indication, appropriate defibrillator (CRT-D) therapy rates are low. METHODS: Primary prevention patients with a class I indication for CRT were prospectively enrolled and assigned to CRT-D or CRT pacemaker according to physician's criteria. Pre-procedure contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance was obtained and analyzed to identify scar presence or absence, quantify the amount of core and border zone (BZ), and depict BZ distribution. The presence, mass, and characteristics of BZ channels in the scar were recorded. The primary endpoint was appropriate defibrillator therapy or SCD. RESULTS: 217 patients (39.6% ischemic) were included. During a median follow-up of 35.5 months (12 to 62 months), the primary endpoint occurred in 25 patients (11.5%) and did not occur in patients without myocardial scar. Among patients with scar (n = 125, 57.6%), those with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapies or SCD exhibited greater scar mass (38.7 ± 34.2 g vs. 17.9 ± 17.2 g; p < 0.001), scar heterogeneity (BZ mass/scar mass ratio) (49.5 ± 13.0 vs. 40.1 ± 21.7; p = 0.044), and BZ channel mass (3.6 ± 3.0 g vs. 1.8 ± 3.4 g; p = 0.018). BZ mass (hazard ratio: 1.06 [95% confidence interval: 1.04 to 1.08]; p < 0.001) and BZ channel mass (hazard ratio: 1.21 [95% confidence interval: 1.10 to 1.32]; p < 0.001) were the strongest predictors of the primary endpoint. An algorithm based on scar mass and the absence of BZ channels identified 148 patients (68.2%) without ICD therapy/SCD during follow-up with a 100% negative predictive value. CONCLUSIONS: The presence, extension, heterogeneity, and qualitative distribution of BZ tissue of myocardial scar independently predict appropriate ICD therapies and SCD in CRT patients.

Prognostic Value of Myocardial Scarring on CMR in Patients With Cardiac Sarcoidosis.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to understand the prognostic value of myocardial scarring as evidenced by late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) on cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging in patients with known or suspected cardiac sarcoidosis. BACKGROUND: Although CMR is increasingly used for the diagnosis of cardiac sarcoidosis, the prognostic value of CMR has been less well described in this population. METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane CENTRAL, and metaRegister of Controlled Trials were searched for CMR studies with ≥1 year of prognostic data. Primary endpoints were all-cause mortality and a composite outcome of arrhythmogenic events (ventricular arrhythmia, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shock, sudden cardiac death) plus all-cause mortality during follow-up. Summary effect estimates were generated with random-effects modeling. RESULTS: Ten studies were included, involving a total of 760 patients with a mean follow-up of 3.0 ± 1.1 years. Patients had a mean age of 53 years, 41% were male, 95.3% had known extracardiac sarcoidosis, and 21.6% had known cardiac sarcoidosis. The average ejection fraction was 57.8 ± 9.1%. Patients with LGE had higher odds for all-cause mortality (odds ratio [OR]: 3.06; p < 0.03) and higher odds of the composite outcome (OR: 10.74; p < 0.00001) than those without LGE. Patients with LGE had an increased annualized event rate of the composite outcome (11.9% vs. 1.1%; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with known or suspected cardiac sarcoidosis, the presence of LGE on CMR imaging is associated with increased odds of both all-cause mortality and arrhythmogenic events.

Nonischemic left ventricular scar and cardiac sudden death in the young.

Nonischemic left ventricular scar (NLVS) is a pattern of myocardial injury characterized by midventricular and/or subepicardial gadolinium hyperenhancement at cardiac magnetic resonance, in absence of significant coronary artery disease. We aimed to evaluate the prevalence of NLVS in juvenile sudden cardiac death and to ascertain its etiology at autopsy. We examined 281 consecutive cases of sudden death of subjects aged 1 to 35 years. NLVS was defined as a thin, gray rim of subepicardial and/or midmyocardial scar in the left ventricular free wall and/or the septum, in absence of significant stenosis of coronary arteries. NLVS was the most frequent finding (25%) in sudden deaths occurring during sports. Myocardial scar was localized most frequently within the left ventricular posterior wall and affected the subepicardial myocardium, often extending to the midventricular layer. On histology, it consisted of fibrous or fibroadipose tissue. Right ventricular involvement was always present. Patchy lymphocytic infiltrates were frequent. Genetic and molecular analyses clarified the etiology of NLVS in a subset of cases. Electrocardiographic (ECG) recordings were available in more than half of subjects. The most frequent abnormality was the presence of low QRS voltages (<0.5 mV) in limb leads. In serial ECG tracings, the decrease in QRS voltages appeared, in some way, progressive. NLVS is the most frequent morphologic substrate of juvenile cardiac sudden death in sports. It can be suspected based on ECG findings. Autopsy study and clinical screening of family members are required to differentiate between arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy/dysplasia and chronic acquired myocarditis.

Scar quantification by cardiovascular magnetic resonance as an independent predictor of long-term survival in patients with ischemic heart failure treated by coronary artery bypass graft surgery.

BACKGROUND: Scar burden by late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is associated with functional recovery after coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG). There is limited data on long-term mortality after CABG based on left ventricular (LV) scar burden. METHODS: Patients who underwent LGE CMR between January 2003 and February 2010 within 1 month prior to CABG were included. A standard 16 segment model was used for scar quantification. A score of 1 for no scar, 2 for ≤ 50 % and 3 for > 50 % transmurality was assigned for each segment. LV scar score (LVSS) defined as the sum of segment scores divided by 16. All-cause mortality was ascertained by social security death index. RESULTS: One hundred ninety-six patients met the inclusion criteria. 185 CMR studies were available. History of prior MI was present in 64 % and prior CABG in 5.4 % of patients. Scar was present in 72 % of patients and median LVEF was 38 %. Over a median follow up of 8.3 years, there were 64 deaths (34.6 %). There was no statistically significant difference in mortality between Scar and No-scar groups (37 % versus 29 %). In the group with scar, a lower scar burden (defined either < 4 segments with scar or based on LVSS) was independently associated with increased survival. CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing surgical revascularization, scar burden is negatively associated with survival in patients with scar. However, there is no difference in survival based on presence or absence of scar alone. CMR prior to CABG adds additional prognostic information.

Risk and Causes of Death in Patients After Alcohol Septal Ablation for Hypertrophic Obstructive Cardiomyopathy.

BACKGROUND: Because the final myocardial scar might be theoretically associated with an increased risk of sudden cardiac death, the long-term clinical course of patients who undergo alcohol septal ablation (ASA) is still a matter of debate. In this retrospective multicentre study, we report outcomes after ASA, including survival, analysis of causes of deaths, and association between time and cause of death. METHODS: We enrolled 366 consecutive patients (58 ± 12 years, 54% women) who were treated using ASA and followed-up for 5.1 ± 4.5 years. RESULTS: The in-hospital and 30-day mortality were 0.5% and 0.8%, respectively; the ASA-related morbidity was < 20%. Overall, 52 patients died during 1867 patient-years, which means the all-cause mortality rate was 2.8% per year. The mortality rates of sudden death and sudden death with an appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) discharge were 0.4% and 1% per year, respectively. Patients with sudden death or appropriate ICD discharge experienced these mortality events at younger age than patients who died of other hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy-related causes (60.8 years [range, 52-71.5 years] vs 72.4 years [range, 64.2-75.2 years]; P = 0.048). A total of 292 patients (80%) had an outflow gradient ≤ 30 mm Hg, and 327 patients (89%) were in New York Heart Association class ≤ II at the last clinical check-up. CONCLUSIONS: ASA had low procedure-related mortality, with subsequent 1% occurrence of sudden mortality events per year and 2.8% mortality rate per year in the long-term follow-up. Patients with sudden death or ICD discharge experienced the mortality events approximately 1 decade earlier than patients who died from other causes not related to hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

ECG myocardial scar quantification predicts reverse left ventricular remodeling and survival after cardiac resynchronization therapy implantation: A retrospective pilot study.

INTRODUCTION: Electrocardiographic (ECG) LV scar quantification may improve prediction of CRT response. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data were abstracted in 76 patients who underwent a first CRT implantation at 2 US centers. Selvester QRS scar quantification was performed using the LBBB modified QRS scoring method. Seven clinical variables previously associated with reverse LV remodeling (RLVR) and QRS score were included in logistic regression analysis. Survival was compared across QRS score quartiles using Kaplan-Meier curves. RLVR occurred more frequently in patients with QRS score ≤ 5 (63%) than QRS score>5 (22%), (OR=5.83, 95% CI=2.11-16.07). After adjustment for clinical variables using logistic regression, QRS score>5 predicted RLVR (Chi-square=20.3, P=0.005, AUC=0.782). Patients in the lowest quartile of QRS score (<4) had improved survival compared to patients in the other QRS score quartiles (P=0.037). CONCLUSION: ECG quantified LV scar predicts RLVR and long-term survival in patients with LBBB undergoing CRT implantation.

Acute hemodynamic decompensation during catheter ablation of scar-related ventricular tachycardia: incidence, predictors, and impact on mortality.

BACKGROUND: The occurrence of periprocedural acute hemodynamic decompensation (AHD) in patients undergoing radiofrequency catheter ablation of scar-related ventricular tachycardia (VT) has not been previously investigated. METHODS AND RESULTS: We identified univariate predictors of periprocedural AHD in 193 consecutive patients undergoing radiofrequency catheter ablation of scar-related VT. AHD was defined as persistent hypotension despite vasopressors and requiring mechanical support or procedure discontinuation. AHD occurred in 22 (11%) patients. Compared with the rest of the population, patients with AHD were older (68.5±10.7 versus 61.6±15.0 years; P=0.037); had a higher prevalence of diabetes mellitus (36% versus 18%; P=0.045), ischemic cardiomyopathy (86% versus 52%; P=0.002), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (41% versus 13%; P=0.001), and VT storm (77% versus 43%; P=0.002); had more severe heart failure (New York Heart Association class III/IV: 55% versus 15%, P<0.001; left ventricular ejection fraction: 26±10% versus 36±16%, P=0.003); and more often received periprocedural general anesthesia (59% versus 29%; P=0.004). At 21±7 months follow-up, the mortality rate was higher in the AHD group compared with the rest of the population (50% versus 11%, log-rank P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: AHD occurs in 11% of patients undergoing radiofrequency catheter ablation of scar-related VT and is associated with increased risk of mortality over follow-up. AHD may be predicted by clinical factors, including advanced age, ischemic cardiomyopathy, more severe heart failure status (New York Heart Association class III/IV, lower ejection fraction), associated comorbidities (diabetes mellitus and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease), presentation with VT storm, and use of general anesthesia.

Surviving cutaneous melanoma: a clinical review of follow-up practices, surveillance, and management of recurrence.

The number of melanoma survivors in the United States continues to steadily increase 2.6% per year, while death rates have remained stable over time. Although controversy exists regarding optimal surveillance strategies, recommendations for clinical monitoring are based on tumor stage, tumor phenotype, likelihood of recurrence, prognosis, risk factors, psychosocial impact of disease, and patient well-being. Management guidelines for recurrent disease depend on the type of recurrence: local, satellite/in-transit, regional, or distant metastasis. This article is a current review of the literature concerning melanoma survivorship.

Combined identification of septal flash and absence of myocardial scar by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging improves prediction of response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS OF STUDY: Septal flash (SF) describes early inward motion of the ventricular septum in patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB), and correction corresponds to increased response to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). SF has traditionally been assessed by echocardiography. We sought to determine if cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging could identify SF and if the additional assessment of scar would improve the ability of CMR to predict CRT response. METHODS: Fifty-two patients with LBBB and heart failure underwent prospective CMR scanning prior to CRT implantation. The presence of SF was assessed visually and by using endocardial contour-tracking software. Presence and extent of myocardial scar was assessed by delayed enhancement imaging during CMR. The association between SF, scar and reverse remodelling (RR) at 6 months was explored. RESULTS: RR rate to CRT at 6 months was 52%. CMR-derived SF was identified in 24 (46%) patients. RR was seen in more patients with SF than those without (88% vs 21%; P < 0.001). The absence of scar combined with the presence of SF had 96% specificity for predicting RR. In a multivariate regression model, the presence of SF was the only independent predictor of RR. CONCLUSION: SF can be assessed by CMR and predicts increased response to CRT. The additional value of CMR is the assessment of scar. The presence of SF with no scar is a highly specific predictor of CRT response.

Myocardial scar burden predicts survival benefit with implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation in patients with severe ischaemic cardiomyopathy: influence of gender.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to assess the impact of myocardial scar burden (MSB) on the association between implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) implantation and mortality in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) and left ventricular EF ≤ 40%. In addition, we sought to determine the impact of gender on survival benefit with ICD implantation. DESIGN: Retrospective observational study. SETTING: Single US tertiary care centre. PATIENTS: Consecutive patients with significant ICM who underwent delayed hyperenhancement-MRI between 2002 and 2006. INTERVENTIONS: ICD implantation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: All-cause mortality and cardiac transplantation. RESULTS: Follow-up of 450 consecutive patients, over a mean of 5.8 years, identified 186 deaths. Cox proportional hazard modelling was used to evaluate associations among MSB, gender and ICD with respect to all-cause death as the primary endpoint. ICDs were implanted in 163 (36%) patients. On multivariable analysis, Scar% (χ² 28.21, p<0.001), Gender (χ² 12.39, p=0.015) and ICD (χ² 9.57, p=0.022) were independent predictors of mortality after adjusting for multiple parameters. An interaction between MSB×ICD (χ² 9.47, p=0.009) demonstrated significant differential survival with ICD based on MSB severity. Additionally, Scar%×ICD×Gender (χ² 6.18, p=0.048) suggested that men with larger MSB had significant survival benefit with ICD, but men with smaller MSB derived limited benefit with ICD implantation. However, the inverse relationship was found in women. CONCLUSIONS: MSB is a powerful independent predictor of mortality in patients with and without ICD implantation. In addition, MSB may predict gender-based significant differences in survival benefit from ICDs in patients with severe ICM.

The incidence, pattern, and prognostic value of left ventricular myocardial scar by late gadolinium enhancement in patients with atrial fibrillation .

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to identify the frequency, pattern, and prognostic significance of left ventricular (LV) late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). BACKGROUND: There are limited data on the presence, pattern, and prognostic significance of LV myocardial fibrosis in patients with AF. LGE during cardiac magnetic resonance imaging is a marker for myocardial fibrosis. METHODS: A group of 664 consecutive patients without known prior myocardial infarction who were referred for radiofrequency ablation of AF were studied. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging was requested to assess pulmonary venous anatomy. RESULTS: Overall, 73% were men, with a mean age of 56 years and a mean LV ejection fraction of 56 ± 10%. LV LGE was found in 88 patients (13%). The endpoint was all-cause mortality, and in this cohort, 68 deaths were observed over a median follow-up period of 42 months. On univariate analysis, age (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.05; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.03 to 1.08; chi-square likelihood ratio [LRχ(2)]: 15.2; p = 0.0001), diabetes (HR: 2.39; 95% CI: 1.41 to 4.09; LRχ(2): 10.3; p = 0.001), a history of heart failure (HR: 1.78; 95% CI: 1.09 to 2.91; LRχ(2): 5.37; p = 0.02), left atrial dimension (HR: 1.04; 95% CI: 1.01 to 1.08; LRχ(2): 6.47; p = 0.01), presence of LGE (HR: 5.08; 95% CI: 3.08 to 8.36; LRχ(2): 28.8; p < 0.0001), and LGE extent (HR: 1.15; 95% CI: 1.10 to 1.21; LRχ(2): 35.6; p < 0.0001) provided the strongest associations with mortality. The mortality rate was 8.1% per patient-year in patients with LGE compared with 2.3% patients without LGE. In the best overall multivariate model for mortality, age and the extent of LGE were independent predictors of mortality. Indeed, each 1% increase in the extent of LGE was associated with a 15% increased risk for death. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with AF, LV LGE is a frequent finding and is a powerful predictor of mortality.

Assessment of myocardial scarring improves risk stratification in patients evaluated for cardiac defibrillator implantation.

OBJECTIVES: We tested whether an assessment of myocardial scarring by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) would improve risk stratification in patients evaluated for implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation. BACKGROUND: Current sudden cardiac death risk stratification emphasizes left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF); however, most patients suffering sudden cardiac death have a preserved LVEF, and many with poor LVEF do not benefit from ICD prophylaxis. METHODS: One hundred thirty-seven patients undergoing evaluation for possible ICD placement were prospectively enrolled and underwent cardiac MRI assessment of LVEF and scar. The pre-specified primary endpoint was death or appropriate ICD discharge for sustained ventricular tachyarrhythmia. RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 24 months the primary endpoint occurred in 39 patients. Whereas the rate of adverse events steadily increased with decreasing LVEF, a sharp step-up was observed for scar size >5% of left ventricular mass (hazard ratio [HR]: 5.2; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.0 to 13.3). On multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis, including LVEF and electrophysiological-study results, scar size (as a continuous variable or dichotomized at 5%) was an independent predictor of adverse outcome. Among patients with LVEF >30%, those with significant scarring (>5%) had higher risk than those with minimal or no (≤5%) scarring (HR: 6.3; 95% CI: 1.4 to 28.0). Those with LVEF >30% and significant scarring had risk similar to patients with LVEF ≤30% (p = 0.56). Among patients with LVEF ≤30%, those with significant scarring again had higher risk than those with minimal or no scarring (HR: 3.9; 95% CI: 1.2 to 13.1). Those with LVEF ≤30% and minimal scarring had risk similar to patients with LVEF >30% (p = 0.71). CONCLUSIONS: Myocardial scarring detected by cardiac MRI is an independent predictor of adverse outcome in patients being considered for ICD placement. In patients with LVEF >30%, significant scarring (>5% LV) identifies a high-risk cohort similar in risk to those with LVEF ≤30%. Conversely, in patients with LVEF ≤30%, minimal or no scarring identifies a low-risk cohort similar to those with LVEF >30%.

Left ventricular surgical remodeling after the STICH trial.

Surgical treatment of anteroseptal scars has been, and still is, a challenging task for cardiac surgeons. Most patients are in heart failure and the infarcted areas can include different parts of the septum and the anterior wall. The core problem of ischemic congestive heart failure is the undue demand placed on the residual viable left ventricle myocardium. The surgical techniques used to correct the mismatch between contractile and asynergic areas differ, but the evolution of surgical techniques for left ventricular surgical remodeling (LVSR) is still a work in progress. The most popular one was proposed by Dor et al. in the 1980s and is still in general use. This technique addressed the problem of recovering a predictable volume but not necessarily the problem of rebuilding a physiologically conical shape. This anatomical aspect is becoming increasingly important, and the purpose of septal reshaping, as proposed by us in 2004, is more to recover a conical shape than to achieve volume reduction. Thus, we use the Dor operation only when septoapical scars are present. The need for a different surgical strategy is emphasized by the result of the STICH trial, which reports the data of 1000 patients randomized for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG, n = 499) or CABG and LVSR (n = 501) and which failed to show any benefit of LVSR. However, the only surgical technique used was the classic Dor operation, where the purpose was to reestablish volume and not to recreate a physiological shape. This study, however, does not provide a definitive answer, as echocardiography results included only 212 patients in the CABG arm and 161 in the CABG and LVSR arm. Furthermore, previous myocardial infarction (MI) was not a prerequisite for study inclusion (13 % of patients in each group had no previous MI) and whether a previous MI was Q-wave or not was not specified. In conclusion, the long-term results after LVSR are satisfactory but appear to be better if a conical shape has been recreated. The role of preemptive surgery in selected cases and how to establish the limits of LVSR (grade of preoperative diastolic dysfunction, diastolic diameter, ventricular volumes, function of the remote zone, etc.) is still unclear. The impact of each individual treatment in the individual patient (medical treatment, CABG alone, CABG and LVSR) has still to be identified.