A quantitative LC-MS/MS method for the determination of tissue brincidofovir and cidofovir diphosphate in a MuPyV-infected mouse model.

Brincidofovir (BCV) is an investigational lipid conjugate of the nucleotide analog cidofovir (CDV), which is being developed as a medical countermeasure for the treatment of smallpox. BCV is active against double-stranded DNA viruses including BK and JC viruses. Here, we validated procedures for quantifying BCV and its pharmacologically active moiety cidofovir diphosphate (CDV-PP) in mouse kidney, brain and spleen tissue homogenates. Following homogenization, BCV and CDV-PP were extracted from the tissues by protein precipitation with their stable, isotopically labeled internal standards, BCV-d6 and 13 C3 15 N2 -CDV-PP. Then, samples were analyzed for BCV by reverse-phase chromatography on a Waters Xterra MS C18 (50 × 2.1 mm, 3.5 µm particle size) column while CDV-PP was analyzed on a Thermo BioBasic AX (50 × 2.1 mm, 5 µm particle size) column using anion exchange chromatography. Detection was achieved by electrospray ionization in positive ion mode on an AB Sciex API-5000 triple quadrupole mass spectrometer. The calibration curves were linear over a range of 1.00-1,000 ng/ml homogenate and 0.050-50.0 ng/ml homogenate for BCV and CDV-PP, respectively. These methods were validated according to US Food and Drug Administration guidance for industry and may be used to characterize the tissue pharmacology of both analytes to advance its preclinical development.

Esters of terpene alcohols as highly potent, reversible, and low toxic skin penetration enhancers.

Skin penetration/permeation enhancers are compounds that improve (trans)dermal drug delivery. We designed hybrid terpene-amino acid enhancers by conjugating natural terpenes (citronellol, geraniol, nerol, farnesol, linalool, perillyl alcohol, menthol, borneol, carveol) or cinnamyl alcohol with 6-(dimethylamino)hexanoic acid through a biodegradable ester linker. The compounds were screened for their ability to increase the delivery of theophylline and hydrocortisone through and into human skin ex vivo. The citronellyl, bornyl and cinnamyl esters showed exceptional permeation-enhancing properties (enhancement ratios up to 82) while having low cellular toxicities. The barrier function of enhancer-treated skin (assessed by transepidermal water loss and electrical impedance) recovered within 24 h. Infrared spectroscopy suggested that these esters fluidized the stratum corneum lipids. Furthermore, the citronellyl ester increased the epidermal concentration of topically applied cidofovir, which is a potent antiviral and anticancer drug, by 15-fold. In conclusion, citronellyl 6-(dimethylamino)hexanoate is an outstanding enhancer with an advantageous combination of properties, which may improve the delivery of drugs that have a limited ability to cross biological barriers.

Neutropenia and renal dysfunction due to intravesical cidofovir for virus-associated hemorrhagic cystitis after kidney and allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantations.

We present a patient with virus-associated hemorrhagic cystitis who underwent kidney and allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantations (allo-HSCT). Six months post-allo-HSCT, adenovirus hemorrhagic cystitis occurred, which has been in remission after a single dose of intravesical cidofovir. This might cause prolonged neutropenia and nephrotoxicity, suggesting cidofovir absorption in the blood.

Model of population pharmacokinetics of cidofovir in immunocompromised children with cytomegalovirus and adenovirus infection.

Objectives: To describe cidofovir pharmacokinetics and assess the link between concentration and safety/efficacy in children. Patients and methods: An observational study was conducted in 13 immunocompromised children receiving cidofovir for adenovirus and/or cytomegalovirus infection. A population pharmacokinetic model was built and AUC0-24 was derived for each patient. Virological success was defined as a decrease of the viraemia by ≥1 log10 copies/mL within 15 days of cidofovir initiation. The association between AUC0-24 and virological success was assessed using a Wilcoxon test. An AUC0-24 cut-off value was determined using a Fisher's exact test. Results: Overall, 86 blood samples were analysed. A two-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination best described the cidofovir data. Virological success (VS) was reached in 6/8 children with adenovirus viraemia and in 1/4 children with cytomegalovirus viraemia. Patients with VS displayed a non-significant higher median AUC0-24 compared with patients with virological failure: 48.6 (range 8.9-72.6) versus 19.1 (6.9-22.7) mg·h/L. Adenovirus-viraemic patients with an AUC0-24 value below 19.1 mg·h/L had a higher probability of treatment failure (P = 0.03). Aviraemic children with stool and/or nasopharyngeal adenovirus carriage cleared the viral carriage within a month of cidofovir initiation. During treatment, 1/13 children developed a tubulopathy but none of them had an increase in creatininaemia. Conclusions: Cidofovir appears safe and reasonably well tolerated and seemed to have efficacy in a subset of patients with adenovirus/cytomegalovirus infection. Therapeutic drug monitoring may be useful in children receiving cidofovir and, in the case of adenovirus infection, targeting an AUC0-24 above 19.1 mg·h/L could be associated with higher probability of virological success.