Do PCDD/PCDF standard solutions used in dioxin analysis pose a risk as potentially acutely toxic to lab personnel?

Laboratory safety requires protecting personnel from chemical exposures. Working with stock solutions of polychlorinated dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans (PCDD/PCDFs) in routine analysis of feed and food with bioanalytical or physicochemical methods raises some concerns. Since PCDD/PCDFs are considered as possibly acutely toxic, the potential risks were evaluated to determine whether supervision of their use is necessary. Based on LD50-data for oral or dermal intake, hazard classification of 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) as a substance (category 1) and in commercially available TCDD standard solutions (category 4) is different. As worst case exposure scenario during routine laboratory work it was assumed that a dose of 100 ng TCDD gets onto the skin and is absorbed. This would result in the total body burden of a 70 kg person with 15 kg fat increasing from 10 (upper range of current background levels) to ∼17 pg of toxic equivalents (TEQs) of PCDD/PCDFs per g lipid, a level commonly observed over past decades. Chloracne, the main acute effect occurring weeks after exposure, is observed at much higher blood concentrations than estimated from accidental laboratory exposure. Immunotoxicity, developmental effects and other toxic effects may occur at lower blood levels, but require longer periods to develop. Since acute toxic symptoms don't occur within an "8 h acute time window", no supervision is necessary when working with standard solutions in routine analysis. Nevertheless, precautionary measures are needed regarding long-term adverse health effects and appropriate workplace conditions must exist to ensure that additional occupational exposure to PCDD/PCDFs by laboratory personnel is negligible.

Chloracne: still cause for concern.

Chloracne, first described by Herxheimer in 1899, is a dermatosis consisting of more or less diffuse acneiform lesions distributed prevalently on the face and on body areas not usually affected by acne and caused by chronic or acute exposure to halogenated chemical compounds. Dioxin is the common name for dibenzo-p-dioxins and dibenzofurans, contaminants nearly ubiquitous in the environment and highly resistant to chemical and biological degradation. These compounds can survive for decades in the environment and accumulate in the human and animal food chains. Chloracne is characterized by the onset of numerous comedo-like lesions and yellowish cysts on the face, particularly on the cheeks, that can spread to the trunk and other body regions not usually affected by acne vulgaris, with diffuse grayish skin pigmentation and sometimes associated with hypertrichosis and areas of folliculitis. The lesions may occasionally be accompanied by skin or systemic manifestations. We report 9 cases of chloracne, 8 of them with rapid onset in patients residing in the same building, and 1 in a patient occupationally exposed to halogenated compounds. In our series, the doses of dioxin and polychlorinated biphenyls in the soil, water and plant material, and the serum titer of dioxin were within the normal range. This consideration raises the issue of the need to revise the serum threshold for dioxin poisoning and the environmental threshold. We wish also to underline the value of dermatopathology in the differential diagnosis of chloracne.