Tannenbaum and metal stents in the palliative treatment of malignant distal bile duct obstruction: a comparative study of patency and cost effectiveness.

BACKGROUND: Stent clogging is the major limitation of palliative treatment for malignant biliary obstruction. Metal stents have much better patency than plastic stents, but are more expensive. Preliminary data suggest that the recently designed plastic (Tannenbaum) stent has better duration of patency than the polyethylene stent. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and cost effectiveness between the Tannenbaum stent without side holes and the uncovered metal stent for patients with malignant distal common bile duct obstruction. METHODS: In this study, 47 patients (median age, 73 years, range, 56-86 years) with inoperable malignant distal common bile duct strictures were prospectively randomized to receive either a Tannenbaum stent (n = 24) or an uncovered self-expandable metal stent (n = 23). The patients were clinically evaluated, and biochemical tests were analyzed if necessary until their death or surgery for gastric outlet obstruction. Cumulative first stent patency and patient survival were compared between the two groups. Cost-effectiveness analysis also was performed for the two study groups. RESULTS: The two groups were comparable in terms of age, gender, and diagnosis. The median first stent patency was longer in the metal group than in the Tannenbaum stent group (255 vs 123.5 days; p = 0.002). There was no significant difference in survival between the two groups. The total cost associated with the Tannenbaum stents was lower than for the metal stents (17,700 vs 30,100 euros; p = 0.001), especially for patients with liver metastases (3,000 vs 6,900 euros; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Metal stent placement is an effective treatment for inoperable malignant distal common bile duct obstruction, but Tannenbaum stent placement is a cost-saving strategy, as compared with metal stent placement, especially for patients with liver metastases and expected short survival time.

[More successful and cost effective--the non-transendoscopic method of TPCD]. / Erfolgreicher und kostensparender--die nicht-transendoskopische Methode der TPCD.

With TPCD best results are gained with large diameter endoprostheses. In this instance special duodenoscopes with a working channel of 3.2 or 4.2 mm are needed for the implantation of 10 or 12 French endoprostheses. Alternatively, using the non-transendoscopic technique large diameter endoprostheses of 14 or more French can be implanted independently from the diameter of the working channel with conventional endoscopes. We have used this method developed at our institution in 1204 patients since 1982 and compared its results with 192 patients in whom the transendoscopic technique with 7-10 French endoprostheses was administered. The success-rate (non-transendoscopic technique 94 vs transendoscopic technique 79%), early complications (5 vs 11%), method-specific mortality (0.3 vs 1%), in-hospital mortality (3.6 vs 21%) and late complications (19 vs 33%) are clearly in favour of the non-transendoscopic approach. The higher rate of early complications and consecutively higher in-hospital mortality of the transendoscopic method with 7-10 French endoprostheses was mainly due to frequent episodes of early cholangitis due to insufficient biliary drainage. The higher success-rate of the non-transendoscopic approach is method specific ("Prothesenleger" guidable). A change of the endoscope is not necessary in contradiction to the transendoscopic method. Additional costs of special duodenoscopes that can be used neither for ERCP nor sphincterotomy are superfluous.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)