Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Perinatol ; 44(7): 1042-1049, 2024 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38155229

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Term infants born to mothers with chorioamnionitis are at risk for early-onset sepsis (EOS). We aimed to measure the impact of changing from a categorical to a modified-observational EOS screening approach on NICU admission, antibiotic utilization, and hospitalization costs. STUDY DESIGN: Single-center retrospective pre-post cohort study of full-term infants born to mothers with chorioamnionitis. Primary outcomes included NICU admission, antibiotic utilization, and hospitalization costs. Outcomes were adjusted for demographic variables. Budget-impact analysis was performed using bootstrapping with replication. RESULTS: 380 term infants were included (197 categorical; 183 modified-observational). There was a significant decrease in NICU admission and antibiotic utilization (p < 0.05) in the modified-observational cohort but no significant difference in per-patient total hospitalization costs. Budget-impact analysis suggested a high probability of cost savings. CONCLUSION: A modified-observational approach to evaluating term infants of mothers with chorioamnionitis can reduce NICU admission and unnecessary antibiotic therapy, and may lead to cost-savings.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Corioamnionite , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva Neonatal , Humanos , Corioamnionite/diagnóstico , Corioamnionite/economia , Feminino , Gravidez , Estudos Retrospectivos , Recém-Nascido , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva Neonatal/economia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Antibacterianos/economia , Adulto , Masculino , Hospitalização/economia , Custos Hospitalares/estatística & dados numéricos , Sepse Neonatal/diagnóstico , Sepse Neonatal/economia
2.
Am J Perinatol ; 36(4): 399-405, 2019 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30130822

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To assess the costs, complication rates, and harm-benefit tradeoffs of induction of labor (IOL) compared to scheduled cesarean delivery (CD) in women with class III obesity. STUDY DESIGN: We conducted a cost analysis of IOL versus scheduled CD in nulliparous morbidly obese women. Primary outcomes were surgical site infection (SSI), chorioamnionitis, venous thromboembolism, blood transfusion, and readmission. Model outcomes were mean cost of each strategy, cost per complication avoided, and complication tradeoffs. We assessed the costs, complication rates, and harm-benefit tradeoffs of IOL compared with scheduled CD in women with class III obesity. RESULTS: A total of 110 patients underwent scheduled CD and 114 underwent IOL, of whom 61 (54%) delivered via cesarean. The group delivering vaginally experienced fewer complications. SSI occurred in 0% in the vaginal delivery group, 13% following scheduled cesarean, and 16% following induction then cesarean. In the decision model, the mean cost of induction was $13,349 compared with $14,575 for scheduled CD. Scheduled CD costs $9,699 per case of chorioamnionitis avoided, resulted in 18 cases of chorioamnionitis avoided per additional SSI and 3 cases of chorioamnionitis avoided per additional hospital readmission. In sensitivity analysis, IOL is cost saving compared with scheduled CD unless the cesarean rate following induction exceeds 70%. CONCLUSION: In morbidly obese women, induction of labor remains cost-saving until the rate of cesarean following induction exceeds 70%.


Assuntos
Cesárea/economia , Trabalho de Parto Induzido/economia , Obesidade Mórbida , Complicações na Gravidez , Índice de Massa Corporal , Corioamnionite/economia , Corioamnionite/prevenção & controle , Análise Custo-Benefício , Feminino , Humanos , Trabalho de Parto Induzido/efeitos adversos , Modelos Econométricos , Gravidez
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...