Children's injuries in legislated types child-care institutions.

BACKGROUND: Severe injuries in child-care institutions are an important social issue. However, no reports on this matter have been made in Japan. This study examined trends in severe injuries at child-care institutions, including the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. METHODS: We conducted a serial cross-sectional study and interrupted time-series (ITS) analysis with a linear regression model to assess trends in the incidence rate of severe injuries using Japanese national open data between January or April 2017 and December 2021. Participants were individuals utilizing legislated types child-care institutions. The outcomes were annual and monthly incidence rates of severe injuries in legislated types child-care institutions. RESULTS: The number of legislated types child-care institutions increased from 32,793 facilities in 2017 to 38,666 facilities in 2021, and the number of participants rose from 2,802,228 in 2017 to 3,059,734 in 2021. The annual incidence rate of severe injuries in 2021 was 58.3 cases per 100,000 person-years, which is twofold higher than that in 2017. The ITS for the monthly incidence rate demonstrated an increasing trend before the COVID-19 pandemic. CONCLUSIONS: Before the COVID-19 pandemic, the monthly incidence rate of severe injuries in legislated types child-care institutions increased. The annual incidence rate in Japan may have also increased during the observation period.

Opportunities to Promote Healthy Weight Through Child Care Licensing Regulations: Trends in the United States, 2016-2020.

BACKGROUND: Policies that support healthy nutrition and physical activity environments in early care and education (ECE) settings can help promote healthy weight in children. State child care licensing regulations are a critical mechanism for setting such policies. OBJECTIVES: To develop a research instrument to evaluate the promotion of healthy child weight in state child care licensing regulations and assess the strength of the regulations over time. DESIGN: For measure development, systematic reviews of evidence on the impact of healthy weight strategies relevant to the ECE environment were combined with expert stakeholder input to identify 15 healthy weight promotion policy standards and a coding tool to measure the strength and comprehensiveness of regulatory language matching these standards. For assessing the strength of regulations, the coding tool was applied to child care regulations nationwide in 2016 and again in 2020. SUBJECTS/SETTING: Child care licensing regulations in 2016 and 2020 for all 50 US states plus Washington DC. OUTCOME MEASURES: Strength and comprehensiveness scores for state licensing regulations. STATISTICAL ANALYSES: Intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated to estimate interrater reliability of the coding tool. Paired t tests were used to compare scores within states from 2016 to 2020. RESULTS: Interrater reliability for the coding tool had intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.81 for strength and 0.87 for comprehensiveness scores. Strength and comprehensiveness of states' healthy weight promotion policies increased significantly over time (P < .001). However, most states still lack important healthy weight policies in their licensing regulations, such as prohibiting serving sugary drinks. CONCLUSIONS: This study presents a reliable research instrument for measuring the strength and comprehensiveness of healthy weight promotion standards in child care licensing regulations. States have increased their incorporation of strategies for healthy weight into state policy.

Alignment of State Regulations With Breastfeeding and Beverage Best Practices for Childcare Centers and Family Childcare Homes, United States.

OBJECTIVES: Childcare is an important setting for nutrition; nearly half of young children in the United States participate in licensed childcare, where they consume up to two-thirds of their daily dietary intake. We compared state regulations for childcare with best practices to support breastfeeding and healthy beverage provision. METHODS: We reviewed regulations for childcare centers (centers) and family childcare homes (homes) in effect May-July 2016 and rated all 50 states for inclusion (1 = not included, 2 = partially included, 3 = fully included) of 12 breastfeeding and beverage best practices. We calculated average ratings for 6 practices specific to infants aged 0-11 months, 6 practices specific to children aged 1-6 years, and all 12 practices, by state and across all states. We assessed significant differences between centers and homes for each best practice by using McNemar-Bowker tests for symmetry, and we assessed differences across states by using paired student t tests. RESULTS: States included best practices in regulations for centers more often than for homes. Average ratings (standard deviations) in regulations across all states were significantly higher in centers than in homes for infant best practices (2.1 [0.5] vs 1.8 [0.5], P < .001), child best practices (2.1 [0.6] vs 1.8 [0.6], P = .002), and all 12 best practices combined (2.1 [0.5] vs 1.8 [0.6], P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Although best practices were more consistently included in regulations for centers than for homes, many state childcare regulations did not include best practices to support breastfeeding and the provision of healthy beverages. Findings can be used to inform efforts to improve regulations and to reduce differences between centers and homes.

Status of Beverages Served to Young Children in Child Care After Implementation of California Policy, 2012-2016.

INTRODUCTION: Since 2012, licensed California child care centers and homes, per state policy, are required to serve only unflavored low-fat or nonfat milk to children aged 2 years or older, no more than one serving of 100% juice daily, and no beverages with added sweeteners, and they are required to ensure that drinking water is readily accessible throughout the day. We evaluated adherence to the policy after 4 years in comparison to the adherence evaluation conducted shortly after the policy went into effect. METHODS: Licensed California child care sites were randomly selected in 2012 and 2016 and surveyed about beverage practices and provisions to children aged 1-5 years. We used logistic regression to analyze between-year differences for all sites combined and within-year differences by site type and participation in the federal Child and Adult Care Food Program (CACFP) in self-reported policy adherence and beverage provisions. RESULTS: Respondents in 2016 (n = 680), compared with those in 2012 (n = 435), were more adherent to California's 2010 Healthy Beverages in Child Care Act overall (45.1% vs 27.2%, P < .001) and with individual provisions for milk (65.0% vs 41.4%, P < .001), 100% juice (91.2% vs 81.5%, P < .001), and sugar-sweetened beverages (97.4% vs 93.4%, P = .006). In 2016, centers compared with homes (48.5% vs 28.0%, P = .001) and CACFP sites compared with non-CACFP sites (51.6% vs 27.9%, P < .001) were more adherent to AB2084 overall. DISCUSSION: Beverage policy adherence in California child care has improved since 2012 and is higher in CACFP sites and centers. Additional policy promotion and implementation support is encouraged for non-CACFP sites and homes. Other states should consider adopting such policies.

A natural experiment of state-level physical activity and screen-time policy changes early childhood education (ECE) centers and child physical activity.

BACKGROUND: Early childhood education (ECE) centers are an important place for preschool-aged children to obtain physical activity (PA). A U.S. state government (Louisiana) recently updated requirements for licensed centers' PA and screen-time policies, which allowed for assessment of 1) ECE center practices, environment, staff behaviors, and policies changes on child-level PA and 2) state level changes on the ECE center. METHODS: ECE centers were assessed at the beginning of state licensing changes and 1-year later. The ECE centers were assessed via the Environmental Policy Assessment and Observation (EPAO) tool. The EPAO Sedentary Opportunities score, which primarily assesses television viewing time, was revised to reflect viewing non-television devices (e.g. tablets). Child-level PA was measured using accelerometry. For Aim 1, mixed models assessed ECE center changes and child PA with adjustment for demographic characteristics (fixed effects), baseline EPAO score (random effects), and clustering for center. For Aim 2, paired t-tests assessed ECE center environment differences between baseline and follow-up. RESULTS: Nine ECE centers participated and 49 preschoolers provided complete measures at both time points. For Aim 1, increases in the EPAO revised-Sedentary Opportunities score (as in less non-television screen-time) resulted in increased child PA (p = 0.02). For Aim 2, ECE centers improved their EPAO Active Opportunities and Staff Behaviors score (p = 0.04 and p = 0.02 respectively). CONCLUSIONS: ECE centers improved their environment after 1-year, resulting in additional child PA. Changes in ECE centers environment, possibly through policy, can positively influence children's PA.

Child Care Setting and Its Association With Policies and Practices That Promote Physical Activity and Physical Literacy in the Early Years in British Columbia.

BACKGROUND: Physical activity (PA) is critical to early child development, and child care is a key setting for promotion. The authors investigated differences in daily PA and sedentary behavior practices as well as physical environments between family child care (FCC) and group child care (GCC) settings for children aged 3-5 years in Canada. METHODS: Group child care (n = 581) and FCC (n = 357) managers completed surveys assessing the implementation of PA promoting practices and description of their environments. Crosstabulation and chi-square tests of association were used to examine differences between GCC and FCC. RESULTS: The prevalence of facilities implementing 120 minutes of active play (odds ratio [OR] 2.23; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.58-3.15), <30 minutes on screens (OR 1.35; 95% CI, 1.02-1.80), and 60-minute outdoors daily (OR 1.99; 95% CI, 1.4-2.9) was more likely in FCC compared with GCC. However, implementation of fundamental movement skill activities (OR 1.40; 95% CI, 1.01-1.92), breaking up prolonged sitting (OR 1.86; 95% CI, 1.36-2.5), and outdoor space for large group running games (OR 1.74; 95% CI, 1.07-2.83) were more likely in GCC. CONCLUSIONS: Child care setting was associated with daily PA and sedentary practices and outdoor space for PA. Interventions to support PA in child care should be tailored to different settings and the facilitators explored.

Influenza Vaccine Requirements in United States Child Care Centers.

BACKGROUND: Influenza vaccine is the most effective means to prevent influenza for the high-risk population of child care attendees. This national survey assessed child care center directors' reports of seasonal influenza vaccine requirements for children and adult caregivers. METHODS: This was a 2016 telephone-based survey of child care center directors randomly selected from a national database of licensed United States child care centers and queried about influenza vaccine requirements. Conceptually related items were grouped into 4 indexes: general infection control, use of health consultants, quality of child care, and pandemic influenza preparedness. These indexes, along with other center and director characteristics, were used to predict director-reported influenza vaccine requirements. RESULTS: Of 518 child care center directors, only 24.5% and 13.1% reported an influenza vaccine requirement for children and adult caregivers, respectively. Center and director characteristics and the indexes were not associated with a director-reported influenza vaccine requirement. After adjusting for covariates, only having a state influenza vaccine law for children and an adult influenza vaccine requirement predicted having a child influenza vaccine requirement. Only having a child influenza vaccine requirement predicted having an adult vaccine requirement. CONCLUSIONS: Director-reported influenza vaccine requirements for children and adult caregivers were influenced primarily by state influenza vaccine laws. Given the high risk of children in child care and low director-reported influenza vaccine requirements, more states should pass laws requiring influenza vaccine for children and adult caregivers at child care programs.

State Regulations to Support Children's Cultural and Religious Food Preferences in Early Care and Education.

OBJECTIVE: In July 2018 the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics released a benchmark encouraging early care and education (ECE) programs, including child care centers and family child care homes, to incorporate cultural and religious food preferences of children into meals. We examined the extent to which states were already doing so through their ECE licensing and administrative regulations prior to the release of the benchmark. This review may serve as a baseline to assess future updates, if more states incorporate the benchmark into their regulations. METHODS: For this cross-sectional study, we reviewed ECE regulations for all 50 states and the District of Columbia (hereafter states) through June 2018. We assessed consistency with the benchmark for centers and homes. We conducted Spearman correlations to estimate associations between the year the regulations were updated and consistency with the benchmark. RESULTS: Among centers, eight states fully met the benchmark, 11 partially met the benchmark, and 32 did not meet the benchmark. Similarly for homes, four states fully met the benchmark, 13 partially met the benchmark, and 34 did not meet the benchmark. Meeting the benchmark was not correlated with the year of last update for centers (P = 0.54) or homes (P = 0.31). CONCLUSIONS: Most states lacked regulations consistent with the benchmark. Health professionals can help encourage ECE programs to consider cultural and religious food preferences of children in meal planning. And, if feasible, states may consider additional regulations supporting cultural and religious preferences of children in future updates to regulations.

Preventing unintentional injuries in US early care and education: Are state regulations sufficient?

Unintentional injuries are currently the leading cause of death among US children older than one. As many children spend significant time in non-parental child care, these injuries often occur outside of the home. This study examined US state early care and education (ECE) regulations related to injury prevention. We reviewed ECE regulations for child care centers and family child care homes through August 2018 for all 50 states and DC ("states"). We compared these regulations to six components from two national health and safety standards on injury prevention ("standards"). One state had regulations that met all six standards for both centers and homes; sixteen states had regulations that met at least five for both. Most states required child care providers to be trained in emergency preparedness (42 for centers; 38 for homes) or first aid including CPR (50 for centers; 46 for homes). Additionally, most states required providers in centers and homes to notify parents (47 and 41, respectively) and the state (40 and 41, respectively) when a child was injured; these requirements varied greatly in both the timing and manner of notification. Two-thirds of states required that providers keep copies of a completed injury form on the premises. However, few states (5 for centers, 3 for homes) required providers to take corrective action after an injury. Although most states had some injury prevention regulations, they varied greatly across states. More states should require corrective action after an injury to help prevent future injuries from occurring.

L'assoluzione delle vaccinazioni obbligatorie come condizione per l'accesso agli asili comunali: tra tutela della salute (collettiva) e libertà di scelta individuale / The execution of compulsory vaccination as requirement for the access to public nurseries: balancing protection of (collective) health and individual self determination / Las vacunas obligatorias como condición para el acceso a las guarderías municipales: entre la protección de la salud (colectiva) y la libertad de elección individual / Les vacunes obligatòries com a condició per a l'accés a les guarderies municipals: entre la protecció de la salut (col·lectiva) i la llibertat d'elecció individual

La nota analizza la sentenza n. 20 del 2017 del T.A.R. Friuli Venezia Giulia che affronta in maniera approfondita la legittimità di un regolamento comunale che subordina l'accesso agli asili comunali all'esecuzione delle vaccinazioni obbligatorie. Inizialmente, vengono analizzati i diritti e i principi in gioco (diritto alla salute, principio di proporzionalità, principio di precauzione, diritto dei genitori di crescere i figli conformemente alle proprie convinzioni) nel bilanciamento che ne fa il Giudice. In seguito, traendo spunto da alcune affermazioni contenute nella sentenza, vengono considerati da un lato lo spazio che nel processo possono trovare teorie scientifiche minoritarie -o comunque contrarie rispetto a quelle ufficialmente seguite dalla competente autorità pubblica- e, dall'altro, la prospettiva filosofica seguita dal Giudice nel risolvere la questione sottopostagli

The aim of the paper is to analyze the decision n. 20/2017 of the Regional Administrative Court of the Friuli Venezia Giulia Region. This decision deals with the legitimacy of a municipal regulation, which delimitate the access to municipal nurseries to whom has been previously subjected to compulsory vaccinations. The rights and principles at a stake (healthcare right, the proportionality principle, the precautionary principle, the right of parents to grow their children in accordance with their convictions) will be firstly analyzed according to the reasoning of the judge. Subsequently, by taking into consideration some of the statements contained in this judgment, the paper will focus on the possibility for minority scientific theories -the ones contrary to those officially followed by the competent public authority- vto find their voice during a trial and, on the other hand, the paper will also consider the philosophical perspective followed by the judge in his reasoning

El artículo analiza la sentencia n. 20/2017 de la Corte Administrativa Regional de Friuli Venecia Giulia. La decisión se refiere a la legitimidad de una normativa municipal que limita el acceso a las guarderías municipales a los niños que previamente se han sometido a vacunaciones obligatorias. Los derechos y principios en juego (derecho a la salud, principio de proporcionalidad, principio de precaución, derecho de los padres a criar a sus hijos de acuerdo con sus convicciones) serán analizados, en primer lugar, atendiendo al razonamiento del juez. Posteriormente, y tomando en consideración algunas de las afirmaciones contenidas en esta sentencia, el artículo se centra en la posibilidad que las teorías científicas minoritarias -las contrarias a las oficialmente admitidas por la autoridad pública competente- encuentren su voz durante un juicio y, por otro lado, también se analiza la perspectiva filosófica adoptada por el juez en su razonamiento

L'article analitza la sentència núm. 20/2017 de la Cort Regional Administrativa de Friuli Venècia Giulia. La decisió es refereix a la legitimitat d'una normativa municipal que restringeix l'accés a les guarderies municipals als infants que prèviament s'han sotmès a vacunacions obligatòries. Els drets i principis en joc (dret a la salut, principi de proporcionalitat, principi de precaució, dret dels pares a criar als seus fills d'acord amb les seves conviccions) seran analitzats, en primer lloc, atenent al raonament del jutge. Posteriorment, i prenent en consideració algunes de les afirmacions contingudes en aquesta sentència, l’article se centra en la possibilitat que les teories científiques minoritàries -les contràries a les oficialment admeses per l'autoritat pública competent- trobin la seva veu durant un judici i, d'altra banda, també s’analitza la perspectiva filosòfica adoptada pel jutge en el seu raonament

Implementation Strategies Used by States to Support Physical Activity Licensing Standards for Toddlers in Early Care and Education Settings: An Exploratory Qualitative Study.

BACKGROUND: Child care settings have been a target for childhood obesity prevention efforts; changing licensing standards to require physical activity (PA)-related best practices is one strategy being used by states. The mechanisms used to support implementation by providers remain understudied, despite the potential for these efforts to significantly impact child-level outcomes. This qualitative study explored the mechanisms used and any outstanding challenges to implementation experienced by US states with one specific best practice PA licensing standard for toddlers (60-90 min of PA/day). METHODS: All states with the selected PA licensing standard were invited to participate (N = 9). Interviews were conducted with the licensing administrator and others in the state involved with implementation and referred by the Administrator (e.g., Licensing Inspectors). A total of 20 individuals from seven states were interviewed. All interviews were recorded, professionally transcribed, and analyzed to identify themes. RESULTS: A range of strategies was reported, however the majority of interviewees reported that providers experienced few challenges with implementation. Steps taken during the rulemaking process and technical assistance provided by licensing staff, government and nonprofit partners were frequently mentioned as contributing to implementation success. Challenges faced by licensing staff included lack of resources and a need for specific, age-appropriate PA-promoting activities that providers could easily implement. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the experience of participating states, other jurisdictions may want to explore adding PA-related requirements to their licensing standards. The lessons learned from these seven states may be helpful during the rulemaking and implementation processes.

Center-Reported Adherence to Nutrition Standards of the Child and Adult Care Food Program.

BACKGROUND: The Child and Adult Care Food Program (CACFP) sets nutrition standards for foods served in participating settings. Licensing regulations in many states, including Connecticut (CT), extend these rules to nonparticipating facilities. This study evaluates the food environment for preschool-age children in CT child care centers and describes center-reported adherence to the CACFP nutrition regulations. METHODS: We surveyed directors of licensed CACFP-participating and non-CACFP centers that served meals and/or snacks. Food served, caregiver feeding behavior, nutrition practices and policies, and CACFP knowledge were reported by 256 non-CACFP and 87 CACFP centers. We conducted bivariate analyses to describe adherence to the CACFP regulations as reported by CACFP and nonparticipating centers. Data were collected in 2015-2016 and analyzed in 2017. RESULTS: CACFP centers reported more engagement in recommended feeding and nutrition practices than non-CACFP centers, including serving more fresh fruit and whole grains at snack time, serving low-fat milk for meals/snacks, and use of family style dining and positive caregiver behaviors. No center reported serving soda, only a few had fruit drinks, and the majority prohibited parents from sending in sugary drinks. Despite the licensing regulations about compliance with the CACFP nutrition standards, 52% of non-CACFP centers had never heard of CACFP and only 21% received information about following the CACFP standards and practices. CONCLUSIONS: CACFP participation is associated with better center-reported adherence to the CACFP nutrition standards and feeding practices. Poor awareness about CACFP among nonparticipating centers needs to be addressed to improve compliance with the CACFP nutrition standards.

State Regulations Promoting Infant Physical Activity in Early Care and Education.

BACKGROUND: State policies have the potential to improve early care and education (ECE) settings, but little is known about the extent to which states are updating their licensing and administrative regulations, especially in response to national calls to action. In 2013, we assessed state regulations promoting infant physical activity in ECE and compared them with national recommendations. To assess change over time, we conducted this review again in 2018. METHODS: We reviewed regulations for all US states for child care centers (centers) and family child care homes (homes) and compared them with three national recommendations: (1) provide daily tummy time; (2) use cribs, car seats, and high chairs for their primary purpose; and (3) limit the use of restrictive equipment (e.g., strollers). We performed exact McNemar's tests to compare the number of states meeting recommendations from 2013 to 2018 to evaluate whether states had made changes over this period. RESULTS: From 2013 to 2018, we observed significant improvement in one recommendation for homes-to use cribs, car seats, and high chairs for their primary purpose (odds ratio 11.0; 95% CI 1.6-47.3; p = 0.006). We did not observe any other significant difference between 2013 and 2018 regulations. CONCLUSIONS: Despite increased awareness of the importance of early-life physical activity, we observed only modest improvement in the number of states meeting infant physical activity recommendations over the past 5 years. In practice, ECE programs may be promoting infant physical activity, but may not be required to do so through state regulations.

State Licensing Regulations on Screen Time in Childcare Centers: An Impetus for Participatory Action Research.

BACKGROUND: New licensing regulations require Louisiana early care and education centers (ECEs) to limit children's screen time and increase physical activity. A community- academic partnership involving academic, community, government, and ECE stakeholders launched two initiatives: (1) an evaluation of the implementation of licensing regulations at the local level and (2) a statewide effort to develop technical assistance for ECE directors. OBJECTIVES: To describe the methods and lessons learned and to establish recommendations based on this ongoing participatory action research. METHODS: A case study approach was used to identify the lessons learned and recommendations thus far, based on partners' perspectives and ECE directors' participation. LESSONS LEARNED: Recommendations include to share power and funding among stakeholders, to engage directors as partners to overcome recruitment challenges, and to start with the end in mind to ensure meaningful community engagement. CONCLUSIONS: This participatory action approach is leading to innovative, feasible strategies to increase children's physical activity.

Physical activity and sedentary behavior legislation in Canadian childcare facilities: an update.

BACKGROUND: Within the childcare sector, physical activity and sedentary behaviors are not legislated at a national level in Canada. Efforts have been undertaken to identify factors within childcare facilities which support and deter physical activity and sedentary behaviors. The purpose of this paper was to provide an amended review of the legislative landscape, at the provincial and territorial level, regarding physical activity and sedentary behaviors (via screen-viewing) in Canadian childcare centers. METHODS: Individual childcare acts and regulations for each province and territory were collected; documents were reviewed with a focus on sections devoted to child health, physical activity, screen time, play, and outdoor time. An extraction table was used to facilitate systematic data retrieval and comparisons across provinces and territories. RESULTS: Of the 13 provinces and territories, 8 (62%) have updated their childcare regulations in the past 5 years. All provinces provide general recommendations to afford gross motor movement; but the majority give no specific requirements for how much or at what intensity. Only 3 provinces (Northwest Territories, Nunavut, and Nova Scotia) explicitly mentioned daily physical activity while all provinces' and territories' required daily outdoor play. Only 1 province (New Brunswick) made mention of screen-viewing. CONCLUSIONS: The variability in childcare regulations results in different physical activity requirements across the country. By providing high-level targets for physical activity recommendations, by way of provincial/territorial legislation, staff would have a baseline from which to begin supporting more active behaviors among the children in their care. Future research is needed to support translating physical activity policies into improved activity levels among young children in childcare and the role of screen-viewing in these venues.

Childcare Providers' Possession or Use of Marijuana, Tobacco, or Alcohol While Caring for Children: A Comparison of US State Regulations.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate US state regulations regarding marijuana, tobacco, and alcohol to determine the extent to which states attempt to govern these substances in early care and education (ECE) settings. METHODS: Two independent reviewers assessed regulations enacted by December 2016 for all states and the District of Columbia. Reviewers compared regulations to national standards on the possession or use of marijuana, tobacco, and alcohol in ECE settings. RESULTS: Fewer states regulated marijuana than tobacco or alcohol in ECE settings. More states restricted the use of these 3 substances than they restricted the possession of them. CONCLUSIONS: Most states address alcohol or tobacco possession or use in their regulations but should consider updating these provisions to align with national standards. Public Health Implications. Updating and strengthening state childcare regulations regarding marijuana, tobacco, and alcohol possession and use may help protect children in ECE settings, where many children spend a substantial portion of time. As more states legalize marijuana, they may consider updating their regulations and including precise language to better protect children from unintended pediatric marijuana exposure or impaired childcare providers.

Nutrition-related practices in kindergartens in the context of changes to legal regulations on foodstuffs used in canteen menus for children

Background: In order to improve the quality of nutrition in care and educational institutions, in year 2015 a restrictive law regulation was introduced. The following year this regulation was withdrawn, and a new legal policy has been introduced. However, data on the impact of these legislations on nutrition in kindergartens are lacking. Objective: The aim of the study was to evaluate the compliance with mandatory nutrition recommendations in preschools. Material and methods: The study included 706 institutions. Data were collected during the periods when two consecutive Regulation of the Minister of Health were in force (I - 01.09.2015 - 31.08. 2016 and II - 01.09.2016 to 30.05.2017). Data were obtained by face-to-face interviews with staff with a validated questionnaire. Parameters characterizing the quality of nutrition were analyzed with focus on compliance with legal regulations. 706 decade's menus and 7060 daily inventory reports were analyzed to verify information on vegetables and fruit supply, frequency of frying and type of fat used, sweetening and salting practices. Statistical significances were determined in Statistica 13.1 with t-Student and Chi2 tests (p< 0.05).The study included 706 institutions. Data were collected during the periods when two consecutive Regulation of the Minister of Health were in force (I - 01.09.2015 - 31.08. 2016 and II - 01.09.2016 to 30.05.2017). Data were obtained by face-to-face interviews with staff with a validated questionnaire. Parameters characterizing the quality of nutrition were analyzed with focus on compliance with legal regulations. 706 decade's menus and 7060 daily inventory reports were analyzed to verify information on vegetables and fruit supply, frequency of frying and type of fat used, sweetening and salting practices. Statistical significances were determined in Statistica 13.1 with t-Student and Chi2 tests (p< 0.05). Results: The preschools have implemented regulations concerning the supply of fresh fruit and vegetables (~93%), the amount of fried dish per week (~75%), and the use of suitable frying fat (~95%). About half of institutions managed to serve vegetables and/or fruits in every meal. Compliance with the regulations on sweetening and salting was unsatisfactory: about » of institutions used banned sugar, and 46% regular salt. Conclusions: Legislations influenced nutrition practices in preschools, but additional support is needed to bring all institutions into compliance with the current policies. The current law regulations are general, and allow a great flexibility in planning menus, which might has an adverse effect on menus quality. Therefore, nutrition education and more detailed mandatory nutrition standards for kindergartens are crucial.

Media and Young Minds: Comparing State Screen Media Use Regulations for Children Under 24 Months of Age in Early Care and Education to a National Standard.

Introduction Excessive screen media use has been associated with a number of negative health outcomes in young children, including increased risk for obesity and comparatively lagging cognitive development. The purpose of this study was to assess state licensing regulations restricting screen media use for children under 24 months old in early care and education (ECE) and to compare regulations to a national standard. Methods We reviewed screen media use regulations for all US states for child care centers ("centers") and family child care homes ("homes") and compared these regulations to a national standard discouraging screen media use in children under 24 months of age. We assessed associations between state geographic region and year of last update with the presence of regulations consistent with the standard. In centers, 24 states had regulations limiting screen media use for children under 24 months of age and 19 states had regulations limiting screen media use in homes. Results More states in the South and fewer states in the Midwest had regulations limiting screen media use. The association between geographic region and regulations was not significant for centers (p = 0.06), but was for homes (p = 0.04). The year of last update (within the past 5 years versus older than 5 years) was not associated with regulations for centers (p = 0.18) or homes (p = 0.90). Discussion Many states lacked screen media use regulations for ECE. States should consider adding screen media use restrictions for children under 24 months based on current research data and current recommendations in future regulations updates.

State-Mandated Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Screen Time Policies in Child Care Centers.

BACKGROUND: The child care center (CCC) environment presents opportunities for healthy weight promotion in preschoolers. Our study examined the current state of CCC adherence to nutrition, physical activity, and screen time legislative regulations and the differences in their adherence by center socioeconomic position (SEP: low, middle, high) in Miami-Dade County. METHOD: In 34 CCC, we used the Environment and Policy Assessment and Observation tool to evaluate nutrition, physical activity, and screen time practices during 1-school day. RESULTS: Twenty-five of the centers (73.5%) were participants of the Child and Adult Care Food Program. Almost 80% of the centers adhered to serving low-fat/fat-free milk to children older than 2 years. Only 34.5% served vegetables and 75.9% served whole fruits during meals/snacks. Ninety-four percent of the centers had quiet and active play incorporated into their daily routines. All centers adhered to the 2-hour screen time limit for children older than 2 years. Low- and middle-SEP centers fared better in the serving of fruits, vegetables, and low-fat/fat-free milk. The centers averaged 1 hour in outdoor play regardless of SEP. High-SEP centers had no TV or screen time during day of observation. CONCLUSION: CCC practices highlight opportunities for improvement in nutrition, physical activity, and screen time practices in the prevention of overweight in early childhood.