Comparison of warfarin, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran for effectiveness and safety in atrial fibrillation patients with different CHA2DS2-VASc scores: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: This retrospective cohort study aims to compare the effectiveness and safety of warfarin, rivaroxaban, and dabigatran in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with different CHA2DS2-VASc scores in northern China. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed to evaluate anticoagulation in AF patients at the second affiliated hospital of Harbin Medical University from September 2018 to August 2019. Patients included in this study (n = 806) received warfarin (n = 300), or rivaroxaban (n = 203), or dabigatran (n = 303). Baseline characteristics and follow-up data including adherence, bleeding events and ischemic stroke (IS) events were collected. RESULTS: Patients receiving rivaroxaban (73.9%) or dabigatran (73.6%) showed better adherence than those receiving warfarin (56.7%). Compared with warfarin-treated patients, dabigatran-treated patients had lower incidence of bleeding events (10.9% vs 19.3%, χ2 = 8.385, P = 0.004) and rivaroxaban-treated patients had lower incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (7.4% vs 13.7%, χ2 = 4.822, P = 0.028). We classified patients into three groups based on CHA2DS2-VASc score (0-1, 2-3, ≥ 4). In dabigatran intervention, incidence of bleeding events was higher in patients with score 0-1 (20.0%) than those with score 2-3 (7.9%, χ2 = 5.772, P = 0.016) or score ≥ 4 (8.6%, χ2 = 4.682, P = 0.030). Patients with score 0-1 in warfarin or rivaroxaban therapy had a similar but not significant increase of bleeding compared with patients with score 2-3 or score ≥ 4, respectively. During the follow-up, 33 of 806 patients experienced IS and more than half (19, 57.6%) were patients with score ≥ 4. Comparing patients with score 0-1 and 2-3, the latter had an significant reduction of IS in patients prescribed warfarin and non-significant reduction in rivaroxaban and dabigatran therapy. CONCLUSION: Compared with warfarin therapy, patients with different CHA2DS2-VASc scores receiving either rivaroxaban or dabigatran were associated with higher persistence. AF patients with score ≥ 4 were more likely to experience IS events while hemorrhagic tendency preferred patients with low score 0-1.

Selection criteria for anticoagulants: survey of Japanese cardiologists based on their daily clinical practice: the Selection DOAC study.

BACKGROUND: In patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been utilized as an alternative to warfarin, which is known to have several limitations. This study aimed to clarify the selection criteria for anticoagulants, considering both individual patient factors and the differences between various drugs. METHODS: This study conducted a web-based questionnaire from September 20, 2023 to October 3, 2023, among physicians who were members of a cardiology-specific website. RESULTS: In total, 172 respondents were enrolled in this study. Edoxaban was the most frequently selected anticoagulant (39.1%), followed by apixaban (32.7%) and rivaroxaban (16.8%). Logistic regression analysis revealed that increased concern for adherence enhanced the frequency of selecting edoxaban (odds ratio [OR] = 2.42; p = 0.047), with the opposite trend observed for dabigatran (OR = 0.404; p = 0.029). The selection of apixaban is related to whether the patient is able to maintain a regular lifestyle, including adherence to medication schedules (OR = 1.874; p = 0.031). Furthermore, detailing activities from a medical representative, especially regarding a new indication, were found to influence drug selection for rivaroxaban (OR = 2.422; p = 0.047). CONCLUSION: This study revealed that edoxaban is the most frequently selected anticoagulant. Although prescribing cardiologists select drugs based on background factors, adherence to medication and information from medical representatives were also crucial factors in the selection process.

Time-in-therapeutic-range defined warfarin and direct oral anticoagulants in atrial fibrillation: a Nationwide Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Little is known how individual time-in-therapeutic-range (TTR) impacts the effectiveness and safety of warfarin therapy compared to direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness and safety of standard dose DOACs to warfarin in patients with AF, while categorizing warfarin treated patients into quartiles based on their individual TTR. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a nationwide study including all patients with new-onset AF between 2011 and 2018 in Finland. Hazard ratios (HR) were calculated using Cox regression analysis with the inverse probability of treatment weighted method to assess the risks of ischaemic stroke (IS), intracranial haemorrhage (ICH) and mortality for users of apixaban (n = 12,426), dabigatran (n = 4545), rivaroxaban (n = 12,950) and warfarin (n = 43,548). RESULTS: The median TTR for warfarin users was 72%. Compared to the second best TTR quartile (reference), the risk of IS was higher in the two poorest TTR quartiles, and lower in the best TTR quartile and on rivaroxaban [2.35 (95% confidence interval, 1.85-2.85), 1.44 (1.18-1.75), 0.60 (0.47-0.77) and 0.72 (0.56-0.92)]. These differences were non-significant for apixaban and dabigatran. HR of ICH was 6.38 (4.88-8.35) and 1.87 (1.41-2.49) in the two poorest TTR groups, 1.44 (1.02-1.93) on rivaroxaban, and 0.58 (0.40-0.85) in the best TTR group compared to the reference group. Mortality was higher in the two poorest TTR groups and lowest in the best TTR group. CONCLUSIONS: The outcome was unsatisfactory in the two lowest TTR quartiles - in half of the patients treated with warfarin. The differences between the high TTR groups and standard dose DOACs were absent or modest.

Risk factors for thrombosis and spontaneous echocardiographic contrast with sludge in atrial fibrillation patients treated with oral anticoagulants before electrical cardioversion.

BACKGROUND: Knowledge of thrombosis (T) risk predictors and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) are important tools in appropriate qualification of patients for safe electrical cardioversion. AIMS: We aimed to investigate predictors of T and spontaneous echocardiographic contrast (SEC) with sludge in the left atrium (LA) and appendage (LAA) in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients on oral anticoagulation. METHODS: The study included 300 patients with AF lasting >48 hours. Two hundred and nineteen patients were treated with oral anticoagulants (OACs) (study group, rivaroxaban: 104 [47.5%], apixaban: 52 [23.7%], dabigatran: 23 [11.5%], VKAs: 40 [18.3%]). Eighty-one consecutive patients with AF lasting >48 hours and not treated with OACs constituted the control group. Before electrical cardioversion, all patients underwent transthoracic echocardiography and TEE. RESULTS: TEE revealed T in the LAA in 4.7% of cases. The number of patients with T or SEC4+ with sludge in the OAC and control groups was similar, 5.9% vs. 1.2% and 16.4% vs. 16.0%, respectively. The risk of SEC4+/T in patients treated with OACs was lowest in those taking rivaroxaban (odds ratio [OR], 0.42; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.21-0.87; P = 0.027) and highest in those receiving VKAs (OR, 2.49; 95% CI, 1.15-5.39; P = 0.018). Multivariable analysis showed independent prognostic factors for SEC 4+/T: female sex (OR, 3.800; 95% CI, 1.592-9.072; P = 0.003), left ventricular ejection fraction (OR, 0.932; 95% CI, 0.890-0.957; P <0.001), and minimum LAA flow velocity (LAAfly min) (OR, 0.895; 95% CI, 0.841-0.954; P <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Female sex, transthoracic echocardiography, and TEE results should be taken into account in assessing the risk of T/SEC with sludge in LA/LAA patients with AF.

Equivalent thrombotic risk with Warfarin, Dabigatran, or Enoxaparin after failure of initial direct oral anticoagulation (DOAC) therapy.

BACKGROUND: The direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are now commonly regarded as first line anticoagulants in most cases of venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, the optimal choice of subsequent anticoagulant in instances of first line DOAC failure is unclear. OBJECTIVES: To describe and compare outcomes with second line anticoagulants used after DOAC failure. METHODS: Patients seen at an urban hospital system for an episode of acute VTE initially treated with either apixaban or rivaroxaban who experienced a subsequent recurrent thrombosis while on anticoagulation (1st recurrent thrombosis) were included. RESULTS: In total, 166 patients after apixaban or rivaroxaban failure were included. Following DOAC failure (1st recurrent thrombosis), the subsequent anticoagulant was warfarin in 60 patients (36%), dabigatran in 42 patients (25%), and enoxaparin in 64 patients (39%). Enoxaparin was preferentially prescribed in patients with a malignancy-associated etiology for 1st recurrent thrombosis (p < 0.01). The median follow-up time in our cohort was 16 months. There was no difference in 2nd recurrent thrombosis-free survival (p = 0.72) or risk for major bleeding event (p = 0.30) among patients treated with dabigatran, warfarin, or enoxaparin. CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective analysis of patients failing first line DOAC therapy, rates of 2nd recurrent thrombosis and bleeding did not differ among subsequently chosen anticoagulants. Our study provides evidence that the optimal 2nd anticoagulant is not clear, and the choice of 2nd anticoagulant should continue to balance patient preference, cost, and provider experience.

Efficacy and safety of dabigatran and rivaroxaban in atrial fibrillation patients with impaired liver function: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with impaired liver function (ILF) have not been sufficiently studied. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of DOACs for stroke prevention in patients with AF and ILF. METHOD: This study was based on data from 15 centers in China, including 4,982 AF patients. The patients were divided into 2 subgroups based on their liver function status: patients with normal liver function (NLF)(n = 4213) and patients with ILF (n = 769). Logistic regression analysis was used to investigate the risk of total bleeding, major bleeding, thromboembolism, and all-cause deaths in AF patients with NLF and ILF after taking dabigatran or rivaroxaban, respectively. RESULTS: Among AF patients treated with dabigatran or rivaroxaban, patients with ILF were associated with significantly higher major bleeding, compared with NLF patients (aOR: 4.797; 95% CI: 2.224-10.256; P < 0.001). In patients with NLF, dabigatran (n = 2011) had considerably lower risk of total bleeding than rivaroxaban (n = 2202) (aOR: 1.23; 95% CI: 1.002-1.513; P = 0.049). In patients with ILF, dabigatran (n = 321) significantly favored lower risks of major bleeding compared with rivaroxaban(n = 448) (aOR: 5.484; 95% CI: 1.508-35.269; P = 0.026). CONCLUSION: After using dabigatran or rivaroxaban, patients with ILF had remarkably increased risk of major bleeding compared with patients with NLF. In AF patients with NLF, dabigatran had the distinct strength of significantly reduced risk of total bleeding compared with rivaroxaban. In patients with AF and ILF, dabigatran use was associated with lower risk for major bleeding compared with rivaroxaban.

Effect of different oral anticoagulants on cognitive function in patients with atrial fibrillation: A Bayesian network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is 1 of the most common types of arrhythmias. At present, the treatment for patients with AF mainly includes oral anticoagulants (OACs). Studies have shown that OACs are associated with cognitive decline in patients with atrial fibrillation; however, there is a lack of relevant evidence. This study used Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) to investigate the effects of different oral anticoagulants on cognitive decline in patients with AF. METHODS: We systematically searched for clinical studies on oral anticoagulants in patients with AF in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library as of July 3, 2023. Cochrane's randomized controlled trial bias risk assessment tool and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale were used to assess the bias risk of the included studies. The main outcome measure was decreased cognitive functioning. RESULTS: Ten studies were included, including 2 RCTs and 7 RCSs, including 882,847 patients with AF. Five oral anticoagulants and 2 anticoagulants were included: VKAs (especially warfarin), Dabigatran, Edoxaban, Rivaroxaban, Apixaban, and Aspirin, Clopidogrel. The results of the mesh meta-analysis showed that VKAs were superior to warfarin in reducing the risk of cognitive decline in patients with AF (OR = -1.19, 95% CI (-2.35, -0.06), P < .05) (Table 5). The top 3 drugs in terms of the probability of reducing the incidence of cognitive impairment in patients with AF with different oral anticoagulants were VKAs (87%), rivaroxaban (62.2%), and dabigatran (60.8%). CONCLUSION: Based on the results of this study, VKAs may be the best intervention measure for reducing the risk of cognitive decline in patients with AF. Owing to the limitations of this study, more high-quality randomized controlled trials with large sample sizes and multiple centers are required to provide more evidence.

Appropriateness of prescribing profiles and intake adherence to non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation: analysis of a retrospective longitudinal study using real-world data from Northern Portugal (AF-React Study).

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess the appropriateness of prescribing profiles and intake adherence to non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). DESIGN: Retrospective longitudinal study. SETTING: The study was conducted in the Regional Health Administration of Northern Portugal. PARTICIPANTS: The authors selected a database of 21 854 patients with prescriptions for NOACs between January 2016 and December 2018 and were classified with AF until December 2018. OUTCOME MEASURES: The appropriate dosage of NOAC for patients with AF divided into three categories: contraindicated, inconsistent and consistent, based on the 2020 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for AF. RESULTS: Dabigatran had a lower percentage of guideline-consistent doses (n=1657, 50.1%) than other drugs such as rivaroxaban (n=4737, 81.6%), apixaban (n=3830, 78.7%) and edoxaban (n=436, 82.1%). Most patients with an inconsistent dose were prescribed a lower dose than recommended based on their glomerular filtration rate (GFR). Among patients younger than 75 years with GFR >60 mL/min, 59.8% (n=10 028) had an adequate GFR range, while 27.8% (n=7166) of GFR measurements from patients older than 75 years old and 29.4% (n=913) of GFR measurements from patients younger than 75 years with GFR <60 mL/min were within an adequate time range. Adherence to NOACs varied across different drugs, with 59.1% (n=540) adhering to edoxaban, 56.3% (n=5443) to rivaroxaban, 55.3% (n=3143) to dabigatran and 53.3% (n=4211) to apixaban. CONCLUSIONS: Dabigatran had the lowest percentage of guideline-consistent doses. Patients younger than 75 years with GFR >60 mL/min had the highest percentage with an adequate GFR range, while other groups who require closer GFR monitoring had lower percentages within an adequate GFR range. Adherence to NOACs differed among different drugs, with greater adherence to treatment with edoxaban and less adherence to apixaban.

In Vitro Simulation of the Fasted Gastric Conditions and Their Variability to Elucidate Contrasting Properties of the Marketed Dabigatran Etexilate Pellet-Filled Capsules and Loose Pellets.

Variability of the gastrointestinal tract is rarely reflected in in vitro test protocols but often turns out to be crucial for the oral dosage form performance. In this study, we present a generation method of dissolution profiles accounting for the variability of fasted gastric conditions. The workflow featured 20 biopredictive tests within the physiological variability. The experimental array was constructed with the use of the design of experiments, based on three parameters: gastric pH and timings of the intragastric stress event and gastric emptying. Then, the resulting dissolution profiles served as a training data set for the dissolution process modeling with the machine learning algorithms. This allowed us to generate individual dissolution profiles under a customizable gastric pH and motility patterns. For the first time ever, we used the method to successfully elucidate dissolution properties of two dosage forms: pellet-filled capsules and bare pellets of the marketed dabigatran etexilate product Pradaxa. We showed that the dissolution of capsules was triggered by mechanical stresses and thus was characterized by higher variability and a longer dissolution onset than observed for pellets. Hence, we proved the applicability of the method for the in vitro and in silico characterization of immediate-release dosage forms and, potentially, for the improvement of in vitro-in vivo extrapolation.

The Effect of ABCB1 and CES1 Polymorphisms on Plasma Levels of Dabigatran and Risk of Hemorrhagic Complications in Ischemic Stroke Patients.

BACKGROUND: Dabigatran directly inhibits thrombin and is used in primary and secondary stroke prevention in individuals with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. The prodrug dabigatran etexilate is absorbed by enteral P-glycoprotein (ABCB1) and then activated by hepatic and intestinal carboxylesterases (CES1) to produce active metabolites. Variations in dabigatran metabolism because of genetics may affect concentration levels and clinical outcomes. STUDY QUESTION: We conducted a study to assess how polymorphisms in the CES1 (rs2244613) and ABCB1 (rs4148738) genes affect the through plasma level (c min ) of dabigatran and its correlation to clinical outcomes. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective multicentric study of consecutive patients on dabigatran therapy. Examination of CES1 rs2244613 and ABCB1 rs4148738 polymorphisms, c min 12 hours after administration, clinical follow-up (ischemic stroke, major or clinically relevant hemorrhage, myocardial infarction, other thromboembolism, and death). MEASURES AND OUTCOMES: A total of 432 patients received treatment for an average of 19.78 months (SD of 20.165). The sex distribution of the patients was 56.5% male, and the average age was 67.56 years (SD of 14.7). The ABCB1 variant genotype was present in 67.8% of patients, whereas 37.5% carried the CES1 polymorphism. RESULTS: Compared with wild-type patients, patients with the CES1 variant had significantly lower dabigatran plasma levels (with a mean difference of 16.986; 95% confidence interval, 5.794-28.178 ng/mL, P = 0.003). We also found a significant risk of major bleeding in patients carrying the ABCB1 rs4148738 allele (hazard ratio = 1.99, confidence interval 95% 1.10 to 3.59, P = 0.024). CONCLUSIONS: The CES1 variant genotype rs2244613 is closely linked with reduced c min of dabigatran. Carriers of the ABCB1 rs4148738 polymorphism exhibit a tendency toward higher plasma levels of dabigatran, which leads to a significantly increased risk of bleeding.

Treatment of acute pulmonary embolism after catheter-directed thrombolysis with dabigatran vs warfarin: Results of a multicenter randomized RE-SPIRE trial.

BACKGROUND: Thrombolytic therapy is effective method in the high-risk acute pulmonary embolism (PE) treatment. Reduced-dose thrombolysis (RDT) plus oral anticoagulation therapy is effective and safe method in the moderate and severe PE treatment. It is leading to good early and intermediate-term outcomes. In the RE-COVER and RE-COVER II studies, dabigatran showed similar effectiveness as warfarin in the treatment of acute PE. Dabigatran leads to fewer hemorrhagic complications and is not inferior in efficacy to warfarin in the prevention of PE after mechanical fragmentation and RDT (catheter-directed treatment [CDT]+RDT) in patients with high and intermediate to high PE risk. We sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety (incidence of clinically significant recurrence of venous thromboembolic complications and deaths) during a 6-month course of treatment with dabigatran or warfarin in patients with high and intermediate to high acute PE risk after endovascular mechanical thrombus fragmentation procedure with RDT (CDT+RDT). METHODS: The RE-SPIRE is a prospective, multicenter randomized double-arm study. Over a 5-year period, 66 consecutive patients with symptomatic high and intermediate to high PE risk after endovascular mechanical thrombus fragmentation procedure with RDT (CDT+RDT) were randomized into two groups within the next 48 hours. The first group continued treatment with dabigatran 150 mg twice a day for 6 months; the second group continued treatment with warfarin under the control of international normalized ratio (2.0-3.0) for 6 months. Both groups received low molecular weight heparins for 2 days after surgery. Then, group 1 continued to receive low molecular-weight-heparin for 5 to 7 days, followed by a switch to dabigatran at a dosage of 150 mg two times a day. Group 2 received both low-molecular-weight heparin and warfarin up to an international normalized ratio of >2.0, followed by heparin withdrawal. The follow-up period was 6 months. RESULTS: There were 63 patients who completed the study (32 in the dabigatran group and 31 in the warfarin group). In both groups, there was a statistically significant decrease in the mean pulmonary artery pressure. The mean pulmonary artery pressure at the 6-month follow-up after surgery was 24 mm Hg (interquartile range, 20.3-29.25 mm Hg) in the dabigatran group and 23 mm Hg (interquartile range, 20.0-26.3 mm Hg) in the warfarin group. The groups did not differ statistically in the deep vein thrombosis dynamics. Partial recanalization occurred in 52.0% vs 73.1% in the dabigatran and warfarin groups, respectively (P = .15). Complete recanalization occurred in 28.0% vs 19.2% in the dabigatran and warfarin groups, respectively (P = .56). The groups did not differ in the frequency of major bleeding events according to the International Society for Thrombosis and Hemostasis (0% vs 3.2% in the dabigatran and warfarin groups, respectively; P = 1.00). However, there were more nonmajor bleeding events in the warfarin group than in the dabigatran group (16.1% vs 0%, respectively; P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: The results of the study show that dabigatran is comparable in effectiveness to warfarin. Dabigatran has greater safety in comparison with warfarin in the occurrence of all cases of bleeding in the postoperative and long-term periods. Thus, dabigatran may be recommended for the treatment and prevention of PE after CDT with RDT in patients with high and intermediate to high PE risk.

Comparative Safety and Effectiveness of Reduced Doses of Direct Acting Oral Anticoagulants for Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: This Nordic observational cohort study aims to assess the effectiveness and safety of reduced-dose direct-acting oral anticoagulants (DOACs) dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban compared to standard warfarin for stroke prevention in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. METHODS: The study, utilizing nationwide administrative databases from Denmark, Sweden, Norway, and Finland, spanned from January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2018 (2017 for Sweden). The cohort included 26,883 patients initiating reduced-dose DOACs and 108,014 comparable warfarin patients. Effectiveness was measured by the composite endpoint of ischemic stroke and systemic embolism, while safety was assessed through intracranial hemorrhage. RESULTS: The meta-analysis across countries revealed similar or lower incidences of ischemic stroke and systemic embolism in patients on reduced-dose DOACs compared to standard warfarin (rivaroxaban: HR 0.93, dabigatran: HR 0.88, apixaban: HR 0.79). Incidences within warfarin groups ranged from 2.16 to 3.71 per 100 person-years, comparable to DOAC recipients. Intracranial hemorrhage rates were generally low, ranging from 0.16 to 1.85 per 100 person-years. In comparison with warfarin patients, meta-analyses yielded HRs for rivaroxaban (1.41), dabigatran (0.35), and apixaban (0.72). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, atrial fibrillation patients initiating reduced-dose rivaroxaban and dabigatran exhibited incidences of ischemic stroke and systemic embolism similar to warfarin, and for apixaban, even lower. Rates of intracranial hemorrhage were comparable to or lower for patients on DOACs compared to warfarin.

Retrospective study of clinical settings, indications and consequences of measurement of direct oral anticoagulant plasma levels in Northern Tasmania, Australia.

BACKGROUND: Routine monitoring of direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) levels is not recommended but may be useful in certain clinical situations. There is a knowledge gap regarding the clinical use of DOAC levels in Australian hospitals. AIMS: To evaluate the clinical settings, indications and changes to anticoagulant management associated with DOAC levels in a tertiary hospital in Northern Tasmania, Australia. METHODS: Patients with one or more DOAC levels (dabigatran, rivaroxaban or apixaban) requested between January 2017 and December 2022 were identified. Retrospective chart review was performed to evaluate the clinical settings, indications, adequacy of request information and changes to clinical management associated with the measurement of DOAC levels. RESULTS: One hundred and twenty-nine DOAC measurements (54 rivaroxaban, 66 apixaban and nine dabigatran) were performed in 98 patients between January 2017 and December 2022. Annual requests for DOAC levels increased significantly between 2017 and 2019 and remained stable between 2020 and 2021 but declined in 2022. Overall, the most common indication for a DOAC level was renal impairment, followed by bleeding and recurrent thrombosis. Approximately 25% of requests were for acute bleeding with a reversal/haemostatic agent given in 45% of patients, while 10% were prior to urgent surgery. Measurement of DOAC levels was associated with a change in management in 50% of cases. 10% of requests did not specify anticoagulant history. CONCLUSION: Trends in requests for DOAC levels have changed over time. Clinician education regarding the importance of providing specific anticoagulant history is essential. Future prospective studies investigating the clinical utility of DOAC levels in different clinical settings are needed.

Patrones y resultados del cambio de anticoagulantes orales directos en la fibrilación auricular no valvular: experiencia en la práctica clínica en España / Patterns and outcomes of switching direct oral anticoagulants in non-valvular atrial fibrillation: A real-world experience from Spain

Objetivos El objetivo consistía en evaluar un programa de gestión de anticoagulantes orales directos (ACOD) en pacientes con fibrilación auricular no valvular (FANV) según sus perfiles, idoneidad de la dosis, patrones de cambio de tratamiento, efectividad y seguridad Se trató de un estudio observacional, prospectivo y longitudinal en una cohorte de pacientes atendidos en la práctica clínica cotidiana en un hospital regional español con un plan de seguimiento de 3 años para pacientes que iniciaron el tratamiento con dabigatrán, rivaroxabán o apixabán entre enero de 2012 y diciembre de 2016. Métodos Se analizaron 490 episodios de tratamiento (apixabán 2,5mg, 9,4%; apixabán 5mg, 21,4%; dabigatrán 75mg, 0,6%; dabigatrán 110mg, 12,4%; dabigatrán 150mg, 19,8%; rivaroxabán 15mg, 17,8%; rivaroxabán 20mg, 18,6%) en 445 pacientes. En el 13,6% de los pacientes tratados con dabigatrán, el 9,7% de los tratados con rivaroxabán y el 3,9% de los tratados con apixabán se cambió a otros ACOD o se modificó la dosis. Resultados El ACOD al que se cambió con mayor frecuencia fue el apixabán. Los motivos más frecuentes para cambiar de tratamiento fueron toxicidad (23,8%), hemorragia (21,4%) y deterioro renal (16,7%). En el 23,8% de los episodios se constató una inadecuación de la dosis. Las tasas de ictus y accidentes isquémicos transitorios (AIT) fueron de 1,64 y 0,54 eventos/100 años/paciente, respectivamente, mientras que las de hemorragias importantes, no importantes, pero clínicamente relevantes (NICR) e intracraneales fueron de 2,4, 5 y 0,5 eventos/100 años/paciente, respectivamente. Las hemorragias digestivas y genitourinarias fueron el tipo más frecuente de eventos hemorrágicos. En el análisis multifactorial, el ictus previo y la edad fueron factores predictivos independientes de ictus/AIT. El uso concomitante de antiagregantes plaquetarios, el sexo masculino y la edad fueron factores predictivos independientes de eventos hemorrágicos (AU)

Aims The aim is to evaluate a management program for direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients according to their profiles, appropriateness of dosing, patterns of crossover, effectiveness and safety. This is an observational and longitudinal prospective study in a cohort of patients attended in daily clinical practice in a regional hospital in Spain with 3-year a follow-up plan for patients initiating dabigatran, rivaroxaban or apixaban between Jan/2012 and Dec/2016. Methods We analyzed 490 episodes of treatment (apixaban 2.5, 9.4%; apixaban 5, 21.4%; dabigatran 75, 0.6%; dabigatran 110, 12.4%; dabigatran 150, 19.8%; rivaroxaban 15, 17.8% and rivaroxaban 20, 18.6%) in 445 patients. 13.6% of patients on dabigatran, 9.7% on rivaroxaban, and 3.9% on apixaban switched to other DOACs or changed dosing. Results Apixaban was the most frequent DOAC switched to. The most frequent reasons for switching were toxicity (23.8%), bleeding (21.4%) and renal deterioration (16.7%). Inappropriateness of dose was found in 23.8% of episodes. Rates of stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA) were 1.64/0.54 events/100 patients-years, while rates of major, clinically relevant non-major (CRNM) bleeding and intracranial bleeding were 2.4, 5, and 0.5 events/100 patients-years. Gastrointestinal and genitourinary bleeding were the most common type of bleeding events (BE). On multivariable analysis, prior stroke and age were independent predictors of stroke/TIA. Concurrent platelet inhibitors, male gender and age were independent predictors of BE. Conclusion This study complements the scant data available on the use of DOACs in NVAF patients in Spain, confirming a good safety and effectiveness profil (AU)

Dabigatran Dosing Proposal for Adults With Atrial Fibrillation: Stress-Testing Renal Function Range in Real World Patients.

Dabigatran is the first of four direct-acting oral anticoagulants approved to prevent stroke in adult patients with atrial fibrillation using a fixed two-dose scheme compared with warfarin dosing adjusted to a prothrombin time range associated with optimal risk reduction in stroke and serious bleeding. The pivotal phase III trial found dabigatran, depending on dose, is superior to warfarin in stroke reduction and similar in bleeding risk while also showing dabigatran efficacy and safety correlate with steady-state plasma concentrations. Because the relationship between dabigatran dose and plasma concentration is highly variable, a previously developed population pharmacokinetic model of over 9,000 clinical trial patients was used as a basis for simulations comparing the performance of dosing via the drug label to other proposed doses and regimens. Assessment of dosing regimen performance was based on simulations of trough plasma levels within the therapeutic concentration range of 75-150 ng/mL over a renal function range of 15-250 mL/min creatinine clearance, representing extremes for real-world patients. An improved regimen that best achieves this therapeutic range was identified, requiring five different dosing schedules, corresponding to specified renal function ranges, compared with the two approved in the label. The discussion focuses on how this information could better inform patient outcomes and future dabigatran development.

Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Warfarin in the Treatment of Cerebral Venous Thrombosis (ACTION-CVT): A Multicenter International Study.

BACKGROUND: A small randomized controlled trial suggested that dabigatran may be as effective as warfarin in the treatment of cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT). We aimed to compare direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) to warfarin in a real-world CVT cohort. METHODS: This multicenter international retrospective study (United States, Europe, New Zealand) included consecutive patients with CVT treated with oral anticoagulation from January 2015 to December 2020. We abstracted demographics and CVT risk factors, hypercoagulable labs, baseline imaging data, and clinical and radiological outcomes from medical records. We used adjusted inverse probability of treatment weighted Cox-regression models to compare recurrent cerebral or systemic venous thrombosis, death, and major hemorrhage in patients treated with warfarin versus DOACs. We performed adjusted inverse probability of treatment weighted logistic regression to compare recanalization rates on follow-up imaging across the 2 treatments groups. RESULTS: Among 1025 CVT patients across 27 centers, 845 patients met our inclusion criteria. Mean age was 44.8 years, 64.7% were women; 33.0% received DOAC only, 51.8% received warfarin only, and 15.1% received both treatments at different times. During a median follow-up of 345 (interquartile range, 140-720) days, there were 5.68 recurrent venous thrombosis, 3.77 major hemorrhages, and 1.84 deaths per 100 patient-years. Among 525 patients who met recanalization analysis inclusion criteria, 36.6% had complete, 48.2% had partial, and 15.2% had no recanalization. When compared with warfarin, DOAC treatment was associated with similar risk of recurrent venous thrombosis (aHR, 0.94 [95% CI, 0.51-1.73]; P=0.84), death (aHR, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.22-2.76]; P=0.70), and rate of partial/complete recanalization (aOR, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.48-1.73]; P=0.79), but a lower risk of major hemorrhage (aHR, 0.35 [95% CI, 0.15-0.82]; P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with CVT, treatment with DOACs was associated with similar clinical and radiographic outcomes and favorable safety profile when compared with warfarin treatment. Our findings need confirmation by large prospective or randomized studies.

Propensity score methods for comparative-effectiveness analysis: A case study of direct oral anticoagulants in the atrial fibrillation population.

OBJECTIVE: To explore methodological challenges when using real-world evidence (RWE) to estimate comparative-effectiveness in the context of Health Technology Assessment of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in Scotland. METHODS: We used linkage data from the Prescribing Information System (PIS), Scottish Morbidity Records (SMR) and mortality records for newly anticoagulated patients to explore methodological challenges in the use of Propensity score (PS) matching, Inverse Probability Weighting (IPW) and covariate adjustment with PS. Model performance was assessed by standardised difference. Clinical outcomes (stroke and major bleeding) and mortality were compared for all DOACs (including apixaban, dabigatran and rivaroxaban) versus warfarin. Patients were followed for 2 years from first oral anticoagulant prescription to first clinical event or death. Censoring was applied for treatment switching or discontinuation. RESULTS: Overall, a good balance of patients' covariates was obtained with every PS model tested. IPW was found to be the best performing method in assessing covariate balance when applied to subgroups with relatively large sample sizes (combined-DOACs versus warfarin). With the IPTW-IPCW approach, the treatment effect tends to be larger, but still in line with the treatment effect estimated using other PS methods. Covariate adjustment with PS in the outcome model performed well when applied to subgroups with smaller sample sizes (dabigatran versus warfarin), as this method does not require further reduction of sample size, and trimming or truncation of extreme weights. CONCLUSION: The choice of adequate PS methods may vary according to the characteristics of the data. If assumptions of unobserved confounding hold, multiple approaches should be identified and tested. PS based methods can be implemented using routinely collected linked data, thus supporting Health Technology decision-making.

Simultaneous subacute interstitial nephritis and anticoagulant-related nephropathy related to novel oral anticoagulants use.

Introduction: Interstitial nephritis related to novel oral anticoagulants was only reported in sporadic case reports and none was accompanied by anticoagulants related nephropathy (ARN).Case Report: We presented here a case of biopsy-proven subacute interstitial nephritis (SubAIN) accompanied by ARN after oral dabigatran to alarm clinicians. This case manifested with gross hematuria, acute kidney injury, slightly prolonged thrombin time, moderate anemia, moderate proteinuria, a large quantity of intratubular hemoglobin casts confirmed by hemoglobin antibody immunohistochemical staining which presumed to occur around 1 week after dabigatran and subacute interstitial nephritis accompanied by focal proliferative glomerulonephritis. Serum creatinine level did not continue to elevate after discontinuation of the oral anticoagulant. With the subsequent supportive therapy, it decreased to some extent then reduced to normal with the help of prednisone (half of the full dose).Conclusions: When we came across a patient who manifested as hematuria or acute kidney injury with a history of anticoagulants usage, we should think of ARN and pay more attention on history collection. Secondly, subacute interstitial nephritis may coexist with ARN. Thirdly, hemoglobin immunohistochemical staining may be helpful to make it clear whether the intra-tubular protein casts came from red blood cells. In addition, for those patients who may have decreased kidney function, anticoagulants dose should be reduced to prevent the occurrence of ARN.

Impact of different renal function equations on direct oral anticoagulant concentrations.

The purpose of this study is to investigate the correlation between glomerular filtration rate (GFR) estimated by different renal function equations and non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulant concentration. Atrial fibrillation patients who aged ≥ 20 years and used dabigatran, rivaroxaban, or apixaban for thromboembolism prevention were enrolled to collect blood samples and measure drug concentrations using ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry. The GFR was estimated using the Cockroft-Gault formula (abbreviated as creatinine clearance, CrCL), Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration formula (CKD-EPI) featuring both creatinine and cystatin C, and the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study equation (MDRD). Multivariate regression was used to investigate the associations of different renal function estimates with drug concentrations. A total of 511 participants were enrolled, including 146 dabigatran users, 164 rivaroxaban users and 201 apixaban users. Compared to clinical trials, 35.4% of dabigatran, 4.9% of rivaroxaban, and 5.5% of apixaban concentrations were higher than the expected range (p < 0.001). CKD-EPI and MDRD estimates classified fewer patients as having GFR < 50 mL/min than CrCL in all 3 groups. Both CrCL and CKD-EPI were associated with higher-than-expected ranges of dabigatran or rivaroxaban concentrations. Nevertheless, none of the renal function equations was associated with higher-than-expected apixaban concentrations. For participants aged ≥ 75 years, CKD-EPI may be associated with higher-than-expected trough concentration of dabigatran. In conclusion, CrCL and CKD-EPI both can be used to identify patients with high trough concentrations of dabigatran or rivaroxaban. Among elderly patients who used dabigatran, CKD-EPI may be associated with increased drug concentration.