Posible influencia de factores no controlados en las concentraciones séricas de uracilo / Possible influence of uncontrolled factors on serum uracil concentrations

Antecedentes y objetivos: el déficit de dihidropirimidina deshidrogenasa (DPD) se ha asociado con un mayor riesgo de toxicidad tras exposición a fluoropirimidinas (FP). La determinación de las concentraciones plasmáticas de uracilo endógeno (U) es la prueba recomendada para identificar el déficit de DPD. Sin embargo, el valor de U puede verse afectado por diversos factores. El objetivo fue determinar la concentración sérica de U en una población candidata a recibir tratamiento con FP y comprobar si su distribución era compatible con la prevalencia del déficit parcial de DPD estimada en población caucásica. Material y métodos: estudio observacional prospectivo en el que se incluyeron pacientes oncológicos candidatos a tratamiento con FP. Para la determinación analítica se empleó un sistema Dionex Ultimate 3000 UHPLC, acoplado a un espectrómetro de masas cuadrupolo-orbitrap híbrido Q-exactive. Resultados: se incluyeron 77 pacientes con una edad media de 71 años. La media y la mediana de las concentraciones séricas de U fue 30,4 y 24,0 ng/ml, respectivamente. El rango fue de 7,1 a 139,7 ng/ml. Un 79,2% de los pacientes presentó un nivel de U comprendido entre 16 y 150 ng/ml, mostrando una diferencia estadísticamente significativa al compararlo con la prevalencia estimada en población caucásica (8%) (p-valor <0,0001). El método analítico empleado tiene un coeficiente de correlación R2 > 0,99 y un límite de detección <0,2 ng/ml. Conclusiones: es necesario llevar a cabo más estudios con un diseño dirigido a establecer las condiciones óptimas relativas al pretratamiento de las muestras a fin de evitar o minimizar la influencia de estos factores sobre los valores del analito. (AU)

Background and objective: dihydropyridine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency has been associated with an increased risk of toxicity after exposure to fluoropyrimidines (FP). Determination of endogenous uracil (U) plasma concentrations is the recommended test to identify DPD deficiency. However, the value of U can be affected by various factors. The objective was to determine the serum concentration of U in a population candidate to receive treatment with FP and to verify if its distribution was compatible with the prevalence of partial DPD deficiency estimated in the Caucasian population. Material and methods: prospective observational study in which cancer patients candidates for FP treatment were included. For the analytical determination, a Dionex Ultimate 3000 UHPLC system coupled to a Q-exactive hybrid quadrupole-orbitrap mass spectrometer was used. Results: 77 patients, with a mean age of 71 years, were included. The mean and median serum U concentrations were 30.4 and 24.0 ng/ml, respectively. The range was from 7.1 to 139.7 ng/ml. 79.2% of the patients presented a U level between 16 and 150ng/ml, showing a statistically significant difference when compared to the estimated prevalence in the Caucasian population (8%) (p-value <0.0001). The analytical method used has a correlation coefficient R2 > 0.99 and a detection limit <0.2 ng/ml. Conclusions: it is necessary to carry out more studies with a design aimed at establishing the optimal conditions related to the pretreatment of the samples in order to avoid or minimize the influence of these factors on the analyte values. (AU)

A comprehensive population-based study comparing the phenotype and genotype in a pretherapeutic screen of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency.

BACKGROUND: Pretherapeutic screening for dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency is recommended or required prior to the administration of fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy. However, the best strategy to identify DPD-deficient patients remains elusive. METHODS: Among a nationwide cohort of 5886 phenotyped patients with cancer who were screened for DPD deficiency over a 3 years period, we assessed the characteristics of both DPD phenotypes and DPYD genotypes in a subgroup of 3680 patients who had completed the two tests. The extent to which defective allelic variants of DPYD predict DPD activity as estimated by the plasma concentrations of uracil [U] and its product dihydrouracil [UH2] was evaluated. RESULTS: When [U] was used to monitor DPD activity, 6.8% of the patients were classified as having DPD deficiency ([U] > 16 ng/ml), while the [UH2]:[U] ratio identified 11.5% of the patients as having DPD deficiency (UH2]:[U] < 10). [U] classified two patients (0.05%) with complete DPD deficiency (> 150 ng/ml), and [UH2]:[U] < 1 identified three patients (0.08%) with a complete DPD deficiency. A defective DPYD variant was present in 4.5% of the patients, and two patients (0.05%) carrying 2 defective variants of DPYD were predicted to have low metabolism. The mutation status of DPYD displayed a very low positive predictive value in identifying individuals with DPD deficiency, although a higher predictive value was observed when [UH2]:[U] was used to measure DPD activity. Whole exon sequencing of the DPYD gene in 111 patients with DPD deficiency and a "wild-type" genotype (based on the four most common variants) identified seven heterozygous carriers of a defective allelic variant. CONCLUSIONS: Frequent genetic DPYD variants have low performances in predicting partial DPD deficiency when evaluated by [U] alone, and [UH2]:[U] might better reflect the impact of genetic variants on DPD activity. A clinical trial comparing toxicity rates after dose adjustment according to the results of genotyping or phenotyping testing to detect DPD deficiency will provide critical information on the best strategy to identify DPD deficiency.

[Review of methods for determination of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase and possible application in screening previous chemotheraphy with 5-fluorouracil]. / Przeglad metod oznaczania dehydrogenazy dihydropirymidynowej oraz mozliwosci ich zastosowania w badaniach przesiewowych poprzedzajacych chemoterapie 5-fluorouracylem.

5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and its prodrug capecitabine are one of the most commonly used chemotherapeutic drugs. DPD-deficient cancer patients may be at risk of severe and sometimes lethal toxicity after the administration of 5-FU. In 39-61% of the cases severe toxicity of 5-FU is caused by decreased DPD acivity. DPD is the initial and rate-limiting enzyme of the metabolism of pyrimidines. 80-90% of the administered 5-FU is catabolised by DPD. Mutation of the DPYD gene encoding DPD result in decreased enzyme activity--total (0.2% of population) or partial (3-5% of population). Determination of DPD activity can be used as a screening procedure to identify patients with a DPD deficiency, before the start of treatment with 5-FU. There are several methods for DPD activity determination: the detection of relevant DPYD gene single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNPs), measurement of the level of DPYDmRNA expression, the evaluation of DPD activity in PBMC, the measurement of uracil in plasma and urea, evaluation of the UH2/U (dihydrouracil/uracil) and THYH2/THY (dihydrothymine/tymine) ratio in plasma and urea, [2-C13]uracil breath test, the analysis of fluorouracil and dihydrofluorouracil in plasma after administered a test dose of fluorouracil and measurement of 2-fluoro-beta-alanine. So far more than 30 mutations of DPYD gene have been identified in patients with cancer. A large number of them limits introduction of simple genetic test, which could be used for detection of DPD deficiency. Therefore scientists in searching of the simplest, the cheapest and the most available technique for detection DPD deficiency, generally use methods associated with measurement of DPD activity.

Mutational spectrum of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase gene (DPYD) in the Tunisian population.

Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase enzyme (DPD) deficiency is a pharmacogenetic syndrome leading to severe side-effects in patients receiving therapies containing the anticancer drug 5-fluorouracil (5-FU). The aim of this population study is to evaluate gene variations in the coding region of the dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase gene (DPYD) in the Tunisian population. One hundred and six unrelated healthy Tunisian volunteers were genotyped by denaturing HPLC (DHPLC). Twelve variants in the coding region of the DPYD were detected. Allele frequencies of DPYD*5 (A1627G), DPYD*6 (G2194A), DPYD*9A (T85C), A496G, and G1218A were 12.7%, 7.1%, 13.7%, 5.7%, and 0.5%, respectively. The DPYD alleles DPYD*2A (IVS 14+1g>1), DPYD*3 (1897 del C) and DPYD*4 (G1601A) associated with DPD deficiency were absent from the examined subjects. We describe for the first time a new intronic polymorphism IVS 6-29 g>t, found in an allelic frequency of 4.7% in the Tunisian population. Comparing our data with that obtained in Caucasian, Egyptian, Japanese and African-American populations, we found that the Tunisian population resembles Egyptian and Caucasian populations with regard to their allelic frequencies of DPYD polymorphisms. This study describes for the first time the spectrum of DPYD sequence variations in the Tunisian population.