Impact of renal impairment on dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) phenotyping.

BACKGROUND: The chemotherapeutic agent 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is catabolized by dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD), the deficiency of which may lead to severe toxicity or death. Since 2019, DPD deficiency testing, based on uracilemia, is mandatory in France and recommended in Europe before initiating fluoropyrimidine-based regimens. However, it has been recently shown that renal impairment may impact uracil concentration and thus DPD phenotyping. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The impact of renal function on uracilemia and DPD phenotype was studied on 3039 samples obtained from three French centers. We also explored the influence of dialysis and measured glomerular filtration rate (mGFR) on both parameters. Finally, using patients as their own controls, we assessed as to what extent modifications in renal function impacted uracilemia and DPD phenotyping. RESULTS: We observed that uracilemia and DPD-deficient phenotypes increased concomitantly to the severity of renal impairment based on the estimated GFR, independently and more critically than hepatic function. This observation was confirmed with the mGFR. The risk of being classified 'DPD deficient' based on uracilemia was statistically higher in patients with renal impairment or dialyzed if uracilemia was measured before dialysis but not after. Indeed, the rate of DPD deficiency decreased from 86.4% before dialysis to 13.7% after. Moreover, for patients with transient renal impairment, the rate of DPD deficiency dropped dramatically from 83.3% to 16.7% when patients restored their renal function, especially in patients with an uracilemia close to 16 ng/ml. CONCLUSIONS: DPD deficiency testing using uracilemia could be misleading in patients with renal impairment. When possible, uracilemia should be reassessed in case of transient renal impairment. For patients under dialysis, testing of DPD deficiency should be carried out on samples taken after dialysis. Hence, 5-FU therapeutic drug monitoring would be particularly helpful to guide dose adjustments in patients with elevated uracil and renal impairment.

Implementation and clinical benefit of DPYD genotyping in a Danish cancer population.

BACKGROUND: In 2020, the European Medicines Agency recommended testing patients for dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency before systemic treatment with fluoropyrimidines (FP). DPD activity testing identifies patients at elevated risk of severe FP-related toxicity (FP-TOX). The two most used methods for DPD testing are DPYD genotyping and DPD phenotyping (plasma uracil concentration). The primary objective of this study was to compare the overall frequency of overall grade ≥3 FP-TOX before and after the implementation of DPYD genotyping. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred thirty Danish, primarily gastrointestinal cancer patients, were DPYD-genotyped before their first dose of FP, and blood was sampled for post hoc assessment of P-uracil. The initial dose was reduced for variant carriers. Grade ≥3 FP-TOX was registered after the first three treatment cycles of FP. The frequency of toxicity was compared to a historical cohort of 492 patients with post hoc determined DPYD genotype from a biobank. RESULTS: The frequency of overall grade ≥3 FP-TOX was 27% in the DPYD genotype-guided group compared to 24% in the historical cohort. In DPYD variant carriers, DPYD genotyping reduced the frequency of FP-related hospitalization from 19% to 0%. In the control group, 4.8% of DPYD variant carriers died due to FP-TOX compared to 0% in the group receiving DPYD genotype-guided dosing of FP. In the intervention group, wild-type patients with uracil ≥16 ng/ml had a higher frequency of FP-TOX than wild-type patients with uracil <16 ng/ml (55% versus 28%). CONCLUSIONS: We found no population-level benefit of DPYD genotyping when comparing the risk of grade ≥3 FP-TOX before and after clinical implementation. We observed no deaths or FP-related hospitalizations in patients whose FP treatment was guided by a variant DPYD genotype. The use of DPD phenotyping may add valuable information in DPYD wild-type patients.

Survey of US Medical Oncologists' Practices and Beliefs Regarding DPYD Testing Before Fluoropyrimidine Chemotherapy.

PURPOSE: Patients who carry reduced-activity DPYD polymorphisms have increased fluoropyrimidine (FP) toxicity risk. Although pretreatment DPYD testing is recommended throughout most of Europe, it is not recommended in the United States, and adoption has been limited. The objective of this survey was to describe the current practice in the United States regarding pretreatment DPYD testing and understand the factors deterring oncologists from ordering testing. METHODS: Survey invitations were e-mailed to 325 medical oncologists practicing in the United States who are members of the SWOG Cancer Research Network Gastrointestinal Cancer, Breast Cancer, or Early Therapeutics Committees. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate survey responses. RESULTS: Responses were collected from 59 (18.2%) US medical oncologists, of whom 98% strongly or somewhat agree that patients with dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency have increased toxicity risk and 96% would modify FP dosing for a patient with known DPD deficiency. However, only 32% strongly or somewhat agree that pretreatment DPYD testing is useful to inform FP treatment, 20% have ever ordered pretreatment testing, and 3% order testing for at least 10% of their FP-treated patients. The most important factors that deter oncologists from ordering testing were low prevalence of DPD deficiency (54%) and lack of clinical practice guideline recommendations (48%). CONCLUSION: Clinical adoption of pretreatment DPYD testing is extremely limited in the United States. Utilization may be substantially increased by inclusion in the oncology clinical practice guideline recommendations, coverage through health insurance, and potentially education of medical oncologists regarding available treatment modification guidelines.

Severe Gastrointestinal Disorder Due to Capecitabine Associated with Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase Deficiency: A Case Report and Literature Review.

Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency induces severe adverse events in patients receiving fluoropyrimidines. We encountered a 64-year-old DPD-deficient man with a severe capecitabine-related gastrointestinal disorder. He received capecitabine-containing chemotherapy after rectal cancer resection. During the first course of chemotherapy, he developed severe diarrhea, a fever, and hematochezia. Endoscopy revealed mucosal shedding with bleeding throughout the gastrointestinal tract. DPD deficiency was suspected because he developed many severe adverse events of capecitabine early and was finally confirmed based on the finding of a low DPD activity level in peripheral blood mononuclear cells. After one month of intensive care, hemostasis and mucosal healing were noted, although his gastrointestinal function did not improve, and he had persistent nutritional management issues.

New DPYD variants causing DPD deficiency in patients treated with fluoropyrimidine.

PURPOSE: Several clinical guidelines recommend genetic screening of DPYD, including coverage of the variants c.1905 + 1G>A(DPYD*2A), c.1679T>G(DPYD*13), c.2846A>T, and c.1129-5923C>G, before initiating treatment with fluoropyrimidines. However, this screening is often inadequate at predicting the occurrence of severe fluoropyrimidine-induced toxicity in patients. METHODS: Using a complementary approach combining whole DPYD exome sequencing and in silico and structural analysis, as well as phenotyping of DPD by measuring uracilemia (U), dihydrouracilemia (UH2), and the UH2/U ratio in plasma, we were able to characterize and interpret DPYD variants in 28 patients with severe fluoropyrimidine-induced toxicity after negative screening. RESULTS: Twenty-five out of 28 patients (90%) had at least 1 variant in the DPYD coding sequence, and 42% of the variants (6/14) were classified as potentially deleterious by at least 2 of the following algorithms: SIFT, Poly-Phen-2, and DPYD varifier. We identified two very rare deleterious mutations, namely, c.2087G>A (p.R696H) and c.2324T>G (p.L775W). We were able to demonstrate partial DPD deficiency, as measured by the UH2/U ratio in a patient carrying the variant p.L775W for the first time. CONCLUSION: Whole exon sequencing of DPYD in patients with suspicion of partial DPD deficiency can help to identify rare or new variants that lead to enzyme inactivation. Combining different techniques can yield abundant information without increasing workload and cost burden, thus making it a useful approach for implementation in patient care.

Lethal toxicities after capecitabine intake in a previously 5-FU-treated patient: why dose matters with dihydropryimidine dehydrogenase deficiency.

Dihydropryimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency is a pharmacogenetic syndrome associated with severe or lethal toxicities with oral capecitabine. Usually, patients with history of 5-FU-based therapy with no signs for life-threatening toxicities are considered as not DPD-deficient individuals who can be safely treated next with capecitabine if required. Here we describe the case of a woman originally treated with standard FEC100 protocol for metastatic breast cancer with little severe toxicities but grade-3 mucosities that were quickly resolved by symptomatic treatment. When switched to capecitabine + vinorelbine combo, extremely severe toxicities with fatal outcome were unexpectedly observed. Pharmacogenetic investigations were performed on cytidine deaminase and DPYD, and showed that this patient was heterozygous for the 2846A>T mutation on the DPYD gene. DPD phenotyping (i.e., uracil plasma levels >250 ng/ml, dihydrouracil/uracil ratio <0.5) confirmed that this patient was profoundly DPD deficient. Differences in fluoropyrimidine dosing between FEC100 (i.e., 500 mg/m2 5-FU) and capecitabine (i.e., 2250 mg daily) could explain why initial 5-FU-based protocol did not lead to life-threatening toxicities, whereas capecitabine rapidly triggered toxic death. Overall, this case report suggests that any toxicity, even when not life threatening, should be considered as a warning signal for possible underlying profound DPD deficiency syndrome, especially with low-dose protocols.

Prompt treatment with uridine triacetate improves survival and reduces toxicity due to fluorouracil and capecitabine overdose or dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency.

Uridine triacetate has been shown to be an effective antidote against mortality and toxicity caused by either overdoses or exaggerated susceptibility to the widely used anticancer agents 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and capecitabine. However, a direct assessment of efficacy based on when emergency treatment was initiated was not clinically feasible. In this study we used mouse models of 5-FU overdose and of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency to compare the efficacy of uridine triacetate in reducing toxicity and mortality when treatment was initiated at time points from 4 to 144 h after administration of 5-FU. We found that uridine triacetate was effective both in the 5-FU overdose and DPD deficiency models. Starting treatment within 24 h was most effective at reducing toxicity and mortality in both models, while treatment starting more than 96 to 120 h after 5-FU was far less effective. Uridine triacetate also reduced mortality in the DPD deficiency model when mice were treated with the 5-FU prodrug capecitabine. The results of this study are supportive of clinical observations and practice, indicating that efficacy declined progressively with later and later treatment initiation. Prompt treatment with uridine triacetate, within 24 h, conferred the greatest protection against 5-FU overexposure.

[Suspected dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency in a patient receiving capecitabine as adjuvant chemotherapy after colon resection].

We report here the case of a 75-year-old male patient who developed severe side effects after treatment with capecitabine (Xeloda®) that he received as adjuvant chemotherapy. He was suspected to have partial dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency. The patient underwent sigmoidectomy for sigmoid cancer and was treated with capecitabine as adjuvant chemotherapy. He was admitted to our hospital 14 days after the start of treatment with appetite loss, diarrhea, and a high body temperature. After admission, he developed severe neurotoxicity (Grade 4). We measured the DPD activity in peripheral mononuclear cells, which indicated partial DPD deficiency.

Toxicity Associated with Capecitabine in Patients Suffering from Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase Deficiency.

Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) is a metabolic enzyme that is crucial in 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) degradation. A deficiency in it is associated with the occurrence of adverse events following fluoropyrimidine-based therapies. We describe a case of toxicity grade 5 after the administration of capecitabine and oxaliplatin in a patient with stage III colorectal cancer and DPD congenital deficiency, which was identified later. Several polymorphisms have been associated with the global toxicity of 5-FU; however, genetic tests are low in sensitivity and therefore they cannot as yet be used as prescreening techniques in clinical practice.

[Dihydropirymidine dehydrogenase (DPD)--a toxicity marker for 5-fluorouracil?]. / Dehydrogenaza dihydopirymidynowa (DPD)--marker toksycznosci 5-fluorouracylu?

In proceedings relating to patients suffering from cancer, an important step is predicting response and toxicity to treatment. Depending on the type of cancer, physicians use the generally accepted schema of treatment, for example pharmacotherapy. 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is the most widely used anticancer drug in chemotherapy for colon, breast, and head and neck cancer. Patients with dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency, which is responsible for the metabolism of 5-FU, may experience severe side effects during treatment, and even death. In many publications the need for determining the activity of DPD is discussed, which would protect the patient from the numerous side effects of treatment. However, in practice these assays are not done routinely, despite the high demand. In most cases, a genetic test is used to detect changes in the gene encoding DPD (such as in the USA), but because of the large number of mutations the genetic test cannot be used as a screening test. Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase activity has been shown to have high variability among the general population, with an estimated proportion of at least 3-5% of individuals showing low or deficient DPD activity. In this publication we presents data about average dihydropirymidine dehydrogenase activity in various populations of the world (e.g. Japan, Ghana, Great Britain) including gender differences and collected information about the possibility of determination of DPD activity in different countries. Detection of reduced DPD activity in patients with planned chemotherapy will allow a lower dosage of 5-FU or alternative treatment without exposing them to adverse reactions.