Nikolaus Rüdinger (1832-1896), His Description of Joint Innervation in 1857, and the History of Surgical Joint Denervation.

BACKGROUND: Selective joint denervation has become a reliable palliative treatment, especially for painful joints in the upper and lower extremity. METHODS: This article highlights the life and work of Nikolaus Rüdinger (1832-1896) who first described joint innervation which became the basis of later techniques of surgical joint denervation. The historical evolution of this method is outlined. RESULTS: Rüdinger made a unique career from apprentice barber to military surgeon and anatomy professor in Munich, Germany. His first description of articular innervation of temporomandibular, shoulder, elbow, wrist, finger, sacroiliac, hip, knee, ankle, foot, and toe joints in 1857 stimulated the subsequent history of surgical joint denervation. Comparing his investigations with modern joint denervation methods, developed by pioneers like Albrecht Wilhelm or A. Lee Dellon, shows his great exactitude and anatomical correspondence despite different current terminology. Clinical series of modern surgical joint denervations reveal success rates of up to 80% with reliable long-term results. CONCLUSION: The history of joint denervation with Rüdinger as its important protagonist offers inspiring insights into the evolution of surgical techniques and exemplifies the value of descriptive functional anatomy, even if surgical application may not have been realized until a century later.

The Denervated Muscle: 45 years later.

Forty-five years after its publication, Ernest Gutmann's book, The Denervated Muscle, still stands as a landmark publication. It summarized the state of knowledge of the time and introduced many new researches that were continuing at the Institute of Physiology in Prague. At the time, the response of a muscle to denervation was viewed primarily through the lens of the neurotrophic theory. Advancements in our understanding of neurotrophic effects and mechanisms would now call into question some of the hypotheses and interpretations presented in the book, but many of the research findings have stood the test of time. This review will cover some of the questions asked and data presented in this book, and will place them into the context of contemporary muscle biology.