Severe phytophotodermatitis from fig sap: a little known phenomenon.

A 46-year-old arborist with no medical history presented to the emergency department with a confluent blistering, erythematous, non-pruritic, painful rash covering both arms circumferentially and the back of his neck. He sought medical advice as his arms were becoming more painful and swollen with blister formation, despite aloe vera cream and wet towel wraps. He recalled that 2 days previously he had been pruning a fig tree on a hot sunny day. He was wearing a t-shirt and his forearms had been exposed to a large quantity of fig sap, while he was working under direct sunlight. On examination, there were several blisters with no superimposed infection. He was diagnosed with phytophotodermatitis and referred to a regional burns unit. He recovered well with simple dressings and a course of antibiotics. At present, he has made a good recovery with no long-term sequelae such as skin hyperpigmentation or hypopigmentation.

Feeling the Burn: Phototoxicity and Photoallergy.

An interaction between light's radiation and certain exogenous and endogenous substances can lead to the development of photoallergic and/or phototoxic dermatoses. Clinically, reactions may range from acute and self-limited to chronic and recurrent. Delays in diagnosis are not uncommon due to complex clinical presentations, broad differentials, and limited number of specialists who perform phototesting. Therefore, a critical understanding of these dermatoses is essential for accurate diagnosis and appropriate management. The epidemiology, light sources, mechanisms, clinical presentations, evaluation protocols, common culprits, treatments, key challenges, and future directions related to photoallergy and phototoxicity are reviewed herein.

[Phototoxic reaction due to solar radiation exposure in a psoriatic patient treated with PUVA therapy]. / Reakcja fototoksyczna po ekspozycji na promieniowanie sloneczne u pacjentki leczonej metoda PUVA z powodu luszczycy.

A phototoxic reaction may be induced by additional exposure to solar radiation during photochemotherapy (psoralen, ultra-violet A - PUVA treatment). A woman was admitted to Dermatology and Venereology Clinic in Lódz as an emergency case due to extensive erythematous-vesicular lesions on the skin of the lower limbs, accompanied by pain, itching and burning of the skin. The interview found that the patient was undergoing PUVA phototherapy for psoriatic lesions, with hypertension and nicotine dependence. Physical examination revealed large blisters, filled with serum and congestive erythematous lesions located on the lateral surfaces of the thighs and backs of the feet, as well as marked swelling of the lower limbs. Also, discs coated with thin scales were found on the upper and lower limbs and on the trunk. The entire body was intensely tanned. The patient was diagnosed with acute phototoxic reaction and general corticosteroids, antihistamine drugs, an antibiotic, antihypertensive drugs and topical treatment were introduced. Immunological tests were performed during the first days of hospitalization following the emergence of new blisters. Negative results ruled out bullous pemphigoid and pemphigus. Gradual clinical improvement was observed. To avoid the occurrence of acute phototoxicity during phototherapy, patients require education about the need to avoid UV exposure and to use photoprotection, when receiving UV-sensitizing treatment. Med Pr. 2019;70(6):763-8.

Wilderness Dermatology: Bugs, Plants, and Other Nuisances That May Ruin Your Hike.

Spending time outdoors can be rewarding. However, exposure to the sun, insect bites, and plant exposures may result in a wide range of dermatologic manifestations. In this article, we describe potential cutaneous manifestations of common wilderness exposures in New England including photodermatoses from prolonged sun exposure, phytodermatoses from plant exposures, and arthropod-bite reactions from common insects (mosquitos, spiders, ticks, hymenoptera, mites and chiggers). The article will also address preventive and treatment strategies which may help physicians and their patients better prepare for spending time in the wilderness. [Full article available at http://rimed.org/rimedicaljournal-2019-02.asp].

Laser-Assisted Photodynamic Therapy: Two Novel Protocols for Enhanced Treatment Results.

Photodynamic therapy (PDT) uses a topical photosensitizing agent which is activated by a light source to cause destruction of specific cells. Commonly used for the treatment of actinic keratoses and photodamage, PDT can also be used for other conditions including acne and sebaceous hyperplasia. Here we report our experience with two treatment protocols. The first protocol utilizes laser assisted delivery of topical 5-aminolevulinic acid for enhanced efficacy of blue light photodynamic therapy in the treatment of actinic keratoses and photodamage. The second protocol utilizes red light photodynamic therapy followed by pulsed dye laser to effectively target sebaceous glands in patients with extensive sebaceous hyperplasia.

J Drugs Dermatol. 2017;16(4):329-331.

Lemons in the Arizona Sunshine: The Effects of Furocoumarins Leading to Phytophotodermatitis and Burn-like Injuries.

INTRODUCTION: Phytophototoxic dermatitis is a strong phototoxic reaction to ultraviolet A (UV-A) radiation exposure after cutaneous contact with citrus fruit containing furocoumarins, leading to skin injury. At the Arizona Burn Center (Phoenix, AZ), the majority of these injuries are managed in the outpatient setting. CASE REPORT: The authors present a pediatric admission for burn-like injuries following prolonged cutaneous exposure to lemons while playing in the Arizona sunshine. A 7-year-old girl playing in her backyard squeezed lemon juice onto her skin while in the hot Arizona sunshine; within 24 hours, the child experienced pain, erythema, and blistering to multiple areas of her skin. She was admitted to the authors' burn center for wound care and pain control. She had scattered first-degree and second-degree burn-like lesions to her face, neck, and chest as well as bilateral forearms, hands, lower extremities, and feet. After blister debridement, appropriate dressing care, and pain medication, the patient was discharged home after 4 days of hospitalization with appropriate clinical follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Burn-like lesions caused by furocoumarins after cutaneous absorption and UV-A exposure are known clinical entities in Arizona. The sequential progression from erythema to blisters equivalent to second-degree burn-like lesions to cutaneous hyperpigmentation is a well-described clinical triad. Meticulous wound care and pain control for the treatment of these burn-like lesions are essential as is the need for the wound care specialist to be well versed on this topic to quickly identify the etiology of the injury, thereby avoiding misdiagnosing the patient with nonaccidental traumatic injuries.

Acropigmentación dorsal por elaboración de mojitos: una fitofotodermatosis por lima / Acropigmentation of the Dorsum of the Hands From Preparing Mojitos: A Lime-Induced Phytophotodermatosis

No disponible

An unusual rash for Royal: a case series.

Eight patients, whilst on exercise in Albania, presented with a blistering, erythematous and itchy rash, consistent with caustic burns, after living in dense vegetation for a few days. All patients were found to have been living and operating under fig trees and had come into contact with the sap of Ficus carica, which on exposure to ultraviolet A (UVA) radiation, can cause a process of phytophotodermatitis leading to a blistering rash.

Photosensitive disorders of the skin with ocular involvement.

Patients with photosensitive disorders of the skin may present with ocular manifestations that are evident at birth or may be manifested later with progression of the disorder. Dermatologists should be able to recognize these and appropriately refer patients for further management. Ocular involvement associated with immunologically mediated photodermatoses, drug- and chemical-induced photosensitivity, photodermatoses associated with defective DNA repair/chromosome instability, and photoaggravated dermatoses are reviewed. Photodermatoses are commonly classified into four general groups: (1) immunologically mediated photodermatoses; (2) drug- and chemical-induced photosensitivity; (3) photodermatoses associated with defective DNA repair/chromosome instability; and (4) photoaggravated dermatoses. Photodermatoses in these groups with ocular involvement will be discussed. In addition, skin diseases associated with photophobia are also described.

Fitofotodermatitis por Ruta graveolens / Photosensitivity by Ruta graveolens

Introducción: las lesiones por fototoxicidad son poco frecuentes en edad pediátrica y son un motivo excepcional de consulta en Atención Primaria. Caso clínico: una paciente de 12 años nacida en España de madre nicaragüense acude a la consulta de Pediatría por aparición de lesiones marronáceas asintomáticas. Llamaba la atención la distribución lineal a lo largo de los miembros inferiores. Se solicitó una interconsulta a Dermatología, donde fue diagnosticada de reacción fototóxica. Posteriormente, la paciente refirió haberse derramado sobre las piernas una solución alcohólica con extracto de ruda. Conclusión: las lesiones cutáneas lineales adquiridas suelen tener una causa exógena. Es importante indagar las circunstancias que preceden la aparición de las lesiones para hacer un diagnóstico correcto (AU)

Introduction: Phytophotodermatitis is exceptional in pediatric population. Case: we report a case of a 12 year old female patient admitted in our clinic due to asymptomatic brown macular lesions. The lineal pattern trough the inferior limbs was remarkable and, after dermatological review, a phototoxic reaction was first considered. Afterwards the patient declared she had used a rue alcoholic solution. Conclusion: lineal acquired dermatological lesions commonly have an exogenous origin. It’s important to know the circumstances that underwent before they appear to make a right diagnosis (AU)

Phototoxic plant burns: report of a case and review of topical wound treatment in children.

Acute photodermatitis provoked by skin contact with giant hogweed (Heracleum mantegazzianum) and exposure to ultraviolet radiation is a rare cause of phytophotodermatitis in children. We report the case of a 10-year-old girl with extensive photodermatitis after contact with giant hogweed and prolonged exposure to sunlight. The lesions involved 10% of the body surface area, mainly the lower extremities. After initial application of topical steroids to the skin erythema, the topical approach was changed due to extensive bullae. Debridement and temporary wound closure with an adequate dressing was undertaken. This is the first case report of application of Suprathel (PolyMedics Innovations, Denkendorf, Germany) on a phytophototoxic burn-like wound with a favorable outcome.

Phototoxicity in an ultraviolet ink manufacturing plant.

Ultraviolet (UV) dyes are used as inks in garment printing. Hypersensitivity reactions to these compounds have been reported in the literature. The authors report a case of reaction to UV ink in a patient already on corticosteroid therapy. The patient's clinical course was reviewed along with images of wounds that subsequently developed. The affected areas were debrided and covered with Vaseline gauze and silver impregnated dressings. Epithelium was salvaged in many areas, and regrowth occurred over several weeks in regions of deeper injury. The concurrent use of steroids and the rapidity of the onset of symptoms were not characteristic of hypersensitivity dermatitis, which has previously been reported. The cause of the wounds was likely phototoxicity from radical subtypes in the ink that catalyze the reaction when exposed to UV light.

Patient-recorded outcome to assess therapeutic efficacy in protoporphyria-induced dermal phototoxicity: a proposal.

BACKGROUND: Protoporphyria (PP) resulting from two rare, inherited diseases of heme biosynthesis leads to dermal phototoxicity by accumulation of the heme precursor protoporphyrin IX. No standardized tools to quantify the degree of PP-related phototoxicity and its change by medical intervention have been published. METHODS: Results from a questionnaire completed by 17 affected individuals were used to determine the relative importance of two main components of PP-related phototoxicity, skin pain and sunlight exposure time, with respect to the effectiveness of any particular medical treatment. RESULTS: Inter-rater reliability was 0.71 (n = 490), repeated estimates by four identical individuals showed high reproducibility (Slope = 1, intercept = 0, n = 136, Passing-Bablock).Six different models were developed, three of them showed good correlation with effectiveness estimates. Data from an unpublished trial indicated that the model with highest potential of responsiveness was the so called "Exposure times [multiplied by] Freedom from Pain" (ETFP). The minimal clinically important difference (MID) was 15 (10.2-20.4) ETFP scores, representing 28% of the standard deviation of the clinical trial data and 2.9% of its total range. CONCLUSIONS: Among the six models proposed to assess the effectiveness of therapeutic interventions in PP the ETFP model demonstrates the highest sensitivity using the existing data from a clinical trial of afamelanotide in PP. The results of this study have provided sufficient validation of the ETFP model that is likely to prove useful in future clinical trials.

Photodermatoses: classification, evaluation and management.

Photodermatoses are skin disorders induced or exacerbated by light. They can be broadly classified into four groups: (i) immunologically mediated photodermatoses (idioapathic); (ii) drug- and chemical-induced photosensitivity; (iii) defective DNA repair disorders; and (iv) photoaggravated dermatoses. The exact pathomechanism of those diverse skin reactions to light radiation remains unclear. Immunologically mediated photodermatoses are the most common dermatoses among all photosesnsitive disorders. The management of photodermatoses starts with clinical recognition of characteristic lesions localized predominantly in light exposed skin. Detailed history-taking, phototesting and photopatch testing are required to establish a correct diagnosis, especially if patients present in disease-free intervals. Classification and short description of distinctive clinical features of most common photodermatoses, several practical aspects of evaluation and management of the patient with photosensitivity will be outlined.

Heracleum mantegazzianum and Toxicodendron succedaneum: plants of human health significance in New Zealand and the National Pest Plant Accord.

New Zealand's National Pest Plant Accord (NPPA) is a voluntary and cooperative agreement between industry, regional councils, and central government departments with biosecurity responsibilities (primarily the Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry and the Department of Conservation). Plant species included in the NPPA are declared unwanted organisms under the Biosecurity Act 1993, which prevents their sale, propagation, or distribution across the country. Although MAF Biosecurity New Zealand (the lead agency in New Zealand's biosecurity system) has evaluated the potential human health impacts of 202 species considered for inclusion in the NPPA, two species were examined primarily due to their significance to human health: Heracleum mantegazzianum (giant hogweed, cow parsnip, wild parsnip) and Toxicodendron succedaneum (rhus tree, wax tree, Japanese wax tree). As a result of this process, H. mantegazzianum has been listed in the NPPA. In contrast, T. succedaneum was not included in the NPPA, as the latter was deemed to be an inappropriate mechanism for its control. In this article the NPPA process is outlined, and the adverse impacts on human health of these two species are discussed--including symptoms, treatment, and possible management measures.

[Phototoxic reaction after the systemic administration of antimicrobial drugs]. / Fototoxické reakce po systémovém podaivaini antimikrobiálních léku.

Several systemically administered drugs with antimicrobial effect have undesirable phototoxic effects. This group includes some antibiotics (e.g., tetracycline, fluorochinolons, and also macrolids), sulphonamides and related chemotherapeutics, antimycotics, tuberculostatics, antiviral drugs and antimetabolites. Doctors should know the phototoxic effect of those drugs in advance, because of the possible time shortage they might have when they prescribe the drugs. The first condition is to obtain the relevant personal history data, and in case the phototoxic reaction develops, to terminate the unsuitable drug, to change it for another, to administer antihistaminics, sometimes corticoids, prevent exposition to sun, and administer local anti-inflammatory dermatological drugs.