Perioral dermatitis: Diagnosis, proposed etiologies, and management.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Perioral dermatitis is a common cutaneous condition characterized by acneiform facial eruptions often with an eczematous appearance. A granulomatous subtype exists in addition to the classic variant. While topical corticosteroids have been largely implicated in this condition, its etiology is not completely understood. METHODS: Using the keywords "corticosteroids," "dermatology," "fusobacteria," "perioral dermatitis," and "periorificial dermatitis," we searched the databases PubMed, MEDLINE, and EMBASE to find the relevant literature. Only articles in English were chosen. The level of evidence was evaluated and selected according to the highest level working our way downwards using the Oxford Centre of Evidence-Based Medicine 2011 guidance. RESULTS: This systematic review found the strongest evidence to support topical corticosteroid misuse as the principal causative factor in the pathogenesis of perioral dermatitis. CONCLUSION: In terms of treatment, further research is required to robustly investigate promising treatment options including tetracyclines, topical metronidazole, topical azelaic acid, adapalene gel, and oral isotretinoin.

Treatment of pediatric periorificial dermatitis with topical calcineurin inhibitor and topical/oral metronidazole.

Pediatric periorificial dermatitis is a papulopustular eruption found around the facial orifices in children. Although the treatment of the disease has been largely anecdotal and experience-based, studies have shown that topical calcineurin inhibitors, as well as other topical and oral antibiotics, such as metronidazole, can be effective treatment options. However, most of the studies with a sizable number of patients have been based on the Caucasian population. Herein, we evaluated the clinical efficacy of topical calcineurin inhibitors and topical/oral metronidazole in 24 Korean patients with pediatric periorificial dermatitis. The majority of the patients showed a complete response to treatment.

A Practical Approach to Recalcitrant Face and Neck Dermatitis in Atopic Dermatitis.

Face and neck dermatitis in the atopic dermatitis patient is a diagnostically challenging entity with broad differential diagnoses. Recent case reports reporting face and neck dermatitis in patients on dupilumab therapy have added further complexity to diagnosis and management. Herein, we discuss a broad diagnostic algorithm and practical management strategy for recalcitrant face and neck dermatitis in the atopic patient with an emphasis on face and neck dermatitis associated with dupilumab therapy. Our aim is to raise awareness about the probable entity of drug-associated face and neck dermatitis and share a practical management strategy that may also be applied broadly to atopic dermatitis patients presenting with face and neck dermatitis.

Efficacy of a skin care cream with TRPV1 inhibitor 4-t-butylcyclohexanol in the topical therapy of perioral dermatitis.

BACKGROUND: Perioral dermatitis is a clinically distinctive reaction pattern of facial dermatitis, including redness, dryness, burning, pruritus and skin tightness. A gold standard treatment remains unclear. OBJECTIVES: Our study evaluates the clinical value of a skin care cream with the transient receptor potential vanilloid type 1 inhibitor 4-t-butylcyclohexanol in POD patients over 8 weeks. METHODS: This open, unblinded 8-week clinical trial included 48 patients. A skin care cream containing 4-t-butylcyclohexanol was applied over a period of 8 weeks. Standardized questionnaires were used at baseline, 4 and 8 weeks, for history documentation, objective and subjective severity scores, and quality of life assessments. Six different skin physiology parameters were assessed at all timepoints. RESULTS: The perioral dermatitis severity score decreased significantly during the treatment period. This was mirrored by significantly lower patients' subjective numerical rating score and an improved quality of life score. Transepidermal water loss, stratum corneum hydration and skin erythema improved significantly during the treatment period. CONCLUSION: This transient receptor potential vanilloid type 1 inhibitor-based skin care cream improved subjective and objective parameters of perioral dermatitis. Decreased transepidermal water loss values and increased stratum corneum hydration demonstrate a restored skin barrier function. Consequently, the topical inhibition of these receptors is a promising management option for POD.

Two differing presentations of periocular dermatitis as a side effect of dupilumab for atopic dermatitis.

Dupilumab is a monoclonal antibody used to treat atopic dermatitis. Worsening of atopic dermatitis and conjunctivitis following dupilumab use are reported adverse effects; however, there is little reported on the nature and mechanism of these complications. Here, we describe two patients with chronic atopic dermatitis who developed new or severely worsened periocular dermatitis, believed to be a side effect of dupilumab injections, and resolution after its discontinuation. We explore the possibility of dupilumab-induced suppression of Th2 mediated inflammation and upregulation of Th1 and IFNγ mediated inflammation as a possible mechanism.

Clinical findings and outcomes for dogs with uveodermatologic syndrome.

OBJECTIVE To evaluate signalment, clinical signs, treatment, and factors affecting visual prognosis in dogs with uveodermatologic syndrome (UDS). DESIGN Retrospective case series and nested cohort study. ANIMALS 50 dogs (37 Akitas and 13 non-Akitas) with UDS evaluated at 4 ophthalmology practices. PROCEDURES Data were collected from the medical records regarding signalment, clinical signs, biopsy results, medications, adverse effects, vision and glaucoma status at initial and subsequent examinations, and duration of follow-up. Various factors were examined for associations with development of blindness or glaucoma following initial examination. RESULTS The most common ophthalmic signs included aqueous flare (n = 35 [70%]), iris abnormalities (29 [58%]), retinal detachment (23 [46%]), and choroidal depigmentation or chorioretinal infiltrates (10 [20%]). At initial examination, 36% (18/50) of dogs had glaucoma and 57% (26/46) were blind in both eyes. Twenty-five (50%) dogs had vision at their final visit, representing 78% of the 32 dogs that had vision at initial examination or regained vision during the follow-up period. In dogs that lost vision, median time to permanent blindness in both eyes was 13.5 months (range, 0.4 to 59 months) after initial examination. No significant associations with time to glaucoma or vision loss were identified for signalment variables, specific medications, or duration of clinical signs prior to initial examination. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE UDS commonly resulted in glaucoma, vision loss, or both in affected dogs. No evaluated factor was associated with visual prognosis; however, a subset of patients maintained vision through to the final recheck examination.

[Granulomatous periocular eruption]. / Dermatite périoculaire granulomateuse.

BACKGROUND: Herein, we report a case of atypical periorificial dermatitis in a patient that had been receiving treatment for some time for atopic dermatitis. The specific feature of this rash was its periocular predominance with no perioral involvement, its clinical aspect and its histological picture evocative of sarcoidosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A 33-year-old man was being treated for a atopic dermatitis limited to the face and poorly responsive to dermal corticosteroids. Treatment was initiated with topical tacrolimus 0.1%. After 4 years, dependence on this treatment was noted, with daily application being needed to control the lesions. One year later, symmetric lesions were seen on the eyelids and periorbital regions; these were erythematous, micropapular and poorly delineated in a setting of oedema. Biopsy revealed epithelioid granulomatous inflammation, and, to a lesser degree, sarcoidal giant-cell features without caseous necrosis. Staging tests to identify systemic sarcoidosis were negative. Treatment with hydroxychloroquine at 400mg per day and discontinuation of topical tacrolimus resulted in complete remission of the lesions within 2 months. Hydroxychloroquine was discontinued after 6 months, and no relapses had occurred after 2 years of follow-up. DISCUSSION: Three diagnostic hypotheses may be posited for these granulomatous facial lesions. We opted for a diagnosis of granulomatous periorificial dermatitis despite the fact that exclusively periorbital involvement is rare (this condition is generally associated with perioral dermatitis). The second was that of pure cutaneous sarcoidosis, but the topography and clinical appearance of the lesions did not correspond to any of the cutaneous forms classically described. The third was that of tacrolimus-induced granulomatous rosacea, but the histological picture is different. CONCLUSION: The present case underscores the fact that a histological appearance of sarcoidosis on skin biopsy may be associated with perioral dermatitis.

Pediatric periorificial dermatitis.

Periorificial dermatitis (POD) has been documented in the pediatric population in patients as young as 3 months, with a slight predominance in girls compared to boys. Many patients have a personal or family history of atopic disorders. Periorificial dermatitis typically presents with erythematous to flesh-colored papules and rarely pustules near the eyes, nose, and mouth. Although the etiology is unknown, many patients have had recent exposure to a topical or less commonly an inhaled or systemic corticosteroid. Although steroids may initially control the skin lesions, disease often rebounds after discontinuing therapy. Diagnosis of POD is clinical. Laboratory tests are not helpful in making the diagnosis, and the histology of POD resembles rosacea. It is important to rule out other acneform diagnoses based on the age of the patient, clinical history, and presentation of the lesions. Topical metronidazole has been successful in the pediatric population. For pediatric patients with extrafacial skin lesions or more severe disease, oral antibiotics such as tetracycline, doxycycline, minocycline, azithromycin, and erythromycin can be used, depending on the age of the patient.