Pharmacological and non-pharmacological strategies for obese women with subfertility.

BACKGROUND: Clinicians primarily recommend weight loss for obese women seeking pregnancy. The effectiveness of interventions aimed at weight loss in obese women with subfertility is unclear. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness and safety of pharmacological and non-pharmacological strategies compared with each other, placebo, or no treatment for achieving weight loss in obese women with subfertility. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the CGF Specialised Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, and AMED from inception to 18 August 2020. We also checked reference lists and contacted experts in the field for additional relevant papers. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included published and unpublished randomised controlled trials in which weight loss was the main goal of the intervention. Our primary effectiveness outcomes were live birth or ongoing pregnancy and primary safety outcomes were miscarriage and adverse events. Secondary outcomes included clinical pregnancy, weight change, quality of life, and mental health outcome. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Review authors followed standard Cochrane methodology. MAIN RESULTS: This review includes 10 trials. Evidence was of very low to low quality: the main limitations were due to lack of studies and poor reporting of study methods. The main reasons for downgrading evidence were lack of details by which to judge risk of bias (randomisation and allocation concealment), lack of blinding, and imprecision. Non-pharmacological intervention versus no intervention or placebo Evidence is insufficient to determine whether a diet or lifestyle intervention compared to no intervention affects live birth (odds ratio (OR) 0.85, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.65 to 1.11; 918 women, 3 studies; I² = 78%; low-quality evidence). This suggests that if the chance of live birth following no intervention is assumed to be 43%, the chance following diet or lifestyle changes would be 33% to 46%. We are uncertain if lifestyle change compared with no intervention affects miscarriage rate (OR 1.54, 95% CI 0.99 to 2.39; 917 women, 3 studies; I² = 0%; very low-quality evidence). Evidence is insufficient to determine whether lifestyle change compared with no intervention affects clinical pregnancy (OR 1.06, 95% CI 0.81 to 1.40; 917 women, 3 studies; I² = 73%; low-quality evidence). Lifestyle intervention resulted in a decrease in body mass index (BMI), but data were not pooled due to heterogeneity in effect (mean difference (MD) -3.70, 95% CI -4.10 to -3.30; 305 women, 1 study; low-quality evidence; and MD -1.80, 95% CI -2.67 to -0.93; 43 women, 1 study; very low-quality evidence). Non-pharmacological versus non-pharmacological intervention We are uncertain whether intensive weight loss interventions compared to standard care nutrition counselling affects live birth (OR 11.00, 95% CI 0.43 to 284; 11 women, 1 study; very low-quality evidence), clinical pregnancy (OR 11.00, 95% CI 0.43 to 284; 11 women, 1 study; very low-quality evidence), BMI (MD -3.00, 95% CI -5.37 to -0.63; 11 women, 1 study; very low-quality evidence), weight change (MD -9.00, 95% CI -15.50 to -2.50; 11 women, 1 study; very low-quality evidence), quality of life (MD 0.06, 95% CI -0.03 to 0.15; 11 women, 1 study; very low-quality evidence), or mental health (MD -7.00, 95% CI -13.92 to -0.08; 11 women, 1 study; very low-quality evidence). No study reported on adverse events . Pharmacological versus pharmacological intervention For metformin plus liraglutide compared to metformin we are uncertain of an effect on the adverse events nausea (OR 7.22, 95% CI 0.72 to 72.7; 28 women, 1 study; very low-quality evidence), diarrhoea (OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.01 to 8.3; 28 women, 1 study; very low-quality evidence), and headache (OR 5.80, 95% CI 0.25 to 133; 28 women, 1 study; very low-quality evidence). We are uncertain if a combination of metformin plus liraglutide vs metformin affects BMI (MD 2.1, 95% CI -0.42 to 2.62; 28 women, 1 study; very low-quality evidence) and total body fat (MD -0.50, 95% CI -4.65 to 3.65; 28 women, 1 study; very low-quality evidence). For metformin, clomiphene, and L-carnitine versus metformin, clomiphene, and placebo, we are uncertain of an effect on miscarriage (OR 3.58, 95% CI 0.73 to 17.55; 274 women, 1 study; very low-quality evidence), clinical pregnancy (OR 5.56, 95% CI 2.57 to 12.02; 274 women, 1 study; very low-quality evidence) or BMI (MD -0.3, 95% CI 1.17 to 0.57, 274 women, 1 study, very low-quality evidence). We are uncertain if dexfenfluramine versus placebo affects weight loss in kilograms (MD -0.10, 95% CI -2.77 to 2.57; 21 women, 1 study; very low-quality evidence). No study reported on live birth, quality of life, or mental health outcomes. Pharmacological intervention versus no intervention or placebo We are uncertain if metformin compared with placebo affects live birth (OR 1.57, 95% CI 0.44 to 5.57; 65 women, 1 study; very low-quality evidence). This suggests that if the chance of live birth following placebo is assumed to be 15%, the chance following metformin would be 7% to 50%. We are uncertain if metformin compared with placebo affects gastrointestinal adverse events (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.32 to 2.57; 65 women, 1 study; very low-quality evidence) or miscarriage (OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.04 to 5.80; 65 women, 1 study; very low-quality evidence) or clinical pregnancy (OR 2.67, 95% CI 0.90 to 7.93; 96 women, 2 studies; I² = 48%; very low-quality evidence). We are also uncertain if diet combined with metformin versus diet and placebo affects BMI (MD -0.30, 95% CI -2.16 to 1.56; 143 women, 1 study; very low-quality evidence) or waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) (MD 2.00, 95% CI -2.21 to 6.21; 143 women, 1 study; very low-quality evidence). Pharmacological versus non-pharmacological intervention No study undertook this comparison. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Evidence is insufficient to support the use of pharmacological and non-pharmacological strategies for obese women with subfertility. No data are available for the comparison of pharmacological versus non-pharmacological strategies. We are uncertain whether pharmacological or non-pharmacological strategies effect live birth, ongoing pregnancy, adverse events, clinical pregnancy, quality of life, or mental heath outcomes. However, for obese women with subfertility, a lifestyle intervention may reduce BMI. Future studies should compare a combination of pharmacological and lifestyle interventions for obese women with subfertility.

[The pharmacological treatment of obesity: past, present and future]. / Az elhízás gyógyszeres kezelése: múlt, jelen, jövo

Currently, obesity presents one of the biggest health problems. Management strategies for weight reduction in obese individuals include changes in life style such as exercise and diet, behavioral therapy, and pharmacological treatment, and in certain cases surgical intervention. Diet and exercise are best for both prevention and treatment, but both require much discipline and are difficult to maintain. Drug treatment of obesity offer a possible adjunct, but it may only have modest results, limited by side effects; furthermore, the weight lowering effects last only as long as the drug is being taken and, unfortunately, as soon as the administration is stopped, the weight is regained. These strategies should be used in a combination for higher efficacy. Drugs used to induce weight loss have various effects: they increase satiety, reduce the absorption of nutrients or make metabolism faster; but their effect is usually moderate. In the past, several drugs were used in the pharmacological therapy of weight reduction including thyroid hormone, dinitrophenol, amphetamines and their analogues, e.g. fenfluramine, At present, only orlistat is available in the long term treatment (≥ 24 weeks) of obesity as sibutramine and rimonabant were withdrawn form the market. Several new anti-obesity drugs are being tested at present, and liraglutide, a GLP-1 analogue (incretin mimetic), is the most promising one.

Deconstructing antiobesity compound action: requirement of serotonin 5-HT2B receptors for dexfenfluramine anorectic effects.

The now-banned anorectic molecule, dexfenfluramine, promotes serotonin release through a serotonin transporter-dependent mechanism, and it has been widely prescribed for the treatment of obesity. Previous studies have identified that 5-HT(2B) receptors have important roles in dexfenfluramine side effects, that is, pulmonary hypertension, plasma serotonin level regulation, and valvulopathy. We thus investigated a putative contribution of 5-HT(2B) receptors in dexfenfluramine-dependent feeding behavior in mice. Interestingly, the hypophagic response to dexfenfluramine (3-10 mg/kg) observed in wild-type mice (1-4 h) was eliminated in mice lacking 5-HT(2B) receptors (5-HT(2B)(-/-)). These findings were further validated by the lack of hypophagic response to dexfenfluramine in wild-type mice treated with RS127445, a highly selective and potent antagonist (pKi=8.22 ± 0.24). Using microdialysis, we observed that in 5-HT(2B)(-/-) awake mice, the dexfenfluramine-induced hypothalamic peak of serotonin release (1 h) was strongly reduced (fourfold) compared with wild type. Moreover, using hypothalamic synaptosomes, we established the serotonergic neuron autonomous properties of this effect: a strong serotonin release was observed upon dexfenfluramine stimulation of synaptosome preparation from wild type but not from mice lacking active 5-HT(2B) receptors. These findings strongly suggest that activation of presynaptic 5-HT(2B) receptors is a limiting step in the serotonin transporter dependent-releasing effect of dexfenfluramine, whereas other serotonin receptors act downstream with respect to feeding behavior.

End of the line for cannabinoid receptor 1 as an anti-obesity target?

A wave of terminations of development programmes for cannabinoid receptor 1 blockers for obesity indicates the demise of a drug class that was once anticipated to yield blockbusters. Nevertheless, lessons learned might help salvage something for future such approaches.

Diferencias de género en la exploración funcional del sistema serotoninérgico en jóvenes sanos / Gender-related differences in functional assessment of serotonergic system in healthy young subjects

Introducción. Las pruebas de estimulación de prolactina con agonistas serotoninérgicos han sido ampliamente utilizadas en el estudio de diversas patologías psiquiátricas; sin embargo, la caracterización de su respuesta en sujetos normales es aún incompleta. Objetivo. Comparar la respuesta a la estimulación serotoninérgica utilizando dexfenfluramina, un agente serotoninérgico específico, en hombres y mujeres jóvenes sanos, controlando el ciclo menstrual en estas últimas. Métodos. Se estudió a 10 mujeres y 9 hombres, a quienes se les administró 30 mg de dexfenfluramina por vía oral, midiendo los niveles de prolactina cada hora por un período de5 h. El nivel basal, el nivel máximo y la variación de prolactina fueron comparados en ambos grupos. Resultados. En los grupos etarios estudiados (edad promedio para los hombres: 19,9±2,5 años; edad promedio paral as mujeres: 20±1,5 años), el nivel máximo de prolactina y la respuesta a prolactina (Δ PRL) fueron significativamente mayores en mujeres (valor p: 0,02 y 0,04, respectivamente). Conclusiones. Las mujeres jóvenes sanas muestran una mayor respuesta a la estimulación con dexfenfluramina que los hombres jóvenes sanos. Las implicancias clínicas y biológicas de esta observación se discuten en el contexto de la literatura (AU)

Introduction. Prolactin stimulation test with serotonergic stimulants has been widely used in the study of diverse psychiatric disorders. However, the characterization of this response in normal subjects is still in complete. Objective. To compare the response to serotonin stimulation using dexfenfluramine, a specific serotonergic agent, in young healthy men and women, controlling the menstrual cycle. Methods. A total of 10 women and 9 men, who were given 30 mg of dexfenfluramine orally, were studied and their levels of prolactin were measured on an hourly basis for a five-hour period. Baseline, maximum and delta values of prolactin were compared for both groups. Results. According to the age groups studied (mean age for men: 19.9±2.5 years old; mean age for women: 20±1.5 years old), the prolactin maximum level and the response to prolactin (ΔPRL) were significantly higher in women (p-values: 0.02 and 0.04, respectively). Conclusions. Young healthy women show a greater response to stimulation with dexfenfluramine than young healthy men. Clinical and biological implications of this observation are discussed in the context of the currently available research papers (AU)

Antagonism of glutamatergic NMDA and mGluR5 receptors decreases consumption of food in baboon model of binge-eating disorder.

Excessive consumption of highly palatable foods may contribute to the development of weight gain. Therefore medications that selectively suppress eating of such foods would be useful in clinical practice. We compared the effects of the glutamatergic antagonists memantine and MTEP to dexfenfluramine in baboons given periodic access to highly palatable food and ad libitum access to a standard chow diet. Three days a week baboons received a sugar-coated candy during the first meal and standard standard-diet chow pellets were available in subsequent meals. All baboons derived a greater amount of energy from the single single-candy meal than from the standard diet across an entire day. Pre-treatment with dexfenfluramine, memantine, and MTEP produced decreases in candy consumption without altering candy-seeking behaviour. At the same time, dexfenfluramine and memantine, but not MTEP, produced a decrease in seeking and consumption of standard chow pellets. Both memantine and MTEP are promising agents for the treatment of obesity.

Effects of oleoyl-estrone with dexfenfluramine, sibutramine or phentermine on overweight rats.

We studied the combination of oleoyl-estrone with either dexfenfluramine, sibutramine or phentermine in overweight male rats treated for 10 days in order to determine whether they shared a mechanism of action. Oleoyl-estrone, dexfenfluramine and sibutramine decreased body weight and energy (essentially lipids); losses were higher when combined with oleoyl-estrone. Glycemia was maintained except under phentermine; oleoyl-estrone induced decreases in triacylglycerols, cholesterol, insulin and HOMA (homeostasis model assessment). Combination of oleoyl-estrone and sibutramine resulted in the loss of up to 29% body energy in 10 days. Energy expenditure was maintained. The effects of oleoyl-estrone and dexfenfluramine or sibutramine on appetite were substantially additive. All oleoyl-estrone-treated rats showed increased insulin sensitivity. In conclusion, combined treatment of overweight rats with oleoyl-estrone and sibutramine or dexfenfluramine results in a dramatic loss of weight and fat, whilst maintaining circulating energy homoeostasis.

Prescription weight loss pill use among Americans: patterns of pill use and lessons learned from the fen-phen market withdrawal.

BACKGROUND: Despite the popularity of antiobesity medications, there is a lack of population-based data on their use. In addition, response (termination of pill use and receipt of an echocardiogram) to the fenfluramine and dexfenfluramine market withdrawal among the public has not been described. Lessons learned from this event have implications for future withdrawals. METHODS: We used data from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) a random-digit telephone survey. In 1998, six states included detailed questions about the use of prescription weight loss pills in the previous 2 years, n = 16,460 noninstitutionalized adults aged 18 years or older. RESULTS: Almost one third of prescription weight loss pills users were not obese before taking pills. Family and friends and other nonphysicians were reported as sources of medication by one in ten users. One third of users also reported taking nonprescription diet products. Among fenfluramine or dexfenfluramine users, one third continued pill use after the market withdrawal and only one quarter received echocardiograms. CONCLUSIONS: Despite enormous publicity, many persons continued to use fen-phen after the market withdrawal and most did not receive follow-up echocardiograms. Our study raises issues regarding the effectiveness of withdrawal warnings in a small but significant subset. Additional means of communicating risk to individuals are needed for future product withdrawals including special strategies for those lacking healthcare coverage.

[Treatment of childhood obesity]. / Obesità in età pediatrica: trattamento.

This article provides current guidelines on the treatment and prevention of childhood obesity. Since factors involved in obesity change with age, the therapeutic approach in pre-school children will be different from pupils and adolescents. The treatment will also be modulated on the basis of weight excess, weight gain velocity and complications. The main goal of the treatment should be to encourage the child and his family to have healthy lifestyle. Families who are not ready for change might benefit from counselling to improve motivation before starting treatment. A detailed alimentary and behavioural history is the start point of the treatment. The strategy of the intervention is to induce changes at three levels: 1) attitudes of parents; 2) physical activity; 3) energy intake. The treatment of the adolescents should take into account the pubertal changes and the psychological aspects of this peculiar period of life. Obesity is a chronic disease and its treatment needs long-life follow-up. The long-term results of the obesity treatment are often disappointing and we have to consider consistent prevention programs for better results.

Anorexigen-induced cardiac valvulopathy and female gender.

Obesity is a chronic disorder that is associated with significant co-morbidity and early mortality. Since the 1970s, amphetamines and amphetamine analogs have been trialed for weight loss. In 1997, the anorexigen agents, fenfluramine (Pondimin; AH Robins, Richmond, VA) and dexfenfluramine (Redux; Wyeth-Ayerst, Philadelphia, PA) gained worldwide attention when reports of associated cardiac valvulopathy and pulmonary hypertension emerged. A landmark report from the Mayo Clinic describing valvular heart disease (VHD) among women exposed to the anorexigen agent combination phentermine-fenfluramine ignited widespread concern, and the products were voluntarily withdrawn from the market by the manufacturers. Currently, the causal relationship between anorexigen agent use and valvulopathy has been validated, yet the extent and complexity of this important clinical issue remains ill-defined.

Efficacy of dexfenfluramine in the treatment of alcohol dependence.

BACKGROUND: A substantial body of evidence supports a role for serotonin in modulating alcohol intake, which suggests that this neurotransmitter represents a promising target for pharmacotherapy development for alcohol use disorders. Dexfenfluramine. a serotonin releaser and reuptake inhibitor, decreases alcohol self-administration by rats. Its greater potency and several mechanisms of action suggest it should be more effective in treating alcohol dependence than drugs that only inhibit serotonin reuptake. METHODS: We conducted an 11 week, randomized, double-blind trial that compared oral placebo and dexfenfluramine 7.5, 15, 22.5, and 30 mg bid in 136 alcohol-dependent patients. A brief behavioral intervention was offered concurrently. RESULTS: The majority of subjects were male (72%), and the age of the group was 44 +/- 1 years (mean +/- SD). Both placebo- and drug-treated groups significantly reduced alcohol consumption compared with baseline (a 55% decrease in mean drinks per day; p < 0.01), but there were no significant differences between drug and placebo groups or dose effects for most outcome measures. CONCLUSIONS: Our results with dexfenfluramine are further evidence that serotonergic medications on their own do not significantly reduce alcohol consumption in alcohol-dependent individuals. Combination pharmacotherapy with agents that act on different receptors or neurotransmitter systems (e.g., naltrexone plus dexfenfluramine) may be one way to enhance serotonergic effects on drinking behavior and should be considered in future medication development clinical trials.

Efficacy of fenfluramine and dexfenfluramine in the treatment of obesity: a meta-analysis.

A meta-analysis was conducted to estimate the difference of weight loss among patients treated with placebo and with fenfluramine or dexfenfluramine after 1, 2, 3, 6, and 12 months of treatment. Placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized clinical trials, whose results were presented as weight loss by the placebo group and the drug-treated patient group, were selected for the analysis. For the pooled estimations, the method of the weighted means by the inverse of the variance was used. The association between the difference of means and several predictive variables was studied by means of weighted linear regression. Patients treated with fenfluramine or dexfenfluramine achieved a higher weight loss than those receiving placebo in all the periods studied. The greatest efficacy was observed after 3 months of treatment. Beyond this time, there is a decline in the effectiveness. Based on the efficacy data, treatments longer than 3 months would not be justified.