Increased Arbekacin Clearance in Patients With Febrile Neutropenia.

BACKGROUND: Arbekacin (ABK) is used to treat infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and is used widely for the treatment of febrile neutropenia (FN). As ABK has a narrow therapeutic concentration window, the dosage must be adjusted via therapeutic drug monitoring. However, the influence of the physiology of patients with FN on the pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters of ABK remains unclear. Therefore, we examined this influence on ABK PK parameters. METHOD: We performed a retrospective cohort study using data from patients with a hematologic malignancy who were ≥18 years and had been administered ABK. We excluded patients who did not receive therapeutic drug monitoring and had an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) of <30 mL/min, because clinically sufficient data would not be available. RESULT: Of the 99 enrolled patients, 25 did not have FN and 74 had FN. Arbekacin clearance (CLabk) was shown to correlate with eGFR in patients with FN (r = 0.32, P = 0.0062) and without FN (r = 0.50, P = 0.01). CLabk was higher in patients with FN than in those without FN. In addition, in the eGFR of <100 mL/min group (normal renal function), CLabk and CLabk/eGFR were also higher in patients with FN than in those without FN. CONCLUSIONS: CLabk was increased in patients with FN and normal renal function; therefore, we propose an increased ABK dose for patients with FN and normal renal function.

Population Pharmacokinetic Analyses for Arbekacin after Administration of ME1100 Inhalation Solution.

ME1100, an inhalation solution of arbekacin, an aminoglycoside, is being developed for the treatment of hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia. The objective of these analyses was to develop a population pharmacokinetic model to describe the arbekacin concentration-time profile in plasma and epithelial lining fluid (ELF) following ME1100 administration. Data were obtained from a postmarketing study for an intravenous (i.v.) formulation of arbekacin, a phase 1 study of ME1100 in healthy volunteers, and a phase 1b study of ME1100 in mechanically ventilated subjects with bacterial pneumonia. Data from the postmarketing study were utilized to develop a population pharmacokinetic model following i.v. administration, and this model was subsequently utilized as the foundation for development of the model characterizing arbekacin disposition following inhalation of ME1100. The final model utilized two compartments for both plasma and ELF disposition, with movement of arbekacin between the ELF and plasma parameterized using linear first-order rate constants. A bioavailability term was included for the inhalational route of administration, which was estimated to be 19.5% for a typical subject. The model included normalized creatinine clearance (CLcrn) and weight as covariates on arbekacin clearance: CL = (weight/52.2)0.855·[(CLcrn-77)·0.0289 + 2.32]. The model simultaneously described arbekacin concentrations following both i.v. and inhaled administration and provided acceptable fits to the plasma and ELF data (r2 of 0.922 and 0.557 for observed versus fitted concentrations, respectively). The developed model will be useful for conducting future analyses to support ME1100 dose selection.

Efficacy and pharmacokinetics of ME1100, a novel optimized formulation of arbekacin for inhalation, compared with amikacin in a murine model of ventilator-associated pneumonia caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Background: Arbekacin is an aminoglycoside that shows strong antimicrobial activity against Gram-positive bacteria, including MRSA, as well as Pseudomonas aeruginosa . The therapeutic effectiveness of arbekacin is directly related to C max at the infection site. To maximize drug delivery to the respiratory tract and minimize the systemic toxicity, arbekacin optimized for inhalation, ME1100, is under development. In this study, we investigated the efficacy and pharmacokinetics of ME1100 in a murine model of ventilator-associated pneumonia caused by P. aeruginosa by using a customized investigational nebulizer system. Methods: The mice were treated for 5 min, once daily, with placebo, 3, 10 or 30 mg/mL ME1100 or 30 mg/mL amikacin. Results: In the survival study, the survival rate was significantly improved in the 10 and 30 mg/mL ME1100 treatment groups compared with that in the placebo group. The number of bacteria in the lungs was significantly lower in the 30 mg/mL ME1100 treatment group at 6 h after the initial treatment, compared with all other groups. In the pharmacokinetic study, the C max in the 30 mg/mL ME1100 treatment group in the epithelial lining fluid (ELF) and plasma was 31.1 and 1.2 mg/L, respectively. Furthermore, we compared the efficacy of ME1100 with that of amikacin. Although there were no significant differences in ELF and plasma concentrations between 30 mg/mL of ME1100 and 30 mg/mL of amikacin, ME1100 significantly improved the survival rate compared with amikacin. Conclusions: The results of our study demonstrated the in vivo effectiveness of ME1100 and its superiority to amikacin.

Population pharmacokinetics of arbekacin in different infectious disease settings and evaluation of dosing regimens.

The efficacy of arbekacin in patients with MRSA infections is influenced by the peak concentration (Cpeak)/MIC ratio (≧8). A daily arbekacin dose of 4-6 mg/kg is primarily used for the treatment of MRSA infection. However, clinical pharmacokinetic studies of arbekacin that evaluate changes in patients with different infectious diseases have been limited. This study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of arbekacin in different infectious diseases and to evaluate its dosing regimens. This work describes a single-centre, retrospective study. The pharmacokinetic parameters of arbekacin were calculated from individual serum-concentration data using WinNonlin ver. 6.3. A total of 331 serum samples were obtained from 170 patients. Our drug concentration-time data were well described by a two-compartment open model. The final model showed that drug clearance was related to creatinine clearance and that the total distribution volume (Vd) was related to actual body weight and the presence of bacteremia. The individual Vd in bacteremia patients was significantly higher than those of other patients (bacteremia: 29.7 ± 0.5 L, pneumonia: 20.8 ± 0.4 L, other infections: 21.4 ± 0.4 L; p < 0.05). Additionally, Monte Carlo simulation showed that target (Cpeak/MIC â‰§ 8) attainment was only 10.1%, even at a dose of 6 mg/kg, especially for MRSA bacteremia patients with an arbekacin MIC = 2 µg/mL. In conclusion, our study revealed that the Vd may be higher in bacteremia patients than in patients with other infectious diseases. Therefore, an increase in the daily dose of arbekacin should be considered for bacteremia patients.

Clinical efficacy and safety of arbekacin for high-risk infections in patients with hematological malignancies.

We performed a clinical trial to investigate the efficacy and safety of arbekacin (ABK), a unique aminoglycoside with activity against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), in patients with hematological malignancies complicated by high-risk infections. ABK was administered intravenously at a dose of approximately 5 mg/kg with various broad-spectrum ß-lactams, followed by therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). A total of 54 febrile or infectious episodes were registered, and TDM was performed in 44 (81%) cases. The absolute neutrophil count was below 500/µl in 49 (91%) cases, and cytotoxic chemotherapy was being administered in 47 (87%) cases. Before initiation of ABK, 52 (96%) patients had received fluoroquinolones (n = 37) and/or broad-spectrum ß-lactams (n = 34). There were 10 cases of documented infections including one of MRSA pneumonia, and 44 cases of febrile neutropenia. The efficacy at the end of treatment was 80% for all patients, and efficacy was significantly higher in patients attaining maximum concentrations ≥ 16 µg/ml or receiving TDM-guided dose-adjustment of ABK (n = 19, 95 vs. 71%, P = 0.039). Renal toxicity was observed in six cases (11%) but was generally acceptable. This study demonstrated that TDM-guided ABK administration may be applicable under limited conditions for patients with hematological malignancies.

Pharmacokinetics of arbekacin in bronchial epithelial lining fluid of healthy volunteers.

INTRODUCTION: Arbekacin is a unique aminoglycoside antibiotic with anti-methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus activity. The efficacy of aminoglycosides is related to their serum maximum concentration. Local concentration of antibiotics in pulmonary epithelial lining fluid, rather than its serum concentration, can help determine its clinical efficacy more precisely for treatment of respiratory infectious disease. The objective of this study was to sequentially measure arbekacin concentration in epithelial lining fluid after infusion of a single clinically available dose. METHOD: After the initial blood sampling, arbekacin was intravenously infused into 6 healthy volunteers over 1 h. Epithelial lining fluid and serum samples were collected by bronchoscopic microsampling 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 5, and 6 h after the start of 200 mg arbekacin infusion. RESULTS: Each probe sampled 10.1 ± 5.2 µl bronchial epithelial lining fluid. The sample dilution factor was 266.7 ± 157.1. Drug concentration was successfully measured in all but 2 of the epithelial lining fluid samples. The maximum concentration of arbekacin in epithelial lining fluid and serum was 10.4 ± 1.9 µg/ml and 26.0 ± 12.2 µg/ml, respectively. The ratio of the maximum drug concentration in the epithelial lining fluid to that in the serum was 0.47 ± 0.19. CONCLUSIONS: The maximum concentration of epithelial lining fluid reached levels that would effectively treat most clinical strains of methicillin-resistant S. aureus.

[Safety and pharmacokinetics of 400 and 600 mg arbekacin sulfate to healthy male volunteers].

We assessed the safety and pharmacokinetics of arbekacin sulfate (ABK, brand name: Habekacin injection) in single and 7-day multiple administration of ABK 400 and 600 mg as potency to healthy male volunteers. In the single administration of ABK 400 and 600 mg (over 30 min, drip infusion), C(max) values were 41.0 +/- 3.6 microg/mL and 63.0 +/- 9.9 microg/mL, respectively. Serum ABK concentrations at 60 min (C(peak)) after the start of administration were 23.2 +/- 2.9 microg/mL and 38.5 +/- 3.3 microg/mL, respectively, and the mean serum ABK concentrations at 24 hr (C(trough)) after the start of administration were less than 0.4 microg/mL (LOQ: limited of quantitation). C(max), Cpeak and AUC(0-infinity) were increased with doses, and t1/2, CL(tot), CL(r) V(ss) and urinary excretion were comparable at both doses. In the multiple administration of ABK 400 and 600 mg (over 30 min, drip infusion) once a day for 7 days, C(max0, C(peak) and AUC(0-infinity) were comparable from the 1st day through to 7th day and increased with doses. After the administration, the serum ABK concentrations were decreased with time, and the means of C(trough) were 0.4 microg/mL (LOQ) -0.5 microg/mL, which showed ABK has no tendency toward accumulation. In addition, t1/2, CL(tot), CL(r) V(ss) and urinary excretion were constant throughout administration days at either dose, and CL(tot) containing CL(r) was not decreased. There were no notable changes in the functions of the kidney, auditory organs, etc. Based on the above-mentioned results, when ABK 400 or 600 mg was intravenously administered over 30 min once or once a day for 7 days to the healthy male volunteers with normal renal clearance, it is suggested there were no problems in terms of safety, and C(max) were 36.7-54.1 and 44.2-78.5 microg/mL, respectively. In addition, C(trough) was 0.5 microg/mL or lower at either doses and ABK was not accumulated in multiple administration of ABK. ABK was, therefore, expected to have good safety profile and favorable pharmacokinetics.

Clinical efficacy and safety of arbekacin sulfate in patients with MRSA sepsis or pneumonia: a multi-institutional study.

Arbekacin (ABK) is an aminoglycoside and widely used in Japan for treatment of patients infected with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Although, ABK has concentration-dependent antibacterial activity, the peak serum concentration (C (peak)) of ABK has not yet been fully investigated as an indicator of the efficacy of ABK. The present study was conducted in patients admitted to hospitals affiliated with the ABK Dose Finding Study Group, between October 2008 and June 2011, who had pneumonia or sepsis, the cause of which was identified or suspected to be MRSA. The initial target C (peak) was set at 15-20 µg/mL and therapeutic drug monitoring was conducted. Then the relationship between serum concentration and efficacy/safety of ABK was prospectively examined to obtain sufficient clinical efficacy. In total, 89 patients from 11 clinical sites in Japan were enrolled and 29 of these patients were subjected to efficacy analysis. The mean initial dose and C (peak) were 306.9 mg/day and 16.2 µg/mL, respectively. The efficacy rate was 95 % (19/20 patients) at 5-6 mg/kg or higher, 87.5 % (7/8) for sepsis and 90.5 % (19/21) for pneumonia, and the overall efficacy rate was 89.7 % (26/29). There was no increase in the incidence of adverse events. In conclusion, we recommend the initial dose of ABK at 5-6 mg/kg or higher and the dosage regimen should be adjusted to achieve C (peak) at 10-15 µg/mL or higher in the treatment of patients with pneumonia or sepsis caused by MRSA. This strategy would surely achieve low incidence of adverse events while obtaining high clinical efficacy.

Evaluation of arbekacin anti-MRSA agents for adult in Japan.

There are a limited number of reports that compare the clinical efficacy of anti-MRSA agents such as arbekacin (ABK), vancomycin (VCM), teicoplanin (TEIC) and linezolid (LZD). There is a tendency for these four agents to show variation in the inflammatory response parameters, in C-reactive protein (CRP) and in white blood cell count (WBC), depending on the administration period. There was no significant difference among the agents in analysis of variance (ANOVA) in the group of days 1-3 (p = 0.0536) but there was some significant difference in the group of days 4-7, as well as days 8-14 (p < 0.001, p < 0.01) in relative variation rate of CRP. Furthermore, we compared in more detail the groups of LZD, VCM and ABK, with a significant decrease of CRP, each of which showed more decrease in comparison with the group of TEIC in the period days 4-7 (p < 0.01). We took 1-hr serum level after days 3-4, with the ABK treatment as the peak concentration (C(peak)). Having made nonlinear logistic regression analysis of CRP and C(peak)/MIC, we concluded that the decrease rate estimable by early inflammatory effect could be decreased to some 40%, assuming that C(peak)/MIC shows the high value within 4 days after ABK treatment.

[Arbekacin sulfate concentrations in peripheral lymph and in serum after intravenous injection: report of four cases].

Antibiotic levels in serum are commonly used to guide antibiotic therapy. The antibiotic levels in peripheral lymph are a more accurate reflection of the efficacy of antibiotic penetration into the tissues of patients with complicated skin and soft-tissue infections. The pharmacokinetics of arbekacin sulfate (ABK) in peripheral lymph after systemic administration has not been studied. Four patients (cases 1-4) with skin and soft-tissue infections (average age 74.3 years, range 54 to 85) received 200 mg of ABK intravenously once a day either by slow bolus (5min.) or by slow infusion (60 min.). The serum concentrations collected 60min. after the start ofABK infusion (C60) and the peripheral lymph concentrations of ABK were measured. 55 min. after initiation of slow 5-min. bolus (case 1), C60 was 32.5l microg/mL. The daily average concentration of ABK in peripheral lymph after slow bolus (case 1) was 14.84 microg/mL. The ratio peripheral lymph on daily average/C60 was 0.46. Patients (cases 2, 3 and 4) had been intravenously administered ABK at an infusion time of 60 min. C60 (cases 2, 3 and 4) were 14.10, 11.48 and 8.26 microg/mL, respectively. The daily average concentration of ABK in peripheral lymph after slow infusion (case 2) was 7.80 microg/mL. The average concentrations of ABK in peripheral lymph during the third eight hours since slow infusion (cases 3 and 4) were 0.72 and 2.23 microg/mL. The ratio peripheral lymph/C60 was 0.55, 0.06 and 0.27, respectively. An increase in the serum peak concentration of ABK may lead to considerable elevation of the concentration of ABK in peripheral lymph.

The efficacy and safety of high-dose arbekacin sulfate therapy (once-daily treatment) in patients with MRSA infection.

The efficacy and safety of once-daily high-dose arbekacin sulfate therapy for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection were evaluated, with analysis of their relationship to blood drug levels. The study was conducted in patients with pneumonia or sepsis, the cause of which was suspected to be MRSA, who were admitted to the Nagasaki University Hospital or its affiliated hospitals between January 2009 and December 2010. The initial drug dose was set at a level expected to yield the goal peak of 20 µg/ml and a trough level of less than 2 µg/ml, using the Habekacin Therapeutic Drug Monitoring analysis software. Thirteen patients were enrolled: 10 patients had pneumonia and 3 patients had sepsis. Patient mean age was 72.0 years; mean initial drug dose was 269.2 mg. Clinical efficacy at completion of treatment and bacterial eradication-reduction were achieved in 66.7% (6/9) and 62.5% (5/8) of patients, respectively. Incidence of adverse reactions was 38.5% (5/13). In analysis of efficacy in relationship to serum drug levels, the peak drug level was 22.7 ± 5.50 µg/ml, on average, and 15 µg/ml or higher in all 6 responders. Also, in patients with renal dysfunction, it seemed to be essential to ensure a certain peak drug level and to control the trough level appropriately. Although the number of patients was limited, once-daily high-dose arbekacin sulfate therapy may be highly effective, without posing any major safety problems. Further larger-scale studies are needed.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of once-daily arbekacin during continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration in critically ill patients.

This study examined the pharmacokinetics of arbekacin during continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) and assessed the pharmacodynamics to consider arbekacin dosage adaptation in CVVHDF. Arbekacin was administered by 0.5-h infusion once daily, using a polymethyl methacrylate membrane hemofilter, to three critically ill patients undergoing CVVHDF; the flow rates were 0.8 l/h for the filtrate and 0.6 l/h for the dialysate. The drug concentrations in plasma and in the filtrate-dialysate were determined using a fluorescence polarization immunoassay and analyzed pharmacokinetically. The average sieving coefficient of arbekacin was 0.739 and the average drug clearance by CVVHDF was 1.03 l/h. A pharmacokinetic model with three compartments (1, central; 2, peripheral; 3, filtrate-dialysate side hemofilter) accurately reflected the concentration-time data for both plasma and filtrate-dialysate. The pharmacokinetic model assessed the pharmacodynamic profile of arbekacin once-daily regimens (0.5-h infusions) at filtrate-dialysate flow rates of 1.4 and 2.8 l/h, and demonstrated that only the 150-mg and 200-mg regimens achieved an effective target range for C(max) (9-20 microg/ml), suggesting that empirical dosages lower than the usual 150-200 mg should be avoided in patients undergoing CVVHDF. The minimum regimens needed to achieve an effective pharmacodynamic target for the free C(max)/MIC ratio (>8) were 75 mg for an MIC of 0.5 microg/ml, 200 mg for an MIC of 2 microg/ml, and 400 mg for an MIC of 4 microg/ml. These results will help us to better understand the pharmacokinetics of arbekacin during CVVHDF, while also helping in the selection of the appropriate arbekacin regimens, based on a pharmacodynamic assessment, for patients receiving this renal replacement therapy.

Effect of PEGylation of N-WASP181-200 on the inhibitory potency for renal aminoglycoside accumulation.

We previously showed that a 20-residue basic peptide, N-WASP181-200 (NISHTKEKKKGKAKKKRLTK), inhibits renal accumulation of aminoglycoside antibiotics such as gentamicin and arbekacin. The aim of this study is to determine whether PEGylation of N-WASP181-200 enhances its inhibitory potency for renal accumulation of aminoglycosides. N-terminally PEGylated peptide (PEG1k-N-W) was synthesized by conjugating N-WASP181-200 with PEG of approximately 1 kDa using the Fmoc protection/deprotection method. PEG1k-N-W decreased gentamicin binding to isolated rat renal brush-border membrane in a concentration-dependent manner, but the in vitro inhibitory potency of PEG1k-N-W was weaker than that of N-WAP181-200. On the other hand, under in vivo conditions, PEG1k-N-W decreased the renal accumulation of arbekacin more potently than N-WASP181-200. When injected intravenously, PEG1k-N-W showed a 1.7-fold longer plasma half-life relative to N-WASP181-200. In addition, the stability of N-WASP181-200 in renal brush-borer membrane suspension was found to be increased by PEGylation. Our findings suggest that PEGylation of N-WASP181-200 is a useful strategy for reducing dosage of the concomitant with which to decrease renal accumulation in the kidney, leading to prevention of aminoglycoside-induced nephrotoxicity.

Recommended dose of arbekacin, an aminoglycoside against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, does not achieve desired serum concentration in critically ill patients with lowered creatinine clearance.

OBJECTIVE: To define the pharmacokinetics of arbekacin (ABK), an aminoglycoside, in patients with acutely lowered renal function. METHODS: We measured the serum concentrations of ABK, using fluorescence polarization immunoassay, in 10 critically ill patients (patient group) and six healthy volunteers (control group). Data were analysed with a two-compartment model and parameters were estimated by the Bayesian method. The Mann-Whitney U-test or chi-squared test was used as appropriate (P < 0.05). RESULTS: Creatinine clearance (CCR), measured or estimated using Cockcroft and Gault's formula of the patient group (CCR: 58 +/- 13 mL/min), was significantly lower than that of the control group (CCR: 99 +/- 8 mL/min). However, despite the low CCR, even the maintenance ABK dosage for normal CCR did not elevate the highest serum level (C(max)) to the effective range in the patient group. Although the ABK clearance (CL) did not differ between the groups, the patients' distribution volume (V(d)) increased significantly compared with the control. The transfer rate constant from central to peripheral compartment (k(12)) in the patient group was much higher than that in the control. CONCLUSION: In critically ill patients with lowered CCR, the ABK dose for normal CCR subjects does not elevate its serum concentration to effective levels because of augmented V(d) caused by increased k(12). The present results hypothesize that adjustment of antibiotic dosing according to CCR further lowers C(max) in critically ill patients with reduced CCR.

Evaluation of the clinical application of cystatin C, a new marker of the glomerular filtration rate, for the initial dose-setting of arbekacin.

OBJECTIVE: Recent studies have shown that serum cystatin C is a better marker for measuring the glomerular filtration rate (GFR) than the conventional method, using serum creatinine concentration. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical application of serum cystatin C as a marker of GFR to determine the initial dosage of arbekacin, an antibiotic primarily excreted via the kidneys. In this study, the predictability of serum arbekacin peak and trough concentrations were assessed using estimated population mean GFR values calculated from either serum creatinine (Cockcroft-Gault equation) or cystatin C (Sjöström equation) concentrations. METHOD: Ninety-five patients treated with arbekacin for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection were divided into three groups according to their GFR values estimated by the serum cystatin C concentration as follows: normal to mild (GFR > 70 mL/min, n = 40), moderate (30

Population pharmacokinetics of arbekacin in burn patients.

The aim of this study was to estimate the pharmacokinetics (PK) of arbekacin in burn patients using a population-PK approach. Therapeutic drug monitoring data consisting of 126 plasma concentrations (including 17 values that were below the quantitation limit) from 47 burn patients were retrospectively analyzed using a mixed effect method (NONMEM, ver. 6.0). Covariates, such as burn index, age, sex, among others, were tested on the basic one-compartment model. In the basic model, positive correlations of body weight (WT) and creatinine clearance (CLcr) on total clearance (CL) and volume of distributions (V) were assumed. In the final model, V increased with burn index (BI). The final model was: CL(L/h) = 3.18x WT/ 70 + 4.49x CLcr/120; V(L) = 27.5x WT/70 + 0.28x (BI-23.5). Between-subject variability in terms of CL and V were 35 and 39%, respectively. The CL of our burn patients was significantly greater than that reported in unburned patients, and V increased proportionally with increasing BI.

Influences of dosage regimen and co-administration of low-molecular weight proteins and basic peptides on renal accumulation of arbekacin in mice.

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to characterize renal accumulation of arbekacin, an aminoglycoside antibiotic for treatment of infections with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus, and to modulate renal uptake of arbekacin, leading to prevention of arbekacin-induced nephrotoxicity. METHODS: In vivo renal uptake studies were performed using mice. Renal concentrations of arbekacin after a bolus intravenous administration at various doses were analysed by HPLC. In addition, renal concentrations were investigated 24 h after an injection of arbekacin alone or in combination with low-molecular weight proteins and basic peptides. RESULTS: When administered by bolus injection at various doses, renal accumulation of arbekacin showed saturation kinetics with increasing dose. Renal concentration of arbekacin after a bolus administration remained constant from 4 to 24 h and subsequently decreased by a first-order process with a half-life of 42.7 h. The influences of three dosage regimens (a single injection of 4 mg/kg, two injections of 2 mg/kg and three injections of 1.33 mg/kg) were investigated. A single injection resulted in lower renal level of arbekacin than the multiple administrations. Co-administration of cytochrome c, lysozyme and N-WASP181-200 decreased renal accumulation of arbekacin in a dose-dependent manner. N-W(N1n), N-W(N1n,I2i,S3s) and N-W(N1n,K20k), in which the N- and/or C-terminal regions of N-WASP181-200 were substituted by one to three D-isomers, more potently decreased renal arbekacin accumulation than N-WASP181-200. CONCLUSIONS: These data may be useful for prevention of arbekacin-induced nephrotoxicity owing to reduction of renal accumulation of the aminoglycoside.

[Analysis of factors in selecting anti-methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus drugs by doctors].

Three types of medication, Arbekacin, Vancomycin, and Teicoplanin, are used primarily to treat MRSA infections. These medications differ in their respective anti-bacterial actions, antibacterial spectrums, and pharmacokinetics. Proper use and dosage is required, and is based on patient background and the conditions of infection, among other factors. This study was conducted for a period of over one year at St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Yokohama City Seibu Hospital. It was designed to compare the conditions as they related to why doctors ordered a certain drug, the background, and their clinical examination values. The tendency to avoid selection of Arbekacin Sulfate (ABK) for patients who had kidney dysfunction was recognized, although there were a few exceptions made. Other than that, there were not any standard criteria set in selecting which medication to prescribe. Therefore, it is necessary to examine the appropriateness of the selection since ordering anti-MRSA medication seemed to depend on each doctor's own experience. Serum concentration was measured in order to avoid any side effects. Moreover, cases of young people, normal renal function and malignant tumor patients were recognized in which serum concentration of the anti-MRSA medications was not within the therapeutic range of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). This was to show that there is a possibility the medications involved were not sufficiently effective. Therefore, in the future it will be necessary to ensure that proper dosing instructions are followed.

Prediction of aminoglycoside response against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection in burn patients by artificial neural network modeling.

OBJECTIVE: To predict the response of aminoglycoside antibiotics (arbekacin: ABK) against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) infection in burn patients after considering the severity of the burn injury by using artificial neural network (ANN). Predictive performance was compared with logistic regression modeling. METHODOLOGY: The physiologic data and some indicators of the severity of the burn injury were collected from 25 burn patients who received ABK against MRSA infection. A three-layered ANN architecture with six neurons in the hidden layer was used to predict the ABK response. The response was monitored using three clinical criteria: number of bacteria, white blood cell count, and C-reactive protein level. Robustness of models was investigated by the leave-one-out cross-validation. RESULTS: The peak plasma level, serum creatinine level, duration of ABK administration, and serum blood sugar level were selected as the linear input parameters to predict the ABK response. The area of the burn after skin grafting was the best parameter for assessing the severity of the burn injury in patients to predict the ABK response in the ANN model. The ANN model with the severity of the burn injury was superior to the logistic regression model in terms of predicting the performance of the ABK response. CONCLUSION: Based on the patients' physiologic data, ANN modeling would be useful for the prediction of the ABK response in burn patients with MRSA infection. Severity of the burn injury was a parameter that was necessary for better prediction.

[Appropriate usage of antibiotics by therapeutic drug monitoring].

Aminoglycosides are mainly distributed in the extracellular fluid, so when they are given to neonates who have a large amount of extracellular fluid, their distribution is increased. In our data, the volume of distribution (Vd) of Arbekacin in the neonates was twice that of the adults, 0.54 l/kg. Therefore, the dose per weight of aminoglycosides to the neonates should be increased more than to the adults. In the renal function of the neonates, differentiation of the nephron is completed within 36 weeks after conception, but it is functionally immature. In our data, renal drug excretion increased rapidly in the post-conceptional ages (PCAs) of 34-35 weeks. Consequently, we based the Arbekacin administration schedule for the neonates on the PCAs. There is excellent correlation between serum level of vancomicin (VCM) and dose x serum creatinine (Scr)/weight in the haemodialysis patients, suggesting that we can use weight and Scr to set the VCM administration schedule for these patients. We also established on administration schedule of Teicoplanin for the haemodialysis patients. In this article, we present the TDM analysis result of the antibiotics in our hospital.