Cystatin C as a potential biomarker for dosing of renally excreted drugs.

The objective of the present study was to review the available pharmacokinetic evidence for the utility of cystatin C (CysC) as a marker of renal function to predict the dose of renally excreted drugs.The bibliographic search used PubMed and EMBASE databases, from its inception through to January 2014, with the following keywords 'pharmacokinetics' and 'cystatin C'.Sixteen pharmacokinetic publications were identified and seven drugs primarily excreted by the kidney were studied. Among them, only one study was performed in children, the others were performed in adults and/or elderly subjects, either healthy volunteers or patients with variable clinical conditions, such as cystic fibrosis and cancer. Most of studies (n = 13/16) demonstrated that CysC was better correlated with clearance/trough concentration of evaluated drugs compared with creatinine.Our review supports that CysC is a good marker of renal function to predict dose of renally excreted drugs. Efforts should be made to evaluate the impact of CysC in special populations in order to define its clinical value in dosing optimization.

Clinical drug-drug interaction assessment of ivacaftor as a potential inhibitor of cytochrome P450 and P-glycoprotein.

Ivacaftor is approved in the USA for the treatment of cystic fibrosis (CF) in patients with a G551D-CFTR mutation or one of eight other CFTR mutations. A series of in vitro experiments conducted early in the development of ivacaftor indicated ivacaftor and metabolites may have the potential to inhibit cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C8, CYP2C9, CYP3A, and CYP2D6, as well as P-glycoprotein (P-gp). Based on these results, a series of clinical drug-drug interaction (DDI) studies were conducted to evaluate the effect of ivacaftor on sensitive substrates of CYP2C8 (rosiglitazone), CYP3A (midazolam), CYP2D6 (desipramine), and P-gp (digoxin). In addition, a DDI study was conducted to evaluate the effect of ivacaftor on a combined oral contraceptive, as this is considered an important comedication in CF patients. The results indicate ivacaftor is a weak inhibitor of CYP3A and P-gp, but has no effect on CYP2C8 or CYP2D6. Ivacaftor caused non-clinically significant increases in ethinyl estradiol and norethisterone exposure. Based on these results, caution and appropriate monitoring are recommended when concomitant substrates of CYP2C9, CYP3A and/or P-gp are used during treatment with ivacaftor, particularly drugs with a narrow therapeutic index, such as warfarin.

Detection of digoxin in urine samples by surface-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometry with dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction.

A novel method for the detection of digoxin using dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (DLLME) coupled to the surface-assisted laser desorption/ionization mass spectrometric detection (SALDI/MS) was developed. Acetone and chloroform were used as the disperser solvent and extraction solvents, respectively. After the extraction, digoxin was detected using SALDI/MS with colloidal palladium as the matrix. Under optimal extraction and detection conditions, the calibration curve, which ranged from 0.01 to 0.50 µM, was observed to be linear. The limit of detection (LOD) at a signal-to-noise ratio of 3 was 2 nM for digoxin. With a sample-to-extract volume ratio of 400, the enrichment factor for digoxin was calculated to be 252. This novel method was successfully applied for the determination of digoxin in human urine samples.

Predicting and manipulating cardiac drug inactivation by the human gut bacterium Eggerthella lenta.

Despite numerous examples of the effects of the human gastrointestinal microbiome on drug efficacy and toxicity, there is often an incomplete understanding of the underlying mechanisms. Here, we dissect the inactivation of the cardiac drug digoxin by the gut Actinobacterium Eggerthella lenta. Transcriptional profiling, comparative genomics, and culture-based assays revealed a cytochrome-encoding operon up-regulated by digoxin, inhibited by arginine, absent in nonmetabolizing E. lenta strains, and predictive of digoxin inactivation by the human gut microbiome. Pharmacokinetic studies using gnotobiotic mice revealed that dietary protein reduces the in vivo microbial metabolism of digoxin, with significant changes to drug concentration in the serum and urine. These results emphasize the importance of viewing pharmacology from the perspective of both our human and microbial genomes.

Molecularly imprinted SPE and MEKC with in-capillary sample preconcentration for the determination of digoxin in human urine.

Molecularly imprinted solid-phase extraction (MISPE) combined with MEKC was used for clean-up, preconcentration and determination of digoxin in the presence of its aglycon digoxin (digoxigenin) in human urine samples. In addition, the use of an in-capillary sample concentration electrophoretic technique by sweeping was investigated to enhance the concentration sensitivity in MEKC. The highly selective, fast and effective sample pretreatment by MISPE along with the preconcentration by sweeping could overcome the low sensitivity of the highly efficient capillary electrophoresis separation with UV detection. The optimization of the variables affecting the separation as well as MISPE conditions procedure was carried out to select the best conditions of selectivity and sensitivity to determine digoxin at low concentration levels in urine. To demonstrate the suitability of the developed method several analytical characteristics (selectivity, linearity, accuracy, precision, and LOD) were evaluated. Satisfactory results were obtained in terms of linearity (r > 0.99), recovery (95.4-96.5% with RSD from 1.3% to 2.6%), precision (RSD from 0.3% to 1.7% for migration times and from 2.1% to 7.3% for corrected peak areas), and sensitivity (LODs of 6 µg/L with 5 mL of sample or 1.2 µg/L with 25 mL). The proposed MISPE-MEKC method was satisfactorily applied to the analysis of spiked human urine samples achieving a concentration factor up to 7500-fold.

Effect of telaprevir on the pharmacokinetics of midazolam and digoxin.

In this open-label study, 24 healthy volunteers received a single intravenous (IV) dose of 0.5 mg of midazolam on day 1 and a single oral dose each of 2 mg of midazolam and 0.5 mg of digoxin on day 3. Telaprevir 750 mg every 8 hours was administered from day 8 through day 23, along with a single IV dose of 0.5 mg of midazolam on day 17 and single oral doses of 2 mg of midazolam and 0.5 mg of digoxin on day 19. Midazolam, 1'-hydroxymidazolam, digoxin, and telaprevir concentrations in plasma and digoxin concentrations in urine were measured and pharmacokinetic parameters calculated. On comparing administration with versus without telaprevir, the geometric least squares mean ratios (with 90% confidence limits) for IV midazolam were 1.02 (0.80, 1.31) for maximum observed concentrations (C(max)) and 3.40 (3.04, 3.79) for area under the curve from 0 to 24 hours (AUC(0-24h)); for oral midazolam 2.86 (2.52, 3.25) for C(max) and 8.96 (7.75, 10.35) for AUC(0-24h); and for oral digoxin 1.50 (1.36, 1.65) for C(max) and 1.85 (1.70, 2.00) for area under the curve from 0 to infinity (AUC(0-∞)). Coadministration of telaprevir with oral midazolam resulted in approximately 3-fold decrease in the mean AUC(0-∞) of 1'-hydroxymidazolam. The renal clearance of digoxin was similar with or without telaprevir. Results show that telaprevir is an inhibitor of CYP3A and P-glycoprotein.

In vitro P-glycoprotein interactions and steady-state pharmacokinetic interactions between tolvaptan and digoxin in healthy subjects.

Interactions between tolvaptan and digoxin were determined in an open-label, sequential study where 14 healthy subjects received tolvaptan 60 mg once daily (QD) on days 1 and 12 to 16 and digoxin 0.25 mg QD on days 5 to 16. Mean maximal concentrations (C(max)) and area under the curve during the dosing interval (AUC(τ)) for digoxin with tolvaptan (day 16) were increased 1.27- and 1.18-fold compared with digoxin alone (day 11); mean renal clearance of digoxin was decreased by 59% (P < .05). Tolvaptan C(max) and AUC(0-24h) for a single dose with digoxin (day 12) were each increased about 10% compared with tolvaptan alone (day 1). Tolvaptan did not accumulate upon multiple dosing. After a single dose of tolvaptan (day 1, day 12), 24-hour urine volume was about 7.5 L. As expected, after 5 days of tolvaptan, 24-hour urine volume decreased about 20%. In vitro studies in control and MDR1-expressing LLC-PK1 cells indicate that tolvaptan is a substrate of P-glycoprotein. Tolvaptan (50 µM) inhibited basolateral to apical digoxin secretion to the same extent as 30 µM verapamil; the IC50 of tolvaptan was determined to be 15.9 µM. The increase in steady-state digoxin concentrations is likely mediated by tolvaptan inhibition of digoxin secretion.

Development and validation of an LC-MS method with electrospray ionization for quantitation of digoxin in human plasma and urine: application to a pharmacokinetic study.

A highly sensitive and specific LC-MS method was developed and validated for the quantification of digoxin in human plasma and urine using d5-dihydrodigoxin as internal standard (IS). The assay procedure involved extraction of digoxin and IS from human plasma with chloroform-isopropanol (95:5, v/v). Chromatogrphic separation was achieved on a Spherisorb ODS2 column using a gradient mobile phase with 5 mmol/L ammonium acetate in water with 1% acetic acid and acetonitrile. The mass spectrometer was operated in the selected ion monitoring mode using the respective [M+K](+) ions, m/z 819.4 for digoxin and m/z 826.4 for IS. The method was proved to be accurate and precise at linearity range of 0.12-19.60 ng/mL in plasma with a correlation coefficient (r(2)) of >or=0.9968 and 1.2-196.0 ng/mL in urine. The limit of quantification achieved with this method was 0.12 ng/mL in plasma and 1.2 ng/mL in urine. The intra- and inter-assay precision and accuracy values were found to be within the assay variability limits as per the FDA guidelines. The developed assay method was successfully applied to a pharmacokinetic study in human volunteers following intravenous administration of digoxin.

Absence of an effect of a single-dose deferasirox on the steady-state pharmacokinetics of digoxin.

UNLABELLED: Deferasirox (Exjade, ICL670) is a potent iron chelator, recently approved as first-line therapy for the treatment of blood-transfusion-related iron overload. Iron deposition in the heart may lead to cardiac dysfunction in patients with iron overload. Thus, the combination of cardiac glycosides and deferasirox is likely to be used in clinical practice. OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to investigate the effect of deferasirox on steady-state pharmacokinetics of digoxin. As digoxin is a P-glycoprotein substrate, the trial also explored the potential of deferasirox to alter the pharmacokinetics of compounds transported by P-glycoprotein in general. METHODS: An open-label, randomized, 2-period, crossover study was carried out with 16 healthy volunteers. During both treatment periods, each subject received daily oral doses of digoxin for 8 days (0.5 mg on Day 1 and 0.25 mg/day on Days 2 - 8). In one of these treatment periods, single oral deferasirox 20 mg/kg was coadministered with digoxin on Day 8. Pharmacokinetic parameters assessed at the end of each treatment period were compared using the standard statistical analysis for bioequivalence assessment. RESULTS: Deferasirox did not alter the steady-state pharmacokinetics of digoxin. The geometric mean ratios and 90% confidence intervals for Cmax and AUCtau of digoxin (with/without deferasirox) were 0.93 (0.82 - 1.06) and 0.91 (0.83 - 1.00), respectively, and thus within the equivalence limits of 0.8 - 1.25. The amount of digoxin excreted intact in urine was similarly unaltered by coadministration of deferasirox. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that single-dose deferasirox has no effect on steady-state pharmacokinetics of digoxin. Therefore, no dose adjustment of digoxin is necessary when deferasirox and digoxin are coadministered. The lack of interaction suggests that deferasirox is unlikely to interact with P-glycoprotein substrates.

Sensitive and specific LC-MS assay for quantification of digoxin in human plasma and urine.

Digoxin, a commonly prescribed cardiac glycoside with a narrow therapeutic window, is routinely used in pharmacokinetic studies to assess the in vivo activity of the drug efflux pump P-glycoprotein. To minimize adverse events, a sub-therapeutic dose of digoxin is usually administered, producing low plasma concentrations requiring a sensitive detection technique. Commonly available immunoassay techniques do not provide the required sensitivity to measure these low plasma concentrations and are potentially non-specific in certain subject populations. Previously published mass spectrometric techniques require either large plasma volumes or a tandem mass spectrometer. To overcome these challenges we have developed a sensitive and specific LC-MS method for the quantification of digoxin in small volumes of human plasma and urine. Plasma (1 mL) was extracted with methyl t-butyl ether under basic conditions followed by LC-MS detection of the sodium adducts of digoxin (803.4 m/z) and digitoxin (787.4 m/z, internal standard). Linearity and accuracy were demonstrated across a wide range of digoxin plasma concentration (0.05-1.5 ng/mL). This specific, sensitive, validated digoxin LC-MS assay can be used to quantify sub-therapeutic digoxin plasma concentrations in men and women (pregnant and non-pregnant).

Effects of pregnancy on CYP3A and P-glycoprotein activities as measured by disposition of midazolam and digoxin: a University of Washington specialized center of research study.

The objectives of the study were to evaluate the effects of pregnancy on CYP3A and P-glycoprotein (P-gp) activities, as measured by disposition of midazolam and digoxin, respectively. Thirteen women received digoxin (0.25 mg p.o.) and midazolam (2 mg p.o.) in random order, separated by 1-2 weeks at 28-32 weeks gestation, and the same order was repeated at 6-10 weeks postpartum. Plasma and urine concentrations were determined by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry and analyzed by noncompartmental methods. Midazolam CL/F(unbound) (593 +/- 237 l/min vs. 345 +/- 103 l/min; P = 0.007), digoxin CL(Renal, unbound) (272 +/- 45 ml/min vs. 183 +/- 37 ml/min; P < 0.002) and digoxin CL(secretion,) (unbound) (109 +/- 34 ml/min vs. 58 +/- 22 ml/min; P < 0.002) were higher during pregnancy than postpartum. These data are consistent with increased hepatic and/or intestinal CYP3A and renal P-gp activities during pregnancy.

Effect of NXY-059, a novel neuroprotectant, on the pharmacokinetics of a single dose of digoxin in healthy subjects.

OBJECTIVE: NXY-059 is a novel free-radical trapping neuroprotectant. Digoxin treatment is common in acute ischaemic stroke, the intended patient population for NXY-059. Since both digoxin and NXY-059 are eliminated primarily renally, with a substantial contribution by active renal secretion, and because digoxin has a narrow therapeutic window, this open, randomised, crossover, two-period study investigated whether NXY-059 affects the pharmacokinetics (PK) of digoxin. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Twenty-two healthy subjects received 0.5 mg oral digoxin 2 h after the start of 60-h intravenous infusions of NXY-059 and placebo separated by a 14-day washout. Blood and urine were collected for 60 h. Digoxin concentrations were measured by a novel liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry assay. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The ratio of the geometric mean (90% confidence interval) between NXY-059 and placebo for the digoxin area under the concentration-versus-time curve was 0.91 (0.83-0.99) and was within the predefined range for no interaction (0.80-1.25). No safety concerns were raised in the study. No serious adverse events were recorded. The most common adverse event was headache with similar frequencies in the two treatments. CONCLUSIONS: NXY-059 had no clinically significant effect on the PK of digoxin.

Unexpectedly dangerous escargot stew: oleandrin poisoning through the alimentary chain.

A female, aged 43 and a male, aged 66, experienced gastrointestinal and cardiovascular symptoms after a meal including snail stew. Twelve hours after the ingestion, they presented with nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and cardiovascular symptoms typical of acute toxic digoxin ingestion and were hospitalized. The man's electrocardiogram was altered, and the woman's was normal. Serum digoxin levels, measured on a Roche COBAS Integra 800 with the Roche On-Line Digoxin reagent, were 1.14 and 1.00 nmol/L, respectively. Potassium levels were normal in both patients. The serum digoxin concentration decreased on the second day, and symptoms resolved on the third day with patients fully recovered (i.e., reversion to a normal sinus rhythm). Cardiac-glycoside-like intoxication symptoms follow the ingestion of leaves or flowers of Nerium oleander. The consumed snails were suspected to be responsible for the intoxication. In the homogenized snail tissue, the concentration expressed in digoxin equivalents was 0.282 nmol/g. The presence of oleandrin and oleandrigenin in the snails was confirmed by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry analysis, which was performed on a ionic-trap Finnigan LXQ instrument using an electrospray ionization interface. High-pressure liquid chromatographic separation was performed on a C18 column with a gradient of methanol/water. An extract of oleander leaves was used as reference.

Influence of coadministration on the pharmacokinetics of azimilide dihydrochloride and digoxin.

The influence of coadministration on digoxin and azimilide pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics was assessed in a randomized, 3-way crossover study in 18 healthy men. Serial blood and urine samples were obtained for azimilide and digoxin quantitation. Treatment effects on pharmacokinetics were assessed using analysis of variance. The relationship between azimilide blood concentrations and QT(c) prolongation was characterized by an E(max) model. Effects of coadministration on pharmacodynamics were assessed using a mechanistic-based inhibition model. Azimilide pharmacokinetics was unaffected by digoxin, except for a 36% increase in CL(r) (P = .0325), with no change in CL(o). Digoxin pharmacokinetics was unaffected by azimilide, except for a 21% increase in C(max) (P = .0176) and a 10% increase in AUC(tau) (P = .0121). Digoxin coadministration increased the apparent EC(50) with no effect on E(max), consistent with competitive inhibition (K(i) = 0.899 ng/mL). The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic changes observed upon coadministration were small and are not expected to be clinically important.

Ritonavir decreases the nonrenal clearance of digoxin in healthy volunteers with known MDR1 genotypes.

Our objective was to examine the influence of ritonavir on P-glycoprotein (P-gp) activity in humans by characterizing the effect of ritonavir on the pharmacokinetics of the P-gp substrate digoxin in individuals with known MDR1 genotypes. Healthy volunteers received a single dose of digoxin 0.4 mg orally before and after 14 days of ritonavir 200 mg twice daily. After each digoxin dose blood and urine were collected over 72 hours and analyzed for digoxin. Digoxin pharmacokinetic parameter values were determined using noncompartmental methods. MDR1 genotypes at positions 3435 and 2677 in exons 26 and 21, respectively, were determined using PCR-RFLP analysis. Ritonavir increased the digoxin AUC(0-72) from 26.20 +/- 8.67 to 31.96 +/- 11.24 ng x h/mL (P = 0.03) and the AUC(0-8) from 6.25 +/- 1.8 to 8.04 +/- 2.22 ng x h/mL (P = 0.02) in 12 subjects. Digoxin oral clearance decreased from 149 +/- 101 mL/h x kg to 105 +/- 57 mL/h x kg (P = 0.04). Other digoxin pharmacokinetic parameter values, including renal clearance, were unaffected by ritonavir. Overall, 75% (9/12) of subjects had higher concentrations of digoxin after ritonavir administration. The majority of subjects were heterozygous at position 3435 (C/T) (6 subjects) and position 2677 (G/T,A) (7 subjects); although data are limited, the effect of ritonavir on digoxin pharmacokinetics appears to occur across all tested MDR1 genotypes. Concomitant low-dose ritonavir reduced the nonrenal clearance of digoxin, thereby increasing its systemic availability. The most likely mechanism for this interaction is ritonavir-associated inhibition of P-gp. Thus, ritonavir can alter the pharmacokinetics of coadministered medications that are P-gp substrates.

Contribution of increased oral bioavailability and reduced nonglomerular renal clearance of digoxin to the digoxin-clarithromycin interaction.

AIMS: A clinically important interaction between the cardiac glycoside digoxin and the antibiotic clarithromycin has been suggested in earlier reports. The aim of this study was to investigate the extent of the interaction and the relative contribution of different mechanisms. METHODS: In a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind cross-over design single oral doses of 0.75 mg digoxin with oral coadministration of placebo or 250 mg clarithromycin twice daily for 3 days were administered to 12 healthy men. Additionally, three of the subjects received single intravenous doses of 0.01 mg x kg(-1) digoxin with oral placebo or clarithromycin. Digoxin plasma and urine concentrations were determined by a highly sensitive radioimmunoassay. RESULTS: Oral coadministration of clarithromycin resulted in a 1.7-fold increase of the area under the digoxin plasma concentration-time curve [mean AUC(0,24) +/- SD 23 +/- 5.2 vs. 14 +/- 2.9 microg x L(-1) x h; 95% confidence interval (CI) on the difference 7.0, 12; P = 0.002] and in a reduction of the nonglomerular renal clearance of digoxin [mean ClRng(0, 24) +/- SD 34 +/- 39 vs. 57 +/- 41 mL min-1; 95% CI on the difference 7.2, 45; P = 0.03]. The ratios of mean digoxin plasma concentrations with and without clarithromycin were highest during the absorption period of clarithromycin. After intravenous administration digoxin AUC(0,24) increased only 1.2-fold during coadministration of clarithromycin. CONCLUSIONS: Increased oral bioavailability and reduced nonglomerular renal clearance of digoxin both contribute to the interaction between digoxin and clarithromycin, probably due to inhibition of intestinal and renal P-glycoprotein.

Interaction study between digoxin and a preparation of hawthorn (Crataegus oxyacantha).

Hawthorn, an herbal supplement, is currently being evaluated for the treatment of heart failure. The flavonoid components of hawthorn may be responsible for hawthorn's beneficial effects in the treatment of heart failure. However, these components may also affect P-glycoprotein function and cause interactions with drugs that are P-glycoprotein substrates, such as digoxin, which is also used to treat heart failure. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine the effect of hawthorn on digoxin pharmacokinetic parameters. A randomized, crossover trial with 8 healthy volunteers was performed evaluating digoxin 0.25 mg alone (D) for 10 days and digoxin 0.25 mg with Crataegus special extract WS 1442 (hawthorn leaves with flowers; Dr. Willmar Schwabe Pharmaceuticals) 450 mg twice daily (D + H) for 21 days. Pharmacokinetic studies were performed for 72 hours. There were no statistically significant differences in any measured pharmacokinetic parameters. The AUC0-infinity, Cmax-Cmin, Cmin, and renal clearance for the D group were 79 +/- 26 mcg.h/L, 1.4 +/- 0.7 mcg/L, 0.84 +/- 0.2 mcg/L, and 74 +/- 10 mL/min versus 73 +/- 20 mcg.h/L, 1.1 +/- 0.1 mcg/L, 0.65 +/- 0.2 mcg/L, and 81 +/- 22 mL/min for the D + H group, respectively (p > 0.05). Following 3 weeks of concomitant therapy, hawthorn did not significantly alter the pharmacokinetic parameters for digoxin. This suggests that both hawthorn and digoxin, in the doses and dosage form studied, may be coadministered safely.

Heterogeneous post-column immunoreaction detection using magnetized beads and a laboratory-constructed electromagnetic separator.

The nature of immune reactors allows development of quantitative analytical methods that are highly selective and can often be used directly with complex biological matrixes such as blood, plasma or urine. A major limitation of immunoassay is that antibodies are sometimes unable to discriminate structurally similar species such as drug metabolites and synthetic analogs. The problem associated with the lack of discrimination can be circumvented by coupling immunoassay with liquid chromatography post-column. The most commonly used separation method in post-column immunoreaction detection is the affinity column. Affinity columns may create undesired effects such as a compromise of the chromatographic separation efficiency, the requirement for an antibody with fast reaction kinetics and the need for flushing the column. This paper reports a post-column immunoreaction detection system coupled with a laboratory-constructed on-line magnetic separation flow chamber that is designed to overcome these problems. The system uses disposable magnetic beads as a solid-phase support for separation that can be easily removed from the system. The model analytes chosen for this study were digoxin and its metabolites due to the commercial availability of monoclonal antibodies for these compounds. Digoxin was separated using a chromatographic method prior to being interfaced through a liquid handler system to the immunoreactor. Compatibility of the HPLC mobile phase was determined to be acceptable with a mixing ratio of 1:3 between the LC fraction and immunoreagent solution. The dynamic range of the calibration curve in digoxin-spiked phosphate buffer was found to be 0.25-12 ng/ml and a quadratic fit was found to provide the best fit to the data with a correlation coefficient of 0.9974. The residual error for all standards was less than 15%. The percentage RSDs for the two controls, 2 and 10 ng/ml, were 6.88 and 4.82% (n = 6) and the percentage errors were 7.07 and -6.89% (n = 6), respectively.

P-glycoprotein-mediated intestinal and biliary digoxin transport in humans.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Intestinal transport by P-glycoprotein is a recently recognized determinant of drug disposition. However, direct measurements of transporter-mediated drug elimination into isolated segments of human small intestine are lacking. METHODS: Using a recently developed intestinal perfusion catheter, we perfused in healthy volunteers two 20-cm jejunal segments with and without the P-glycoprotein inhibitor quinidine before and during administration of the P-glycoprotein inducer rifampin (INN, rifampicin). RESULTS: Within 3 hours after intravenous administration of digoxin (1 mg), perfusate samples were collected. We found that 0.45% +/- 0.24% and 0.83% +/- 0.60% of the digoxin dose were eliminated into a jejunal segment and into bile, respectively. Perfusion of the isolated segment with quinidine reduced intestinal digoxin elimination (0.23% +/- 0.08%, P =.031). During rifampin, intestinal digoxin elimination was 0.80 +/- 0.59 (P =.383). Enterocyte P-glycoprotein content correlated with the area under the plasma concentration-time curve of digoxin (Spearman nonparametric correlation coefficient [r(S)] = -0.73, P =.003) and digoxin nonrenal clearance (r(S) = 0.52, P =.056), as well as with intraluminal and plasma concentrations of quinidine (r(S) = 0.55, P =.041 and r(S) = -0.67, P =.009, respectively). CONCLUSION: Using segmental intestinal perfusion, we provide direct evidence that intestinal P-glycoprotein mediates substantial drug elimination after intravenous administration from the systemic circulation into the gut lumen and prevents entry of luminally administered P-glycoprotein substrates into the enterocytes. These data also highlight the relative importance of direct intestinal drug secretion in comparison with drug elimination through bile.

The effect of erythromycin and clarithromycin on the pharmacokinetics of intravenous digoxin in healthy volunteers.

Several case reports have suggested an interaction between digoxin and macrolide antibiotics. The authors investigated the effect of erythromycin and clarithromycin on the pharmacokinetics of intravenously administered digoxin (0.5 mg) in healthy subjects. Nine male subjects participated in three studies (digoxin alone, digoxin with erythromycin, and digoxin with clarithromycin). Subjects took erythromycin (800 mg per day) or clarithromycin (400 mg per day) on the day before digoxin dosing and during the kinetic study, Neither of the macrolides affected serum digoxin concentration-time curves. However, more than 1.3-fold increases in urinary digoxin excretions were observed during erythromycin and clarithromycin coadministration compared with digoxin alone. There were significant differences in renal clearance between macrolide coadministration and the control condition (digoxin alone: 98.4 ml/min; digoxin with erythromycin: 137.3 ml/min; digoxin with clarithromycin: 133.6 ml/min). In conclusion, neither erythromycin nor clarithromycin has a significant effect on serum digoxin disposition after an intravenous administration. Renal digoxin excretion is not inhibited but rather enhanced by both macrolides.