Dyspepsia in the middle ages: a reference in Giovanni Boccaccio's Decameron (14th century AD)?

.

'The voice of the stomach': the mind, hypochondriasis and theories of dyspepsia in the nineteenth century.

Physicians and surgeons during the nineteenth century were eager to explore the causes of stomach and intestinal illnesses. Theories abounded that there was a sympathy between the mind and the body, especially in the case of the dyspepsia. The body was thought to have physical symptoms from the reactions of the mind, especially in the case of hypochondriasis. Digestive problems had a mental component, but mental anguish could also result from physical problems. Dissertations from aspiring as well as established physicians probed the mental causes of irritable bowel diseases and other diseases in the medical literature. Healing was thought to come from contextualizing the link between the problems of the mind and the resulting physical problems of the body.

[Brief analysis of professor YAN Jie's academic thought on functional dyspepsia treated with acupuncture and moxibustion].

The brief discussion is introduced in the paper on the academic thought of professor YAN Jie, the contemporary famous TCM doctor, on functional dyspepsia treated with acupuncture and moxibustion. Treatment based on "the three-regional acupoint selection" is applied to professor YAN's treatment for functional dyspepsia, in which, acupuncture is on Sibai (ST 2), Liangmen (ST 21) and Zusanli (ST 36), and the supplementary points are added accordingly. The academic thought is described as the combination of acupuncture and moxibustion based on strengthening healthy qi, supplemented by soothing the liver and psychological counseling. Also, an example is provided.

From ischochymia to gastroparesis: proposed mechanisms and preferred management of dyspepsia over the centuries.

Dyspeptic symptoms are common with most patients suffering functional disorders that remain a therapeutic challenge for medical practitioners. Within the last three decades, gastric infection, altered motility, and hypersensitivity have gained and lost traction in explaining the development of functional dyspepsia. Considering these shifts, the aim of this review was to analyze changing understanding of and approaches to dyspepsia over a longer time period. Monographs, textbooks, and articles published during the last three centuries show that our understanding of normal gastric function has improved dramatically. With increased insight came new ideas about disease mechanisms, diagnostic options, and treatments. Despite shifts over time, the importance of functional abnormalities was recognized early on and explained in the context of societal influences and stressors, anxieties, and biological influences, thus resembling the contemporary biopsychosocial model of illness. Symptoms were often attributed to changes in secretion, motility, and sensation or perception with technological innovation often influencing proposed mechanisms and treatments. Many of the principles or even agents applied more than a century ago are still part of today's approach. This includes acid suppression, antiemetics, analgesics, and even non-pharmacologic therapies, such as gastric decompression or electrical stimulation of the stomach. This historical information does not only help us understand how we arrived at our current state of knowledge and standards of care, it also demonstrates that enthusiastic adoption of various competing explanatory models and the resulting treatments often did not survive the test of time. In view of the benign prognosis of dyspepsia, the data may function as a call for caution to avoid the potential harm of overly aggressive approaches or treatments with a high likelihood of adverse effects.

Early history of dyspepsia and peptic ulcer in the United States.

In Scotland, dyspepsia was first recorded in the mid-eighteenth century; its marked increase preceded the rise in the occurrence of gastric and duodenal ulcer. The aim of the present study was to analyze the earliest available statistics of dyspepsia and peptic ulcer in the United States and compare their trends with those previously reported for Scotland. We analyzed the annual in- and outpatient records of hospitals and dispensaries in Philadelphia, New York, and Boston for 1750-1920. The cumulative number of cases in each diagnostic category from 5 consecutive years was divided by the resident population of the same period and expressed as average annual rate per million population.We found that dyspepsia was first recorded in hospital statistics at the end of the eighteenth century and increased markedly thereafter. It remained a common diagnosis throughout the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. Hospital admissions for gastric ulcer started to rise only in the last quarter of the nineteenth century, followed, with a 20-year delay, by a similar rise in the occurrence of duodenal ulcer. Proportional admission rates for dyspepsia were similar among men and women. Gastric ulcer was more common in women; duodenal ulcer was more common in men. Similar trends were observed in the three cities. Our analysis supports the contention that non-ulcer dyspepsia has long been distinct from peptic ulcer.

Whither dyspepsia? A historical perspective of functional dyspepsia, and concepts of pathogenesis and therapy in 2009.

Functional dyspepsia is a highly prevalent but heterogeneous disorder; multiple pathogenetic mechanisms are likely involved but the underlying causal pathways in functional dyspepsia remain obscure. The term functional dyspepsia was popularized by the famed Walter Alvarez at the Mayo Clinic early last century. Prominent Australian gastroenterologists who have contributed to our understanding of functional dyspepsia include Peter Baume, Barry Marshall, Douglas Piper, Nick Talley, John Kellow, and Gerald Holtmann. Specific dyspeptic symptoms have not generally correlated very well with any particular physiologic disturbance, although gastric disaccommodation and duodenal eosinophilia have been linked to early satiety in this condition. Genetic markers have been tentatively identified, and functional dyspepsia can follow bacterial gastroenteritis. No objective diagnostic tools for functional dyspepsia are currently agreed upon, although meal induction of symptoms appears reproducible and may have diagnostic utility. The symptomatic criteria for functional dyspepsia (Rome III criteria) are based on expert consensus and the exclusion of organic causes. Various therapeutic modalities for functional dyspepsia have been explored; however, empirical approaches are still employed for the treatment of functional dyspepsia. Better approaches for functional dyspepsia are likely to follow an improved understanding of the underlying pathophysiological abnormalities.

History of dyspepsia in Scotland. Admissions to the Edinburgh Royal Infirmary 1729-1830, doctoral theses 1726-1823, and contemporary British publications.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of the study was to assess whether the rise in the occurrence of dyspepsia in Scotland during the eighteenth century was a true epidemiologic phenomenon or just an increase in medical awareness. METHODS: Admissions for dyspepsia to the Edinburgh Royal Infirmary from 1729 until 1830 were analysed by consecutive five-year time periods. The titles of MD theses on dyspepsia from 1726 to 1823 were extracted from the Edinburgh University index. Monographs and articles on dyspepsia from Britain during the same time period were sought in the Catalogues of the US Surgeon-General's Library. RESULTS: During the eighteenth century, the annual number of dyspepsia patients admitted to the Edinburgh Royal Infirmary showed an extraordinary increase from none in 1730 to 900 per million population in 1760. About 4000 MD theses were presented to the Edinburgh University between 1726 and 1823. There were none on dyspepsia or gastritis between 1726 and 1749, after when it gradually started to rise. British publications on dyspepsia similarly appeared only in the 1790s and then rapidly increased. DISCUSSION: We suggest that the rise in MD theses and publications on dyspepsia were responses to a real increase in dyspepsia during the mid eighteenth century.

Three centuries of stomach symptoms in Scotland.

BACKGROUND: Stomach pain and discomfort have been reported since antiquity. AIM: To follow the time trends since the 18th century of dyspepsia, gastric ulcer, duodenal ulcer, and benign oesophageal disease to test when dyspepsia started to become a major clinical problem. METHODS: The annual in- and out-patient records of the last three centuries from the Scottish Royal Infirmaries of Edinburgh, Aberdeen, Glasgow and Dundee were analysed. In addition, dispensary attendances, clinicians' casebooks, students' notebooks and medical texts have been scrutinized for historic statistics of upper gastrointestinal disease. RESULTS: Dyspepsia was first recorded in the 1750s and increased markedly subsequently. Such dyspepsia persisted after gastric and duodenal ulcers appeared in the late 19th century and then declined again in the late 20th century. Non-ulcer dyspepsia has remained the commonest diagnosis made after endoscopy for stomach pain in the beginning of the 21st century. CONCLUSION: The current commonest diagnosis of stomach pain, dyspepsia dates from the mid-18th century. Any explanations of its causation need to consider this timing.

Review article: The history of hypnotherapy and its role in the irritable bowel syndrome.

Hypnosis is a technique by which an individual can gain a degree of control over physiological as well as psychological function. This paper reviews the history of the phenomenon as well as the accumulating evidence that it is effective in relieving the symptoms of irritable bowel syndrome and improving the quality of life of sufferers. The physiological effects of hypnosis are also discussed coupled with an outline of how a hypnotherapy service might be provided.

Alimentary diseases in the poor and middle class in London 1773-1815, and in New York poor 1797-1818.

BACKGROUND: Although dyspepsia has been described for thousands of years, few studies have analysed its incidence before the 19th century when peptic ulcer first became a major dyspepsia-producing disease. METHODS: The incidence of alimentary disease around 1800 was examined in three private practices for the fee-paying middle class and in five public dispensaries for the poor in London, as well as in one dispensary in New York. RESULTS: The proportions of attendances for alimentary disorders were identical, 16%, in each of the three groups. Diarrhoea and dysentery were twice as common in the London dispensary than in private practice, presumably because of poor sanitation. Dyspepsia showed a similar incidence in the London dispensary and private practice, but was only half as common in New York. Worms were three times more common in dispensary patients in New York than in London. The incidence of diarrhoea and dyspepsia indicated no significant time trends over 43 years. None of the alimentary causes of death showed peptic ulcer at necropsy, and both haematemesis and intestinal haemorrhage were rare. CONCLUSIONS: Around 1800, the infrequent deaths from alimentary conditions suggested that the ulcer epidemic had not yet started. Instead, it is probable that the dyspepsia was similar to the non-ulcer dyspepsia of today.

Hospital admissions for peptic ulcer and indigestion in London and New York in the 19th and early 20th centuries.

The occurrence of peptic ulcer increased rapidly in all Western countries from the 19th to the 20th century, attributed to a possible epidemic of Helicobacter pylori, a new pathogenic strain, or a change in host susceptibility. The early trends in hospital admissions for peptic ulcer and dyspepsia in London and New York during the 19th century are reviewed to test these hypotheses.