Randomized Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial of Dutasteride for Reducing Heavy Drinking in Men.

BACKGROUND: Prior studies indicate that neuroactive steroids mediate some of alcohol's effects. Dutasteride, widely used to treat benign prostatic hypertrophy, is an inhibitor of 5-alpha reductase enzymes, which play a central role in the production of 5α-reduced neuroactive steroids. The purpose of this study was to test dutasteride's tolerability and efficacy for reducing drinking. METHODS: Men (n = 142) with heavy drinking (>24 drinks per week) and a goal to either stop or reduce drinking to nonhazardous levels were randomized to placebo or 1 mg dutasteride daily for 12 weeks. We hypothesized that dutasteride-treated patients would be more successful in reducing drinking. RESULTS: Generalized linear mixed models that included baseline drinking, treatment, time and their 2-way interaction identified significant interactions of treatment-time, such that dutasteride treatment reduced drinking more than placebo. During the last month of treatment, 25% of dutasteride-treated participants had no hazardous drinking (no heavy drinking days and not more than 14 drinks per week) compared with 6% of placebo-treated participants (P = 0.006; NNT = 6). Sensitivity analysis identified baseline drinking to cope as a factor associated with larger reductions in drinking for dutasteride compared with placebo-treated participants. Dutasteride was well tolerated. Adverse events more common in the dutasteride group were stomach discomfort and reduced libido. CONCLUSION: Dutasteride 1 mg daily was efficacious in reducing the number of heavy drinking days and drinks per week in treatment-seeking men. The benefit of dutasteride compared with placebo was greatest for participants with elevated baseline drinking to cope motives.

Long-term efficacy and safety of dutasteride 0.5 mg in Korean men with androgenetic alopecia: 5-year data demonstrating clinical improvement with sustained efficacy.

Dutasteride 0.5 mg is a dual inhibitor of 5α-reductase type I and II and was approved in Korea in 2009 for treating androgenetic alopecia (AGA) in men. We investigated the 5-year efficacy and safety of dutasteride 0.5 mg in Korean men with AGA using the basic and specific (BASP) classification. This retrospective analysis included 99 male AGA patients aged ≥18 years who were treated with dutasteride 0.5 mg for at least 5 years from October 2009 to December 2016 at Kyung Hee University Hospital in Gangdong. Patient photographs were scored using the BASP classification, and the Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) was performed using a seven-point scale. Patient improvement (IGA score ≥1) and prevention of disease progression (IGA score ≥0) were 89.9% (89/99) and 93.9% (93/99), respectively. According to the BASP classification, 52.5% (52/99) of the basic type, 75% (15/20) of the specific F type, and 82.2% (60/73) of the specific V type showed clinical improvement after 5 years of treatment. Dutasteride demonstrated long-term safety and efficacy in Korean male patients with AGA over a period of at least 5 years, with results comparable to those of other long-term efficacy studies of finasteride 1 mg in male patients with AGA.

[Hepatotoxicity by tamsulosin / dutasteride: report of a probable case]. / Hepatotoxicidad por tamsulosina / dutasterida: reporte de un caso probable.

Tamsulosin and dutasteride are drugs widely used to treat benign prostatic hypertrophy. having a good safety profile. There are few reports of liver injury associated with the use of tamsulosin; however, there are no reports of hepatic toxicity from the use of dutasteride and the combined use of tamsulosin/dutasteride. We present the case of a 64-year-old man who developed liver injury after the combined use of tamsulosin/dutasteride, developing a pattern of hepatocellular damage and acute hepatitis symptoms. Viral, autoimmune, and metabolic storage diseases of the liver were ruled out, as well as biliary pathology by means of abdominal ultrasound and resonance cholangiography. In the causality evaluation, CIOMS-RUCAM presented: 6 points (probable) and Naranjo: 4 points (possible). The patient presented a clinical and laboratory response after discontinuing the drug.

Evaluation of the therapeutic effects of AGA drugs by measuring finasteride, dutasteride, and dihydrotestosterone in hair.

BACKGROUND: Androgenetic alopecia (AGA) is treated by 5α-reductase inhibitors (5ARI) such as finasteride and dutasteride, which are widely used as therapeutic agents. However, their pharmacokinetics in target organs (scalp and hair follicles) have not yet been investigated. PURPOSE: To confirm the effective action of finasteride and dutasteride in the hair follicle tissues, we developed a method to measure these concentrations in hair. RESULTS: Compared to the non-detection (N.D.) group, the dihydrotestosterone (DHT) concentrations decreased significantly in both the finasteride and dutasteride groups. The dutasteride group showed significantly lower DHT concentrations among all groups. CONCLUSIONS: Measurement of finasteride, dutasteride, and DHT concentrations in hair would aid in evaluating the drug pharmacokinetics and its therapeutic effects on AGA patients.

Suicidal risk associated with finasteride versus dutasteride among men treated for benign prostatic hyperplasia: nationwide cohort study.

Finasteride, a 5α-reductase inhibitor used in benign prostatic hyperplasia and androgenetic alopecia, has been associated with an increased suicidal risk, whereas it is unclear whether such risk is similar to that for another 5α-reductase inhibitor, dutasteride. We aimed to assess the risk of suicidal behaviours with finasteride relative to dutasteride. A nationwide cohort study was conducted using the French National Health Data System (SNDS). Men aged 50 years or older initiating finasteride 5 mg or dutasteride 0.5 mg in France between 01-01-2012 and 30-06-2016 were included and followed until outcome (suicide death identified from death certificate or self-harm hospitalisation), treatment discontinuation or switch, death, or 31-12-2016. Self-harm by violent means or resulting in admission to an intensive care unit were also examined. Cox proportional hazards models controlled for age and psychiatric and non-psychiatric conditions by inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW). Analyses were stratified according to psychiatric history. The study compared 69,786 finasteride new users to 217,577 dutasteride new users (median age: 72.0 years [Q1-Q3 = 64.5-80.2] vs. 71.1 [Q1-Q3 = 65.0-79.2]). During follow-up, 18 suicide deaths (0.57/1000 person-years) and 34 self-harm hospitalisations (1.08/1000) occurred among finasteride users versus 47 deaths (0.43/1000) and 87 hospitalisations (0.79/1000) among dutasteride users. Overall, finasteride was not associated with an increased risk of any suicidal outcome (IPTW-adjusted Hazard Ratio = 1.21 [95% Confidence Interval .87-1.67]), suicide death or self-harm hospitalisation. However, among individuals with a history of mood disorders, finasteride was associated with an increased risk of any suicidal outcome (25 versus 46 events; HR = 1.64 [95% CI 1.00-2.68]), suicide death (8 versus 10 events; HR = 2.71 [95% CI 1.07-6.91]), self-harm by violent means (6 versus 6 events; HR = 3.11 [95% CI 1.01-9.61]), and self-harm with admission to an intensive care unit (7 versus 5 events; HR = 3.97 [95% CI 1.26-12.5]). None of these risks was significantly increased among individuals without a psychiatric history. These findings do not support an increased risk of suicide with finasteride used in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. However, an increased risk cannot be excluded among men with a history of mood disorder, but this result based on a limited number of events should be interpreted with caution.

Association of 5α-Reductase Inhibitors With Dementia, Depression, and Suicide.

Importance: In recent decades, there has been increased interest in the possible adverse neurological effects of 5α-reductase inhibitors (5-ARIs), which have been used mainly for benign prostatic hyperplasia and androgenic alopecia. Numerous studies and reports have indicated associations of 5-ARIs with depression and suicide. However, most of these studies had methodological shortcomings, and very little is known about the potential association of 5-ARIs with dementia. Objective: To investigate the association of 5-ARI use with all-cause dementia, Alzheimer disease, vascular dementia, depression, and suicide. Design, Setting, and Participants: This Swedish register-based cohort study included 2 236 876 men aged 50 to 90 years between July 1, 2005, and December 31, 2018. Statistical analyses were performed from September 15, 2021, to May 25, 2022. Main Outcomes and Measures: A diagnosis of all-cause dementia, Alzheimer disease, vascular dementia, depression, or completed suicide. Exposures: A recorded prescription in the Swedish national prescription register of finasteride or dutasteride and duration of use. Results: Of 2 236 876 men (median age at the start of follow-up, 55 years [IQR, 50-65 years] and at treatment initiation, 73 years [IQR, 66-80 years]), 70 645 (3.2%) started finasteride treatment, and 8774 (0.4%) started dutasteride treatment. Men taking finasteride or dutasteride were at increased risk of all-cause dementia (finasteride: hazard ratio [HR], 1.22 [95% CI, 1.17-1.28]; dutasteride: HR, 1.10 [95% CI, 1.01-1.20]), Alzheimer disease (finasteride: HR, 1.20 [95% CI, 1.10-1.31]; dutasteride: HR, 1.28 [95% CI, 1.09-1.50]), vascular dementia (finasteride: HR, 1.44 [95% CI, 1.30-1.58]; dutasteride: HR, 1.31 [95% CI, 1.08-1.59]), and depression (finasteride: HR, 1.61 [95% CI, 1.48-1.75]; dutasteride: HR, 1.68 [95% CI, 1.43-1.96]). However, the magnitude of the association decreased over time, and the findings became statistically nonsignificant with continuous exposures over 4 years, except for depression, which showed a constant risk over time, with no differences between finasteride and dutasteride. In contrast, 5-ARIs were not associated with suicide (finasteride: HR, 1.22 [95% CI, 0.99-1.49]; dutasteride: HR, 0.98 [95% CI, 0.62-1.54]). Conclusions and Relevance: This cohort study found that, while men receiving 5-ARI treatment showed a higher risk for dementia in the initial periods after starting treatment, the decreasing magnitude of the association over time suggested that the risk may be, entirely or in part, due to increased dementia detection among patients with benign prostate enlargement. Both finasteride and dutasteride were similarly associated with depression with a constant risk over time, while neither drug was associated with suicide. Prescribing clinicians and potential users should be aware of the possible risks for depression associated with 5-ARI use.

Efficacy and safety of dutasteride with tadalafil add-on therapy in patients with lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of add-on therapy with the phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitor tadalafil in Japanese men with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) treated with dutasteride. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients were enrolled. The participants had a median age of 71.0 (64.8-73.0) years and a median prostate volume of 37.3 (29.7-41.8) mL as measured using transabdominal sonography. The efficacy indicators, such as International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), quality of life (QOL) score, night-time urinary frequency, and night-time maximum voided volume, improved significantly at 4 weeks, and the effects lasted until 24 weeks (IPSS: 9.5 vs. 17.0, QOL: 2.0 vs. 4.0, nocturia: 2.0 vs. 2.0, night-time maximum voided volume: 290.0 vs. 240.0 mL). Overactive bladder symptom score (OABSS) and sexual health inventory for men (SHIM) significantly improved at 12 weeks, and the effects lasted until 24 weeks (OABSS: 3.0 vs. 5.0, SHIM: 11.0 vs. 7.5). However, maximum urine flow and residual urine volume showed no improvement at any point. Adverse events occurred in two cases. Taken together, add-on therapy with tadalafil was effective for patients with LUTS/BPH resistant to dutasteride monotherapy. In addition, this therapy was not associated with severe adverse events.

Comparison of oral minoxidil, finasteride, and dutasteride for treating androgenetic alopecia.

BACKGROUND: Androgenetic alopecia (AGA) is the most common cause of hair loss, often challenging to treat. While oral finasteride (1 mg/d) is an FDA-approved treatment for male AGA, oral minoxidil and oral dutasteride are not approved yet. However, clinicians have been increasingly using these two drugs off-label for hair loss. Recently, Japan and South Korea have approved oral dutasteride (0.5 mg/d) for male AGA. EFFICACY AND SAFETY: A probable efficacy ranking, in decreasing order, is - dutasteride 0.5 mg/d, finasteride 5 mg/d, minoxidil 5 mg/d, finasteride 1 mg/d, followed by minoxidil 0.25 mg/d. Oral minoxidil predominantly causes hypertrichosis and cardiovascular system (CVS) symptoms/signs in a dose-dependent manner, whereas oral finasteride and dutasteride are associated with sexual dysfunction and neuropsychiatric side effects. PHARMACOKINETICS AND PHARMACODYNAMICS: The average plasma half-lives of minoxidil, finasteride, and dutasteride are ∼4 h, ∼4.5 h, and ∼5 weeks, respectively. Minoxidil acts through multiple pathways to promote hair growth. It has been shown as a vasodilator, an anti-inflammatory agent, a Wnt/ß-catenin signaling inducer, and an antiandrogen. Finasteride inhibits 5α-reductase (5AR) type II isoenzyme, while dutasteride inhibits both type I and type II. Thus, dutasteride suppresses DHT levels more than finasteride in the serum and scalp.

Mesotherapy With Dutasteride for Androgenetic Alopecia: A Retrospective Study in Real Clinical Practice.

BACKGROUND: 5-alpha inhibitors are an effective treatment for androgenetic alopecia. Mesotherapy with dutasteride has been proposed as an effective method to improve hair loss and reducing systemic absorption. OBJECTIVE: The main objective was to describe the safety profile of mesotherapy with dutasteride in real clinical practice in a large cohort of patients with androgenetic alopecia. A secondary aim was to describe the effectiveness of this treatment. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A multicentric retrospective study was designed. Patients treated with at least 6 months of follow-up were included in the study. Side effects and response to the treatment were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 541 patients were included. The commonest approach during the first year was to perform the treatment every 3 months. Response to the mesotherapy in monotherapy could be assessed in 86 patients (15.9%) after one year. Most of them presented clinical improvement, being a marked improvement in 33 patients (38.4%). Pain was the most frequent side effect of the treatment (246 patients, 45.5%). No serious or sexual adverse events were detected. CONCLUSION: Mesotherapy with dutasteride was effective in male and female hair loss in real clinical practice. Side effects related to the treatment were mild and self-limited. This therapy may be an effective option for select patients wishing to avoid oral treatment. J Drugs Dermatol. 2022;21(7):742-747. doi:10.36849/JDD.6610.

Bioequivalence Assessment of an Oral Fixed-Dose Formulation of Dutasteride-Tamsulosin 0.5 mg/0.4 mg: A Randomized, Single-Blind, Single-Dose, 2-Period Crossover Study in Mexican Population Under Fasted Conditions.

The aim of the present study was to compare the bioavailability and to demonstrate the bioequivalence between a dutasteride-tamsulosin 0.5 mg/0.4 mg capsule formulation and the regulatory reference drug (Combodart®, GlaxoSmithKline). A randomized, single-blind, single-dose, 2-way crossover study under fasting conditions, with at least a 28-day washout period was carried out in healthy volunteers. Plasma concentrations of drugs were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. The pharmacokinetic analysis included maximum plasma concentration (Cmax ), area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) from time 0 to 72 hours, and AUC from baseline to infinity. The test formulation was considered bioequivalent if the geometric mean ratios (test/reference) were within the predetermined range of 80% to 125%. Safety and tolerability were evaluated by clinical assessment. The confidence intervals for the log-transformed test/reference ratios for dutasteride, Cmax (95.4-109.2) and AUC from baseline to 72 hours (93.2-109.1), and for tamsulosin, Cmax (101.9-119.8), AUC from baseline to the last quantifiable concentration (91.4-106.3) and AUC from baseline to infinity (90.9-103.3), were within the allowed limit specified by the regulatory authorities (80%-125%). In addition, both test and reference drugs were safe and tolerated. These results demonstrated the bioequivalence of test product (Dakart®) compared with Combodart®.

Free combination of dutasteride plus tamsulosin for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia in South Korea: analysis of drug utilization and adverse events using the National Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service database.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the use and safety of free combination therapy (dutasteride and tamsulosin), dutasteride monotherapy, or tamsulosin monotherapy in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). METHODS: This non-interventional retrospective cohort study used claims data from the Korea Health Insurance Review and Assessment-National Patient Sample database. Patients with BPH ≥ 40 years of age receiving combination therapy (dutasteride 0.5 mg and tamsulosin 0.4 mg daily) or dutasteride 0.5 mg, or tamsulosin 0.4 mg daily dose between 2012 and 2017 were included. The frequency, duration of treatment and risk of any adverse event (AE) or serious AE (SAE) was compared for combination therapy versus each monotherapy using non-inferiority testing. RESULTS: Of 14,755 eligible patients, 1529 (10.4%) received combination therapy, 6660 (45.1%) dutasteride monotherapy, and 6566 (44.5%) tamsulosin monotherapy. The proportion of patients treated with combination therapy exceeded the pre-specified 3% threshold for 'frequent' use. Safety results indicated a similar risk of any AE and SAE irrespective of treatment group. The adjusted relative risk for any AE over the treatment observation period comparing combination therapy with dutasteride monotherapy was 1.07 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03, 1.12), and with tamsulosin monotherapy was 0.98 (95% CI 0.95, 1.02) demonstrating non-inferiority. The adjusted relative risk for any SAE was 1.07 (95% CI 0.66, 1.74) and 0.90 (95% CI 0.56, 1.45), compared with dutasteride and tamsulosin monotherapy, respectively. Although the SAE results did not statistically demonstrate non-inferiority of combination therapy based on pre-specified margins, the 95% CI for the risk ratio estimates included the null with a lower limit below the non-inferiority margins, indicating no meaningful differences in SAE risk between groups. Absolute SAE risks were low. CONCLUSION: Combination therapy with dutasteride and tamsulosin is frequently used in real-world practice in South Korea for treatment of BPH and demonstrates a safety profile similar to either monotherapy.

Triple Therapy with Tamsulosin, Dutasteride, and Imidafenacin for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia in Patients with Overactive Bladder Symptoms Refractory to Tamsulosin: Subgroup Analyses of the DIrecT Study.

AIM: To verify if the efficacy of the triple therapy with tamsulosin, dutasteride, and imidafenacin (TDI) is influenced by any background characteristics in patients with overactive bladder (OAB). METHODS: A subanalysis of data from the DIrecT study was conducted. Superiority of TDI over tamsulosin and dutasteride in terms of efficacy based on the Overactive Bladder Symptom Score (OABSS), total International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), IPSS quality of life index, and postvoid residual (PVR) was evaluated in binary subgroups. RESULTS: In the treatment groups, there was a significant interaction of total OABSS with testosterone level (≥4.8 vs. <4.8 ng/mL, p = 0.043) and PVR (≥20 vs. <20 mL, p = 0.018). For the total IPSS, no significant interaction was found except for the IPSS QOL index. For the IPSS QOL index, a significant interaction was found with testosterone level (≥4.8 vs. <4.8 ng/mL, p < 0.0001) as well as with total IPSS and total OABSS. For the PVR, no significant interaction was found except with total OABSS. CONCLUSIONS: Triple therapy with TDI is suggested to be a therapeutic option for benign prostatic hyperplasia in patients with residual OAB symptoms refractory to tamsulosin and in patients with various background characteristics regardless of severity of OAB symptoms. Trial Registry No. UMIN 000011980.

An evaluation of the federal adverse events reporting system data on adverse effects of 5-alpha reductase inhibitors.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the sexual, physical, and mental adverse effects associated with exposure to 5-alpha reductase inhibitors (5ARIs). METHODS: FAERS data containing finasteride and dutasteride reports were analyzed from January 2000 to April 2019. Reports identified one or more adverse effects, along with all concurrent medications. Cases of monotherapy of finasteride or dutasteride were identified. We conducted a chi-square test of independence to assess the relationship between the three drug groups and adverse event (AE) occurrence across 19 sexual, physical, and mental AE categories. The frequency procedure in SAS was utilized to summarize rates of AEs between various dosages of each drug. RESULTS: A total of 16,014 case reports were obtained. After excluding females, 7436 case reports of 5ARI monotherapy were identified: 2628 of dutasteride 0.5 mg, 3266 of finasteride 1 mg, and 744 of finasteride 5 mg. Differences in rates of AEs occurrence were statistically significant across all 19 variables (p < 0.001) with a significantly higher proportion of AEs attributed to finasteride 1 mg, with gynecomastia being the only exception. Case report submissions rose dramatically following FDA-mandated finasteride label change. CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of FAERS data suggests AEs of 5ARIs are dose-independent with greater likelihood of occurrence in younger patients, particularly in sexual and mental domains. The causality and the rate of AEs are not certain based on the FAERS data and future prospective studies are necessary to determine the true rates.

Association Between 5-Alpha Reductase Inhibitor Use and The Risk of Depression: A Meta-Analysis.

PURPOSE: To explore the association between 5α-reductase inhibitors (5ARIs) use and risk of depression based on published literature through a meta-analysis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted by searching Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CBM, CNKI, and VIP databases up to June, 2019. Summarized risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to evaluate the strength of association between 5ARIs and depression. Subgroup analyses were performed according to population, 5ARI types, degree of depression, and publication date. Registered in PROSPERO under number CRD42018096147. RESULTS: A total of 6 clinical studies with 265672 participants were included in our meta-analysis. The application of 5ARIs could significantly increase the risk of depression based on both pooled unadjusted (95% CI: 1.28-2.78, RR = 1.89, P = .001) and multivariable adjusted RRs (95% CI: 1.01-1.17, RR = 1.09, P = .03). In subgroup analyses, dutasteride was associated with depression significantly (95% CI: 1.37-1.70, RR = 1.53, P < .001), while finasteride was not. As to the degree of depression, 5ARIs mainly caused mild depression (95% CI: 1.91-2.33, RR = 2.11, P < .001), instead of moderate or severe depression. CONCLUSION: We concluded that 5ARIs could potentially increase the risk of depression. Clinicians need to carefully consider the use of 5ARIs for benign prostatic hyperplasia and androgenic alopecia patients, especially those exhibiting risk factors for depression or those who have a previous history of depression. More studies with larger sample size and comprehensive study design are needed to further verify our outcomes.

Co-administration of 5α-reductase Inhibitors Worsens the Adverse Metabolic Effects of Prescribed Glucocorticoids.

CONTEXT: Glucocorticoids (GCs) are commonly prescribed, but their use is associated with adverse metabolic effects. 5α-reductase inhibitors (5α-RI) are also frequently prescribed, mainly to inhibit testosterone conversion to dihydrotestosterone. However, they also prevent the inactivation of GCs. OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that 5α-RI may worsen the adverse effects of GCs. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized study. PATIENTS: A total of 19 healthy male volunteers (age 45 ±â€…2 years; body mass index 27.1 ±â€…0.7kg/m2). INTERVENTIONS: Participants underwent metabolic assessments; 2-step hyperinsulinemic, euglycemic clamp incorporating stable isotopes, adipose tissue microdialysis, and biopsy. Participants were then randomized to either prednisolone (10 mg daily) or prednisolone (10 mg daily) plus a 5α-RI (finasteride 5 mg daily or dutasteride 0.5 mg daily) for 7 days; metabolic assessments were then repeated. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Ra glucose, glucose utilization (M-value), glucose oxidation, and nonesterified fatty acids (NEFA) levels. RESULTS: Co-administration of prednisolone with a 5α-RI increased circulating prednisolone levels (482 ±â€…96 vs 761 ±â€…57 nmol/L, P = 0.029). Prednisolone alone did not alter Ra glucose (2.55 ±â€…0.34 vs 2.62 ±â€…0.19 mg/kg/minute, P = 0.86), M-value (3.2 ±â€…0.5 vs 2.7 ±â€…0.7 mg/kg/minute, P = 0.37), or glucose oxidation (0.042 ±â€…0.007 vs 0.040 ±â€…0.004 mmol/hr/kg/minute, P = 0.79). However, co-administration with a 5α-RI increased Ra glucose (2.67 ±â€…0.16 vs 3.05 ±â€…0.18 mg/kg/minute, P < 0.05) and decreased M-value (4.0 ±â€…0.5 vs 2.6 ±â€…0.4 mg/kg/minute, P < 0.05), and oxidation (0.043 ±â€…0.003 vs 0.036 ±â€…0.002 mmol/hr/kg, P < 0.01). Similarly, prednisolone did not impair insulin-mediated suppression of circulating NEFA (43.1 ±â€…28.9 vs 36.8 ±â€…14.3 µmol/L, P = 0.81), unless co-administered with a 5α-RI (49.8 ±â€…8.6 vs 88.5 ±â€…13.5 µmol/L, P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: We have demonstrated that 5α-RIs exacerbate the adverse effects of prednisolone. This study has significant translational implications, including the need to consider GC dose adjustments, but also the necessity for increased vigilance for the development of adverse effects.

Cerebral Venous Sinus Thrombosis Associated with Dutasteride Use.

Cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) is an uncommon cause of stroke that mainly affects young adults with known risk factors of prothrombotic conditions, pregnancy, infection, malignancy, and drugs. Dutasteride is a 5α-reductase inhibitor that is used for benign prostate hypertrophy and androgenetic alopecia. To date, CVT caused by dutasteride use has not been reported. A 25-year-old male presented with headache and diplopia. He had taken 0.5 mg of dutasteride every other day for 9 months to treat alopecia. A headache developed 7 months after he started taking medication, and horizontal diplopia occurred 1 month after the onset of headache. Fundus examination showed bilateral papilledema. Brain magnetic resonance imaging showed thrombosis in the left sigmoid and transverse sinuses. Headache and diplopia improved after discontinuing dutasteride and starting anticoagulation. The results from this case report indicated dutasteride as a potential cause of CVT. Presumably, the increased estrogen level due to dutasteride use caused the formation of a thrombus.