Percepciones estudiantiles sobre las propiedades del examen clínico objetivo estructurado en Uruguay. Disponiendo un cuestionario válido para analizar la factibilidad del nuevo formato durante la transición curricular / Student perceptions on properties of the objective structured clinical examination in Uruguay. The use of a valid questionnaire to analyse the feasibility of the new format during curriculum transition

INTRODUCCIÓN: Aunque el formato de examen clínico objetivo estructurado (ECOE) se aplica en Uruguay desde 2004 proveyendo medidas confiables de rendimiento, las percepciones sobre sus propiedades y el grado de satisfacción estudiantiles no han sido exploradas. OBJETIVO: La siguiente experiencia estuvo dirigida a evaluar la validez aparente del ECOE como aporte al estudio de su factibilidad local. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Al final del ciclo propedéutico, la subcohorte cursando en el Hospital Universitario contestó un cuestionario de 28 ítems dirigido a explorar las percepciones sobre las propiedades del ECOE en los potenciales factores «diseño» y «validez aparente». Tras analizar su confiabilidad, se depuró el formulario para proveer una herramienta más breve y fiable. RESULTADOS: El cuestionario original mostró una confiabilidad aceptable (alfa de Cronbach = 0,70), dominando las opiniones de «acuerdo/total acuerdo» sobre autenticidad de los estímulos, dinámica, pertinencia y justicia del examen. Los estudiantes percibieron obstáculos organizativos durante la prueba, manifestando desacuerdo en incluir alguna estación dirigida a evaluar solamente habilidades para la comunicación y requiriendo instancias de devolución (feedback) personalizada. La versión depurada del cuestionario original provee medidas consistentes sobre las percepciones estudiantiles y resulta una herramienta útil que podría aplicarse extensamente. Se discuten los aportes de esta experiencia al estudio de la factibilidad del nuevo formato durante la transición curricular. CONCLUSIONES: El ECOE es bien evaluado por los estudiantes al final del ciclo propedéutico, lo que apoya su validez. Deben aprovecharse sus potenciales formativos proveyendo feedback efectivo a estudiantes, tutores clínicos e institución

INTRODUCTION: Although an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) format has been applied in Uruguay since 2004, and providing reliable performance measures, perceptions of it properties and level of student satisfaction have not been determined. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the face validity of OSCE format as a contribution to its local feasibility study. MATERIAL AND METHODS: At the end of the introductory clinical course, the sub-cohort enrolled at the University Hospital responded to a 28-item questionnaire aimed at exploring perceptions about the properties of the OSCE about the potential factors 'design' and 'apparent validity'. After analysing the reliability of the original questionnaire, the questionnaire was refined in an attempt to provide a shorter and more reliable tool. RESULTS: The original questionnaire showed good internal consistency (Cronbach Alpha = 0.70), with a dominance of 'agreement/total agreement' opinions on authenticity of the stimuli, dynamic, relevance, and equity of the test. Students perceived organisational obstacles during the test, expressing disagreement to include some stations only aimed at assessing communication skills, and requiring personalised feedback sessions. The refined version of the questionnaire provides consistent measures on student perceptions and is a useful tool that can be widely applied. A discussion is presented on the contributions of this experience to a comprehensive feasibility study of the new format during curriculum transition. CONCLUSIONS: The OSCE is well evaluated by students at the end of the propaedeutic course, supporting its validity. Educational potentials of the new format should be exploited, providing effective feedback to students, clinical teachers, and institutions

Enseñanza de las bases de la ecocardioscopia en el pregrado: los estudiantes como mentores / Teaching the basics of echocardiography in the undergraduate: students as mentors

Objetivo. Analizar la capacidad de los alumnos de Medicina para integrarse en la enseñanza práctica de los planos básicos en ecocardioscopia mediante un diseño de mentoría paritaria. Metodología. Treinta y seis alumnos de Medicina previamente adiestrados en la obtención de planos en ecocardioscopia (mentores) enseñaron al resto de alumnos de 5.o curso (n=126). La metodología docente incluyó 3 etapas: teoría (curso online), entrenamiento básico (3 sesiones con 15h de experiencia práctica en ultrasonidos y un mínimo de 20 estudios ecocardiográficos por mentor) y evaluación clínica objetiva estructurada (ECOE) en la que se puntuaba la adecuación de los planos ecográficos básicos y la correcta identificación de 16 estructuras cardiacas. Resultados. La puntuación media ponderada obtenida por los alumnos en la ECOE fue de 8,66±1,98 puntos (sobre un máximo de 10). Solo 10 alumnos (8,4%) obtuvieron una puntuación inferior a 5 y 15 (12,6%) inferior a 7. Cincuenta alumnos (42%) obtuvieron 10 puntos. La estructura más fácilmente identificada fue el ventrículo izquierdo en el plano paraesternal eje corto, con un 89,9% de respuestas correctas. La estructura peor identificada fue la válvula mitral en el plano subxifoideo, con un 69,7% de respuestas correctas. Conclusiones. La enseñanza basada en la mentoría paritaria consigue un nivel de entrenamiento adecuado en la obtención de planos básicos en la ecocardioscopia. El periodo de formación es relativamente corto. El sistema de mentoría paritaria puede facilitar la implantación de la enseñanza sobre aspectos básicos en ultrasonidos a un elevado número de alumnos de pregrado (AU)

Objective. To analyse the ability of medical students to incorporate the practical teaching of basic echocardiography planes using a peer mentoring design. Methodology. Thirty-six medical students previously trained in obtaining echocardiography planes (mentors) taught the other 5th-year students (n=126). The teaching methodology included three stages: theory (online course), basic training (three 15h sessions of practical experience in ultrasound and at least 20 echocardiographic studies per mentor) and objective structured clinical assessment (OSCA), which scored the appropriateness of the basic ultrasound planes and the correct identification of 16 cardiac structures. Results. The students’ weighted mean score in the OSCA was 8.66±1.98 points (out of 10). Only 10 students (8.4%) scored less than 5, and 15 (12.6%) scored less than 7. Fifty students (42%) scored 10 points. The most easily identified structure was the left ventricle in the short-axis parasternal plane, with 89.9% of correct answers. The most poorly identified structure was the mitral valve in the subxiphoid plane, with 69.7% of correct answers. Conclusions. Peer mentoring-based teaching achieves an appropriate level of training in obtaining basic echocardiography planes. The training period is relatively short. The peer mentoring system can facilitate the implementation of teaching on basic aspects of ultrasound to a large number of undergraduate students (AU)

[Research and development of evaluation criteria for premedical curriculum].

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to develop criteria to evaluate a premedical curriculum to ultimately improve the quality of premedical education. METHODS: The first draft of the evaluation criteria was developed through a literature review and expert consultation. The Delphi survey was conducted to ensure the validity of the draft. RESULTS: The final premedical curriculum criteria consisted of three evaluation areas (curriculum development, curriculum implementation, and curriculum outcome), five evaluation items (educational objective, organization of curriculum, instructional method, class management,and educational outcome), and 18 evaluation indicators. CONCLUSION: There should be further discussion on the evaluation questionnaire and the content for each evaluation indicator with regard to its practical application. Also, a concrete evaluation system, including evaluation standards and rating scales, should be developed.

Research and development of evaluation criteria for premedical curriculum / 한국의학교육

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to develop criteria to evaluate a premedical curriculum to ultimately improve the quality of premedical education. METHODS: The first draft of the evaluation criteria was developed through a literature review and expert consultation. The Delphi survey was conducted to ensure the validity of the draft. RESULTS: The final premedical curriculum criteria consisted of three evaluation areas (curriculum development, curriculum implementation, and curriculum outcome), five evaluation items (educational objective, organization of curriculum, instructional method, class management, and educational outcome), and 18 evaluation indicators. CONCLUSION: There should be further discussion on the evaluation questionnaire and the content for each evaluation indicator with regard to its practical application. Also, a concrete evaluation system, including evaluation standards and rating scales, should be developed.

Is social sciences and humanities (SSH) premedical education marginalized in the medical school admission process? A review and contextualization of the literature.

PURPOSE: To investigate the performance outcomes of medical students with social sciences and humanities (SSH) premedical education during and beyond medical school by reviewing the literature, and to contextualize this review within today's admission milieu. METHOD: From May to July 2012, the lead author searched the PubMed, MEDLINE, and PsycINFO databases, and reference lists of relevant articles, for research that compared premedical SSH education with premedical sciences education and its influence on performance during and/or after medical school. The authors extracted representative themes and relevant empirical findings. They contextualized their findings within today's admission milieu. RESULTS: A total of 1,548 citations were identified with 20 papers included in the review. SSH premedical education is predominately an American experience. For medical students with SSH background, equivalent academic, clinical, and research performance compared with medical students with a premedical science background is reported, yet different patterns of competencies exist. Post-medical-school equivalent or improved clinical performance is associated with an SSH background. Medical students with SSH backgrounds were more likely to select primary care or psychiatry careers. SSH major/course concentration, not SSH course counts, is important for admission decision making. The impact of today's admission milieu decreases the value of an SSH premedical education. CONCLUSIONS: Medical students with SSH premedical education perform on par with peers yet may possess different patterns of competencies, research, and career interests. However, SSH premedical education likely will not attain a significant role in medical school admission processes.

Making better doctors: a survey of premedical interns working as health coaches.

We operate a decision support program in a medical center in San Francisco. In this program, postbaccalaureate, premedical interns deliver decision and communication, aids to patients. We asked whether working in this program helped these premedical interns develop key physician competencies. To measure physician competencies, we adopted the standards of the Accreditation Committee on Graduate Medical Education (ACGME), which accredits residency programs in the USA. The ACGME competencies are patient care, medical knowledge, practice-based learning, interpersonal and communication skills, professionalism, and systems-based practice. We developed a survey for our program alumni to rate themselves on a scale from 0 (none) to 100 (perfect) on each competency, before and after their time in our program. The survey also solicited free-text comments regarding each competency. In June 2012, we e-mailed all 47 alumni a link to our online survey and then analyzed responses received by July 15, 2012. We visually explored the distributions of ratings and compared medians. We selected the most specific and concrete comments from the qualitative responses. Respondents (21/47 or 45%) reported that their participation in Decision Services increased their competencies across the board. Qualitative comments suggest that this is because students accompanied patients on their clinic journeys (seeing multiple facets of the systems of care) while also actively facilitating patient physician communication. Providing decision support can improve self-ratings of crucial physician competencies. Educators should consider deploying premedical and medical students as decision support coaches to increase competencies through experiential learning.

The influence of pre-admission tracks on students' academic performance in a medical programme: Universiti Sains Malaysia.

CONTEXT: An aim of medical schools is to select the most suitable candidates who are more likely to become good doctors, fulfilling societal expectations. It is imperative to better understand the influence of 'selection' variables on students' academic performance. We conducted a retrospective record review (3R) to examine the predictive power of pre-admission tracks on academic performance in the medical programme at the Universiti Sains Malaysia. METHODS: Data were collected on medical graduates' of the university for the years 2003 through 2007. This represented 805 graduates after exclusion of 42 for incomplete and inconsistent data related to the analysis. RESULTS: A total of 95% of the graduates were included in this analysis; 67% were female. Of the 805 graduates, 75% were from the Matriculation course track, 22% from the High School Certificate (HSC) course and 1% from other pre-admission tracks. There was 2% missing information. The majority (79%) were Biology majors and 13% were Physics majors. Graduates from the HSC course and with a Biology background demonstrated a strong correlation with positive academic performance (P < 0.05) compared with other groups. CONCLUSION: The HSC track and Biology background may be helpful for the medical school in selecting future students.

Challenging traditional premedical requirements as predictors of success in medical school: the Mount Sinai School of Medicine Humanities and Medicine Program.

PURPOSE: Students compete aggressively as they prepare for the MCAT and fulfill traditional premedical requirements that have uncertain educational value for medical and scientific careers and limit the scope of their liberal arts and biomedical education. This study assessed the medical school performance of humanities and social science majors who omitted organic chemistry, physics, and calculus, and did not take the MCAT. METHOD: The authors compared and contrasted the academic outcomes of 85 Humanities and Medicine Program (HuMed) students at Mount Sinai School of Medicine with those of their 606 traditionally prepared classmates for the 2004-2009 graduating classes. The authors analyzed basic science knowledge, clerkship performance, humanism, leadership, community service, research fellowships, distinctions, and honors. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in clerkship honors other than psychiatry (HuMed students outperformed their peers, P < .0001) or in commencement distinctions or honors. Although HuMed students were significantly more likely to secure a scholarly-year mentored project (P = .001), there was no difference in graduating with distinction in research (P = .281). HuMed students were more likely to have lower United States Medical Licensing Examination Step 1 scores (221 +/- 20 versus 227 +/- 19, P = .0039) and to take a nonscholarly leave of absence (P = .0001). There was a trend among HuMed students toward residencies in primary care and psychiatry and away from surgical subspecialties and anesthesiology. CONCLUSIONS: Students without the traditional premedical preparation performed at a level equivalent to their premedical classmates.

Flexner revisited: the role and value of the basic sciences in medical education.

A central tenet of Flexner's report was the fundamental role of science in medical education. Today, there is tension between the time needed to teach an ever-expanding knowledge base in science and the time needed for increased instruction in clinical application and in the behavioral, ethical, and managerial knowledge and skills needed to prepare for clinical experiences. One result has been at least a perceived reduction in time and focus on the foundational sciences. In this context, the International Association of Medical Science Educators initiated a study to address the role and value of the basic sciences in medical education by seeking perspectives from various groups of medical educators to five questions: (1) What are the sciences that constitute the foundation for medical practice? (2) What is the value and role of the foundational sciences in medical education? (3) When and how should these foundational sciences be incorporated into the medical education curriculum? (4) What sciences should be prerequisite to entering the undergraduate medical curriculum? (5) What are examples of the best practices for incorporating the foundational sciences into the medical education curriculum? The results suggest a broad group of experts believes that an understanding of basic science content remains essential to clinical practice and that teaching should be accomplished across the entire undergraduate medical education experience and integrated with clinical applications. Learning the sciences also plays a foundational role in developing discipline and rigor in learners' thinking skills, including logical reasoning, critical appraisal, problem solving, decision making, and creativity.

Standardizing and personalizing science in medical education.

In the century since the initial publication of the Flexner Report, medical education has emphasized a broad knowledge of science and a fundamental understanding of the scientific method, which medical educators believe are essential to the practice of medicine. The enormous growth of scientific knowledge that underlies clinical practice has challenged medical schools to accommodate this new information within the curricula. Although innovative educational modalities and new curricula have partly addressed this growth, the authors argue for a systematic restructuring of the content and structure of science education from the premedical setting through clinical practice. The overarching goal of science education is to provide students with a broad, solid foundation applicable to medicine, a deep understanding of the scientific method, and the attitudes and skills needed to apply new knowledge to patient care throughout their careers. The authors believe that to accomplish this successfully, the following changes must occur across the three major stages of medical education: (1) a reshaping of the scientific preparation that all students complete before medical school, (2) an increase in individualized science education during medical school, and (3) an emphasis on knowledge acquisition skills throughout graduate medical education and beyond to assure lifelong scientific learning. As students progress through the educational continuum, the balance of standardized and personalized scientific knowledge will shift toward personalization. Greater personalization demands that physicians possess well-refined skills in information acquisition, interpretation, and application for optimal lifelong learning and effective clinical practice.

Patient-based cultural competency curriculum for pre-health professionals.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The diverse US population requires medical cultural competency education for health providers throughout their pre-professional and professional years. We present a curriculum to train pre-health professional undergraduates by combining classroom education in the humanities and cross-cultural communication skills with volunteer clinical experiences at the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) hospital. METHODS: The course was open to a maximum of 15 UCLA junior and senior undergraduate students with a pre-health or humanities major and was held in the spring quarters of 2002--2004. The change in students' knowledge of cultural competency was evaluated using the Provider's Guide to Quality and Culture Quiz (QCQ) and through students' written assignments and evaluations. RESULTS: Trainees displayed a statistically significant improvement in scores on the QCQ. Participants' written assignments and subjective evaluations confirmed an improvement in awareness and a high motivation to continue learning at the graduate level. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first evaluated undergraduate curriculum that integrates interdisciplinary cultural competency training with patient volunteering in the medical field. The didactic, volunteering, and writing components of the course comprise a broadly applicable tool for training future health care providers at other institutions.

Effectiveness of a premedical postbaccalaureate program in improving medical college admission test scores of underrepresented minority and disadvantaged students.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this article is to share the procedures used to strengthen the Medical Pathways (MEDPATH) premedical postbaccalaureate program (PBP) to increase the chances of its students successfully graduating from medical school in four years. METHODS: Subjects included students who matriculated into medical school between 1991-1999 (N = 72) following successful completion of the 12-month MEDPATH premedical PBP. Students who had passed the USMLE Step 1 on the first attempt were defined as successful and were compared to those who did not pass on their first attempt. Programmatic changes were implemented based on these findings, and outcomes were evaluated. RESULTS: There was a significant improvement in total MCAT scores between pre-2003 (PBP entry year) participants (Mn = 20.73, SD = 3.10, N = 117) and post-2003 (PBP entry year) participants (Mn = 25.27, SD = 2.96, N = 37) (t = 7.86, df = 152, p < 0.001). MEDPATH premedical PBP coursework grade-point averages improved from 3.48 to 3.67 over the same time intervals. Diversity of program participants was maintained. CONCLUSION: The enhanced MEDPATH premedical PBP appears to be producing underrepresented minority and disadvantaged medical students who are better prepared to succeed in medical school.