Defecation-Specific Behavior in Children with Functional Defecation Issues: A Systematic Review.

CONTEXT: Atypical defecation habits are common and distressing for children and families and can have a major impact on quality of life. Often, no underlying factor can be identified, and the defecation disorder is considered functional. Current interventions are not successful for up to 50% of children. We suggest this high failure rate may be caused by lack of consistency in descriptors of behavioral indicators for functional defecation problems. Most investigations and descriptors focus on general behavior. There are fewer reports concerning defecation-specific behaviors. OBJECTIVE: To develop a thorough inventory of defecation-specific behaviors, providing a more informed foundation for assessment and intervention. DESIGN: A systematic review of six common databases was performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses recommendations. Reference lists of retained articles were screened for additional studies. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Content analysis was used to classify defecation-specific behaviors into 17 categories. RESULTS: Our search yielded 2677 articles; 98 peer-reviewed publications were retained for full-text review, and 67 articles were included in the final qualitative synthesis. Although there is inconsistency in reported diagnostic criteria, stool withholding and manifesting pain on defecation are the most commonly reported defecation-specific behaviors. In the studies that included children with autism or attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, the defecation-specific behaviors were not unique to the diagnostic group. CONCLUSION: Consistent use of established diagnostic criteria, along with use of behaviors identified through this review, lay a foundation for more effective interventions.

Effect of Octreotide on Colonic Motility in Pediatric Patients With Chronic Recalcitrant Constipation.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to study the effect of octreotide on colonic motility in pediatric patients with recalcitrant chronic constipation/encopresis and other suspected colonic motility disorders. METHODS: This was a nonrandomized, single-center, open-label, prospective study evaluating the effect of a single subcutaneous dose of octreotide on colonic motility. RESULTS: Thirteen patients (5 boys) were enrolled in the study. The age range was 4.6 to 16.2 years. Eleven patients (84%) had normal colonic manometry and 2 patients (16%) had colonic neuropathy. Motility Index (MI) (mmHg) for the 15 minutes before and after octreotide infusion was 6.03 ±â€Š1.26 (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.35-6.72) and 5.32 ±â€Š1.66 (95% CI 4.42-6.23), respectively, with P value of 0.08. MI for the 30 minutes before and after octreotide infusion was 6.89 ±â€Š1.37 (95% CI 6.14-7.64) and 6.71 ±â€Š1.47 (95% CI 5.91-7.52), respectively, with P value of 0.55. MI for the 45 minutes before and after octreotide infusion was 7.73 ±â€Š1.32 (95% CI 7.01-8.45) and 7.53 ±â€Š1.38 (95% CI 6.78-8.28), respectively, with P value of 0.8. CONCLUSION: Our study showed that the administration of octreotide resulted in no significant changes in colonic MI in pediatric patients with chronic recalcitrant constipation.

Comparison of familial and psychological factors in groups of encopresis patients with constipation and without constipation.

The study aimed to evaluate the differences between groups of encopresis patients with constipation and without constipation. The Symptom Checklist- 90-Revised, the COPE Questionnaire, the Relationship Scales Questionnaire, the McMaster Family Assessment Device and the Parenting Style Scale were used to evaluate, respectively, maternal psychiatric symptoms, coping abilities, attachment style, family functioning and children's perceptions of parenting behaviors. Psychiatric diagnoses were evaluated using the K-SADS. A higher level of maternal psychiatric symptoms, impaired role and affective involvement functioning of the family and less psychological autonomy were observed in the group of encopresis patients with constipation than in the group of encopresis patients without constipation. No significant differences were found between the groups in psychiatric comorbidities, maternal coping abilities and attachment style. The two groups had a similar pattern of comorbid psychiatric disorders and maternal psychological factors, although some familial factors-related mainly to parental authority-were differentiated in the encopresis with constipation group.

Dysfunctional elimination syndromes--how closely linked are constipation and encopresis with specific lower urinary tract conditions?

PURPOSE: It is recognized that there is a strong association between bladder and bowel dysfunction. We determined the association of constipation and/or encopresis with specific lower urinary tract conditions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed our database of children with lower urinary tract dysfunction and divided cases into 3 categories of bowel dysfunction (constipation, encopresis and constipation plus encopresis) and 4 lower urinary tract conditions (dysfunctional voiding, idiopathic detrusor overactivity disorder, detrusor underutilization disorder and primary bladder neck dysfunction). Associations between bowel dysfunction types and each lower urinary tract condition were determined. RESULTS: Of 163 males and 205 females with a mean age of 8.5 years constipation was the most common bowel dysfunction (27%). Although encopresis is generally thought to reflect underlying constipation, only half of children with encopresis in this series had constipation. Dysfunctional voiding was associated with the highest incidence of bowel dysfunction. All but 1 patient with encopresis had associated urgency and detrusor overactivity, and the encopresis resolved in 75% of patients after initiation of anticholinergic therapy. Constipation was significantly more common in girls (27%) than in boys (11%, p <0.01), while encopresis was more common in boys (9%) than in girls (3%, p = 0.02), likely reflecting the higher incidence of dysfunctional voiding in girls and idiopathic detrusor overactivity disorder in boys. CONCLUSIONS: Active bowel dysfunction was seen in half of the children with a lower urinary tract condition. Constipation was more common in patients with dysfunctional voiding, while encopresis was significantly increased in those with idiopathic detrusor overactivity disorder and in those with dysfunctional voiding, severe urgency and detrusor overactivity. Anticholinergics, despite their constipating effect, given for treatment of detrusor overactivity resolved encopresis in most children with this bowel dysfunction.

¿Qué esconden los problemas del control de esfínteres? A propósito de un caso / Hiding problems sphincters management: report of a case

Los trastornos del control de esfínteres son uno de los problemas más comunes en la consulta del pediatra de Atención Primaria. Se expone un caso clínico de un niño de cuatro años que presenta encopresis funcional por rechazo a utilizar el inodoro, así como la intervención llevada a cabo en conjunto por Pediatría y Psicología Clínica. La exposición de este caso muestra cómo la misma manifestación puede esconder distintos problemas que requerirán diferentes abordajes terapéuticos. Asimismo, se pone de manifiesto la necesidad de prestar atención a los diversos contextos que rodean al niño (familia, escuela, profesionales), así como valorar la interacción y la influencia mutua de los síntomas de este con la actitud de los padres y con otros factores externos para entender y abordar el problema de forma más precisa y global (AU)

Toilet training disorders are commonly treated problems in Primary Health Care Pediatrician practice. A case study of a four year-old boy with functional encopresis and stool toileting refusal is presented; the interdisciplinary intervention conducted by specialized Pediatrics and Clinical Psychology is also discussed. This clinical case presentation shows that the same symptoms may underlie different problems which would require different therapeutic interventions. The need to pay attention to the contexts surrounding the child (family, school, professionals) is also highlighted; as well as assessing the interaction and reciprocal influence between the child’s symptoms, the parents’ attitudes and other external factors, in order to understand and approach to the problem in a more comprehensive way (AU)

Central nervous system processing of emotions in children with faecal incontinence.

AIM: Faecal incontinence (FI) is a common disorder involving both the enteric (ENS) and central nervous systems (CNS). The aim of the study is to analyze neurophysiologically the central processing of emotions in children with FI, healthy controls and children with Attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). METHODS: Fourteen children with FI and constipation, nine with non-retentive FI, 15 controls and 13 children with ADHD were examined. The methods included a physical exam, sonography, Child Behavior Checklist, a psychiatric interview and intelligence test. Acoustic evoked potentials were recorded according to standardized methodology. For the event-related potentials, 80 neutral, 40 positive and 40 negative pictures from the International Affective Picture System (IAPS), and 40 pictures depicting faeces were presented. RESULTS: Children with FI had significantly more intense responses for most stimuli over the frontal, central and parietal regions compared to controls. Stool pictures did not evoke stronger responses than other stimuli. Children with constipation elicited stronger responses. Children with ADHD did not differ from controls. Acoustic evoked potentials were comparable in all groups. CONCLUSIONS: Children with FI have increased responses in the processing of emotions. These can be interpreted as a neurobiological vulnerability, possibly due to the association of the ENS and CNS.

Integrative approaches to childhood constipation and encopresis.

Constipation and encopresis (fecal soiling) are common childhood disorders that may lead to significant functional impairment. The etiology and course of constipation and encopresis are increasingly conceptualized from a broad biopsychosocial perspective, and therefore a holistic approach to assessment and treatment is indicated. Many children experience symptoms of chronic constipation and/or encopresis that are only partially responsive to conventional medical therapy. Complementary/alternative therapies can often help in the treatment of constipation/encopresis and are well accepted by patients and families.

Assessment of the effectiveness of biofeedback in children with dyssynergic defecation and recalcitrant constipation/encopresis: does home biofeedback improve long-term outcomes.

The purpose of this study was to determine whether biofeedback benefits children with dyssynergic defecation and constipation/encopresis, and whether home biofeedback improves long-term outcomes. Thirty-six patients with chronic constipation who had failed at least 6 months of conventional treatment and demonstrated dyssynergic defecation at anorectal manometry were randomized to biofeedback in the laboratory alone (group 1, n=24) or in the laboratory and at home (group 2, n=12) and followed up at 2, 4, and a mean of 44 months. Thirty patients were available for long-term follow-up. Bowel movements increased in all from a mean of 1.4/week to 5.1, 5.8, and 5.1 per week at 2 months, 4 months, and long-term, respectively (p < or = 0.001). Soiling decreased in all from a mean of 5.5/week to 0.6, 0.1, and 1 per week at 2 months, 4 months, and long-term, respectively (p < or = 0.001). Laxative use decreased from a mean of 4.1 days/week to 0.6, 0.3, and 0.7 per week at 2 months, 4 months, and long-term, respectively (p < or = 0.001). Twenty-seven of 30 parents ranked their satisfaction a mean of 2.2 (range 1-excellent to 3-good). There were no significant differences in outcomes between the laboratory alone group and the laboratory plus home group. Biofeedback is beneficial for some children with chronic constipation and dyssynergic defecation. Supplemental home biofeedback does not improve long-term outcomes.

Prognosis of constipation: clinical factors and colonic transit time.

BACKGROUND: Measurement of colonic transit time (CTT) is sometimes used in the evaluation of patients with chronic constipation. AIM: To investigate the relation between symptoms and CTT, and to assess the importance of symptoms and CTT in predicting outcome. METHODS: Between 1995 and 2000, 169 consecutive patients (median age 8.4 years, 65% boys) fulfilling the criteria for constipation were enrolled. During the intervention and follow up period, all kept a diary to record symptoms. CTT was measured at entry to the study. RESULTS: At entry, defecation frequency was lower in girls than in boys, while the frequency of encopresis episodes was higher in boys. CTT values were significantly higher in those with a low defecation frequency (< or =1/week) and a high frequency of encopresis (> or =2/day). However, 50% had CTT values within the normal range. Successful outcome occurred more often in those with a rectal impaction. CTT results <100 hours were not predictive of outcome. However, those with CTT >100 hours were less likely to have had a successful outcome. CONCLUSION: The presence of a rectal impaction at presentation is associated with a better outcome at one year. A CTT >100 hours is associated with a poor outcome at one year.

Nurse management of intractable functional constipation: a randomised controlled trial.

AIMS: To evaluate the effectiveness of a nurse led clinic (NLC) compared with a consultant led paediatric gastroenterology clinic (PGC) in the management of chronic constipation. METHODS: Children (age 1-15 years) with functional constipation were randomised following a detailed medical assessment to follow up in either the NLC or PGC. An escalating algorithm of treatment was used as the basis of management in both the NLC and PGC. Main outcome measures were: time to cure at last visit or later confirmed by telephone; time to cure at last visit; and time to prematurely leaving the study. RESULTS: A total of 102 children were recruited, of whom 52 were randomly assigned to NLC and 50 to PGC. Outcome assessment showed that 34 children in the NLC and 25 children in the PGC were confirmed cured at their last visit or later confirmed by telephone. The median time to cure was 18.0 months in the NLC and 23.2 months in the PGC. The probability of being cured was estimated as 33% higher in the NLC compared to PGC (hazard ratio 1.33). Attending the NLC hastened time to cure by an estimated 18.4%. CONCLUSION: Children who attend an NLC are equally as, if not more likely to be cured of intractable constipation, than those attending a PGC and on average their cure will occur sooner. Results suggest that an NLC can significantly improve follow up for children with intractable constipation and highlight the important role for clinic nurse specialists in management of children with gastrointestinal disease.

[Utility of anorectal manometry in the diagnosis and treatment of encopresis]. / Utilidad de la manometría anorrectal para el diagnóstico y tratamiento de la encopresis.

BACKGROUND: Biofeedback based on anomanometric techniques has been shown to be effective in the treatment of children with encopresis. The long-term efficacy of biofeedback and which variables of anorectal manometry (anorectal manometry) could help to establish biofeedback indications are currently the subject of debate. OBJECTIVES: To identify which variables of anorectal manometry, in addition to symptoms, could be useful in deciding which patients could benefit from biofeedback therapy and to assess the outcome of this treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Anorectal manometry was performed in 88 patients, who were referred to our service complaining of soiling at least once a month for a minimum of 6 months after a period of normal continence of 1 year or more. The chronological and mental age of the patients was 4 years. All patients were otherwise in good health and had shown no response to medical treatment. The following variables were studied: anal canal profile, rectoanal inhibitory reflex (RAIR), continence reflex, rectal sensitivity, external anal sphincter (EAS) activity and defecatory maneuver. The patients were divided into two groups, according to clinical and anomanometric impairment, and the most affected patients (n = 41) underwent biofeedback therapy. The indications and outcome of biofeedback were assessed through clinical course and anorectal manometry. In the statistical analysis, the mean and standard deviation were calculated. The chi-squared test with Yates' correction was used to compare clinical and manometric qualitative parameters; Student's t-test was used to compare quantitative parameters; nonparametric tests consisted of the Mann-Whitney test and the Wilcoxon test was used for paired data. RESULTS: Patients treated with biofeedback therapy presented shorter anal canal, greater pressure in the rectal ampulla (P < 0.001), decreased pressure in the anal canal (P < 0.05), lesser distension of the EAS on provoking RAIR, lower presence of the continence reflex (P < 0.01), lower rectal sensitivity, and a worse response of the striated sphincteric muscle and of the defecatory maneuver (P < 0.001). Seventy-eight percent of the patients had a good response to biofeedback therapy. Pressure in the anal canal and rectal sensitivity improved (P < 0.001) with normality on straining in 11 out of 15 patients. These good results persisted in a long-term follow-up of 10 patients. Eight of 10 patients who did not undergo biofeedback therapy showed persistent encopresis (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Anorectal manometry detected disturbances, chiefly in the activity of the EAS, which are useful in indicating biofeedback therapy in children with secondary encopresis. Biofeedback therapy seems to produce favorable long-term results in the majority of the most severely affected patients.

Colonic transit times and behaviour profiles in children with defecation disorders.

AIMS: To evaluate children referred for defecation disorders using the child behavioural checklist (CBCL). METHODS: A total of 215 patients were divided into three groups: 135 (5-14 years of age) with paediatric constipation (PC), 56 (5-17 years) with functional non-retentive faecal soiling (FNRFS), and 24 (5-16 years) with recurrent abdominal pain (RAP). Behavioural scores were correlated with colonic transit time (CTT) and anorectal function parameters (manometry and EMG). RESULTS: No significant differences in the mean CBCL scores were found among the three patient groups. However, children with PC and FNRFS had significantly more behavioural problems than the Dutch normative sample, while children with RAP had scores within the normal range. No significant differences were found between CTT in the patient groups, with respect to the CBCL. Similarly, no significant difference existed between children able or unable to relax their pelvic floor muscles during defecation attempts and their behaviour profiles. CONCLUSION: There seems to be no relation between colonic/anorectal function and specific behavioural profiles. On the other hand, children with defecation disorders show more behavioural problems than do controls.

Encopresis.

A careful history and physical examination will help to differentiate between encopresis with or without constipation and fecal incontinence caused by anatomic or organic disease. Most children with encopresis with or without functional constipation require no or minimal laboratory workup. Successful treatment of encopresis requires a combination of parent and child education, behavioral intervention, medical therapy, and long-term compliance with the treatment regimen. The conventional treatment approach consists of behavior modification and laxative for children with encopresis with constipation and behavior modification alone for the few children with encopresis without constipation. Almost every patient will experience dramatic improvement in encopresis. Recovery rates are 30% to 50% after 1 year and 48% to 75% after 5 years.

The effect of anorectal manometry on the outcome of treatment in severe childhood constipation: a randomized, controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: Approximately 50% of constipated children contract rather than relax the external sphincter complex during a defecation attempt. Although biofeedback training (BF) is able to change this defecation behavior, there is no additional effect of BF to conventional treatment (CT) on clinical outcome compared with CT alone. It has been postulated that the absence of a significant difference between these 2 treatment options might be because of a therapeutic, "demystifying" effect of performing anorectal manometry in conventionally treated children, necessary to obtain basal manometric data. The objective of this prospective, controlled, randomized study was to evaluate the effect of CT with 2 anorectal manometry sessions compared with CT alone (dietary advice, diary, toilet training, oral laxatives, and enemas) on clinical outcome. METHODS: A total of 212 constipated children (143 boys) who were visiting a referral pediatric gastroenterologic practice were randomized prospectively to CT alone (115 patients) or to CT combined with 2 manometry sessions (CTM; 97 patients). Patients were included in the study when they fulfilled at least 2 of the 4 following criteria: stool frequency fewer than 3 per week, 2 or more soiling and/or encopresis episodes per week, periodic passage of very large amounts of stool every 7 to 30 days, or a palpable rectal or abdominal fecal mass. CT comprises dietary advice, a daily diary, toilet training, and oral laxative treatment preceded by rectal disimpaction with enemas on 3 consecutive days. During both manometries, the child and the parent could watch the tracing on the computer screen. No explanation was given to either the child or the parents during the procedure. When the procedure was finished, the tracings were clarified. Successful treatment was defined as a defecation frequency of 3 or more per week and fewer than 1 soiling/encopresis episode per 2 weeks and no use of laxatives. RESULTS: Only 4 and 2 children from the CT and CTM groups showed no soiling and/or encopresis, whereas 76% and 65%, respectively, reported the periodic passage of large stools. In 26% and 30% of the patients, a rectal scybalum was found on physical examination. The success rates at 6, 26, 52, and 104 weeks' follow-up were 4%, 24%, 32%, and 43% and 7%, 22%, 30%, and 35% in the CT and CTM group, respectively. No significant difference in success percentage was observed between the 2 groups at any time of follow-up with relative risks (CT/CTM) and 95% confidence intervals, respectively, of 0.55 (0.16-1.89), 1.13 (0.67-1.89), 1.07 (0.69-1.65), and 1.23 (0.81-1.85). A significant increase in defecation frequency was observed between the first (intake) and second visits, which was sustained at all subsequent visits and stages of follow-up in both groups (not significant). Also in relation to the first visit, a significant decrease in encopresis episodes was shown and a further slow but significant decrease at 52 weeks of follow-up in both groups. The manometric data obtained from the CTM group showed a low percentage of children with normal defecation dynamics, namely 28%, which (significantly) increased to 38% at the last manometry. CONCLUSIONS: Anorectal manometry combined with CT compared with CT alone did not result in higher success rates in chronically constipated children. Therefore, anorectal manometry has no additional demystifying or educational effect on clinical outcome in chronically constipated children. This observation together with the observation in the current and previous studies that no correlation was found between (achievement of) normal defecation dynamics and success and that no relation was observed between volume of urge or critical volume and success leaves no diagnostic or therapeutic role for anorectal manometry in chronic constipated children, except its use as a diagnostic test to exclude Hirschsprung's disease. A simple CT is successful in 30% of severely constipated children who are referred to a tertiary hospital, underscoring the importance of long-lasting and adequate laxative treatment.

Lack of benefit of laxatives as adjunctive therapy for functional nonretentive fecal soiling in children.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether the combination of laxative treatment and biofeedback therapy (BF) is more effective for management of functional nonretentive fecal soiling than biofeedback therapy alone. STUDY DESIGN: In a prospective nonblinded study, 48 children were randomized in 2 groups: treatment with oral laxatives (LAX) and 5 sessions of BF (BF + LAX) or 5 sessions of BF alone (BF) during a treatment intervention period of 7 weeks. Biofeedback was performed with perfused manometry catheters and rectal balloon distension. Training focused on awareness of balloon distension and instruction in correct defecation dynamics. Successful treatment was defined as <1 encopresis episode per 2 weeks. RESULTS: At the end of the intervention period, the number of encopresis episodes was significantly decreased in both groups: from 7 (2 to 24) to 2 (0 to 17) in the BF group and from 7 (3 to 25) to 2 (0 to 14) in the BF + LAX group. However, children given BF alone had significantly higher success rates than children treated with BF and additional oral laxatives (44% to 11%). CONCLUSIONS: There is no additional effect of laxative treatment in functional nonretentive fecal soiling. Children treated with BF in combination with laxatives showed a significantly lower success percentage compared with those treated with BF alone. These results suggest that children with functional nonretentive fecal soiling should be treated differently from children with constipation and encopresis.

Randomised controlled trial of biofeedback training in persistent encopresis with anismus.

BACKGROUND: Paradoxical external anal sphincter contraction during attempted defecation (anismus) is thought to be an important contributor to chronic faecal retention and encopresis in children. Biofeedback training can be used to teach children to abolish this abnormal contraction. METHODS: A randomised controlled trial in medical treatment resistant and/or treatment dependent children with anismus using surface electromyographic (EMG) biofeedback training to determine whether such training produces sustained faecal continence. Up to four sessions of biofeedback training were conducted at weekly intervals for each patient. Anorectal manometry was performed before randomisation and six months later. Parents of patients completed the "child behaviour checklist" (CBCL) before randomisation and at follow up. RESULTS: Sixty eight children underwent anorectal manometry and EMG. Of these, 29 had anismus (ages 4-14 years) and were randomised to either EMG biofeedback training and conventional medical treatment (BFT) (n = 14) or to conventional medical treatment alone (n = 15). All but one child were able to learn relaxation of the external anal sphincter on attempted defecation. At six months' follow up, laxative free remission had been sustained in two of 14 patients in the BFT group and in two of 15 controls (95% confidence interval (CI) on difference, -24% to 26%). Remission or improvement occurred in four of 14 patients in the BFT group and six of 15 controls (95% CI on difference, -46% to 23%). Of subjects available for repeat anorectal manometry and EMG at six months, six of 13 in the BFT group still demonstrated anismus v 11 of 13 controls (95% CI on difference, -75% to -1%). Of the four patients in full remission at six months, only one (in the BFT group) did not exhibit anismus. Rectal hyposensitivity was not associated with remission or improvement in either of the groups. Mean CBCL total behaviour problem scores were not significantly different between the BFT and control groups, but there was a significant improvement in CBCL school scale scores in the BFT group, and this improvement was significantly greater than that seen in the control group. CONCLUSIONS: The result of this study, together with those reported in other controlled trials, argues against using biofeedback training in children with encopresis.