Hidrocortisona reduz as concentrações séricas dos biomarcadores inflamatórios séricos em pacientes submetidos a endarterectomia de carótida / Hydrocortisone reduces serum concentrations of inflammatory biomarkers in patients subjected to carotid endarterectomy

A hidrocortisona pode reduzir a concentração dos biomarcadores inflamatórios séricos e teciduais.ObjetivoAnalisar a atividade inflamatória da proteína C-reativa ultrassensível (PCR-US), do fator de necrose tumoral (FNT)-alfa e do fator de crescimento do endotélio vascular (FCEV) séricos e teciduais, mediante administração intraoperatória de hidrocortisona, após endarterectomia de artéria carótida (EAC).MétodoVinte e dois pacientes foram divididos em Grupo Controle (5 assintomáticos e 6 sintomáticos) – não foi administrada hidrocortisona – e Grupo 1 (4 assintomáticos e 7 sintomáticos) – foram administrados 500 mg intravenoso de hidrocortisona. O PCR-US, o FNT-alfa e o FCEV séricos foram dosados no pré-operatório e em 1 hora, 6 horas e 24 horas após a EAC. Na placa carotídea, mensuramos os níveis de FNT-alfa e FCEV.ResultadosO grupo 1 exibiu menor concentração sérica de FNT-alfa em 1 hora (p=0,031), 6 horas (p=0,015) e 24 horas (p=0,017) após a EAC, e menor concentração de FCEV em 1 hora (p=0,006) e 6 horas (p=0,005) após a EAC, em relação ao grupo controle. Os pacientes sintomáticos do grupo 1 exibiram menor concentração de FNT-alfa em 1 hora e 6 horas após a EAC, e menor concentração de FCEV em 1 hora após a EAC, em relação ao grupo controle. Não houve diferença estatística entre as concentrações teciduais de FNT-alfa e FCEV entre o grupo controle e o grupo 1.ConclusãoA hidrocortisona reduz as concentrações séricas pós-operatórias de FNT-alfa e FCEV, em especial nos sintomáticos; porém, não reduz os níveis teciduais destes biomarcadores.

Hydrocortisone may reduce serum and tissue concentrations of inflammatory biomarkers.ObjectiveTo analyze the inflammatory activity of serum and tissue high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP), tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-á and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) after intraoperative administration of hydrocortisone, after carotid endarterectomy (CEA).MethodTwenty-two patients were allocated to a Control Group (5 asymptomatic and 6 symptomatic patients) and were not administered hydrocortisone or to Group 1 (4 asymptomatic and 7 symptomatic patients) and were administered 500 mg intravenous hydrocortisone. Serum levels of hsCRP, TNF-á and VEGF were tested for the preoperative period and at 1 hour, 6 hours and 24 hours after CEA. Levels of TNF-á and VEGF were also measured in carotid plaques.ResultsGroup 1 exhibited lower concentrations of serum TNF-á at 1 hour (p=0.031), 6 hours (p=0.015) and 24 hours (p=0.017) after CEA and lower concentrations of serum VEGF at 1 hour (p=0.006) and 6 hours (p=0.005) after CEA, relative to controls. Symptomatic patients in group 1 exhibited lower concentrations than controls for serum TNF-á at 1 hour and 6 hours after CEA and lower concentrations than controls for serum VEGF at 1 hour after CEA. There were no statistical differences in tissue concentrations of TNF-á or VEGF between the control group and group 1.ConclusionHydrocortisone reduces postoperative concentrations of serum TNF-á and VEGF, especially in symptomatic patients; but does not reduce tissue levels of these biomarkers.

The impact of carotid revascularization on cognitive function / O impacto da revascularização carotídea sobre a função cognitiva

The concept that carotid disease may compromise cognitive function was initially proposed by Fisher in 1951, based on an autopsy case. However, some topics involving cognitive function remain controversial, such as its correlation with carotid obstructive disease. So, the authors of this review evaluate the impact of carotid revascularization on cognitive function and the repercussions of the revascularization technique (carotid stenting vs. endarterectomy) chosen. It was clear from the literature reviewed that carotid stenosis is related to a decline in cognitive function over time. However, controversy still remains over the impact of carotid revascularization on cognitive function. With elation to the technique employed (carotid stenting vs. endarterectomy), the majority of studies found no difference between the two techniques in terms of overall cognitive outcome...

A noção de que a doença carotídea pode comprometer a função cognitiva foi proposta inicialmente por Fisher, em 1951, baseado em um caso de necropsia. Porém, alguns tópicos envolvendo a função cognitiva permanecem controversos, tais como sua correlação com a doença obstrutiva da carótida. Nesse sentido, os autores desta revisão buscam avaliar o impacto da revascularização carotídea e a repercussão da técnica de revascularização empregada (endarterectomia versus angioplastia carotídea) sobre a função cognitiva. A partir da literatura levantada, ficou claro que as estenoses carotídeas estão relacionadas com o declínio cognitivo ao longo do tempo, mas ainda há controvérsia no que se refere ao impacto da revascularização carotídea sobre a função cognitiva. Quanto à técnica empregada (angioplastia versus endarterectomia carotídeas), a maioria dos estudos não demonstrou distinção entre as duas técnicas quanto ao desfecho cognitivo geral...

Improvement and impairment in cognitive function after carotid endarterectomy: comparison of objective and subjective assessments.

Objective and subjective assessments of postoperative improvement and impairment in cognition were prospectively compared in patients who underwent carotid endarterectomy (CEA). Each patient underwent subjective cognitive assessment by a neurosurgeon and the patient's next of kin, and neuropsychological testing consisting of five test scores within 7 days before surgery and between 1 and 2 months after surgery. Of 213 patients studied, 24 (11%), 166 (78%), and 23 (11%) patients were defined as having subjectively improved, unchanged, and impaired cognition, respectively, following surgery. In all neuropsychological tests, differences in test scores between the two tests (postoperative test score - preoperative test score) significantly differentiated patients with subjectively improved, unchanged, and impaired cognition after surgery. Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that the cut-off point for the differences in neuropsychological test scores in detecting subjective improvement and impairment in cognition after surgery was identical to mean +2 standard deviations (SDs) and mean -2 SDs, respectively, of the control value obtained from normal subjects. Of 27 patients with differences in neuropsychological test scores more than the upper cut-off point and 26 patients with differences in neuropsychological test scores less than the lower cut-off point in one or more neuropsychological tests, 24 (89%) and 23 (88%) exhibited subjectively improved and impaired cognition, respectively, after surgery. The present study indicates that neuropsychological test scores reflect the subjective assessment of postoperative change in cognition, and can detect subjective improvement and impairment in cognition after CEA using the optimal cut-off points for the test scores.

[Dynamics of the recovery of disturbed functions in patients with stroke after carotid endarterectomy].

The recovery of disturbed functions was followed up for 1 year after ischemic stroke in 85 patients with atherosclerotic stenosis of internal carotid arteries. Fifty patients underwent carotid endarterectomy and 35 patients refused surgery. Somatic signs, neurological status measured with the NIH-NINDS, functional state (Barthel index), quality of life and neuropsychological status were assessed. The Doppler ultrasound of precerebral arteries and neurovisualization were performed. The significant positive changes, including the reduction of focal neurological deficit, the improvement of cognitive functions and quality of life, the normalization of functional state, were noted after the carotid endarterectomy. In patients who refused surgery, these parameters did not change significantly compared to baseline. The number of the recorded ischemic events in the operated patients was much lower as well.

Predictors of return to work following carotid endarterectomy.

BACKGROUND: Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is an important part of secondary prevention in selected patients following a transient ischaemic attack or stroke. A key marker of success, return to work following surgery, was assessed in a retrospective cohort study. METHODS: Patients from the UK aged less than 65 years at operation were sent a questionnaire concerning return to work after CEA. Data were analysed using univariable tests and logistic regression. RESULTS: Some 174 (64.4 per cent) of 270 patients responded; their median age was 60 (range 35-64) years and 124 were men. Seventy-five per cent of respondents employed preoperatively returned to work following CEA. Newly retiring patients were older (62 versus 58 years; P < 0.001). Univariable analysis confirmed that age and preoperative stroke influenced return to work. The adjusted odds ratio for patients with versus without a preoperative stroke was 0.46 (95 per cent confidence interval 0.22 to 0.97) (P = 0.040). Median convalescence was 4 weeks, but was shorter in the self-employed (P = 0.039) and prolonged in patients with symptomatic cardiovascular disease (P = 0.023) and those who required postoperative critical care (P = 0.039). CONCLUSION: Return to work following CEA was influenced by age and preoperative stroke.

GPs' views of quality initiatives to improve stroke outcomes following carotid endarterectomy.

BACKGROUND: General practitioners' satisfaction with previous referral of patients may influence their future specialist referral patterns. METHOD: A postal survey of 123 GPs assessing satisfaction with discharge planning and communication from operating surgeons for patients following carotid endarterectomy. General practitioners' views of quality indicators for patient referral also were assessed. RESULTS: General practitioners were significantly more likely to be 'very satisfied' with the level of communication from the operating surgeon (83%) than the discharge planning (65%), (p < 0.001). The most highly ranked quality indicator for use in referring a patient for carotid endarterectomy was the 30 day postoperative complication rate per surgeon (n = 69, 56% 'very useful'). Over one-third (35%) remembered seeing the relevant guidelines for GPs. DISCUSSION: General practitioners value information about surgeon performance when making referral decisions. They are less satisfied with discharge planning than other aspects of care.

Patient outcomes beyond hospitalization: carotid endarterectomy surgical patient outcomes after a rapid recovery program.

Improved surgical techniques for carotid endarterectomy (CEA) surgical patients have resulted in improved postoperative hemodynamic stability of patients and reduced lengths of hospitalization. The purpose of this pilot project was to determine CEA patient outcomes after a rapid recovery hospitalization program. Thirty-nine patients were enrolled in the study and contacted at 1 month after CEA surgery to examine carotid occlusive disease clinical symptoms, functional status, atherosclerotic disease risk-factor reduction, and patient satisfaction. Findings of the pilot study demonstrated that CEA surgical patients were able to resume physical and psychosocial functioning by 1 month after surgery at levels comparable to preoperative functioning. Subjects reported relief of carotid artery occlusive disease symptoms and reported high levels of independent functioning and satisfaction with CEA surgery. Men in the study had significantly higher levels of reported independence in functioning compared with the women, using a "0" to "10" scale to rate level of functioning independence. Findings from the pilot study will be used to develop an early recovery and atherosclerotic disease risk-factor modification program for CEA surgical patients.

Intensive care is cost-effective in carotid endarterectomy.

The purpose of this study was to analyze the utilization, cost profile, and predictors of intensive care unit (ICU) services after carotid endarterectomy. A retrospective medical record review of all patients undergoing isolated carotid endarterectomy by a vascular surgery service at one university hospital during a 12-month period was performed. Eighty-four patients undergoing 91 carotid endarterectomies were identified for review. All carotid endarterectomy patients at the authors' institution were routinely admitted to an ICU postoperatively. Sixty-five of the 91 patients (71.4%) required ICU interventions, the majority of which were intravenous antihypertensive therapy. There were no deaths in the group. There was one non-fatal stroke (1.1%), and one non-fatal myocardial infarction (1.1%). There were three reoperations (3.3%): two for hematoma and one for a change in neurological status. One patient required reintubation. Five of the six major adverse events after carotid endarterectomy occurred within 12 hours postoperatively. No preoperative factors predicted a significant risk for complications following carotid endarterectomy. There is no reliable predictor that carotid endarterectomy patients will require postoperative interventions or develop adverse outcomes. Mandatory intensive care immediately after carotid endarterectomy upholds high safety standards, avoids the uncertainty of preoperative ICU planning, and avoids the high cost of a recovery room stay to determine the need for intensive care. In addition, costs may be further reduced as the ICU length of stay may be decreased if there are no necessary interventions or complications after 12 hours of intensive care.