Nurse-Sensitive Indicators as Predictors of Trauma Patient Discharge Disposition.

BACKGROUND: About 3.5 million trauma patients are hospitalized every year, but 35%-40% require further care after discharge. Nurses' ability to affect discharge disposition by minimizing the occurrence of nurse-sensitive indicators (catheter-associated urinary tract infection [CAUTI], central line-associated bloodstream infection [CLABSI], and hospital-acquired pressure injury [HAPI]) is unknown. These indicators may serve as surrogate measures of quality nursing care. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether nursing care, as represented by three nurse-sensitive indicators (CAUTI, CLABSI, and HAPI), predicts discharge disposition in trauma patients. METHODS: This study was a secondary analysis of the 2021 National Trauma Data Bank. We performed logistic regression analyses to determine the predictive effects of CAUTI, CLABSI, and HAPI on discharge disposition, controlling for participant characteristics. RESULTS: A total of n = 29,642 patients were included, of which n = 21,469 (72%) were male, n = 16,404 (64%) were White, with a mean (SD) age of 44 (14.5) and mean (SD) Injury Severity Score of 23.2 (12.5). We created four models to test nurse-sensitive indicators, both individually and compositely, as predictors. While CAUTI and HAPI increased the odds of discharge to further care by 1.4-1.5 and 2.1 times, respectively, CLABSI was not a statistically significant predictor. CONCLUSIONS: Both CAUTI and HAPI are statistically significant predictors of discharge to further care for patients after traumatic injury. High-quality nursing care to prevent iatrogenic complications can improve trauma patients' long-term outcomes.

Just-in-Time Video Using QR Codes: An Approach to Pediatric Trauma Nursing Education.

BACKGROUND: High acuity trauma and patients in cardiopulmonary arrest are not frequently seen in all pediatric Level I trauma centers. Yet, nurses are required to manage these patients in fast-paced, high-pressure environments. OBJECTIVE: This project aims to develop and evaluate an education program for high-risk, low-volume equipment and skills in the pediatric emergency department setting. METHODS: This is a pre- and post-quality improvement study conducted in a Northeastern United States pediatric Level I trauma center. Emergency department nurses were invited to view videos detailing high-risk, low-volume equipment use. For the convenience of access, Quick Response (QR) codes linked to the videos were placed on each piece of equipment reviewed. General self-efficacy and levels of self-efficacy in using the equipment were assessed before the intervention and again after 4 weeks from January to February 2023. RESULTS: A total of 43 pediatric emergency nurses participated in the education. The mean aggregate general self-efficacy score was 32.93. Mean scores in all areas (Level 1 rapid infuser, fluid warmer, blood administration, and securing an endotracheal tube) improved after the intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Easily accessible, brief refresher videos linked to QR codes in the pediatric emergency department can help empower nurses who need to use high-risk, low-volume equipment.

Development of a Standardized Nursing Handoff With Tablet Technology: A Quality Improvement Initiative.

BACKGROUND: Nursing handoff of complete and accurate information is critical for patient safety yet is often difficult to achieve with consistency between nursing departments. OBJECTIVE: This quality improvement project aims to describe the development and piloting of a standardized handoff tool for administration by computer tablet for nursing report. METHODS: This descriptive quality improvement initiative was conducted in an 885-bed Level I trauma center in the Southeast Region of the United States. The study was completed in three phases. First, emergency department and trauma intensive care unit nurses were surveyed to determine handoff barriers and best practices. Second, the survey information was used to develop a standardized handoff tool incorporating tablet technology. Third, staff pilot testing was performed, followed by a final survey to ascertain staff feedback on the tool. RESULTS: A total of n = 120 nurses completed the surveys, and pilot testing was conducted on n = 177 patient handoffs. Ninety-five percent of nurses expressed satisfaction with the tool and 65% with the tablet. CONCLUSION: This study supported using a standardized handoff tool between the emergency department and trauma intensive care unit and substantiated the benefits of using a tablet for face-to-face communication.

Stress and Coping in Emergency Nurses Following Trauma Patient Care: A Qualitative Grounded Theory Approach.

BACKGROUND: Experiencing symptoms of traumatic stress may be the cost of caring for trauma patients. Emergency nurses caring for trauma patients are at risk for traumatic stress reactions. OBJECTIVE: This study explored the stress and coping behaviors experienced by emergency nurses who provide trauma care. METHODS: Focus groups were held at three urban trauma centers in the Midwestern United States: a Level I pediatric trauma center, a Level I adult trauma center, and a Level III adult trauma center. Data were collected between December 2009 and March 2010. Data analysis was guided by the principles of grounded theory. Line-by-line coding and constant comparative analysis techniques were used to identify recurring constructs. RESULTS: A total of 48 emergency nurses participated. Recurring constructs emerged in the data analysis and coding, revealing four major themes: care of the trauma patient, professional practice, personal life, and support. CONCLUSIONS: Nurse job engagement, burnout, and professional and personal relationships are influenced by trauma patient care. The study's resulting themes of care of the trauma patient, professional practice, personal life, and support resulted in the development of the "trauma nursing is a continual experience theory" that can be used as a framework to address these effects. Intentional support and timely interventions based on this new theory can help mitigate the effects of traumatic stress experienced by trauma nurses.

Elements of an Advanced Trauma Education Program for Emergency Nurses: A Modified Delphi Approach.

BACKGROUND: Basic trauma education for emergency department (ED) staff is available, but there are currently no advanced trauma nursing practice standards for ED nurses. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to identify consensus-based elements of an advanced trauma nursing program for ED nurses. METHODS: We used a modified Delphi process with three rounds of online survey data collection to ensure a large group of geographically diverse experts. Data were collected from February 2023 to May 2023. The sample for Round 1 was recruited from members of the Emergency Nurses Association reporting job titles, including trauma coordinator, trauma nursing core course instructor, and vice president of trauma services (n = 829). Participants in subsequent rounds were drawn from respondents to the initial invitation to participate (n = 131). Members of an emergency nursing research council with clinical and research expertise reviewed the results and provided expert input. RESULTS: An initial sample of 131 experts identified 17 elements that were assigned a median score equivalent to "agree/strongly agree" (i.e., median 4/5 or 5/5) in Round 2 (n = 69). These elements were presented in Round 3 (n = 43) to determine a rank order. Critical thinking/clinical judgment was the overall priority, followed by assessment/reassessment and early recognition of trauma. CONCLUSIONS: Emergency department trauma care experts identified priority content for advanced trauma education. Heterogeneity in the final ranking of components for this advanced trauma course, specifically differences by facility, regional, or demographic characteristics, suggests that training and education may not conform to a one-size-fits-all model.

Impact of Bedside Laparotomy Simulation and Microlearning on Trauma Nurse Role Clarity, Knowledge, and Confidence.

BACKGROUND: The care of patients undergoing low-volume, high-risk emergency procedures such as bedside laparotomy (BSL) remains a challenge for surgical trauma critical care nurses. OBJECTIVES: This study evaluates simulation and microlearning on trauma nurse role ambiguity, knowledge, and confidence in caring for patients during emergency BSL. METHODS: The study is a single-center, prospective pretest-posttest design conducted from September to November 2022 at a Level I trauma center in the Mid-Atlantic United States using simulation and microlearning to evaluate role clarity, knowledge, and confidence among surgical trauma intensive care unit (STICU) nurses. Participants, nurses from a voluntary convenience sample within a STICU, attended a simulation and received three weekly microlearning modules. Instruments measuring role ambiguity, knowledge, and confidence were administered before the simulation, after, and again at 30 days. RESULTS: From the pretest to the initial posttest, the median (interquartile range [IQR]) Role Ambiguity scores increased by 1.0 (1.13) (p < .001), and at the 30-day posttest, improved by 1.33 (1.5) (p < .001). The median (IQR) knowledge scores at initial posttest improved by 4.0 (2.0) (p < .001) and at the 30-day posttest improved by 3.0 (1.75) (p< .001). The median (IQR) confidence scores at initial posttest increased by 0.08 (0.33) (p = .009) and at the 30-day posttest improved by 0.33 (0.54) (p = .01). CONCLUSIONS: We found that simulation and microlearning improved trauma nurse role clarity, knowledge, and confidence in caring for patients undergoing emergency BSL.

Perceived trauma nursing core competency, interprofessional collaborative competency, and associated barriers among regional trauma center nurses.

INTRODUCTION: As key members of interprofessional teams working in complex settings, nurses in trauma centers require trauma nursing core competency. PURPOSE: This study sought to determine the levels and relationships of the perceived importance and performance of trauma nursing core competency, as well as the interprofessional collaborative competency and associated barriers among Korean regional trauma center nurses. METHODS: This cross-sectional, descriptive, and correlational survey involved a convenience sample of 190 Korean trauma center nurses. Data were collected using a web-based self-reporting questionnaire about the perceived importance and performance of trauma nursing core competency, as well as the interprofessional collaborative competency and associated barriers. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, Pearson's correlation, and multiple regression (Enter method) analyses. RESULTS: The perceived performance and importance of interprofessional collaborative competency, the perceived importance of trauma nursing core competency, and the perceived barriers to resources, training, competency, and interest significantly affected trauma nursing core competency performance, accounting for 64.5 % of the variance. CONCLUSIONS: Training programs are needed to improve the core and interprofessional collaborative competencies of trauma nurses. Individual, team, and organizational approaches are essential to addressing the perceived barriers. The effects of training programs on the core competency of trauma nurses should be validated.

The Game Is On and We're in the Ninth! Evolution of the Trauma Nursing Core Course, Ninth Edition.

Trauma is a global phenomenon resulting in the death of millions of people every year and affecting countless others. Foundational to excellence in trauma nursing, which contributes to optimal patient outcomes, is evidence-based education driven by best practices accompanied by a systematic approach to the assessment and care of the injured patient. The Trauma Nursing Core Course has provided nurses with the knowledge necessary for the assessment and management of injured patients since the first course was held in 1986. The 9th Edition, launched in July of 2023, continues to provide nurses worldwide with knowledge necessary based on current evidence-based literature and resources. A revision is an arduous process necessitating a concerted team approach involving Emergency Nurses Association member volunteers, internal and external experts, and a lot of dedication!

Development and Evaluation of a Web-Based Application for Trauma Nursing Documentation in Thailand: A Feasibility Study.

BACKGROUND: Electronic nursing documentation has advantages for monitoring and improving the quality of trauma nursing documentation. However, electronic nursing documentation has rarely been implemented in Thailand. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to assess the feasibility and nursing satisfaction of a web-based trauma nursing documentation application. METHODS: A descriptive cross-sectional survey design was used to assess the feasibility and nursing satisfaction with a web-based trauma nursing documentation application. The application was based on literature review, Advanced Trauma Life Support principles, and the North American Nursing Diagnosis Association. The survey was administered to trauma and emergency department registered nurses in a hospital in Thailand from November 2021 to January 2022. Patient data were also extracted from the web application system for analysis. RESULTS: A total of 59 nurses piloted the web-based application on 79 trauma patients. Of 59 nurses, 45 (76.3%) were female, 44 (74.6%) had worked in the emergency department for more than 5 years, and 49 (83.1%) had no prior experience with using web-based applications. The nurses were satisfied with the application (M = 3.51, SD = 0.62), and they suggested that it was feasible to apply in practice (M = 3.46, SD = 0.79). CONCLUSION: These preliminary data demonstrate that implementing a web-based application for trauma nursing documentation in the emergency department is feasible and satisfactory to nurses.

Tertiary survey by trauma nurse specialist at a paediatric trauma centre.

INTRODUCTION: Tertiary surveys aim to detect injuries missed in the initial assessment of trauma. We introduced a process by which the trauma nurse specialist performed a number of the tertiary surveys (NTSs) at our paediatric trauma centre. METHODS: Data from the first six months following introduction of the NTS were compared to retrospective data from the six months prior to NTS implementation (pre-NTS), when trauma surveys were completed by medical staff. RESULTS: Over the 12-month period, 130 children met the criteria for a tertiary survey. Pre-NTS, 57/62 eligible patients received a tertiary survey, compared to 61/68 during NTS (p=0.77). There were significantly more road traffic crash patients in the NTS group (p=0.008) but no significant differences by demographics, injury pattern, injury severity score or outcomes. New injuries were found in three patients pre-NTS compared to five patients during NTS (odds ratio 1.3 (95%CI 1.3-2.0, p=0.73)). CONCLUSION: This study conservatively supports the hypothesis that, with training and support, a trauma nurse specialist can perform tertiary surveys as effectively as doctors. A larger study is required to confirm these findings.

Prioritizing Injury Prevention: Cause of Injury Text Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Motor vehicle (MVCs) and motorcycle crashes (MCCs) continue to be among the most prevalent mechanisms of trauma injury and mortality. We sought to identify specific populations and factors associated with MVCs and MCCs for local injury prevention efforts. A novel, yet easily performed, research method was utilized-a qualitative content analysis of text narratives describing each patient's cause of injury. OBJECTIVE: To determine target populations for local MVC and MCC injury prevention. METHODS: A retrospective descriptive analysis was performed using registry data from a Level I trauma center. The registry was queried for all trauma patients presenting with MVC or MCC injuries between June 8, 2014, and June 7, 2019. Cases were then reviewed via their respective text narratives of injury causation. Common themes were identified, coded by independent raters, and assessed for interrater reliability using Cohen's κ. Frequencies and proportions are reported for each preventable factor and patient characteristic. RESULTS: There were a total of 2,861 cases studied, of which 2,330 (81.4%) were MVC and 531 (18.6%) were MCC. Demographics varied by mechanism of injury. Driver drug or alcohol use was involved in 97 (3.4%), protective devices were not used in 776 (27.1%), distracted driving was involved in 30 (1%), excessive speeding was involved in 152 (5.3%), and driver sleeping/syncope/medical condition was present in 113 (3.9%) cases. CONCLUSIONS: Content analysis of cause of injury text narratives can detect target populations and preventable factors to direct injury prevention efforts specific to the local population.

Health-Related Quality of Life After Polytrauma: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Following hospital discharge after traumatic injuries, many patients' rehabilitation is inhibited by poor health-related quality of life (HRQoL). OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this review is to identify factors that influence the HRQoL of polytrauma patients after hospital discharge. METHODS: A systematic literature search was performed in CINAHL and PubMed databases for English-language articles published between January 2015 and January 2020. Articles that dealt with pediatric or narrow adult populations, exclusively considered brain and spinal cord injuries, burn injuries, or isolated fractures were excluded. In total, 22 nonexperimental cohort studies were eligible for inclusion. RESULTS: Based on these studies, with minor disagreements explainable by deficient sampling, variables that impacted HRQoL fell into 11 categories: demographics, preinjury HRQoL, preexisting conditions, mental health status, injury type and location, injury severity, course of hospitalization, time after injury, financial and employment status, functional capacity, and pain. CONCLUSION: The finding with the greatest implications was that mental health, positive coping, self-efficacy, and perception of physical state significantly influence HRQoL after injury and, along with other modifiable variables, can be optimized by directed treatment. Additionally, targeted assessments and interventions can be utilized to improve quality of life for patients with nonmodifiable risk factors.

Improving a Mature Palliative Care Program at a Level I Trauma Center.

BACKGROUND: Similar to the significant rise in the geriatric population in the United States, trauma centers have seen an increase in geriatric trauma patients. These patients present with additional challenges such as a higher likelihood of undertriage, mortality, and frailty. In addition, the varying presence of advanced directive documentation increases the importance of early palliative care consultations for geriatric trauma patients. OBJECTIVE: In 2018, a Level I trauma center in the Midwest reviewed the American College of Surgeons Trauma Quality Improvement Program's Palliative Care Best Practice Guideline to identify opportunities for improvement to strengthen the collaboration between the palliative care consult service and trauma program. METHODS: The guideline drove improvements, which included documentation changes (i.e., expansion of palliative care consultation triggers, frailty assessment, advanced directives questions, depression screening, and addition of palliative care consultation section on the performance improvement program form) and training (1-hr lecture on palliative care and 5-hr palliative care simulation training) opportunities. RESULTS: A 3-month manual chart review (March 2019 through May 2019) revealed that by May 2019, 87.2% of admitted geriatric trauma patients received frailty assessments, which surpassed the benchmark (≥85%). In addition, advanced care planning questions (i.e., health care power of attorney, do not resuscitate order, or living will) exceeded the benchmarks set forth by the guideline (≥90%), with all of the questions being asked and documented in 95.7% of those same patient charts by May 2019. CONCLUSION: This quality improvement project has applicability for trauma centers that treat geriatric trauma patients; using the guidelines can drive changes to meet individual institution needs.

The Building Blocks to a Highly Effective Trauma Program.

BACKGROUND: Well-developed trauma programs take years of planning, dedication, and commitment to the trauma population to achieve the desired outcomes and, even more, resilience and persistence to maintain a high-quality standard of care. Despite widespread trauma care systems across the nation and their link to improved outcomes for the trauma patient, there is a paucity of literature outlining the foundational elements required to evolve and grow a successful trauma program. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this article is to outline the key elements for developing and maintaining a successful trauma program that yields high-quality patient outcomes. METHODS: Developing a program requires intense focus and continued efforts. Multiple foundational building blocks can facilitate program success and foster program growth. RESULTS: Foundational elements include leadership structure and support, building the right team, clinical expertise, trauma registry, program data, research, outreach and education, injury prevention, and ensuring adequate survey readiness. Building on these foundational elements, engagement of stakeholders at all levels throughout the program and organization can help drive program growth. Using these strategies, a program has been able to grow from 7.6 full-time equivalents to 24.4 in just a few short years while achieving, exceeding, and sustaining top metrics across state and national benchmarks. CONCLUSION: A program can achieve sustainable, high-quality outcomes for the trauma patient by following a structured team approach to program development. Using the outlined building blocks for program development and sustainability, a successful trauma program can lead to improved patient and program outcomes.