Photoparoxysmal response and its characteristics in a large EEG database using the SCORE system.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize photoparoxysmal EEG response (PPR) using a standardized protocol of intermittent photic stimulation (IPS) and standardized definitions for PPR, classified into six types. METHODS: Using the SCORE system (Standardized Computer-Based Organized Reporting of EEG) we prospectively built a large database of standardized EEG annotations. In this study, we extracted the features related to PPR from the structured dataset consisting of 10,671 EEG recordings with IPS, from 7,188 patients. RESULTS: The standardized IPS protocol elicited PPR in 375 recordings (3.5%), in 288 patients (4%), with a preponderance among young (11-20 years) and female patients (67%). PPR was persistent in patients with multiple recordings. The most frequent type of PPR was activation of preexisting epileptogenic area (58%), followed by generalized-PPR limited to the stimulus train (22%). We could not find any recording with self-sustained posterior response. Seizures were elicited in 27% of patients with PPR, most often myoclonic seizures and absences, in patients with self-sustained generalized PPR. CONCLUSIONS: The most common type of PPR was accentuation of preexisting epileptogenic area. Self-sustained posterior response could not be documented. Self-sustained generalized-PPR had the highest association with seizures. SIGNIFICANCE: Using standardized stimulation protocol and definitions for PPR types, IPS provides high diagnostic yield.

A propositional AI system for supporting epilepsy diagnosis based on the 2017 epilepsy classification: Illustrated by Dravet syndrome.

PURPOSE: The 2017 epilepsy and seizure diagnosis framework emphasizes epilepsy syndromes and the etiology-based approach. We developed a propositional artificial intelligence (AI) system based on the above concepts to support physicians in the diagnosis of epilepsy. METHODS: We analyzed and built ontology knowledge for the classification of seizure patterns, epilepsy, epilepsy syndrome, and etiologies. Protégé ontology tool was applied in this study. In order to enable the system to be close to the inferential thinking of clinical experts, we classified and constructed knowledge of other epilepsy-related knowledge, including comorbidities, epilepsy imitators, epilepsy descriptors, characteristic electroencephalography (EEG) findings, treatments, etc. We used the Ontology Web Language with Description Logic (OWL-DL) and Semantic Web Rule Language (SWRL) to design rules for expressing the relationship between these ontologies. RESULTS: Dravet syndrome was taken as an illustration for epilepsy syndromes implementation. We designed an interface for the physician to enter the various characteristics of the patients. Clinical data of an 18-year-old boy with epilepsy was applied to the AI system. Through SWRL and reasoning engine Drool's execution, we successfully demonstrate the process of differential diagnosis. CONCLUSION: We developed a propositional AI system by using the OWL-DL/SWRL approach to deal with the complexity of current epilepsy diagnosis. The experience of this system, centered on the clinical epilepsy syndromes, paves a path to construct an AI system for further complicated epilepsy diagnosis.

Crossing the lines between epilepsy syndromes: a myoclonic epilepsy variant with prominent eyelid myoclonia and atonic components.

Accurate diagnosis of a distinct epilepsy syndrome is based on well-defined electroclinical features that differentiate separate nosological entities. In clinical practice, however, syndromes may overlap and cases may present with unusual manifestations posing a diagnostic challenge. This heterogeneity has been documented in several cases presenting with eyelid myoclonia with or without absences (EMA) diagnosed either as Jeavons syndrome (JS) variants or as genetic generalised epilepsies defined by the presence of this unique clinical entity. The hallmark of JS is the triad: (1) eyelid myoclonia with or without absences, (2) eye closure-induced paroxysms, and (3) photosensitivity. The presence of massive myoclonus, intellectual disability, or slowing of the EEG background are not typical features of the syndrome and may cause delay in making the correct diagnosis. Adding to the variability of clinical features, we describe two female paediatric patients with probable genetic epilepsy who presented with EMA but demonstrated clear atypical features, such as prominent myoclonic seizures, atonic components on video-EEG, and cognitive impairment. We also note the presence of interictal and ictal posterior discharges during eyelid myoclonia in one, supporting similar previous observations leading to consideration of EMA as an occipital cortex-initiated seizure activity. [Published with video sequences on www.epilepticdisorders.com].

The visual system in eyelid myoclonia with absences.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the functional and structural brain correlates of eyelid myoclonus and absence seizures triggered by eye closure (eye closure sensitivity [ECS]). METHODS: Fifteen patients with eyelid myoclonus with absences (EMA, Jeavons syndrome), 14 patients with idiopathic generalized epilepsies (IGE) without ECS, and 16 healthy controls (HC) underwent an electroencephalography (EEG)-correlated functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and voxel brain morphometry (VBM) protocol. The functional study consisted of 30-second epochs of eyes-open and eyes-closed conditions. The following EEG events were marked and the relative fMRI maps obtained: (1) eye closure times, (2) spontaneous blinking, and (3) spontaneous and eye closure-triggered spike and wave discharges (SWD; for EMA and IGE). Within-group and between-groups comparisons were performed for fMRI and VBM data as appropriate. RESULTS: In EMA compared to HC and IGE we found: (1) higher blood oxygenation level-dependent (BOLD) signal related to the eye closure over the visual cortex, the posterior thalamus, and the network implicated in the motor control of eye closure, saccades, and eye pursuit movements; and (2) increments in the gray matter concentration at the visual cortex and thalamic pulvinar, whereas decrements were observed at the bilateral frontal eye field area. No BOLD differences were detected when comparing SWD in EMA and IGE. INTERPRETATION: Results demonstrated altered anatomo-functional properties of the visual system in EMA. These abnormalities involve a circuit encompassing the occipital cortex and the cortical/subcortical systems physiologically involved in the motor control of eye closure and eye movements. Our work supports EMA as an epileptic condition with distinctive features and provides a contribution to its classification among epileptic syndromes.

Late-onset epilepsy with status myoclonicus: a diagnostic and management dilemma.

Status myoclonicus (myoclonic status epilepticus) has been described in generalized epilepsy syndromes, neurodegenerative disease, infectious or inflammatory neurologic disease, toxic-metabolic states, and following anoxic brain injury. It is extremely uncommon in elderly people. Hence, status myoclonicus can be a challenge to diagnose and manage especially if it is cryptogenic epilepsy (unknown cause). We describe the case of a 77-year-old female who had new-onset uncontrolled seizures despite three antiepileptic drugs. Following concern about nonepileptic events, she was eventually diagnosed by epilepsy monitoring to have status myoclonicus. Her seizures were then controlled with appropriate antiepileptic drug changes.

A tale of two EEGs - Photic driving or photoparoxysmal discharge.

A 29-year-old woman has a history of developmental delay and focal segmental glomerulosclerosis resulting in kidney failure. She underwent renal transplant which unfortunately failed, and is on hemodialysis as well as immunosuppression including tacrolimus. She was recently hospitalized for urosepsis requiring intensive treatment with vasopressors and multiple antibiotics. Soon after discharge, she was noted to have unstable gait, multifocal twitches, falls, and very brief episodes of staring or inattentiveness. She was readmitted. Her head CT was normal and lumbar puncture was negative. A bedside EEG was requested and showed an unusual response during photic stimulation.

The classification and differential diagnosis of absence seizures with short-term video-EEG monitoring during childhood.

Absence seizures are idiopathic epilepsies characterized by impairment of consciousness and generalized 2.5-4 Hz spike and slow wave discharges. This prospective study was performed to classify and define properties of subgroups of absence epilepsies. We included 31 patients, of whom seven were in the differential diagnosis group. On admission, absence epilepsy provisional diagnosis was considered in 16 patients clinically and in the other 15 patients based on routine EEG findings. Ictal EEGs were recorded by video-EEG monitoring in 23 of the patients (totally 202 ictal recordings). Patients were diagnosed as childhood absence epilepsy (n=8), juvenile absence epilepsy (n=10), juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (n=3), eyelid myoclonia with absences (n=2), and perioral myoclonia with absences (n=1). Neuroimaging, video-EEG monitoring and especially ictal recordings are important for classification of epilepsies in addition to history, physical examination and routine EEG findings. Video-EEG monitoring is required to classify, to make differential diagnosis and to determine the treatment plan and prognosis.

Dravet syndrome history.

Severe myoclonic epilepsy of infancy (SMEI) is a complex form of epilepsy that was first described in France in 1978. Because the myoclonic component of this epilepsy is not always present and because some variability has been observed in the symptomatology, the name was changed to Dravet syndrome in 1989. The genetic aetiology of this epilepsy was discovered in 2001, and since then numerous studies have contributed to a better knowledge of the disease. Around 70% of affected patients are carriers of a mutation on the alpha subunit of the SCN1A gene. An accurate analysis of the clinical features leads to the distinction between typical and atypical forms, both with the same unfavourable prognosis and the same genetic background. However, many studies are being conducted in order to establish correlations between phenotypes and genotypes, and to understand the factors underlying the cognitive impairment of the affected patients.

Borderline Dravet syndrome: a useful diagnostic category?

The term "borderline" severe myoclonic epilepsy of infancy (SMEIB) has been used to designate patients in whom myoclonic seizures or generalized spike and wave activity are absent. It has also been used loosely to indicate mild forms of the syndrome. It is now acknowledged that the course and outcome of patients with SMEIB are the same as in the core syndrome. The rate of patients exhibiting SCN1A gene mutations is also similar, and it has been observed that the same mutations can cause both typical and "borderline" forms, indicating causal homogeneity. Defining a borderline form of a syndrome would mean setting the criteria of semiology and severity whereby a given phenotype falls within and outside the core syndrome. Such process has never been made for Dravet syndrome and is of course unrealistic in view its polymorphic expression. The eponym Dravet syndrome has been preferred to designate a syndrome spectrum that also embraces SMEIB. Therefore the term "borderline" Dravet syndrome is improper. The definition "mild form" of Dravet syndrome would certainly be more suitable to indicate those patients exhibiting a less severe or incomplete form of the syndrome. Variability in severity favors the concept that SCN1A loss of function causes a spectrum of epilepsy phenotypes in which seizures, often prolonged and precipitated by fever, are the prominent feature and schematic subdivisions would be inappropriate, at least in the early stages. An initial definition of SCN1A gene-related epilepsy would perhaps be more suitable when a mutation of this gene is ascertained and the clinical picture is still ill defined.

Electroclinical characterization and classification of symptomatic epilepsies with very early onset by multiple correspondence analysis.

PURPOSE: To characterize very early onset symptomatic epilepsies electroclinically, to identify meaningful factors to delineate epilepsy syndromes under this category, and to test validity of the current syndromic organization of these epilepsies by the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE). METHODS: Subjects were 38 epileptic patients with seizure onset before 3 months of age. We investigated the age of seizure onset, seizure types, myoclonus, EEG features, neuroimaging studies, outcome of seizures and development. We performed multiple correspondence analysis (MCA) to reveal associations among these characteristics and to find important characteristics to divide this epilepsy group into subgroups. RESULTS: Very early onset epilepsies were characterized by partial seizures and epileptic spasms, especially occurring in combination as a single ictal event (combined seizures), and poor outcome. Suppression-burst (SB), hypsarrhythmia, EEG asymmetry and structural brain abnormalities were common. MCA demonstrated that presence or absence of SB was the most meaningful factor to separate this group into subgroups. MCA on the subgroup with SB revealed a subset with early-onset spasms, partial seizures with single focus, no myoclonus, SB during wakefulness and sleep, no EEG asynchrony, hypsarrhythmia and combined seizures, and another subset with late-onset spasms, partial seizures with multiple foci, myoclonus, EEG asynchrony, no combined seizures, SB during sleep only, no EEG asymmetry, no structural abnormality and no hypsarrhythmia. These corresponded to Ohtahara syndrome and early myoclonic encephalopathy, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Very early onset symptomatic epilepsies have the electroclinical characteristics distinct from those with later onset. This study supported the current ILAE organization on this epilepsy group from statistic approach.

[Myoclonus and epilepsy: diagnosis and pathophysiology]. / Myoclonies et myoclonies épileptiques: orientation diagnostique et connaissances physiopathologiques.

Myoclonus presents as a sudden brief involuntary jerk triggered by the central nervous system. Electromyographic studies enable determining whether the jerk is caused by a muscular contraction, i.e. positive myoclonus, or by an interruption of muscular activity, i.e. negative myoclonus. Many classifications have been proposed, reflecting our lack of understanding about myoclonus. Myoclonus is a symptom and should never be considered as a diagnosis. Clinical history and physical examination are the basis to diagnosis. Clinical neurophysiology testing can reveal a neuroanatomical localization and certain patterns have some etiological specificity. Etiological hypotheses can be put forward on the basis of clinical and neurophysiological data. The cortex is the most commonly identified source of myoclonus, but the subcortical area and spinal area can also be involved. Myoclonus is considered epileptic when it is combined with an epileptiform discharge on the EEG. The International Classification of Epileptic Syndromes should be applied in this situation. Myoclonic epilepsies are a collection of syndromes in which myoclonic seizures are a prominent feature. Myoclonus can occur as one among several seizure components, as the only manifestation of seizure, or as one of multiple seizure types within an epileptic syndrome. Neurophysiological studies are needed to investigate the pathophysiological mechanisms of the myoclonus. Electrophysiological studies report that myoclonic seizures are produced through a cortical generator via a polysynaptic mechanism acting on muscles. Apparently, the epileptiform discharges stimulate the motor cortex resulting in myoclonus jerk. Despite recent progress, advances are still needed to achieve a better understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms involved in myoclonus. In myoclonic epileptic syndromes, more useful information can probably be obtained from studies grouping several patients with a same epileptic syndrome than from single case reports.

FAME 3: a novel form of progressive myoclonus and epilepsy.

BACKGROUND: Familial adult myoclonic epilepsy (FAME) is associated with myoclonus, tremor, and rare seizures, and is a nonprogressive disorder linked to the FAME 1 locus. A similar disorder has been linked to the FAME 2 locus. METHODS: Seventeen patients from two families with myoclonus and epilepsy were evaluated clinically and underwent EEG, EMG, jerk-locked averaging, and MRI scanning. Three had responses to magnetic stimulation assessed. Linkage was assessed for microsatellite markers across the FAME 1 and 2 loci. RESULTS: The median age at onset was 20 years, with many patients having frequent seizures, cognitive impairment, and cerebellar dysfunction. Electrophysiologic features of cortical myoclonus were typically present, but photosensitivity was uncommon. MRI frequently demonstrated cerebellar atrophy. Pathology of a single case showed Purkinje cell loss, dentate atrophy, and neuronal loss and gliosis in the olives and pallidum. Analysis of genotypes for markers at the FAME 1 and FAME 2 loci excluded these as the region containing the same locus in one family, but only the FAME 2 locus was excluded in the other family. CONCLUSIONS: This form of familial adult myoclonic epilepsy does not show linkage to either of the known familial adult myoclonic epilepsy loci, and is characterized in some members by frequent seizures, cerebellar ataxia, dementia, and progression of the disease. This may represent a new form of progressive myoclonus and epilepsy, which we have termed familial adult myoclonic epilepsy type 3.

Myoclonic status in nonprogressive encephalopathies: study of 29 cases.

PURPOSE: Myoclonic status in nonprogressive encephalopaties (MSNE) is characterized by recurrence of long-lasting myoclonic status appearing in infants and young children with nonprogressive encephalopathy. Here, we describe the electroclinical features and evolution of MSNE. METHODS: Between February 1, 1990 and July 31, 2005, 29 patients who met diagnostic criteria of MSNE were enrolled in the study at our department and have been followed up to the present time. RESULTS: Three main subgroups could be identified. The first subgroup of 18 patients presented myoclonic absences and rhythmic myoclonias. These were followed by a brief silent period related to a subcontinuous delta-theta activity involving the central areas, and rhythmic delta waves with superimposed spikes mainly involving the parietooccipital regions and often activated by eye closure. It was found in all children with a genetic etiology. The second subgroup included five patients showing a pattern characterized by inhibitory phenomena associated with a dystonic component and sudden irregular rapid lightning-like jerks. The EEG showed subcontinuous multifocal slow spike-waves, predominating in frontocentral regions. These patients are affected by a cortical malformation or the etiology is unknown. The third subgroup included six children who initially suffered from myoclonic absences. The status was initially characterized by subcontinuous generalized spike-wave-type paroxysms related to rhythmic myoclonia of face and limbs. After 1-3 weeks, the EEG showed sharp theta waves with very slow pseudorhythmic continuous spikes in the central regions and vertex. The etiology was found to be perinatal anoxic injury. CONCLUSION: MSNE should be considered as a new epileptic syndrome in the group of epileptic encephalopathy.

The natural history of myoclonic astatic epilepsy (Doose syndrome) and Lennox-Gastaut syndrome.

The purpose of this article is to present a short review of the natural history of myoclonic astatic epilepsy (MAE; Doose syndrome) and the Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS). In the 1989 classification of the International League Against Epilepsy (ILAE, 1989), MAE and LGS were initially included in group 2.2: "Cryptogenic or symptomatic generalized epilepsies and syndromes." The subsequent classification of the Proposed Diagnostic Scheme for People with Epileptic Seizures and with Epilepsy (see Ref. 8) placed MAE in axis 3 in the "generalized epilepsy" group and LGS, severe myoclonic epilepsy of infancy (SMEI or Dravet syndrome) and atypical benign partial epilepsy/pseudo-Lennox syndrome (ABPE/PLS) in the "epileptic encephalopathy" group. The semiology of MAE and LGS and their differential diagnosis from SMEI and ABPE/PLS are described. Before the onset of SMEI, MAE, and ABPE/PLS, the development of the child is usually normal. In contrast, in LGS, development is frequently retarded at the onset, depending on the etiopathogenesis of the underlying brain disease. The course of MAE is highly variable with regard to seizure outcome (complete remission in some cases, persistent epilepsy in others) and cognitive development (normal or delayed). The course of LGS and SMEI is generally poor, both with regard to the epilepsy and to the cognitive development whereas the course and seizure outcome of ABPE/PLS is favorable; the patients will be seizure-free at puberty. However, the neuropsychological outcome is less favorable; most patients remain mentally retarded.

Some genetic and biochemical aspects of myoclonus.

Can a gene defect be responsible for the occurrence in an individual, at a particular age, of such a muscle twitch followed by relaxation called: "myoclonus" and defined as sudden, brief, shock-like movements? Genetic defects could indeed determine a subsequent cascade of molecular events (caused by abnormal encoded proteins) that would produce new aberrant cellular relationships in a particular area of the CNS leading to re-built "myoclonogenic" neuronal networks. This can be illustrated reviewing some inherited neurological entities that are characterized by a predominant myoclonic picture and among which a clear gene defect has been identified. In the second part of this chapter, we will also propose a new point of view on how some structural genes could, under certain conditions, when altered, produced idiopathic generalized epilepsy with myoclonic jerks, taking juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME) and the myoclonin (EFHC-1) gene as examples.

Familial cortical myoclonic tremor with epilepsy: a single syndromic classification for a group of pedigrees bearing common features.

Fifty Japanese and European families with cortical myoclonic tremor and epilepsy have been reported under various names. Unfamiliarity with the syndrome often leads to an initial misdiagnosis of essential tremor or progressive myoclonus epilepsy. A detailed overview of the literature is lacking and is the scope of this study. Disease characteristics are adult onset, distal action tremor and myoclonus, epileptic seizures, autosomal dominant inheritance, benign course, effectiveness of antiepileptic drugs, and possibly cognitive decline. A channelopathy is hypothesized to be the basis of the disease. Despite phenotypic and genetic differences between the Japanese and European pedigrees, the clinical and electrophysiological data point toward one syndrome. To avoid confusion in literature and possible misdiagnosis of patients, we propose to use one description and suggest "familial cortical myoclonic tremor with epilepsy" (FCMTE). In addition, we put forward diagnostic criteria to give a starting point from which to conduct genetic studies.