Levetiracetam versus carbamazepine monotherapy in the management of pediatric focal epilepsy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Levetiracetam (LEV) and carbamazepine (CBZ) are effective monotherapies for focal epilepsy in children. However, the best drug remains controversial. Therefore, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing LEV and CBZ monotherapy in the management of pediatric focal epilepsy (PFE). We searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published until February 2024 comparing LEV and CBZ monotherapy in PFE. Statistical analysis was performed using R version 4.2.2, heterogeneity was assessed using I2 statistics, and the risk of bias was evaluated using the RoB-2 tool. Risk Ratios (RR) with p < 0.05 were considered significant. The outcomes of interest were seizure freedom, any adverse events, adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation, dermatologic adverse events, and the frequency of at least one seizure, defined as the proportion of patients experiencing one or more seizures during the treatment period. Four RCTs comprising 381 children with a mean age of 7.32 to 9.28 years were included, of whom 186 (48.8%) received LEV monotherapy. There was no significant difference between groups (RR: 1.15; 95% CI 0.88-1.50; p = 0.31; I2 = 90%) regarding seizure freedom. The frequency of at least one seizure (RR: 0.71; 95% CI 0.52-0.97; p = 0.03; I2 = 8%) and dermatologic adverse events (RR: 0.24; 95% CI 0.09-0.64; p < 0.01; I2 = 0%) were both significantly lower in the LEV group. There were no significant differences in the presence of any adverse events (RR: 0.58; 95% CI 0.33-1.01; p = 0.05; I2 = 36%) or adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation (RR: 0.67; 95% CI 0.13-3.42; p = 0.63; I2 = 30%).Conclusion: In monotherapy, LEV was more advantageous than CBZ for PFE, with a lower frequency of seizures and fewer dermatological adverse events. However, both drugs are equally effective in achieving seizure freedom, adverse events without specification, and those that lead to treatment discontinuation. Our findings have important implications for clinical practice and decision-making in this condition.

[Neuropsychological profile of Mexican paediatric patients with pharmacoresistant focal epilepsy]. / Perfil neuropsicológico de pacientes pediátricos mexicanos con epilepsia focal farmacorresistente.

INTRODUCTION: At least 20% of paediatric patients with epilepsy present resistance to multiple anti-crisis drugs in trials, which has a negative impact on their neuropsychological state, quality of life and prognosis; it is therefore necessary to document their neuropsychological profile in order to improve the clinical approach to them. AIMS: To describe the neuropsychological profile (cognitive, academic, behavioural, emotional, adaptive, sleep disturbances and quality of life) of paediatric patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy in the frontal, temporal and occipital lobes, and to compare performance between patients with frontal and temporal foci, and to assess the link between the duration of the condition, the frequency of seizures and the amount of anti-crisis drugs and the neuropsychological profile. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The neuropsychological profile of 19 paediatric patients with a diagnosis of pharmacoresistant epilepsy with a mean age of 10.89 years was evaluated. RESULTS: 57.9% of the 19 patients were men. 63.2% presented frontal focus; 26.3% presented temporal focus; and 10.5% presented occipital focus. Deficiencies in attention, comprehension, verbal memory, working memory and processing speed, in addition to adaptive difficulties were observed. When the patients with frontal and temporal focus were compared, the former were found to present greater deficits in planning, while the patients with temporal focus presented more severe symptoms of anxiety. Patients with a longer disease duration were found to present greater impairment to their intelligence quotient and adaptive behavioural skills. CONCLUSIONS: Pharmacoresistant epilepsy in paediatric patients affects intelligence quotient and adaptive skills, as well as attention, memory and executive functions, and neuropsychological intervention programmes must therefore be implemented to improve these patients' quality of life.

TITLE: Perfil neuropsicológico de pacientes pediátricos mexicanos con epilepsia focal farmacorresistente.Introducción. Al menos el 20% de los pacientes pediátricos con epilepsia muestra resistencia a los ensayos de múltiples fármacos anticrisis, que impactan negativamente en su estado neuropsicológico, calidad de vida y pronóstico; por tal motivo, es necesario documentar ampliamente su perfil neuropsicológico para mejorar su abordaje clínico. Objetivos. Describir el perfil neuropsicológico (cognitivo, académico, conductual, emocional, adaptativo, alteraciones del sueño y calidad de vida) de pacientes pediátricos con epilepsia focal farmacorresistente de los lóbulos frontal, temporal y occipital, así como comparar el desempeño entre los pacientes con foco frontal y temporal, y evaluar la asociación entre la duración del padecimiento, la frecuencia de las crisis y la cantidad de fármacos anticrisis con el perfil neuropsicológico. Pacientes y métodos. Se evaluó el perfil neuropsicológico de 19 pacientes pediátricos con diagnóstico de epilepsia farmacorresistente, con una edad promedio de 10,89 años. Resultados. De los 19 pacientes, el 57,9% fueron hombres. El 63,2% presentó foco frontal; el 26,3%, temporal; y el 10,5%, occipital. Se encontraron deficiencias en atención, comprensión, memoria verbal, memoria de trabajo y velocidad de procesamiento, además de dificultades adaptativas. Al comparar a los pacientes con foco frontal y temporal, se encontró que los primeros presentaron mayores deficiencias en planificación, mientras que los pacientes con foco temporal presentaron mayores síntomas de ansiedad. Con respecto a la duración de la enfermedad, se encontró que los pacientes con mayor duración del padecimiento presentaron mayor afectación en el cociente intelectual y en las habilidades en la conducta adaptativa. Conclusiones. La epilepsia farmacorresistente en pacientes pediátricos afecta el cociente intelectual y las habilidades adaptativas, así como a la atención, la memoria y las funciones ejecutivas, por lo que es necesaria la implementación de programas de intervención neuropsicológica para mejorar la calidad de vida de estos pacientes.

Cannabidiol as an adjuvant treatment in adults with drug-resistant focal epilepsy.

Cannabidiol oil (CBD) has been approved as an anti-seizure medication for the treatment of uncommon types of epilepsy, occurring in children: Dravet syndrome, Lennox-Gastaut syndrome, and Tuberous Sclerosis Complex. There are few publications in relation to use the CBD in adult patients with focal drug-resistant epilepsy. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy, tolerability, safety, and quality of life, of adjuvant treatment with CBD, in adult patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy for at least 6 months. An open, observational, prospective cohort study was conducted using a before-after design (time series) in adult patients undergoing outpatient follow-up in a public hospital in Buenos Aires, Argentina. From a total of 44 patients, 5% of patients were seizure-free, 32% of patients reduced more than 80% of their seizures and 87% of patients reduced 50% of their monthly seizures. Eleven percent presented a decrease of less than 50% in seizure frequency. The average final dose was 335 mg/d orally administered. Thirty-four percent of patients reported mild adverse events and no patient reported severe adverse effects. At the end of the study, we found in most patients a significant improvement in the quality of life, in all the items evaluated. Adjuvant treatment with CBD in adult patients with drug-resistant focal epilepsy was effective, safe, well tolerated, and associated with a significant improvement in their quality of life.

[Quality of life in people with epilepsy: beyond seizures]. / Calidad de vida en personas con epilepsia. Más allá de las crisis.

INTRODUCTION: People with epilepsy have multiple barriers to recovery: access to medication, comorbidities and social problems. The aim of this study is to determine psychosocial factors associated with the perception of quality of life in people with epilepsy in the department of Bolivar, Colombia, in the year 2022. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Descriptive cross-sectional study, correlational, with a sample stratified with a margin of error of 5%, according to the calculation of the average number of people treated for epilepsy in Colombia. 174 people participated with a mean age of 39.55 years, 50% men and 50% women. An instrument was used that determined sociodemographic data, quality of life (Quality of Life in Epilepsy Inventory-10), adherence to treatment (Morisky test), self-care behaviors, perception of disability and provision of health services. All the instruments showed a Cronbach's Alpha greater than 0.686 for this population. RESULTS: 21.3% had focal onset epilepsy; 41% with generalized epilepsy without focal onset; 18.4% with focal onset that generalized; 12.6% did not know their type of epilepsy; and 6.3% reported that they were not informed about their type of epilepsy. Based on correlations, an explanatory model of quality of life is shown, with pillars such as drug adherence, self-care habits, time without seizures, and perceived disability. CONCLUSIONS: Although time without seizures is a fundamental element in recovery, living conditions and mental health problems are key elements to achieve a better quality of life in epilepsy.

TITLE: Calidad de vida en personas con epilepsia. Más allá de las crisis.Introducción. Las personas con epilepsia tienen múltiples barreras para recuperarse: acceso a medicamentos, comorbilidades y problemas sociales. El objetivo del presente estudio es determinar factores psicosociales asociados con la percepción de la calidad de vida en personas con epilepsia en el departamento de Bolívar, Colombia, en el año 2022. Sujetos y métodos. Estudio descriptivo de corte transversal, correlacional, con un muestreo estratificado con un margen de error del 5%, según el cálculo del promedio de personas atendidas por epilepsia en Colombia. Participaron 174 personas con una edad media de 39,55 años, un 50% hombres y un 50% mujeres. Se usó un instrumento que determinó datos sociodemográficos, calidad de vida (Quality of Life in Epilepsy Inventory-10), adhesión al tratamiento (test de Morisky), conductas de autocuidado, percepción de incapacidad y prestación de los servicios de salud. Todos los instrumentos mostraron un alfa de Cronbach superior a 0,686 para esta población. Resultados. El 21,3% contó con epilepsia de inicio focal; el 41%, con epilepsia generalizada sin inicio focal; el 18,4%, con epilepsia de inicio focal que generaliza; el 12,6% desconocía su tipo de epilepsia; y el 6,3% manifestó que no fue informado sobre su tipo de epilepsia. Basándose en correlaciones, se muestra un modelo explicativo de calidad de vida, con pilares como la adhesión farmacológica, los hábitos de autocuidado, el tiempo sin crisis y la incapacidad percibida. Conclusiones. Aunque el tiempo sin crisis constituye un elemento fundamental en la recuperación, las condiciones de vida y los problemas de salud mental constituyen elementos claves para lograr una mejor calidad de vida en epilepsia.

Eficacia y seguridad de lacosamida como tratamiento complementario en pacientes pediátricos con epilepsia focal refractaria / Efficacy and safety of lacosamide as adjunctive treatment in pediatric patients with refractory focal epilepsy

ANTECEDENTES: En el marco de la metodología ad hoc para evaluar solicitudes de tecnologías sanitarias, aprobada mediante Resolución de Institución de Evaluación de Tecnologías en Salud e Investigación N° 97-IETSI-ESSALUD-2022, se ha elaborado el presente dictamen que expone la evaluación de la eficacia y seguridad de lacosamida para el tratamiento de pacientes pediátricos con epilepsia focal refractaria. Así, el médico Dr. Edwin Martín Lazo Rivera, especialista en neurología pediátrica del Hospital Nacional Carlos Alberto Seguín Escobedo - Red Asistencial Arequipa y la Dra. Rebeca Fiorella Valdivia Bravo, especialista en pediatría del Hospital Nacional Alberto Sabogal Sologuren de la Red Prestacional Sabogal, siguiendo la Directiva N° 003-IETSI-ESSALUD-2016, enviaron al Instituto de Evaluación de Tecnologías en Salud e Investigación ­ IETSI sus respectivas solicitudes de autorización de uso del producto farmacéutico lacosamida no incluido en el Petitorio Farmacológico de EsSalud. ASPECTOS GENERALES: La epilepsia es una condición del sistema nervioso central caracterizada por crisis epilépticas recurrentes y no provocadas por desencadenantes inmediatos identificables. Así, la crisis epiléptica es aquel acontecimiento transitorio de signos y/o síntomas originados por una actividad neuronal cerebral sincrónica anormal o excesiva, que puede manifestarse por fenómenos sensitivos, motores, sensoriales o autonómicos con o sin pérdida de la conciencia, ya que dependen del área cerebral donde se originan. En ese sentido, las crisis convulsivas se clasifican según tres posibilidades de origen: las de inicio focal, generalizado y desconocido. Las crisis focales, a su vez, se pueden subclasificar en aquellas que tienen pérdida o no de la consciencia, para posteriormente categorizar si los síntomas son motores o no motores. En consecuencia, los especialistas deciden el abordaje terapéutico de los pacientes con epilepsia focal teniendo en cuenta esta clasificación, adicional a la etiología y a las comorbilidades asociadas (Reséndiz-Aparicio et al.,2019, Fisher et al.,2017, INSN.,2020). En todo el mundo, la epilepsia afecta aproximadamente a 65 millones de personas, reportándose una incidencia de la epilepsia de 67,8 por 100 000 habitantes en los países en desarrollo (Mohammadzadeh et al., 2022). En el Perú, se estima que la prevalencia de epilepsia es de 11,9 a 32,1 por cada 1000 personas (Burneo et al., 2017). Asimismo, es conocido que la incidencia de la epilepsia en la población pediátrica es de aproximadamente 0,5 % a 1 % de la población general. Además, algunos estudios sugieren que hasta el 60 % de los pacientes pediátricos con epilepsia presentarán remisión de su condición, mientras que alrededor del 20 % a 30 % de los pacientes con epilepsia serán refractarios al tratamiento médico (Ortiz de la Rosa et al., 2015). METODOLOGÍA: La búsqueda bibliográfica exhaustiva se llevó a cabo con el objetivo de identificar la mejor evidencia disponible sobre la eficacia y seguridad de lacosamida para el tratamiento de pacientes pediátricos con epilepsia focal refractaria a los FAE disponibles en EsSalud. La búsqueda bibliográfica se realizó en las bases de datos PubMed, The Cochrane Library. Web of Science y LILACS. Adicionalmente, se amplió la búsqueda revisando la evidencia generada por grupos internacionales que realizan revisiones sistemáticas (RS), evaluaciones de tecnologías sanitarias (ETS) y guías de práctica clínica (GPC) de: la National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), la American Academy of Neurology (ANN), la American Epilepsy Society (AES), la Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN), la Internacional Database of GRADE Guideline (BIGG), la Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH), la Comissáo Nacional de Incorporadáo de Tecnologias no Sistema Único de Saúde (CONITEC) y el Ministerio de Salud del Perú (MINSA). Adicionalmente, se realizó una búsqueda manual en las bases el portal de la Base Regional de Informes de Evaluación de Tecnologías en Salud de las Américas (BRISA), y el repositorio institucional de la Dirección General de Medicamentos, Insumos y Drogas (DIGEMID). Finalmente, se realizó una búsqueda en el portal ClinicalTrials.govdel National Institutes of Health (NIH) para identificar ensayos clínicos en desarrollo o que aún no hayan sido publicados. La metodología de tipo escalonada fue utilizada para la selección de documentos a ser incluidos en el presente dictamen. De acuerdo con los criterios de elegibilidad, se priorizaron durante la selección: GPC, ETS, RS de ensayos clínicos (EC) con o sin metaanálisis (MA), y ensayos clínicos aleatorizados (ECA) de fase III. Se elaboraron estrategias de búsqueda sensibles en bases de datos bibliográficas y sitios web para obtener la evidencia científica que permita responder a la pregunta PICO. Las estrategias de búsqueda incluyeron términos relacionados con la intervención y población de interés. Se emplearon términos MeSH4, así como términos de lenguaje libre, junto con operadores booleanos para cada una de las bases de datos elegidas para la búsqueda. Los registros obtenidos de la búsqueda bibliográfica fueron importados al aplicativo web Rayyan (http://rayyan.qcri.org/) para una revisión manual por título y resumen. La selección de los estudios se realizó en una primera fase por dos evaluadores del Equipo Técnico del IETSI de manera independiente (búsqueda par); evaluando los títulos y resúmenes en relación con la pregunta PICO y seleccionando aquellos que serían evaluados a texto completo en una segunda fase por un único evaluador. En la segunda fase, uno de los evaluadores revisó los documentos a texto completo incluidos en la primera fase y realizó la selección final de los estudios. RESULTADOS: Luego de la búsqueda bibliográfica, se incluyó una GPC elaborada por la National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE 2022), y un ECA de fase III, NCT01921205 (Farkas et al., 2019). CONCLUSIÓN: Por lo expuesto, el Instituto de Evaluación de Tecnologías en Salud e Investigación aprueba el uso de lacosamida para el tratamiento complementario en pacientes pediátricos con epilepsia focal refractaria, como producto farmacéutico no incluido en el Petitorio Farmacológico de EsSalud, según lo establecido en el Anexo N° 1. La vigencia del presente informe preliminar es de un año a partir de la fecha de publicación. Así, la continuación de dicha aprobación estará sujeta a la evaluación de los resultados obtenidos y de mayor evidencia que pueda surgir en el tiempo.

Cannabis-based magistral formulation is highly effective as an adjuvant treatment in drug-resistant focal epilepsy in adult patients: an open-label prospective cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: The safety and efficacy of a formulation high in cannabidiol (CBD) and low in ∆9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) to treat drug-resistant epilepsy have been examined previously in children, but not in adult population. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether CBD-rich oil, as an add-on treatment to conventional antiepileptic drugs, was effective, safe, and well-tolerated in adults with drug-resistant focal epilepsy (DRFE). METHODS: An open-label, prospective cohort, single-center in adult patients with DRFE, were receiving stable doses of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs). A cannabis based-magistral formulation (CBMF) (100 mg/ml CBD and THC <1.9 mg/ml) was administrated 0.1 ml sublingually every 12 hours, up-titrated weekly. The primary outcome was to establish a reduction in seizures frequency >50% at 12 weeks. Adverse-drug reactions monitoring was done. p-value <0.05 was statistically significant. RESULTS: Between August 2020 and July 2022, 44 (38.6%) patients completed >3 months of follow-up. The median daily dose of CBD was 200 mg, that of THC was 4 mg, and that of CBD per kilogram of weight was 3.7 mg. The median number of seizures per month before CBD treatment was 11, and after CBD treatment was 2.5 (p<0.001). A reduction in seizures >50% at 12 week was achieved in 79.5% of the patients. The median percentage change in seizure frequency per month was 84.1% at 12 weeks. Five patients reported any adverse-drug reactions. CONCLUSION: The CBMF is a highly effective and safety therapy to treat adult patients with DRFE. The reduction in seizures frequency is maintained over time.

Clinical characteristics of patients with epilepsy attending primary health care. / Características clínicas de pacientes con epilepsia atendidos en la atención primaria.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to fill the current knowledge gap in the literature by identifying the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with epilepsy attending primary health care (PHC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study involving adults (= 18 years of age) with epilepsy attending PHC from a developing country between 2015 and 2019. Demographic information and epilepsy-related data were collected. RESULTS: A total of 140 patients (51.4% male; mean [± SD] age 44.9 ± 17.8 years) were evaluated. The mean age at onset of seizures was 29.9 ± 22.9 years, with a mean evolution of 14.3±15.4 years. Focal seizures accounted for 88.57% of cases and evolved into bilateral tonic-clonic attack (45.16%). Of those that were generalized, motor seizures accounted for 81.82%, absence 9.09%, and motor + absence 9.09%. Among generalized onset motor seizures, tonic-clonic was predominant, accounting for 55.56%. Among types, focal epilepsy predominated (88.57%). The primary etiologies were unknown (62.14%), structural causes (27.85%) and infectious (9.28%). Patients undergoing monotherapy accounted for 66.1%, with epilepsy control in 92.4%. The most commonly used antiepileptic drugs were carbamazepine (33.1%), valproic acid (28.2%), and phenobarbital (10.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Male sex, seizures, and focal epilepsy were prevalent. Magnetic resonance imaging was more useful than computed tomography. Most etiologies were unknown; however, mesial temporal sclerosis and neurocysticercosis were the most prevalent known causes. Most patients were controlled using a monotherapy regimen. The implementation of International League Against Epilepsy classifications and definitions was feasible and useful.

TITLE: Características clínicas de pacientes con epilepsia atendidos en la atención primaria.Objetivo. Este estudio tuvo como objetivo llenar el vacío de conocimiento actual en la bibliografía mediante la identificación de las características demográficas y clínicas de los pacientes con epilepsia que asisten a la atención primaria de salud. Pacientes y métodos. Éste fue un estudio transversal que involucró a adultos (18 años o mayores) con epilepsia que asistieron a atención primaria de salud de un país en desarrollo entre 2015 y 2019. Se recopilaron información demográfica y datos relacionados con la epilepsia. Resultados. Se evaluó a un total de 140 pacientes ­51,4%, varones; edad media (± desviación estándar), 44,9 ± 17,8 años­. La edad media de inicio de las crisis fue de 29,9 ± 22,9 años, con una evolución media de 14,3 ± 15,4 años. Las crisis focales presentes en el 88,57% de los casos y evolucionaron a crisis tonicoclónicas bilaterales (45,16%). De las generalizadas, las crisis motoras predominaron con el 81,82%; las ausencias, el 9,09%; y las motoras + ausencias, el 9,09%. Entre las crisis motoras de inicio generalizado, predominó la tonicoclónica, con un 55,56%. Entre los tipos, predominó la epilepsia focal (88,57%). Las etiologías primarias fueron desconocidas (62,14%), causas estructurales (27,85%) e infecciosas (9,28%). Los pacientes en monoterapia representaron el 66,1%, con control de la epilepsia en el 92,4%. Los fármacos antiepilépticos más utilizados fueron la carbamacepina (33,1%), el ácido valproico (28,2%) y el fenobarbital (10,4%). Conclusiones. Predominaron el sexo masculino, las convulsiones y la epilepsia focal. La resonancia magnética fue más útil que la tomografía computarizada. La mayoría de las etiologías se desconocían; sin embargo, la esclerosis temporal mesial y la neurocisticercosis fueron las causas conocidas más prevalentes. La mayoría de los pacientes se controlaron con un régimen de monoterapia. La implementación de las clasificaciones y definiciones de la Liga Internacional contra la Epilepsia fue factible y útil.

Common Ictal and Interictal Perfusion Patterns: A Window into the Epileptogenic Network and SUDEP Mechanism in Drug-Resistant Focal Epilepsy.

BACKGROUND: Focal epilepsies have been described as a network disease. Noninvasive investigative techniques have been used to characterize epileptogenic networks. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to describe ictal and interictal cortical and subcortical perfusion patterns using single- photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). METHODS: Thirty-five interictal-ictal SPECT scans were obtained from 15 patients with DRE. A methodology was developed to get a relative perfusion index (PI) of 74 cortical and sub-cortical brain structures. K-means algorithm, together with modified v-fold cross-validation, was used to identify the two regions of interest (ROIs) that represent hypoperfused and hyperperfused areas. RESULTS: In common with the individual analysis, the statistical analysis evidenced that the hyperperfusion ROIs resulting from group analysis during interictal and ictal involved mainly the cingulate gyrus, cuneus, lingual gyrus, and gyrus rectus as well as the putamen. ROIs hypoperfused included the red nucleus, the substantia nigra, and the medulla. The medians of the group analysis of the hypoperfusion and hyperperfusion ROIs were 0.601-0.565 and 1.133-1.119 for the ictal and interictal states, correspondingly. A group of mostly cortical structures involved in the hyperperfused ROIs in both interictal and ictal states showed no change or negative change in the transition from interictal to ictal state (mean change of -0.002). On the other hand, the brain stem, basal ganglia, red nucleus, and thalamus revealed a mean global change of 0.19, indicating a mild increase in the PI. However, some of these structures (red nucleus, substantia nigra, and medulla oblongata) remained hypoperfused during the interictal to ictal transition. CONCLUSION: The methodology employed made it possible to identify common cortical and subcortical perfusion patterns not directly linked to epileptogenicity, for a better epileptogenic network and sudden unexpected death (SUDEP) mechanism in DRE.

Factors involved in time reduction between seizure relapses in patients with epilepsy attending emergency rooms in Medellín, Colombia.

BACKGROUND: Seizure relapses are the leading cause of admission to emergency rooms (ER) in people with epilepsy. OBJECTIVE: To analyze administrative and clinical factors associated with the duration between seizure relapses in people with epilepsy admitted to the Neurological Institute of Colombia (Medellin) between July 2018 and July 2019. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective follow-up study of 156 patients over 18 years old, diagnosed with epilepsy, and treated for over a year. The outcome variable was the time between seizure relapses, identified through the record of ER attendances. In addition, difficulties in the prescription filling process (delay, omission, or brand change) and clinical characteristics were analyzed as potential associated influence factors. The statistical analysis was performed using the Prentice, Williams & Peterson-Gap Time survival model for recurrent events. Finally, Adjusted Hazard Ratios (aHR) with 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) are also presented. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-six patients were analyzed. Their average age of diagnosis was 15.5 years (SD = 22.5), the median number of monthly seizures was 3 (SD = 9.3), and 50.6% were women. Moreover, difficulties in the prescription filling process were associated with a time reduction between seizure relapses (aHR = 2.61; 95%CI 1.49-4.57), showing a similar impact as having a history of three or four types of events (aHR = 2.96; 95%CI 1.23-7.12) and neuropsychiatric comorbidity (aHR = 1.89; 95%CI 1.04-3.54). CONCLUSION: Neuropsychiatric comorbidity, history of several types of events, and experiencing difficulties with prescription filling are associated with lower benefit from treatment to control seizure relapses.

[Telemedicine and epilepsy: healthcare experience of a national reference center during the COVID-19 pandemic]. / Telemedicina y epilepsia: experiencia asistencial de un centro de referencia nacional durante la pandemia de COVID-19.

INTRODUCTION: Countries worldwide are having to cope with the COVID-19 pandemic caused by SARS-CoV-2. The burden on their national health systems is currently at unprecedented levels. Telemedicine care was initiated at an early stage in our centre. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a descriptive and retrospective study to evaluate the usefulness of telemedicine during lockdown in our centre. Patients included in the study had a clinical diagnosis of epilepsy, with two visits via telemedicine, who had been followed up for at least six months during the normal situation prior to the COVID-19 pandemic and two face-to-face consultations during the same period. RESULTS: A total of 115 patients were included. The average age was 29 years, 53% were males, 52.2% had focal epilepsy, 58.3% with a structural causation and 57.4% had difficult-to-treat epilepsy. The mean number of seizures prior to lockdown was 9.73/month and 6.54/month during lockdown. The number of patients who were seizure-free when lockdown ended was higher than that observed in the phase before it began: 54 versus 45 out of 115. CONCLUSIONS: Telemedicine is a very useful strategy for monitoring the course, progress and therapeutic changes in epileptic patients in the short and medium term. The reduction in the seizure frequency can be sustained in the medium term, not only in the short term as corroborated in previous studies. Telemedicine allows access to virtually all patients and closer monitoring.

TITLE: Telemedicina y epilepsia: experiencia asistencial de un centro de referencia nacional durante la pandemia de COVID-19.Introducción. El mundo entero está afrontando la pandemia por COVID-19 causada por el SARS-CoV-2. Los sistemas de salud nacionales están sometidos a niveles de sobrecarga sin precedentes. En nuestro centro se inició de forma temprana la asistencia a través de telemedicina. Pacientes y métodos. Es un estudio descriptivo y retrospectivo para evaluar la utilidad de la telemedicina durante el confinamiento en nuestro centro. Se incluyó a los pacientes con diagnóstico clínico de epilepsia, con dos asistencias a través de telemedicina, que tuvieran seguimiento durante al menos seis meses durante la situación de normalidad previa a la pandemia por COVID-19 y dos consultas presenciales durante ese mismo período. Resultados. Se incluyó a 115 pacientes. La media de edad fue de 29 años, el 53% fueron varones, el 52,2% con epilepsia focal, el 58,3% de etiología estructural y el 57,4% presentaba epilepsia de difícil control. La media de crisis preconfinamiento fue de 9,73/mes y de 6,54/mes durante el confinamiento. El número de pacientes libres de crisis fue mayor al final del confinamiento respecto a la fase preconfinamiento, 54 frente a 45/115. Conclusiones. La telemedicina es una estrategia de mucha utilidad en la monitorización de la evolución, el control evolutivo y los cambios terapéuticos en pacientes epilépticos a corto y medio plazo. La reducción de la frecuencia de crisis puede mantenerse a medio plazo, no sólo a corto plazo como se corroboró en estudios previos. La telemedicina permite acceder a prácticamente la totalidad de los pacientes y realizar un seguimiento más cercano.

Continuous epileptiform discharges during sleep as an evolutionary pattern in patients with congenital Zika virus syndrome.

Congenital Zika virus syndrome (CZVS) is associated with severe neurological deficits. Clinical characteristics of epilepsy and the electroencephalographic (EEG) pattern in CZVS were documented in infancy. In this study, we aimed to describe the EEG findings observed during the follow-up of children with CZVS. Seventy-six EEGs of 55 children (60% female; mean age = 50 months) with confirmed CZVS were analyzed, considering the background, interictal, and ictal epileptiform discharges. Continuous (or almost continuous) epileptiform discharges during non-rapid eye movement sleep were identified in 22 (40%) patients. In 20 (90.1%) patients, the pattern was symmetrical, with an anterior predominance of the epileptiform activity. All patients with this pattern had epilepsy, which was severe in 15 (68.2%) and demanded polytherapy in 19 (86.4%). Subcortical calcifications (77.3%) and multifocal EEGs (72.8%) in earlier ages occurred more often in patients with this pattern. Other unspecific interictal EEG patterns were focal epileptiform discharges in 23 (41.8%) and multifocal activity in six (10.9%). In CZVS, continuous (or almost continuous) epileptiform discharges during sleep emerge as a pattern after the second year of life. This was associated with severe and drug-resistant epilepsy, but not necessarily with an apparent regression. Subcortical calcifications and multifocal epileptiform discharges in infancy are associated with this pattern.

Early epilepsy in children with Zika-related microcephaly in a cohort in Recife, Brazil: Characteristics, electroencephalographic findings, and treatment response.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the incidence of epilepsy in children with Zika-related microcephaly in the first 24 months of life; to characterize the associated clinical and electrographic findings; and to summarize the treatment responses. METHODS: We followed a cohort of children, born during the 2015-2016 Zika virus (ZIKV) epidemic in Brazil, with congenital microcephaly and evidence of congenital ZIKV infection on neuroimaging and/or laboratory testing. Neurological assessments were performed at ≤3, 6, 12, 15, 18, 21, and 24 months of life. Serial electroencephalograms were performed over the first 24 months. RESULTS: We evaluated 91 children, of whom 48 were female. In this study sample, the cumulative incidence of epilepsy was 71.4% in the first 24 months, and the main type of seizure was infantile spasms (83.1%). The highest incidence of seizures occurred between 3 and 9 months of age, and the risk remained high until 15 months of age. The incidence of infantile spasms peaked between 4 and 7 months and was followed by an increased incidence of focal epilepsy cases after 12 months of age. Neuroimaging results were available for all children, and 100% were abnormal. Cortical abnormalities were identified in 78.4% of the 74 children evaluated by computed tomography and 100% of the 53 children evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging. Overall, only 46.1% of the 65 children with epilepsy responded to treatment. The most commonly used medication was sodium valproate with or without benzodiazepines, levetiracetam, phenobarbital, and vigabatrin. SIGNIFICANCE: Zika-related microcephaly was associated with high risk of early epilepsy. Seizures typically began after the third month of life, usually as infantile spasms, with atypical electroencephalographic abnormalities. The seizure control rate was low. The onset of seizures in the second year was less frequent and, when it occurred, presented as focal epilepsy.

Vinpocetina de liberación prolongada: un posible tratamiento adyuvante en crisis epiléptica de inicio focal / Extended-release vinpocetine: a possible adjuvant treatment for focal onset epileptic seizures

Resumen Introducción: La vinpocetina de liberación prolongada ha demostrado ser efectiva en el control de crisis de inicio focal en pacientes epilépticos con una baja frecuencia de eventos adversos. Se realizó un estudio clínico para evaluar la eficacia y tolerabilidad de la vinpocetina como tratamiento adyuvante en pacientes con este padecimiento. Métodos: Se realizó un estudio clínico, doble ciego, de grupos paralelos. Se reclutaron 87 pacientes con diagnóstico de epilepsia focal tratados con uno a tres fármacos antiepilépticos. Los pacientes se aleatorizaron para ser tratados con vinpocetina (n = 41) o placebo (n = 46) de manera adyuvante a su tratamiento, e ingresaron a la fase basal (4 semanas), a la fase de titulación (4 semanas) y a la fase de evaluación (8 semanas) conservando estables las dosis de la vinpocetina y de los fármacos antiepilépticos. Resultados: La vinpocetina fue más efectiva que el placebo en la reducción de las crisis al finalizar la fase de evaluación (p < 0.0001). El 69% de los pacientes tratados con vinpocetina presentaron una reducción mayor al 50% en las crisis en comparación con el 13% de los pacientes tratados con placebo. No se presentaron diferencias significativas en cuanto a la presencia de efectos adversos en los pacientes tratados con vinpocetina comparados con los tratados con placebo. Los eventos adversos más frecuentes observados con vinpocetina fueron cefalea (7.9%) y diplopía (5.2%). Conclusiones: Como tratamiento adyuvante, la vinpocetina (2 mg/kg/día) redujo eficazmente la frecuencia de crisis epilépticas y demostró ser bien tolerada. Presenta un amplio perfil de seguridad y eventos adversos conocidos, que son transitorios y sin secuelas.

Abstract Background: Extended-release vinpocetine is effective to control focal onset epileptic seizures with a low rate of adverse events. A clinical study was performed to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of vinpocetine as an adjuvant treatment in patients with this condition. Methods: A double-blind clinical study of parallel groups was conducted, in which 87 patients with a diagnosis of focal epilepsy treated with one to three antiepileptic drugs were recruited. Patients were randomized to receive vinpocetine (n = 41) or placebo (n = 46) adjuvant to their treatment. Patients entered the baseline phase (4 weeks), the titration phase (4 weeks) and the evaluation phase (8 weeks), maintaining stable doses of vinpocetine and their respective antiepileptic drug treatment. Results: Vinpocetine was more effective than placebo in reducing seizures at the end of the evaluation phase (p < 0.0001). Sixty-nine percent of the vinpocetine-treated patients had a 50% reduction in seizures compared to 13% of placebo-treated patients. No significant differences in the presence of adverse effects in patients treated with vinpocetine compared to those treated with placebo were observed. The most frequent adverse events observed with vinpocetine were headache (7.9%) and diplopia (5.2%). Conclusions: As an adjuvant treatment, vinpocetine (2 mg/kg/day) effectively reduced the frequency of epileptic seizures and proved to be well tolerated. Vinpocetine has a wide safety profile and well-known adverse events, which are transient and with no sequelae.

Extended-release vinpocetine: a possible adjuvant treatment for focal onset epileptic seizures.

Background: Extended-release vinpocetine is effective to control focal onset epileptic seizures with a low rate of adverse events. A clinical study was performed to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of vinpocetine as an adjuvant treatment in patients with this condition. Methods: A double-blind clinical study of parallel groups was conducted, in which 87 patients with a diagnosis of focal epilepsy treated with one to three antiepileptic drugs were recruited. Patients were randomized to receive vinpocetine (n = 41) or placebo (n = 46) adjuvant to their treatment. Patients entered the baseline phase (4 weeks), the titration phase (4 weeks) and the evaluation phase (8 weeks), maintaining stable doses of vinpocetine and their respective antiepileptic drug treatment. Results: Vinpocetine was more effective than placebo in reducing seizures at the end of the evaluation phase (p < 0.0001). Sixty-nine percent of the vinpocetine-treated patients had a 50% reduction in seizures compared to 13% of placebo-treated patients. No significant differences in the presence of adverse effects in patients treated with vinpocetine compared to those treated with placebo were observed. The most frequent adverse events observed with vinpocetine were headache (7.9%) and diplopia (5.2%). Conclusions: As an adjuvant treatment, vinpocetine (2 mg/kg/day) effectively reduced the frequency of epileptic seizures and proved to be well tolerated. Vinpocetine has a wide safety profile and well-known adverse events, which are transient and with no sequelae.

Introducción: La vinpocetina de liberación prolongada ha demostrado ser efectiva en el control de crisis de inicio focal en pacientes epilépticos con una baja frecuencia de eventos adversos. Se realizó un estudio clínico para evaluar la eficacia y tolerabilidad de la vinpocetina como tratamiento adyuvante en pacientes con este padecimiento. Métodos: Se realizó un estudio clínico, doble ciego, de grupos paralelos. Se reclutaron 87 pacientes con diagnóstico de epilepsia focal tratados con uno a tres fármacos antiepilépticos. Los pacientes se aleatorizaron para ser tratados con vinpocetina (n = 41) o placebo (n = 46) de manera adyuvante a su tratamiento, e ingresaron a la fase basal (4 semanas), a la fase de titulación (4 semanas) y a la fase de evaluación (8 semanas) conservando estables las dosis de la vinpocetina y de los fármacos antiepilépticos. Resultados: La vinpocetina fue más efectiva que el placebo en la reducción de las crisis al finalizar la fase de evaluación (p < 0.0001). El 69% de los pacientes tratados con vinpocetina presentaron una reducción mayor al 50% en las crisis en comparación con el 13% de los pacientes tratados con placebo. No se presentaron diferencias significativas en cuanto a la presencia de efectos adversos en los pacientes tratados con vinpocetina comparados con los tratados con placebo. Los eventos adversos más frecuentes observados con vinpocetina fueron cefalea (7.9%) y diplopía (5.2%). Conclusiones: Como tratamiento adyuvante, la vinpocetina (2 mg/kg/día) redujo eficazmente la frecuencia de crisis epilépticas y demostró ser bien tolerada. Presenta un amplio perfil de seguridad y eventos adversos conocidos, que son transitorios y sin secuelas.

Evolución atípica del síndrome de Panayiotopoulos a síndrome de punta-ondas continuas durante el sueño lento / Atypical evolution of Panayiotopoulos syndrome to continuous spikes and wave's syndrome during slow sleep

Introducción: Las epilepsias focales idiopáticas constituyen uno de los grupos de epilepsias más frecuentes en la infancia. Excepcionalmente los pacientes con este tipo de epilepsias tienen evoluciones atípicas que constituyen un reto diagnóstico y terapéutico. Objetivo: Ilustrar la evolución atípica de la epilepsia focal idiopática tipo Panayiotopoulos. Presentación del caso: Adolescente de 13 años que presentó su primera crisis epiléptica a los 5 años de edad, de breve duración, mientras dormía tuvo apertura ocular, desviación de los ojos a la izquierda, abundante salivación y presentó un vómito. En tres años tuvo solo tres crisis. No recibió tratamiento con fármacos antiepilépticos hasta después de la tercera crisis, que fue más prolongada. Tras iniciar tratamiento con carbamazepina comenzó a presentar dificultades en el aprendizaje y marcada hiperactividad. Un electroencefalograma interictal de sueño demostró descargas de punta-ondas continuas en el sueño lento. Después de dos años de tratamiento se alcanzó la normalidad en el estudio electroencefalográfico de sueño, con retirada inicial de la carbamazepina, e introducción progresiva de clobazam y valproato de magnesio. Evolutivamente el paciente mantuvo las dificultades en el aprendizaje, con mejoría notable de su hiperactividad, sin recurrencia de crisis epilépticas. Conclusiones: El caso presentado constituye un ejemplo infrecuente de un paciente con una epilepsia focal idiopática con evolución atípica, probablemente inducida por la carbamazepina, con cuadro clínico-electroencefalográfico de más de dos años de duración, con mejoría favorecida por el tratamiento finalmente empleado, la evolución natural del síndrome o el efecto de ambos (AU)

Introduction: Idiopathic focal epilepsies are one of the most frequent epilepsy groups in childhood. Exceptionally, patients with this type of epilepsy have atypical evolutions that constitute a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. Objective: To illustrate the atypical evolution of idiopathic focal epilepsy, type Panayiotopoulos. Case presentation: A 13-year-old adolescent who presented his first epileptic seizure at 5 years old, of short duration, while he slept had an eye opening, deviation of the eyes to the left, abundant salivation and vomiting. In three years he had only three seizures. He did not receive treatment with antiepileptic drugs until after the third seizure, which was longer. After starting treatment with carbamazepine, he began to have learning difficulties and marked hyperactivity. A sleep's interictal electroencephalogram showed continuous spikes and wave's discharges during the slow sleep. After two years of treatment, the normalization of the sleep electroencephalogram was achieved, with withdrawal of carbamazepine, and progressive introduction of clobazam and magnesium valproate. The patient remained evolutionarily with learning difficulties, with significant improvement in hyperactivity, without recurrence of seizures. Conclusions: The case presented is an infrequent example of a patient with idiopathic focal epilepsy with atypical evolution, probably induced by carbamazepine, with clinical-electroencephalographic symptoms during more than two years, with improvement favored by the final treatment used, the natural evolution of the syndrome or the effect of both(AU)

Síndrome de sensibilidad a fármacos con eosinofilia y síntomas sistémicos debido a la carbamazepina: Caso pediátrico / Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms due to carbamazepine: Pediatric case

Entre las reacciones medicamentosas graves en la piel, se encuentran el síndrome de Stevens-Johnson, la necrólisis epidérmica tóxica y el síndrome de sensibilidad a fármacos con eosinofilia y síntomas sistémicos (drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms; DRESS, por sus siglas en inglés), que son poco comunes en la población pediátrica (incidencia: 1/1000-10 000 niños), sin embargo, tienen mal pronóstico. El síndrome de sensibilidad a fármacos con eosinofilia y síntomas sistémicos consiste en erupciones cutáneas, alteraciones hematológicas, linfadenopatía y afectación de órganos. Se presenta el caso de un paciente masculino de 12 años que desarrolló esta patología después de iniciar el tratamiento anticonvulsivo con carbamazepina. Se considera que es importante que el personal de la salud tenga conocimiento de esta enfermedad para que sea incluida entre los diagnósticos diferenciales de pacientes con afecciones similares, ya que este síndrome es potencialmente mortal.

Severe skin reactions include Stevens-Johnson Syndrome, toxic epidermal necrolysis and Drug reaction with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms (DRESS) syndrome, which are uncommon in the pediatric population (incidence 1/1000-10 000 children), but they have bad prognosis. Drug-sensitive Syndrome with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms consists in rash, hematological abnormalities, lymphadenopathy and organ involvement. We report the case of a 12-year-old male patient who developed this pathology after initiating anticonvulsant therapy with carbamazepine. We consider that it is important to be aware of this disease and to include it among the differential diagnoses in patients with similar conditions because this syndrome is life-threatening.

[Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms due to carbamazepine. Pediatric case]. / Síndrome de sensibilidad a fármacos con eosinofilia y síntomas sistémicos debido a la carbamazepina. Caso pediátrico.

Severe skin reactions include Stevens-Johnson Syndrome, toxic epidermal necrolysis and Drug reaction with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms (DRESS) syndrome, which are uncommon in the pediatric population (incidence 1/1000- 10 000 children), but they have bad prognosis. Drug-sensitive Syndrome with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms consists in rash, hematological abnormalities, lymphadenopathy and organ involvement. We report the case of a 12-year-old male patient who developed this pathology after initiating anticonvulsant therapy with carbamazepine. We consider that it is important to be aware of this disease and to include it among the differential diagnoses in patients with similar conditions because this syndrome is life-threatening.

Entre las reacciones medicamentosas graves en la piel, se encuentran el síndrome de Stevens-Johnson, la necrólisis epidérmica tóxica y el síndrome de sensibilidad a fármacos con eosinofilia y síntomas sistémicos (drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms; DRESS, por sus siglas en inglés), que son poco comunes en la población pediátrica (incidencia: 1/1000- 10 000 niños), sin embargo, tienen mal pronóstico. El síndrome de sensibilidad a fármacos con eosinofilia y síntomas sistémicos consiste en erupciones cutáneas, alteraciones hematológicas, linfadenopatía y afectación de órganos. Se presenta el caso de un paciente masculino de 12 años que desarrolló esta patología después de iniciar el tratamiento anticonvulsivo con carbamazepina. Se considera que es importante que el personal de la salud tenga conocimiento de esta enfermedad para que sea incluida entre los diagnósticos diferenciales de pacientes con afecciones similares, ya que este síndrome es potencialmente mortal.

WITHDRAWN: Oxcarbazepine add-on for drug-resistant partial epilepsy.

BACKGROUND: Most people with epilepsy have a good prognosis and their seizures can be well controlled with the use of a single antiepileptic drug, but up to 30% develop refractory epilepsy, especially those with partial seizures. In this review we summarize the current evidence regarding oxcarbazepine when used as an add-on treatment for drug-resistant partial epilepsy. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effects of oxcarbazepine when used as an add-on treatment for drug-resistant partial epilepsy. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Epilepsy Group's Specialized Register (28 March 2006), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (The Cochrane Library Issue 1, 2006), MEDLINE (1966 to March 2006). No language restrictions were imposed. We checked the reference lists of retrieved studies for additional reports of relevant studies. We also contacted Novartis (manufacturers of oxcarbazepine) and experts in the field. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded, add-on trials of oxcarbazepine in patients with drug-resistant partial epilepsy. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently assessed trials for inclusion and extracted the relevant data. The following outcomes were assessed : (a) 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency; (b) treatment withdrawal (any reason); (c) side effects. Primary analyses were intention-to-treat. Summary odds ratios were estimated for each outcome. MAIN RESULTS: Two trials were included representing 961 randomized patients.Overall Odds Ratio (OR) (95% Confidence Interval (CIs)) for 50% or greater reduction in seizure frequency compared to placebo 2.96 (2.20, 4.00).Treatment withdrawal OR (95% CIs) compared to placebo 2.17 (1.59, 2.97).Side effects: OR (99% CIs) compared to placebo, ataxia 2.93 (1.72, 4.99); dizziness 3.05 (1.99, 4.67); fatigue 1.80 (1.02, 3.19); nausea 2.88 (1.77, 4.69); somnolence 2.55 (1.84, 3.55); diplopia 4.32 (2.65, 7.04), were significantly associated with oxcarbazepine. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Oxcarbazepine has efficacy as an add-on treatment in patients with drug-resistant partial epilepsy, both in adults and children. However, trials reviewed were of relatively short duration, and provide no evidence about the long-term effects of oxcarbazepine. Results cannot be extrapolated to monotherapy or to patients with other epilepsy types.

Efficacy and Tolerability of Antiepileptic Drugs in Patients with Focal Epilepsy: Systematic Review and Network Meta-analyses.

Several newer antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) have been introduced into clinical practice, offering choices for individualizing the treatment of epilepsy since AEDs have different efficacy and tolerability profiles. In particular, questions exist regarding which AEDs are the best options for the monotherapy of focal epilepsy. Is carbamazepine (CBZ), which is considered the standard treatment for focal epilepsy, still the best option for monotherapy of focal epilepsy, despite the emergence of new AEDs? In this systematic review, we compared the relative tolerability of all available AEDs for monotherapy of all types of epilepsy as well as their efficacy in the monotherapy of focal epilepsy. In addition, we compared CBZ with other AEDs for the monotherapy of focal epilepsy. We performed a search of the MEDLINE/PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) databases for randomized controlled clinical trials. To compare the relative efficacy and tolerability of the AEDs, we performed network meta-analyses using a Bayesian random-effects model. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to determine the robustness of the results. A total of 65 studies were included in this review, composing 16,025 patients. Clobazam, levetiracetam, lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine, sulthiame, topiramate, and valproate had the best efficacy profiles and demonstrated no evidence of superiority or inferiority compared with CBZ. However, CBZ showed the greatest risk of patient discontinuation due to intolerable adverse reactions, whereas lamotrigine had the best safety profile and an 81% probability of being the best for the tolerability outcome of patient withdrawals from the study due to intolerable adverse reactions, followed by sulthiame (60%) and clobazam (51%). The newer AEDs-levetiracetam, lamotrigine, oxcarbazepine, sulthiame, and topiramate-should be considered for monotherapy of focal epilepsy because they were demonstrated to be as effective as the older ones (CBZ, clobazam, and valproate) for the treatment of focal epilepsy and were more tolerable. Lamotrigine was the AED with the best tolerability profile, suggesting that it may be the best option for the treatment of focal epilepsy in children and adults.