Acneiform eruptions with combination targeted cancer therapy in colorectal cancer patients.

PURPOSE: Epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors (EGFRI) can be used with pathway inhibitors, including mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase inhibitors (MEKIs), BRAF inhibitors (BRAFIs), and checkpoint inhibitors such as programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) and programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) to treat colorectal cancer. These can precipitate treatment-resistant acneiform eruptions, prompting dose modification or discontinuation. Predicting the likelihood of severe rash development and crafting effective treatments may promote adherence to life-saving chemotherapy. METHODS: An Institutional Review Board-approved retrospective chart review of patients with colorectal cancer treated with EGFRI or MEKI in combination with HER2, BRAF, PI3K, or checkpoint inhibitors between January 1, 2016, and January 1, 2020, was performed. Surrogates for rash severity were investigated, including lower extremity involvement, utilization of oral steroids or retinoids, dose modification, and incidence of superinfection. RESULTS: Of 122 patients treated with combination therapy, 105 developed a rash, and 87 developed an acneiform eruption. Common combinations included MEKI/PD-LI, EGFRI/MEKI, and MEKI/PD-1I. Patients treated with EGFRI/MEKI developed the most severe rashes (p = 0.02). Lower extremity involvement was more frequent with EGFRI/MEKI compared to alternative combinations (p = 0.05). Drug holiday correlated with all rash severity surrogates, including rash grade, lower extremity involvement, oral steroid or retinoid use, and incidence of superinfection. Use of oral steroids or retinoids was associated with development of superinfection (p = 0.002). Prophylactic tetracycline use did not impact rash severity or rash incidence. CONCLUSION: This is the first descriptive analysis to characterize acneiform eruptions for patients with colorectal cancer on combination cancer therapy. Approximately 85% of patients developed a cutaneous toxicity with what appears to be synergistic effects of EGFRI and MEKI combination therapy causing the most severe eruptions. Superinfection rate correlated to systemic therapy use beyond oral tetracyclines. Further investigation into the utility of prophylactic oral tetracyclines in this population is needed.

Prevention and management of acneiform rash associated with EGFR inhibitor therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors are established therapies for advanced lung, colorectal, and head and neck cancers. They commonly cause acneiform eruptions that affect patient quality of life and may lead to discontinuation of therapy. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis was undertaken to assess strategies for the prevention and reactive management of acneiform rash associated with EGFR inhibitor therapy for advanced lung, colorectal, and head and neck cancers. A systematic Medline, Embase, and EBM Reviews database search was conducted on the 2nd of January 2021. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses statement was followed and the studies were critically appraised. Studies were selected if they focused on preventing or treating acneiform eruptions in adults being treated for advanced lung cancer, colorectal cancer, and head and neck cancers with EGFR inhibitors. RESULTS: Oral antibiotics had the greatest efficacy in preventing grade 2 or higher acneiform eruptions with a relative risk reduction of 40% (RR = .6, 95% CI .46-.79, p < .01). Other treatment modalities did not have statistically significant results. Topical antibiotics had a total relative risk reduction of 19% (RR = .81, 95% CI .45-1.48, p = .5). Vitamin K1 cream did not reduce the relative risk (RR = 1.08, 95% CI .45-1.48, p = .50). Sunscreen had a total relative risk reduction of 25% (RR = .75, 95% CI .49-1.14, p = .18). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this meta-analysis reinforce the fact that oral tetracycline antibiotics are the most efficacious prophylactic option for acneiform eruptions in EGFR inhibitors. They should be offered to suitable patients commencing treatment and used with a general skin-care routine involving emollients and avoidance of irritants.

Topical corticosteroid therapy for facial acneiform eruption due to EGFR inhibitors in metastatic colorectal cancer patients: a randomized controlled trial comparing starting with a very strong or a weak topical corticosteroid (FAEISS study, NCCH1512, colorectal part).

BACKGROUND: Although pre-emptive therapy with oral tetracycline, moisturizer, sunscreen, and topical corticosteroid is useful for preventing acneiform eruption (AfE) due to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors, no studies have examined the efficacy of topical corticosteroids themselves, or investigated the optimal potency of corticosteroid for treating facial AfE (FAfE). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Screened patients with RAS wild-type colorectal cancer started pre-emptive therapy with oral minocycline and moisturizer on initiation of cetuximab or panitumumab therapy. Patients who developed grade 1 or 2 FAfE were randomly allocated to two groups: a ranking-down (RD) group that started with a very strong corticosteroid and serially ranked down every 2 weeks unless FAfE exacerbated; and a ranking-up (RU) group that started with a weak corticosteroid and serially ranked up at exacerbation. FAfE grade, patient quality of life, and adverse events (AEs) with topical corticosteroid were evaluated every 2 weeks. The primary endpoint was the total number of times grade 2 or higher FAfE was identified in the central review of the 8-week treatment period. RESULTS: No significant differences in total numbers of grade 2 or higher FAfE or in AEs caused by topical corticosteroids were observed between groups during the 8 weeks. Incidence of grade 2 or higher FAfE tended to be lower in the RD group during the first 2 weeks. CONCLUSION: Considering the long-term care of FAfE, the RU regimen appears suitable and should be considered the standard treatment for FAfE due to EGFR inhibitor therapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000024113).

Reducing Skin Toxicities from EGFR Inhibitors with Topical BRAF Inhibitor Therapy.

Treatment of cancer with EGFR inhibitors is limited by on-target skin toxicities induced by inhibition of the MAPK pathway. BRAF inhibitors are known to paradoxically activate the MAPK downstream of EGFR, which we confirmed using human skin keratinocytes. We then conducted a phase I clinical trial testing the hypothesis that topical therapy with the BRAF inhibitor LUT014 could improve skin toxicities induced by EGFR inhibitors. Ten patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who had developed acneiform rash while being treated with cetuximab or panitumumab were enrolled in three cohorts. LUT014 was well tolerated, and there were no dose-limiting toxicities. The acneiform rash improved in the 6 patients who started with grade 2 rash in the low and intermediate cohorts. We conclude that topical LUT014 is safe and efficacious in improving rash from EGFR inhibitors, consistent with the mechanism of action inducting paradoxical MAPK activation. SIGNIFICANCE: BRAF inhibitor topical therapy could avoid dose reductions of EGFR inhibitors, locally treating the main dose-limiting skin toxicity of this class of agents.This article is highlighted in the In This Issue feature, p. 2113.

Evaluation of EGFR inhibitor-mediated acneiform skin toxicity within the double-blind randomized EVITA trial: A thorough gender-specific analysis using the WoMo score.

Acne-like skin reactions frequently occur in patients undergoing treatment with drugs inhibiting the epidermal growth factor receptor. Recently, the effects of vitamin K1 containing cream (Reconval K1) as prophylactic skin treatment in addition to doxycycline were explored in a double-blind randomized phase II trial (EVITA) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer receiving cetuximab. EVITA demonstrated a trend towards less severe skin rash in Reconval K1-treated patients using the tripartite WoMo skin reaction grading score as a thorough tool for quantification of drug related skin reactions. This gender-specific analysis of the EVITA trial evaluated the application of the WoMo score for assessment of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-related skin toxicities according to treatment arm and gender. To show the robustness of results parametric and non-parametric statistical analyses were conducted. All three parts of the WoMo score independently demonstrated the superiority of the treatment arm (Reconval K1) regarding a significant reduction in acneiform skin reactions in women. Men did not benefit from Reconval K1 cream at any time point in none of the WoMo score analyses. The treatment effect in women was confirmed by the use of skin rash categories based on the final WoMo overall score and mixed effect longitudinal multiple linear regression analysis. The WoMo score represents a sensitive tool for studies exploiting treatments against EGFR mediated acne-like skin rash. Part C of the WoMo score seems to be sufficient for quantification of drug related skin toxicities in further studies. Standard WoMo skin reaction score values for future studies are provided.

Topical doxycycline foam 4% for prophylactic management of epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor skin toxicity: an exploratory phase 2, randomized, double-blind clinical study.

PURPOSE: Acneiform rash, a common toxicity of epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors (EGFRIs), can cause patient discomfort, warranting changes in treatment. This study investigated the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of a novel doxycycline foam, FDX104 4%, for managing EGFRI-related skin toxicity. METHODS: This was an exploratory phase 2, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Subjects had metastatic colorectal cancer and were being treated with either cetuximab or panitumumab plus chemotherapy. Treatment (twice-daily topical FDX104 4% on one side of the face and vehicle foam on the other for 5 weeks) was initiated 7 ± 3 days prior to EGFRI therapy. Rash severity, safety, and tolerability were evaluated at 2 and 4 weeks after EGFRI start. RESULTS: The mean maximal rash grade was lower with FDX104 4% vs vehicle, and fewer subjects developed moderate-to-severe (grades 2-3) rash. On the Global Severity Score scale, a statistically significant difference favored FDX104 4% over vehicle (P = .047). Adverse events (AEs) (n = 68) occurred in 20 subjects; most were mild or moderate. The most common AEs were oral mucositis, nausea, and vomiting, common to chemotherapy and EGFRI treatment. Study-drug-related AEs were experienced by five subjects and consisted of mild, local skin reactions. No study-drug-related systemic side effects were reported. CONCLUSION: Twice-daily, topical administration of FDX104 4% as an adjunct to either cetuximab or panitumumab was safe and well tolerated, and appeared to prevent the onset of rash, especially severe rash. CLINICALTRIALS. GOV IDENTIFIER: Trial Registration NCT02239731.

Prophylactic versus reactive treatment of acneiform skin rashes from epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors in metastatic colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: There are concerns regarding potential negative effects of prophylactic treatment of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-inhibitor-related rashes on metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) outcomes. We aimed to characterize treatment patterns of EGFR-inhibitor-induced rashes and evaluate prophylactic versus reactive approaches to rash management in relation to overall survival (OS). METHODS: Patients diagnosed with KRAS wild-type mCRC from July 2010 to June 2012 in British Columbia and prescribed cetuximab or panitumumab were reviewed to describe patterns of use of oral antibiotics and steroid creams. Using Cox regression, the relationship between prophylactic versus reactive rash management and OS was characterized. RESULTS: A total 119 patients were analyzed: median age was 63 years, 61 % were male, 34 % received cetuximab, 66 % received panitumumab, and median number of EGFR inhibitor treatment was nine cycles. Rash occurred in >90 % of patients, and reactive was favored over prophylactic treatment (66 vs. 34 %). Older patients and those with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0/1 were more likely to receive prophylactic creams (44 vs. 20 % for age <60, p = 0.01) and oral antibiotics (62 vs. 12 % for ECOG ≥2, p = 0.01), respectively. Median OS was 7.0 months. The number of treatment cycles and OS were similar in both prophylactic and reactive groups (both p > 0.05). In Cox regression, ECOG >2 correlated with worse survival (hazard ratio (HR) 22.01, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 5.25-92.30, p < 0.01). However, survival outcomes were similar between patients prescribed antibiotics prophylactically versus reactively (HR = 1.10, 95 % CI 0.43-2.80, p = 0.85), and steroid creams prophylactically versus reactively (HR = 2.00, 95 % CI 0.58-6.92, p = 0.27). CONCLUSION: Prophylactic treatment of EGFR-inhibitor-related rashes is associated with similar outcomes compared to reactive rash treatment in mCRC.

Prophylactic Effect of Oral Minocycline in Combination with Topical Steroid and Skin Care Against Panitumumab-induced Acneiform Rash in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients.

BACKGROUND: Although the anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody panitumumab is effective in treating colorectal cancer, the occurrence of severe skin disorders often discontinues therapy. Herein, we investigated by a retrospective chart review the effect of prophylactic oral minocycline in combination with skin treatment using moisturizer on the incidence of skin disorders and tumor response in metastatic colorectal cancer patients who received panitumumab. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a total of 55 patients, 38 patients were eligible, consisting the pre-emptive group (N=25) and reactive group (N=13). Acneiform rash and other adverse events were graded according to the CTCAE v4.0. RESULTS: The occurrence of acneiform rash (grade ≥2) was significantly lower in pre-emptive group than in reactive group (44.0% vs. 84.6%, p=0.04). No significant differences in the occurrence of other adverse events were observed between the two groups. Tumor response was not significantly different between the two groups (36.0% vs. 7.7%, OR, 6.75; 95% confidence interval (CI)=0.75-60.76, p=0.12). Mean time to treatment failure was 149.7 days and 110.2 days in the pre-emptive group and reactive treatment group, respectively (HR=0.58; 95% CI= 0.26-1.28, p=0.18). CONCLUSION: Prophylactic oral minocycline combined with skin care reduced panitumumab-induced acneiform rash without a significant influence on tumor response.

Efficacy of prophylactic minocycline treatment for skin toxicities induced by erlotinib plus gemcitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Erlotinib has been reported as being associated with a high incidence of skin toxicities such as acneiform rash, paronychia, and xerosis. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of prophylactic minocycline treatment for the skin toxicities induced by erlotinib as compared with deferred minocycline treatment in patients with pancreatic cancer treated with erlotinib plus gemcitabine. METHODS: A total of 96 patients were studied retrospectively, of whom 44 received prophylactic minocycline between August 2012 and June 2013 and 52 received deferred minocycline treatment between August 2011 and July 2012 at the National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan. In the prophylactic minocycline group, 200 mg/day oral minocycline was prophylactically administered during the treatment period. RESULTS: The incidence rate of acneiform rash and xerosis of any grade during the first 6 weeks of treatment was significantly reduced in the prophylactic minocycline group compared with the deferred minocycline treatment group (47.7 vs. 80.8%, p<0.001; 2.3 vs. 19.2%, p=0.01). Multivariate analysis identified prophylactic minocycline as a significant independent factor associated with the incidence of acneiform rash and xerosis of any severity (odds ratio [OR] 0.16, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.06-0.46, p<0.001; OR 0.11, 95% CI 0.01-0.90, p=0.04). CONCLUSION: Prophylactic minocycline appears to be useful for the management of erlotinib-related acneiform rash and xerosis during chemotherapy in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer.

Topical vitamin K1 may not be effective in preventing acneiform rash during cetuximab treatment in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Several studies have described the efficacy of topical vitamin K1 cream in the prevention and treatment of acneiform rash during cetuximab treatment. OBJECTIVES: An interventional study with a historical control was conducted to investigate the efficacy of vitamin K1 cream for acneiform rash associated with cetuximab. METHODS: For the historical control, data were collected from 40 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who had participated in a previous clinical trial of cetuximab plus irinotecan. The experimental group consisted of 61 patients who were instructed to prophylactically apply topical vitamin K1 cream beginning on the first day of cetuximab treatment. The incidence, severity, and time to occurrence of acneiform rash were compared between groups. RESULTS: The incidence of grade≥2 acneiform rash after 4 weeks of cetuximab treatment was 42.5% in the historical control group and 55.5% in the experimental group. The median time to grade≥2 rash in the experimental group was 4 weeks compared to 6 weeks in the historical control group (p=0.340). By multivariate analysis, male gender was the only independent risk factor for grade 2 or worse acneiform rash (HR=2.49; 95% CI, 1.27-4.88; p=0.007). Prophylactic application of topical vitamin K1 cream did not decrease the risk of acneiform rash (HR=1.33; 95% CI, 0.57-3.10; p=0.507). CONCLUSIONS: The prophylactic application of topical vitamin K1 cream did not translate into clinically meaningful benefit in terms of reducing acneiform rash in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer treated with cetuximab.

Description and management of cutaneous side effects during erlotinib and cetuximab treatment in lung and colorectal cancer patients: a prospective and descriptive study of 19 patients.

Erlotinib and cetuximab are human epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors (EGFRI) that are approved in monotherapy for the treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer after failure of at least one prior chemotherapy regimen. Papulopustular eruptions are the most frequent adverse effect, their occurrence being associated with increased survival in some studies. We describe 19 patients who presented with a rash located mainly to the face and trunk, without presence of comedones, shortly after initiation of EGFRI therapy. We present our algorithm to manage these patients and their respective responses. We also report other therapeutic options and cutaneous alterations that may be seen.

[Eruptive xanthomas with hypertriglyceridemia]. / Eruptive Xanthome bei Hypertriglyzeridämie.

Eruptive xanthomas are often associated with elevated plasma levels of triglyceride-rich lipoproteins and may be a marker for occult hyperlipidemia, diabetes mellitus or pancreatitis. A 42-year-old woman presented with the acute onset of disseminated eruptive xanthomas secondary to hyperlipidemia associated with diabetes and concomitant acute pancreatitis. She improved after optimized insulin therapy and intensified treatment of hyperlipidemia. Eruptive xanthomas should be diagnosed early and lead to further metabolic evaluations.

Randomized double-blind trial of prophylactic oral minocycline and topical tazarotene for cetuximab-associated acne-like eruption.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the ability of either oral minocycline, topical tazarotene or both, to reduce or prevent cetuximab-related acneiform rash when administered starting on day 1 of cetuximab therapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Metastatic colorectal cancer patients preparing to initiate cetuximab were randomly assigned to receive daily oral minocycline or placebo, and to receive topical tazarotene application to either left or right side of the face. Both therapies were administered for 8 weeks. RESULTS: Forty-eight eligible patients were randomly assigned to minocycline (n = 24) or placebo (n = 24). Total facial lesion counts were significantly lower in patients receiving minocycline at weeks 1 through 4. At week 4, a lower proportion of patients in the minocycline arm reported moderate to severe itch than in the placebo arm (20% v 50%, P = .05). Facial photographs, obtained at week 4, were reviewed for rash global severity. Patients in the minocycline arm trended toward lower frequency of moderate to severe rash than patients receiving placebo (20% v 42%, P = .13). The differences in total facial lesion counts and subjectively assessed itch were diminished by week 8. Cetuximab treatment was interrupted because of grade 3 skin rash in four patients in the placebo arm, and none in the minocycline arm. There was no observed clinical benefit to tazarotene application. Tazarotene treatment was associated with significant irritation, causing its discontinuation in one third of patients. CONCLUSION: Prophylaxis with oral minocycline may be useful in decreasing the severity of the acneiform rash during the first month of cetuximab treatment. Topical tazarotene is not recommended for management of cetuximab-related rash.

Common side effects of anti-EGFR therapy: acneform rash.

OBJECTIVES: To review the general toxicity profile of EGFR-targeted therapies and the management of the most common side effect, skin toxicity. DATA SOURCES: Research articles. CONCLUSION: The most common side effect of anti-EGFR therapy is skin toxicity, which is generally mild to moderate, but may be severe in up to 18% of patients. Appearance of more severe rash has been correlated with better treatment outcomes. Skin toxicity is generally manageable with standard topical or systemic antibiotics and anti-inflammatory agents. Rash does not warrant treatment discontinuation; however, when using TKIs, the combination of rash and severe diarrhea may require treatment cessation. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE: Patients and nurses need to be well informed about the expected side effects of anti-EGFR therapy and appropriate management techniques. Patient education prior to beginning therapy and proactive intervention at the first signs of skin toxicity are key to successful management.