Efficacy of intrathecal mesenchymal stem cell-neural progenitor therapy in progressive MS: results from a phase II, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Mesenchymal stem cell-neural progenitors (MSC-NPs) are a bone marrow mesenchymal stem cell (MSC)-derived ex vivo manipulated cell product with therapeutic potential in multiple sclerosis (MS). The objective of this study was to determine efficacy of intrathecal (IT) MSC-NP treatment in patients with progressive MS. METHODS: The study is a phase II randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial with a compassionate crossover design conducted at a single site. Subjects were stratified according to baseline Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) (3.0-6.5) and disease subtype (secondary or primary progressive MS) and randomized into either treatment or placebo group to receive six IT injections of autologous MSC-NPs or saline every two months. The primary outcome was EDSS Plus, defined by improvement in EDSS, timed 25-foot walk (T25FW) or nine-hole peg test. Secondary outcomes included the individual components of EDSS Plus, the six-minute walk test (6MWT), urodynamics testing, and brain atrophy measurement. RESULTS: Subjects were randomized into MSC-NP (n = 27) or saline (n = 27) groups. There was no difference in EDSS Plus improvement between the MSC-NP (33%) and saline (37%) groups. Exploratory subgroup analysis demonstrated that in subjects who require assistance for ambulation (EDSS 6.0-6.5) there was a significantly higher percentage of improvement in T25FW and 6MWT in the MSC-NP group (3.7% ± 23.1% and - 9.2% ± 18.2%) compared to the saline group (-54.4% ± 70.5% and - 32.1% ± 30.0%), (p = 0.030 and p = 0.036, respectively). IT-MSC-NP treatment was also associated with improved bladder function and reduced rate of grey matter atrophy on brain MRI. Biomarker analysis demonstrated increased MMP9 and decreased CCL2 levels in the cerebrospinal fluid following treatment. CONCLUSION: Results from exploratory outcomes suggest that IT-MSC-NP treatment may be associated with a therapeutic response in a subgroup of MS patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03355365, registered November 14, 2017, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03355365?term=NCT03355365&rank=1 .

Effects of Dietary Modification Based on Complementary and Alternative Iranian Medicine in Patients with Secondary-Progressive Multiple Sclerosis: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

Objectives: To evaluate the efficacy of dietary modifications based on complementary and alternative Iranian medicine (CAIM) in patients with secondary-progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS). Design: In this randomized controlled trial, 70 SPMS patients were randomized to receive either a moderate-nature diet based on Persian medicine (as intervention) or usual diet plus health-related diet recommendations (as control) for 2 months. Serum high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS), State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), Global Pain Scale (GPS), Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS), anthropometric measurements, and quality of life (QOL) were assessed at baseline and end of trial. Analysis of covariance was performed, and the results were adjusted for potential confounders using SPSS v.14. Results: All participants completed the study for 2 months. There were significant improvements across the mean changes of hs-CRP (-0.1 ± 0.2 mg/L for intervention vs. -0.01 ± 0.13 mg/L for control; padjusted = 0.012), MFIS (-11.0 ± 11.8 vs. -0.7 ± 9.9; padjusted <0.001), GSRS (-19.9 ± 16.3 to 1.2 ± 17.5; padjusted <0.001), GPS (padjusted = 0.032), and QOL (padjusted <0.05). No significant difference was observed across the ESR, EDSS, STAI, and anthropometric measurements. Conclusion: Dietary modifications based on CAIM may improve inflammation and clinical manifestations in SPMS patients. Nonetheless, further trials are required to confirm these findings. Clinical Trial Registration: IRCT20181113041641N2.

Improvements in one severe progressive multiple sclerosis patient quality of life after an intensity fluid dynamic treatment.

Clinical case: A 49-year-old man (MM72) affected by Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis (SP-MS) since 1998. On last 3 years, neurologists valued 9.0 the patient MM72's EDSS. Methods: MM72 was treated by acoustic waves, modulated in frequency and power by the MAM device, according to an ambulatory intensive protocol. Patient's treatments schedule was organized in thirty cycles of DrenoMAM and AcuMAM, and manual cervical spinal adjustments. Before and after treatments, MSIS-29, Barthel, FIM, EDSS, ESS, and FSS questionnaires were administered to the patient. Results: MM72 patient had improvements in all index score (MSIS-29, Barthel, FIM, EDSS, ESS and FSS) after 30 treatments by MAM plus cervical spine chiropractic adjustments. He showed a significative improvement of his disability and the restore of many functions. After MAM treatments, MM72's cognitive sphere improved of 370%. Fur-thermore, after 5 years of paraplegy, he regained his lower limbs and feet fingers movements with an increase of 230%. Conclusion: We suggest ambulatory intensive treatments by fluid dynamic MAM protocol in SP-MS patients. Statistical analyses are in progress on a larger sample of SP-MS patients.

Cycling in primary progressive multiple sclerosis (CYPRO): study protocol for a randomized controlled superiority trial evaluating the effects of high-intensity interval training in persons with primary progressive multiple sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: Primary progressive multiple sclerosis (PPMS) is the least prevalent multiple sclerosis (MS) phenotype. For persons with PPMS (pwPPMS), pharmacological treatment options are limited. As a complementary non-pharmacological treatment, endurance training improves the health-related quality of life (HRQoL), numerous MS symptoms, and MS-related performance impediments. High-intensity interval training (HIIT) has been shown to induce superior effects compared to moderate-intensity continuous training (MCT). As current evidence is based on MS samples with mixed phenotypes, generalizability to pwPPMS remains unclear. METHODS: CYPRO is a parallel-group, single-center, and single-blind randomized controlled superiority trial evaluating the effects of HIIT compared to MCT in pwPPMS. Sixty-one pwPPMS are randomized (1:1) to perform volume-matched HIIT or MCT sessions on bicycle ergometers two to three times per week in addition to standard rehabilitative care during their three-week inpatient stay at Valens rehabilitation clinic, Switzerland. Standard rehabilitative care comprises endurance and strength training, physiotherapy, and occupational therapy. HIIT sessions include six 90-second intervals at 95% peak heart rate (HRpeak), interspersed by 90-second active breaks with unloaded pedaling, aimed to reach 60%HRpeak. MCT represents the standard treatment at Valens rehabilitation clinic and is performed as continuous cycling at 60%HRpeak for the duration of 26 minutes. The primary outcome is cardiorespiratory fitness, assessed as peak oxygen consumption (V̇O2peak) during cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET). Secondary outcomes include peak power output during CPET, walking capacity, cognitive performance, HRQoL, fatigue, anxiety and depressive symptoms, and blood-derived biomarkers (e.g., serum neurofilament light chain, glial fibrillary acidic protein, kynurenine pathway metabolites) related to MS pathophysiology. All outcomes are assessed at baseline and discharge after three weeks. Venous blood sampling is additionally performed immediately and two hours after the first HIIT or MCT session. DISCUSSION: CYPRO will expand current knowledge on symptom management and rehabilitation in MS to the subpopulation of pwPPMS, and will contribute to the exploration of potential disease-modifying effects of endurance training in MS. The superiority design of CYPRO will allow deriving explicit recommendations on endurance training design in pwPPMS that can be readily translated into clinical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: CYPRO has been prospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov on 8 February 2022 (NCT05229861).

Impact of a specific consultation for patients with progressive forms of multiple sclerosis on the response to their unmet care needs: a cross-sectional study.

BACKGROUND: As their disease evolves, most patients with progressive forms of multiple sclerosis (MS) develop particular healthcare needs that are not always addressed with usual follow-up. To adapt neurological care to these patients, we created a specific consultation for patients with progressive MS in our centre in 2019. OBJECTIVES: To explore the main unmet care needs of patients with progressive MS in our setting, and to establish the usefulness of the specific consultation to address them. METHODS: Literature review and interviews with patients and healthcare professionals were conducted to identify the main unmet needs in routine follow-up. Two questionnaires were developed, assessing the importance of the unmet needs identified and the usefulness of the consultation to meet them, for patients under follow-up in the specific consultation and their informal caregivers. RESULTS: Forty-one patients and nineteen informal caregivers participated. The most important unmet needs were the information about the disease, access to social services and coordination between specialists. A positive correlation was found between the importance of these unmet needs and the responsiveness to each of them in the specific consultation. CONCLUSIONS: The creation of a specific consultation may improve attention to the healthcare needs of patients with progressive MS.

Repair what is lost: Neuroprotection through neural stem cells in progressive MS.

Genchi et al.1 report the first phase 1 trial of neural stem cell transplantation in multiple sclerosis showing a reduction in gray matter atrophy. Results give hope for a new era of induced neuroprotection, especially in progressive multiple sclerosis.

Diagnosis and treatment of progressive multiple sclerosis: A position paper.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an unpredictable disease characterised by a highly variable disease onset and clinical course. Three main clinical phenotypes have been described. However, distinguishing between the two progressive forms of MS can be challenging for clinicians. This article examines how the diagnostic definitions of progressive MS impact clinical research, the design of clinical trials and, ultimately, treatment decisions. METHODS: We carried out an extensive review of the literature highlighting differences in the definition of progressive forms of MS, and the importance of assessing the extent of the ongoing inflammatory component in MS when making treatment decisions. RESULTS: Inconsistent results in phase III clinical studies of treatments for progressive MS, may be attributable to differences in patient characteristics (e.g., age, clinical and radiological activity at baseline) and endpoint definitions. In both primary and secondary progressive MS, patients who are younger and have more active disease will derive the greatest benefit from the available treatments. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend making treatment decisions based on the individual patient's pattern of disease progression, as well as functional, clinical and imaging parameters, rather than on their clinical phenotype. Because the definition of progressive MS differs across clinical studies, careful selection of eligibility criteria and study endpoints is needed for future studies in patients with progressive MS.

Evaluation of neurotrophic factor secreting mesenchymal stem cells in progressive multiple sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: Autologous mesenchymal stem cell neurotrophic factor-secreting cells (NurOwn®) have the potential to modify underlying disease mechanisms in progressive multiple sclerosis (PMS). OBJECTIVE: This open-label phase II study was conducted to evaluate safety/efficacy of three intrathecal cell treatments. METHODS: Eighteen participants with non-relapsing PMS were treated. The primary endpoint was safety. Secondary endpoints included: cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) biomarkers; timed 25-foot walk speed, nine-hole peg test (9-HPT), low-contrast letter acuity, symbol digit modalities test, and 12-item multiple sclerosis (MS) walking scale. Seventeen participants received all treatments. RESULTS: No deaths/adverse events related to worsening of MS, clinical/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evidence of disease activation, and clinically significant changes in safety lab results were reported. Two participants developed symptoms of low back and leg pain, consistent with a diagnosis of arachnoiditis, occurring in one of three intrathecal treatments in both participants. Nineteen percent of treated participants achieved pre-specified ⩾ 25% improvements in timed 25-foot walk speed/nine-HPT at 28 weeks compared to baseline, along with consistent efficacy signals for pre-specified response criteria across other secondary efficacy outcomes. CSF neuroprotective factors increased, and inflammatory biomarkers decreased after treatment, consistent with the proposed mechanism of action. CONCLUSION: Based on these encouraging preliminary findings, further confirmation in a randomized study is warranted.

Multiple transplantation of mesenchymal stem cells in a patient with active progressive multiple sclerosis: Long term therapeutic outcomes.

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is one of the most common idiopathic inflammatory demyelinating disease. One of the challenges in the treatment of MS is how to overcome relapses without severe adverse effects. Due to their immunoregulatory properties and safety, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), present a potential alternative for treatment for MS. The efficacy and safety of a long-term MSCs therapy in MS remain to be established. In this communication, we report the clinical condition and disease progression of an MS patient treated for 11 years, with multiple infusions of MSCs derived from either his bone marrow (BM), pooled human umbilical cords (UC), or from his own child umbilical cord. A male patient diagnosed as progressive MS (EDSS score 3) was enrolled into our study and received 1 × 106 cells/kg of MSCs, at least once a year for 9 years. The MSCs treatment was well tolerated with no significant side effects. Following the transplantation of MSCs, the overall EDSS scores of the patient decreased over the 10 years period of observation. MRI investigation did not reveal any new lesions. However, upon the cessation of the MSCs treatment, the EDSS score increased from 1.0 to 3.5, further supporting the notion that in such a patient, the transplantation of MSCs, had a significant beneficial effect. This case study is the first to report on the beneficial effects of multiple infusions of BM-MSC and umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells (UC-MSCs) in a progressive MS patient, over a period of 11 years, in absence of any other treatments. Hence, multiple infusions of MSCs may provide a novel therapeutic avenue for patients with aggressive MS.

Self-assessment of people with relapsing-remitting and progressive multiple sclerosis towards burden of disease, progression, and treatment utilization-Results of a large-scale cross-sectional online survey (MS Perspectives).

BACKGROUND: Assessment of the disease course by people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) themselves is important for a better understanding of the complex disease, patient counseling and treatment decisions. This may also facilitate identifying the often-unnoticed transition from relapsing-remitting (RRMS) to secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS). OBJECTIVE: MS Perspectives was designed to collect data on patients' self-assessment of multiple sclerosis (MS) symptoms, relapse-independent progression, and impact on everyday life. METHODS: MS Perspectives is a cross-sectional online survey conducted among adult pwMS in Germany. The questionnaire included 36 items on sociodemographic and clinical characteristics as well as pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment. RESULTS: In total, 4555 pwMS completed the survey between December 2021 and February 2022, 69.2% had RRMS, 15.1% had SPMS. Relapse-independent worsening of symptoms was reported by 88.9% of RRMS patients with marked to severe and by 61.8% with no or mild to moderate disability. Problems with walking were most frequently (32.1%) mentioned as most bothersome by RRMS patients with marked to severe disability, fatigue, and cognitive impairment by RRMS patients with no or mild to moderate disability. CONCLUSION: MS Perspectives gives an important insight in the self-assessed disease course and impact on daily life in a large-scale cohort of pwMS.

Interrogating large multiple sclerosis registries and databases: what information can be gained?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Although substantial progress has been made in understanding the natural history of multiple sclerosis (MS) and the development of new therapies, many questions concerning disease behavior and therapeutics remain to be answered. Data generated from real-world observational studies, based on large MS registries and databases and analyzed with advanced statistical methods, are offering the scientific community answers to some of these questions that are otherwise difficult or impossible to address. This review focuses on observational studies published in the last 2 years designed to compare the effectiveness of escalation vs. induction treatment strategies, to assess the effectiveness of treatment in pediatric-onset and late-onset MS, and to identify the clinical phenotype of secondary progressive (SP)MS. RECENT FINDINGS: The main findings originating from real-world studies suggest that MS patients who will qualify for high-efficacy disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) should be offered these as early as possible to prevent irreversible accumulation of neurological disability. Especially pediatric patients derive substantial benefits from early treatment. In patients with late-onset MS, sustained exposure to DMTs may result in more favorable outcomes. Data-driven definitions are more accurate in defining transition to SPMS than diagnosis based solely on neurologists' judgment. SUMMARY: Patients, physicians, industry, and policy-makers have all benefited from real-world evidence based on registry data, in answering questions of diagnostics, choice of treatment, and timing of treatment decisions.

Effects of Mesenchymal Stem Cell Transplantation on Cerebrospinal Fluid Biomarkers in Progressive Multiple Sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: Neurofilament light chains (NF-L) were shown to serve as a reliable biomarker of neurodegeneration in multiple sclerosis (MS). The chemokine receptor CXCL13 was shown to correlate with CNS inflammatory activity and to predict the future progression of MS. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the levels of NF-L and CXCL13 in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) following treatment with mesenchymal stem cells (MSC) in patients with progressive MS. METHODS: The CSF samples were obtained from 48 patients with progressive MS who participated in a double-blind randomized phase II clinical trial that tested the effects of intrathecal (IT) or intravenous (IV) transplantation of mesenchymal stem cells (MSC), at baseline (before the first injection of the MSC) and at 6 months following treatment with MSC, or sham treatment. The CSF specimens were tested in a blinded way, using a single-molecule array (SIMOA) technique. FINDINGS: The CSF levels of NF-L were significantly lower at 6 months following treatment with MSC-IT when compared with the baseline, pre-treatment measurements (P = .026, Wilcoxon paired test). Nine out of 15 tested patients in the MSC-IT group had a reduction in NF-L levels of more than 50% (median decrease: -4449 pg/mL) when compared with 5/15 in the MSC-IV group (median decrease: -151 pg/mL) and 1/15 in the placebo group (median increase: +2450 pg/mL) (P = .001 for MSC-IT vs. placebo, chi-square test). CXCL13 levels were also reduced at 6 months following MSC-IT treatment but not to a statistically significant level. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate possible neuroprotective effects of MSC transplantation in patients with MS. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02166021.

Diagnosing 'transition' to secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS): A step-by-step approach for clinicians.

Upon the approval of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) for patients with active secondary progressive phase of multiple sclerosis (SPMS), there became an emerging need to prospectively predict and diagnose patients transitioning from the relapsing-remitting to the secondary progressive phase of MS. Whilst several research articles handle the challenges for diagnosing this stage of the disease, a clear step-by-step diagnostic approach remains elusive. This review aims at providing a step-by-step diagnostic approach to patients within 'transitioning' MS based on the currently available research findings and to summarize the gaps in the diagnostic approach and the recommendations for future research in this area of practice.

Mechanism-based criteria to improve therapeutic outcomes in progressive multiple sclerosis.

In contrast to the multiple disease-modifying therapies that are available for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (MS), the therapeutic options for progressive MS (PMS) are limited. Recent advances in our understanding of the neuroimmunology of PMS, including the mechanisms that drive slowly expanding lesions, have fuelled optimism for improved treatment of this condition. In this Review, we highlight the commonly observed neuropathology of PMS and discuss the associated mechanisms of CNS injury. We then apply this knowledge to formulate criteria for therapeutic efficacy in PMS, beginning with the need for early treatment owing to the substantial neuropathology that is already present at the initial clinical presentation. Other requirements include: antagonism of neuroaxonal injury mediators such as pro-inflammatory microglia and lymphocytes; remediation of oxidative stress resulting from iron deposition and mitochondrial dysfunction; and promotion of neuroprotection through remyelination. We consider whether current disease-modifying therapies for relapsing-remitting MS meet the criteria for successful therapeutics in PMS and suggest that the evidence favours the early introduction of sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor modulators. Finally, we weigh up emerging medications, including repurposed generic medications and Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors, against these fundamental criteria. In this new therapeutic era in PMS, success depends collectively on understanding disease mechanisms, drug characteristics (including brain penetration) and rational use.

Characteristics of secondary progressive multiple sclerosis: Disease activity and provision of care in Germany - A registry-based/multicentric cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The tailored immunomodulatory treatment strategy for secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS) depends on disease activity. OBJECTIVE: To assess the real-world situation in monitoring disease activity in SPMS patients and to identify associations of resulting subgroups with demographics, symptomatology, and therapy METHODS: This study included 4,263 SPMS patients from the German MS register (GMSR). For the classification into 'active' and 'inactive' according to relapse activity and MRI findings during the year prior to the latest clinical visit, we used the following definitions: active - gadolinium enhancing (Gd+)/new T2 lesions or ≥1 relapse, inactive - neither Gd+/new T2 lesions nor relapses. The active, inactive, and unclassifiable patients were compared in terms of clinical data, socio-demographics, symptomatology, healthcare, and DMT. RESULTS: Classification was possible for 1,513 (35.5%) SPMS patients, with 467 classified as active and 1,046 as inactive. For the classification, MRI data was available for 33.2% of the 4,263 patients. Higher MRI frequencies were observed for younger patients (OR 1.22 [1.12,1.33] per 10 years) with short disease duration (OR 1.19 [1.09, 1.30] per 10 years) (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: MRI coverage was low, especially in elderly SPMS patients. Roughly one third of the SPMS patients presented markers of disease activity in the last year. Overall, the clinical differences (concerning symptomatology and care) between patients with active and inactive SPMS were small.

Measuring Treatment Response in Progressive Multiple Sclerosis-Considerations for Adapting to an Era of Multiple Treatment Options.

Disability in multiple sclerosis accrues predominantly in the progressive forms of the disease. While disease-modifying treatment of relapsing MS has drastically evolved over the last quarter-century, the development of efficient drugs for preventing or at least delaying disability in progressive MS has proven more challenging. In that way, many drugs (especially disease-modifying treatments) have been researched in the aspect of delaying disability progression in patients with a progressive course of the disease. While there are some disease-modifying treatments approved for progressive multiple sclerosis, their effect is moderate and limited mostly to patients with clinical and/or radiological signs of disease activity. Several phase III trials have used different primary outcomes with different time frames to define disease progression and to evaluate the efficacy of a disease-modifying treatment. The lack of sufficiently sensitive outcome measures could be a possible explanation for the negative clinical trials in progressive multiple sclerosis. On the other hand, even with a potential outcome measure that would be sensitive enough to determine disease progression and, thus, the efficacy or failure of a disease-modifying treatment, the question of clinical relevance remains unanswered. In this systematic review, we analyzed outcome measures and definitions of disease progression in phase III clinical trials in primary and secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. We discuss advantages and disadvantages of clinical and paraclinical outcome measures aiming for practical ways of combining them to detect disability progression more sensitively both in future clinical trials and current clinical routine.

[Controversies in neurology: Diagnosis, follow up and therapy of multiple sclerosis with pathomechanismal approach]. / Ellentmondások a neurológiában: A sclerosis multiplex diagnózisának, követésének és terápiájának aktuális kérdései a patomechanizmus megközelítésével.

The clinical boundaries between the relapsing and progressive course of multiple sclerosis are often indistinct. Despite the variable patterns of evolution, there are no biological reasons for discerning different multiple sclerosis phenotypes. Indeed, both primary progressive and secondary forms of the disease share similar pathological features in respect of the extent of inflammatory infiltrates, axonal damage, and cortical demyelination. The data indicating that primary progressive multiple sclerosis is preceded by an asymptomatic relapsing remitting phase. The proposed definition of secondary progressive multiple slcerosis, the attainment of at least EDSS of 4 is required to mark the transition to the progressive phase. Therefore, the clinical progress can be uncovered in the early phase of the disease. Furthermore, a continuous progression independent of relapsing activity is commonly observed during the relapsing remitting phase. A continuous smouldering process underpins the subtle clinical deterioration, which stands out as an important unmet treatment target. Concerning cognitive dysfunction of the patients pro-inflammatory cytokines have been associated with worse cognition in active multiple sclerosis, and this inflammatory milieu could also contribute to altered mentation during relapses. Therefore, long before people with multiple sclerosis become physically disabled, they have usually acquired hidden disabilities related to cognitive impairment. Silent progression appears during the relapsing remitting phase and it associates with brain atrophy. This suggests that the same process that underlies secondary progressive multiple sclerosis likely begins far earlier than is generally recognized. This supports a unitary view of multiple sclerosis biology.

Results from SPECTRUM: A survey of healthcare professionals to understand current diagnosis and management practices for secondary progressive multiple sclerosis in the United Kingdom.

BACKGROUND: Recognising the transition from relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) to secondary progressive MS (SPMS) in clinical practice can be challenging. With disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) commonly used for RRMS accepted to be less efficacious once progression has occurred, treatment options for progressive forms of MS have been limited. Emergence of new DMTs in SPMS are changing the treatment landscape. There is a need to better understand current practice and the factors underlying it, to facilitate consensus on the overall management of SPMS and optimise diagnostic and management decisions. This survey project aimed to assess current practices for the diagnosis and management of patients with SPMS in the UK. METHODS: Healthcare professionals (HCPs) involved in the management of patients with SPMS from geographically distributed MS neurology centres in the UK participated in face-to-face or telephone interviews, facilitated by a semi-structured questionnaire. The survey data were descriptively analysed using quantitative and qualitative methods. RESULTS: Fifty-nine HCPs (41 neurologists, 15 specialist nurses and 3 'other'), from 59 UK centres took part. Sixty-one percent (n = 36/59) of respondents applied a specific definition for SPMS, although only 6% of these (2/36) used the Lublin 2014 phenotype criteria. Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score increase with an absence of relapses was an important consideration for SPMS diagnosis for 83% (n = 49/59) of respondents, and 36% (n = 21/59) considered this to be the most important piece of evidence that they look for when they suspect a patient is transitioning from RRMS to SPMS. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) estimated time between first suspicion and diagnosis of SPMS was 12 months (12-24 [n = 45/59]), with concerns over withdrawing DMTs and the psychological impact of a diagnosis on patients the most commonly reported reasons for reluctance to diagnose. Seventy-three percent (n = 43/59) of respondents followed specific guidelines for DMT management of patients transitioning from RRMS to SPMS, with most (86%, n = 37/43) using the NHS England algorithm. Ninety-eight percent (n = 58/59) use DMTs to treat patients they suspect may be transitioning to SPMS, and 51% (n = 30/59) reported using DMTs for newly diagnosed SPMS patients. Approximately 1 in 5 HCPs may consider continuing DMTs beyond EDSS 7.0 in certain circumstances. CONCLUSION: The survey highlighted variation across the UK in SPMS definition, diagnosis and reported real-world management. Disparity in practice may result in unnecessary variations in treatment patterns and consequently outcomes. HCPs should be equipped to make timely and accurate decisions, which will be important in improving access to appropriate therapies for patients with SPMS.

Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation in Active Multiple Sclerosis: A Real-world Case Series.

OBJECTIVE: To examine outcomes in people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) treated with autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) in a real-world setting. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of PwMS treated with AHSCT at 2 centers in London, UK, consecutively between 2012 and 2019 who had ≥6 months of follow-up or died at any time. Primary outcomes were survival free of multiple sclerosis (MS) relapses, MRI new lesions, and worsening of Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score. Adverse events rates were also examined. RESULTS: The cohort includes 120 PwMS; 52% had progressive MS (primary or secondary) and 48% had relapsing-remitting MS. At baseline, the median EDSS score was 6.0; 90% of the evaluable cases showed MRI activity in the 12 months preceding AHSCT. Median follow-up after AHSCT was 21 months (range 6-85 months). MS relapse-free survival was 93% at 2 years and 87% at 4 years after AHSCT. No new MRI lesions were detected in 90% of participants at 2 years and in 85% at 4 years. EDSS score progression-free survival (PFS) was 75% at 2 years and 65% at 4 years. Epstein-Barr virus reactivation and monoclonal paraproteinemia were associated with worse PFS. There were 3 transplantation-related deaths within 100 days (2.5%), all after fluid overload and cardiac or respiratory failure. CONCLUSIONS: Efficacy outcomes of AHSCT in this real-world cohort are similar to those reported in more stringently selected clinical trial populations, although the risks may be higher. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study is rated Class IV because of the uncontrolled, open-label design.