Dilip's Transmucosal Internal Sphincterotomy: A Simplified Approach to Lateral Internal Sphincterotomy for Fissure in Ano.

BACKGROUND: Fissure in ano is a prevalent and painful condition, typically treated by lateral internal sphincterotomy after conservative measures fail. Dilip's transmucosal internal sphincterotomy introduces a simplified approach that reduces the risk of damaging the external sphincter, making it particularly suitable for less experienced surgeons. This innovation offers a less invasive method with minimal risk of incontinence, providing a safer, more accessible option. IMPACT OF INNOVATION: Transmucosal internal sphincterotomy simplifies the internal sphincterotomy process, offering a tailored approach that eliminates the need for extensive dissection. This method allows surgeons complete control over the internal sphincter bundle, facilitating a precise, customizable cut without the risks associated with traditional internal sphincterotomy, especially in obese patients where the intersphincteric groove is not visible, leading to potentially harmful blind incisions. TECHNOLOGY, MATERIALS, AND METHODS: The procedure is performed under saddle block anesthesia with the patient in the lithotomy position. A distinctive approach involving the use of retractors and stay sutures allows the internal sphincter to be made prominent and secured without extensive dissection. The division of the internal sphincter is achieved through a minimal mucosal incision, requiring no closure and significantly reducing postoperative pain and complications. PRELIMINARY RESULTS: Between December 2020 and February 2022, 124 patients received transmucosal internal sphincterotomy, showing significant benefits with a median operative time of 7 minutes and low postoperative pain. With a 2.5% infection rate effectively managed and a 3% transient incontinence rate, the majority healed within 9 weeks. Recurrence was rare at 1.6%. CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS: Transmucosal internal sphincterotomy presents significant advantages over traditional internal sphincterotomy, including reduced pain, lower risk of complications, such as hematoma, abscess, or fistula formation, and the absence of painful postoperative nodules. The success of transmucosal internal sphincterotomy suggests that it should be incorporated into surgical education, offering a less daunting and more reproducible method for treating fissure in ano that is especially beneficial for junior surgeons and improving patient outcomes.

Botulinum toxin injection for chronic anal fissure: a prospective controlled study with long follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Botulinum toxin is an effective therapeutic option for chronic anal fissure. However, there is no evidence about treatment standardization and long-term follow-up. We aimed to evaluate the short- and long-term efficacy and safety of botulinum toxin compared to close lateral internal sphincterotomy, with a 5-year follow-up. METHODS: This was a prospective, controlled, single-center study conducted at University Hospital of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy. The primary outcome was fissure healing at 1 month. Secondary outcomes were Quality-of-Life (QoL) at 1 month and after 5 years, and fissure recurrence at 6 months and 5 years. RESULTS: A total of 59 patients received botulinum toxin injection (Botox), and 32 underwent lateral internal sphincterotomy. At 1 month after treatments, postoperative pain decreased faster and significantly more in the Botox group (30 vs. 60 mm; P<0.001); fissure re-epithelization was observed in 59.4% of the surgical group compared to 25.4% of Botox (P=0.0001). Anal sphincter pressures decreased more in surgical group (P=0.044), although severe anal incontinence was present only in this subset (6.2%; P=0.041). Compared to surgery, patients who received Botox had higher satisfaction rates (P<0.001). Fissure recurrence at 6 months was more common in Botox than surgical group (16.9% vs. 3.2%, respectively; P=0.053). The overall healing rate improved in all patients and persisted at 12 months and 5 years in both groups with overall high patient satisfaction despite mild anal incontinence in 21.8% in the surgery group (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Botox, rather than surgery, should be considered the first-line treatment for chronic anal fissure.

Comparing closed versus open lateral internal sphincterotomy for management of chronic anal fissure: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised control trials.

Chronic anal fissure is one of the most common benign anorectal health conditions, causing significant morbidity, quality of life, and economic loss. Eight randomized controlled trials with a total population size of 1035 were eligible for analysis. Seven studies included both males and female, while one only included females. The majority of randomized controlled trials involved female dominance [54.9% (43.5-66.3)] and posterior midline location [86.1% (95% CI 81.5-90.8%)]. This meta-analysis of randomised control trials found that overall postoperative healing was 90.2%, recurrent anal fissure was 3.7%, and postoperative incontinence was 8.9% after LIS. Even though there was no statistically significant difference, closed lateral internal sphincterotomy (LIS) had higher rates of recurrent anal fissure (RR = 1.73 (95% CI 0.86-3.47, p = 0.90, I2 = 0%) and lower rates of postoperative incontinence rate (RR = 0.60 (95% CI 0.37-0.96, p = 0.76, I2-0) as compared with open LIS. We recommended that closed lateral internal sphincterotomy (LIS) is a safe and effective surgical treatment option for chronic anal fissures.

Manejo Clínico ­ Quirúrgico de pacientes con Fisura Anal en la Unidad de Coloproctología del HECAM / Clinical-Surgical Management of patients with Anal Fissure in the Unit HECAM Coloproctology

La fisura anal es una de las enfermedades más antiguamente descritas, la misma que, ha tenido hasta el momento múltiples tratamientos tanto médicos como quirúrgicos, existiendo controversias en su algoritmo terapéutico. Constituye una de las patologías cuyo diagnóstico y tratamiento corresponde a la Especialidad de Coloproctología, afecta a ambos sexos y a cualquier edad y puede ser aguda o crónica. Proponemos el presente Protocolo para un adecuado manejo de la patología, de manera que sirva de guía en la toma correcta de decisiones basadas en la evidencia y el consenso de quienes integramos la Unidad Técnica de Coloproctología del Hospital de Especialidades Carlos Andrade Marín.

Anal fissure is one of the oldest described diseases, which has so far had multiple medical and surgical treatments, with controversies in its therapeutic algorithm. It is one of the pathologies whose diagnosis and treatment corresponds to the Coloproctology Specialty, it affects both sexes and any age and can be acute or chronic. We propose the present Protocol for an adequate management of the pathology, so that it serves as a guide in the correct decision making based on evidence and consensus of those who integrate the Technical Unit of Coloproctology of the Hospital de Especialidades Carlos Andrade Marín.

Fissurectomy versus lateral internal sphincterotomy in the treatment of chronic anal fissures: no advantages in terms of post-operative incontinence.

PURPOSE: The standard treatment for chronic anal fissures that have failed non-operative management is lateral internal sphincterotomy. Surgery can cause de novo incontinence. Fissurectomy has been proposed as a sphincter/saving procedure, especially in the presence of a deep posterior pouch with or without a crypt infection. This study investigated whether fissurectomy offers a benefit in terms of de novo post-operative incontinence. METHODS: Patients surgically managed with fissurectomy or lateral internal sphincterotomy for chronic anal fissures from 2013 to 2019 have been included. Healing rate, changes in continence and patient satisfaction were investigated at long-term follow-up. RESULTS: One hundred twenty patients (55 females, 65 males) were analysed: 29 patients underwent fissurectomy and 91 lateral internal sphincterotomy. Mean follow-up was 55 months [confidence interval (CI) 5-116 months]. Both techniques showed some rate of de novo post-operative incontinence (> +3 Vaizey score points): 8.9% lateral internal sphincterotomy, 17.8% fissurectomy (p = 0.338). The mean Vaizey score in these patients was 10.37 [standard deviation (sd) 6.3] after lateral internal sphincterotomy (LIS) and 5.4 (sd 2.3) after fissurectomy Healing rate was 97.8% in the lateral internal sphincterotomy group and 75.8% in the fissurectomy group (p = 0.001). In the lateral internal sphincterotomy group, patients with de novo post-op incontinence showed a statistically significant lower satisfaction rate (9.2 ± 1.57 versus 6.13 ± 3; p = 0.023) while no differences were present in the fissurectomy group (8.87 ± 1.69 versus 7.4 ± 1.14; p = 0.077). CONCLUSIONS: Lateral internal sphincterotomy is confirmed as the preferred technique in term of healing rate. Fissurectomy did not offer a lower rate of de novo post-operative incontinence, but resulted in lower Vaizey scores in patients in whom this occurred. Satisfaction was lower in patients suffering a de novo post-operative incontinence after lateral internal sphincterotomy.

Clinical Outcome of 0.2% Glyceryl Trinitrate Topical Ointment Compared to Lateral Internal Sphincterotomy in the Treatment of Patient with Chronic Anal Fissure: A Randomized Control Trial.

The objective of study was to evaluate the clinical outcome of topical 0.2% Glyceryl trinitrate topical (GTN) ointment in the treatment of chronic anal fissure. This randomized control trial was carried out in the Colorectal Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University (BSMMU), Bangladesh from May 2015 to April 2016. Total 94 patients were included in this trial, where 47(50.0%) patients were treated by 0.2% GTN ointment as Trial group 12 hourly for 8 weeks and 47(50.0%) patients by lateral internal sphincterotomy (LIS) as Control group in this study. Patients were randomized in two groups by lottery following purposive sampling. Post-procedural outcome variables with 6 months follow up were evaluated. Majority of the patients were found in between 20 to 40 years of age in both groups. The mean age was 34.6±10.4 years and 33.2±8.6 years in GTN and LIS respectively. Overall male female ratio was 0.88:1. All (100.0%) patients presented with pain in anus and 86.15% patients presented with per rectal bleeding. Pain relief in GTN arm versus LIS arm in 2nd and 6th week was 55.31% vs. 76.6%, 74.5% vs. 87.23% with no significant difference between two groups. But at 6 month it was 57.44% vs. 93.6% respectively. The fall in pain relief at 6th month in GTN arm was due to recurrence of fissure. At the end of 2nd, 6th week and 6month, cessation of bleeding improved gradually in both groups after treatment but the improvement was significantly better in LIS group than in GTN group indicating sphincterotomy stops bleeding better. Healing after 2nd week in both groups was minimum but equal 2(4.26%) patients. After 6 weeks LIS group had significant better healing than GTN 40(85.1%) versus 26(55.3%) with p value <0.001. In 6 month time GTN group had increased healing but LIS group had significant better healing than GTN group 42(89.36) vs. 32(68.08) with p value 0.004. Transient flatus and liquid incontinence were 8.51% and 6.4% respectively in LIS group with 0.0% in GTN group. Headache and recurrence were significantly higher in GTN group 61.7% and 34.04% with p<0.001. Lateral internal anal sphincterotomy is superior to the topical application of 0.2% nitroglycerin ointment in the treatment of chronic anal fissure with the advantages of good symptomatic relief, high rate of healing and a very low rate of transient continence disturbances.

Long-term fecal incontinence after lateral internal sphincterotomy for anal fissure.

<b>Introduction:</b> Anal fissure is a common benign anal condition. The gold standard treatment is lateral internal sphincterotomy (LIS), and this procedure carries a risk of incontinence. </br></br> <b> Aim:</b> The aim of this study is to determine the long-term risk of fecal incontinence after LIS. </br></br> <b> Method:</b> All patients who had LIS for chronic anal fissure between the years 2004-2010 were interviewed by phone and assessed for sphincter function (incontinence) using Wexner fecal incontinence score (WIS). </br></br> <b>Results:</b> Fifty-nine patients (34 females, 57.6%) with a mean follow-up duration of 10.6 years (range 8-15 years) were interviewed. Twelve patients (20.3%) had a WIS score of one or more. The majority of the patients noticed a change in sphincter function years after the operation. There was no association between vaginal delivery and the WIS score. </br></br> <b>Conclusion:</b> The long-term risk of abnormal sphincter function after LIS appears to be higher than expected, especially in the presence of multiple vaginal deliveries or systemic diseases such as diabetes mellitus. A larger prospective study is required to establish a correct risk of incontinence in the long term.

Subcutaneous incision of the fistula tract and internal sphincterotomy (SIFT-IS): a novel surgical procedure for transsphincteric anal fistula.

AIM: The aetiology of anal fistula has not been fully clarified. One of the causes of anal fistulas may be the markedly deep crypts that characterize the primary openings. We developed subcutaneous incision of the fistula tract and internal sphincterotomy (SIFT-IS) to eradicate these deep crypts. The aim of this study was to evaluate outcomes in patients with anal fistula treated with SIFT-IS. METHOD: A retrospective study was performed over a 2-year period. Patients with transsphincteric anal fistula who underwent SIFT-IS were enrolled. The primary endpoint was the anal fistula healing rate at 16 weeks postoperatively. The secondary endpoints were healing time, postoperative complications and clinical continence status. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty one patients were enrolled. Primary healing was accomplished in 129 patients (85%). There were 17 patients (11%) with a remnant fistula and five (3%) with a recurrence. The remnant fistulas healed spontaneously at more than 16 weeks postoperatively in seven patients. The median healing time was 6 (3-96) weeks. Surgical intervention was required in seven patients with a remnant fistula and four with recurrence. At the final follow-up, the wounds had healed in 148 patients (98%). No significant postoperative complications or incontinence were observed. CONCLUSION: Subcutaneous incision of the fistula tract and internal sphincterotomy is a promising surgical option for transsphincteric anal fistulas, with a satisfactory healing rate.

Esfinterotomía lateral interna vs. toxina botulínica como tratamiento de la fisura anal / Lateral Internal Sphincterotomy versus Botulinum Toxin as Treatment of Anal Fissure

Introducción: La fisura anal crónica es una entidad frecuente que produce molestias durante y después de la defecación, su fisiopatología no es clara y su manejo es variado. La esfinterotomia lateral interna es una de las técnicas más utilizadas, aunque su elevado porcentaje de incontinencia no es aceptado y la inyección de toxina botulínica es una alternativa tentadora. Objetivo: Comparar los resultados de la inyección de toxina botulínica tipo A con la esfinterotomia lateral interna para tratamiento de la fisura anal en cuanto a dolor postoperatorio, recurrencia, curabilidad e incontinencia. Métodos: Se realizó un estudio tipo cohorte. A un grupo de 40 pacientes se trató con inyección de 50 UI de Toxina Botulínica tipo A y el otro grupo de 42 pacientes se le realizó esfinterotomia lateral interna. Los resultados se comparan estadísticamente para CI95 y error de 0,05. Resultados: La esfinterotomia vs toxina botulínica, resultó en cuanto a curabilidad en un 85,4 por ciento de los casos contra un 77,5 por ciento. Las recidivas se presentaron en 4,8 por ciento / 12,5 por ciento, la incontinencia ocurrió en 9,5 por ciento / 2,5 por ciento y el dolor posoperatorio estuvo presente en el 14,8 por ciento / 5,0 por ciento. Conclusiones: La esfinterotomia resultó mejor en cuanto a curabilidad y recidivas, mientras la aplicación de la toxina botulínica presentó mejores resultados en la incontinencia fecal y el dolor posoperatorio(AU)

Introduction: Chronic anal fissure is a frequent entity that produces discomfort during and after defecation. Its pathophysiology is not clear and its management is varied. Lateral internal sphincterotomy is one of the most used techniques, although its high percentage of incontinence is not accepted; botulinum toxin injection is therefore a tempting alternative. Objective: To compare the results of botulinum toxin type A injection or lateral internal sphincterotomy for treatment of anal fissure in terms of postoperative pain, recurrence, healing and incontinence. Methods: A cohort study was carried out. One group of 40 patients were treated with injection of 50 IU of botulinum toxin type A and another group of 42 patients underwent lateral internal sphincterotomy. The results were statistically compared with a confidence interval of 95 percent and error of 0.05. Results: Sphincterotomy and botulinum toxin were effective in terms of healing in 85.4 percent and 77.5 percent of cases, respectively. Recurrences occurred in 4.8 percent and 12.5 percent of cases, respectively. Incontinence occurred in 9.5 percent and 2.5 percent of cases, respectively. Postoperative pain was present in 14.8 percent and 5.0 percent of cases, respectively. Conclusions: Sphincterotomy was better in terms of healing and recurrence, while botulinum toxin application showed better results regarding fecal incontinence and postoperative pain(AU)

Modified open posterior internal sphincterotomy with sliding skin graft for chronic anal fissure and anal stenosis: Low recurrence rate and no serious faecal incontinence postoperative complication.

AIM: Lateral internal sphincterotomy (LIS) remains a standard for chronic anal fissure even though other surgical techniques have shown high efficacy. Faecal incontinence is a well-documented complication of LIS. We devised modified open posterior internal sphincterotomy (m-OPIS) with sliding skin graft (SSG), which is a combined procedure of OPIS and anal advancement flap. The aim of this study is to evaluate m-OPIS+SSG. METHODS: This was a retrospective, observational, single-arm study. m-OPIS+SSG was performed for chronic anal fissure and anal stenosis. m-OPIS involved incision of the internal sphincter muscle at the posterior midline until four fingers could be passed. The incision wound was closed by anastomosis of the anoderm and skin. Then, an arcuate skin incision was created and the skin graft was advanced into the anal canal. Follow-up was conducted by clinical consultation and telephone interview. Faecal continence was assessed by Cleveland Clinic Faecal Incontinence (CCFI) score. RESULTS: m-OPIS+SSG was performed in 143 patients. The mean patient age was 50±16 years. The success and overall recurrence rates after m-OPIS+SSG were 99% and 0.7%, respectively, with a median follow-up period of 16.3 years. One patient developed incontinence with liquid stools once during the 6-month period. None of the other patients suffered permanent faecal incontinence postoperatively. The postoperative CCFI score was 0.5±0.9. CONCLUSIONS: We consider m-OPIS+SSG as one of the efficacious options of procedure for chronic anal fissure and anal stenosis, owing to its high success rate, low recurrence rate and no postoperative complication of serious faecal incontinence.

Real world outcomes of lateral internal sphincterotomy vs botulinum toxin for the management of chronic anal fissures.

BACKGROUND: Lateral internal sphincterotomy (LIS) remains the gold standard surgical approach for the management of chronic anal fissures (CAF). The procedure however, is complicated by the risk of postoperative incontinence. Intrasphincteric Botulinum Toxin (BT) has gained popularity as an alternative approach, despite being inferior to LIS with regards to cure rates. In the real world, patients at high risk for postoperative incontinence are likely to be offered BT as a preliminary procedure. The aim of this study was to explore the real-world outcomes of LIS and BT for a cohort of CAF patients. METHODS: 251 consecutive patients treated with either BT or LS for CAF by a single surgeon were reviewed. Patients were offered BT as a preliminary procedure if they had risk factors for faecal incontinence, whereas all other patients underwent LIS. Primary outcomes included rates of recurrence and faecal incontinence. RESULTS: LIS was superior to BT with regards to recurrence rates throughout the mean follow up period of five years (5% vs 15%, p = 0.012). A total of 17 patients experienced a minor degree of flatal incontinence at the 6-week follow up, although there was no difference between LIS and BT (7% vs 6%, p = 1.000). Four LIS patients (2%) continued to experience some minor incontinence to flatus at the 12-month follow up and were managed with biofeedback. CONCLUSION: For patients with CAF, individualizing the treatment approach according to risk factors for incontinence could mitigate this risk in LIS. High risk patients should be offered BT as a preliminary procedure.

Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial of Ultra-modified Internal Sphincterotomy vs Closed Lateral Internal Sphincterotomy for Chronic Fissure-in-Ano.

BACKGROUND: Currently, the lateral internal sphincterotomy is the treatment of choice for a chronic anal fissure (CAF). However, the length of the internal sphincter incision varies, due to lack of standardization. Insufficient length increases the risk of recurrence. To compare a new ultra-modified internal sphincterotomy (UMIS) to the closed lateral internal sphincterotomy (CLIS) for treating CAF, based on internal anal sphincter function and postoperative complications. The primary endpoint was continence after UMIS. The secondary outcomes were CAF healing complications, visual analog scale pain scores, and sphincter pressures. METHODS: This was a prospective, randomized, controlled trial (block randomization method). 200 patients with CAFs were randomly assigned to receive either UMIS (n = 100) or the closed lateral internal sphincterotomy (CLIS) (n = 100). Follow-up was 2 years. RESULTS: All (100%) patients in both groups showed clinical improvement at 1 month post-surgery. Recurrences were accompanied by deteriorations in Cleveland Clinic Florida Fecal Incontinence scores at 12 months and 2 years (P < .05). The groups showed significant differences in fissure healing rates and pain scores. After 1 and 2 years, incontinence rates were significantly higher, and patient satisfaction scores were significantly lower in the CLIS group than the UMIS group (P < .05). CONCLUSION: UMIS provided a faster healing rate and fewer side effects than the CLIS for treating CAFs. These results might lead to a standardized treatment among surgeons.

A randomised controlled study: the effects of internal sphincterotomy of the anus on defecation disorders in patients with outlet obstructive and mixed constipation.

BACKGROUND: This study sought to investigate the effects of internal sphincterotomy of the anus in the treatment of defecation disorders in patients with outlet obstructive and mixed constipation. METHODS: This study included 250 patients, who met the Rome III criteria for functional defecation disorder-associated constipation and were admitted to the Proctology Department in the People's Hospital of Dazu District between July 2014 and June 2016. The patients were randomly divided into the traditional medical treatment group (n=125) and the surgical treatment group (n=125), and received traditional treatment and internal anal sphincterotomy, respectively. All patient clinical data were retrospectively analyzed. Indices relating to anorectal pressure, electromyographic indices of abdominal muscles, sleep quality, anxiety and depression, defecography and anal healing before and after treatment were measured, and the effects of the different treatment modalities on defecation disorders were analyzed. RESULTS: The total treatment effective rate was significantly higher in the surgical treatment group than in the traditional treatment group (P<0.05). The Constipation Scoring System scores at time points 1, 2 and 3 were significantly lower in the surgical treatment group than in the traditional treatment group (P<0.001). After treatment, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and Pittsburg Sleep Quality Index scores were significantly lower in the surgical treatment group than in the traditional treatment group (P<0.001). After treatment, the rectal resting pressure and 10SR were significantly lower in the surgical treatment group than in the traditional treatment group (P<0.001). After treatment, the negative conversion rate of the balloon expulsion test was significantly higher in the surgical treatment group than in the traditional treatment group (P<0.05), while the rectocele, perineum descending distance, and anorectal angle of the efforts phase were significantly lower in the surgical treatment group than in the traditional treatment group (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Internal anal sphincterotomy can significantly relieve defecation disorders and clinical symptoms, improve sleep quality, eliminate psychological disorders, and promote patient recovery. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2100048818.