Effect of 4-week preoperative prism adaptation in preventing postoperative residual esotropia.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative prism adaptation (PPA) simulates postoperative status and possibly can predict postoperative undercorrection before surgery in esotropia. The present study aimed to assess the effect of 4-week PPA in preventing postoperative residual esotropia. METHODS: Seventy-five (75) esotropes who had undergone surgery at a single strabismus center were retrospectively enrolled. They included 25 basic, 31 acute comitant, 10 partially accommodative, and 9 recurrent esotropia patients. The preoperative deviation angle, which had been determined using the alternating prism and cover test, was fully corrected with press-on prisms 4 weeks before surgery. If there was an increase of 5 PD or more of esodeviation, the prisms were changed accordingly at 2 weeks. The deviation angle measured at 4 weeks was determined as the surgical target angle. Patients were then divided into increase (≥ 5 PD increase of angle during 4-week PPA) and non-increase groups. Success was defined as either esodeviation of 8 PD or under or exodeviation of 5 PD or under at distance at postoperative 6 months. RESULTS: The increase group included 44 patients (58.7%). The mean deviation angle before PPA was 27.4 PD, and after the 4-week PPA, there was an average increase of 9.4 PD. The success rate was 90.9% in the increase group and 96.8% in the non-increase group (p = 0.316). There were no intergroup differences in preoperative clinical characteristics, esotropia types, postoperative deviation angle or postoperative near stereopsis (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study indicated a beneficial effect of 4-week PPA in esotropia of various types, specifically by uncovering the hidden esodeviation in the increase group and simulating the postoperative alignment in both the increase and the non-increase groups.

[Influence of prism overcorrection on residual postoperative strabismus]. / Einfluss der Prismenüberkorrektur auf den postoperativen Restschielwinkel.

BACKGROUND: Prism overcorrection is a complementary procedure to reduce the residual postoperative esotropia caused by anomalous retinal correspondence (ARC) after surgery for esotropia. We have investigated the results of this treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: For Group 1, the files of 63 patients treated with postoperative prism overcorrection in the Department of Ophthalmology, University of Giessen, were evaluated regarding the pre-and postoperative squint angles (SPCT, simultaneous and APCT, alternate prism and cover test) and the angle of ARC, determined by the red filter test and by the increase of esotropia after neutralisation of the squint angle (APCT). Postoperatively, squint angles had been measured immediately (APCT) after removal of the eye patch and 10 minutes to 2 hours later (SPCT and APCT). Subsequently, prism overcorrection was performed with a Fresnel prism foil (40 PD basis temporally) in front of the fellow eye for a maximum of 3 months. After 3 months, SPCT and APCT were performed. For Group 2, the files of 28 patients with a preoperative angle of ARC of 5 degrees or more, treated in the Department of Ophthalmology, University of Heidelberg, were evaluated. These patients had not been treated with prism overcorrection. The squint angles had been measured (SPCT and APCT) on the preoperative day, on the first postoperative day, a few hours after removing the eye patch, and after three months. RESULTS: For Group 1, at surgery, the patients were 4 to 12 years old (median: 6.2 years). The preoperative squint angle ranged from + 5 degrees to + 27 degrees (median: + 12 degrees) in the SPCT and from + 7 degrees to + 27 degrees (median: + 14 degrees) in the APCT. The angle of ARC was between + 4 degrees and + 15 degrees (median: + 7 degrees). Both combined recess and resect surgery (with or without additional oblique muscle surgery) or bilateral retroequatorial medial rectus myopexy, in part depending on the squint angle pattern with medial rectus recession, were performed. Immediately after removing the patch, the squint angle (APCT) was between - 10 degrees and + 5 degrees (median: + 1 degrees). Ten minutes to 2 hours later, the manifest squint angle ranged from 0 to + 12 degrees (median: + 7 degrees). The angle had decreased significantly to - 6 to + 12 degrees (median: + 5 degrees) after 3 months. For Group 2, the patients' ages were between 5 and 12 years (median: 6.5 years). The squint angles ranged from + 11.5 degrees to + 35 degrees (median: + 20 degrees) in the SPCT and APCT. The angle of ARC was between + 5 degrees and + 17 degrees (median: + 8 degrees). Combined recess and resect surgery or bilateral recession of the medial rectus (with or without oblique muscle surgery both) were performed. The SPCT several hours after removal of the patch showed angles of - 4 degrees to + 14 degrees (median: + 4.25 degrees). Three months later the manifest squint angles ranged from - 5 degrees to + 14 degrees (median: + 3 degrees). DISCUSSION: After prism overcorrection (Group 1), there was a significant reduction of the residual esotropia. Without this additional treatment (Group 2), there was no significant change in the postoperative squint angle. However, neither the positive outcome in Group 1 nor the difference to Group 2 do unequivocally prove that there is a beneficial effect of prism overcorrection, since preoperative conditions were different and the sample size in Group 2 was small, especially after matching for equal preoperative conditions. A spontaneous reduction of the postoperative esotropia cannot be excluded. Further studies are necessary in order to investigate the specific effect of prism overcorrection.

[Management of hyperopia in children]. / Prise en charge de l'hypermétropie de l'enfant.

PURPOSE: To study the prevalence of hyperopia in school-aged children and to analyze the factors that increase the risk of squint or amblyopia in a retrospective study. METHODS: Three hundred eyes of 150 children with hyperopia who did not have anisometropia > or =1.5 D were selected. Complete ophthalmological examination was performed for all children. Hyperopia was defined when spherical equivalent was +0.5 D or greater. Amblyopia was screened and treated by patching therapy and then penalisation. Complete spectacle correction was achieved in children with high hyperopia (+3.5 D or greater) or in presence of squint or amblyopia. A statistical analysis compared the results using the Mann-Whitney test and the chi square test. RESULTS: The mean age was 9.5+/-2.7 years. Girls were statistically more represented than boys. The mean sphere measured overall was +2 D (+/-1.65). Severe hyperopia was detected in 19% of the children; it was latent in 35% of children. Strabismus was detected in 7% and was accommodative in 25%. Esotropia was the most prevalent deviation (72.8%). The prevalence of amblyopia was 12%. The mean sphere measured in amblyopic children was 5.66 D (+/-1.64 D). Initial depth of amblyopia was mild to moderate and 98% of the children achieved iso-acuity after patching therapy. The correlation between severe hyperopia, amblyopia, and squint was statistically significant. Indeed, the risk ratios of squint and amblyopia, 5.2 and 3.70, respectively, were significantly high in children with severe hypermetropia. Complete spectacle correction improved final visual acuity and reduced the angle deviation in accommodative esotropia. CONCLUSION: Children with hyperopia of +3.5 D or greater have an increased risk of amblyopia and squint that threatens their visual function. Hyperopic correction should be prescribed even if no strabismus or amblyopia is detected in order to prevent this risk. Screening programs should also be promoted to detect these children at an early age.

Costs and methods of preventive visual screening and the relation between esotropia and increasing hypermetropia.

Atkinson has shown that early correction of hypermetropia reduces the incidence of esotropia. If esotropia is reduced by prescribing glasses early, the rate of esotropia-induced amblyopia can be similarly reduced; this would have important economic consequences. We have studied (1) how costs compare to benefits in early visual screening, (2) how videorefraction as used by Atkinson compares to retinoscopy, and (3) whether esotropia is more likely to occur in children who have increasing as opposed to decreasing hypermetropia. The costs of the study so far have been high. It was exceedingly difficult to get all infants invited, come to the clinic and examined. Videorefraction did not compare favourably with retinoscopy in terms of costs and precision, whereas the amount of skill and time needed was approximately equal. The third question, whether esotropia is more likely to occur in children who have increasing as opposed to decreasing hypermetropia, arose from the controversy whether, in the general population, refraction increases or decreases during the first years of life. We found that papers reporting a decrease of hypermetropia in early childhood were studies of large cross-sections of the general population, whereas papers that reported an initial increase originated from ophthalmological practices or strabismus departments. These conflicting results could be reconciled by assuming a population bias: if esotropia is more likely to occur in children with increasing hypermetropia, children with increasing hypermetropia will preferentially be seen by ophthalmologists. It seems natural that children with increasing hypermetropia are more likely to squint, because additional accommodation, needed to overcome increasing hypermetropia, will inevitably confer additional convergence. This relationship has meanwhile been confirmed by others.