The Effect of Surgical Decompression and Fusion on Functional Balance in Patients With Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: To quantify the effect of lumbar decompression and fusion surgery on balance and stability in patients with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS) and compare them to controls. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: DLS is a condition in which one vertebra subluxates relative to an adjacent vertebra in the absence of a disruption in the neural arch. While the existing literature demonstrates that decompression and fusion can successfully alleviate pain and reduce disability in patients with DLS, no studies to date have used quantitative dynamic testing to determine the effect of surgery on cone of economy (CoE) measures in this patient population. METHODS: Forty-five DLS patients performed a series of functional balance tests a week before and 3 months after surgery and were compared to 28 controls. The outcome measures included range of sway (RoS) and total sway for the center of mass (CoM) and head in the sagittal, coronal, and axial planes, along with leg and back Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Fear/Avoidance Behavior Questionnaire (FABQ), Tampa Scale of Kinesophobia (TSK), and Demoralization scale. RESULTS: RoS for the CoM (P < 0.005) and head (P < 0.017) decreased in all planes postoperatively. Reductions in CoM (P = 0.001) and head total sway (P = 0.001) were also observed after surgery. Furthermore, patients with DLS reported strong improvements in VAS low back (P = 0.001), VAS leg (P = 0.001), ODI (P = 0.001), FABQ Physical (P = 0.003), TSK (P = 0.001), and demoralization (P = 0.044) with surgical intervention. Although total sway was reduced after surgery, it did not return to the level of normal controls as demonstrated with more total sway of their CoM (P = 0.002) and head (P = 0.001) as well as more sagittal head RoS (P = 0.048). CONCLUSION: This study confirms that surgical intervention for degenerative spondylolisthesis is effective at reducing disability, back and leg pain, demoralization, kinesiophobia, and fear-avoidance beliefs related to physical activity in patients with DLS. Furthermore, such patients exhibit a significantly more stable stance after surgery. However, balance parameters did not completely normalize by 3 months postoperatively. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Patient-reported Quality of Life Following Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion or Indirect Decompression Using Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective review of prospectively collected data. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare quality of life (QOL) outcomes of posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) with lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) using reports from patients obtained at the 2-year postoperative follow-up. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Indirect decompression with LLIF is used to treat degenerative lumbar diseases that require neural decompression. However, the difference in improvement in QOL following indirect decompression compared with direct neural decompression using PLIF is unclear. METHODS: We enrolled 284 consecutive patients with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis in the present study, 203 who underwent PLIF and 81 who underwent LLIF. All patients completed a minimum of 2 years of follow-up. We evaluated the effectiveness of surgery in each category of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ). RESULTS: The results of preoperative JOABPEQ and the severity of thecal sac stenosis were not significantly different between PLIF and LLIF, neither was the rate of perioperative complications (14.8% and 15.4% for the PLIF and LLIF groups, respectively; P = 0.91). The effectiveness at 2 years postoperatively was almost the same for all five domains of the JOABPEQ: 62.6% and 68.9% for pain-related disorders (P = 0.34), 38.3% and 42.7% for lumbar spine dysfunction (P = 0.51), 65.8% and 67.5% for gait disturbance (P = 0.79), 53.5% and 48.8% for social life dysfunction (P = 0.47), and 29.1% and 33.3% for psychological disorders (P = 0.48) following PLIF and LLIF, respectively. Visual analogue scale results for back and lower-limb pain and numbness of the lower limbs were almost the same for both groups. No significant differences were observed in terms of perioperative complications and radiographical outcomes. CONCLUSION: Indirect decompression using LLIF improves QOL and radiographical outcomes to a comparable degree as direct decompression via PLIF. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

Disability, emotional distress and well-being among patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis.

AIM AND OBJECTIVE: To explore the disability, emotional distress and well-being of patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis. BACKGROUND: Few studies have investigated the correlations between disability, emotional distress and well-being of patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis. DESIGN: This study used a cross-sectional research design. METHODS: Participants were 133 patients aged over 50 years who were experiencing lumbar spondylolisthesis. The research instruments included a demographic information questionnaire; the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS); the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI); the Chinese versions of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-State (STAI-S) and Center for Epidemiological Study-Depression (CES-D); and the Psychological Well-being (PWB) Scale. Emotional distress was measured by the STAI-S and CES-D. Pearson's correlations coefficient, multiple linear regression and a mediating effect model were introduced to explore correlations between the variables and predictors of psychological well-being, and details of the methods are reported in coherence to STROBE criteria. RESULTS: Eighty-six participants (64.6%) had moderate and severe anxiety, and 42 (31.6%) experienced depression. Participants reported medium to high levels of well-being; "satisfaction with interpersonal relationships" was rated the highest and "physical and mental health" the lowest. Disability, depression and anxiety had significant negative correlations with well-being. Depression and anxiety mediated the relationship between disability and well-being. Moreover, depression, family support, educational background and anxiety were predictors of well-being, accounting for 39.1% of the total variance. CONCLUSIONS: Disability and emotional distress among patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis had a negative impact on well-being. Anxiety and depression were closely correlated with and substantially influenced well-being. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Health professionals will enhance the understanding of important factors influencing well-being among patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis. This study suggests the conduct of depression and anxiety evaluations at outpatient clinics and prior to surgery, so that clinicians will be aware of the emotional distress status of patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis and, therefore, enhance their well-being.

Self-Image and Health-Related Quality of Life Three Decades After Fusion In Situ for High-Grade Isthmic Spondylolisthesis.

STUDY DESIGN: Observational study. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate self-image after in situ fusion for high-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Certain clinical findings such as short trunk or waistline skin folds are often seen in high-grade spondylolisthesis. Since treatment with spinal fusion in situ does not address appearance, self-image and also health-related quality of life might be negatively affected in the short-term as well as the long-term perspective. This observational study evaluated health-related quality of life outcome including self-image three decades after in situ fusion for high-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis in relation to healthy controls. METHODS: Thirty-eight of 39 consecutive patients, fused in situ for high-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis at a young age, completed the Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-22r questionnaire 28-41 years after surgery. The results were compared with the results of an age- and gender-matched control group. RESULTS: We found that the SRS-22r self-image domain scores were statistically significantly lower in patients than in controls whereas the pain and mental health scores were similar in patients and controls. Also, the SRS-22r function domain scores were statistically significantly lower in patients but the difference in means was small. We found no correlation between severity of slip and SRS-22r outcome. CONCLUSIONS: In situ fusion for high-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis is a safe treatment option in the long term from a function and pain perspective, but the results of our study suggest that self-image is negatively affected long into adult life. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Expectations for Postoperative Improvement in Health-Related Quality of Life in Young Patients With Lumbosacral Spondylolisthesis: A Prospective Cohort Study.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective multicenter study of the changes in Scoliosis Research Society Outcome Questionaire 22 (SRS-22) scores for 78 patients younger than 25 years old surgically treated for lumbosacral spondylolisthesis OBJECTIVE.: Report the change of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in patients younger than 25 years after surgical treatment of lumbosacral spondylolisthesis. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: There is a paucity of data with regard to the influence of surgical treatment on the HRQOL of patients with lumbosacral spondylolisthesis. Large prospective studies are needed to clearly define the benefits of surgery in the young patient population. METHODS: A prospective multicenter cohort of 78 patients younger than 25 years (14.8 ±â€Š2.9, range: 7.9-23.6 yr) undergoing posterior fusion for lumbosacral spondylolisthesis were enrolled. There were 17 patients with low-grade (<50%) and 61 with high-grade (≥50%) slips. SRS-22 scores calculated before surgery and after 2 years of follow-up were compared for all patients using two-tailed paired t tests. Subanalyses for low- and high-grade patients were done using two-tailed Wilcoxon signed ranked and paired t tests, respectively. The level of significance was set at 0.05. RESULTS: HRQOL was significantly improved 2 years after surgery for all domains and for the total score of the SRS-22 questionnaire. The individual total score was improved in 66 patients (85%), and 52 patients (67%) improved by at least 0.5 point. All domains and the total score of the SRS-22 questionnaire were significantly improved for high-grade patients, whereas only pain, function, and total score were improved for low-grade patients. CONCLUSION: This is the largest study comparing the HRQOL before and after surgery in young patients with low- and high-grade lumbosacral spondylolisthesis. HRQOL significantly improves after surgery for the majority of patients, especially for high-grade patients. This study helps clinicians to better counsel patients with regard to the benefits of surgery for lumbosacral spondylolisthesis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2.

A web-based platform to accommodate symptoms of anxiety and depression by featuring social interaction and animated information in patients undergoing lumbar spine fusion: a randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: Approximately one-third of patients undergoing spine surgery have symptoms of anxiety and depression that correlate with pain, disability, and lower health-related quality of life. The use of web-based informative strategies before surgery and principles from cognitive behavioral therapy, have been applied in other patient groups, facilitating mobility and encouraging beneficial coping behavior. PURPOSE: To examine the effect of a web-based Spine Platform featuring Interaction and Information by Animation (w-SPIINA) on symptoms of anxiety and depression, pain, disability, and health-related quality of life. STUDY DESIGN: A single-center, two-arm, randomized controlled trial PATIENT SAMPLE: One hundred fourteen consecutive patients scheduled for instrumented lumbar spine fusion due to degenerative disc disease or spondylolisthesis. OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome was the change in self-reported Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) scores from baseline to 3-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes were change in HADS 1-day before surgery 2days and 6 months after and changes in self-reported disability measured on the Oswestry disability index (ODI), quality of life (EQ-5D-5L questionnaire), and the low back pain rating scale (LBPRS) 2days and 3 and 6 months after surgery. METHOD: Patients were randomized to either a control group receiving a standard information regimen or an intervention group gaining access to w-SPIINA in addition to the standard regimen. The independent charity Helsefonden contributed $45,000, the Health Research Fund of the Regional Hospital Central Jutland contributed $10,000, and the Toyota foundation contributed $10,000 to remunerate a dedicated investigator. The authors have no conflict of interest to declare. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference within the w-SPIINA group and the control group regarding changes in HADS at 3-month follow-up (p≥.37). Approximately 40% reached minimum clinically important difference (MCID) in the w-SPIINA group on the HADS at 3 months. In the control group 50% reached MCID on anxiety subscale and 35% on the depression subscale at 3 months. No statistically significant differences were found between groups with regard to the overall outcomes at any of the predefined time points. CONCLUSION: Providing patients with access to w-SPIINA in addition to a standard information regimen had no additional effect on HADS and patient-reported outcomes1day before, 2days, 3 or 6 months after surgery. However, a high compliance and degree of interaction with w-SPIINA indicates that this mode of web-based support could be applicable in this group of patients.

Long-Term Minimum Clinically Important Difference in Health-Related Quality of Life Scores After Instrumented Lumbar Interbody Fusion for Low-Grade Isthmic Spondylolisthesis.

BACKGROUND: Despite its growing popularity, no comparative studies have explored the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) of health-related quality of life scores following lumbar interbody fusion (LIF) performed on a single-level adult low-grade isthmic spondylolisthesis (LGIS). OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to investigate factors related to MCID of health-related quality of life scores following instrumented LIF performed on a single-level adult LGIS. METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent instrumented LIF for single-level LGIS were reviewed. The inclusion criteria were adult patients who underwent L4-5 or L5-S1, underwent anterior lumbar interbody fusion or transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with a posterior screw fixation, and had a minimum 36-month postoperative follow-up period. MCID was defined as having an improved score of visual analog scale (VAS) back and leg pain >3 and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) >12. Patients were subdivided into groups named "achievement" (A) and "nonachievement" (N) depending on their postoperative MCID for each health-related quality of life score category. RESULTS: One-hundred and five patients met the inclusion criteria. The overall achievement of MCID for VAS back, leg, and ODI was 80%, 73.3%, and 82.9%. MCID-VAS leg and ODI were less achieved at the L5-S1 level than at the L4-5 level. Postoperatively, disk height was higher and segmental lordosis (SL) was lower in group A of MCID-VAS leg. SL was lower in group A of MCID-ODI. CONCLUSIONS: We postulate that excessive SL does not affect lumbar lordosis; rather, it can result in lowering posterior disk height. The decrease in posterior DH may lead to a decreased foraminal height that, in turn, can lead to nerve root compression. Proper restoration of disk height and bone fusion is more important than restoration of more segmental lordosis or slip reduction for isthmic spondylolisthesis.

Quality of Life and Slip Progression in Degenerative Spondylolisthesis Treated Nonoperatively.

STUDY DESIGN: A prospective cohort study of consecutive patients. OBJECTIVE: Determination of the quality of life (QoL) and prevalence of slip progression in patients with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis managed nonoperatively. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Lumbar spinal stenosis secondary to degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis is a common radiographic diagnosis associated with chronic back pain and radicular symptoms. There is limited evidence as to the clinical course in terms of validated QoL measures, and the extent of slip progression in patients with this condition treated nonoperatively. METHODS: Validated disease-specific and generic QoL metrics including SF12 physical and mental scores [SF12-physical component summary (PCS) and SF12-mental component summary (MCS)], Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and numeric scales for back and leg pain as well as radiographic assessment of slip extent were evaluated at initial consultation (baseline) and at a minimum of 5 years after the baseline assessment. Slip progression was defined by a >5% increase in slip percentage. RESULTS: Thirty-nine of 160 (24.4%) patients elected to switch to operative management, despite no slip progression on preoperative radiographs. Seventy spondylolisthetic levels in 66 participants were assessed after a minimum of 5 years of nonoperative management. Twenty-one participants (31.8%) had slip progression. SF12-PCS, ODI, and leg pain improved similarly in both groups (P < 0.05). SF12-MCS did not change significantly in either group. Back pain improved only in the nonprogressing group. CONCLUSION: The majority of cases of low-grade spondylolisthesis do not progress over 5 years with nonoperative management. Regardless of whether there was progression or not, the mean PCS, ODI, and leg pain improved from baseline, although symptoms remained and a significant number elected to switch to surgical management before 5 years. Back pain improved with nonoperative treatment only in those without progression. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2.

The Effect of Anxiety, Depression, and Optimism on Postoperative Satisfaction and Clinical Outcomes in Lumbar Spinal Stenosis and Degenerative Spondylolisthesis Patients: Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of depression, anxiety, and optimism on postoperative satisfaction and clinical outcomes in patients who underwent less than two-level posterior instrumented fusions for lumbar spinal stenosis and degenerative spondylolisthesis. METHODS: Preoperative psychological status of subjects, such as depression, anxiety, and optimism, was evaluated using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and the Revised Life Orientation Test (LOT-R). Clinical evaluation was determined by measuring changes in a visual analogue scale (VAS) and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) before and after surgery. Postoperative satisfaction of subjects assessed using the North American Spine Society lumbar spine questionnaire was comparatively analyzed against the preoperative psychological status. The correlation between patient's preoperative psychological status (depression, anxiety, and optimism) and clinical outcomes (VAS and ODI) was evaluated. RESULTS: VAS and ODI scores significantly decreased after surgery (p < 0.001), suggesting clinically favorable outcomes. Preoperative psychological status of patients (anxiety, depression, and optimism) was not related to the degree of improvement in clinical outcomes (VAS and ODI) after surgery. However, postoperative satisfaction was moderately correlated with optimism. CONCLUSIONS: Anxiety and optimism were more correlated with patient satisfaction than clinical outcomes. Accordingly, the surgeon can predict postoperative satisfaction of patients based on careful evaluation of psychological status before surgery.

Lumbar magnetic resonance imaging findings in patients with and without Waddell Signs.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Waddell Signs (WS), introduced as a method to establish patients with substantial psychosocial components to their low back pain, carry a negative association despite no literature evaluating whether physical disease is associated with them. PURPOSE: To compare lumbar magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings between the patients with and without WS. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study based on prospectively collected data. PATIENT SAMPLE: Thirty patients aged 35 to 55 years with an Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score >50 randomly selected such that there was an even distribution of patients based on the number of WS. OUTCOME MEASURES: ODI and Short Form-12 scores, number of WS, presence and severity of spinal pathology. METHODS: MRIs were reviewed by three spine specialists blinded to clinical exam findings, number of WS, and patient identity. Type and severity of pathology and presence of surgical and non-surgical lesions were assessed, and findings were rank ordered based on the overall impression of the pathology. There was no external funding or potential conflicts of interest for this study. RESULTS: There were significantly more individual pathologic findings in patients without WS (p=.02). However, there was no difference in the severity of pathology based on WS (p=.46). Furthermore, the rank ordering based on overall impression of severity showed no difference between the patients with and without WS (p=.20). Although 100% of the patients without WS showed pathologic findings on MRI, 70% of WS patients also had significant pathology on MRI. The prevalence of spondylolisthesis, stenosis, and disc herniation was similar (p=.41, p=.22, and p=.43, respectively). The prevalence and mean number of lesion amenable to surgery did not differ based on presence of WS (p=.21 and p=.18, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with WS present a difficult diagnostic challenge for the physician as their organic symptoms are often coexistent with emotional fear avoidance behavior. Although there is more overall pathology in patients without WS, a significant number of these patients appear to have comparable spinal pathology with equivalent severity, which may be contributing to patients' symptoms and disability. Presence of these non-organic symptoms often makes us doubt these patients. However, as part of effective treatment, physicians should better understand both the physical and psychological components of patient disability.

Measurement Properties of the Scoliosis Research Society Outcomes Questionnaire in Adolescent Patients With Spondylolisthesis.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective validation of the Scoliosis Research Society Outcomes Questionnaire French-Canadian version (SRS-22fv) in adolescent patients with spondylolisthesis. OBJECTIVE: To determine the measurement properties of the SRS-22fv. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The SRS-22 is widely used for the assessment of health-related quality of life in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) and other spinal deformities. Spondylolisthesis has an important effect on quality of life. The instrument was previously used in this population, although its measurement properties remained unknown. We aim to determine its reliability, factorial, concurrent validity, and its discriminant capacity in an adolescent spondylolisthesis population. METHODS: The SRS-22fv was tested in 479 subjects (272 patients with spondylolisthesis, 143 with AIS, and 64 controls) at a single institution. Its reliability was measured using the coefficient of internal consistency, concurrent validity by the short form-12 (SF-12v2 French version) and discriminant validity using multivariate analysis of variance, analysis of covariance, and multivariate linear regression. RESULTS: The SRS-22fv showed a good global internal consistency (spondylolisthesis: Cronbach α = 0.91, AIS: 0.86, and controls: 0.78) in all its domains for spondylolisthesis patients. It showed a factorial structure consistent with the original questionnaire, with 60% of explained variance under four factors. Moderate to high correlation coefficients were found for specifically corresponding domains between SRS-22fv and SF-12v2. Boys had higher scores than do girls, scores worsened with increasing age and body mass index. Analysis of covariance showed statistically significant differences between patients with spondylolisthesis, patients with AIS, and controls when controlling for age, sex, body mass index, pain, function, and self-image scores. In the spondylolisthesis group, scores on all domains and mean total scores were significantly lower in surgical candidates and in patients with high-grade spondylolisthesis. Low to moderate ceiling effects were shown in function (1.1%), self-image (10.7%), and pain (13.6%). CONCLUSION: The SRS-22fv can discriminate between healthy and spondylolisthesis subjects. It can be used in spondylolisthesis patients to assess health-related quality of life. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

Can physical therapy centred on cognitive and behavioural principles improve pain self-efficacy in symptomatic lumbar isthmic spondylolisthesis? A case series.

PURPOSE: Pain-related self-efficacy is defined as "the beliefs held by people with chronic pain that were able to carry out certain activities, even when experiencing pain", and it is considered a relevant mediator in the relationship between pain and disability in chronic low back pain. This case series describes a treatment aiming to improve pain self-efficacy in patients with symptomatic lumbar spondylolisthesis. METHOD: Ten consecutive outpatients with lumbar spondylolisthesis and chronic LBP referred to a rehabilitative clinic participated in this study. Cognitive and behavioural principles were integrated with functional and graded approach in each individual physical therapy program. The outcome measures concerned clinical instability and endurance tests, pain, disability and self-efficacy. RESULTS: Pain self-efficacy and lumbar function improved in 7 out of 10 patients; clinical tests improved in 9 out of 10 patients. CONCLUSION: A rehabilitation program carried out by a physical therapist, centred on cognitive and behavioural principles, appeared useful in improving pain self-efficacy and lumbar function. These results may be interesting for future controlled trials.

Patient-Based Surgical Outcomes of Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Patient Satisfaction Analysis.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective study. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate: (1) patient-based surgical outcomes of posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF); (2) correlations between patient-based surgical outcomes and surgeon-based surgical outcomes; (3) factors associated with patient satisfaction. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: There have been no reports of patient-based surgical outcomes of PLIF for lumbar spondylolisthesis. METHODS: Patients who underwent PLIF for L4 degenerative spondylolisthesis between 2006 and 2009 were reviewed (n = 121). Surgical outcomes were assessed 5 years after primary surgery using a questionnaire, a numerical rating scale (NRS) of pain, the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), the Japanese Orthopedic Association score (JOA score), and the recovery rate. The original questionnaire consisted of 5 categories, with scoring out of 100 points for surgery, satisfaction, improvement, recommendation to others, and willingness to undergo repeat surgery. Patient-based outcomes were divided into 3 groups according to the questionnaire responses as positive, intermediate, and negative and were compared with the JOA scores. RESULTS: A total of 103 patients responded, for a response rate of 85%. The average patient-evaluated score for surgery was 82 points. The positive response rate in each category was 78% for satisfaction, 88% for improvement, 74% for recommendation, and 71% for repeat. The average pre- and postoperative JOA scores were 11.2 and 23.2, respectively. The average recovery rate was 68.5%. There were significant correlations between patient-based surgical outcomes and the JOA score. Furthermore, there were significant correlations between patient-based surgical outcomes and the NRS and physical component scores of the SF-36. Postoperative permanent motor loss was a major factor related to a negative response. CONCLUSION: The patient-evaluated score for surgery was 82 points. More than 70% of patients gave positive responses in all sections of the questionnaire. There were significant correlations between patient-based and surgeon-based surgical outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2.

Comparison of Quality-of-Life after the Three Different Techniques of Transpedicular Screw Fixation (TPSF) in Lumbar Spondylolisthesis (LS): Results of a Therapeutic Cohort Study.

Background: Transpedicular screw fixation in lumbar spondylolisthesis remains debatable for which aspects that provide better quality of life outcomes such as procedure of convention, navigation-assisted or mini-open technique. Objective: To analyze the clinical outcomes and assess pre-operative versus postoperative quality-of-life outcomes of patients diagnosed with LS who underwent three different techniques of spinal fusion. Material and Method: A prospective cohort study was conducted with 60 patients with LS who received conventional TPSF or navigation-assisted TPSF or mini-open TPSF at Prasat Neurological Institute between 2010 and 2012. The 12-month follow-up patients were recruited for a structured interview regarding social life, mental health, functional capacity or an independent living status. The quality-of-life measurement was determined using Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and the Short Form-36 Health Survey (SF-36). Results: Comparisons of quality of life outcomes declared significant differences through the 12-month follow-up evaluation. According to ODI, navigation-assisted group presented with significant level of faster recovery than conventional and miniopen groups at one week (p = 0.031) and one month (p = 0.008) after surgery. At one year follow-up, the navigation-assisted technique was noted to have a significant better improvement (p = 0.033 and mean ODI scores = 5.8) compared with conventional and mini-open techniques (mean ODI scores = 8.7 and 10.6, respectively). Moreover, SF36 assessment indicated considerably improvement at 12 months after surgery. In addition, the finding reveals no statistically significant differences among three techniques. Conclusion: Overall, three different techniques provide the positive outcomes of quality of life. The 12-month follow-up of quality of life measures based on ODI suggest that the navigation-assisted technique was significantly associated with wellrecovered at one week and one month after surgery. However, in terms of clinical outcomes, they do not make any considerable differences to patient care within the 12-month follow-up period.

Extent of preoperative depression is associated with return to work after lumbar fusion for spondylolisthesis.

BACKGROUND: The ability to understand factors associated with an increased duration of missed work postoperatively could be used to more effectively select patients with the greatest opportunity for a successful outcome. We set out to determine the effect of preoperative depression on postoperative return to work in patients undergoing transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) for degenerative spondylolisthesis. METHODS: Fifty-eight patients undergoing TLIF for symptomatic grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis were included in this analysis. Patient demographics, clinical presentation, indications for surgery, radiologic studies, and operative variables were assessed for each case. Patient-assessed outcome measures were obtained prospectively at baseline and 2 years postoperatively. To understand the factors associated with prolonged return to work, univariate linear regression analysis and stepwise multivariate Cox proportional hazards model was used. RESULTS: All patient-reported outcomes assessed were significantly improved 2 years after TLIF (P < 0.001). Of the 32 patients working preoperatively, 26 (81%) returned to work postoperatively. Median time to return to work was 56 days (range, 10-150 days). Independent of patient age; preoperative pain, disability, and quality of life; and extent of postoperative improvement, increased preoperative Zung depression score remained associated with prolonged return to work (P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Independent of postoperative improvement in pain, disability, and quality of life, the extent of preoperative depression was an independent predictor of time to return to work in patients undergoing TLIF for spondylolisthesis, suggesting that regardless of how successful TLIF surgery may be at improving a patient's pain, disability, or quality of life, greater depression will delay or prohibit their ability to return to work postoperatively.

Management of catastrophising and kinesiophobia improves rehabilitation after fusion for lumbar spondylolisthesis and stenosis. A randomised controlled trial.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of a rehabilitation programme including the management of catastrophising and kinesiophobia on disability, dysfunctional thoughts, pain, and the quality of life in patients after lumbar fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis and/or lumbar spinal stenosis. METHODS: This was a parallel-group, randomised, superiority-controlled study in which 130 patients were randomly assigned to a programme consisting of exercises and cognitive-behavioural therapy (experimental group, 65 subjects) or exercises alone (control group, 65 subjects). Before treatment (T1), 4 weeks later (post-treatment analysis, T2) and 12 months after the end of treatment (follow-up, T3), all the patients completed a booklet containing the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI, primary outcome), the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia, the Pain Catastrophising Scale, a pain Numerical Rating Scale, and the Short-Form Health Survey. A linear mixed model for repeated measures was used for each outcome measure. RESULTS: The ODI linear mixed model revealed significant main effects of group (F(1,122.8) = 95.78, p < 0.001) and time (F(2,120.1) = 432.02, p < 0.001) in favour of the experimental group. There was a significant group × time interaction effect (F(2,120.1) = 20.37, p < 0.001). The analyses of all of the secondary outcome measures revealed a significant effect of time, group and interaction in favour of the experimental group. CONCLUSION: The rehabilitation programme, including the management of catastrophising and kinesiophobia, was superior to the exercise programme in reducing disability, dysfunctional thoughts, and pain, and enhancing the quality of life of patients after lumbar fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis and/or LSS. The effects lasted for at least 1 year after the intervention ended.

Early rehabilitation targeting cognition, behavior, and motor function after lumbar fusion: a randomized controlled trial.

STUDY DESIGN: Open label randomized controlled trial with 3-, 6-, 12-month, and 2- to 3-year follow-up. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effectiveness of a psychomotor therapy focusing on cognition, behavior, and motor relearning compared with exercise therapy applied during the first 3 months after lumbar fusion. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Postoperative management after lumbar fusion commonly focuses on analgesic pain control and activities of daily living. After 3 months, exercise therapy is often implemented. No randomized controlled trial has investigated early rehabilitation techniques conducted during the first 3 months after surgery. METHODS: The study recruited 107 patients, aged 18 to 65 years, selected for lumbar fusion because of 12 months of symptomatic spinal stenosis, spondylosis, degenerative/isthmic spondylolisthesis, or degenerative disc disease. The exercise therapy group received a home program focusing on pain contingent training of back, abdominal, and leg muscle functional strength and endurance, stretching, and cardiovascular fitness. The psychomotor therapy group received a home program and 3 outpatient sessions focusing on modifying maladaptive pain cognitions, behaviors, and motor control.Rated questionnaires investigating functional disability, pain, health-related quality of life, functional self-efficacy, outcome expectancy, fear of movement/(re)injury, and coping were assessed at 3, 6, 12 months, and 2 to 3 years after surgery. RESULTS: Follow-up rates were 93% at 12 months and 81% at 2 to 3 years after surgery. Psychomotor therapy improved functional disability, self-efficacy, outcome expectancy, and fear of movement/(re)injury significantly more than exercise therapy at respective follow-up occasions. Similar results occurred for pain coping but group differences were nonsignificant at 2 to 3 years follow-up. Potentially clinical relevant higher reoperation rates occurred after psychomotor therapy but rates were within normal ranges. CONCLUSION: The study shows that postoperative rehabilitation can be safely implemented during the first 3 months after lumbar fusion and should include measures to modify psychological as well as motor functions.

Long-term health-related quality of life after surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and spondylolisthesis.

BACKGROUND: The aim of surgical treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis is primarily to prevent progression and secondarily to correct the deformity, whereas the goal of surgical treatment of pediatric spondylolisthesis is mainly to relieve pain and, in patients with a high-grade slip, to prevent progression. The aim of this study was to compare the long-term health-related quality of life after surgery for idiopathic scoliosis and spondylolisthesis in adolescence. METHODS: One hundred and ninety patients, with a mean age of fifteen years, who were treated surgically for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis and 270 patients, with a mean age of sixteen years, who were treated surgically for low-grade or high-grade spondylolisthesis participated in the present study. The mean duration of follow-up was 14.8 years for the scoliosis group and 17.0 years for the spondylolisthesis group. Radiographs were made preoperatively, at the time of the two-year follow-up, and at the time of the final follow-up. Additionally, a physical examination was performed, and the Scoliosis Research Society-24 and Short Form-36 questionnaires were completed at the final follow-up evaluation. RESULTS: The median total score on the Scoliosis Research Society questionnaire was 102 (range, 63 to 118) for the scoliosis group and 95 (range, 42 to 115) for the spondylolisthesis group (p < 0.001). After adjusting for age at the time of surgery, gender, and duration of follow-up, the patients with scoliosis had a significantly higher odds ratio for a good total score (> or = 90 points) on the Scoliosis Research Society questionnaire than did patients with spondylolisthesis (odds ratio, 2.65 [95% confidence interval, 1.58 to 4.44]; p = 0.0002). Patients in the scoliosis group had better values for general self-image, postoperative self-image, and postoperative function than did patients in the spondylolisthesis group (p < 0.001). Sixteen patients in both groups reported that they had back pain often or very often at rest. The standardized physical component scale on the Short Form-36 yielded slightly but significantly better values for the scoliosis group (median, 53.8 points; range, 32 to 61 points) compared with the spondylolisthesis group (median, 53.4 points; range, 27 to 59 points) (p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Patients have good long-term health-related quality of life after surgery for idiopathic scoliosis and spondylolisthesis in adolescence. Patients who have surgery for idiopathic scoliosis are likely to have better long-term outcomes than are patients who have surgery for spondylolisthesis. It is possible that back pain in adolescence may affect quality of life more than spinal deformity does.

No difference in clinical outcome after posterolateral lumbar fusion between patients with isthmic spondylolisthesis and those with degenerative disc disease using pedicle screw instrumentation: a comparative study of 112 patients with 4 years of follow-up.

We compared the clinical outcome after spinal fusion between patients with isthmic spondylolisthesis and those with degenerative disc disease of the lumbar spine, using multiple logistic regression analysis. A questionnaire describing medication, pain, vocational status and patient satisfaction was mailed to all the patients at a median interval of 4 years after their operation. Fusion was evaluated on plain radiographs at a minimum of 12 months after surgery, and patients were classified as fused or not fused. The overall satisfaction rate was 70%. The results of the present study showed no difference in the outcome after spinal fusion between the two groups of patients. The factors that significantly increased the likelihood of an optimal result - defined as patient satisfaction, return to work, and reduced medication - were male gender, being in work prior to surgery, and being a non-smoker. Since spinal fusion is an expensive treatment with potentially serious risks, and leaves one-third of the patients with an unsatisfactory result, we believe that more studies focusing on the indications for surgery should be performed.

Long-term disability assessment after surgical treatment of low grade spondylolisthesis.

The aim of this study was to determine whether assessment of back surgery with disability scores is relevant. We also attempted to answer the question of whether this evaluation should be conducted by a surgeon or a medical doctor. This retrospective study analyzes the long-term outcome (average follow-up 7 years, range: 3-12) of 40 patients (mean age: 46.2 years) treated by posterior surgical decompression, posterolateral arthrodesis, with or without instrumentation, for symptomatic low-grade spondylolisthesis. All patients were interviewed postoperatively and examined the same day by an orthopedic surgeon, who was not involved in the patients' treatment, as well as by a medical doctor rehabilitation specialist. Impairment was assessed by a standardized clinical examination and by visual analog scales (VAS) of pain. Disability was assessed using two scales: the Quebec disability scale and the Beaujon scale. Anxiety and depression were assessed with a validated specific questionnaire (HAD). Patient's perceived handicap was assessed on a 100-mm VAS. Our results show that the scores of the two disability scales were highly correlated with the patient's overall satisfaction ( r = 0.73 and 0.77 for the Quebec scale and the Beaujon scale, respectively). The intraclass correlation coefficient showed very good or excellent correlation between the data collected by the surgeon and the rehabilitation specialist, ranging from 0.8 to 0.97. This finding clearly demonstrates that interview by a surgeon who is not involved in the patient's treatment does not influence the patient's assessment in terms of impairment, disability, or handicap. Moreover, our results suggest that disability scales are the most relevant outcome measures in the assessment of spine surgery.