Simulation Training for Emergency Sternotomy in the Cardiovascular Intensive Care Unit.

BACKGROUND: Emergency resternotomy in the intensive care unit for a patient who has undergone cardiac surgery can be daunting for surgeons and critical care staff. Clinicians involved are often unfamiliar with the surgical instruments and techniques needed. LOCAL PROBLEM: After an emergency intensive care unit resternotomy resulted in suboptimal performance and outcome, protocols for emergency resternotomy were established and improved. METHODS: Education and simulation training were used to improve staff comfort and familiarity with the needed techniques and supplies. The training intervention included simulations to provide hands-on experience, improve staff familiarity with resternotomy trays, and streamline emergency sternotomy protocols. Preintervention and postintervention surveys were used to assess participants' familiarity with the implemented plans and algorithms. RESULTS: All 44 participants (100%) completed the preintervention survey, and 41 of 44 participants (93%) returned the postintervention survey. After the intervention, 95% of respondents agreed that they were prepared to be members of the team for an emergency intensive care unit sternotomy, compared with 52% of respondents before the intervention. After the intervention, 95% of respondents strongly agreed or agreed that they could identify patients who might need emergency sternotomy, compared with 50% before the intervention. The results also showed improvement in staff members' understanding of team roles, activation and use of the emergency sternotomy protocol, and differences between guidelines for resuscitating patients who experience cardiac arrest after cardiac surgery and the post-cardiac arrest Advanced Cardiovascular Life Support protocol. CONCLUSION: Results of this quality improvement project suggest that simulation training improves staff comfort with and understanding of emergency resternotomy.

High-Risk Reoperative Sternotomy-How We Do It, How We Teach It.

With the increasing number of congenital heart disease patients living into adulthood and requiring reoperations, learning a safe and efficient reoperative sternotomy is essential. This article provides insight into the successful reoperative sternotomy, including preoperative evaluation, assessing risk for cardiac injury and preparations to take depending on the level of risk, safeguards taken before and during the sternotomy, and pearls and pitfalls in managing untoward events.

Creation and Global Deployment of a Mobile, Application-Based Cognitive Simulator for Cardiac Surgical Procedures.

Several modern learning frameworks (eg, cognitive apprenticeship, anchored instruction, and situated cognition) posit the utility of nontraditional methods for effective experiential learning. Thus, development of novel educational tools emphasizing the cognitive framework of operative sequences may be of benefit to surgical trainees. We propose the development and global deployment of an effective, mobile cognitive cardiac surgical simulator. In methods, 16 preclinical medical students were assessed. Overall, 4 separate surgical modules (sternotomy, cannulation, decannulation, and sternal closure) were created utilizing the Touch Surgery (London, UK) platform. Modules were made available to download free of charge for use on mobile devices. Usage data were collected over a 6-month period. Educational efficacy of the modules was evaluated by randomizing a cohort of medical students to either module usage or traditional, reading-based self-study, followed by a multiple-choice learning assessment tool. In results, downloads of the simulator achieved global penetrance, with highest usage in the USA, Brazil, Italy, UK, and India. Overall, 5368 unique users conducted a total of 1971 hours of simulation. Evaluation of the medical student cohort revealed significantly higher assessment scores in those randomized to module use versus traditional reading (75% ± 9% vs 61% ± 7%, respectively; P < 0.05). In conclusion, this study represents the first effort to create a mobile, interactive cognitive simulator for cardiac surgery. Simulators of this type may be effective for the training and assessment of surgical students. We investigated whether an interactive, mobile-computing-based cognitive task simulator for cardiac surgery could be developed, deployed, and validated. Our findings suggest that such simulators may be a useful learning tool.

Current era minimally invasive aortic valve replacement: techniques and practice.

BACKGROUND: Since the first aortic valve replacement through a right thoracotomy was reported in 1993, upper hemisternotomy and right anterior thoracotomy have become the predominant approaches for minimally invasive aortic valve replacement. Clinical studies have documented equivalent operative mortality, less bleeding, and reduced intensive care/hospital stay compared with conventional sternotomy despite longer procedure times. However, comparative trials face challenges due to patient preference, surgeon bias, and the lack of a standardized minimally invasive surgical approach. METHODS: Twenty cardiothoracic surgeons from 19 institutions across the United States, with a combined experience of nearly 5000 minimally invasive aortic valve replacement operations, formed a working group to develop a basis for a standardized approach to patient evaluation, operative technique, and postoperative care. In addition, a stepwise learning program for surgeons was outlined. RESULTS: Improved cosmesis, less pain and narcotic use, and faster recovery have been reported and generally accepted by patients and by surgeons performing minimally invasive aortic valve replacement. These benefits are more likely to be verified with standardization of the procedure itself, which will greatly facilitate the design and implementation of future clinical studies. CONCLUSIONS: Surgeons interested in learning and performing minimally invasive aortic valve replacement must have expertise in conventional aortic valve replacement at centers with adequate case volumes. A team approach that coordinates efforts of the surgeon, anesthesiologist, perfusionist, and nurses is required to achieve the best clinical outcomes. By first developing fundamental minimally invasive skills using specialized cannulation techniques, neck lines, and long-shafted instruments in the setting of conventional full sternotomy, the safest operative environment is afforded to patients.