[Liver injury caused by exposure to silica and 2,2-dichloro-1,1,1-trifluoroethane (HCFC-123):a case report].

This case report presents two males with drug-induced liver injury acquired from working at a glass factory dealing with silica and 2,2-dichloro-1,1,1-trifluoroethane (HCFC-123). Within one month of work, both patients presented with fever, icterus with liver dysfunction, and eosinophilia. Case 1 had experienced recurrence of symptoms twice while working and showed positive results for the drug-induced lymphocyte stimulation test (DLST). Meanwhile, case 2 was diagnosed by liver biopsy and clinical course but was negative for DLST. Hazard of exposure to non-crystalline silica is low, but drug-induced liver injury after exposure to HCFC-123 has been reported. Allergic liver injury is also caused by chemical substances;however, the insight into whether this injury is caused by exposure to silica or HCFC-123 remains unclear. Further studies are required to examine the influence of silica and HCFC-123 on drug-induced liver injury among glass-factory employees.

Acute liver failure caused by occupational exposure to HCFC-123: Two case reports.

RATIONALE: Hydrochlorofluorocarbon 123 (HCFC-123, Freon123; 2,2-dichloro-1,1,1-trifluoroethane) has been widely used in refrigeration and heat-transfer applications as a substitute for chlorofluorocarbons due to its lower ozone-depleting potentials. Occupational exposure to HCFC-123 may cause mild reversible hepatoxicity, but no fatal cases have been reported yet. PATIENT CONCERNS: In this report, we present cases of severe hepatitis with fatal outcome by HCFC-123. Two industrial workers from a manufacturing factory of fire extinguishers which use HCFC-123 were presented with diarrhea, fever, myalgia, and jaundice. Patients had been repeatedly exposed to the liquid form of HCFC-123 for the past three weeks before flare of symptoms. DIAGNOSIS: The blood biochemistry tests showed acute cholestatic hepatitis and liver biopsy findings indicated inflammatory hepatocellular injury. The diagnosis of HCFC-123 induced hepatitis was made. INTERVENTIONS: The treatment for both patients were generally supportive. The second patient went through hemodialysis, ventilatory care, and artificial liver support therapy (molecular adsorbent recirculating system) at intensive care unit. OUTCOMES: One patient recovered uneventfully, whereas the other patient showed rapid deterioration leading to acute liver failure complicated with cerebral edema, subdural hemorrhage, and death on hospital day 10. LESSONS: The HCFC-123-induced hepatitis showed similarities with halothane hepatitis, both of which may share pathophysiologic mechanisms. Exposure to HCFC-123 needs to be listed as a potential cause of acute liver failure, and to be considered in patients with acute hepatitis of uncertain etiology and negative viral serology.