Failure to investigate anaesthetic anaphylaxis resulting in a preventable second anaphylactic reaction.

We present a case of anaphylaxis to suxamethonium and/or vecuronium in a patient who had previously suffered an anaphylactic reaction, presumably to rocuronium. The patient had not been referred for formal allergy testing after the first anaphylactic reaction. Subsequent formal allergy testing revealed sensitivities to suxamethonium, rocuronium and vecuronium. Her next anaesthetic, using cisatracurium, was uneventful. It is recommended that all patients with suspected perioperative anaphylaxis are referred for testing. This is the responsibility of the anaesthetist. Particular caution should be used with suspected neuromuscular blocking drug allergy as cross-reactivity is common and not predictable by drug structure.

[Anaphylactic shock from succinylcholine, complicated by a rhabdomyolysis]. / Choc anaphylactique dû à la succinylcholine compliqué de rhabdomyolyse.

A young woman, with a contact dermatitis to nickel, experienced a life threatening anaphylaxis after induction of general anaesthesia for an emergency curettage. Hypersensitivity reaction involving IgE antibodies against succinylcholine was proven by positive skin test and radioimmunoassay detection of antibodies against succinylcholine and quaternary ammonium. After restoration of haemodynamics in a few hours, the patient had rhabdomyolysis predominant at lower left leg, which required a fasciotomy. An haemodialysis session was necessary, renal function being normalized thereafter. Several months later, the patient suffers from dysesthesia on the leg and foot. Muscular ischaemia was the consequence of the shock, the external compression due to the compression stockings probably being an additional factor.

Immunoglobulin E antibodies to rocuronium: a new diagnostic tool.

BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of allergy from neuromuscular blocking agents is not always straightforward. The objectives of the current study were to investigate the value of quantification of immunoglobulin E (IgE) by ImmunoCAP (Phadia AB, Uppsala, Sweden) in the diagnosis of rocuronium allergy and to study whether IgE inhibition tests can predict clinical cross-reactivity between neuromuscular blocking agents. METHODS: Twenty-five rocuronium-allergic patients and 30 control individuals exposed to rocuronium during uneventful anesthesia were included. Thirty-two sera (total IgE > 1,500 kU/l) were analyzed for potential interference of elevated total IgE titers. Results were compared with quantification of IgE for suxamethonium, morphine, and pholcodine. Cross-reactivity between drugs was assessed by IgE inhibition and skin tests. RESULTS: Sensitivity of IgE for rocuronium, suxamethonium, morphine, and pholcodine was 68, 60, 88, and 86%, respectively. Specificity was 100% for suxamethonium, morphine, and pholcodine IgE and 93% for rocuronium IgE. ROC analysis between patients and control individuals changed the threshold to 0.13 kUa/l for rocuronium, 0.11 kUa/l for suxamethonium, 0.36 kUa/l for morphine, and 0.43 kUa/l for pholcodine. Corresponding sensitivity was 92, 72, 88, and 86%, respectively. Specificity was unaltered. Interference of elevated total IgE with quantification of IgE was demonstrated by the analysis in sera with a total IgE greater than 1,500 kU/l. IgE inhibition did not predict clinical relevant cross-reactivity. CONCLUSIONS: The rocuronium ImmunoCAP constitutes a reliable technique to diagnose rocuronium allergy, provided an assay-specific decision threshold is applied. IgE assays based on compounds bearing ammonium epitopes are confirmed to represent reliable tools to diagnose rocuronium allergy. High total IgE titers were observed to affect specificity of the assays.

No consumption of IgE antibody in serum during allergic drug anaphylaxis.

BACKGROUND: The general understanding is that a blood sample for analysis of immunoglobulin (Ig) E antibodies to an allergen suspected to cause an anaphylaxis cannot be drawn until several weeks after the reaction. As this is most unpractical, the changes in IgE antibody levels during anaphylaxis were studied to evaluate the possibility of using samples drawn at the time of the reaction. METHODS: Immunoglobulin E antibodies to suxamethonium were quantitated with ImmunoCAP before, during and after an anaphylactic reaction occurring during anaesthesia using neuromuscular blocking agents. RESULTS: Serum IgE antibody concentrations against suxamethonium in blood samples collected up to 6 h after the reaction were not different from those in samples drawn before or days and weeks after the anaphylaxis. CONCLUSIONS: A serum sample intended to trace the drug involved in an IgE-mediated anaphylactic reaction can be drawn in direct relation to the reaction.

Delayed allergic reaction to suxamethonium driven by oligoclonal Th1-skewed CD4+CCR4+IFN-gamma+ memory T cells.

BACKGROUND: Muscle relaxants represent the drugs most frequently involved in intraoperative anaphylaxis during surgical procedures. Our aim was to report the case of a delayed reaction to suxamethonium and analyze specific T cell lines with regard to their specificity, phenotype and cytokine profile. METHODS: We generated a drug-specific T cell line from a biopsy at the site of positive intradermal reactions and analyzed the immunophenotype, T cell receptor Vbeta domain expression and cytokine profile. RESULTS: T cells isolated from positive intradermal test reactions to suxamethonium showed a strict dose-dependent proliferation in response to drug-pulsed autologous antigen-presenting cells. The drug-specific CD4+ T cells were oligoclonal memory CD3+CD4+ T cells and expressed the skin homing receptors cutaneous lymphocyte antigen (CLA) and CCR4. Furthermore CD4+ suxamethonium-reactive T cell lines were IFN-gamma-positive and synthesized high levels of IFN-gamma and TNF-alpha. CONCLUSION: The study describes a delayed hypersensitivity to suxamethonium, driven by an oligoclonal T helper cell 1-skewed CD4+ memory T cell population, expressing the skin homing receptors CLA and CCR4.

Screening for mast cell tryptase and serum IgE antibodies in 18 patients with anaphylactic shock during general anaesthesia.

BACKGROUND: In the perioperative setting multiple agents can cause anaphylaxis. Often the reactions are dramatic, and due to their lifethreatening potential it is crucial that the responsible agent is identified in order to avoid future adverse reactions. The aim of the present study was to measure the concentration of serum mast cell tryptase (MCT), to investigate the prevalence of serum IgE antibodies against ammonium groups, choline, morphine, suxamethonium, thiopentone and latex and to perform skin prick tests (SPTs) in 18 patients experiencing an anaphylactic reaction during induction of general anaesthesia. METHODS: Serum samples from 18 patients with an anaphylactic reaction during general anaesthesia were analyzed for MCT and specific IgE against ammonium groups, choline, morphine, suxamethonium, thiopentone and latex. Skin prick tests were performed in 11 out of 18 patients. RESULTS: Ten patients had elevated MCT levels and specific IgE against ammonium ion, morphine and (with the exception of patient nos 3, 9 and 10) suxamethonium. Seven of these patients had positive SPTs to suxamethonium. One of the patients tested positive to latex in addition to suxamethonium. Two patients showed elevated MCT, while specific IgE against the drugs tested was not detected. Three patients tested positive to ammonium ion, morphine and suxamethonium, but negative to MCT. Three patients tested negative to both MCT and specific IgE. CONCLUSIONS: Fifteen out of 18 sera tested positive for MCT and/or specific IgE against neuromuscular blocking drugs (NMBDs). Ten of the 18 patients experienced an IgE-mediated anaphylactic reaction to NMBDs during anaesthesia, verified by detection of specific IgE and elevated levels of MCT.

Adverse effects of neuromuscular blockers and their antagonists.

Among all the drugs used for general anesthesia, neuromuscular blockers appear to play a prominent role in the incidence of severe adverse reactions. It now seems likely that most serious adverse drug reactions occurring during anesthesia are immunological in type. The frequency of life-threatening anaphylactic or anaphylactoid reactions occurring during anesthesia has been estimated to be between 1 in 1000 and 1 in 25,000 anesthetic procedures, with the neuromuscular blockers being involved in 80% of cases. The mortality from such serious reactions is reported to be in the range of 3.4 to 6%. The highly immunogenic drug, suxamethonium chloride (succinylcholine), was found to be the most hazardous agent. Drug-specific immunoglobulin E antibodies to suxamethonium chloride and other neuromuscular blockers have been demonstrated. This sensitivity to neuromuscular blockers seems to be a long-lasting phenomenon. During anesthesia, the clinical features of an allergic reaction are often masked. Tachycardia and circulatory collapse may be the only signs of an allergic reaction, and they are easily misdiagnosed. Bronchospasm is reported to be present in about 40% of cases. Successful management of these patients includes stabilisation during the acute reaction and avoidance of future reactions. The latter is based on the identification of the causative drug and potentially cross-reacting compounds. The use of suxamethonium chloride is associated with many other adverse effects, such as fasciculations, myalgia, potassium release, changes in the heart rate, increases in intragastric and intraocular pressures, and malignant hyperthermia. Because of the dangers of hyperkalemic cardiac arrest suxamethonium chloride administration in children with unrecognised muscular dystrophy, there have now been moves to limit the use of this drug in children. Although neuromuscular blockers are designed to specifically block nicotinic cholinergic receptors at the neuromuscular junction, many bind to muscarinic cholinergic receptors on ganglia and smooth muscle, and alter parasympathetically mediated heart rate and airway calibre. Most benzylisoquinolinium muscle relaxants can induce histamine release, especially when they are administered rapidly, which can lead to disturbances of cardiovascular function. In addition, nondepolarising neuromuscular blockers have been implicated in causing generalised weakness following their long term administration to patients on an intensive care unit. The problem with these adverse drug reactions is their upredictable nature. Therefore, prompt recognition with appropriate therapy can help to improve the outcome.

Polyclonal antibodies to domoic acid, and their use in immunoassays for domoic acid in sea water and shellfish.

Ovine antibodies raised against conjugates linked through the secondary amino group of domoic acid (1) were used, together with activated-ester-derived conjugates of domoic acid (DA) as the plate coater, to develop a robust indirect competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (cELISA) for DA in shellfish and seawater. The ELISA was used to analyze shellfish samples for DA, and was compatible with several extraction procedures. The ELISA had a detection limit below 0.01 ng ml(-1), a limit of quantitation (LOQ) of 0.15 ng ml(-1) and a working range of 0.15-15 ng ml(-1) DA. The LOQ is equivalent to 38 ng g(-1) DA in shellfish flesh, assuming a 250-fold dilution during extraction. This is more than 500 times lower than the maximum permitted level (20 microg g(-1) flesh). The ELISA is designed for use alongside regulatory analyses, and, following formal validation, should be available for pre-screening of regulatory shellfish flesh samples. The ELISA was also shown to be appropriate for analysis of DA in algal cultures and in samples of seawater, and thus has the potential to provide early warning of developing algal blooms.