Economic Analysis Based on the Use of Closed-Incision Negative-Pressure Therapy after Postoperative Breast Reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer accounts for 30% of all new cancer diagnoses in women. Although more options are now available regarding breast reconstruction, the risk of complications (eg, infection, dehiscence, and expander exposure) is also prevalent and must be considered when choosing a reconstruction option because the cost for complications can be substantial. METHODS: A hypothetical cost model was applied to clinical outcomes of a previous retrospective study comparing the use of closed-incision negative-pressure therapy (ciNPT) and standard of care (SOC) over breast incisions after immediate reconstruction. The adjusted complication cost for a mastectomy with reconstruction was a mean of $10,402 and was calculated using a database of inpatient, outpatient, and carrier claims. RESULTS: The previous retrospective study included data on 665 breasts (ciNPT = 331, SOC = 334) and 356 female patients (ciNPT = 177, SOC = 179) and reported on complication rates at the breast level: 8.5% (28/331) for the ciNPT breast group versus 15.9% (53/334) for the SOC group (P = 0.0092). In the ciNPT group, 24/177 patients (13.6%) had a complication, whereas in the SOC group, 38/179 patients (21.2%) had a complication. Based on the adjusted mean complication cost of $10,402, total complication cost for the ciNPT group was $250,000 versus $395,000 for the SOC group with a per-patient cost savings of $218.00 with ciNPT. CONCLUSION: The authors' preliminary findings show potential cost savings with the use of ciNPT over breast incisions and warrant further study regarding the cost-effectiveness of ciNPT compared with standard of care after immediate breast reconstruction.

Costs and outcomes in evaluating management of unhealed surgical wounds in the community in clinical practice in the UK: a cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the patient pathways and associated health outcomes, resource use and corresponding costs attributable to managing unhealed surgical wounds in clinical practice, from initial presentation in the community in the UK. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort analysis of the records of 707 patients in The Health Improvement Network (THIN) database whose wound failed to heal within 4 weeks of their surgery. Patients' characteristics, wound-related health outcomes and healthcare resource use were quantified, and the total National Health Service (NHS) cost of patient management was estimated at 2015/2016 prices. RESULTS: Inconsistent terminology was used in describing the wounds. 83% of all wounds healed within 12 months from onset of community management, ranging from 86% to 74% of wounds arising from planned and emergency procedures, respectively. Mean time to healing was 4 months per patient. Patients were predominantly managed in the community by nurses and only around a half of all patients who still had a wound at 3 months were recorded as having had a follow-up visit with their surgeon. Up to 68% of all wounds may have been clinically infected at the time of presentation, and 23% of patients subsequently developed a putative wound infection a mean 4 months after initial presentation. Mean NHS cost of wound care over 12 months was £7300 per wound, ranging from £6000 to £13 700 per healed and unhealed wound, respectively. Additionally, the mean NHS cost of managing a wound without any evidence of infection was ~£2000 and the conflated cost of managing a wound with a putative infection ranged from £5000 to £11 200. CONCLUSION: Surgeons are unlikely to be fully aware of the problems surrounding unhealed surgical wounds once patients are discharged into the community, due to inconsistent recording in patients' records coupled with the low rate of follow-up appointments. These findings offer the best evidence available with which to inform policy and budgetary decisions pertaining to managing unhealed surgical wounds in the community.

Scoping Review of Clinical Outcomes Related to Advanced Training in Wound Care.

INTRODUCTION: There are different levels of wound education which exist amongst healthcare providers treating wounds. It is unknown if advanced wound training can lead to improved clinical outcomes. PURPOSE: To review and summarize existing literature focused on the impact of different healthcare professionals with advanced wound care training and the associated effect of clinical outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The methods used to conduct this scoping review are based on the methodological framework developed by Arksey and O'Malley. An electronic search was performed by independent reviewers using Scopus, CINAHL, PubMed, Google, and EWMA. Consensus decision-making amongst the reviewers resulted in relevant final articles being selected for review. RESULTS: In the literature, there is no universally accepted definition for advanced training in wound care. Seven of the eight selected articles focused on nurses with a specialization in wound healing and their impact on wound healing outcomes. The five main themes identified were wound improvement, cost savings, influence on other nurses, wound recurrence rate, and advanced education. CONCLUSION: A minimum level of advanced training or education would be beneficial to ensure consistency in the provision of advanced wound care by professionals practicing wound care.

Primary Closure of Wide Fasciotomy and Surgical Wounds Using Rubber Band-Assisted External Tissue Expansion: A Simple, Safe, and Cost-effective Technique.

BACKGROUND: Although decompressive fasciotomy is a limb-saving procedure in the setting of acute compartment syndrome, it leaves a large wound defect with tissue edema and skin retraction that can preclude primary closure. Numerous techniques have been described to address the challenge of closing fasciotomy wounds. This study reports our experience with fasciotomy closure using rubber bands (RBs) for external tissue expansion. METHODS: Patients were informed about RB closure and split-thickness skin graft options. Only patients who opted for RB closure and had wounds that could not be approximated using the pinch test underwent the procedure. Starting from the apex and progressively advancing, the RBs were applied to the skin edges at 3 to 4 mm intervals using staples. The RBs were advanced by twisting back-and-forth to create a criss-cross pattern. One week after application, fasciotomy wounds were closed primarily or underwent further RB application, based on clinical assessment of adequacy of skin advancement, compartment tension, and perfusion. Review of a prospectively maintained database was performed, including demographics, comorbidities, etiology, wound and operative details, hospital stay, and complications. RESULTS: Seventeen consecutive patients with 25 wounds (22 fasciotomy and 3 other surgical wounds) were treated using the RB technique. Average wound length and width measured 15.7 cm (range, 5-32 cm) and 5.2 cm (range, 1-12 cm), respectively. Locations of wounds included forearm (n = 12, 48.0%), leg (n = 7, 28.0%), hand (n = 4, 16.0%), elbow (n = 1, 4.0%), and hip (n = 1, 4.0%). Eighteen of 25 wounds (72.0%) were closed primarily after 1 RB application. Additional RB application was required for 5 wounds to achieve primary closure. Between stages, patients were discharged home if they did not have other conditions requiring in-hospital stay. No complications were observed, and no revision surgeries were required. Patient satisfaction was 100%, and all indicated that they would choose the RB technique over skin grafting. CONCLUSIONS: The modified RB technique is a simple, safe, and cost-effective alternative for treating fasciotomy and other surgical defects resulting in high patient satisfaction and good cosmetic outcome, without the need for split-thickness skin graft or flap coverage.

Self-care and postoperative dressing management.

As the increasing burden on healthcare costs continues to rise, posing clinical and financial challenges for all healthcare providers attempting to provide optimal, evidence-based wound care, the situation appears to be reaching the tipping point with regard to reduced resources, increasing patient groups with complex wounds and financial restraints. It is clearly time for action and new ways of working that include empowering patients and carers to take appropriate ownership within their personal wound-care journey. This observational evaluation explores 10 community-based patients presenting with postoperative acute surgical wounds; it examines and evaluates the patients' experience with regard to self-care satisfaction, Leukomed Control product satisfaction and actual traditional/personal costs incurred up to a 4-week period. The evaluation highlights not only an overall positive improvement within patient satisfaction and experience, alongside optimised wound progression and related cost savings, but also offers a valuable insight into the promotion and success of patients taking ownership of their wound-care journey.

Surgical wound dehiscence in an Australian community nursing service: time and cost to healing.

OBJECTIVE: Surgical wound dehiscence (SWD) increases the length of hospital stay and impacts on patient wellbeing and health-care costs. Globally, the health-care costs associated with SWD are poorly reported and those reported are frequently associated with surgical site infection (SSI), rather than dehiscence of non-microbial cause. This retrospective study describes and reports on the costs and time to healing associated with a number of surgical patients who were referred to a community nursing service for treatment of an SWD following discharge from a metropolitan hospital, in Perth, Western Australia. METHOD: Descriptive statistical analysis was carried out to describe the patient, wound and treatment characteristics. A costing analysis was conducted to investigate the cost of healing these wounds. RESULTS: Among the 70 patients referred with a SWD, 55% were treated for an infected wound dehiscence which was a significant factor (p=0.001). Overall, the cost of treating the 70 patients with a SWD in a community nursing service was in excess of $56,000 Australian dollars (AUD) (£28,705) and did not include organisational overheads or travel costs for nurse visits. The management of infection contributed to 67% of the overall cost. CONCLUSION: SWD remains an unquantified aspect of wound care from a prevalence and fiscal point of view. Further work needs to be done in the identification of SWD and which patients may be 'at risk'. DECLARATION OF INTEREST: The authors declare they have no competing interests.