Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 1.841
Filtrar
1.
MSMR ; 31(5): 2-8, 2024 May 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38847619

RESUMO

Mortality surveillance is an important activity for capturing information on a population's health. This retrospective surveillance analysis utilizes administrative data sources to describe active duty U.S. Army soldiers who died from 2014 to 2019, and calculate mortality rates, assess trends by category of death, and identify leading causes of death within subpopulations. During the surveillance period, 2,530 soldier deaths were reported. The highest crude mortality rates observed during the 6-year surveillance period were for deaths by suicide, followed by accidental (i.e., unintentional injury) deaths. The crude mortality rates for natural deaths decreased significantly over the 6-year period, by an average of 6% annually. The leading causes of death were suicide by gunshot wound, motor vehicle accidents, suicide by hanging, neoplasms, and cardiovascular events. Significant differences were observed in the leading causes of death in relation to demographic characteristics, which has important implications for the development of focused educational campaigns to improve health behaviors and safe driving habits. Current public health programs to prevent suicide should be evaluated, with new approaches for firearm safety considered.


Assuntos
Causas de Morte , Militares , Vigilância da População , Suicídio , Humanos , Militares/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Feminino , Adulto , Adulto Jovem , Estudos Retrospectivos , Suicídio/estatística & dados numéricos , Mortalidade/tendências , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adolescente , Ferimentos por Arma de Fogo/mortalidade , Ferimentos por Arma de Fogo/epidemiologia , Acidentes de Trânsito/mortalidade , Acidentes de Trânsito/estatística & dados numéricos
2.
Pediatr Ann ; 53(6): e197-e199, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38852080

RESUMO

Gun violence is a rapidly growing concern for youth. As rates of death by firearm rise, so does exposure to firearm violence and high levels of accompanying morbidity. Although gun violence cannot be attributed to any one cause, it is important pediatric health care providers understand the prevalence of this issue. Additionally, the long-term health effects are profound with many victims of, and witnesses to, gun violence experiencing new symptoms of general anxiety disorder. There are numerous initiatives taking place at the individual, local, and national levels to address this public health crisis. An overview of such interventions is also presented. With better screening and treatment of upstream and downstream symptoms of youth gun violence, pediatricians can decrease the morbidity and mortality that results from firearm use. [Pediatr Ann. 2024;53(6):e197-e199.].


Assuntos
Violência com Arma de Fogo , Humanos , Violência com Arma de Fogo/prevenção & controle , Violência com Arma de Fogo/estatística & dados numéricos , Violência com Arma de Fogo/psicologia , Adolescente , Criança , Armas de Fogo , Ferimentos por Arma de Fogo/epidemiologia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
3.
BMC Microbiol ; 24(1): 166, 2024 May 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38755533

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Bullet-related bacterial wound infection can be caused by high-velocity bullets and shrapnel injuries. In Ethiopia, significant injuries were reported that may cause severe wound infections, persistent systemic infections and may lead to amputation and mortality. The magnitude, antimicrobial susceptibility profiles, and factors associated with bacterial wound infections among patients with bullet-related injuries are not yet studied particularly at health facilities in Bahir Dar, Northwest Ethiopia. Therefore, this study was aimed to determine the prevalence, bacterial profiles, antimicrobial susceptibility profiles, and factors associated with bacterial infections among patients with bullet-related injuries at referral health facilities in Bahir Dar, Northwest Ethiopia. METHODS: A Hospital-based cross-sectional study was conducted among patients with bullet-related injuries at three referral health facilities in Bahir Dar from May 25 to July 27, 2022. A total of 384 patients with bullet-related injuries were included in the study. Sociodemographic and clinical data were collected using a structured questionnaire. Wound swabs were collected aseptically and cultured on Blood and MacConkey agar following bacteriological standards. Biochemical tests were performed to differentiate bacteria for positive cultivation and antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of the isolates were done on Muller Hinton agar using the Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion technique according to the 2021 Clinical Laboratory Standard Institute (CLSI) guideline. The data were entered using Epi-Info version 7.3 and analyzed using SPSS version 25. Descriptive data were presented using frequency, percentages, figures, and charts. Logistic regression was carried out to identify factors associated with bacterial wound infections. P-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: The prevalence of bullet-related bacterial wound infection among three referral hospitals in Bahir Dar city was 54.7%. The most commonly isolated Gram-negative organism was Klebsiella spps 49 (23.3%) while among Gram-positive organism, Staphylococcus aureus 58 (27.6%) and coagulase-negative staphylococci (CONS) 18 (8.6%). Contamination, hospitalization and smoking habit were significantly associated with the presence of bullet-related bacterial wound infections. Over 97% multidrug resistant (MDR) bacterial isolates were identified and of theses, E. coli, Proteus species, Citrobactor, and Staphylococcus aureus were highly drug resistant. CONCLUSION: Increased prevalence of bullet-related bacterial wound infection was noticed in this study. S. aureus followed by Klebsiella species were most commonly isolated bacteria. High frequency of resistance to Ampicillin, Oxacillin, Cefepime, Ceftriaxone, Ceftazidime, Vancomycin, and Norfloxacin was observed. Therefore, proper handling of bullet injuries, prompt investigation of bacterial infections, monitoring of drug sensitivity patterns and antibiotic usage are critical.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos , Testes de Sensibilidade Microbiana , Infecção dos Ferimentos , Humanos , Etiópia/epidemiologia , Masculino , Estudos Transversais , Adulto , Feminino , Prevalência , Infecção dos Ferimentos/microbiologia , Infecção dos Ferimentos/epidemiologia , Antibacterianos/farmacologia , Adulto Jovem , Ferimentos por Arma de Fogo/epidemiologia , Ferimentos por Arma de Fogo/microbiologia , Infecções Bacterianas/epidemiologia , Infecções Bacterianas/microbiologia , Infecções Bacterianas/tratamento farmacológico , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Bactérias/efeitos dos fármacos , Bactérias/isolamento & purificação , Bactérias/classificação , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente
4.
BMC Public Health ; 24(1): 1221, 2024 May 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38698393

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Firearm violence is an intensifying public health problem in the United States. News reports shape the way the public and policy makers understand and respond to health threats, including firearm violence. To better understand how firearm violence is communicated to the public, we aimed to determine the extent to which firearm violence is framed as a public health problem on television news and to measure harmful news content as identified by firearm-injured people. METHODS: This is a quantitative content analysis of Philadelphia local television news stories about firearm violence using a database of 7,497 clips. We compiled a stratified sample of clips aired on two randomly selected days/month from January-June 2021 from the database (n = 192 clips). We created a codebook to measure public health frame elements and to assign a harmful content score for each story and then coded the clips. Characteristics of stories containing episodic frames that focus on single shooting events were compared to clips with thematic frames that include broader social context for violence. RESULTS: Most clips employed episodic frames (79.2%), presented law enforcement officials as primary narrators (50.5%), and included police imagery (79.2%). A total of 433 firearm-injured people were mentioned, with a mean of 2.8 individuals shot included in each story. Most of the firearm-injured people featured in the clips (67.4%) had no personal information presented apart from age and/or gender. The majority of clips (84.4%) contained at least one harmful content element. The mean harmful content score/clip was 2.6. Public health frame elements, including epidemiologic context, root causes, public health narrators and visuals, and solutions were missing from most clips. Thematic stories contained significantly more public health frame elements and less harmful content compared to episodic stories. CONCLUSIONS: Local television news produces limited public health coverage of firearm violence, and harmful content is common. This reporting likely compounds trauma experienced by firearm-injured people and could impede support for effective public health responses to firearm violence. Journalists should work to minimize harmful news content and adopt a public health approach to reporting on firearm violence.


Assuntos
Armas de Fogo , Saúde Pública , Televisão , Violência , Humanos , Philadelphia , Televisão/estatística & dados numéricos , Armas de Fogo/estatística & dados numéricos , Violência/estatística & dados numéricos , Violência/prevenção & controle , Ferimentos por Arma de Fogo/prevenção & controle , Ferimentos por Arma de Fogo/epidemiologia , Violência com Arma de Fogo/prevenção & controle , Violência com Arma de Fogo/estatística & dados numéricos
5.
Georgian Med News ; (348): 94-98, 2024 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38807400

RESUMO

Artificial intelligence (AI) encompasses the advancement of computers and robots, enabling them to surpass human capabilities in various aspects. By utilizing AI, programs have the ability to autonomously analyze and interpret data, offering information and executing actions without any human involvement. The ongoing war in Ukraine showed various aspects of severe gunshot injuries because of previously unknown course of wounds after application of ballistic missiles, drones, etc., which is frequently applied by russians. In such conditions, decision-making process by military medical doctors must be quick and rational, however in case of massive casualties, combined trauma (e.g. thoracoabdominal gunshot injury) MDs might have permanent challenges to apply appropriate care options and individualized approach. The aim of this study is to start the discussion about role and possible application of AI in management of gunshot injuries in combat patients or other individuals who received wounds relating to high-energy weapon. Conclusions. Gunshot wound is a clinical challenge in many cases among patients who were injured by high-energy weapons, requiring complex and quick decisions. AI might be applied as an additional tool for the decision-making process in case of severe trauma in deployed field hospitals, or in hospitals of higher Roles (3-4). This study is to start the research discussion about the utility of AI application for the management of the injured in the war associated with high-energy weapons.


Assuntos
Inteligência Artificial , Medicina Militar , Ferimentos por Arma de Fogo , Humanos , Ferimentos por Arma de Fogo/epidemiologia , Medicina Militar/métodos , Ucrânia
6.
JAMA ; 331(20): 1741-1747, 2024 05 28.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38703404

RESUMO

Importance: Youth (those aged <18 years) parental death has been associated with negative health outcomes. Understanding the burden of parental death due to drug poisoning (herein, drugs) and firearms is essential for informing interventions. Objective: To estimate the incidence of youth parental death due to drugs, firearms, and all other causes. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional observational study was conducted using vital registration, including all US decedents, and census data from January 1990 through December 2020. Data were analyzed from May 30, 2023, to March 28, 2024. Exposures: Parental death due to drug poisoning or firearms. Main Outcomes and Measures: A demographic matrix projection model was used to estimate the number and incidence of youth experiencing parental death, defined as the death of 1 or more parents, per 1000 population aged less than 18 years. Analyses evaluated parental deaths by drugs, firearms, and all other causes from 1999 through 2020 by race and ethnicity. Results: Between 1999 and 2020, there were 931 785 drug poisoning deaths and 736 779 firearm-related deaths with a mean (SD) age of 42.6 (16.3) years. Most deaths occurred among males (73.8%) and White decedents (70.8%) followed by Black (17.5%) and Hispanic (9.5%) decedents. An estimated 759 000 (95% CI, 722 000-800 000) youth experienced parental death due to drugs and an estimated 434 000 (95% CI, 409 000-460 000) youth experienced parental death due to firearms, accounting for 17% of all parental deaths. From 1999 to 2020, the estimated number of youth who experienced parental death increased 345% (95% CI, 334%-361%) due to drugs and 39% (95% CI, 37%-41%) due to firearms compared with 24% (95% CI, 23%-25%) due to all other causes. Black youth experienced a disproportionate burden of parental deaths, based primarily on firearm deaths among fathers. In 2020, drugs and firearms accounted for 23% of all parental deaths, double the proportion in 1999 (12%). Conclusions and Relevance: Results of this modeling study suggest that US youth are at high and increasing risk of experiencing parental death by drugs or firearms. Efforts to stem this problem should prioritize averting drug overdoses and firearm violence, especially among structurally marginalized groups.


Assuntos
Armas de Fogo , Morte Parental , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Estudos Transversais , Masculino , Feminino , Armas de Fogo/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Criança , Morte Parental/estatística & dados numéricos , Incidência , Causas de Morte , Ferimentos por Arma de Fogo/mortalidade , Ferimentos por Arma de Fogo/epidemiologia , Pré-Escolar , Overdose de Drogas/mortalidade , Overdose de Drogas/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem , Lactente , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Violência com Arma de Fogo/estatística & dados numéricos
7.
JAMA Netw Open ; 7(5): e2412535, 2024 May 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38776084

RESUMO

Importance: Reducing the pretrial detention population has been a cornerstone of movements to end mass incarceration. Across many US cities, there are ongoing public debates on policies that would end pretrial detention due to the inability to afford bail, with some raising concerns that doing so would increase community violence. Objective: To evaluate changes in firearm violence after New Jersey's 2017 bail reform policy that eliminated financial barriers to avoiding pretrial detention. Design, Setting, and Participants: This case-control study used synthetic control methods to examine changes in firearm mortality and combined fatal and nonfatal shootings in New Jersey (2014-2019). New Jersey was chosen because it was one of the first states to systematically implement cash bail reform. Outcomes in New Jersey were compared with a weighted combination of 36 states that did not implement any kind of reform to pretrial detention during the study period. Data were analyzed from April 2023 to March 2024. Exposure: Implementation of New Jersey's cash bail reform law in 2017. Main Outcomes and Measures: Quarterly rates of fatal and nonfatal firearm assault injuries and firearm self-harm injuries per 100 000 people. Results: Although New Jersey's pretrial detention population dramatically decreased under bail reform, the study did not find evidence of increases in overall firearm mortality (average treatment effect on the treated, -0.26 deaths per 100 000) or gun violence (average treatment effect on the treated, -0.24 deaths per 100 000), or within racialized groups during the postpolicy period. Conclusions and Relevance: Incarceration and gun violence are major public health problems impacting racially and economically marginalized groups. Cash bail reform may be an important tool for reducing pretrial detention and advancing health equity without exacerbating community violence.


Assuntos
Armas de Fogo , New Jersey/epidemiologia , Humanos , Armas de Fogo/legislação & jurisprudência , Armas de Fogo/estatística & dados numéricos , Armas de Fogo/economia , Masculino , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Feminino , Ferimentos por Arma de Fogo/economia , Ferimentos por Arma de Fogo/mortalidade , Ferimentos por Arma de Fogo/prevenção & controle , Ferimentos por Arma de Fogo/epidemiologia , Adulto , Violência/estatística & dados numéricos , Violência/economia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Homicídio/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto Jovem
9.
JAMA ; 331(20): 1732-1740, 2024 05 28.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38703403

RESUMO

Importance: Mortality rates in US youth have increased in recent years. An understanding of the role of racial and ethnic disparities in these increases is lacking. Objective: To compare all-cause and cause-specific mortality trends and rates among youth with Hispanic ethnicity and non-Hispanic American Indian or Alaska Native, Asian or Pacific Islander, Black, and White race. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study conducted temporal analysis (1999-2020) and comparison of aggregate mortality rates (2016-2020) for youth aged 1 to 19 years using US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Wide-Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research database. Data were analyzed from June 30, 2023, to January 17, 2024. Main Outcomes and Measures: Pooled, all-cause, and cause-specific mortality rates per 100 000 youth (hereinafter, per 100 000) for leading underlying causes of death were compared. Injuries were classified by mechanism and intent. Results: Between 1999 and 2020, there were 491 680 deaths among US youth, including 8894 (1.8%) American Indian or Alaska Native, 14 507 (3.0%) Asian or Pacific Islander, 110 154 (22.4%) Black, 89 251 (18.2%) Hispanic, and 267 452 (54.4%) White youth. Between 2016 and 2020, pooled all-cause mortality rates were 48.79 per 100 000 (95% CI, 46.58-51.00) in American Indian or Alaska Native youth, 15.25 per 100 000 (95% CI, 14.75-15.76) in Asian or Pacific Islander youth, 42.33 per 100 000 (95% CI, 41.81-42.86) in Black youth, 21.48 per 100 000 (95% CI, 21.19-21.77) in Hispanic youth, and 24.07 per 100 000 (95% CI, 23.86-24.28) in White youth. All-cause mortality ratios compared with White youth were 2.03 (95% CI, 1.93-2.12) among American Indian or Alaska Native youth, 0.63 (95% CI, 0.61-0.66) among Asian or Pacific Islander youth, 1.76 (95% CI, 1.73-1.79) among Black youth, and 0.89 (95% CI, 0.88-0.91) among Hispanic youth. From 2016 to 2020, the homicide rate in Black youth was 12.81 (95% CI, 12.52-13.10) per 100 000, which was 10.20 (95% CI, 9.75-10.66) times that of White youth. The suicide rate for American Indian or Alaska Native youth was 11.37 (95% CI, 10.30-12.43) per 100 000, which was 2.60 (95% CI, 2.35-2.86) times that of White youth. The firearm mortality rate for Black youth was 12.88 (95% CI, 12.59-13.17) per 100 000, which was 4.14 (95% CI, 4.00-4.28) times that of White youth. American Indian or Alaska Native youth had a firearm mortality rate of 6.67 (95% CI, 5.85-7.49) per 100 000, which was 2.14 (95% CI, 1.88- 2.43) times that of White youth. Black youth had an asthma mortality rate of 1.10 (95% CI, 1.01-1.18) per 100 000, which was 7.80 (95% CI, 6.78-8.99) times that of White youth. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, racial and ethnic disparities were observed for almost all leading causes of injury and disease that were associated with recent increases in youth mortality rates. Addressing the increasing disparities affecting American Indian or Alaska Native and Black youth will require efforts to prevent homicide and suicide, especially those events involving firearms.


Assuntos
Asma , Disparidades nos Níveis de Saúde , Mortalidade , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias , Suicídio , Ferimentos e Lesões , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Adulto Jovem , Causas de Morte/tendências , Estudos Transversais , Etnicidade/estatística & dados numéricos , Mortalidade/etnologia , Mortalidade/tendências , Suicídio/etnologia , Suicídio/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Ferimentos e Lesões/epidemiologia , Ferimentos e Lesões/etnologia , Ferimentos e Lesões/mortalidade , Grupos Raciais/etnologia , Grupos Raciais/estatística & dados numéricos , Indígena Americano ou Nativo do Alasca/estatística & dados numéricos , Brancos/estatística & dados numéricos , Negro ou Afro-Americano/estatística & dados numéricos , Hispânico ou Latino/estatística & dados numéricos , Nativo Asiático-Americano do Havaí e das Ilhas do Pacífico/estatística & dados numéricos , Asma/epidemiologia , Asma/etnologia , Asma/mortalidade , Homicídio/etnologia , Homicídio/estatística & dados numéricos , Armas de Fogo/estatística & dados numéricos , Ferimentos por Arma de Fogo/epidemiologia , Ferimentos por Arma de Fogo/etnologia , Ferimentos por Arma de Fogo/mortalidade , Acidentes de Trânsito/mortalidade , Acidentes de Trânsito/estatística & dados numéricos , Acidentes de Trânsito/tendências , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/epidemiologia , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/etnologia , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/mortalidade
10.
Front Public Health ; 12: 1352400, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38577291

RESUMO

Background: In the United States, 33% of households with children contain firearms, however only one-third reportedly store firearms securely. It's estimated that 31% of unintentional firearm injury deaths can be prevented with safety devices. Our objective was to distribute safe storage devices, provide safe storage education, evaluate receptivity, and assess impact of intervention at follow-up. Method: At five independent, community safety events, parents received a safe storage device after completing a survey that assessed firearms storage methods and parental comfort with discussions regarding firearm safety. Follow-up surveys collected 4 weeks later. Data were evaluated using descriptive analysis. Result: 320 participants completed the surveys, and 288 participants were gunowners living with children. Most participants were comfortable discussing safe storage with healthcare providers and were willing to talk with friends about firearm safety. 54% reported inquiring about firearm storage in homes their children visit, 39% stored all their firearms locked-up and unloaded, 32% stored firearms/ammunition separately. 121 (37%0.8) of participants completed the follow-up survey, 84% reported using the distributed safety device and 23% had purchased additional locks for other firearms. Conclusion: Participants were receptive to firearm safe storage education by a healthcare provider and distribution of a safe storage device. Our follow up survey results showed that pairing firearm safety education with device distribution increased overall use of safe storage devices which in turn has the potential to reduce the incidence of unintentional and intentional self-inflicted firearm injuries. Providing messaging to promote utilization of safe storage will impact a firearm safety culture change.


Assuntos
Armas de Fogo , Ferimentos por Arma de Fogo , Criança , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Ferimentos por Arma de Fogo/prevenção & controle , Ferimentos por Arma de Fogo/epidemiologia , Equipamentos de Proteção , Pais , Gestão da Segurança
11.
Front Public Health ; 12: 1339394, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38566791

RESUMO

Background: Firearm-related injuries (FRI) are an increasing cause of death and injury in children. The etiology for this rise is multifactorial and includes socioeconomic factors. Despite its prevalence and documented increase over COVID-19, there is a paucity of research on disparities and the influence of social determinants of health (SDH) in pediatric FRI. This study aims to explore the epidemiology of this vulnerable population in Atlanta, trends over time and relevant dates such as COVID-19 and a state firearm law, and disparities in clinical outcomes. Methods: Retrospective cohort of patients with FRI (0-20 years-old, x̄=9.8, Median = 11) presenting to our hospital EDs from January 2014 to April 2023 (N = 701) and eligible for the Trauma Registry. This period includes two major events, namely the COVID-19 pandemic (March 2020), and passage of state law Constitutional Carry Act (SB 319) (April 2022), allowing for permit-less concealed firearm carry. Single series interrupted time series (ITS) models were run and clinical outcome differences between race and insurance groups were calculated unadjusted and adjusted for confounders using inverse propensity treatment weights (IPTW). The primary outcome was mortality; secondary are admission and discharge. Results: Majority of FRI involved patients who were male (76.7%), Black (74.9%), publicly insured (82.6%), ≤12 years-old (61.8%), and injured by unintentional shootings (45.6%) or assault (43.7%). During COVID-19, there was a sustained increase in FRI rate by 0.42 patients per 1,000 trauma visits per month (95% CI 0.02-0.82, p = 0.042); post-SB 319 it was 2.3 patients per 1,000 trauma visits per month (95% CI 0.23-4.31, p = 0.029). Publicly insured patients had 58% lower odds of mortality than privately insured patients (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.18-0.99, p = 0.047). When controlled for race and mechanism of injury, among other confounding factors, this association was not significant (p = 0.652). Conclusion: Pediatric FRI are increasing over time, with disproportionate burdens on Black patients, at our hospitals. Disparities in mortality based on insurance necessitate further study. As social and economic repercussions of COVID-19 are still present, and state firearm law SB 319 is still in effect, assessment of ongoing trends is warranted to inform preventative strategies.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Armas de Fogo , Ferimentos por Arma de Fogo , Criança , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Recém-Nascido , Lactente , Pré-Escolar , Adolescente , Adulto Jovem , Adulto , Ferimentos por Arma de Fogo/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Pandemias , COVID-19/epidemiologia
12.
PLoS One ; 19(4): e0295348, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38687735

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The timeliness, accuracy, and completeness of data for firearm injury surveillance is crucial for public health surveillance efforts and informing injury prevention measures. While emergency department (ED) visit data can provide near real-time information on firearms injuries, there are concerns surrounding the accuracy of intent coding in these data. We examined whether emergency medical service (EMS) data provide more accurate firearm injury intent coding in comparison to ED data. METHODS: We applied a firearm injury definition to EMS encounter data in NC's statewide syndromic surveillance system (NC DETECT), from January 1, 2021, through December 31, 2022. We manually reviewed each record to determine intent, and the corresponding manual classifications were compared to the injury cause codes entered in the EMS data and to ED visit records where EMS-ED record linkage was possible. We then calculated the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values for each intent classification in SAS 9.4 using the manually reviewed intent classifications as the gold standard. RESULTS: We identified 9557 EMS encounters from January 1, 2021, through December 31, 2022 meeting our firearm injury definition. After removing false positives and duplicates, 8584 records were available for manual injury classification. Overall, our analysis demonstrated that manual and EMS injury cause code classifications were comparable. However, for the 3401 EMS encounters that could be linked to an ED visit record, sensitivity of the ED ICD-10-CM codes was low for assault and intentional self-harm encounters at 18.2% (CI 16.5-19.9%) and 22.2% (CI 16-28.5%), respectively. This demonstrates a marked difference in the reliability of the intent coding in the two data sources. CONCLUSIONS: This study illustrates both the value of examining EMS encounters for firearm injury intent, and the challenges of accurate intent coding in the ED setting. EMS coding has the potential for more accurate intent coding than ED coding within the context of existing hospital-based coding guidance. This may have implications for future firearm injury research, especially for nonfatal firearm injuries.


Assuntos
Serviços Médicos de Emergência , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Armas de Fogo , Classificação Internacional de Doenças , Ferimentos por Arma de Fogo , Humanos , Ferimentos por Arma de Fogo/epidemiologia , North Carolina , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adolescente , Visitas ao Pronto Socorro
14.
J Surg Res ; 298: 128-136, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38603943

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: There has been a sharp climb in the Unites States' death rate among opioid and other substance abuse patients, as well as an increased prevalence in gun violence. We aimed to investigate the association between substance abuse and gun violence in a national sample of patients presenting to US emergency departments (EDs). METHODS: We queried the 2018-2019 Nationwide Emergency Department Sample for patients ≥18 years with substance abuse disorders (opioid and other) using International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification codes. Within this sample, we analyzed characteristics and outcomes of patients with firearm-related injuries. The primary outcome was mortality; secondary outcomes were ED charges and length of stay. RESULTS: Among the 25.2 million substance use disorder (SUD) patients in our analysis, 35,306 (0.14%) had a firearm-related diagnosis. Compared to other SUD patients, firearm-SUD patients were younger (33.3 versus 44.7 years, P < 0.001), primarily male (88.6% versus 54.2%, P < 0.001), of lower-income status (0-25th percentile income: 56.4% versus 40.5%, P < 0.001), and more likely to be insured by Medicaid or self-pay (71.6% versus 53.2%, P < 0.001). Firearm-SUD patients had higher mortality (1.4% versus 0.4%, P < 0.001), longer lengths of stay (6.5 versus 4.9 days, P < 0.001), and higher ED charges ($9269 versus $5,164, P < 0.001). Firearm-SUD patients had a 60.3% rate of psychiatric diagnoses. Firearm-SUD patients had 5.5 times greater odds of mortality in adjusted analyses (adjusted odds ratio: 5.5, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Opioid-substance abuse patients with firearm injuries have higher mortality rates and costs among these groups, with limited discharge to postacute care resources. All these factors together point to the urgent need for improved screening and treatment for this vulnerable group of patients.


Assuntos
Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias , Ferimentos por Arma de Fogo , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Ferimentos por Arma de Fogo/mortalidade , Ferimentos por Arma de Fogo/epidemiologia , Ferimentos por Arma de Fogo/economia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/epidemiologia , Adulto Jovem , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Tempo de Internação/economia , Violência com Arma de Fogo/estatística & dados numéricos , Epidemia de Opioides/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/epidemiologia , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/mortalidade , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides/economia , Estudos Retrospectivos
15.
J Surg Res ; 298: 169-175, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38615550

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic created difficulties in access to care. There was also increased penetrating trauma in adults, which has been attributed to factors including increased firearm sales and social isolation. However, less is known about the relationship between the pandemic and pediatric trauma patients (PTPs). This study aimed to investigate the national incidence of penetrating trauma in PTPs, hypothesizing a higher rate with onset of the pandemic. We additionally hypothesized increased risk of complications and death in penetrating PTPs after the pandemic versus prepandemic. METHODS: We included all PTPs (aged ≤17-years-old) from the 2017-2020 Trauma Quality Improvement Program database, dividing the dataset into two eras: prepandemic (2017-2019) and pandemic (2020). We performed subset analyses of the pandemic and prepandemic penetrating PTPs. Bivariate analyses and a multivariable logistic regression analysis were performed. RESULTS: Of the 474,524 PTPs, 123,804 (26.1%) were from the pandemic year. The pandemic era had increased stab wounds (3.3% versus 2.8%, P > 0.001) and gunshot wounds (5.5% versus 4.0%, P < 0.001) compared to the prepandemic era. Among penetrating PTPs, the rates and associated risk of in-hospital complications (2.6% versus 2.8%, P = 0.23) (odds ratio 0.90, confidence interval 0.79-1.02, P = 0.11) and mortality (4.9% versus 5.0%, P = 0.58) (odds ratio 0.90, confidence interval 0.78-1.03, P = 0.12) were similar between time periods. CONCLUSIONS: This national analysis confirms increased penetrating trauma, particularly gunshot wounds in pediatric patients following onset of the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite this increase, there was no elevated risk of death or complications, suggesting that trauma systems adapted to the "dual pandemic" of COVID-19 and firearm violence in the pediatric population.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiologia , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Criança , Feminino , Masculino , Adolescente , Pré-Escolar , Ferimentos por Arma de Fogo/epidemiologia , Ferimentos por Arma de Fogo/mortalidade , Incidência , Estudos Retrospectivos , Ferimentos Penetrantes/epidemiologia , Ferimentos Penetrantes/mortalidade , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Pandemias , Lactente , Bases de Dados Factuais
16.
J Psychopathol Clin Sci ; 133(3): 273-284, 2024 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38512204

RESUMO

Despite the well-established link between firearm access and suicide, less is known about other variables that may influence the risk for death by self-inflicted gunshot versus other methods of suicide. As individual factors have demonstrated limited predictive ability, scholars have called for studies that consider the multifaceted relations between myriad variables. One alternative to the typical cause-and-effect approach for investigating various forms of psychopathology is network analysis. However, few studies have applied this method to suicidal outcomes, particularly in the context of a veteran population. Data from 19,234 male veteran suicide decedents (89.1% White; Mage = 57.16, SD = 18.64) acquired from the National Violent Death Reporting System were used to investigate characteristics of veteran suicide decedents who died by self-inflicted gunshot (gun; 66.4%) versus alternative methods (nongun, e.g., poisoning, hanging; 33.5%). Results of the overall moderated network model indicated that veterans in the gun group were more likely to have a physical health problem that contributed to the suicide than veterans in the nongun group. Additionally, results of the moderated network model revealed several pairs of associated circumstances whose relationships were significantly moderated by method of suicide, the three strongest of which included having a physical health problem that contributed to the suicide. Overall, results suggest that public health prevention and intervention efforts aimed at reducing the overall burden of physical health problems among male veterans may mitigate the risk of firearm suicides. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).


Assuntos
Armas de Fogo , Suicídio , Veteranos , Ferimentos por Arma de Fogo , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Ferimentos por Arma de Fogo/epidemiologia , Fatores de Risco
17.
Pediatrics ; 153(4)2024 Apr 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38433681

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Gun violence in the United States is a public health crisis. In 2019, gun injury became the leading cause of death among children aged birth to 19 years. Moreover, the United States has had 57 times as many school shootings as all other major industrialized nations combined. The purpose of this study was to understand the frequency of school-related gun violence across a quarter century, considering both school shootings and school mass shootings. METHODS: We drew on 2 publicly available datasets whose data allowed us to tabulate the frequency of school shootings and school mass shootings. The databases contain complementary data that provide a longitudinal, comprehensive view of school-related gun violence over the past quarter century. RESULTS: Across the 1997-1998 to 2021-2022 school years, there were 1453 school shootings. The most recent 5 school years reflected a substantially higher number of school shootings than the prior 20 years. In contrast, US school mass shootings have not increased, although school mass shootings have become more deadly. CONCLUSIONS: School shootings have risen in frequency in the recent 25 years and are now at their highest recorded levels. School mass shootings, although not necessarily increasing in frequency, have become more deadly. This leads to detrimental outcomes for all the nation's youth, not just those who experience school-related gun violence firsthand. School-based interventions can be used to address this public health crisis, and effective approaches such as Multi-Tiered Systems of Supports and services should be used in support of students' mental health and academic and behavioral needs.


Assuntos
Armas de Fogo , Violência com Arma de Fogo , Ferimentos por Arma de Fogo , Adolescente , Criança , Humanos , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Eventos de Tiroteio em Massa , Saúde Mental , Estudantes/psicologia , Ferimentos por Arma de Fogo/epidemiologia
20.
Am Surg ; 90(6): 1427-1433, 2024 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38520302

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The United States has one of the highest rates of gun violence and mass shootings. Timely medical attention in such events is critical. The objective of this study was to assess geographic disparities in mass shootings and access to trauma centers. METHODS: Data for all Level I and II trauma centers were extracted from the American College of Surgeons and the Trauma Center Association of America registries. Mass shooting event data (4+ individuals shot at a single event) were taken from the Gun Violence Archive between 2014 and 2018. RESULTS: A total of 564 trauma centers and 1672 mass shootings were included. Ratios of the number of mass shootings vs trauma centers per state ranged from 0 to 11.0 mass shootings per trauma center. States with the greatest disparity (highest ratio) included Louisiana and New Mexico. CONCLUSION: States in the southern regions of the US experience the greatest disparity due to a high burden of mass shootings with less access to trauma centers. Interventions are needed to increase access to trauma care and reduce mass shootings in these medically underserved areas.


Assuntos
Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde , Incidentes com Feridos em Massa , Centros de Traumatologia , Ferimentos por Arma de Fogo , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Centros de Traumatologia/estatística & dados numéricos , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Ferimentos por Arma de Fogo/epidemiologia , Ferimentos por Arma de Fogo/terapia , Incidentes com Feridos em Massa/estatística & dados numéricos , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Violência com Arma de Fogo/estatística & dados numéricos , Sistema de Registros , Eventos de Tiroteio em Massa
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...