Proportion and predictors of FVC decline in patients with interstitial lung disease.

RATIONALE: The proportion of patients who develop progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF), along with risk factors for progression remain poorly understood. OBJECTIVES: To examine factors associated with an increased risk of developing PPF among patients at a referral center. METHODS: We identified patients with a diagnosis of interstitial lung disease (ILD) seen within the Cleveland Clinic Health System. Utilizing a retrospective observational approach we estimated the risk of developing progression by diagnosis group and identified key clinical predictors using the FVC component of both the original progressive fibrotic interstitial lung disease (PFILD) and the proposed PPF (ATS) criteria. RESULTS: We identified 5934 patients with a diagnosis of ILD. The cumulative incidence of progression over the 24 months was similar when assessed with the PFILD and PPF criteria (33.1 % and 37.9 % respectively). Of those who met the ATS criteria, 9.5 % did not meet the PFILD criteria. Conversely, 4.3 % of patients who met PFILD thresholds did not achieve the 5 % absolute FVC decline criteria. Significant differences in the rate of progression were seen based on underlying diagnosis. Steroid therapy (HR 1.46, CI 1.31-1.62) was associated with an increased risk of progressive fibrosis by both PFILD and PPF criteria. CONCLUSION: Regardless of the definition used, the cumulative incidence of progressive disease is high in patients with ILD in the 24 months following diagnosis. Some differences are seen in the risk of progression when assessed by PFILD and PPF criteria. Further work is needed to identify modifiable risk factors for the development of progressive fibrosis.

Interstitial Lung Disease and Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis: a World Trade Center Cohort 20-Year Longitudinal Study.

PURPOSE: World Trade Center (WTC) exposure is associated with obstructive airway diseases and sarcoidosis. There is limited research regarding the incidence and progression of non-sarcoidosis interstitial lung diseases (ILD) after WTC-exposure. ILD encompasses parenchymal diseases which may lead to progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF). We used the Fire Department of the City of New York's (FDNY's) WTC Health Program cohort to estimate ILD incidence and progression. METHODS: This longitudinal study included 14,525 responders without ILD prior to 9/11/2001. ILD incidence and prevalence were estimated and standardized to the US 2014 population. Poisson regression modeled risk factors, including WTC-exposure and forced vital capacity (FVC), associated with ILD. Follow-up time ended at the earliest of incident diagnosis, end of study period/case ascertainment, transplant or death. RESULTS: ILD developed in 80/14,525 FDNY WTC responders. Age, smoking, and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) prior to diagnosis were associated with incident ILD, though FVC was not. PPF developed in 40/80 ILD cases. Among the 80 cases, the average follow-up time after ILD diagnosis was 8.5 years with the majority of deaths occurring among those with PPF (PPF: n = 13; ILD without PPF: n = 6). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of post-9/11 ILD was more than two-fold greater than the general population. An exposure-response gradient could not be demonstrated. Half the ILD cases developed PPF, higher than previously reported. Age, smoking, and GERD were risk factors for ILD and PPF, while lung function was not. This may indicate that lung function measured after respirable exposures would not identify those at risk for ILD or PPF.

A study on the prevalence and prognosis of progressive pulmonary fibrosis: A retrospective observational study.

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) encompasses a heterogeneous group of more than 200 diffuse parenchymal lung diseases with various clinical courses. Disease progression is one of the most important prognostic factors, and, the definition of progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF) has recently been established. This study aimed to estimate the prevalence, risk factors, and prognosis of PPF among patients with non-idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) in real-world practice. A total of 215 patients were retrospectively analyzed between January 2010 and June 2023 at the Haeundae Paik Hospital in the Republic of Korea. According to the criteria proposed in 2022 by Raghu et al, PPF defined as a condition that satisfies 2 or more of the following in the past year: worsening of respiratory symptoms, physiological evidence of disease progression, and radiological evidence of disease progression. The median age of the subjects was 67 years and 63.7% were female. A total of 40% was diagnosed with PPF and connective tissue disease-associated ILD (52.3%) was the most common type, followed by nonspecific interstitial pneumonitis (NSIP) (25.6%) and cryptogenic organizing pneumonitis (16.3%). In multivariate logistic regression for predicting PPF, both the use of steroids and immunosuppressants (OR: 2.57, 95% CI: 1.41-4.67, P = .002) and home oxygen use (OR: 25.17, 95% CI: 3.21-197.24, P = .002) were independent risk factors. During the follow-up period, the mortality rate was significantly higher in the PPF group than in the non-PPF group (24.4% vs 2.3%, P < .001). In the survival analysis using the Cox proportional hazard regression model, disease progression, older age and lower forced vital capacity (FVC) were independent risk factors for mortality. Our study demonstrated that the prevalence of PPF was 40%. Concomitant therapy of steroids with an immunosuppressants and home oxygen use are risk factors for PPF. PPF itself was significantly associated with high mortality rates. Risk factors for mortality were disease progression, older age, and lower FVC.

Progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF): Estimation of incidence and treatment rates in Japan using a claims database.

BACKGROUND: Interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) are a heterogeneous group of disorders, a subset of which develop progressive pulmonary fibrosis (PPF). There is little information on the epidemiology and treatment of PPFs in Japan. This retrospective cohort study estimated the incidence probability of progression to PPFs in patients with fibrosing ILDs other than idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis in a real-world Japanese setting. Management procedures and treatment patterns were also quantified. METHODS: Data were extracted from the Medical Data Vision database from 01-Jan-2012 to 28-May-2020, comprising a 6.91-year patient identification period, 1-year pre-index period, and post-index period. The primary outcome was the cumulative incidence probability of progression to PPF up to 24 months. Subgroup analyses were performed by the presence/absence of connective tissue disease-ILD and by pre-specified ILD clinical diagnosis. RESULTS: Of the 34,960 eligible patients (mean age: 71.1 years, males: 52.5%), 14,580 (41.7%) progressed to PPF. The 24-month incidence probability of progression to PPF was 39.5%. A relatively comparable percentage of patients progressed across all ILD subtypes. Oral corticosteroids and tacrolimus were the most common therapies during the pre- and post-index periods. Treatment rates were very low in the post-index period. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first claims database study to estimate the incidence probability of progression to PPF in Japan. Progression appeared common in patients with chronic fibrosing ILDs, with comparable percentages of patients across all subtypes developing PPF at 2 years. Future studies should assess the impact of regular monitoring and early intervention on treating fibrotic ILDs and preventing progression.

Organ involvement in newly diagnosed sarcoidosis patients in the Netherlands: The first large European multicentre prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Clinical presentation and prevalence of organ involvement is highly variable in sarcoidosis and depends on ethnic, genetic and geographical factors. These data are not extensively studied in a Dutch population. AIM: To determine the prevalence of organ involvement and the indication for systemic immunosuppressive therapy in newly diagnosed sarcoidosis patients in the Netherlands. METHODS: Two large Dutch teaching hospitals participated in this prospective cohort study. All adult patients with newly diagnosed sarcoidosis were prospectively included and a standardized work-up was performed. Organ involvement was defined using the WASOG instrument. RESULTS: Between 2015 and 2020, a total of 330 patients were included, 55% were male, mean age was 46 (SD 14) years. Most of them were white (76%). Pulmonary involvement including thoracic lymph node enlargement was present in 316 patients (96%). Pulmonary parenchymal disease was present in 156 patients (47%). Ten patients (3%) had radiological signs of pulmonary fibrosis. Cutaneous sarcoidosis was present in 74 patients (23%). Routine ophthalmological screening revealed uveitis in 29 patients (12%, n = 256)). Cardiac and neurosarcoidosis were diagnosed in respectively five (2%) and six patients (2%). Renal involvement was observed in 11 (3%) patients. Hypercalcaemia and hypercalciuria were observed in 29 (10%) and 48 (26%, n = 182) patients, respectively. Hepatic involvement was found in 6 patients (2%). In 30% of the patients, systemic immunosuppressive treatment was started at diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: High-risk organ involvement in sarcoidosis is uncommon at diagnosis. Indication for systemic immunosuppressive therapy was present in a minority of patients.

Rising cases of drug-induced pulmonary fibrosis: Analysis of the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database, 2000-2022.

PURPOSE: Pulmonary fibrosis (PF) is a severe, progressive disease, which may be caused by exposure to certain medications. METHODS: We queried the U.S. FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) from 2000 to 2022, using the search terms "pulmonary fibrosis" and "idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis" and excluded reports with patients under the age of 18 years, and patients with unknown sex or age. Reports were sorted by generic drug names, counted, and plotted over time using a best-fit trendline based on an exponential function. RESULTS: From 2000 to 2022, there were 24 095 935 adverse drug events reported in FAERS, of which 17 520 (0.07%) were reported as PF. After excluding reports containing patients with unknown age (5255, 30%), sex (122, 0.7%), and age below 18 years old (155, 0.9%), our study included 11 988 reports. The mean age of the study sample was 66.5 ± 13.1 years, and 6248 patients (52.1%) were male. Plotting the 11 988 reports by year revealed an exponential best fit line (R2 = 0.88) with a positive slope over time. The top five drug classes associated with PF were disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs, 39.4%), antineoplastic agents (26.4%), cardiovascular agents (12.6%), corticosteroids (4.6%), and immunosuppressive agents (4.0%). CONCLUSION: A 23-year analysis of the FAERS database revealed exponentially increasing adverse event reports of PF. Significant annual increases in reporting of PF suspected with DMARDs and antineoplastic agents were identified. Our study highlights important trends, which should be used to guide PF research related to drugs of potential importance.

Prevalence of Burn Pit Associated Symptoms Among US Veterans Who Utilize Non-Veteran's Affairs Private Healthcare.

OBJECTIVE: Do the 3.5 million US veterans, who primarily utilize private healthcare, have similar burn pit exposure and disease compared to the VA Burn Pit registry? METHODS: This is an online volunteer survey of Gulf War and Post-9/11 veterans. RESULTS: Burn pit exposure had significantly higher odds of extremity numbness, aching pain and burning, asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, interstitial lung disease, constrictive bronchiolitis, pleuritis, and pulmonary fibrosis. Chi-square did not reveal a difference in burn pit exposure and cancer diagnoses. CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate increased risk of neurological symptoms associated with burn pit exposure, which are not covered in the 2022 federal Promise to Address Comprehensive Toxics Act. Additional data will allow for the continued review and consideration for future medical benefits.

Lung cancer risk and occupational pulmonary fibrosis: systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Molecular pathways found to be important in pulmonary fibrosis are also involved in cancer pathogenesis, suggesting common pathways in the development of pulmonary fibrosis and lung cancer. RESEARCH QUESTION: Is pulmonary fibrosis from exposure to occupational carcinogens an independent risk factor for lung cancer? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane databases with over 100 search terms regarding occupational hazards causing pulmonary fibrosis was conducted. After screening and extraction, quality of evidence and eligibility criteria for meta-analysis were assessed. Meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model. RESULTS: 52 studies were identified for systematic review. Meta-analysis of subgroups identified silicosis as a risk factor for lung cancer when investigating odds ratios for silicosis in autopsy studies (OR 1.47, 95% CI 1.13-1.90) and for lung cancer mortality in patients with silicosis (OR 3.21, 95% CI 2.67-3.87). Only considering studies with an adjustment for smoking as a confounder identified a significant increase in lung cancer risk (OR 1.58, 95% CI 1.34-1.87). However, due to a lack of studies including cumulative exposure, no adjustments could be included. In a qualitative review, no definitive conclusion could be reached for asbestosis and silicosis as independent risk factors for lung cancer, partly because the studies did not take cumulative exposure into account. INTERPRETATION: This systematic review confirms the current knowledge regarding asbestosis and silicosis, indicating a higher risk of lung cancer in exposed individuals compared to exposed workers without fibrosis. These individuals should be monitored for lung cancer, especially when asbestosis or silicosis is present.

Impact of combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema on lung cancer risk and mortality in rheumatoid arthritis: A multicenter retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: Combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema (CPFE) is a syndrome characterized by the coexistence of emphysema and fibrotic interstitial lung disease (ILD). The aim of this study was to examine the effect of CPFE on lung cancer risk and lung cancer-related mortality in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study of patients newly diagnosed with lung cancer at five community hospitals between June 2006 and December 2021. Patients were followed until lung cancer-related death, other-cause death, loss to follow-up, or the end of the study. We used the cumulative incidence function with Gray's test and Fine-Gray regression analysis for survival analysis. RESULTS: A total of 563 patients with biopsy-proven lung cancer were included (82 RA patients and 481 non-RA patients). The prevalence of CPFE was higher in RA patients than in non-RA patients (40.2% vs.10.0%) at lung cancer diagnosis. During follow-up, the crude incidence rate of lung cancer-related death was 0.29 and 0.10 per patient-year (PY) in RA and non-RA patients, and 0.32 and 0.07 per PY in patients with CPFE and patients without ILD or emphysema, respectively. The estimated death probability at 5 years differed between RA and non-RA patients (66% vs. 32%, p<0.001) and between patients with CPFE and patients without ILD or emphysema (71% vs. 24%, p<0.001). In addition to clinical cancer stage and no surgery within 1 month, RA and CPFE were identified as independent predictive factors for increased lung cancer-related mortality (RA: adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 2.49; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.65-4.76; CPFE: adjusted HR 2.01; 95% CI 1.24-3.23). CONCLUSIONS: RA patients with lung cancer had a higher prevalence of CPFE and increased cancer-related mortality compared with non-RA patients. Close monitoring and optimal treatment strategies tailored to RA patients with CPFE are important to improve the poor prognosis of lung cancer.

Radiological pulmonary sequelae after COVID-19 and correlation with clinical and functional pulmonary evaluation: results of a prospective cohort.

OBJECTIVES: Whether COVID-19 leads to long-term pulmonary sequelae or not remains unknown. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of persisting radiological pulmonary fibrotic lesions in patients hospitalized for COVID-19. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a prospective single-center study among patients hospitalized for COVID-19 between March and May 2020. Patients with residual symptoms or admitted into intensive care units were investigated 4 months after discharge by a chest CT (CCT) and pulmonary function tests (PFTs). The primary endpoint was the rate of persistent radiological fibrotic lesions after 4 months. Secondary endpoints included further CCT evaluation at 9 and 16 months, correlation of fibrotic lesions with clinical and PFT evaluation, and assessment of predictive factors. RESULTS: Among the 1151 patients hospitalized for COVID-19, 169 patients performed a CCT at 4 months. CCTs showed pulmonary fibrotic lesions in 19% of the patients (32/169). These lesions were persistent at 9 months and 16 months in 97% (29/30) and 95% of patients (18/19) respectively. There was no significant clinical difference based on dyspnea scale in patients with pulmonary fibrosis. However, PFT evaluation showed significantly decreased diffusing lung capacity for carbon monoxide (p < 0.001) and total lung capacity (p < 0.001) in patients with radiological lesions. In multivariate analysis, the predictive factors of radiological pulmonary fibrotic lesions were pulmonary embolism (OR = 9.0), high-flow oxygen (OR = 6.37), and mechanical ventilation (OR = 3.49). CONCLUSION: At 4 months, 19% of patients investigated after hospitalization for COVID-19 had radiological pulmonary fibrotic lesions; they persisted up to 16 months. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT: Whether COVID-19 leads to long-term pulmonary sequelae or not remains unknown. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of persisting radiological pulmonary fibrotic lesions in patients hospitalized for COVID-19. The prevalence of persisting lesions after COVID-19 remains unclear. We assessed this prevalence and predictive factors leading to fibrotic lesions in a large cohort. The respiratory clinical impact of these lesions was also assessed. KEY POINTS: • Nineteen percent of patients hospitalized for COVID-19 had radiological fibrotic lesions at 4 months, remaining stable at 16 months. • COVID-19 fibrotic lesions did not match any infiltrative lung disease pattern. • COVID-19 fibrotic lesions were associated with pulmonary function test abnormalities but did not lead to clinical respiratory manifestation.

Riesgo cardiovascular en pacientes con esclerosis sistémica / Cardiovascular Risk in Patients with Systemic Sclerosis

Introducción: El riesgo cardiovascular es importante en la evaluación de los pacientes con esclerosis sistémica. Objetivo: Determinar el riesgo cardiovascular en pacientes con esclerosis sistémica. Métodos: Se realizó un estudio transversal y descriptivo en pacientes protocolizados del Servicio de Reumatología, en el período de enero 2020 a enero 2022. Se recogieron variables demográficas, clínicas, y se aplicó la calculadora de riesgo cardiovascular Framingham. Resultados: Se incluyeron 105 pacientes con edad media de 48,6 ± 15,3 años, el grupo más frecuente de 50 a 59 años (36,2 por ciento), predominó el sexo femenino 92,2 por ciento el color de piel blanca (74,3 por ciento), el tiempo de evolución fue mayor a 5 años (66,7 por ciento) con una media de 10,5 ± 9,3. El valor promedio de la escala de gravedad modificada de Medsger fue 5,1 ± 2,7 y el 72,4 por ciento con afectación leve. El fenómeno de Raynaud y la fibrosis pulmonar fueron más frecuentes con un 89,5 por ciento y 55,2 por ciento. El índice de Rodnan en promedio fue de 13,1 ± 8,0 y los reactantes de fase aguda normales en la mayoría. Los factores de riesgo cardiovascular más frecuentes fueron la HTA (30,2 por ciento) y dislipidemia (19,9 por ciento). El índice de masa corporal que predominó fue de peso adecuado (54,3 por ciento). Predominó el riesgo cardiovascular bajo según score de Framingham (86 por ciento). Existieron diferencias significativas entre las medias del tiempo de evolución y el riesgo cardiovascular (10 ± 6,9 frente a 9,6 ± 8,8 frente a 16,9 ± 10,8; p = 0,032). Conclusiones: El riesgo cardiovascular en los pacientes con esclerosis sistémica fue bajo(AU)

Introduction: Cardiovascular risk is important in the evaluation of patients with systemic sclerosis. Objective: To determine the cardiovascular risk in patients with systemic sclerosis. Methods: A cross-sectional and descriptive study was carried out in protocolized patients of Rheumatology Service, from January 2020 to January 2022. Demographic and clinical variables were collected, and Framingham cardiovascular risk calculator was used. Results: One hundred five patients were included with a mean age of 48.6 ± 15.3 years, the most frequent group was 50 to 59 years (36.2percent), female sex (92.2percent) predominated, as well as white skin color (74.3percent). The evolution time was greater than 5 years (66.7percent) with a mean of 10.5 ± 9.3. The average value of modified Medsger severity scale was 5.1 ± 2.7 and 72.4percent had mild involvement. Raynaud's phenomenon and pulmonary fibrosis were more common at 89.5percent and 55.2percent. Rodnan index on average was 13.1 ± 8.0 and the acute phase reactants were normal in the majority. The most frequent cardiovascular risk factors were HBP (30.2percent) and dyslipidemia (19.9percent). The predominant body mass index was adequate weight (54.3percent). Low cardiovascular risk according to Framingham score prevailed (86percent). There were significant differences between the mean duration of evolution and cardiovascular risk (10 ± 6.9 vs. 9.6 ± 8.8 vs. 16.9 ± 10.8; p = 0.032). Conclusions: The cardiovascular risk in patients with systemic sclerosis was low(AU)

High prevalence of upper lung field pulmonary fibrosis radiologically consistent with pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis in patients with round atelectasis.

BACKGROUND: Upper-lung field pulmonary fibrosis (upper-PF), radiologically consistent with pleuroparenchymal fibroelastosis (PPFE), was reported to develop in patients with a history of asbestos exposure and tuberculous pleurisy, indicating that chronic pleuritis is correlated with upper-PF development. Round atelectasis reportedly emerges after chronic pleuritis. This study aimed to clarify the association between round atelectasis and upper-PF. METHODS: We examined the radiological reports of all consecutive patients with round atelectasis between 2006 and 2018 and investigated the incidence of upper-PF development. RESULTS: Among 85 patients with round atelectasis, 21 patients (24.7%) were confirmed to finally develop upper-PF lesions. Upper-PF was diagnosed after round atelectasis recognition in more than half of the patients (13/21, 61.9%), whereas upper-PF and round atelectasis were simultaneously detected in the remaining 8 patients. At the time of round atelectasis detection, almost all patients (19/21, 90.5%) had diffuse pleural thickening and round atelectasis was commonly observed in non-upper lobes of 19 patients (90.5%). Fourteen patients had round atelectasis in unilateral lung, and the remaining 7 patients had round atelectasis in bilateral lungs. Among all 14 patients with unilateral round atelectasis, upper-PF developed on the same (n = 11) or both sides (n = 3). Thus, upper-PF emerged on the same side where round atelectasis was present (14/14, 100%). The autopsy of one patient revealed a thickened parietal-visceral pleura suggestive of chronic pleuritis. Subpleural fibroelastosis was also observed. CONCLUSIONS: Upper-PF occasionally develops on the same side of round atelectasis. Upper-PF may develop as a sequela of chronic pleuritis.

Prevalence and risk factors of COVID-19 infection, mortality, and post-infection lung fibrosis in patients with type 2 diabetes: a cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVES: The clinical course of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection is often aggressive, with unfavorable outcomes for those with comorbidities such as type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). We aimed to assess the prevalence and risk factors of COVID-19 infection, mortality, and post-infection lung fibrosis in patients with COVID-19 infection who had T2DM. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, we included adult patients with T2DM who attended an endocrinology clinic and underwent testing for COVID-19 infection. RESULTS: Among 1039 included patients, the mean age was 59.5 ± 11.0 years and 429 (41.3%) were men. Overall, 87.1% of patients had received COVID-19 vaccination and 32.3% had confirmed COVID-19 infection. The COVID-19-related mortality was 3.0% and rate of post-COVID-19 lung fibrosis was 19.1%. Vaccination was associated with lower COVID-19-related mortality (odds ratio [OR]: 0.03, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.0-0.3) and post-COVID-19 lung fibrosis risk (OR: 0.3, 95% CI: 0.1-0.9). CONCLUSION: Patients with T2DM exhibited a high prevalence of COVID-19 infection and associated mortality. However, COVID-19 vaccines were beneficial in reducing the risks of COVID-19-related mortality and post-infection lung fibrosis in these patients. COVID-19 vaccines and boosters are recommended for patients with T2DM. Further studies involving larger study populations are necessary to validate these findings.

Comorbidity of Pulmonary Fibrosis and COPD/Emphysema: Research Status, Trends, and Future Directions --------- A Bibliometric Analysis from 2004 to 2023.

Objective: The comorbidity of pulmonary fibrosis and COPD/emphysema has garnered increasing attention. However, no bibliometric analysis of this comorbidity has been conducted thus far. This study aims to perform a bibliometric analysis to explore the current status and cutting-edge trends in the field, and to establish new directions for future research. Methods: Statistical computing, graphics, and data visualization tools such as VOSviewer, CiteSpace, Biblimatrix, and WPS Office were employed. Results: We identified a total of 1827 original articles and reviews on the comorbidity of pulmonary fibrosis and COPD/emphysema published between 2004 and 2023. There was an observed increasing trend in publications related to this comorbidity. The United States, Japan, and the United Kingdom were the countries with the highest contributions. Professor Athol Wells and the University of Groningen had the highest h-index and the most articles, respectively. Through cluster analysis of co-cited documents, we identified the top 17 major clusters. Keyword analysis predicted that NF-κB, oxidative stress, physical activity, and air pollution might be hot spots in this field in the future. Conclusion: This bibliometric analysis demonstrates a continuous increasing trend in literature related to the comorbidity of pulmonary fibrosis and COPD/emphysema. The research hotspots and trends identified in this study provide a reference for in-depth research in this field, aiming to promote the development of the comorbidity of pulmonary fibrosis and COPD/emphysema.

An increased risk of pulmonary hypertension in patients with combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema: a meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a common complication of combined pulmonary fibrosis and emphysema (CPFE). Whether the incidence of PH is increased in CPFE compared with pure pulmonary fibrosis or emphysema remains unclear. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the risk of PH in patients with CPFE compared to those with IPF or COPD/emphysema. METHODS: We searched the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and CNKI databases for relevant studies focusing on the incidence of PH in patients with CPFE and IPF or emphysema. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and standard mean differences (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were used to evaluate the differences in the clinical characteristics presence and severity of PH between patients with CPFE, IPF, or emphysema. The survival impact of PH in patients with CPFE was assessed using hazard ratios (HRs). RESULTS: A total of 13 eligible studies were included in the meta-analysis, involving 560, 720, and 316 patients with CPFE, IPF, and emphysema, respectively. Patients with CPFE had an increased PH risk with a higher frequency of pulmonary hypertension and higher estimated systolic pulmonary artery pressure (esPAP), compared with those with IPF (OR: 2.66; 95% CI: 1.55-4.57; P < 0.01; SMD: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.52-1.19; P < 0.01) or emphysema (OR: 3.19; 95% CI: 1.42-7.14; P < 0.01; SMD: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.50-0.96; P < 0.01). In addition, the patients with CPFE combined with PH had a poor prognosis than patients with CPFE without PH (HR: 6.16; 95% CI: 2.53-15.03; P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis showed that patients with CPFE were associated with a significantly higher risk of PH compared with those with IPF or emphysema alone. The presence of PH was a poor predictor of mortality.

Blood lead (Pb) is associated with lung fibrotic changes in non-smokers living in the vicinity of petrochemical complex: a population-based study.

Lead (Pb) is a toxic metal that has been extensively used in various industrial processes, and it persists in the environment, posing a continuous risk of exposure to humans. This study investigated blood lead levels in participants aged 20 years and older, who resided in Dalinpu for more than two years between 2016 to 2018, at Kaohsiung Municipal Siaogang Hospital. Graphite furnace atomic absorption spectrometry was used to analyze the blood samples for lead levels, and the LDCT (Low-Dose computed tomography) scans were interpreted by experienced radiologists. The blood lead levels were divided into quartiles, with Q1 representing levels of ≤1.10 µg/dL, Q2 representing levels of >1.11 and ≤1.60 µg/dL, Q3 representing levels of >1.61 and ≤2.30 µg/dL, and Q4 representing levels of >2.31 µg/dL. Individuals with lung fibrotic changes had significantly higher (mean ± SD) blood lead levels (1.88±1.27vs. 1.72±1.53 µg/dl, p< 0.001) than those with non-lung fibrotic changes. In multivariate analysis, we found that the highest quartile (Q4: >2.31 µg/dL) lead levels (OR: 1.36, 95% CI: 1.01-1.82; p= 0.043) and the higher quartile (Q3: >1.61 and ≤2.30 µg/dL) (OR: 1.33, 95% CI: 1.01-1.75; p= 0.041) was significantly associated with lung fibrotic changes compared with the lowest quartile (Q1: ≤1.10 µg/dL) (Cox and Snell R2, 6.1 %; Nagelkerke R2, 8.5 %). The dose-response trend was significant (Ptrend= 0.030). Blood lead exposure was significantly associated lung fibrotic change. To prevent lung toxicity, it is recommended to maintain blood lead levels lower than the current reference value.

Comparison of two antifibrotic treatments for lung fibrosis in post-COVID-19 syndrome: A randomized, prospective study.

BACKGROUND: Although pulmonary fibrosis secondary to COVID-19 infection is uncommon, it can lead to problems if not treated effectively in the early period. This study aimed to compare the effects of treatment with nintedanib and pirfenidone in patients with COVID-19-related fibrosis. METHODS: Thirty patients who presented to the post-COVID outpatient clinic between May 2021 and April 2022 with a history of COVID-19 pneumonia and exhibited persistent cough, dyspnea, exertional dyspnea, and low oxygen saturation at least 12 weeks after diagnosis were included. The patients were randomized to receive off-label treatment with nintedanib or pirfenidone and were followed up for 12 weeks. RESULTS: After 12 weeks of treatment, all pulmonary function test (PFT) parameters, 6MWT distance, and oxygen saturation were increased compared to baseline in both the pirfenidone group and nintedanib groups, while heart rate and radiological score levels were decreased (p<0.05 for all). The changes in 6MWT distance and oxygen saturation were significantly greater in the nintedanib group than in the pirfenidone group (p=0.02 and 0.005, respectively). Adverse drug effects were more frequent with nintedanib than pirfenidone, with the most common being diarrhea, nausea, and vomiting. CONCLUSION: In patients with interstitial fibrosis after COVID-19 pneumonia, both nintedanib and pirfenidone were observed to be effective in improving radiological score and PFT parameters. Nintedanib was more effective than pirfenidone in increasing exercise capacity and saturation values but caused more adverse drug effects.