RESUMO
PURPOSE: This study aimed to determine the incidence of peripheral intravenous catheter (PIVC)-induced phlebitis and its predictors among adult patients hospitalized at Dow University Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan. METHODS: A sample of 258 adult patients admitted in the selected wards and planned for peripheral intravenous catheter insertion were recruited through consecutive sampling during March to May 2019. Daily follow-ups were performed to observe signs of phlebitis using a validated tool. The cohort was followed until discharge, removal of peripheral intravenous catheter, or study conclusion. RESULTS: Of 258 patients studied, 139 (53.9%) were females. A significant number of the participants 104 (40.3%) were young adults of age 20-40 years. The incidence of phlebitis was 39.1%. Tuberculosis (TB), peripheral intravenous catheter dwell time before initial assessment, administration of IV fluids, and dissatisfactory nursing care at Day 1 were associated significantly with the development of phlebitis. There was a doseresponse relationship between the catheter dwell time in hours before initial assessment and the development of phlebitis. CONCLUSION: This study found an increased incidence (39.1%) in three months of PIVC-induced phlebitis among adult patients. In addition to patient-related and PIVC-related risk factors considered in this study, PIVC-induced phlebitis is found to be significantly associated with the level of PIVC care provided by nurses. Continuous nursing education, developing standard care plans for PIVCs, and proper documentation of care are recommended.
Assuntos
Cateterismo Periférico , Flebite , Centros de Atenção Terciária , Humanos , Flebite/epidemiologia , Flebite/etiologia , Feminino , Adulto , Masculino , Cateterismo Periférico/efeitos adversos , Paquistão/epidemiologia , Incidência , Estudos de Coortes , Fatores de Risco , Adulto Jovem , Pessoa de Meia-IdadeRESUMO
Peripheral intravenous catheters (PIVCs) are the most commonly used invasive devices in acute care hospitals, with nurses being primarily responsible for the insertion and care of these devices. This point prevalence study aimed to describe current PIVC status and nursing documentation in a large, regional health care system and to explore variables associated with PIVC complications. The study was conducted with adult inpatients. There were 665 PIVCs included in the study. Dressings were clean, dry, and intact in 83% of observations; only 2.7% did not have a transparent dressing. Thirty-one percent of PIVCs were inserted in areas of flexion. Median dwell time was 2.39 days (± 2.36 days), with upper arm sites having the longest dwell time. Overall inter-rater reliability (IRR) for an infiltration or phlebitis score of 0 was high (97.4% and 92%, respectively). However, overall agreement was only 77.16% for infiltration and 40.07% for phlebitis, with significant disagreement as scores increased. Study findings support that there was strong compliance with the Infusion Nurses Society's (INS) Infusion Therapy Standards of Practice vascular access practice recommendations; however, opportunities to improve infiltration/phlebitis assessment and documentation exist.
Assuntos
Cateterismo Periférico , Documentação , Flebite , Humanos , Cateterismo Periférico/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Masculino , Flebite/etiologia , Flebite/epidemiologia , Prevalência , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto , Idoso , Reprodutibilidade dos TestesRESUMO
This study aims to analyze the incidences of peripheral intravenous catheter-related phlebitis and infiltration and the associated risk factors in emergency departments. This descriptive cross-sectional, nonexperimental study was conducted with 300 participants in the emergency department of a university hospital in Türkiye between January 15 and February 15, 2018. The incidence of peripheral intravenous catheter-related phlebitis was 31%, which was grade 1 in 29.7% and grade 2 in 1.3% of the emergency department participants. Additionally, the incidence of peripheral intravenous catheter-related infiltration was 55.4%, including grades 1, 2, and 3 in 36.0%, 12.7%, and 6.7% of the participants, respectively. Incidences of phlebitis and infiltration were related to age, duration of peripheral intravenous catheterization longer than 24 hours, and repeated use of the catheter insertion site. The findings of this study may draw attention to the factors that trigger phlebitis and infiltration due to peripheral intravenous catheter insertions in the emergency department and may guide practices to prevent these complications before they develop. In this context, the Phlebitis Scale and Infiltration Scale developed by the Infusion Nurses Society are recommended to be used in the emergency department.
Assuntos
Cateterismo Periférico , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Flebite , Humanos , Flebite/etiologia , Flebite/epidemiologia , Estudos Transversais , Cateterismo Periférico/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Adulto , Fatores de Risco , Incidência , Idoso , Turquia , Hospitais UniversitáriosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Peripheral intravenous catheters (PIVCs) contribute substantially to the global burden of infections. This systematic review assessed 24 infection prevention and control (IPC) interventions to prevent PIVC-associated infections and other complications. METHODS: We searched Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, WHO Global Index Medicus, CINAHL, and reference lists for controlled studies from 1 January 1980-16 March 2023. We dually selected studies, assessed risk of bias, extracted data, and rated the certainty of evidence (COE). For outcomes with 3 or more trials, we conducted Bayesian random-effects meta-analyses. RESULTS: 105 studies met our prespecified eligibility criteria, addressing 16 of the 24 research questions; no studies were identified for 8 research questions. Based on findings of low to high COE, wearing gloves reduced the risk of overall adverse events related to insertion compared with no gloves (1 non-randomized controlled trial [non-RCT]; adjusted risk ratio [RR], .52; 95% CI, .33-.85), and catheter removal based on defined schedules potentially resulted in a lower phlebitis/thrombophlebitis incidence (10 RCTs; RR, 0.74, 95% credible interval, .49-1.01) compared with clinically indicated removal in adults. In neonates, chlorhexidine reduced the phlebitis score compared with non-chlorhexidine-containing disinfection (1 RCT; 0.14 vs 0.68; P = .003). No statistically significant differences were found for other measures. CONCLUSIONS: Despite their frequent use and concern about PIVC-associated complications, this review underscores the urgent need for more high-quality studies on effective IPC methods regarding safe PIVC management. In the absence of valid evidence, adherence to standard precaution measures and documentation remain the most important principles to curb PIVC complications. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: The protocol was registered in the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/exdb4).
Assuntos
Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter , Cateterismo Periférico , Humanos , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/prevenção & controle , Cateterismo Periférico/efeitos adversos , Controle de Infecções/métodos , Flebite/prevenção & controle , Flebite/etiologia , Flebite/epidemiologia , Teorema de BayesRESUMO
BACKGROUND: It remains unclear whether peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs) are superior to central venous catheters (CVCs); therefore, we compared post-implantation complications between CVC and PICC groups. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Patients who received CVCs or PICCs between April 2010 and March 2018 were identified from the Diagnosis Procedure Combination database, a national inpatient database in Japan. The outcomes of interest included catheter infection, pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis, and phlebitis. Propensity score overlap weighting was used to balance patient backgrounds. Outcomes were compared using logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: We identified 164,185 eligible patients, including 161,605 (98.4%) and 2,580 (1.6%) in the CVC and PICC groups, respectively. The PICC group was more likely to have overall complications (odds ratio [OR], 1.70; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.32-2.19), pulmonary embolism (OR, 2.32; 95% CI, 1.38-3.89), deep vein thrombosis (OR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.16-2.99), and phlebitis (OR, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.27-2.32) than the CVC group. There was no significant intergroup difference in catheter infection (OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.39-3.04). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with PICCs had a significantly greater incidence of complications than did those with CVCs. Further research is necessary to explore the factors contributing to these complications.
Assuntos
Cateterismo Venoso Central , Cateterismo Periférico , Bases de Dados Factuais , Unidades de Terapia Intensiva , Pontuação de Propensão , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Idoso , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Cateterismo Periférico/efeitos adversos , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efeitos adversos , Cateteres Venosos Centrais/efeitos adversos , Flebite/etiologia , Flebite/epidemiologia , Japão/epidemiologia , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/epidemiologia , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/etiologia , Embolia Pulmonar/etiologia , Embolia Pulmonar/epidemiologia , Trombose Venosa/etiologia , Trombose Venosa/epidemiologia , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , AdultoRESUMO
The most commonly used vascular access is the peripheral intravenous catheter (PIVC). However, it can trigger complications and the occurrence of adverse events, such as phlebitis. This study evaluated the variables that are associated with the occurrence of phlebitis in medical and surgical inpatient units. This is an observational, retrospective, case-control study in medical and surgical hospitalization units of a private general hospital in the city of São Paulo. Participants were an average age of 66.3 years, and 71% were hospitalized in medical units. The risk variables associated with phlebitis were medical hospitalization (odds ratio [OR] = 4.36; P = .002), presence of comorbidity (OR = 10.73; P < .001), and having 5 or more PIVCs (OR = 53.79; P = .001). Regarding intravenous therapy, the use of contrast was a risk variable (OR = 2.23; P = .072). On the other hand, patient education regarding PIVCs was a protective measure against the development of phlebitis. The nursing team plays an essential role in the care of patients with PIVCs, inpatient guidance, planning, and device choice, taking into account the risk factors for phlebitis to maintain the preservation of vascular health and reduce adverse events.
Assuntos
Flebite , Humanos , Idoso , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Estudos Retrospectivos , Brasil , Flebite/epidemiologia , Flebite/etiologia , HospitaisRESUMO
PURPOSE: To determine the prevalence, clinical features, and radiographic findings of superior ophthalmic vein periphlebitis (SOVP) in thyroid eye disease (TED). METHODS: Patients with a clinical diagnosis of thyroid eye disease and contrast-enhanced imaging were included. Imaging was reviewed for the presence of SOVP, and patients with SOVP were compared to those without. A random eye was determined to be the affected eye in patients without SOVP. RESULTS: A total of 212 patients met the inclusion criteria. Unilateral SOVP was identified in 4.7% of cases. There was no significant difference in age ( p = 0.22), gender ( p = 0.09), or disease duration ( p = 0.14) between patients with and without SOVP. There was a significant ( p < 0.05) difference in stage classification and clinical activity core between the groups. The affected eye in patients with SOVP had significantly ( p < 0.05) greater margin reflex distance 1, degree of relative proptosis, horizontal motility restriction, and vertical motility restriction than in patients without SOVP. There was no significant difference in horizontal strabismus ( p = 1.0), vertical strabismus ( p = 0.87), or relative intraocular pressure ( p = 0.77). On imaging, the maximal diameter of the SR and IR were found to be significantly ( p < 0.05) larger in the affected eye of patients with periphlebitis; however, there was no difference in measured diameter of the medial rectus and ( p = 0.30) or lateral rectus ( p = 0.78). CONCLUSIONS: SOVP is an under-reported imaging finding of thyroid eye disease. It is associated with significantly greater margin reflex distance 1, relative proptosis, and motility restriction on exam as well as larger superior rectus and inferior rectus diameter on imaging. These patients tend to present in the active stage of disease with greater clinical activity score.
Assuntos
Oftalmopatia de Graves , Flebite , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Oftalmopatia de Graves/diagnóstico , Oftalmopatia de Graves/epidemiologia , Oftalmopatia de Graves/complicações , Prevalência , Adulto , Idoso , Flebite/diagnóstico , Flebite/epidemiologia , Flebite/etiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Veias/diagnóstico por imagem , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios XRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To identify risk factors associated with peripheral intravenous catheter (PIVC) complications in dogs hospitalized in the critical care unit (CCU). ANIMALS: 107 dogs admitted to the CCU between October 2022 and March 2023. METHODS: This prospective, observational clinical trial was performed at a single veterinary teaching hospital. Dogs hospitalized in the CCU for at least 24 hours were evaluated for enrollment. PIVC were placed following a standardized protocol and monitored for complications. PIVC complications were classified as extravasation, phlebitis, dislodgement, occlusion, line breakage, or patient removal. RESULTS: Median PIVC dwell time was 46.50 hours (range, 24.25 to 159.25 hours). Overall PIVC complication rate was 12.1% (13/107), with phlebitis (4/107 [3.7%]) and extravasation (4/107 [3.7%]) being the most frequently recorded complications. Multivariable analysis identified increasing length of hospitalization (LOH; OR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.04 to 1.97; P = .029), an acute patient physiologic and laboratory evaluation full (APPLEFULL) score > 35 (OR, 4.66; 95% CI, 1.09 to 19.90; P = .038), and having 2 PIVCs placed at admission (OR, 10.92; 95% CI, 1.96 to 60.73; P = .006) as risk factors for PIVC complication. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Increasing LOH, an APPLEFULL score > 35 and having 2 PIVCs placed at admission were associated with increased odds for PIVC complication in this study. Although these are independent risk factors for PIVC complication, the combination of increasing LOH, an APPLEFULL score > 35, and having 2 PIVCs placed at admission may represent a more severely ill population, drawing attention to a vulnerable group of dogs at risk for PIVC complication.
Assuntos
Cateterismo Periférico , Doenças do Cão , Flebite , Animais , Cães , Cateterismo Periférico/efeitos adversos , Cateterismo Periférico/veterinária , Cateterismo Periférico/métodos , Catéteres/efeitos adversos , Doenças do Cão/etiologia , Hospitalização , Hospitais Veterinários , Hospitais de Ensino , Flebite/epidemiologia , Flebite/etiologia , Flebite/veterinária , Estudos ProspectivosRESUMO
Peripheral venous catheterization (PVC) is the most commonly used invasive technique, and its importance to patient safety is increasing. And phlebitis is a common complication which can lead to increased costs and extended hospital stays. This study attempted to characterize the current status of phlebitis based on incident reports in the Korea Patient Safety Reporting & Learning System. This retrospective descriptive study analysed 259 phlebitis cases reported in that system from 1 July 2017 to 31 December 2019. The analysis results were summarized using numbers and percentages or means with standard deviations. Among the reported phlebitis cases, antibiotics and high-osmolarity fluids comprised 48.2% of the intravenous inflammatory drugs used. All reported cases presented blood-flow infections. Insufficient observation or management was the most common cause of phlebitis. It was found that interventions for phlebitis were inconsistent with those recommended in evidence-based guidelines. Recommendations for nurses to alleviate complications in PVC must be promoted and educated. It is necessary to provide feedback from the incident reports analysis.
Assuntos
Cateterismo Periférico , Flebite , Humanos , Cateterismo Periférico/efeitos adversos , Cateterismo Periférico/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Flebite/epidemiologia , Flebite/etiologia , Gestão de Riscos , Hospitais , República da Coreia/epidemiologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To establish the incidence and severity of chemotherapy-induced phlebitis (CIP) following administration of epirubicin chemotherapy using a volumetric infusion pump (Hospira Plum 360), compared to a previous study of manual injection of epirubicin. Also the study aimed to gain insight into staff perceptions of ease of use and safety of infusion pump administration. METHODS: An observational study of women with breast cancer (n = 47) receiving epirubicin via volumetric infusion pump. Phlebitis was reported through a participant self-assessment questionnaire and graded by clinical assessment three weeks after each chemotherapy cycle. Staff perceptions were explored using questionnaires. RESULTS: Infusion pump administration delivered a significantly higher concentration of epirubicin (p < 0.001), a significantly higher rate of grade 3 and 4 participant reported CIP between cycles (p = 0.003) but demonstrated no significant difference in grade 3 and 4 CIP when assessed clinically three weeks after treatment (p = 0.157). CONCLUSION: Peripheral epirubicin administration will result in severe CIP being experienced by a proportion of patients irrespective of whether infusion pump or manual injection method is used. Those at high risk of severe CIP should be informed of the risk and offered a central line. For those with a lower risk of severe phlebitis use of the infusion pump appears to be a safe option.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos , Neoplasias da Mama , Flebite , Humanos , Feminino , Epirubicina/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias da Mama/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias da Mama/complicações , Flebite/induzido quimicamente , Flebite/epidemiologia , Flebite/tratamento farmacológico , Bombas de Infusão/efeitos adversos , Antineoplásicos/efeitos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efeitos adversosRESUMO
Introduction: Midline catheters have been reported to be an effective and safe means of providing patients with intravenous access within the hospital and community setting. With minimal experience in the introduction of a midline service across the local health network, a regional hospital pursued this task. This observational study assesses the provision of a safe clinical framework for midline insertion, and the improvement of patient care and experiences by avoiding treatment interruptions and unnecessary cannulation attempts from failed traditional peripheral vascular access devices. Methods: From the introduction of the midline service in June 2018, outcome measures of all patients who received a midline over the following two-year period were documented including rate of line success, complication rates, dwell time, and the number of insertion attempts. Results: The midline service provided 207 lines over a two-year period with a total dwell time of 1,585 days. Project goals were achieved with 85% (Aim > 85%) of all lines completing treatment prior to removal. First attempt insertion was 86% (Aim > 80%) with a maximum insertion attempt of two. Rates of line-related complications were less than 8%, with five documented cases of phlebitis (2.5%) and one deep vein thrombosis with no infections documented. Conclusion: Despite limited resources, a successful midline service was introduced. Future expansion will see an increase in insertor numbers providing improved access to the service.
Assuntos
Cateterismo Venoso Central , Cateterismo Periférico , Flebite , Dispositivos de Acesso Vascular , Humanos , Cateterismo Periférico/efeitos adversos , Catéteres , Cateterismo Venoso Central/efeitos adversos , Flebite/epidemiologia , Flebite/etiologia , Flebite/prevenção & controleRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Phlebitis is a severe inflammatory response in patients undergoing chemotherapy that can lead to complications and increased length of hospitalization. OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to examine the effects of sesame oil and nitroglycerin ointment on the incidence of chemotherapy-induced phlebitis in patients with cancer. Methods: This clinical trial study involved 138 cancer patients who were randomly assigned into three groups. The three groups received nitroglycerin ointment, sesame oil, or betadine alcoholic solution that were applied on the distal catheter area at a length of 1.5 centimeters and width of 2 × 4 cm using graded paper. The site was then dressed and fixed with anti-allergenic adhesives. The research samples were examined for 72 hours for the incidence of phlebitis. RESULTS: No statistically significant difference was observed between the incidence of phlebitis in the sesame oil, nitroglycerin ointment and alcohol-betadine groups in the first 24 hours (p=0.2), the second 24 hours (p=0.13) and the third 24 hours (p=0.13). CONCLUSION: External use of both sesame oil and nitroglycerin is effective in reducing chemotherapy-induced phlebitis. Due to its anti-inflammatory effect and low cost, however, using sesame oil is recommended.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos , Flebite , Humanos , Nitroglicerina/efeitos adversos , Óleo de Gergelim , Incidência , Pomadas , Povidona-Iodo , Método Simples-Cego , Administração Tópica , Flebite/induzido quimicamente , Flebite/tratamento farmacológico , Flebite/epidemiologia , Antineoplásicos/uso terapêuticoRESUMO
INTRODUCTION: Chemotherapy is an integral part of cancer management which is associated with phlebitis in around 70% of patients receiving intravenous chemotherapy infusion. Thus, we aimed to estimate the incidence, severity, and management of phlebitis associated with chemotherapy infusion among cancer patients. METHODS: A prospective study was conducted among 145 patients receiving intravenous chemotherapy for the duration of six months in the oncology department. The relevant data for phlebitis was obtained and assessed using Phlebitis Grading Scale and Visual Analogue Scale for the assessment of severity and pain due to phlebitis, respectively. RESULTS: Out of 145 patients, female (56.6%) patients predominated over male patients (43.5%) with a mean age of 53.5 ± 11.82 years. Phlebitis was encountered in 30.34% of patients among whom 22.8% (33) were females followed by 7.6% were males and the majority of patients (13.1%) were from the 46 to 60 years age group. Phlebitis was observed frequently among stage 2 (11%) and satge 4 (11%) patients. The highest incidence of phlebitis was seen among hypertensive (34.09%) and diabetic patients (27.27%) followed by those receiving chemotherapy through the 20-gauge intravenous cannula (22.8%) and 22-gauge (6.9%). Platinum compounds (56.8%) were commonly associated with phlebitis, followed by cyclophosphamide (20.5%). Heparin and benzyl nicotinate topical gel were used to treat phlebitis. CONCLUSION: Platinum and cyclophosphamide are commonly associated with phlebitis which can be managed by topical heparin plus benzyl nicotinate. Phlebitis shouldn't be ignored as it has a high incidence, affects the quality of life, and increases the treatment burden.
Assuntos
Neoplasias , Flebite , Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Estudos Prospectivos , Qualidade de Vida , Infusões Intravenosas , Heparina/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias/complicações , Ciclofosfamida , Flebite/induzido quimicamente , Flebite/epidemiologia , Flebite/tratamento farmacológicoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Administration of 3% sodiumchloride through a peripheral venous catheter is associated with risk of infusion-related adverse events (IRAE) due to its high osmolarity. Given this concern and the paucity of data regarding these events,many hospitals have policies that require central line administration of 3% sodiumchloride. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this analysis was to evaluate the incidence of IRAE associated with peripheral administration of 3% sodium chloride. METHODS: This analysis included patients who received 3% sodium chloride via a peripheral venous catheter between May 2017 and August 2019. The major endpoint of this analysiswas the overall incidence of IRAE, defined as the documentation of infiltration or phlebitis. Amultivariable logistic regression was performed to identify potential risk factors (e.g., age, infusion rate, infusion duration, peripheral venous catheter location, and needle gauge) for development of IRAE. RESULTS: A total of 706 administrations in 422 patientswere included. Seventy-four (10.5%) administrations were associated with a documented event. Based on the Infusion Nurses grading scale for infiltration or phlebitis, 48% of the events in this analysiswere grade 1 in severity. Duration of infusion of 3% sodiumchloride was found to be associated with an increased odds of an IRAE (OR per 1 h 1.02, 95% CI 1.01-1.02) in the multivariable analysis. Age, infusion rate, peripheral venous catheter location, and needle gauge were not independently associated with an increased risk of an IRAE. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that IRAE occurred more frequently when 3% sodium chloride was administered over a longer duration and themajority of events weremild with no permanent tissue injury. Itmay be reasonable to consider peripheral administration of 3% sodium chloride in the acute care setting for a short duration, although additional studies are needed to continue to evaluate its safety.
Assuntos
Flebite , Cloreto de Sódio , Humanos , Infusões Intravenosas , Solução Salina Hipertônica/efeitos adversos , Flebite/induzido quimicamente , Flebite/epidemiologia , Cuidados CríticosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Venous catheterization for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes is part of routine hospital practice, as approximately 70% of hospitalized patients have a peripheral venous catheter (PVC). This practice, however, can lead to both local complications, (e.g., chemical, mechanical and infectious phlebitis) and systemic complications (e.g., PVC-related bloodstream infections [PVC-BSIs]). Surveillance data and activities are central to preventing nosocomial infections, phlebitis and improving patient care and safety. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of a care bundle on reducing PVC-BSI rates and phlebitis at a secondary care hospital in Mallorca, Spain. METHODS: Three-phase intervention study targeting hospitalized patients with a PVC. The VINCat criteria were used to define PVC-BSIs and calculate incidence. In phase I (August-December 2015), we retrospectively analyzed baseline PVC-BSI rates at our hospital. In phase II (2016-2017), we conducted safety rounds and developed a care bundle with the goal of reducing PVC-BSI rates. In phase III (2018), we expanded the PVC-BSI bundle to prevent phlebitis and analyzed its impact. RESULTS: The incidence of PVC-BSIs decreased from 0.48 episodes per 1000 patient-days in 2015 to 0.17 episodes per 1000 patient-days in 2018. The 2017 safety rounds also detected a reduction in phlebitis (from 4.6% of 2.6%). Overall, 680 healthcare professionals were trained in catheter care and five safety rounds were conducted to assess bedside care. CONCLUSION: Implementation of a care bundle significantly reduced PVC-BSI rates and phlebitis at our hospital. Continuous surveillance programs are needed to adapt measures to improve patient care and guarantee safety.
Assuntos
Pacotes de Assistência ao Paciente , Flebite , Sepse , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Atenção Secundária à Saúde , Hospitais , Flebite/epidemiologia , Flebite/etiologia , Flebite/prevenção & controle , CatéteresRESUMO
AIMS: Intravenous amiodarone is an irritant of peripheral blood vessels with phlebitis as an adverse effect. The aims were to determine the incidence of intravenous amiodarone-induced phlebitis, to describe adherence to a clinical practice guideline, and to determine how characteristics were distributed between those with and without phlebitis. METHODS AND RESULTS: A prospective observational study was conducted. Adult patients treated with amiodarone through a peripheral intravenous catheter (PIVC) or a central venous catheter were included. PIVC characteristics were measured using the PIVC mini questionnaire. Patients with ≥two signs of phlebitis were categorized as having phlebitis. Adherence to the clinical practice guideline was registered on a standard abstract sheet. Data were collected from the amiodarone start-up to 2 days after the amiodarone was discontinued. In total, 124 patients with amiodarone infusions were observed, of which 69% were administered via a PIVC. The phlebitis rate was 44%. Fifty-three per cent developed amiodarone-induced phlebitis during the infusion phase, while 47% presented phlebitis during the post-infusion phase. The three most observed signs or symptoms of phlebitis were redness (87%), pain (81%), and swelling (71%). The most commonly used PIVC site was the elbow, and 35% of the PIVCs were large (18 gauge), which was the last preferred site and size according to the clinical practice guideline. CONCLUSION: A large proportion of the patients developed amiodarone-induced phlebitis. The adherence to the clinical practice guideline was not optimal according to the PIVC recommendations. Prevention of amiodarone-induced phlebitis should have high priority to reduce patient harm.
Assuntos
Amiodarona , Cateterismo Periférico , Flebite , Adulto , Humanos , Amiodarona/efeitos adversos , Incidência , Flebite/induzido quimicamente , Flebite/epidemiologia , Cateterismo Periférico/efeitos adversos , Estudos ProspectivosRESUMO
The use of midline catheters has increased to reduce excessive use of central venous access devices, and additional data on midline catheter complications are needed. This study aimed to describe midline catheter complications among hospitalized patients. This retrospective study included a random sample of 300 hospitalized patients with a midline catheter insertion in 2019. The primary outcome was a composite end point of 8 complications: occlusion, bleeding at insertion site, infiltration/extravasation, catheter-related thrombosis, accidental removal, phlebitis, hematoma, and catheter-related infection. Midline catheter failure was defined as removal prior to the end of therapy due to complications. Among 300 midline catheters, the incidence of the composite end point of 1 or more midline complications was 38% (95% confidence interval, 33%-44%). Complications included occlusion (17.0%), bleeding at insertion site (12.0%), infiltration/extravasation (10.0%), catheter-related thrombosis (4.0%), accidental removal (3.0%), phlebitis (0.3%), hematoma (0.3%), and catheter-related infection (0.3%). Midline catheter failure occurred in 16% of midline catheters (n = 48) due to infiltration/extravasation (n = 27), accidental removal (n = 10), catheter-related thrombosis (n = 9), occlusion (n = 4), and catheter-related infection (n = 1). Three catheters had 2 types of failure. The most common complications of occlusion and bleeding rarely resulted in midline catheter failure. The most common causes of midline catheter failure were infiltration/extravasation, accidental removal, and catheter-related thrombosis.
Assuntos
Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter , Cateterismo Venoso Central , Cateterismo Periférico , Flebite , Trombose , Humanos , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/etiologia , Infecções Relacionadas a Cateter/complicações , Incidência , Estudos Retrospectivos , Catéteres/efeitos adversos , Flebite/epidemiologia , Flebite/etiologia , Trombose/etiologia , Trombose/complicações , Cateterismo Periférico/métodos , Hematoma/etiologia , Hematoma/complicações , Cateteres de Demora/efeitos adversosRESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To report the incidence and type of peripheral intravenous catheter complications in hospitalised dogs. METHODS: A prospective, observational trial was performed. Peripheral intravenous catheters were monitored for complications. Complications were documented and classified as extravasation, phlebitis, dislodgement, occlusion and line breakage. If phlebitis was present, the Visual Infusion Phlebitis Scale was used to assign a grade (0 to 5). Fisher's exact test was used to compare the type of complications between the critical care unit and the intermediate care unit. A univariate logistic model was used to compare the incidence of complications between the critical care unit and the intermediate care unit and adjusted odds ratios were used to compare the groups. RESULTS: The incidence of peripheral intravenous catheter complications was 24.2% in the Critical Care Unit and 13.1% in the Intermediate Care Unit, with an overall incidence of 19.9%. Phlebitis was the most common peripheral intravenous catheter complication in the Critical Care Unit, and line breakage was the most common complication in the Intermediate Care Unit. Length of hospitalisation and weight had a significant effect on the likelihood of complication. In a multivariable logistic regression model, the odds of a peripheral intravenous catheter complication was not significantly higher in CCU than IMCU, accounting for length of hospitalisation and weight (adjusted odds ratio, 1.84; 95% confidence interval, 0.98 to 3.48). CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Peripheral intravenous catheter complications are common in hospitalised dogs and may result in an increased expense for owners, failure to deliver prescribed treatments, venous depletion (lack of peripheral vessels for intravenous catheter placement) and pain experienced by the patient. Techniques to reduce peripheral intravenous catheter complications should be further evaluated and may include the use of peripheral intravenous catheter placement and maintenance checklists, use of force-activated separation devices, or patient sedation.