Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros










Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry ; 87(3): 247-51, 2016 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25802120

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Few studies have investigated the rates of recanalisation after cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT). Our objective was to investigate the recanalisation rate and to identify predictors of recanalisation in patients with CVT. METHODS: We included 102 patients with confirmed first-ever, non-septic CVT. All patients received anticoagulation for 12 months or until complete recanalisation. To assess recanalisation, patients underwent MR venography every 3 months until partial or complete recanalisation or for 12 months after diagnosis. We conducted two parallel analyses of complete recanalisation versus partial and no recanalisation versus any recanalisation. As a secondary objective we explored the influence of recanalisation on outcome and recurrent events. We calculated the probability of recanalisation using Kaplan-Meier analysis and conducted multivariate analysis using a Cox model. RESULTS: The mean age of patients was 33.5±11 years (80 (78.4%) women). Survival analysis indicated that 50% of the patients had any recanalisation (grades I, II and III) by 64 days and complete recanalisation (grade III) by 169 days. Adjusted Cox proportional model revealed that age <50 years (HR=11.5 95% CI=1.58 to 84.46, p=0.01) and isolated superior sagittal sinus thrombosis (HR=0.39, 95% CI=0.14 to 1.04, p=0.05) predict complete recanalisation, while age <50 years (HR=4.79; 95% CI=1.69 to 13.5, p=0.003) predicts any recanalisation. Patients with complete recanalisation had a greater chance of good functional outcome (HR=5.17; 95% CI=2.8 to 9.53, p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: We found that recanalisation occurs over time, until month 11. Complete recanalisation may influence functional outcome.


Assuntos
Anticoagulantes/uso terapêutico , Trombose Intracraniana/tratamento farmacológico , Flebografia/efeitos dos fármacos , Trombose Venosa/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Encéfalo/irrigação sanguínea , Feminino , Humanos , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neuroimagem , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Tempo , Adulto Jovem
2.
Acad Radiol ; 2(8): 683-6, 1995 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9419625

RESUMO

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: We compared the tolerance and efficacy of iohexol-300, a nonionic low-osmolar monomer, with those of ioxaglate-320, an ionic low-osmolar dimer, in lower limb phlebography. METHODS: One hundred twenty inpatients were randomly divided into two groups in this double-blind comparative study. Two hundred milliliters of contrast medium (100 ml per leg) was injected intravenously. The immediate tolerance was classified as discomfort (i.e., sensation of warmth, pain, coldness related to the injection) and adverse events occurring up to 1 hr after administration. Delayed tolerance was followed up to 8 days after the examination. The main parameter was immediate adverse events. Image quality was assessed by a radiologist using a visual analog scale. RESULTS: The number of immediate adverse events was significantly higher in the ioxaglate group (p < .02). The more frequent events were digestive disorders and skin rashes; 13 of these events were reported in the ioxaglate group, but none were reported in the iohexol group (p < .001). The other parameters were not significantly different in the two groups. CONCLUSION: We found a similar efficacy and a better tolerance of iohexol-300 than ioxaglate-320 in lower limb phlebography.


Assuntos
Meios de Contraste/efeitos adversos , Iohexol/efeitos adversos , Ácido Ioxáglico/efeitos adversos , Perna (Membro)/irrigação sanguínea , Flebografia/efeitos dos fármacos , Meios de Contraste/administração & dosagem , Relação Dose-Resposta a Droga , Método Duplo-Cego , Tolerância a Medicamentos , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Injeções Intravenosas , Iohexol/administração & dosagem , Ácido Ioxáglico/administração & dosagem , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Segurança
3.
Haemostasis ; 20(6): 362-7, 1990.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1965977

RESUMO

In the frame of a multicenter controlled study comparing the efficacy of low-molecular-weight heparin to standard heparin in the prevention of postsurgical thrombosis, 94 phlebograms were centrally evaluated by two independent radiologists. Three months after the first central evaluation, a new reading was performed with the same radiologists, and discrepancies were adjudicated by a senior radiologist. The number of discrepancies between the first and the second evaluation was high: 33 interpretations (35%) had a least one difference, including 14 (14.9%) discrepancies regarding the main issue, i.e. the presence of venous thrombosis. After the adjudication by the senior radiologist, this number decreased but was still large: 22 films (23.4%) with at least one discrepant item in all and 11 related to the presence of venous thrombosis. This report shows that venous thrombosis assessed by phlebography, which is usually considered as a golden standard in clinical trials, deserves a thorough quality control procedure.


Assuntos
Heparina de Baixo Peso Molecular/uso terapêutico , Heparina/uso terapêutico , Flebografia , Tromboflebite/prevenção & controle , Método Duplo-Cego , Estudos de Avaliação como Assunto , Humanos , Variações Dependentes do Observador , Flebografia/efeitos dos fármacos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Tromboflebite/diagnóstico por imagem
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...