Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 241
Filtrar
1.
J Orthop Surg Res ; 16(1): 449, 2021 Jul 13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34256792

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Occipital condyle fractures (OCFs) in patients before 18 years of age are rare. Classifications of OCF are based on the CT images of the cranio-cervical junction (CCJ) and MRI. The Anderson-Montesano and Tuli classifications are the types which are most commonly used in these cases. Classification of OCFs allows the implementation of OCF treatment. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of using the OCF classification in pediatric patients based on the analysis of our own cases. METHODS: During the years 2013-2020, 6 pediatric patients with OCFs, aged 14-18, have been treated. Two patients with unstable fracture III according to Anderson-Montesano and IIB according to Tuli were treated with the halo-vest. Additionally, one patient presenting neurological symptoms and with an associated C1 fracture was qualified for the halo-vest stabilization as well. The other patients were treated with a Minerva collar. We evaluated the results 6 months after completing the OCF treatment using the Neck Disability Index (NDI) and SF-36 questionnaires. Confidence intervals for the mean values were verified using the MeanCI function (from the R library DescTools) for both classical and bootstrap methods. RESULTS: Based on NDI results, we have obtained in our patients an average of 4.33/45 points (2-11) and 9.62% (4.4-24.4). Based on the SF-36 questionnaire, we obtained an average of 88.62% (47.41-99.44). CONCLUSION: The Anderson-Montesano and Tuli's classifications of OCF can be used to assess the stability of OCF in adolescents, but both classifications should be used simultaneously. CT and MR imaging should be used in diagnosing OCFs, whereas CT allows assessing therapeutic outcomes in OCF.


Assuntos
Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Osso Occipital/lesões , Fraturas Cranianas/classificação , Fraturas Cranianas/diagnóstico por imagem , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Adolescente , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino
2.
Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med ; 22(4): 249-254, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32250646

RESUMO

Importance: The nasal bone is one of the most commonly fractured bones of the midface. However, the frequency of coincident fractures of adjacent bones such as the frontal process of the maxillary bone, nasal septum, and medial or inferior orbital walls has not been fully evaluated. Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate the incidence of fractures of adjacent structures in the setting of a nasal bone fracture. Second, we propose a new classification system of nasal bone fractures with involvement of adjacent bony structures. Design, Setting, and Participants: One thousand, one hundred ninety-three patients with midfacial fractures were retrospectively reviewed. The characteristics of fractures of the nasal bone and the incidence of coincident fractures of the frontal process of maxilla, bony nasal septum, medial, or inferior orbital walls were analyzed. Exposure: All patients included in the study presented with nasal trauma. Main Outcomes and Measures: The coincident fractures of adjacent midfacial structures were assessed, and a new classification of midfacial fractures based on computed tomography (CT) scan images was proposed. Results: Among the 1193 cases, bilateral fractures of the nasal bone were most common (69.24%), and coexistent fracture of the frontal process of the maxilla and bony nasal septum was 66.89% and 42.25%, respectively. Coincident fracture of the orbital walls was observed in 16.51% of cases. The major etiology of fracture for the younger and elderly groups was falls, compared with assault as the most common etiology in the adult group. A classification scheme was generated in which fractures of the nasal bone were divided into five types depending on coexisting fractures of adjacent structures. Conclusions and Relevance: External force applied to the nasal bone can also lead to coexistent fracture of adjacent bony structures including the frontal process of the maxilla, nasal septum, and orbital walls. The proposed classification of nasal fracture based on CT imaging helps to incorporate coincident disruption of adjacent structures.


Assuntos
Traumatismo Múltiplo/diagnóstico , Osso Nasal/lesões , Fraturas Cranianas/diagnóstico , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Criança , Pré-Escolar , China/epidemiologia , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Fraturas Maxilares/classificação , Fraturas Maxilares/diagnóstico , Fraturas Maxilares/epidemiologia , Fraturas Maxilares/etiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Traumatismo Múltiplo/classificação , Traumatismo Múltiplo/epidemiologia , Traumatismo Múltiplo/etiologia , Septo Nasal/lesões , Fraturas Orbitárias/classificação , Fraturas Orbitárias/diagnóstico , Fraturas Orbitárias/epidemiologia , Fraturas Orbitárias/etiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fraturas Cranianas/classificação , Fraturas Cranianas/epidemiologia , Fraturas Cranianas/etiologia , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Índices de Gravidade do Trauma , Adulto Jovem
3.
Forensic Sci Med Pathol ; 15(2): 218-223, 2019 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30859375

RESUMO

Due to their anatomical location, occipital condylar fractures (OCFs) are usually not observed during traditional autopsies and are therefore considered a rare injury. The aim of this study was to determine the true frequency of OCFs using post-mortem computed tomography (PMCT) in traumatic casualties. We retrospectively analyzed 438 PMCT studies of victims of traffic accidents, falls from height, violence, and low-energy head injuries (324 males and 114 females). OCFs were present in 22.6% of cases (n = 99), mostly in victims of railway accidents (48.5%, n = 17), falls from height (26.6%, n = 29), cyclists (24%, n = 6), and pedestrians hit by cars (22.5%, n = 29). Isolated OCFs were found in 5.5% of cases (n = 24), most often in cyclists (12%, n = 3) and pedestrians (9.3%, n = 12) hit by cars. There were no OCFs in the cases of fatalities caused by violence or accidental low-energy head injury. PMCT scans revealed that OCFs are common in high-energy injury fatalities and can be useful for determining the mechanism of trauma more precisely.


Assuntos
Osso Occipital/diagnóstico por imagem , Osso Occipital/lesões , Fraturas Cranianas/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas Cranianas/epidemiologia , Acidentes por Quedas/estatística & dados numéricos , Acidentes de Trânsito/estatística & dados numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto , Distribuição por Idade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Ciclismo/estatística & dados numéricos , Traumatismos Craniocerebrais/mortalidade , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Pedestres/estatística & dados numéricos , Abuso Físico/estatística & dados numéricos , Polônia/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Distribuição por Sexo , Fraturas Cranianas/classificação , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Adulto Jovem
4.
J Craniofac Surg ; 30(3): e251-e254, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30839456

RESUMO

Nasal fractures are the most common facial bone fractures, and soft tissue injuries are frequently accompanied. This study intends to make a deep analysis on the relationship between the 2.Patients diagnosed with nasal fracture between 2015 and 2017 were included. Patients younger than 17 years and those with previous facial fractures or aesthetic surgeries were excluded. Nasal fractures were classified according to the Stranc-Robertson (S-R) classification, and the severity of soft tissue injury was evaluated by length and depth. The authors compared the frequency of soft tissue injury between frontal and lateral groups. Second, the authors investigated whether the incidence of soft tissue injuries increases as a function of the increase in the S-R classification both in frontal and lateral group (from plane I to III). The authors also analyzed the difference in severity of soft tissue injuries in each group. Pearson chi-square analysis, linear by linear and Jonckheere-Terpstra tests were used for statistical analysis.Of 621 patients, 296 were frontal plane and 325 were lateral plane. The frontal group had a higher incidence of soft tissue injury than the lateral group (P = 0.004). The incidence of soft tissue injury and severity by depth increased as a function of the increase in the S-R classification only in the frontal group (P = 0.046, 0.019).In nasal fractures, frontal impact is more associated with frequency and severity of soft tissue injury than lateral impact. This seems to be related to the anatomical characteristics of nasal area and mechanism of injuries in each group.


Assuntos
Osso Nasal/lesões , Fraturas Cranianas/classificação , Fraturas Cranianas/complicações , Lesões dos Tecidos Moles/complicações , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Índices de Gravidade do Trauma , Adulto Jovem
5.
Radiologia (Engl Ed) ; 61(3): 204-214, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês, Espanhol | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30777299

RESUMO

Fractures of the petrous part of the temporal bone are a common lesion of the base of the skull; most of these fractures result from high-energy trauma. In patients with multiple trauma, these injuries can be detected on CT scans of the head and neck, where the direct and indirect signs are usually sufficient to establish the diagnosis. It is important to these fractures because the temporal bone has critical structures and the complexity of this region increases the risk of error unless special care is taken. This article reviews the key anatomical points, the systematization of the imaging findings, and the classifications used for temporal bone fracture. We emphasize the usefulness of identifying and describing the findings in relation to important structures in this region, of looking for unseen fractures suspected through indirect signs, and of identifying anatomical structures that can simulate fractures. We point out that the classical classifications of these fractures are less useful, although they continue to be used for treatment decisions.


Assuntos
Osso Petroso/lesões , Fraturas Cranianas/classificação , Fraturas Cranianas/diagnóstico por imagem , Cóclea/diagnóstico por imagem , Cóclea/lesões , Orelha/anatomia & histologia , Orelha/diagnóstico por imagem , Meato Acústico Externo/diagnóstico por imagem , Meato Acústico Externo/lesões , Ossículos da Orelha/diagnóstico por imagem , Ossículos da Orelha/lesões , Nervo Facial/anatomia & histologia , Nervo Facial/diagnóstico por imagem , Traumatismos do Nervo Facial/diagnóstico por imagem , Humanos , Osso Petroso/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas Cranianas/complicações , Avaliação de Sintomas , Osso Temporal/anatomia & histologia , Osso Temporal/diagnóstico por imagem , Osso Temporal/lesões
6.
Plast Surg Nurs ; 39(1): 22-24, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30801495

RESUMO

This study investigated the use of endonasal infiltrative anesthesia for the management of pain associated with nasal bone fracture reduction. Fifty-two patients with nasal bone fractures were distributed in 2 groups. In the first group, topical endonasal anesthesia and external transcutaneous infiltrative anesthesia were employed. In the second group, endonasal infiltrative anesthesia was also added. Visual analog scale pain scores related to the different steps of the procedure were registered. The addition of endonasal infiltrative anesthesia was associated with a significant decrease (p < .05) in pain during reduction maneuvers (6.71 vs. 4.83) and nasal packing (5.18 vs. 3.46). Addition of endonasal infiltrative anesthesia is an effective method of pain reduction during nasal bone fracture treatment.


Assuntos
Anestesia Local/métodos , Anestésicos Locais/administração & dosagem , Osso Nasal/lesões , Dor Processual/tratamento farmacológico , Fraturas Cranianas/cirurgia , Administração Intranasal/métodos , Redução Fechada/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Injeções , Masculino , Osso Nasal/cirurgia , Distribuição Aleatória , Fraturas Cranianas/classificação , Escala Visual Analógica
7.
J Craniofac Surg ; 29(7): 1825-1828, 2018 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30234714

RESUMO

Since the nose is at the center of the face, small changes to it can cause a big overall change. Therefore, a nasal fracture needs to be operated on when deformity is expected. Although many taxonomies have been developed for nasal bone fractures, no study has aimed to predict individual patient satisfaction. Herein, the authors tried to determine any correlation between the existing classifications of nasal bone fractures and subjective patient satisfaction. A retrospective study and telephone survey were conducted in 149 patients who underwent closed reduction for a pure nasal bone fracture. Pretraumatic, prereduction, and postoperative patient satisfactions were measured on a numerical scale from 1 to 5. The difference between pretraumatic and prereduction satisfactions was calculated to confirm the change in short-term satisfaction after trauma. The difference between pretraumatic and preoperative satisfactions was measured to determine change in long-term satisfaction postoperatively. The Stranc Robertson classification, modified Murray classification, and the presence of septal fracture were used to classify fractures. Independent and Jonckheere-Terpstra t tests were used in statistical analysis. Only 86 of 149 were included in the study. There was no significant difference in patient satisfaction among frontal/lateral (P = 0.70, 0.56), frontal I/II (P = 1.00, 0.24), and lateral I/II groups (P = 0.57, 0.67) according to the Stranc Robertson classification. Septal fracture (P = 0.21, 0.44) and the modified Murray classification (P = 0.14, 0.47) also had no effect on satisfaction. Existing classification systems have the advantage of reflecting and distinguishing the characteristics of fractures, but there is a limit in their ability to reflect subjective patient satisfaction.


Assuntos
Fixação de Fratura/métodos , Osso Nasal/diagnóstico por imagem , Satisfação do Paciente , Fraturas Cranianas/classificação , Adulto , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Osso Nasal/lesões , Osso Nasal/cirurgia , Período Pós-Operatório , Estudos Retrospectivos , Rinoplastia/métodos , Fraturas Cranianas/diagnóstico , Fraturas Cranianas/cirurgia , Inquéritos e Questionários , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Resultado do Tratamento
8.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 76(10): 2168.e1-2168.e7, 2018 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30009786

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The frontal sinus shows a wide range of morphologic variations. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of frontal sinus size on fracture characteristics in frontal bone trauma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, data from patients with traumatic fractures of the frontal bone were retrospectively collected from the institution's database. Radiometric analysis of computed tomography and cone-beam computed tomography datasets was performed. Frontal sinus size was measured as variables of height, width, and depth. The secondary predictor was morphologic sinus type according to Guerram's classification: hyperplasia, medium size, hypoplasia, or aplasia of the frontal sinus. To determine outcomes, we classified fractures into the following categories: fracture isolated to the anterior table, combined fractures of the anterior and posterior tables, fracture isolated to the posterior table, and frontal bone fracture without sinus involvement. Further study variables were patients' demographic characteristics, combined midfacial fractures, orbital rim involvement, fracture displacement, and surgical approach. For statistical analysis, fracture types were assessed for frontal sinus metric size and morphologic type using bivariate tests with P < .05 defined as significant. RESULTS: We enrolled 53 consecutive patients with a mean age of 35 years; male patients comprised 91%. Fracture types differed significantly in sinus width and height (both P < .001), as well as depth (P = .002). Frontal sinus morphology was hyperplastic in 66%, medium in 30.2%, and hypoplastic in 3.8%. Patients with a hyperplastic frontal sinus had an increased likelihood of isolated anterior table fractures (odds ratio, 6.0; P = .007) compared with medium-sized types. Fractures without sinus involvement were more likely in hypoplastic and medium types (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The morphology of the frontal sinus determines the probability of fracture types from craniofacial trauma. Thus the frontal sinus size appears to be a major factor for frontal bone resistance to traumatic force impingement.


Assuntos
Seio Frontal/anatomia & histologia , Seio Frontal/lesões , Fraturas Cranianas/classificação , Adulto , Variação Anatômica , Tomografia Computadorizada de Feixe Cônico , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fraturas Cranianas/diagnóstico por imagem , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X
9.
Mil Med ; 183(suppl_1): 287-293, 2018 03 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29635601

RESUMO

Military combat helmets protect the wearer from a variety of battlefield threats, including projectiles. Helmet back-face deformation (BFD) is the result of the helmet defeating a projectile and deforming inward. Back-face deformation can result in localized blunt impacts to the head. A method was developed to investigate skull injury due to BFD behind-armor blunt trauma. A representative impactor was designed from the BFD profiles of modern combat helmets subjected to ballistic impacts. Three post-mortem human subject head specimens were each impacted using the representative impactor at three anatomical regions (frontal bone, right/left temporo-parietal regions) using a pneumatic projectile launcher. Thirty-six impacts were conducted at energy levels between 5 J and 25 J. Fractures were detected in two specimens. Two of the specimens experienced temporo-parietal fractures while the third specimen experienced no fractures. Biomechanical metrics, including impactor acceleration, were obtained for all tests. The work presented herein describes initial research utilizing a test method enabling the collection of dynamic exposure and biomechanical response data for the skull at the BFD-head interface.


Assuntos
Dispositivos de Proteção da Cabeça/normas , Fraturas Cranianas/classificação , Fenômenos Biomecânicos , Desenho de Equipamento/normas , Desenho de Equipamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Balística Forense/instrumentação , Balística Forense/métodos , Dispositivos de Proteção da Cabeça/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Crânio/lesões , Crânio/patologia , Crânio/fisiopatologia , Guerra/estatística & dados numéricos
10.
Radiographics ; 38(1): 248-274, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29320322

RESUMO

The advent of titanium hardware, which provides firm three-dimensional positional control, and the exquisite bone detail afforded by multidetector computed tomography (CT) have spurred the evolution of subunit-specific midfacial fracture management principles. The structural, diagnostic, and therapeutic complexity of the individual midfacial subunits, including the nose, the naso-orbito-ethmoidal region, the internal orbits, the zygomaticomaxillary complex, and the maxillary occlusion-bearing segment, are not adequately reflected in the Le Fort classification system, which provides only a general framework and has become less relevant in contemporary practice. The purpose of this article is to facilitate the involvement of radiologists in the delivery of individualized multidisciplinary care to adults who have sustained blunt trauma and have midfacial fractures by providing a clinically relevant review of the role of multidetector CT in the management of each midfacial subunit. Surgically relevant anatomic structures, search patterns, critical CT findings and their management implications, contemporary classification systems, and common posttraumatic and postoperative complications are emphasized. ©RSNA, 2018.


Assuntos
Traumatismos Faciais/diagnóstico por imagem , Tomografia Computadorizada Multidetectores/métodos , Fraturas Cranianas/diagnóstico por imagem , Traumatismos Faciais/classificação , Traumatismos Faciais/cirurgia , Humanos , Imageamento Tridimensional , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas Cranianas/classificação , Fraturas Cranianas/cirurgia
11.
World Neurosurg ; 109: e305-e312, 2018 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28989045

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The most common birth-associated head injuries during vaginal delivery are cephalhematomas and subgaleal hematomas. Cranial injuries are rarely encountered. The neonate cranium is soft and pliable, and greenstick skull fractures (GSFs) are expected to be more frequent than linear or depressed fractures, but they are extremely difficult to detect with simple skull radiography. As a result, no reports have been issued on this topic to date. Recent reports suggest that technological advances in 3-dimensional (3D) computed tomography (CT) have successfully enhanced the diagnostic accuracy for cranial fractures. The authors researched the types and characteristics of GSFs and the diagnostic accuracy of 3D CT for cranial fractures in neonates. METHODS: The simple skull radiographs and 3D CT images of 101 neonates were retrospectively evaluated and compared with respect to diagnosis of cranial fractures, and skull GSFs were classified on the basis of 3D CT findings into 5 types depending on multiplicity and location. RESULTS: 3D CT detected 88 cases of cranial fractures, that is, 89 GSFs, 4 combined GSFs and linear fractures, and 3 combined GSFs and depressed fractures. The diagnostic rate of 3DCT was 91% and this was significantly higher than the 13% rate of simple skull radiographs (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: GSFs rather than linear fractures were found to account for most cranial injuries among neonates. The diagnostic accuracy of 3D CT was considerably superior than simple skull radiography, but the high radiation exposure levels of 3D CT warrant the need for development of a modality with lower radiation exposure.


Assuntos
Traumatismos do Nascimento/diagnóstico por imagem , Processamento de Imagem Assistida por Computador , Imageamento Tridimensional , Fratura do Crânio com Afundamento/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas Cranianas/diagnóstico por imagem , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Traumatismos do Nascimento/classificação , Traumatismos do Nascimento/epidemiologia , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Fratura do Crânio com Afundamento/classificação , Fratura do Crânio com Afundamento/epidemiologia , Fraturas Cranianas/classificação , Fraturas Cranianas/epidemiologia
12.
J Craniofac Surg ; 28(7): 1687-1693, 2017 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28834831

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The unique anatomy of the orbita and the different behavior of each malignant tumor cause us to perform the various types of orbital exenteration that yields to varying defect each of which has own specific demands in terms of the reconstruction. Current classification of orbital exenteration defects seems not to be adequate to provide detailed description. This study reviews 50 exenteration defects to offer a more effective anatomical classification system. METHODS: Over a 15 years period, 50 orbital exenteration defects in 47 patients were reconstructed. Defects were categorized according to the resected orbital wall, dura, and ethmoid resection. If the maxillectomy was performed, A or B was added to define the type of maxillectomy as partial (intact palate) or total maxillectomy, respectively. According to these criteria, 4 types of defect patterns were determined including Type 0 (n = 5) with intact orbital wall, Type I (n = 9) with sino-orbital fistula, Type II (n = 4) with crania-orbital fistula with intact dura, Type III (n = 6) with crania-orbital fistula associated with dura defect, and Type IV (n = 8) with cranio-nasal-orbital fistula. There were 12 partial (A) and 6 total maxillectomy (B) defects along with the orbital exenteration. RESULTS: There was no major complication except one. The minor wound-healing problems occurred in 7 patients. Nine patients (19%) used prosthesis. Twenty-two (46.8%) patients chose a patch to cover the area. The remaining 16 patients were not able to use any type of prosthesis because of the reconstruction methods. CONCLUSION: The authors believe that the authors' anatomical classification system provides more precise description of the defect which eventually enhances the success rate of both reconstruction and resection.


Assuntos
Órbita , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica/métodos , Fraturas Cranianas , Humanos , Órbita/lesões , Órbita/patologia , Órbita/cirurgia , Próteses e Implantes , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fraturas Cranianas/classificação , Fraturas Cranianas/cirurgia
13.
J Laryngol Otol ; 131(3): 209-214, 2017 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28124635

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical and radiological aspects of otic capsule sparing temporal bone fractures. METHODS: Using medical records, 188 temporal bones of 173 patients with otic capsule sparing temporal bone fractures were evaluated. Otoscopic findings and symptoms, facial paralysis, and hearing loss were assessed. RESULTS: Using regional analysis, 7 fractures were classified as type I, 85 as type II, 169 as type III and 114 as type IV. Fourteen of the 17 facial paralysis cases improved to House-Brackmann grade II or lower at an average of 57.6 days after the initial evaluation. Thirty-one patients underwent initial and follow-up pure tone audiometry examinations. The air-bone gap closed significantly from 27.2 dB at an average of 21.8 days post-trauma to 19.6 dB at an average of 79.9 days post-trauma, without the need for surgical intervention. CONCLUSION: Initial conservative treatment for facial paralysis or conductive hearing loss is possible in otic capsule sparing fracture cases after careful evaluation of the patient.


Assuntos
Paralisia Facial/etiologia , Perda Auditiva Condutiva/etiologia , Fraturas Cranianas/diagnóstico por imagem , Osso Temporal/lesões , Adulto , Audiometria de Tons Puros , Tratamento Conservador , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Otoscopia , Radiografia/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fraturas Cranianas/classificação , Fraturas Cranianas/complicações , Osso Temporal/diagnóstico por imagem , Membrana Timpânica
14.
Pediatr Emerg Care ; 33(11): 745-747, 2017 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26785091

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to compare the traditional and newer temporal bone fracture classification systems and their reliability in predicting serious outcomes of hearing loss and facial nerve (FN) injury. METHODS: We queried the medical record database for hospital visits from 2002 to 2013 related to the search term temporal. A total of 1144 records were identified, and of these, 46 records with documented temporal bone fractures were reviewed for patient age, etiology and classification of the temporal bone fracture, FN examination, and hearing status. Of these records, radiology images were available for 38 patients and 40 fractures. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients with accessible radiologic studies, aged 10 months to 16 years, were identified as having 40 temporal bone fractures for which the otolaryngology service was consulted. Twenty fractures (50.0%) were classified as longitudinal, 5 (12.5%) as transverse, and 15 (37.5%) as mixed. Using the otic capsule sparing (OCS)/violating nomenclature, 32 (80.0%) of fractures were classified as OCS, 2 (5.0%) otic capsule violating (OCV), and 6 (15.0%) could not be classified using this system. The otic capsule was involved in 1 (5%) of the longitudinal fractures, none of the transverse fractures, and 1 (6.7%) of the mixed fractures. Sensorineural hearing loss was found in only 2 fractures (5.0%) and conductive hearing loss (CHL) in 6 fractures (15.0%). Two fractures (5.0%) had ipsilateral facial palsy but no visualized fracture through the course of the FN canal. Neither the longitudinal/transverse/mixed nor OCS/OCV classifications were predictors of sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL), CHL, or FN involvement by Fisher exact statistical analysis (for SNHL: P = 0.37 vs 0.16; for CHL: P = 0.71 vs 0.33; for FN: P = 0.62 vs 0.94, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In this large pediatric series, neither classification system of longitudinal/transverse/mixed nor OCS/OCV was predictive of SNHL, CHL, or FN palsy. A more robust database of audiologic results would be helpful in demonstrating this relationship.


Assuntos
Paralisia Facial/etiologia , Perda Auditiva/etiologia , Fraturas Cranianas/classificação , Osso Temporal/lesões , Adolescente , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Fraturas Cranianas/complicações
15.
J Forensic Sci ; 62(1): 30-38, 2017 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27864928

RESUMO

Distinguishing between accidental and abusive head trauma in children can be difficult, as there is a lack of baseline data for pediatric cranial fracture patterns. A porcine head model has recently been developed and utilized in a series of studies to investigate the effects of impact energy level, surface type, and constraint condition on cranial fracture patterns. In the current study, an automated pattern recognition method, or a fracture printing interface (FPI), was developed to classify cranial fracture patterns that were associated with different impact scenarios documented in previous experiments. The FPI accurately predicted the energy level when the impact surface type was rigid. Additionally, the FPI was exceedingly successful in determining fractures caused by skulls being dropped with a high-level energy (97% accuracy). The FPI, currently developed on the porcine data, may in the future be transformed to the task of cranial fracture pattern classification for human infant skulls.


Assuntos
Antropologia Forense/métodos , Aprendizado de Máquina , Fraturas Cranianas/classificação , Software , Acidentes , Animais , Criança , Maus-Tratos Infantis/diagnóstico , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Humanos , Modelos Animais , Suínos
16.
Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 20(4): 377-383, 2016 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27663240

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Maxillofacial fractures occur in a significant proportion worldwide and can occur as an isolated injury or in combination with other severe injuries including cranial, spinal, and upper and lower body injuries requiring prompt diagnosis with possible emergency interventions. The epidemiology of facial fractures varies with regard to injury type, severity, and cause and depends on the population studied. Hence, understanding of these factors can aid in establishing clinical and research priorities for effective treatment and prevention of these injuries. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this present retrospective study, we provide a comprehensive overview regarding cranio-maxillofacial trauma on 3611 patients to assist the clinician in assessment and management of this unique highly specialized area of traumatology. A preformed pro forma was used to analyze the medical records of patients treated for facial trauma in The Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Meenakshi Ammal Dental College and Hospital, Chennai. The distribution according to age, gender, etiology, type of injury, time interval between accident and treatment, loss of consciousness, facial bones involved, pattern of fracture lines, treatment offered, and postoperative complications were recorded and evaluated. RESULTS: We inferred male patients sustained more injuries mostly in the third decade of age. Road traffic accidents were the most common cause of injury. Mandible was the most commonly fractured bone in the facial skeleton. Soft tissue injuries occurred more in road traffic accidents and upper lip was the commonest site of injury. CONCLUSION: Our study provides insights into the epidemiology of facial injuries and associated factors and can be useful not only in developing prevention strategies but also for grading the existing legal regulations and also for framing a more effective treatment protocol.


Assuntos
Traumatismos Maxilofaciais/diagnóstico , Traumatismos Maxilofaciais/epidemiologia , Fraturas Cranianas/diagnóstico , Fraturas Cranianas/epidemiologia , Acidentes de Trânsito , Adulto , Ossos Faciais/lesões , Ossos Faciais/cirurgia , Feminino , Fixação Interna de Fraturas , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Fraturas Mandibulares/classificação , Fraturas Mandibulares/diagnóstico , Fraturas Mandibulares/epidemiologia , Fraturas Mandibulares/cirurgia , Fraturas Maxilares/classificação , Fraturas Maxilares/diagnóstico , Fraturas Maxilares/epidemiologia , Fraturas Maxilares/cirurgia , Traumatismos Maxilofaciais/classificação , Traumatismos Maxilofaciais/cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fraturas Cranianas/classificação , Fraturas Cranianas/cirurgia , Lesões dos Tecidos Moles/classificação , Lesões dos Tecidos Moles/diagnóstico , Lesões dos Tecidos Moles/epidemiologia , Lesões dos Tecidos Moles/cirurgia
17.
Injury ; 47(7): 1388-92, 2016 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26971084

RESUMO

The changing complexity of maxillofacial fractures in recent years has created a situation where classical systems of classification of maxillofacial injuries fall short of defining trauma particularly that observed with high-velocity collisions where more than one region of the maxillofacial skeleton is affected. Trauma scoring systems designed specifically for the maxillofacial region are aimed to provide a more accurate assessment of the injury, its prognosis, the possible treatment outcomes, economics, length of hospital stay, and triage. The evolution and logic of such systems along with their merits and demerits are discussed. The author also proposes a new system to aid users in quickly and methodically choosing the system best suited to their needs without having to study a plethora of literature available in order to isolate their choice.


Assuntos
Ossos Faciais/lesões , Traumatismos Maxilofaciais/classificação , Fraturas Cranianas/classificação , Centros de Traumatologia , Técnicas de Apoio para a Decisão , Humanos , Escala de Gravidade do Ferimento , Traumatismos Maxilofaciais/diagnóstico , Prognóstico , Fraturas Cranianas/diagnóstico , Triagem
18.
Arch Kriminol ; 238(5-6): 207-217, 2016 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês, Alemão | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29465869

RESUMO

In Germany, suicides by firearms are not very common in contrast to deaths by hanging and intoxications. The use of historical muzzle-loading firearms in the context of suicides is a rarity. Contact shots from muzzle loaders cause an unusual wound morphology with extensive soot soiling. We report the case of a 59-year-old man, who committed a planned complex suicide by shooting into his mouth with a replica percussion gun in combination with hanging. The gunshot injury showed strong explosive effects in the oral cavity with fractures of the facial bones and the skull associated with cerebral evisceration (so-called Krönlein shot). Due to the special constellation of the case with hanging immediately after the shot, external bleeding from the head injuries was only moderate. Therefore, the head injuries could be assessed and partially reconstructed already at the scene.


Assuntos
Asfixia/patologia , Traumatismos por Explosões/patologia , Armas de Fogo/classificação , Traumatismos Cranianos Penetrantes/patologia , Fraturas Cranianas/patologia , Suicídio/classificação , Ferimentos por Arma de Fogo/patologia , Causas de Morte , Armas de Fogo/legislação & jurisprudência , Traumatismos Cranianos Penetrantes/classificação , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Boca/lesões , Boca/patologia , Fraturas Cranianas/classificação , Fuligem , Suicídio/legislação & jurisprudência , Ferimentos por Arma de Fogo/classificação
19.
Facial Plast Surg ; 31(4): 351-6, 2015 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26372709

RESUMO

Fractures of the midface and internal orbit occur isolated or in combination with other injuries. Frequently, the patients are first seen in emergency rooms responsible for the coordination of initial diagnostic procedures, followed by the transfer to specialties for further treatment. It is, therefore, important for all physicians treating facial trauma patients to understand the basic principles of injuries to the midface. Thus, this article aims to describe the anatomy and the current classification systems in use, the related clinical symptoms, and the essential diagnostic measures to obtain precise information about the injury pattern.


Assuntos
Traumatismos Maxilofaciais/diagnóstico , Órbita/lesões , Fraturas Cranianas/diagnóstico , Traumatismos dos Nervos Cranianos/diagnóstico , Traumatismos Oculares/diagnóstico , Humanos , Traumatismos Maxilofaciais/classificação , Traumatismos Maxilofaciais/diagnóstico por imagem , Boca/lesões , Cavidade Nasal/lesões , Órbita/diagnóstico por imagem , Fraturas Cranianas/classificação , Fraturas Cranianas/diagnóstico por imagem , Avaliação de Sintomas , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X
20.
J Neurosurg Pediatr ; 16(4): 472-6, 2015 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26186359

RESUMO

In the late 18th and early 19th centuries, Dr. John Howship, a pioneering British surgeon, described the clinical features and pathophysiology of various surgical disorders of the human body. His critical contributions to pediatric neurosurgery came in 1816 when he first described the features of an important childhood condition following head trauma, what he referred to as parietal bone absorption. This condition as depicted by Dr. Howship was soon to be christened by later scholars as traumatic cephalhydrocele, traumatic meningocele, leptomeningeal cyst, meningocele spuria, fibrosing osteitis, cerebrocranial erosion, and growing skull fracture. Nevertheless, the basic features of the condition as observed by Dr. Howship were virtually identical to the characteristics of the above-mentioned disorders. This article describes the life and accomplishments of Dr. Howship and his contributions to the current understanding of growing skull fracture.


Assuntos
Dura-Máter/lesões , Encefalocele/história , Neurocirurgia/história , Osso Parietal/lesões , Fraturas Cranianas/história , Cistos Aracnóideos/complicações , Cistos Aracnóideos/cirurgia , Reabsorção Óssea/etiologia , Reabsorção Óssea/fisiopatologia , Transplante Ósseo , Pré-Escolar , Traumatismos Craniocerebrais/complicações , Traumatismos Craniocerebrais/fisiopatologia , Progressão da Doença , Dura-Máter/patologia , Encefalocele/classificação , Encefalocele/etiologia , Encefalocele/cirurgia , Cirurgia Geral/história , História do Século XVIII , História do Século XIX , Humanos , Lactente , Londres , Museus , Osso Parietal/irrigação sanguínea , Osso Parietal/fisiopatologia , Próteses e Implantes , Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica , Fraturas Cranianas/classificação , Fraturas Cranianas/etiologia , Fraturas Cranianas/cirurgia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...