Data mining and analysis of the adverse events derived signals of 4 gadolinium-based contrast agents based on the US Food and drug administration adverse event reporting system.

BACKGROUND: To detect and analyze risk signals of the drug-related adverse events (AEs) of 4 gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) (gadopentetate dimeglumine (Gd-DTPA), gadobenate dimeglumine (Gd-BOPTA), gadoteridol (Gd-HP-DO3A), and gadobutrol (Gd-BT-DO3A)) according to the US Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database and ensure the clinical safety. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The AEs that are associated with the 4 GBCAs were collected from the FAERS database from 2004Q1 to 2022Q3. The risk signals were mined using reporting odds ratio (ROR) and proportional reporting ratio (PRR). RESULTS: 424 risk signals were excavated, in which 151 risk signals were associated with Gd-DTPA, 93 risk signals were related to Gd-BOPTA, 79 risk signals were relevant to Gd-HP-DO3A, and 101 risk signals were associated with Gd-BT-DO3A. The AE signals involved 20 system organ classes (SOCs). Two of the top four SOCs were identical, namely 'skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders' and 'general disorders and administration site conditions.' CONCLUSIONS: The safety signals of 4 GBCAs were detected, and the SOCs associated with the AEs of the 4 GBCAs were different. Besides, some AEs obtained in this study were not mentioned in the package inserts, which need more attention and research to ensure the clinical safety.

A Grade â ¢ Severe Hypersensitivity Caused by Gadopentatic Acid Injection: A Case Report.

BACKGROUND: Gadopentetic acid is a common contrast agent for enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Adverse reactions due to gadolinium-based contrast agents are rare and easily overlooked by medical staff. A patient developed a rash as the first symptom and quickly developed a severe allergic reaction after receiving gadopentetic acid. PATIENT PRESENTATION: A 74-year-old female patient was admitted on January 11, 2022, for femur magnetic resonance imaging. At 12:05 pm, a routine intravenous rapid injection of gadopentetic acid (15 ml) was given. Two minutes after administration, the patient developed skin itching. No obvious rash was found, but a 10 mg intravenous injection of dexamethasone was given. RECOUNT OF EVENTS: After 1 minute, skin pruritus had not improved significantly, saliva secretion had increased significantly, and a general discomfort appeared. At 12:10 pm, outside the scanning room, the patient suddenly became unconscious; 1 mg of EPINEPHrine was injected intramuscularly, and oxygen was given through a mask. Heart rate, blood pressure, and oxygen saturation steadily dropped. The patient was transferred to the intensive care unit. After EPINEPHrine, norepinephrine, terlipressin, and dexamethasone treatments, the vital signs eventually stabilized. The patient was judged to have had a grade III severe allergic reaction according to the first aid guidelines for severe allergic reactions in China. The patient was discharged from the hospital on the morning of January 14. CONCLUSION: This case stresses the importance of being equipped with the medicines, items, supplies, and equipment needed for emergency treatments in all departments where contrast agents are used. Patients with apparently mild adverse reactions to contrast agents should not be overlooked.

Use of Real-Life Safety Data From International Pharmacovigilance Databases to Assess the Importance of Symptoms Associated With Gadolinium Exposure.

OBJECTIVE: Recent scientific publications have reported cases of patients who complained from a variety of symptoms after they received a gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA). The aim of this study was to appreciate the importance of these clinical manifestations in the overall population by assessing the weight of "symptoms associated with gadolinium exposure" (SAGE) among the bulk of safety experiences reported to major health authorities. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Symptoms associated with gadolinium exposure were identified from a review of the scientific literature, and the corresponding preferred terms were searched in each system organ class (SOC) category recorded in the European and North American pharmacovigilance databases EudraVigilance (EV) and FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), respectively. The numbers of SAGE per preferred term, and cumulatively per SOC, were recorded and their weights in the overall spectrum of adverse events (AEs) were determined for each GBCA. RESULTS: The analysis of the selected AEs revealed a significantly higher SAGE weight for gadobenate dimeglumine (EV: 25.83%, FAERS: 32.24%) than for gadoteridol (EV: 15.51%; FAERS: 21.13%) and significantly lower SAGE weights for gadobutrol (EV: 7.75%; FAERS: 13.31%) and gadoterate meglumine (EV: 8.66%; FAERS: 12.99%). A similar ranking was found for most of the SOCs except for "nervous system disorders," probably owing to a limitation in the methods of data selection. Furthermore, this analysis showed a greater percentage of reports mentioning a decrease in the quality of life of the patients when they were exposed to gadobenate dimeglumine or gadoteridol than to gadobutrol or gadoterate meglumine. CONCLUSION: This study showed that SAGE represent a significant percentage of the bulk of AEs reported to the health authorities for each GBCA. It provided real-life arguments suggesting that SAGE may be more prevalent with linear than macrocyclic GBCAs and that gadoteridol may present a higher SAGE risk than the other macrocyclic contrast agents.

Risk of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF) in oncology patients receiving gadoxetic acid and updated risk of estimate of NSF in patients receiving gadoxetic acid with moderate and severe renal impairment.

OBJECTIVES: Gadoxetic acid (GA) is a half-biliary excreted gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA) administered at lower dose than gadobenic acid with similar ionic structure. Gadobenic acid is considered low-risk for nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF) in patients with impaired renal function; however, safety of GA is unclear. The objective of this study was to determine the incidence of NSF in oncology patients undergoing GA-enhanced MRI and to update the risk estimate of NSF in patients receiving GA with severe renal impairment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively identified GA-enhanced MRI performed for treatment planning in confirmed cancer patients between March 2011 and December 2020. Serum creatinine values within 180 days of GA administration were retrieved and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) calculated. The eGFR value nearest to each MRI examination was used. The search result was linked to a prospectively maintained registry of reported cases of NSF. An updated literature review was conducted to identify published cases of NSF related to GA administration in patients with severe renal impairment (eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 or on dialysis) and the incidence of NSF with 95% confidence intervals (CI) was determined combining published data with our results. RESULTS: 192 oncology patients underwent GA-enhanced MRI, mean age was 65.6 ± 11.8 years with 73 women. The mean eGFR was 89.6 ± 33.0 mL/min/1.73 m2. There were 33 patients with moderate (eGFR 30-60 mL/min/1.73 m2) and 1 patient with severe (eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2) renal impairment. There were no reported cases of NSF. Updated literature review including our results identified 340 patients with severe renal impairment or on dialysis with zero cases of NSF (0/340; 95% confidence intervals 0% and 0.9%). CONCLUSION: No cases of NSF were documented in this study related to gadoxetic acid use in oncology patients, including those with moderate and severe renal impairment. Recent data indicate use of gadoxetic acid in patients with renal impairment can be considered low-risk.

Use of Intravenous Gadolinium-based Contrast Media in Patients with Kidney Disease and the Risk of Nephrogenic Systemic Fibrosis: Radiology In Training.

A 66-year-old male patient with end-stage chronic kidney disease undergoing maintenance dialysis and with a history of group I intravenous gadolinium-based contrast media (GBCM) administration presented with clinical and pathologic findings consistent with nephrogenic systemic fibrosis. A summary of the evidence and recommendations for use of intravenous GBCM in patients with kidney disease is presented. © RSNA, 2021.

No Cases of Nephrogenic Systemic Fibrosis after Administration of Gadoxetic Acid.

Background Gadoxetic acid (GA) has distinctive pharmacokinetic properties with important applications in hepatobiliary imaging. However, there are limited data evaluating the safety of GA administration in patients with impaired kidney function and the incidence of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF). Purpose To evaluate safety of GA regarding risk of NSF in patients with impaired kidney function. Materials and Methods This retrospective study identified all GA-enhanced MRI (hereafter, GA MRI) examinations performed between July 2008 and December 2019 through a search of the electronic medical record. Serum creatinine values within 180 days or less of each GA MRI examination were retrieved and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated. The eGFR value nearest to each MRI examination was used. A separate search in the electronic medical record was also performed to identify patients with NSF. Dermatologists, nephrologists, and nephrologists at our institution were surveyed for any cases of NSF. In patients with NSF, all MRI examinations performed and contrast agents administered to these patients were recorded. Results Overall, 7820 GA MRI examinations were identified, performed in 5351 patients (3022 women and 2329 men). These included 299 examinations (242 patients) with eGFR of 30-44 mL/min/1.73 m2 and 183 examinations (157 patients) with eGFR less than 30 mL/min/1.73 m2. There were 109 examinations (in 94 patients) with eGFR of 15-29 mL/min/1.73 m2, 40 examinations (in 39 patients) with eGFR less than 15 mL/min/1.73 m2, and 34 examinations in 27 patients undergoing hemodialysis. Seventeen patients with eGFR less than 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 or undergoing dialysis underwent GA MRI two or more times. Eighteen patients with biopsy-confirmed NSF were identified, none of whom were exposed to GA. The mean follow-up period for GA MRI examinations performed in patients with severe kidney impairment was 4.2 years (range, 0.2-11.3 years). Conclusion Gadoxetic acid may be safe with respect to nephrogenic systemic fibrosis in this patient population, although further studies are needed to confirm this. © RSNA, 2020 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Davenport and Shankar in this issue.

Imágenes de resonancia magnética cardiaca sin contraste basadas en gadolinio para la evaluación de la anatomía del corazón: un estudio de viabilidad / Gadolinium based contrast agent-free cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for the assessment of heart anatomy. A feasibility study

No disponible

Adverse Events to the Gadolinium-based Contrast Agent Gadoxetic Acid: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background Gadoxetic acid is classified by the American College of Radiology as a group III gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA), which indicates that there are limited data regarding nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF) risk, but there are few if any unconfounded cases of NSF. Purpose To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of gadoxetic acid adverse events, including immediate hypersensitivity reactions, NSF, and intracranial gadolinium retention. Materials and Methods Original research studies, case series, and case reports that reported adverse events in patients undergoing gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI were searched in MEDLINE (1946-2019), Embase (1947-2019), CENTRAL (March 2019), and Scopus (1946-2019). The study protocol was registered at Prospero (number 162811). Risk of bias was evaluated by using Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2, or QUADAS-2. Meta-analysis of proportions was performed by using random-effects modeling. Upper bound of 95% confidence interval (CI) for risk of NSF was determined. Results Seventy-one studies underwent full-text review. From 17 studies reporting 14 850 administrations, hypersensitivity reactions occurred in 0.3% (31 of 14 850; 95% CI: 0.2%, 0.4%) with zero deaths. From four studies reporting 106 administrations in patients with stage 4 or 5 chronic kidney disease or undergoing dialysis, the upper bound 95% CI for the risk of NSF was 2.8%. Five studies evaluating intracranial retention of gadolinium after gadoxetic acid administration were at high risk of bias. Conclusion Gadoxetic acid had a similar safety profile to American College of Radiology group 2 gadolinium-based contrast agents for hypersensitivity reactions and nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF) but had lower confidence for risk of NSF because of fewer administrations in patients with severe kidney impairment. There is incomplete information documenting intracranial gadolinium retention in patients administered gadoxetic acid. © RSNA, 2020 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Gadolinium labelled nanoliposomes as the platform for MRI theranostics: in vitro safety study in liver cells and macrophages.

Gadolinium (Gd)-based contrast agents are extensively used for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Liposomes are potential nanocarrier-based biocompatible platforms for development of new generations of MRI diagnostics. Liposomes with Gd-complexes (Gd-lip) co-encapsulated with thrombolytic agents can serve both for imaging and treatment of various pathological states including stroke. In this study, we evaluated nanosafety of Gd-lip containing PE-DTPA chelating Gd+3 prepared by lipid film hydration method. We detected no cytotoxicity of Gd-lip in human liver cells including cancer HepG2, progenitor (non-differentiated) HepaRG, and differentiated HepaRG cells. Furthermore, no potential side effects of Gd-lip were found using a complex system including general biomarkers of toxicity, such as induction of early response genes, oxidative, heat shock and endoplasmic reticulum stress, DNA damage responses, induction of xenobiotic metabolizing enzymes, and changes in sphingolipid metabolism in differentiated HepaRG. Moreover, Gd-lip did not show pro-inflammatory effects, as assessed in an assay based on activation of inflammasome NLRP3 in a model of human macrophages, and release of eicosanoids from HepaRG cells. In conclusion, this in vitro study indicates potential in vivo safety of Gd-lip with respect to hepatotoxicity and immunopathology caused by inflammation.

Use of Eovist in Pediatric Patients: Pearls and Pitfalls.

Magnetic resonance imaging is excellent at characterizing pediatric hepatobiliary pathology. Noncontrast MRI is helpful due to T2 hyperintensity associated with bile, but contrast enhancement offers additional means of lesional characterization. In particular, hepatocyte-specific contrast agents such as gadoxetate disodium (Eovist) exhibit partial hepatobiliary excretion which may be leveraged in these contexts. In this review, we will discuss gadoxetate disodium usage, including a sample-imaging protocol, and demonstrate applications and limitations in the pediatric population.

Gadoxetate Disodium versus Gadoterate Meglumine: Quantitative Respiratory and Hemodynamic Metrics by Using Compressed-Sensing MRI.

Background Gadoxetate disodium has been associated with various respiratory irregularities at arterial imaging MRI. Purpose To measure the relationship between gadolinium-based contrast agent administration and irregularities by comparing gadoxetate disodium and gadoterate meglumine at free breathing. Materials and Methods This prospective observational cohort study (January 2015 to May 2017) included consecutive abdominal MRI performed with either gadoxetate disodium or gadoterate meglumine enhancement. Participants underwent dynamic imaging by using the golden-angle radial sparse parallel sequence at free breathing. The quantitative assessment evaluated the aortic contrast enhancement, the respiratory hepatic translation, and the k-space-derived respiratory pattern. Analyses of variance compared hemodynamic metrics, respiratory-induced hepatic motion, and respiratory parameters before and after respiratory gating. Results A total of 497 abdominal MRI examinations were included. Of these, 338 participants were administered gadoxetate disodium (mean age, 59 years ± 15; 153 women) and 159 participants were administered gadoterate meglumine (mean age, 59 years ± 17; 85 women). The arterial bolus of gadoxetate disodium arrived later than gadoterate meglumine (19.7 vs 16.3 seconds, respectively; P < .001). Evaluation of the hepatic respiratory translation showed respiratory motion occurring in 70.7% (239 of 338) of participants who underwent gadoxetate-enhanced examinations and in 28.9% (46 of 159) of participants who underwent gadoterate-enhanced examinations (P < .001). The duration of motion irregularities was longer for gadoxetate than for gadoterate (19.2 seconds vs 17.2 seconds, respectively) and the motion irregularities were more severe (P < .001). Both the respiratory frequency and amplitude were shorter for participants administered gadoxetate from the prebolus phase to the late arterial phase compared with gadoterate (P < .001). Conclusion The administration of two different gadolinium-based contrast agents, gadoxetate and gadoterate, at free-breathing conditions potentially leads to respiratory irregularities with differing intensity and onset. © RSNA, 2019 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Acute Adverse Events Following Gadolinium-based Contrast Agent Administration: A Single-Center Retrospective Study of 281 945 Injections.

Background Acute allergic-like and physiologic reactions occur following administration of gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) for MRI examinations. Because these reactions are uncommon, it is challenging to compare reaction rates between GBCAs and to determine risk factors. Purpose To compare reaction rates between the four GBCAs gadodiamide, gadobutrol, gadobenate dimeglumine, and gadoterate meglumine, and to determine potential risk factors for reactions. Materials and Methods This retrospective study identified all intravenous GBCA injections for MRI examinations performed at a single institution from June 1, 2009, to May 9, 2017. Reactions were identified by reviewing records from the MRI technologist, MRI nursing staff, radiologist, emergency department, and provider. Reactions were classified as allergic-like or physiologic and as mild, moderate, or severe by using American College of Radiology criteria. GBCA reaction rates and other potential risk factors were examined by using multivariable regression models with generalized estimating equations. Results Analysis included a total of 158 100 patients (median age, 55 years [interquartile range, 40-67 years], 51% women) who received a total of 281 945 GBCA injections (140 645 gadodiamide, 94 109 gadobutrol, 39 138 gadobenate, and 8053 gadoterate). At multivariate analysis, gadobenate or gadobutrol had higher rates of allergic-like reactions compared with gadodiamide (gadobenate: odds ratio [OR], 3.9 [95% confidence interval {CI}: 3.0, 5.1]; P < .001; gadobutrol: OR, 2.3 [95% CI: 1.8, 2.9]; P < .001) or gadoterate (gadobenate: OR, 4.8 [95% CI: 1.0, 23]; P = .049; gadobutrol: OR, 2.8 [95% CI: 0.6, 14]; P = .20). Physiologic reactions were more frequently observed with gadoterate (OR, 7.7 [95% CI: 2.3, 25; P = .001), gadobenate (OR, 1.8 [95% CI: 1.3, 2.5; P < .001), and gadobutrol (OR, 1.6 [95% CI: 1.3, 2.1; P < .001) administration compared with gadodiamide. Six severe allergic-like reactions (three gadobutrol, three gadobenate) occurred requiring hospitalization. Patient age (P values .025 to < .001), sex (P < .001), location (P = .006), and MRI type (P = .003 and P = .006) were associated with acute reactions. Conclusion Gadobenate and gadobutrol are associated with higher rates of allergic-like reactions compared with gadodiamide or gadoterate, and gadoterate, gadobenate, and gadobutrol are associated with higher rates of physiologic reactions compared with gadodiamide. Patient sex, age, location, and MRI type correlate with acute reaction rates. © RSNA, 2019 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

Hepatic computed tomography and cholangiography by use of gadoxetic acid in healthy cats.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate 3 doses of gadoxetic acid (Gd-EOB-DPTA) for hepatic CT and cholangiography in cats and to determine optimal timing for hepatobiliary image acquisition and evaluation of the contrast-enhanced hepatobiliary anatomy. ANIMALS: 6 healthy cats. PROCEDURES: Cats were anesthetized; sequential CT scans were performed 0, 5, 25, 45, 65, and 85 minutes after IV administration of Gd-EOB-DTPA at low (0.0125 mmol/kg), medium (0.1 mmol/kg), and high (0.3 mmol/kg) doses. Hepatobiliary enhancement for each dose was objectively assessed over time and by use of a subjective semiquantitative visual assessment score. RESULTS: No contrast-related adverse effects were detected. Each increase in dose of contrast medium resulted in a significant increase in HU across the hepatobiliary system. The liver had a significantly higher number of HU at 45 minutes, with homogenous enhancement at all doses of contrast medium. Contrast-enhanced cystic and bile duct HU were significantly higher and maximal at 65 minutes. Contrast-enhanced gallbladder HU did not plateau by 85 minutes. At a high dose of contrast medium, 12 of 60 (20%) biliary tract scores indicated no enhancement, 34 (57%) indicated poor enhancement, and 14 (23%) indicated moderate enhancement. No cat had excellent enhancement of the biliary tract at any dose. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced hepatic CT and cholangiography in cats were safely performed and provided good hepatic enhancement but poor to moderate enhancement of the biliary tract. This technique may be useful for assessing the liver parenchyma in cats, but its value for assessing the biliary tract is questionable.

Removal of a gadolinium based contrast agent by a novel sorbent hemoperfusion in a chronic kidney disease (CKD) rodent model.

Gadolinium based contrast agents (GBCAs) have been linked to toxicity in patients, regardless of having impaired or normal renal function. Currently, no therapy is considered highly effective for removing gadolinium (Gd) from the body. We propose a new strategy to reduce blood Gd content that facilitates whole body removal of Gd using a hemoperfusion system consisting of a cartridge of porous silica beads (Davisil®) functionalized with 1,2-hydroxypyridinone (1,2-HOPO). Herein, we report optimization of the hemoperfusion system using an ex vivo blood and an in vivo rat model of chronic kidney disease (CKD). In our ex vivo system, 1,2-HOPO-Davisil outperformed Gambro activated charcoal (AC), which is commonly used in clinical hemoperfusion of aqueous toxins, in terms of Gd capture capacity and rate. In the CKD rat model, the 1,2-HOPO-Davisil hemoperfusion system removed Gd by 3.4 times over the Gambro AC system. 1,2-HOPO-Davisil did not change complete blood counts and common blood biochemistry. Thus, this strategy has great potential for clinical translation to manage GBCAs after magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), before Gd can deposit in the body and cause long-term toxicity. Although gadodiamide was used as a proof of concept model for GBCAs in this study, 1,2-HOPO functionalized mesoporous silica could also capture dissociated Gd and other GBCAs.

Gadolinium Deposition in the Brain: Current Updates.

Gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) are commonly used for enhancement in MR imaging and have long been considered safe when administered at recommended doses. However, since the report that nephrogenic systemic fibrosis is linked to the use of GBCAs in subjects with severe renal diseases, accumulating evidence has suggested that GBCAs are not cleared entirely from our bodies; some GBCAs are deposited in our tissues, including the brain. GBCA deposition in the brain is mostly linked to the specific chelate structure of the GBCA: linear GBCAs were responsible for brain deposition in almost all reported studies. This review aimed to summarize the current knowledge about GBCA brain deposition and discuss its clinical implications.

Patients with a history of hypersensitivity reaction to iodinated contrast medium and given iodinated contrast during an interventional pain procedure.

In patients with a history of a hypersensitivity reaction to iodinated contrast medium, iodinated contrast medium is avoided, antihistamine and steroid premedication are given, or a gadolinium-based contrast agent is employed. Six patients with a history of a hypersensitivity reaction to iodinated contrast medium and who were not premedicated had an unintentional injection of iodinated contrast. None of the patients developed a moderate or severe reaction. All patients had gadopentetate dimeglumine in one of their injections; three had repeated injections of the gadopentetate. The lack of a significant reaction may be due to any or all of the following: questionable history of iodinated contrast reaction, low dose of iodinated contrast given, concomitant injection of (epidural) steroid, and slower absorption from epidural compared with intravenous injection. While it is reassuring to know that there is a low possibility of a moderate to severe reaction in these patients, every effort should be made to avoid this scenario, appropriate drugs and resuscitation equipment should be immediately available, and the patients should be observed adequately and followed for the possibility of late reactions. Recent publications have called for caution in the use of gadolinium-based contrast agents.

An Acute Adverse Reaction with ST Elevation Induced by Magnetic Resonance Contrast Media: Kounis Syndrome.

A 78-year-old man with mild coronary arteriosclerosis on coronary CT angiography underwent MRI of the prostate with the administration of Gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA) (gadopentetate dimeglumine). He developed acute coronary syndrome immediately after the intravenous injection of GBCA, and recovered after the administration of nitroglycerine, atropine sulfate, and hydrocortisone. He was discharged on the ninth day of hospitalization without recurrent chest symptoms. This is the second reported case of Kounis syndrome caused by GBCA. Kounis syndrome caused by MR contrast media is rare, but we should recognize that all contrast agents have the potential to cause Kounis syndrome.