Searching for in silico predicted metabolites and designer modifications of (cortico)steroids in urine by high-resolution liquid chromatography/time-of-flight mass spectrometry.

Glucocorticosteroids are a restricted class of substances and appear on the 'in-competition' prohibited list of the World Anti-Doping Agency (WADA). Analysis of glucocorticosteroids is complicated since they show significant phase 1 and 2 metabolism in the human body and are excreted into urine in concentrations in the microg/L range. Full scan, high-resolution time-of-flight mass spectrometry analysis generates information on all ionisable components in urine, including known and unknown metabolites of steroids and even designer modifications of anabolic steroids. However, evaluation of the data obtained can be difficult and time-consuming because of the need to differentiate between endogenous components and compounds of interest. MetaboLynx, a spectral and chromatographic search program, was modified for the determination of in silico predicted metabolites of glucocorticosteroids and designer modifications of anabolic steroids in human urine. Spiked urine samples were successfully screened for known components in a targeted approach and for unknown species in a non-targeted approach using data filtering to limit potential false-positives. A simplified combined approach of targeted and untargeted screening was used for the detection of metabolites and designer modifications of existing compounds. This approach proved successful and showed its strength in the detection of tetrahydrogestrinone (THG), a designer modification of gestrinone. THG was positively detected in a spiked urine sample and correctly identified as a twofold hydrogenation of gestrinone. The developed screening method can easily be adapted to specific needs and it is envisaged that a similar approach would be amendable to the discovery of metabolites or designer modifications of other compounds of interest.

Detection of anabolic steroid abuse using a yeast transactivation system.

The classical analytical method for detection of anabolic steroid abuse is gas chromatography followed by mass spectrometry (GC/MS). However, even molecules with a chemical structure typical for this class of substances, are sometimes not identified in routine screening by GC/MS when their precise chemical structure is still unknown. A supplementary approach to identify anabolic steroid abuse could be a structure-independent identification of anabolic steroids based on their biological activity. To test the suitability of such a system, we have analyzed the yeast androgen receptor (AR) reporter gene system to identify anabolic steroids in human urine samples. Analysis of different anabolic steroids dissolved in buffer demonstrated that the yeast reporter gene system is able to detect a variety of different anabolic steroids and their metabolites with high specificity, including the so-called 'designer steroid' tetrahydrogestrinone. In contrast, other non-androgenic steroids, like glucocordicoids, progestins, mineralocordicoids and estrogens had a low potency to stimulate transactivation. To test whether the system would also allow the detection of androgens in urine, experiments with spiked urine samples were performed. The androgen reporter gene in yeast responds very sensitive to 5alpha-dihydrotestosterone (DHT), even at high urine concentrations. To examine whether the test system would also be able to detect anabolic steroids in the urine of anabolic steroid abusers, anonymous urine samples previously characterized by GCMS were analyzed with the reporter gene assay. Even when the concentration of the anabolic metabolites was comparatively low in some positive samples it was possible to identify the majority of positive samples by their biological activity. In conclusion, our results demonstrate that the yeast reporter gene system detects anabolic steroids and corresponding metabolites with high sensitivity even in urine of anabolic steroid abusing athletes. Therefore we believe that this system can be developed towards a powerful (pre) screening tool for the established doping tests. The system is easy to handle, robust, cost-efficient and needs no high-tech equipment. But most importantly, a biological test system does not require knowledge of the chemical structure of androgenic substances and therefore suitable to detect previously unidentified substances, especially those of the class of so-called designer steroids.

Structure-activity relationships of synthetic progestins in a yeast-based in vitro androgen bioassay.

The recent identification of tetrahydrogestrinone (THG), a non-marketed designer androgen used for sports doping but previously undetectable by established mass spectrometry-based urine drug screens, and its production by a facile chemical modification of gestrinone has raised concerns about the risks of developing designer androgens from numerous marketed progestins. We therefore have used yeast-based in vitro androgen and progesterone bioassays to conduct a structure-activity study assessing the intrinsic androgenic potential of commercially available progestins and their derivatives, to identify those compounds or structures with the highest risk of forming a basis for such misapplication. Progestins had a wide range of androgenic bioactivity that was not reliably predicted for individual steroids by their progestin bioactivity. 17alpha-Hydroxyprogesterone and 19-norprogesterone derivatives with their bulky 17beta-substituents were strong progestins but generally weak androgens. 17alpha-Ethynylated derivatives of testosterone, 19-nortestosterone and 18-methyl-19-nortestosterone such as gestrinone, ethisterone, norethisterone and norgestrel had the most significant intrinsic androgenicity of all the commercially marketed progestins. Facile chemical modification of the 17alpha-ethynyl group of each of these progestins produces 17alpha-methyl, ethyl and allyl derivatives, including THG and norbolethone, which further enhanced androgenic bioactivity. Thus by using the rapid and sensitive yeast bioassay we have screened a comprehensive set of progestins and associated structures and identified the ethynylated testosterone, 19-nortestosterone and 18-methyl-19-nortestosterone derivatives as possessing the highest risk for abuse and potential for conversion to still more potent androgens. By contrast, modern progestins such as progesterone, 17alpha-hydroxyprogesterone and 19-norprogesterone derivatives had minimal androgenic bioactivity and pose low risk.

Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) is an anabolic steroid like dihydrotestosterone (DHT), the most potent natural androgen, and tetrahydrogestrinone (THG).

We have recently taken advantage of the unique power of DNA microarrays to compare the genomic expression profile of tetrahydrogestrinone (THG) with that of dihydrotestosterone (DHT), the most potent natural androgen, thus clearly demonstrating that THG is an anabolic steroid. In 2004, the U.S. Controlled Substances Act has been modified to include androstenedione (4-dione) as an anabolic steroid. However, despite the common knowledge that dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) is the precursor of testosterone, DHEA has been excluded from the list of anabolic steroids. We thus used the same DNA microarray technology to analyze the expression profile of practically all the 30,000 genes of the mouse genome modulated by DHEA and DHT in classical androgen-sensitive tissues. Daily subcutaneous injections of DHT (0.1mg) or DHEA (3mg) for 1 month in gonadectomized C57BL6/129 SV mice increased ventral prostate, dorsal prostate, seminal vesicle and preputial gland weight (p<0.01 for all tissues). As early as 24h after single injection of the two steroids, 878, 2681 and 14 probe sets were commonly stimulated or inhibited (p<0.01, change> or =30%), in the prostate (ventral+dorsal), seminal vesicles and preputial glands, respectively, compared to tissues from gonadectomized control animals. After 7 days of daily treatment with DHEA and DHT, 629, 919 and 562 probe sets were commonly modulated in the same tissues while after 27 days of treatment, 1195, 5127 and 2883 probe sets were modulated, respectively. In analogy with the data obtained with THG, the present microarray data provide an extremely precise and unquestionable genomic signature and proof of the androgenic/anabolic activity of DHEA. Such data add to the literature showing that DHEA is transformed into androgens in the human peripheral tissues as well as in laboratory animal species, including the monkey, thus exerting potent androgenic/anabolic activity. The present microarray approach to identify anabolic compounds is applicable to all potential androgenic/anabolic compounds.

Comparison of crystal structures of human androgen receptor ligand-binding domain complexed with various agonists reveals molecular determinants responsible for binding affinity.

Androgens exert their effects by binding to the highly specific androgen receptor (AR). In addition to natural potent androgens, AR binds a variety of synthetic agonist or antagonist molecules with different affinities. To identify molecular determinants responsible for this selectivity, we have determined the crystal structure of the human androgen receptor ligand-binding domain (hARLBD) in complex with two natural androgens, testosterone (Testo) and dihydrotestosterone (DHT), and with an androgenic steroid used in sport doping, tetrahydrogestrinone (THG), at 1.64, 1.90, and 1.75 A resolution, respectively. Comparison of these structures first highlights the flexibility of several residues buried in the ligand-binding pocket that can accommodate a variety of ligand structures. As expected, the ligand structure itself (dimension, presence, and position of unsaturated bonds that influence the geometry of the steroidal nucleus or the electronic properties of the neighboring atoms, etc.) determines the number of interactions it can make with the hARLBD. Indeed, THG--which possesses the highest affinity--establishes more van der Waals contacts with the receptor than the other steroids, whereas the geometry of the atoms forming electrostatic interactions at both extremities of the steroid nucleus seems mainly responsible for the higher affinity measured experimentally for DHT over Testo. Moreover, estimation of the ligand-receptor interaction energy through modeling confirms that even minor modifications in ligand structure have a great impact on the strength of these interactions. Our crystallographic data combined with those obtained by modeling will be helpful in the design of novel molecules with stronger affinity for the AR.

Tetrahydrogestrinone induces a genomic signature typical of a potent anabolic steroid.

Tetrahydrogestrinone (THG) is a recently identified compound having the greatest impact in the world of sports. In order to obtain a highly accurate and sensitive assessment of the potential anabolic/androgenic activity of THG, we have used microarrays to identify its effect on the expression of practically all the 30,000 genes in the mouse genome and compared it with the effect of dihydrotestosterone (DHT), the most potent natural androgen. Quite remarkably, we found that 671 of the genes modulated by THG in the mouse muscle levator ani are modulated in a similar fashion by DHT, while in the gastrocnemius muscle and prostate, 95 and 939 genes respectively, are modulated in common by the two steroids. On the other hand, THG is more potent than DHT in binding to the androgen receptor, while, under in vivo conditions, THG possesses 20% of the potency of DHT in stimulating prostate, seminal vesicle and levator ani muscle weight in the mouse. The present microarray data provide an extremely precise and unquestionable signature of the androgenic/anabolic activity of THG, an approach which should apply to the analysis of the activity of any anabolic steroid.

Gestrinone (R2323) binding to steroid receptors in human uterine endometrial cytosol.

To understand the mechanism of biological action of gestrinone (R2323), which has a therapeutic effect against endometriosis, the binding of gestrinone to numerous classes of intracellular steroid binding proteins was studied in the human uterine endometrium. Gestrinone bound to endometrial receptors for estrogen, progesterone and androgen, but seemed not to bind to endometrial intracellular corticosteroid-binding globulin and sex hormone-binding globulin. Gestrinone occupies all specific binding sites of steroids in the steroid target cells despite the presence of endogenous steroids. It is speculated that the binding behavior of gestrinone may be related to its therapeutic effect on endometriosis. Gestrinone's more avid affinity for estrogen receptor may be the reason for the ability to use a lower clinical dose of gestrinone.

Progesterone-binding properties of the microsomal fraction from chick oviduct.

Progesterone binds to specific high-affinity and limited-capacity binding sites of chick-oviduct microsomes of estrogen-primed chicks. The dissociation constant is 2 x 10(-9) M (range 1.6--3.0) and the number of binding sites 500 femtomoles/mg microsomal protein (range 464--551). Treatment of the estrogen-primed chicks by progesterone had no apparent effect on the progesterone-binding capacity or affinity. Competition studies showed that testosterone, R-5020, Org-2058, D-norgestrel, 5 alpha-dihydrotestosterone and R-2323 were effective competitors of progesterone, in that order, whereas cortisol, estradiol and estrone exhibited only minimal displacement. No displacement of microsome-bound [3H]progesterone was found with fenoterol or prostaglandin F2 alpha. No high-affinity progesterone-binding sites were found in the microsomal fractions of liver, muscle, intestine or brain. On the basis of steroid-binding affinity and steroid-specificity determinations, the microsomal progesterone-binding components seem to be different from the progesterone receptor previously described in chick oviduct cytosol.