Laboratory diagnosis of Clostridioides difficile infection in symptomatic patients: what can we do better?

The laboratory diagnosis of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is challenging since this bacteria may be detected in healthy people and toxin production detection is not sensitive enough to be used alone. Thus, there is no single test with adequate sensitivity and specificity to be used in laboratory diagnosis. We evaluated the performance of tests used in the diagnosis of CDI in symptomatic patients with risk factors in hospitals in southern Brazil. Enzyme immunoassays (EIA) for glutamate dehydrogenase antigen (GDH) and toxins A/B, real-time polymerase chain reaction (qPCR), GeneXpert system, and a two-step algorithm comprising GDH/TOXIN EIA performed simultaneously followed by GeneXpert for outliers were evaluated. Toxigenic strain in stool culture was considered CDI positive (gold standard). Among 400 samples tested, 54 (13.5%) were positive for CDI and 346 (86.5%) were negative. The diagnosis of the two-step algorithm and qPCR had an excellent performance with an accuracy of 94.5% and 94.2%, respectively. The Youden index showed that GeneXpert as a single test (83.5%) and the two-step algorithm (82.8%) were the most effective assays. Diagnosing CDI and non-CDI diarrhea could be successfully attained by the combination of clinical data with accuracy of laboratory tests.

Hyperinsulinism-hyperammonemia syndrome in two Peruvian children with refractory epilepsy.

OBJECTIVES: Congenital hyperinsulinism (HI) is a heterogeneous clinical disorder with great variability in its clinical phenotype, and to date, pathogenic variants in 23 genes have been recognized.  Hyperinsulinism-hyperammonemia syndrome (HI/HA) is the second most frequent cause of this disease that shows an autosomal dominant pattern and is caused by an activating mutation of the GLUD1 gene, which responds favorably to the use of diazoxide. HI/HA syndrome presents with fasting hypoglycemia; postprandial hypoglycemia, especially in those with a high protein content (leucine); and persistent mild hyperammonemia. Neurological abnormalities, in the form of epilepsy or neurodevelopmental delay, are observed in a high percentage of patients; therefore, timely diagnosis is crucial for proper management. CASE PRESENTATION: We report the clinical presentation of two Peruvian children that presented with epilepsy whose genetic analysis revealed a missense mutation in the GLUD1 gene, one within exon 11, at 22% mosaicism; and another within exon 7, as well as their response to diazoxide therapy. To the best of our knowledge, these are the first two cases of HI/HA syndrome reported in Peru. CONCLUSIONS: HI/HA syndrome went unnoticed, because hypoglycemia was missed and were considered partially controlled epilepsies. A failure to recognize hypoglycemic seizures will delay diagnosis and adequate treatment, so a proper investigation could avoid irreversible neurological damage.

Prevalence and Seasonality of Clostridiodes difficile over 12 Years at a Tertiary Hospital in Brazil.

Clostridioides difficile is the main pathogen responsible for antibiotic-associated diarrhea in adults. Besides its challenging diagnosis, C. difficile infection (CDI) causes substantial morbidity and mortality. Commercially, there are assays with different targets and performances in sensitivity and specificity. The objectives of this study were to: (1) evaluate the prevalence and seasonal variability of CDI rates at a tertiary hospital in southern Brazil over 12 years and (2) determine the impact of using a two-step algorithm test in the laboratory diagnosis. Between January 2007 and May 2019, fecal samples from 2275 patients were analyzed in a cross-sectional study. Four commercial tests were adopted for the diagnosis of CDI, the immunochromatographic test for toxin A from 2007 to 2010; the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay method for toxins A and B from 2011 to March 2017; and the rapid enzyme immunoassay (EIA) for GDH and toxins A and B, associated with a Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) for the toxin B gene from June 2017 to 2019. The annual prevalence was 8.7% from 2007 to March 2017, increasing between June 2017 and 2019 to 14.7% when the C. diff Quik Chek Complete + GeneXpert C. difficile (two-step algorithm) test was adopted. The number of samples (691) and percentage of CDI cases (10.5%) were higher in winter, but the difference has no statistical significance (P > 0.05). An accurate diagnosis and adequate knowledge of the local seasonality of CDI allow the effective implementation of prevention and control strategies for nosocomial CDI, in addition to effective treatment for patients.

Laboratory diagnosis of Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile infection in domestic animals: A short review.

Despite the known importance of Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile infection (CDI) in animals, there are no published guidelines for the diagnosis of CDI. The performance of the available commercial methods, all standardized for human stool samples, can vary according to the animal species. Thus, the aim of the present study was to review the literature on the detection of C. difficile in pigs, horses, and dogs. The detection of toxins A and B using enzyme immunoassays seems to have low performance in piglet and dog samples, while it shows high sensitivity for the diagnosis of CDI in foals. On the other hand, tests for the detection of glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) have a high sensitivity towards detection of C. difficile in animal samples, suggesting that it can be an adequate screening method. A few studies have evaluated real-time PCR or nucleic acid amplification tests in animal samples and, so far, these methods have also shown a low performance for the detection of C. difficile in animals. Although the intestinal lesions caused by CDI can vary among animal species, histopathology can be a useful auxiliary tool for postmortem diagnosis in animals.

Equine parvovirus-hepatitis is detected in South America, Brazil.

The equine parvovirus-hepatitis (EqPV-H), recently identified in association with serum hepatitis in horses (also known as Theiler's disease), has been so far described in horses from North America, Asia and Europe. There is no information regarding its circulation in South America. Our retrospective study (2013-2016) screened by EqPV-H nested-PCR a total of 96 Brazilian horses grouped according to previous status of infection: Known to be positive for one or more horse "hepatitis viruses" (equine hepacivirus, equine pegivirus-EPgV and Theiler's disease-associated virus) and known to be negative. Serum biochemical parameters (aspartate aminotransferase, gamma-glutamyl transferase and glutamate dehydrogenase) were evaluated in EqPV-H positive horses. Molecular characteristics of the isolates were analyzed by DNA sequencing and phylogenetic analysis. EqPV-H DNA was detected in 12.5% (12/96) of horses from 46.6% (7/15) of the farms evaluated. Similar results were obtained between coinfected group (12.3%, 7/57) and non-coinfected group (12.8%, 5/39). Coinfection with EPgV was the most frequent (5/7). Altered serum biochemical parameters suggested a subclinical hepatopathy in some animals (3/12), but the majority presented no clinical or laboratory signs of infection. Nucleotide identity was higher than 94% in comparison with previous isolates. In conclusion, we demonstrated, for the first time in South America, the circulation of EqPV-H. The Brazilian isolates presented a low genetic variability, thus corroborating previous evidence.

Molecular characterization of Giardia lamblia and risk factors for giardiasis among immunocompromised patients in southern Brazil / Caracterização molecular de Giardia lamblia e fatores de risco para giardíase em pacientes imunocomprometidos no sul do Brasil

Acute Giardia infections often cause diarrhea and stomach upset. Chronic infections can lead to malnutrition, micronutrient deficiencies, malabsorption and weight loss. This study assessed the prevalence of G. lambia infection and assessed associated risk factors among immunocompomised patients undergoing chemotherapeutic treatment in southern Brazil. A total of 110 immunocompromised patients in Pelotas, RS, Brazil, consented to participate in this study and were recruited. Socioeconomic and epidemiological profile of patients was collected by questionnaire. The prevalence for Giardia were determined through microscopy by the centrifugation-flotation technique using stool samples of every patient. In addition, the genetic characterization of the parasite was carried out by amplifying and sequencing the glutamate dehydrogenase (gdh) gene. By microscopy, the prevalence of giardiasis was 17.3% (19/110). Furthermore, the DNA sequences revealed that 7 (36.8%) out of 19 isolates belonged to assemblage B, while 6 of them (31.6%) belonged to assemblage C, 5 (26.3%) to assemblage A and 1 (5.3%) to assemblage D. Risk factors (p ≤ 0.05) for giardiasis were schooling level (OR=8.0 (1.02 ­ 62.91) sharing a house with more than three people (OR=14.1 (3.77 ­ 52.51), water sources (OR=38.9 (10.4 ­ 145.7), sewage treatment (OR=14.2 (3.1 ­ 65.5), waste destination (OR=7.44 (2.0 ­ 27.3), owning pets (OR=4.6 (1.0 ­ 21.2) and cultivating a vegetable garden (OR=4.2 (1.3 ­ 13.6). The prevalence of G. lamblia in immunocompromised patients was considered elevate with the identification of four assemblage of the parasite (A, B, C and D).

As infecções agudas por Giardia geralmente causam diarreia e dores de estômago. As infecções crônicas podem levar à desnutrição, deficiências de micronutrientes, má absorção e perda de peso. Este estudo avaliou a prevalência da infecção por G. lambia e os fatores de risco associados em pacientes imunocomprometidos em tratamento quimioterápico no sul do Brasil. Um total de 110 pacientes imunocomprometidos de Pelotas, RS, Brasil, consentiram em participar deste estudo e foram recrutados. O perfil socioeconômico e epidemiológico dos pacientes foi coletado por meio de questionário. A prevalência de Giardia foi determinada através de microscopia pela técnica de centrifugação-flutuação utilizando amostras de fezes de cada paciente. Além disso, a caracterização genética do parasita foi realizada pela amplificação e sequenciamento do gene da glutamato desidrogenase (gdh). À microscopia, a prevalência de giardíase foi de 17,3% (19/110). Além disso, as sequências de DNA revelaram que 7 (36,8%) dos 19 isolados pertenciam ao agrupamento B, enquanto 6 deles (31,6%) pertenciam ao agrupamento C, 5 (26,3%) ao agrupamento A e 1 (5,3%) ao agrupamento D. Os fatores de risco (p ≤ 0,05) para giardíase foram, escolaridade (OR=8,0 (1,02 ­ 62,91), dividir casa com mais de três pessoas (OR=14,1 (3,77 ­ 52,51), fontes de água (OR=38,9 (10,4 ­ 145,7), tratamento de esgoto (OR=14,2 (3,1 ­ 65,5), destinação do lixo (OR=7,44 (2,0 ­ 27,3), possuir animais de estimação (OR=4,6 (1,0 ­ 21,2) e cultivar horta (OR=4,2 (1,3 ­ 13.6). A prevalência de G. lamblia em pacientes imunocomprometidos foi considerada elevada com a identificação de quatro conjuntos do parasito (A, B, C e D).

Evaluation of an immunochromatographic test for the detection of glutamate dehydrogenase for the diagnosis of Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile infection in dogs.

This study aimed to evaluate an immunochromatographic test used to detect glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) for the diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) in dogs. Fecal samples of 119 diarrheic dogs were subjected to toxigenic culture as the "gold standard" method and to GDH detection (Ecodiagnostica, Brazil). Samples positive for toxigenic C. difficile strains and those positive in the GDH test were also subjected to A/B toxin detection using an enzyme immunoassay kit (C. difficile Tox A/B II, Techlab Inc., USA). Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values (PPV and NPV, respectively) were measured for GDH detection and compared with the toxigenic culture results. A total of 19 (15.9%) dogs were positive for toxigenic C. difficile. Of these, 10 (52.6%) dogs were positive for A/B toxins using the enzyme immunoassay kit and 18 (15.2%) were positive in the GDH test, leading to a sensitivity and NPV of 89.4% and 97.9%, respectively. Three animals, two of which were colonized with non-toxigenic strains, were positive for GDH, though not confirmed with CDI, resulting in a high specificity (97%) and PPV (85%). The results suggest that the lateral flow test for GDH detection could be a useful method for diagnosing CDI in dogs, similar to that previously described for humans and other animal species.

Is Clostridioides difficile toxins detection necessary when the glutamate dehydrogenase enzyme is detected?

INTRODUCTION: Clostridioides difficile causes diarrhea and pseudomembranous colitis. Its diagnosis is made with glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) or toxins A and B detection and is confirmed with nucleic acid amplification tests. OBJECTIVE: To define if GDH determination is redundant to that of toxins. METHODS: Retrospective, observational study in diarrheal stools of patients with suspected Clostridioides difficile infection. Toxins and GDH were determined by immunochromatography. Bayesian simulation was performed with likelihood ratios; a p-value < 0.05 was regarded as significant. RESULTS: 329 GDH and toxin A and B results were analyzed. Clostridioides difficile infection prevalence was 18.2 %. Sensitivity and specificity of the GDH test were 0.90 and 0.89, respectively. Positive likelihood ratio was 8.9, and negative was 0.11. CONCLUSIONS: A negative GDH result considerably reduces the probability of infection but does not rule it out. Clostridioides difficile toxins detection may be necessary in institutions where nucleic acid amplification is not affordable or accessible.

INTRODUCCIÓN: Clostridioides difficile causa diarrea y colitis pseudomembranosa. Su diagnóstico se realiza con la detección de glutamato-deshidrogenasa (GDH) o las toxinas A y B y se confirma con pruebas de amplificación de ácidos nucleicos. OBJETIVO: Definir si la determinación de GDH es redundante a la de las toxinas. MÉTODOS: Estudio observacional retrospectivo de muestras fecales de pacientes con sospecha de infección por Clostridioides difficile. Las toxinas y GDH se determinaron mediante inmunocromatografía. Se realizó una simulación bayesiana con los cocientes de probabilidad; se consideró significativo un valor de p < 0.05. RESULTADOS: Se analizaron 329 resultados de GDH y toxinas A y B. Se encontró una prevalencia de infección de Clostridioides difficile de 18.2 %. La sensibilidad y especificidad de la prueba de GDH fue de 0.90 y 0.89, respectivamente. El cociente de probabilidad positivo fue de 8.9 y el negativo, de 0.11. CONCLUSIONES: Un resultado negativo de GDH disminuye considerablemente la probabilidad de infección, pero no la descarta. La detección de toxinas de Clostridioides difficile puede ser necesaria en instituciones donde la amplificación de ácidos nucleicos no es económica o accesible.

A cost of illness comparison for toxigenic Clostridioides difficile diagnosis algorithms in developing countries.

BACKGROUND: Availability of several commercial tests with different Clostridioides difficile targets contributes to uncertainty and controversies around the optimal diagnostic algorithm. While numerous studies have estimated the financial impact of C. difficile infection, models to guide testing strategies decisions in developing countries, where economic value significantly impacts clinical practice, are currently not available. AIM: To determine the cost of illness of different C. difficile infection (CDI) diagnostic strategies in developing countries. METHODS: Cost-comparison analysis was performed to compare eleven different algorithms of CDI diagnosis. The basis of calculation was a hypothetical cohort of 1000 adult inpatients suspected of CDI. We analyzed turnaround time of test results (i.e., time from taking sample to results emission), test performance (i.e., sensitivity and specificity) and testing costs. Patients were divided in true positive, false positive, true negative and false negative in order to integrate test performance and economics effects. Additional medical costs were calculated: costs of hygiene, medication, length of stay and intensive care unit costs, based on a Brazilian University Hospital costs. CDI prevalence was considered 22.64%. FINDINGS: From laboratory-assisted tests, simultaneous glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) and toxin A/B rapid immunoassay arbitrated by nucleic acid amplification test (NAAT) presented the lowest cost of illness (450,038.70 USD), whereas standalone NAAT had the highest (523,709.55 USD). Empirical diagnosis only presented the highest overall cost (809,605.44 USD). CONCLUSION: The two-step algorithm with simultaneous GDH and toxin A/B rapid immunoassay arbitrated by NAAT seems to be the best strategy for CDI diagnosis in developing countries.

¿La detección de toxinas de Clostridioides difficile es necesaria cuando se detecta la enzima glutamato deshidrogenasa? / Is Clostridioides difficile toxins detection necessary when the glutamate dehydrogenase enzyme is detected?

Resumen Introducción: Clostridioides difficile causa diarrea y colitis pseudomembranosa. Su diagnóstico se realiza con la detección de glutamato-deshidrogenasa (GDH) o las toxinas A y B y se confirma con pruebas de amplificación de ácidos nucleicos. Objetivo: Definir si la determinación de GDH es redundante a la de las toxinas. Métodos: Estudio observacional retrospectivo de muestras fecales de pacientes con sospecha de infección por Clostridioides difficile. Las toxinas y GDH se determinaron mediante inmunocromatografía. Se realizó una simulación bayesiana con los cocientes de probabilidad; se consideró significativo un valor de p < 0.05. Resultados: Se analizaron 329 resultados de GDH y toxinas A y B. Se encontró una prevalencia de infección de Clostridioides difficile de 18.2 %. La sensibilidad y especificidad de la prueba de GDH fue de 0.90 y 0.89, respectivamente. El cociente de probabilidad positivo fue de 8.9 y el negativo, de 0.11. Conclusiones: Un resultado negativo de GDH disminuye considerablemente la probabilidad de infección, pero no la descarta. La detección de toxinas de Clostridioides difficile puede ser necesaria en instituciones donde la amplificación de ácidos nucleicos no es económica o accesible.

Abstract Introduction: Clostridioides difficile causes diarrhea and pseudomembranous colitis. Its diagnosis is made with glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) or toxins A and B detection and is confirmed with nucleic acid amplification tests. Objective: To define if GDH determination is redundant to that of toxins. Methods: Retrospective, observational study in diarrheal stools of patients with suspected Clostridioides difficile infection. Toxins and GDH were determined by immunochromatography. Bayesian simulation was performed with likelihood ratios; a p-value < 0.05 was regarded as significant. Results: 329 GDH and toxin A and B results were analyzed. Clostridioides difficile infection prevalence was 18.2 %. Sensitivity and specificity of the GDH test were 0.90 and 0.89, respectively. Positive likelihood ratio was 8.9, and negative was 0.11. Conclusions: A negative GDH result considerably reduces the probability of infection but does not rule it out. Clostridioides difficile toxins detection may be necessary in institutions where nucleic acid amplification is not affordable or accessible.

Clostridioides difficile laboratory diagnostic techniques: a comparative approach of rapid and molecular methods.

Clostridioides difficile infection is a public health problem because of it is easily spread; with harmful consequences, it is essential to reduce hospital costs and prevent its dissemination by having a precise diagnosis. The gold standard for its diagnosis is polymerase chain reaction (PCR); however, the technique is not available for all laboratories due to the high cost. New approaches using non-molecular tests to detect C. difficile and toxin A/B production has been proposed to improve cost benefits. The objective of this study is to compare molecular methods (PCR) and rapid methods (immunochromatographic test and enzymatic immunoassay). A series of tests comprising these diagnostic techniques was performed with 50 patients with a clinical diagnosis for Clostridioides difficile on GeneXpert® devices test; a calculation of the sensitivity was executed, followed by a comparison of the efficiency of all techniques. Greater sensitivity was observed in the PCR-based methods (BD MAX™ and BioFire FilmArray®) and the GDH-based assays (RIDASCREEN® and Alere Techlab®). The proposed algorithm represents minor monetary disadvantages but a significant temporal optimization of 10%. Future studies concerning both positive and negative results could be advantageous because of the possibility of calculating more method concordance indexes, such as the specificity and Kappa index, in addition to being able to indicate a monetary profit if the proposed algorithm was applied due to the nonproceeding PCR cases.

Estudo epidemiológico e caracterização de coorte de pacientes com infecção por Clostridioides difficile internados no Hospital das Clínicas da UFMG / Epidemiological study and characterization of a cohort of patients with Clostridioides difficile infection hospitalized at the Hospital das Clínicas of UFMG

Introdução: a infecção por Clostridioides difficile (ICD) é a principal causa bacteriana de diarreia infecciosa associada aos cuidados de saúde e é responsável por significativa morbimortalidade, assim como por custos elevados relacionados ao tratamento em todo o mundo. Na Europa e nos Estados Unidos a densidade de incidência varia entre 2,9 e 8,3 casos/10.000 pacientes-dia. Não existem dados precisos sobre a taxa de incidência na América Latina. Objetivos: obter a medida da densidade de incidência da ICD associada aos cuidados de saúde em hospital de alta complexidade e descrever o perfil desta coorte de pacientes. Métodos: foi realizada busca ativa diária de casos de diarreia durante o período de 3 meses, entre abril e julho de 2021. Os casos suspeitos foram submetidos ao teste rápido para pesquisa da glutamato desidrogenase (GDH) e das toxinas A e B de C. difficile. Nas amostras positivas apenas para o GDH, a confirmação diagnóstica foi feita por meio da cultura toxigênica. Resultados: foram identificados 104 pacientes com diarreia e o C. difficile toxigênico foi responsável por 21 casos. A densidade de incidência foi de 9,2 casos para cada 10.000 pacientes-dia. A mediana de idade dos pacientes com ICD foi de 63 (19-80) anos, 57,1% eram do sexo masculino e a média do Índice de Comorbidades de Charlson foi de 4,10 (±2,49). Dezessete pacientes (81%) fizeram uso de antibiótico (ATB) nos 3 meses que precederam a infecção e a média do número de ATB foi de 3,29 (±2,72). A ICD foi considerada grave em 11 pacientes (52,4%). Vancomicina foi opção inicial de tratamento em 14 pacientes (66,7%), e 11 pacientes (52,4%) apresentaram resposta até o quinto dia. Dois pacientes estavam no segundo episódio de ICD e um paciente apresentou recorrência após período de recrutamento. Ocorreram três óbitos, provavelmente não relacionados à ICD. Conclusão: a medida da densidade de incidência foi alta e aponta para a necessidade de medidas que visem melhor controle da infecção. A amostra de pacientes foi caracterizada como complexa, com múltiplas comorbidades, uso recente de vários ATB e mortalidade alta.

Introduction: Clostridioides difficile (ICD) infection is the leading bacterial cause of healthcare-associated infectious diarrhea and it is responsible for significant morbidity and mortality rates, as well as treatment-related costs worldwide. In Europe and the United States, the incidence density varies between 2.9 and 8.3 cases/10,000 patient-days. There is no precise data about the incidence rate in Latin America. Objectives: get the measure of the incidence density of healthcare-related ICD in a high-complexity hospital and to define the profile of this cohort of patients. Methods: daily active search for diarrhea cases was carried out during a 3-month period, between April and July 2021. Suspected cases were submitted to a rapid test for glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) and C. difficile toxins A and B. In samples positive only for GDH, diagnostic confirmation was made through toxigenic culture. Results: 104 patients with diarrhea were identified and toxigenic C. difficile was responsible for 21 cases. The incidence density was 9.2 cases for every 10,000 patient-days. The median age of patients with ICD was 63 (19-80) years, 57.1% were male and the mean Charlson Comorbidity Index was 4.10 (±2.49). Seventeen patients (81%) used antibiotics (ATB) in the 3 months preceding the infection and the mean number of ATB was 3.29 (±2.72). ICD was considered severe in 11 patients (52.4%). Vancomycin was the initial treatment option in 14 patients (66.7%) and 11 patients (52,4%) responded by the fifth day. Two patients were in the second episode of ICD and one patient had recurrence after the recruitment period. There were three deaths, probably unrelated to CDI. Conclusion: The measure of incidence density was high and points to the need for measures aimed at better infection control. The sample of patients was characterized as complex, with multiple comorbidities, recent use of multiple ATB and high mortality.

Prevalence of Clostridioides difficile associated diarrhea in hospitalized patients in five Brazilian centers: A multicenter, prospective study.

Epidemiological data on CD infection (CDI) in Latin American are scarce. CDI prevalence and strains characterization were prospectively evaluated in 5 Brazilian hospitals from different regions. Prevalence rates of CDI were 15%, ranging from 0 to 37%. ST42 was the most common Sequence Type and hypervirulent strains were not identified.

The Predominance of Giardia duodenalis AII sub-assemblage in young children from Salvador, Bahia, Brazil. / Predominio del subconjunto AII de Giardia duodenalis en niños pequeños de Salvador, Bahía, Brasil

INTRODUCTION: Giardia duodenalis is an intestinal protozoan with a high prevalence in children of developing countries. Molecular studies revealed a great genetic diversity of G. duodenalis, with assemblages A and B found mainly in humans. Despite its importance, the information on the molecular epidemiology of human giardiasis is still limited in Brazil. OBJECTIVE: To characterize G. duodenalis molecular isolates in children from Salvador, Bahia, Brazil. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Giardia duodenalis positive fecal samples were obtained from 71 children from two day care centers and 39 users of a clinical analysis laboratory. Samples were analyzed by PCR-RFLP of the glutamate dehydrogenase (gdh) and beta-giardin genes and by the sequencing of beta-giardin. RESULTS: Of the 110 G. duodenalis samples, 80 (72.7%) amplified one or both target genes. Of these, 62 (77.5 %) were identified as assemblage A and 18 (22.5%) as assemblage B. The subassemblage AII was identified in 58.8% (n=47) of isolates followed by the sub-assemblage AI (18.8%, n=15), BIV (11.2%, n=9), and BIII (5.0%, n=4). The AII sub-assemblage was the most frequent in children of both day care centers whereas AI was found only in the group attended at the clinical laboratory. Sub-assemblage AII predominated in children under two years. CONCLUSIONS: The higher frequency of AII sub-assemblage suggests that anthroponotic transmission is more common in Salvador, but that zoonotic transmission pathways are also present and a change in susceptibility to different molecular patterns of Giardia may occur during child growth.

Introducción. Giardia duodenalis es un protozoo intestinal de gran prevalencia en los niños de los países en desarrollo. En estudios moleculares se ha evidenciado la gran diversidad genética de G. duodenalis y se han identificado los conjuntos A y B, principalmente en humanos. A pesar de su importancia, el conocimiento de la epidemiología molecular de la giardiasis humana aún es limitado en Brasil. Objetivo. Caracterizar los aislamientos moleculares de G. duodenalis de muestras tomadas a niños de Salvador, Bahía, Brasil. Materiales y métodos. Las muestras fecales positivas para G. duodenalis se obtuvieron de 71 niños de dos guarderías y de 39 usuarios de un laboratorio de análisis clínicos. Las muestras se analizaron mediante PCR-RFLP de los genes gdh y beta-giardin, y secuenciación de beta-giardin. Resultados. De las 110 muestras de G. duodenalis, en 80 (72,7 %) se amplificaron uno o ambos genes. De estos, 62 (77,5 %) se identificaron como pertenecientes al conjunto A y 18 (22,5 %) al B. El subconjunto AII se identificó en el 58,8 % (n=47) de los aislamientos, seguido del AI en el 18,8% (n=15), el BIV en el 11,2% (n=9) y el BIII en el 5,0% (n=4). El subconjunto AII fue el más frecuente en los niños de ambas guarderías, en tanto que el AI solo se encontró en el grupo atendido en el laboratorio clínico. El subconjunto AII predominó en los niños menores de dos años. Conclusiones. La mayor frecuencia del subconjunto AII sugiere que la transmisión antroponótica es más común en Salvador, pero también existen vías de transmisión zoonóticas, y que pueden ocurrir cambios en la sensibilidad frente a diferentes patrones moleculares de Giardia durante el crecimiento infantil.

Evaluation of glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) and toxin A/B rapid tests for Clostridioides (prev. Clostridium) difficile diagnosis in a university hospital in Minas Gerais, Brazil.

Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile is responsible for most cases of nosocomial diarrhea and, despite the high prevalence of the disease worldwide, the best laboratory diagnostic approach to diagnose C. difficile infection (CDI) is a subject of ongoing debate. Although the use of multiple tests is recommended, the cost of these algorithms commonly exceeds the affordability in some countries. Thus, to improve CDI diagnosis in a university hospital in Brazil, this study analyzed two immunochromatographic tests and one enzyme immunoassay (ELISA) to evaluate the detection of glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) and A/B toxins of C. difficile. Stool samples of 89 adult patients presenting nosocomial diarrhea during hospitalization were included. The toxigenic culture was used as the reference method. GDH detection by both commercial tests showed high sensitivity (100%) and specificity (92.1%). On the other hand, toxin-based methods showed a sensitivity between 19.2 and 57.7%. In conclusion, the results suggest that rapid tests for GDH detection are not only suitable for CDI diagnosis as screening tests but also as a single method.

Immunochromatographic test and ELISA for the detection of glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) and A/B toxins as an alternative for the diagnosis of Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile-associated diarrhea in foals and neonatal piglets.

Considering the lack of studies evaluating the performance of commercially available methods for diagnosis of Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile infection (CDI) in animals, the present study aimed to assess an immunochromatographic test for detection of glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) and A/B toxins of C. difficile, also evaluated by an ELISA kit, in foals and neonatal piglets. Intestinal contents of 47 piglets and feces of 35 foals were tested to GDH antigen and A/B toxins in a lateral flow method (Ecodiagnostica, Brazil). Also, these samples were submitted to A/B toxin detection by an ELISA kit (C. difficile Tox A/B II, Techlab Inc., USA), using the toxigenic culture (TC) as the reference method. The GDH component of the lateral flow test showed sensitivity and negative predictive value (NPV) of 100% and a high specificity in samples of piglets (82.61%) and foals (100%). Detection of A/B toxins using the lateral flow test and the ELISA resulted in a specificity of 100% in samples of both species. On the other hand, the sensibility ranged from 54.2 to 90% for the ELISA and from 12.5 to 60% for the lateral flow test for piglets' and foals' samples, respectively. In conclusion, the present work suggests that the lateral flow test for GDH detection could be a useful method for diagnosing CDI in these species. On the other hand, the low sensitivity of the lateral flow test for A/B toxins might compromise its utility in piglets.

Concordance of Giardia duodenalis assemblages determined by different PCR methodologies in three observational studies in Cuba.

Giardia duodenalis is one of the most important intestinal parasites globally, especially in children, and in Cuba is the leading cause of chronic paediatric diarrhoea in this population. G. duodenalis is composed of eight genetic groups (or assemblages), two of which (A and B) are apparently zoonotic, occurring in both humans and other animals. However, consensus on the most appropriate genotyping scheme for optimal characterization of G. duodenalis isolates is lacking. In this article we present the results of three descriptive observational studies conducted in Havana, Cuba between 2010 and 2013, with the aim of comparing the results from molecular (PCR) approaches targeting different genes in order to assign with confidence 224 isolates of G. duodenalis to the correct assemblages. In each sub-study, following DNA isolation by the phenol/chloroform/isoamyl alcohol extraction method, PCR targeting the triose phosphate isomerase (tpi) gene was used for molecular characterization, as well as one additional PCR-method targeting another gene or pair of genes. DNA amplification was obtained in 87%, 83%, and 80% in the three sub-studies. Although excellent agreement (kappa index = 1) was recorded between results from some pairs of genes, for other combinations only moderate or substantial agreement was achieved. These results highlight the importance of interpretation of genotyping data, especially when single genetic markers are used. From the results of our studies, PCR targeting a combination of the tpi gene and the intergenic spacer region of rDNA may be a useful approach for the molecular characterization of G. duodenalis isolates.

Improvement in cyst recovery and molecular detection of Giardia duodenalis from stool samples.

Molecular detection of Giardia duodenalis by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is difficult in faecal samples due to inhibitors that contaminate DNA preparations, or due to low cyst concentrations. In order to eliminate inhibitors, improve cyst recovery and molecular detection of G. duodenalis, different types of water, distillates (MDs), deionized (MDz), injection (MI) or Milli-Q® (MM) were used instead of formaldehyde (F) in the laboratory routine method (Ritchie). Cysts were isolated from faecal samples with low cyst concentrations (< 1 cyst/field), medium (1-2 cysts/field) or high (> 2 cysts/field). Cyst recovery was improved using all water types (MDs, MDz, MI, MM) compared to formaldehyde. At all cyst concentrations, the use of MM consistently showed the greatest recovery of G. duodenalis cysts . DNA samples from recovered cysts were tested for the glutamate dehydrogenase (GDH) and ß-giardin (ßg) genes. The use of Milli-Q® water allowed to detect both genes in all cyst concentrations, including low. The method processed with the other types of water amplified these genes at high and medium cyst concentrations. GDH and ßg genes were not detected when the sample was processed with formaldehyde. These experimental results were confirmed in clinical samples. The results suggest that Milli-Q® water provides the highest cyst recovery from stool samples and, correspondingly, the highest sensitivity for detecting G. duodenalis by microscopy or PCR for GDH and ßg genes, even at low concentration of cysts.