Systematic evaluation of the efficacy of treatments for cesarean scar pregnancy.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: Cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) is a type of ectopic pregnancy associated with severe complications, including significant hemorrhage, the potential need for hysterectomy, and life-threatening risks. Currently, two classification methods exist for CSP: Vial (type Ia and IIa) and Chinese Expert's Consensus (type Ib, type IIb, and type IIIb). However, these methods have limitations in guiding the selection of appropriate treatment plans for CSP. The purpose of this study was to systematically evaluate the effectiveness of various treatments for CSP within our clinic. METHOD: Our study included 906 patients with CSP from January 2013 to December 2018. The chi-squared test and logistic analysis were used to compare the clinical characteristics. The median and interquartile range (IQR) was calculated. We also analyzed whether preoperative application of methotrexate (MTX) could improve surgical outcomes and the relevant characteristics of misdiagnosed CSP patients. RESULTS: There was a significant difference in gestational age, gestational sac diameter, gestational sac width, gestational sac area, remnant myometrial thickness, vaginal bleeding and preoperative hemoglobin levels (p < 0.001) but not in the incidence of residual tissue (p = 0.053). The other factors (intraoperative blood loss, hemoglobin decline, first hemoglobin after operation, total hospital stay, hospital stay after operation, transfusion and duration of catheter drain) were significantly different (p < 0.001). For type Ia and type Ib CSP, 39.3% and 40.2% of patients were treated with dilatation and curettage (D&E) under ultrasound, respectively. For type IIa and type IIIb CSP, 29.9% and 62.7% of patients were treated with laparotomy, respectively. There were no differences in surgical methods, residual tissue and reoperation between the MTX and non-MTX groups (p = 0.20), but liver damage, hospital stay and pain perception were more remarkable in the MTX group. It is noteworthy that 14% of the patients were misdiagnosed with an intrauterine pregnancy. The incidence of misdiagnosis in type IIa CSP patients was higher than that in type Ia CSP patients (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: For type I CSP patients, D&E under ultrasound or D&E under hysteroscopy should be recommended. For type IIIb CSP patients, operative resection should be used. It is currently difficult to choose the appropriate treatment methods for type IIa or type IIb CSP patients.

A 20 year experience in the management of non-tubal ectopic pregnancies in a tertiary hospital - a retrospective review.

BACKGROUND: Non-tubal ectopic pregnancies account for < 10% of all ectopic pregnancies. Due to its rarity and wide variation in clinical practice, there is no guideline or consensus for its management. We reported our 20-year experience in the management of non-tubal ectopic pregnancies in a tertiary hospital. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of all women admitted for non-tubal ectopic pregnancies from January 2003 to December 2022 in a tertiary hospital. Women with non-tubal ectopic pregnancies diagnosed by ultrasound or operation were included for analysis. RESULTS: Within the study period, 180 women were diagnosed to have non-tubal ectopic pregnancies at a mean gestation of 6.8 weeks. 16.7% (30/180) were conceived via assisted reproduction. Medical treatment was the first-line management option for 81 women, of which 75 (92.1%) women received intralesional methotrexate administered under transvaginal ultrasound guidance. The success rate of intralesional methotrexate ranges from 76.5% to 92.3%. Intralesional methotrexate was successful even in cases with a positive fetal pulsation or with high human chorionic gonadotrophin levels up to 252605U/L. Twenty seven women were managed expectantly and 40 underwent surgery. Nine (11.1%), two (6.1%), and one (2.3%) women required surgery due to massive or recurrent bleeding following medical, expectant, or surgical treatment. Hysterotomy and uterine artery embolization were necessary to control bleeding in one Caesarean scar and one cervical pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS: Intralesional methotrexate is more effective than systemic methotrexate and should be considered as first line medical treatment for non-tubal ectopic pregnancies. It has a high success rate in the management of unruptured non-tubal ectopic pregnancies even in the presence of fetal pulsations or high human chorionic gonadotrophin levels, but patients may require a prolonged period of monitoring. Close surveillance and readily available surgery were required due to the risk of heavy post-procedural intra-abdominal bleeding.

Dilatation and Curettage after Uterine Artery Embolization versus Methotrexate Injection for the Treatment of Cesarean Scar Pregnancy: A Single-Center Experience.

Background and Objectives: Cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) represents a type of ectopic pregnancy in which the embryo implants inside the scar of a previous cesarean section. This condition can lead to maternal morbidity and mortality. The best therapeutic approach in terms of clinical effectiveness and patient safety for CSP has not been described yet, although different therapeutic strategies are currently available. The purpose of the present study was to analyze the success rate of two different treatments in a single institution. Materials and Methods: A retrospective study was performed among patients diagnosed with CSP at the Gynecology and Obstetrics Department of the "Cannizzaro" Hospital in Catania (University of Enna-Italy) from January 2016 to December 2022. The diagnosis was made by 2D/3D transvaginal ultrasound, following Timor-Tritsch criteria. Two treatment strategies were performed: local and systemic methotrexate (MTX) injection and uterine artery embolization (UAE) with subsequent dilatation and curettage (D&C). All treated women underwent subsequent clinical and sonographic follow-up. Complete recovery was defined as the reduction of ß-HCG values until it was undetectable and the disappearance of the mass in the uterine scar on ultrasound. Results: Nineteen patients were included; nine were in the MTX group and ten were in the UAE + D&C group. No significant differences were found between the two groups in terms of clinical parameters. Treatment was successful in 4 of 10 (44%) patients in the MTX group and 10 of 10 (100%) in the UAE + D&C group (p = 0.01); the length of hospital stay was significantly shorter in the latter group (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: In our experience, administration of MTX is not recommended as the primary treatment or pre-treatment. Dilatation and curettage after uterine artery embolization are better than methotrexate injection for the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy in a single-institution series in terms of complete recovery and length of hospital stay.

Surgical evacuation combined with Shirodkar cervical suture and selective uterine artery embolization: A fertility preserving treatment for 10-15 weeks' live cesarean scar ectopic pregnancies.

INTRODUCTION: Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancies (CSEPs) are associated with significant maternal morbidity and termination is often recommended in the early first trimester. Management of more advanced cases is challenging due to higher risks of major intraoperative hemorrhage. Hysterectomy is currently the intervention of choice for advanced cases. This study aimed to investigate if advanced live CSEPs could be managed effectively conservatively using suction curettage and interventional radiology. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective single-center cohort study was performed. A total of 371 women diagnosed with CSEP were identified between January 2008 and January 2023. A total of 6% (22/371) women had an advanced live CSEP with crown-rump length (CRL) of ≥40 mm (≥10 weeks' gestation). Of these, 77% (17/22) opted for surgical intervention, whilst the remaining five continued their pregnancies. A preoperative ultrasound was performed in each patient. All women underwent suction curettage under ultrasound guidance and insertion of Shirodkar cervical suture as a primary hemostatic measure combined with uterine artery embolization (UAE) if required. The primary outcome was rate of blood transfusion. Secondary outcomes were estimated intraoperative blood loss, UAE, intensive care unit admission, reintervention, hysterectomy, hospitalization duration and rate of retained products of conception. Descriptive statistics were used to describe these variables. RESULTS: Median CRL of the 17 patients included was 54.1 mm (range: 40.0-85.7) and median gestational age based on CRL was 12 + 3 weeks (range: 10 + 6-15 + 0). On preoperative ultrasound scan placental lacunae were recorded in 76% (13/17) of patients and color Doppler score was ≥3 in 67% (10/15) of patients. At surgery, Shirodkar cervical suture was used in all cases. It was successful in achieving hemostasis by tamponade in 76% (13/17) of patients. In the remaining 24% (4/17) patients tamponade failed to achieve complete hemostasis and UAE was performed to stop persistent arterial bleeding into the uterine cavity. Median intraoperative blood loss was 800 mL (range: 250-2500) and 41% (7/17) women lost >1000 mL. 35% (6/17) needed blood transfusion. No women required hysterectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Surgical evacuation with Shirodkar cervical suture and selective UAE is an effective treatment for advanced live CSEPs.

Cornual Pregnancy: Results of a Single-Center Retrospective Experience and Systematic Review on Reproductive Outcomes.

Background and Objectives: Cornual pregnancies (CPs) are rare forms of ectopic pregnancy. When abortion does not occur, it can be a life-threatening condition for the mother and can also impair future fertility. We present our experience in the diagnosis and management of CPs. A systematic review was also conducted to investigate the reproductive outcomes after treatment. Materials and Methods: Between January 2010 and December 2022, we performed a retrospective, cross-sectional, single-center, and descriptive data collection and analysis (ClinicalTrial ID: NCT06165770). The search for suitable articles published in English was carried out using the following databases (PROSPERO ID: CRD42023484909): MEDLINE, EMBASE, Global Health, The Cochrane Library (Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Cochrane Methodology Register), Health Technology Assessment Database, Web of Science, and search register such as ClinicalTrial. Only studies describing the impact of CP treatment on fertility were selected. Results: Two studies were included in the systematic review. Seventeen patients suffering from CPs were selected. In our series, a pelvic ultrasound allowed for the diagnosis of a cornual localization in 35.30% of cases. Thirteen women (76.47%) underwent immediate surgical management. The laparoscopic approach was the most used (76.92%), with a laparotomic conversion rate of 30%. Four patients (23.52%) received medical treatment with methotrexate. After treatment, two patients managed to achieve pregnancy. Conclusions: CP is a rare form of ectopic pregnancy that can quickly become life-threatening for the mother. Ultrasound does not lead to a precise diagnosis in all cases. In the absence of complications and emergencies, laparoscopy is an approach that could be considered valid. For selected asymptomatic patients, medical treatment may be a valid alternative. The data from the studies included in the systematic review, although demonstrating a superiority of medical treatment in terms of future pregnancies, are heterogeneous and do not allow us to reach a definitive conclusion.

Non-tubal ectopic pregnancy treatment experiences of a tertiary care center.

AIM: To evaluate the incidence, the risk factors, and the treatment outcomes of Non-tubal ectopic pregnancies (NTEP) treated in a tertiary care center. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 110 NTEP cases treated between 2014 and 2019 were included in the retrospective study. The study cohort was divided into 6 groups according to the pregnancy localization: 87 cesarean scar pregnancies (CSPs), 7 ovarian pregnancies, 6 interstitial pregnancies, 4 rudimentary horn pregnancies, 4 abdominal pregnancies, and 2 cervical pregnancies. One woman rejected all treatment modalities. Demographic characteristics, treatment modalities, and outcomes of each group were evaluated. RESULTS: In the study cohort, expectant management was performed in one (0.9%) woman. The methotrexate (MTX) treatment was administered in 29 (26.3%) women. Seventeen (15.4%) women underwent surgery, and 63 (57.2%) women underwent manual vacuum aspiration (MVA). A woman rejected all treatment modalities. Although 70.1% (n = 61) of CSPs were cured with MVA, 24.1% (n = 21) of them were treated with a single-dose MTX regimen in addition to MVA. The higher mean gestational sac size (33,9 ± 12,96 mm vs. 17,34 ± 9,87 mm), the higher mean gestational week (8,43 ± 1,16w vs. 6,66 ± 1,49w), the presence of fetal heartbeat (FHB) (90.5% vs. 26,2%) and the history of pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) (38.1% vs. 6,6%) were found in the CSPs with MVA treatment failure (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The management of NTEPs should be individualized according to the clinical and ultrasonographic findings. The size of the ectopic pregnancy mass, the gestational week, the presence of FHB, and the PID history were the predictive factors for the failure of MVA in CSP cases.

Predictive value of crossover sign for outcome of ultrasound-guided vacuum aspiration in women with Cesarean scar pregnancy.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the value of the crossover sign (COS) in predicting treatment outcome in women with a Cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) who were treated with ultrasound-guided vacuum aspiration. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of women with CSP who underwent ultrasound-guided vacuum aspiration. Based on the relationship between the gestational sac, Cesarean scar and anterior wall of the uterus, CSPs were classified by COS type. Analysis was conducted to investigate the association between COS type (COS-1, COS-2) and treatment outcome. The incidence of treatment failure, retained pregnancy tissue, secondary therapy and bleeding ≥ 200 mL were analyzed. RESULTS: In total, 181 eligible patients with CSP, including 90 (49.7%) women with COS-1 and 91 (50.3%) women with COS-2, were analyzed. COS-1 patients had a higher incidence of treatment failure compared with COS-2 patients (25.6% vs 8.8%; P = 0.003), as well as higher rates of retained pregnancy tissue (18.9% vs 6.6%; P = 0.013), secondary therapy (20.0% vs 6.6%; P = 0.002) and bleeding of ≥ 200 mL (13.3% vs 4.4%; P = 0.034). COS-1 and a large gestational sac (30.1-50.0 mm or >50.0 mm in diameter) were associated independently with increased risk of treatment failure (odds ratio, 4.57 (95% CI, 1.66-12.56); P = 0.003, 4.34 (95% CI, 1.35-13.94); P = 0.014 and 10.50 (95% CI, 2.54-43.46); P = 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound evaluation of the relationship between the gestational sac and the endometrial line (COS classification) in women with CSP may help to predict treatment outcome among those undergoing vacuum aspiration. Among COS-1 patients, especially those with a gestational sac diameter of >30.0 mm, vacuum aspiration may be discouraged. © 2023 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Successful conservative management of a large 12-week-old cervical ectopic pregnancy in a nulliparous woman: a case report.

Cervical ectopic pregnancy (CEP) accounts for less than 0.1% of all ectopic pregnancies. CEP is associated with high morbidity and mortality potential due to the associated life-threatening hemorrhage. When it is large, detected late, and occurs in a nulliparous woman, management is more challenging as it requires the need to preserve the uterus. We present a case of a 33-year-old nulliparous woman with a large live cervical ectopic pregnancy at 12 weeks + 1 day gestation and a very high serum ß-HCG of 126,750 Miu/ml. She was successfully managed with suction curettage and cervical encerclage tamponade in order to preserve the uterus. The treatment was associated with significant hemorrhage and a prolonged period of follow-up. In low-resource settings, uterine-conserving management of CEP can be challenging, and curettage with cervical encerclage tamponade can be a cost-effective treatment modality even though it is associated with significant haemorrhage and prolonged treatment period.

The use of pressure balloons in the treatment of first trimester cesarean scar pregnancy.

Cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) is among the most severe complications of cesarean delivery. CSP refers to the abnormal implantation of the gestational sac in the area of the prior cesarean delivery (CD), potentially leading to severe hemorrhage, uterine rupture, or development of placenta accreta spectrum disorders (PAS). The management of women with CSP has not been standardized yet. In women who opted for termination, discussion about the treatments should consider maternal symptoms, gestational age at intervention, and the future reproductive risk. A multitude of treatments, either medical or surgical, for CSP has been reported in the published literature. The present review aims to provide up-to-date information on a recently introduced minimally invasive treatments for CSP, including the single and double balloon catheter. The methodology of using the single or double catheter is described in a step-by-step fashion illustrated by pictures as well as video recordings. Both catheters have their deserved place to be used as a primary method for terminating scar pregnancies as well as using them as adjuncts to other treatments. They were successfully used by multiple individual practitioners and institutions due to their simplicity and low complication rates. The rare, but possible post-procedure complications such as recurrent CSP and enhanced myometrial vascularity are also mentioned.

The feasibility of introducing early pregnancy assessment unit in Nigerian hospitals: A pilot study from a private hospital in Enugu, Southeast Nigeria.

Background: Early pregnancy assessment unit (EPAU) is a dedicated unit that provides specialist care such as definitive ultrasonographic and biochemical assessment to women who have or have had vaginal bleeding or pain before 16 weeks of pregnancy. Such patients usually have a positive pregnancy test with a scan showing pregnancy of an unknown location, previous ectopic pregnancy, recurrent miscarriages, or previous molar pregnancy. Such a holistic and prompt approach leads to better outcome in the management of women with early pregnancy and other complications. Aim: This study aimed to describe the diagnosis and outcome of early pregnancy pain and bleeding, managed by rapid ultrasonographic and biochemical assessments by a dedicated gynecological team in a private hospital to determine the feasibility of establishing early pregnancy assessment units (EPAUs) in Nigeria. Materials and Methods: This is a cross-sectional study of eligible cases of early pregnancy bleeding and pain in a private gynecological hospital in Enugu, Nigeria. Results: During the 9-year study period, 160 women with early pregnancy pain or bleeding were analyzed. The mean age of the participants was 32.3 ± 7.2 years, and they were mostly multipara (68.7%) and Christians and of the Igbo tribe (91.3%). The final diagnosis after clinical and radiological evaluations showed that the majority had miscarriages (82.5%), while 17.5% had ectopic gestations. All the participants had their definitive diagnosis and treatment within 24 hours of presentation. There was no recorded case of maternal death. Conclusion: EPAUs are feasible in a Nigerian setting provided that trained, dedicated staff and equipment are provided.

Retroperitoneal ectopic pregnancy: successful expectant management in condition of early pregnancy failure.

BACKGROUND: Retroperitoneal ectopic pregnancy (REP) refers to abnormal implantation of the fertilized egg in the retroperitoneal cavity. REP can be divided into pelvic and abdominal positions. Extremely rare, the incidence of REP is less than 1% of ectopic pregnancy (EP). Herein, we report the first case of paraaortic-located REP in association with successful expectant management, thus raising awareness among healthcare providers, particularly in low-resource settings. CASE PRESENTATION: A reproductive-age woman presented at our tertiary referral hospital because of amenorrhea and a positive pregnancy test. Based on serial serum ß-hCG levels and imaging modalities including transabdominal ultrasound, transvaginal sonography, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), a REP of 7-9 weeks of gestational age adherent to abdominal paraaortic region was detected. Since the pregnancy was spontaneously arrested without clinical symptoms, expectant management was first indicated following careful evaluation. After a 1-month follow-up, the ectopic mass naturally degenerated without complications and her ß-hCG concentration returned to a negative value. Therefore, the patient recovered completely and avoided unnecessary surgery as well as toxicity of medical treatment when using systemic methotrexate. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to transvaginal and transabdominal ultrasound, MRI is necessary for the diagnosis of nonviable REP. Alongside the great vessels in the abdominal cavity should be taken into consideration in all suspected cases relating to this rare entity. Expectant management may be carefully indicated in conditions of nonviable REP and unruptured REP, where applicable.

Nontubal ectopic pregnancies: overview of diagnosis and treatment.

Nontubal ectopic pregnancies occur as a result of embryo implantation outside the uterine cavity and fallopian tubes. Sites include ovary, cervix, abdominal cavity, interstitial portion of fallopian tube, and cesarean scar. Nontubal pregnancies are uncommon. Nonspecific signs and symptoms of nontubal ectopic pregnancies make diagnosis challenging and, in many cases, significantly delayed, resulting in a high rate of morbidity. Although surgical management remains the mainstay of treatment, there is growing evidence that some of these can be managed medically or with the use of a combination of medical and surgical approaches with good outcome. This review summarizes the current diagnostic modalities, therapeutic options, and outcomes for nontubal ectopic pregnancies. Diagnostic and management options may be limited, especially in resource-restricted settings. Therefore, an understanding of the available options is critical. It needs to be emphasized that the rarity of cases and the difficulties in organizing ethically justified randomized trials result in the lack of well-established management guidelines for nontubal ectopic pregnancies.

An update and review of nontubal ectopic pregnancy management.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Nontubal ectopic pregnancies appear to be increasing in prevalence. Increasingly, minimally invasive methods for management are being utilized. A current literature review and recommendations for management of nontubal ectopic pregnancy is presented in this review. RECENT FINDINGS: Nontubal ectopic pregnancies are less common than tubal ectopic pregnancies but present a unique and significant threat to patient's health and are optimally managed by specialists familiar with the condition. Early diagnosis, prompt treatment and close follow-up to resolution are critical. Recent publications focus on fertility-sparing and conservative management through the use of medications both systemic and local; as well as minimally invasive surgical techniques. The Society of Maternal Fetal Medicine recommends against expectant management of cesarean scar pregnancies; however, optimal treatment is unknown and this holds true for management of other nontubal ectopic pregnancies. SUMMARY: Minimally invasive and fertility sparing management should be the mainstay in treatment of stable patients with nontubal ectopic pregnancy.

Reproductive outcome after cesarean scar pregnancy.

Cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) rate is rising worldwide, in parallel with the rising rates of cesarean delivery. Multiple therapeutic strategies and a timely diagnosis have led to a successful management in most cases, with many women preserving fertility after treatment. Despite this, still little is known regarding pregnancy outcomes after a CSP. The main adverse outcomes reported after CSP are recurrence of CSP, miscarriage, preterm birth, placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) disorders and uterine rupture. In addition, little is known about the influence of the different treatments on subsequent pregnancy outcomes after a CSP. Being aware of the impact of the different management strategies on the fertility outcomes is highly relevant to counsel pregnant women after a CSP. The aim of this manuscript is to provide an up-to-date review of the reproductive outcomes of women with a history of CSP and of the influence of various treatments on subsequent pregnancy outcomes.

Ectopic Pregnancy and Lifesaving Care.

This JAMA Insights Clinical Update discusses the management of ectopic pregnancy and the urgency of prompt intervention.

Scarred for life: a review of cesarean section scar pregnancy and potential pitfalls in diagnosis.

Cesarean section scar pregnancy (CSSP) is defined as abnormal implantation of a gestational sac on or in a previous cesarean section scar. There is an increasing incidence of detection of CSSP, likely in part due to the growing rates of cesarean deliveries and the improved rates of detection with advancing ultrasound technology. Diagnosis of CSSP is critical due to the potentially life-threatening complications to the mother if left untreated. Pelvic ultrasound is the imaging modality of choice in the initial evaluation of suspected CSSP, with MRI potentially useful if ultrasound findings are equivocal, or if confirmation is requested prior to definitive intervention. Early and accurate diagnosis of CSSP allows for prompt management to avoid severe complications and the potential to preserve the uterus and future fertility. A combination of medical and surgical treatment strategies may be needed with specific therapy tailored to each patient. Follow-up after treatment should include serial beta-hCG levels and possible repeat imaging if there is clinical concern for complications or treatment failure. This article will provide a comprehensive review of this uncommon but important phenomenon, detailing the pathophysiology and types of CSSP, imaging presentations, potential pitfalls in diagnosis, and management options.

Different management strategies for cesarean scar pregnancy: Short-term outcomes and reproductive prognosis.

PURPOSE: To investigate the impact on future reproductive potential of systemic methotrexate (MTX) administration, uterine artery embolization (UAE) and expectant management as treatments of caesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) and to assess their efficacy and safety. BASIC PROCEDURES: We retrospectively analysed patients with a diagnosis of CSP treated in a five years' period (2014-2018). Hospitalization, hCG normalization, menstrual cycle recovery, ultrasound restitutio ad integrum times, reproductive desire accomplishment after the resolution of the picture, and outcomes of subsequent pregnancies were considered. Only patients for whom complete diagnosis, treatment and follow-up data were available could be considered for study entry. MAIN FINDINGS: A total of 21 patients were included. Three of them were managed expectantly. In two cases spontaneous abortion occurred and one case underwent caesarean delivery at 35 weeks of gestation for complete placenta previa with hysterectomy for post partum haemorrhage. Seven patients were treated with systemic MTX. Median [IQR] times of hospitalization, hCG normalization, menstrual cycle recovery and ultrasound restitutio ad integrum were 21 days [10-26 days], 52 days [18-64 days], 8 weeks [6-10 weeks] and 8 weeks [6-11 weeks] respectively. At the end of follow up, 80% (95%CI [38-96%]) of patients with reproductive desire achieved at least one live birth. Eleven patients were treated with UAE combined with MTX. Median [IQR] times of hospitalization, hCG normalization, menstrual cycle recovery and ultrasound restitutio ad integrum were 14 days [12-20 days], 43 days [30-52 days], 8 weeks [4-12 weeks] and 8 weeks [8-10 weeks], respectively. Of those who expressed a reproductive desire after treatment, 80% (95%CI [49-94%]) achieved at least one live birth. In all included patients, the menstrual cycle was restored. PRINCIPAL CONCLUSIONS: Reproductive potential of women treated for CSP was preserved after both systemic MTX administration and systemic MTX combined with UAE. Both strategies proved to be safe.