Racial and ethnic disparities related to the Medicare Part D Medication Therapy Management Program.

Medicare's Part D Medication Therapy Management (MTM) programs serve approximately 4.5 million eligible beneficiaries. Prior research suggested that the thresholds to enter Part D MTM programs would disproportionately favor White beneficiaries compared with Black or Hispanic beneficiaries. This article summarizes those initial studies and compares the results with more recent analyses of racial and ethnic differences in MTM program enrollment, which, in general, show higher odds of MTM enrollment for minority beneficiaries compared with White beneficiaries. Disparities in the utilization of comprehensive medication review (CMR), a core MTM service, are also discussed. Although trends vary, disparities exist for various minority groups. For example, Black beneficiaries and Hispanic beneficiaries are less likely to be offered a CMR compared with White beneficiaries. Additionally, minority (Asian, Hispanic, and North American Native) beneficiaries are less likely to receive a CMR after being offered the service compared with White beneficiaries. Black, Hispanic, and Asian beneficiaries are more likely than White beneficiaries to have a longer duration between MTM enrollment and CMR offer. There is also a distinct difference in the type of pharmacist (ie, plan pharmacist, MTM vendor pharmacist, or community pharmacist) completing the CMR for certain racial and ethnic groups. For example, compared with White beneficiaries, Black beneficiaries were less likely to receive a CMR from a community pharmacist, whereas Asian beneficiaries were more likely.

The association between applicant gender and racial or ethnic identity and success in the admissions process at a Canadian medical school: a prospective cohort study.

Background: Canadian data suggests that Black candidates may be less successful than other groups when applying to medical school. We sought to comprehensively describe the racial and/or ethnic identity, gender identity, sexual orientation, and ability of applicants to a single Canadian medical school. We also examined for an association between success at each application stage and applicant gender and racial identity. Methods: Class of 2024 applicants to a single Canadian medical school were invited to complete a demographics survey. The odds of achieving each application stage (offered an interview, offered a position, and matriculating) were determined for each demographic group. Results: There were 595 participants (32.4% response rate). The demographics of the applicant pool and matriculating class were similar. There was no difference in interview offers or matriculation between BIPOC and white candidates. Cisgender men were overrepresented in interviews compared to cisgender women (OR 0.64; 95%CI 0.43-0.95; p = 0.03) but not in matriculation. BIPOC cisgender women received more interview invitations compared to other groups (OR 2.74, 95%CI 1.20-6.25; p = 0.02). Conclusions: Differences in applicant success for differing demographic groups were most pronounced being offered an interview.

Contexte: Des données canadiennes portent à croire que les candidats noirs peuvent avoir moins de succès que d'autres groupes lorsqu'ils postulent à une faculté de médecine. Nous avons cherché à décrire de manière exhaustive l'identité raciale et/ou ethnique, l'identité de genre, l'orientation sexuelle et les capacités des candidats à une seule faculté de médecine canadienne. Nous avons également cherché à établir un lien entre la réussite à chaque étape de la candidature et le sexe et l'identité raciale du candidat ou de la candidate. Méthodes: Les candidats de la promotion 2024 à une faculté de médecine canadienne ont été invités à répondre à une enquête démographique. Les chances d'atteindre chaque étape de la candidature (entrevue offerte, place offerte et inscription) ont été déterminées pour chaque groupe démographique. Résultats: Il y a eu 595 participants (taux de réponse de 32,4 %). Les caractéristiques démographiques des candidats à l'admission et des étudiants admis étaient similaires. Il n'y avait pas de différence entre les candidats blancs et les candidats autochtones, noirs et de couleur (PANDC) en ce qui concerne les offres d'entrevue ou les admissions. Les hommes cisgenres étaient surreprésentés dans les entrevues par rapport aux femmes cisgenres (OR 0,64; 95%CI 0,43-0,95 ; p=0,03) mais pas dans les admissions. Les femmes cisgenres appartenant au groupe des PANDC ont reçu plus d'offres d'entrevue que les autres groupes (OR 2,74, 95%CI 1,20-6,25 ; p=0,02). Conclusions: Les différences les plus marquées dans la réussite des candidats à l'admission parmi les différents groupes démographiques étaient quant aux offres d'entrevue.

Trends in prevalence of arthritis by race among adults in the United States, 2011-2018.

BACKGROUND: There is currently a lack of comprehensive prevalence information on arthritis and its various classifications among adults in the U.S., particularly given the notable absence of detailed data regarding the Asian population. We examined the trends in the prevalence of arthritis, including osteoarthritis (OA), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), and other types of arthritis, among U.S. adults by race between 2011 and 2018. METHODS: We analyzed data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), spanning from 2011 to 2018. Our study focused on a nationally representative sample of U.S. adults aged 20 and older. Participants who answered "y es" to the research question "Doctors ever said you had arthritis?" were classified as having arthritis. Further classification into specific diseases was based on responses to the question "Which type of arthritis was it?" with options including "OA or degenerative arthritis, " "RA, " "PsA, " or "Other. " RESULTS: We analyzed 22,566 participants from NHANES (2011-2018), averaging 44.8 years, including 10,927 males. The overall arthritis prevalence rose significantly from 22.98% (95% CI: 21.47-24.55%) in 2011-12 to 27.95% (95% CI: 26.20-29.76%) in 2017-18 (P for trend < 0.001). OA increased from 12.02% (95% CI: 10.82-13.35%) in 2011 to 14.93% (95% CI: 13.47-16.51%) in 2018 (P for trend < 0.001). RA and PsA remained stable (P for trend = 0.220 and 0.849, respectively), while other arthritis rose from 2.03% (95% CI: 1.54-2.67%) in 2011-12 to 3.14% (95% CI: 2.56-3.86%) in 2017-18 (P for trend = 0.001). In Whites, Asians, and other races , arthritis and RA prevalence increased significantly (P for trend < 0.05). OA and other arthritis rose in Whites and other races (P for trend < 0.05), but no significant change occurred in the black population. The prevalence of PsA remained stable across all racial groups, with no statistically significant changes. CONCLUSIONS: In this nationally representative U.S. adult survey spanning 2011 to 2018, we identified a rising prevalence trend in arthritis, OA, and other arthritis, with notable variations among different racial groups.

Gender, racial, ethnic, and Fitzpatrick skin type representation in Acanthosis nigricans clinical trials.

Acanthosis nigricans (AN) is characterized by dark, velvety patches and thin plaques primarily in the body folds. AN is more prevalent in skin of color populations, including Black/African American, Native American, and Hispanic patients. As the U.S. population becomes increasingly diverse, the need for inclusive dermatologic research becomes more pressing. Given the increased prevalence of AN in skin of color patients, there is a need to evaluate representation in AN clinical trials. This study aims to uncover gender, race, ethnicity, and Fitzpatrick skin type (FST) representation in AN clinical trials. A systematic literature search was performed across PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases to identify participant characteristics in clinical trials focused on AN treatment. Our review yielded 21 clinical trials, totaling 575 participants, with an identified predominance of female participants (69.0%) and a surprising absence of race or ethnicity data. Out of the 11 studies that included FST data, 1.2% of participants were type II, 20.6% were type III, 50.0% were type IV, and 28.2% were type V. None of the participants were FST I or VI. Herein, we highlight a predominate inclusion of female and FST III-V patients in AN clinical trials, the populations most impacted by this condition. We also highlight the need for improved race and ethnicity reporting and the importance of including all FSTs in clinical studies. Addressing this gap is critical for developing safe, efficacious, patient-centered, and equitable treatments for all AN patients. Future research should prioritize comprehensive inclusion of race, ethnicity, and the full spectrum of FSTs.

Race and Ethnicity Representation in Phase 2/3 Oncology Clinical Trial Publications: A Systematic Review.

Importance: The five 1997 Office of Management and Budget races in the US include American Indian or Alaska Native, Asian, Black or African American, Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander, and White, with Hispanic ethnicity. Despite the Affordable Care Act mandating Office of Management and Budget-based collecting and reporting standards, race and ethnicity publishing in medical journals is inconsistent, despite being necessary to achieve health equity. Objective: To quantify race and ethnicity reporting rates and calculate representation quotients (RQs) in published oncology clinical trials. Evidence Review: In this systematic review, PubMed and Embase were queried for phase 2/3 clinical trials of the 6 most common noncutaneous solid cancers, published between January 1, 2012, and December 31, 2022, in 4 high-impact journals. Trial characteristics were recorded. The RQs for each race and ethnicity were calculated by dividing the percent of representation in each clinical trial publication by the percent of year-matched, site-specific incident cancers in the US, compared with Kruskal-Wallis tests with Bonferroni correction (BC). Reporting was compared between journal publications and ClinicalTrials.gov. Findings: Among 1202 publications evaluated, 364 met inclusion criteria: 16 JAMA, 241 Journal of Clinical Oncology, 19 Lancet, and 88 New England Journal of Medicine. Publications included 268 209 patients (171 132 women [64%]), with a median of 356 (IQR, 131-800) patients per publication. Reported race and ethnicity included American Indian or Alaska Native in 52 (14%) publications, Asian in 196 (54%), Black or African American in 215 (59%), Hispanic in 67 (18%), Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander in 28 (8%), and White in 254 (70%). Median RQ varied across race (P < .001 BC), with 1.04 (IQR, 0.09-4.77) for Asian, 0.98 (IQR, 0.86-1.06) for White, 0.42 (IQR, 0.12-0.75) for Black or African American, and 0.00 (IQR, 0.00-0.00) for both American Indian or Alaska Native and Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander patients. Sensitivity analyses showed similar findings on subset analysis for US-only clinical trials. There was significantly less race and ethnicity reporting in the clinical trial publications compared with ClinicalTrials.gov documentation for American Indian or Alaska Native (14% vs 45%; P < .001 per McNemar χ2 test with continuity correction [MC]) and Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander (8% vs 43%; P < .001 MC). Conclusions and Relevance: While most phase 2/3 oncology clinical trials published in high-impact journals report race and ethnicity, most did not report American Indian or Alaska Native and Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander racial categories. Our findings support a call to action for consistent journal policies and transparent race and ethnicity reporting, in alignment with Affordable Care Act-concordant race and ethnicity federal reporting requirements.

Differences in Cardiovascular Health at the Intersection of Race, Ethnicity, and Sexual Identity.

Importance: An understanding of the intersectional effect of sexual identity, race, and ethnicity on disparities in cardiovascular health (CVH) has been limited. Objective: To evaluate differences in CVH at the intersection of race, ethnicity, and sexual identity using the American Heart Association's Life's Essential 8 measure. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study was conducted from July 27 to September 6, 2023, using National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data from 2007 to 2016. Participants were noninstitutionalized, nonpregnant adults (aged 18-59 years) without cardiovascular disease or stroke. Exposures: Self-reported sexual identity, categorized as heterosexual or sexual minority (SM; lesbian, gay, bisexual, or "something else"), and self-reported race and ethnicity, categorized as non-Hispanic Black (hereafter, Black), Hispanic, non-Hispanic White (hereafter, White), and other (Asian, multiracial, or any other race and ethnicity). Main Outcome and Measures: The primary outcome was overall CVH score, which is the unweighted mean of 8 CVH metrics, assessed from questionnaire, dietary, and physical examination data. Regression models stratified by sex, race, and ethnicity were developed for the overall CVH score and individual CVH metrics, adjusting for age, survey year, and socioeconomic status (SES) factors. Results: The sample included 12 180 adults (mean [SD] age, 39.6 [11.7] years; 6147 [50.5%] male, 2464 [20.2%] Black, 3288 [27.0%] Hispanic, 5122 [42.1%] White, and 1306 [10.7%] other race and ethnicity). After adjusting for age, survey year, and SES, Black (ß, -3.2; 95% CI, -5.8 to -0.6), Hispanic (ß, -5.9; 95% CI, -10.3 to -1.5), and White (ß, -3.3; 95% CI, -6.2 to -0.4) SM female adults had lower overall CVH scores compared with their heterosexual counterparts. There were no statistically significant differences for female adults of other race and ethnicity (ß, -2.8; 95% CI, -9.3 to 3.7) and for SM male adults of any race and ethnicity compared with their heterosexual counterparts (Black: ß, 2.2 [95% CI, -1.2 to 5.7]; Hispanic: ß, -0.9 [95% CI, -6.3 to 4.6]; White: ß, 1.5 [95% CI, -2.2 to 5.2]; other race and ethnicity: ß, -2.2 [95% CI, -8.2 to 3.8]). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study, CVH differed across race and ethnicity categories in SM females, suggesting that different communities within the larger SM population require tailored interventions to improve CVH. Longitudinal studies are needed to identify the causes of CVH disparities, particularly in Black and Hispanic SM females and inclusive of other racial and ethnic identities.

COVID-19 Hospitalization in Hawai'i and Patterns of Insurance Coverage, Race and Ethnicity, and Vaccination.

Importance: The people of Hawai'i have both high rates of health insurance and high levels of racial and ethnic diversity, but the degree to which insurance status and race and ethnicity contribute to health outcomes in COVID-19 remains unknown. Objective: To evaluate the associations of insurance coverage, race and ethnicity (using disaggregated race and ethnicity data), and vaccination with outcomes for COVID-19 hospitalization. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study included hospitalized patients at a tertiary care medical center between March 2020 and March 2022. All patients hospitalized for acute COVID-19, identified based on diagnosis code or positive results on polymerase chain reaction-based assay for SARS-CoV-2, were included in analysis. Data were analyzed from May 2022 to May 2023. Exposure: COVID-19 requiring hospitalization. Main Outcome and Measures: Electronic medical record data were collected for all patients. Associations among race and ethnicity, insurance coverage, receipt of at least 1 COVID-19 vaccine, intensive care unit (ICU) transfer, in-hospital mortality, and COVID-19 variant wave (pre-Delta vs Delta and Omicron) were assessed using adjusted multivariable logistic regression. Results: A total of 1176 patients (median [IQR] age of 58 [41-71] years; 630 [54%] male) were hospitalized with COVID-19, with a median (IQR) body mass index (BMI; calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared) of 30 (25-36) and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score of 1 (0-2). The sample included 16 American Indian or Alaska Native patients, 439 Asian (not otherwise specified) patients, 15 Black patients, 66 Chinese patients, 246 Filipino patients, 76 Hispanic patients, 107 Japanese patients, 10 Korean patients, 299 Native Hawaiian patients, 523 Pacific Islander (not otherwise specified) patients, 156 Samoan patients, 5 Vietnamese patients, and 311 White patients (patients were able to identify as >1 race or ethnicity). When adjusting for age, BMI, sex, medical comorbidities, and socioeconomic neighborhood status, there were no differences in either ICU transfer (eg, Medicare vs commercial insurance: odds ratio [OR], 0.84; 95% CI, 0.43-1.64) or in-hospital mortality (eg, Medicare vs commercial insurance: OR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.36-2.03) as a function of insurance type. Disaggregation of race and ethnicity revealed that Filipino patients were more likely to die in the hospital (OR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.04-3.03; P = .03). When considering variant waves, mortality among Filipino patients was highest during the pre-Delta time period (OR, 2.72; 95% CI, 1.02-7.14; P = .04), when mortality among Japanese patients was lowest (OR, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.03-0.78; P = .04); mortality among Native Hawaiian patients was lowest during the Delta and Omicron period (OR, 0.35; 95% CI, 0.13-0.79; P = .02). Patients with Medicare, compared with those with commercial insurance, were more likely to have received at least 1 COVID-19 vaccine (OR, 1.85; 95% CI, 1.07-3.21; P = .03), but all patients, regardless of insurance type, who received at least 1 COVID-19 vaccine had reduced ICU admission (OR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.21-0.70; P = .002) and in-hospital mortality (OR, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.21-0.79; P = .01). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of hospitalized patients with COVID-19, those with government-funded insurance coverage (Medicare or Medicaid) had similar outcomes compared with patients with commercial insurance, regardless of race or ethnicity. Disaggregation of race and ethnicity analysis revealed substantial outcome disparities and suggests opportunities for further study of the drivers underlying such disparities. Additionally, these findings illustrate that vaccination remains a critical tool to protect patients from COVID-19 mortality.

Assessing Glycosylated Hemoglobin Thresholds for Development of Cardiovascular Disease by Racial and Ethnic Groups.

BACKGROUND: Diabetes is the strongest risk factor for cardiovascular disease, and although glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) levels are known to vary by race, no racial and ethnic-specific diagnostic thresholds exist for diabetes in prediction of cardiovascular disease events. The purpose of this study is to determine whether HbA1c thresholds for predicting major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) differ among racial and ethnic groups. METHODS AND RESULTS: This is a retrospective cohort study of Kaiser Permanente Northern California adult members (n=309 636) with no history of cardiovascular disease who had HbA1c values and race and ethnicity data available between 2014 and 2019. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the odds of MACEs by the following racial and ethnic groups: Filipino, South Asian, East Asian, Black, White, and Hispanic. A Youden index was used to calculate HbA1c thresholds for MACE prediction by each racial and ethnic group, stratified by sex. Among studied racial and ethnic groups, South Asian race was associated with the greatest odds of MACEs (1.641 [95% CI, 1.456-1.843]; P<0.0001). HbA1c was a positive predictor for MACEs, with an odds ratio of 1.024 (95% CI, 1.022-1.025) for each 0.1% increment increase in HbA1c. HbA1c values varied between 6.0% and 7.6% in MACE prediction by race and ethnicity and sex. White individuals, South Asian individuals, East Asian women, and Black men had HbA1c thresholds for MACE prediction in the prediabetic range, between 6.0% and 6.2%. Black women, Hispanic men, and East Asian men had HbA1c thresholds of 6.2% to 6.6%, less than the typical threshold of 7.0% that is used as a treatment goal. CONCLUSIONS: Findings suggest that the use of race and ethnic- and sex-specific HbA1c thresholds may need to be considered in treatment goals and cardiovascular disease risk estimation.

Meta-analysis of residency program application and acceptance according to sex, race and ethnicity.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to investigate trends in residency program application and acceptance rates according to sex and race and ethnicity. METHODS: We collected data from the Journal of the American Medical Association Graduation Medical Education Reports. We extracted the data for 25 residency programs in the United States from 2005 to 2021 and conducted statistical analyses. RESULTS: Men were most matched for orthopedics (84.7%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 84.2%-85.1%), and women for oncology (78.7%, 95% CI 78.2%-79.2%). The most matched program was orthopedics for the White subgroup (43.5%, 95% CI 43.2%-43.9%), radiology for the Black subgroup (20%, 95% CI 18.9%-20.9%), general surgery for the Hispanic subgroup (11%, 95% CI 10.7%-11.2%), and internal medicine for the Asian subgroup (35.3%, 95% CI 34.9%-35.6%). CONCLUSION: Match rates for women were lower than those for men in all programs except psychiatry, pediatrics, obstetrics and gynecology, and dermatology. Match rates were significantly lower for Black, Hispanic, and Asian subgroups than the White subgroup in all programs except for internal medicine, with the Asian subgroup being higher. We observed a significant increase in both application and acceptance rates for women and racial and ethnic minorities over the past 40 years.

Cumulative Systolic Blood Pressure and Incident Stroke Type Variation by Race and Ethnicity.

Importance: Stroke risk varies by systolic blood pressure (SBP), race, and ethnicity. The association between cumulative mean SBP and incident stroke type is unclear, and whether this association differs by race and ethnicity remains unknown. Objective: To examine the association between cumulative mean SBP and first incident stroke among 3 major stroke types-ischemic stroke (IS), intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH), and subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH)-and explore how these associations vary by race and ethnicity. Design, Setting, and Participants: Individual participant data from 6 US longitudinal cohorts (January 1, 1971, to December 31, 2019) were pooled. The analysis was performed from January 1, 2022, to January 2, 2024. The median follow-up was 21.6 (IQR, 13.6-31.8) years. Exposure: Time-dependent cumulative mean SBP. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was time from baseline visit to first incident stroke. Secondary outcomes consisted of time to first incident IS, ICH, and SAH. Results: Among 40 016 participants, 38 167 who were 18 years or older at baseline with no history of stroke and at least 1 SBP measurement before the first incident stroke were included in the analysis. Of these, 54.0% were women; 25.0% were Black, 8.9% were Hispanic of any race, and 66.2% were White. The mean (SD) age at baseline was 53.4 (17.0) years and the mean (SD) SBP at baseline was 136.9 (20.4) mm Hg. A 10-mm Hg higher cumulative mean SBP was associated with a higher risk of overall stroke (hazard ratio [HR], 1.20 [95% CI, 1.18-1.23]), IS (HR, 1.20 [95% CI, 1.17-1.22]), and ICH (HR, 1.31 [95% CI, 1.25-1.38]) but not SAH (HR, 1.13 [95% CI, 0.99-1.29]; P = .06). Compared with White participants, Black participants had a higher risk of IS (HR, 1.20 [95% CI, 1.09-1.33]) and ICH (HR, 1.67 [95% CI, 1.30-2.13]) and Hispanic participants of any race had a higher risk of SAH (HR, 3.81 [95% CI, 1.29-11.22]). There was no consistent evidence that race and ethnicity modified the association of cumulative mean SBP with first incident stroke and stroke type. Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this cohort study suggest that cumulative mean SBP was associated with incident stroke type, but the associations did not differ by race and ethnicity. Culturally informed stroke prevention programs should address modifiable risk factors such as SBP along with social determinants of health and structural inequities in society.

Racial, Ethnic, and Geographic Differences in Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Delivery in the US, 2011-2021.

This cross-sectional study examines racial, ethnic, and geographic differences in vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in the US, from 2011 to 2021.

Food security status and cardiometabolic health by sex/gender and race/ethnicity among adults in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Minoritized racial/ethnic groups and women in the United States (US) are disproportionately burdened by food insecurity, which likely contributes to disparities in cardiovascular health (CVH). Disparities are projected to widen due to the worsening climate crisis that is straining the agricultural system including food supplies. Nonetheless, studies have not investigated the relationship between food security status and 'ideal' CVH in a large, nationally-representative and racially/ethnically diverse US sample. METHODS AND RESULTS: We investigated household food security status in relation to 'ideal' CVH among US adults (N = 157,001) using 2014-2018/2020 National Health Interview Survey data. Food security status was defined as very low, low, marginal, or high. A summed score of 4 health behaviors and 3 clinical factors totaling 7 different measures was dichotomized (yes/no) to assess modified 'ideal' CVH (mICVH). Using Poisson regression with robust variance, we estimated prevalence ratios (PRs) and 95% CIs of mICVH by household food security status. We stratified models by sex/gender and race/ethnicity. Very low food security prevalence was higher among non-Hispanic (NH)-Black (8.0%) compared to Hispanic/Latinx (5.1%), NH-White (3.1%) and NH-Asian (1.7%) adults. The association between very low versus high food security and mICVH was stronger among women (PR = 0.23 [95% CI: 0.17-0.31]) than men (PR = 0.48 [95% CI: 0.35-0.66]). Compared to NH-White adults with high food security, racially/ethnically minoritized groups with very low to high food security were generally less likely (range: [PRvery low = 0.25[95% CI: 0.14-0.44] - [PRhigh = 0.88 [95% CI: 0.79-0.97]) to meet mICVH criteria. CONCLUSIONS: Food insecurity was associated with lower mICVH prevalence and racially/ethnically minoritized groups were disproportionately burdened.

Racial Disparities in Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Adverse Events in Patients with Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma: A Nationwide Analysis.

Background and Objectives: Non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) has the sixth-highest malignancy-related mortality in the United States (US). However, inequalities exist in access to advanced care in specific patient populations. We aim to study the racial disparities in major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs) in NHL patients. Materials and Methods: Using ICD-10 codes, patients with NHL were identified from the US National Inpatient Sample 2016-2019 database. Baseline characteristics, comorbidities, and MACCE outcomes were studied, and results were stratified based on the patient's race. Results: Of the 777,740 patients with a diagnosis of NHL, 74.22% (577,215) were White, 9.15% (71,180) were Black, 9.39% (73,000) were Hispanic, 3.33% (25,935) were Asian/Pacific Islander, 0.36% (2855) were Native American, and 3.54% (27,555) belonged to other races. When compared to White patients, all-cause mortality (ACM) was significantly higher in Black patients (aOR 1.27, 95% CI 1.17-1.38, p < 0.001) and in Asian/Pacific Islander patients (aOR 1.27, 95% CI 1.12-1.45, p < 0.001). Sudden cardiac death was found to have a higher aOR in all racial sub-groups as compared to White patients; however, it was statistically significant in Black patients only (aOR 1.81, 95% CI 1.52-2.16, p < 0.001). Atrial fibrillation (AF) risk was significantly lower in patients who were Black, Hispanic, and of other races compared to White patients. Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) was noted to have a statistically significantly lower aOR in Black patients (0.70, 95% CI 0.60-0.81, p < 0.001), Hispanic patients (0.69, 95% CI 0.59-0.80, p < 0.001), and patients of other races (0.57, 95% CI 0.43-0.75, p < 0.001) as compared to White patients. Conclusions: Racial disparities are found in MACCEs among NHL patients, which is likely multifactorial, highlighting the need for healthcare strategies stratified by race to mitigate the increased risk of MACCEs. Further research involving possible epigenomic influences and social determinants of health contributing to poorer outcomes in Black and Asian/Pacific Islander patients with NHL is imperative.

Assessing interstate racial and socioeconomic disparities in newborn screening policies in the United States.

Introduction: This paper explores racial and socioeconomic disparities in newborn screening (NBS) policies across the United States. While inter-state inequality in healthcare policies is often considered a meaningful source of systemic inequity in healthcare outcomes, to the best of our knowledge, no research has explored racial and socioeconomic disparities in newborn screening policies based on state of residence. Methods: We investigate these disparities by calculating weighted average exposure to specific NBS tests by racial and socioeconomic group. We additionally estimate count models of the number (and type) of NBS conditions screened for by state racial and socioeconomic composition. Results: Adding to the knowledge base that social determinants of health and health disparities are linked, our analysis surprisingly reveals little evidence of substantial inter-state inequity in newborn screenings along racial and socioeconomic lines. Discussion: While there is substantial nationwide racial and socioeconomic inequity in terms of infant health, the distribution of state-level policies does not appear to be structured in a manner to be a driver of these disparities. Our findings suggest that efforts to reduce inequities in outcomes related to NBS should shift focus toward the delivery of screening results and follow-up care as discussion builds on expanding NBS to include more conditions and genomic testing.

Bias Found in Race-Based GFR Equations that Estimate Kidney Function.

According to this study: A systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrated bias in the race-based estimated glomerular filtration rate equations used for the diagnosis and management of kidney disease.A multifaceted approach is needed to mitigate racial disparities in chronic kidney disease outcomes.

Temporal trends in peripartum hysterectomy among individuals with a previous cesarean delivery by race/ethnicity in the United States: A population-based cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: Rates of severe maternal morbidity have highlighted persistent and growing racial disparities in the United States (US). We aimed to contrast temporal trends in peripartum hysterectomy by race/ethnicity and quantify the contribution of changes in maternal and obstetric factors to temporal variations in hysterectomy rates. METHODS: We conducted a population-based, retrospective study of 5,739,569 US residents with a previous cesarean delivery, using National Vital Statistics System's Natality Files (2011-2021). Individuals were stratified by self-identified race/ethnicity and classified into four periods based on year of delivery. Temporal changes in hysterectomy rates were estimated using odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We used sequential logistic regression models to quantify the contribution of maternal and obstetric factors to temporal variations in hysterectomy rates. RESULTS: Over the study period, the peripartum hysterectomy rate increased from 1.23 (2011-2013) to 1.44 (2019-2021) per 1,000 deliveries (OR 2019-2021 vs. 2011-2013 = 1.17, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.25). Hysterectomy rates varied by race/ethnicity with the highest rates among Native Hawaiian and Other Pacific Islander (NHOPI; 2.73 per 1,000 deliveries) and American Indian or Alaskan Native (AIAN; 2.67 per 1,000 deliveries) populations in 2019-2021. Unadjusted models showed a temporal increase in hysterectomy rates among AIAN (2011-2013 rate = 1.43 per 1,000 deliveries; OR 2019-2021 vs. 2011-2013 = 1.87, 95% CI 1.02 to 3.45) and White (2011-2013 rate = 1.13 per 1,000 deliveries; OR 2019-2021 vs. 2011-2013 = 1.21, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.33) populations. Adjustment ranged from having no effect among NHOPI individuals to explaining 14.0% of the observed 21.0% increase in hysterectomy rates among White individuals. CONCLUSION: Nationally, racial disparities in peripartum hysterectomy are evident. Between 2011-2021, the rate of hysterectomy increased; however, this increase was confined to AIAN and White individuals.