Efficacy of common salvage chemotherapy regimens in patients with refractory or relapsed acute myeloid leukemia: A retrospective cohort study.

To assess treatment response and overall survival (OS) in refractory or relapsed acute myeloid leukemia (R/R AML) patients treated by different common salvage chemotherapy regimens.Medical records data from 142 R/R AML patients were reviewed in this retrospective study. Patients were treated with regimens based on the following drugs: cytarabine, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), and fludarabine (FLAG) (n = 46); cytarabine and G-CSF in addition to aclarubicin or daunorubicin (CAG/DAG) (n = 30); cytarabine, G-CSF, and cladribine (CLAG) (n = 27); cytarabine, etoposide, and mitoxantrone (MEA) (n = 17); cytarabine plus idarubicin, daunorubicin, or mitoxantrone (IA/DA/MA) (n = 12); and homoharringtonine, cytarabine, and aclarubicin or daunorubicin (HAA/HAD) (n = 10).A total of 43 (35.2%) patients achieved complete remission (CR), 60 (49.2%) patients achieved overall remission rate (ORR), and 18 (14.8%) patients received allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) after CR. Median OS was 8.0 (95% CI 6.6-9.4) months with a 1-year OS rate of (29.9 ±â€Š3.9)% and 3-year OS rate of (11.1 ±â€Š3.6)%. No difference of CR (P = .621), ORR (P = .385), and allo-HSCT (P = .537) achievement was observed among different chemotherapy regimens. Interestingly, we observed that the CLAG-based regimen did not affect CR (P = .165), while it achieved a numerically higher ORR (P = .093) and was an independent factor for prolonged OS (P = .016). No other regimens were determined to be correlated with CR, ORR, or OS.FLAG-, CAG/DAG-, CLAG-, MEA-, IA/DA/MA- and HAA/HAD-based regimens were found to achieve similar CR rates, while the CLAG-based regimen achieved numerically higher ORR rates and significant favorable OS. Therefore, CLAG-based regimens should be a prioritized treatment option for R/R AML patients.

A safety evaluation of omacetaxine mepesuccinate for the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia.

INTRODUCTION: Therapy of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) has been completely transformed by the development of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). However, a subset of patients will fail TKI therapy due to resistance or intolerance. Omacetaxine mepesuccinate (OM), a protein translation inhibitor, is currently the only approved therapy that does not directly target the kinase domain. It has activity for CML patients irrespective of the phase or underlying kinase domain mutation status. AREAS COVERED: We searched the MEDLINE database for articles published in English on homoharringtonine or omacetaxine from 1970 to present. This article reviews the pharmacokinetics of OM and its clinical evolution for the treatment of CML pre- and post TKI development. Toxicity profile, drug administration and future directions are also discussed. EXPERT OPINION: OM represents a unique addition to the CML therapeutic armamentarium with its distinct mechanism of action and activity. The adverse event profile is manageable and with subcutaneous administration at the approved dose, cardiac toxicity is no longer a concern. The recent approval of home administration will facilitate access to this therapy and increase patient compliance. We conclude with specific scenarios where OM use should be considered in CP and AP-CML patients in the era of TKI therapy.

Pharmacokinetics and excretion of (14)C-omacetaxine in patients with advanced solid tumors.

Background Omacetaxine mepesuccinate is indicated in adults with chronic myeloid leukemia resistant and/or intolerant to ≥ 2 tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatments. This phase I study assessed the disposition, elimination, and safety of (14)C-omacetaxine in patients with solid tumors. Methods The study comprised a 7-days pharmacokinetic assessment followed by a treatment period of ≤ six 28-days cycles. A single subcutaneous dose of 1.25 mg/m(2) (14)C-omacetaxine was administered to six patients. Blood, urine, and feces were collected through 168 h or until radioactivity excreted within 24 h was <1 % of the dose. Total radioactivity (TRA) was measured in all matrices and concentrations of omacetaxine, 4'-desmethylhomoharringtonine (4'-DMHHT), and cephalotaxine were measured in plasma and urine. For each treatment cycle, patients received 1.25 mg/m(2) omacetaxine twice daily for 7 days. Results Mean TRA recovered was approximately 81 % of the dose, with approximately half of the radioactivity recovered in feces and half in urine. Approximately 20 % of the dose was excreted unchanged in urine; cephalotaxine (0.4 % of dose) and 4' DMHHT (9 %) were also present. Plasma concentrations of TRA were higher than the sum of omacetaxine and known metabolites, suggesting the presence of other (14)C-omacetaxine-derived compounds. Fatigue and anemia were common, consistent with the known toxicity profile of omacetaxine. Conclusion Renal and hepatic processes contribute to the elimination of (14)C-omacetaxine-derived radioactivity in cancer patients. In addition to omacetaxine and its known metabolites, other (14)C-omacetaxine-derived materials appear to be present in plasma and urine. Omacetaxine was adequately tolerated, with no new safety signals.

Incidence and management of myelosuppression in patients with chronic- and accelerated-phase chronic myeloid leukemia treated with omacetaxine mepesuccinate.

Omacetaxine mepesuccinate (Synribo) is an inhibitor of protein synthesis indicated for the treatment of patients with chronic- or accelerated-phase chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) with resistance and/or intolerance to two or more tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Myelosuppression is the most common and clinically significant toxicity experienced by patients treated with omacetaxine. Here, we further examine the patterns of hematologic toxicity observed in clinical trials and describe the approach to management as well as resolution of events. Omacetaxine-related myelosuppression typically occurs more frequently during induction cycles. In general, the myelosuppression observed with omacetaxine treatment is manageable and reversible, and long-term administration is feasible. Careful monitoring, dose delays and reduction in administration days, and appropriate supportive care are critical for successful management of hematologic toxicity. Concerns regarding myelosuppression, observed with many cancer treatments, should not prevent eligible patients from receiving omacetaxine, particularly CML patients with unsatisfactory responses to multiple lines of prior treatment.

Long-term follow-up of homoharringtonine plus all-trans retinoic acid-based induction and consolidation therapy in newly diagnosed acute promyelocytic leukemia.

We conducted a retrospective study to evaluate the efficacy of combining homoharringtonine (HHT) with all-trans-retinoic acid (ATRA)-based induction therapy, followed by three courses of consolidation chemotherapy and 2-year sequential maintenance therapy in acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL). Fifty-three patients were enrolled in the study. The complete remission (CR) rate was 100 %. No patient died during induction therapy. The 9-year event-free survival (EFS) and 9-year overall survival (OS) for all patients were 79.0 and 83.0 %, respectively. Outcome estimates according to the body mass index (BMI) were carried out. Twenty-three (43.4 %) were underweight/normal (BMI < 23.0 kg/m(2)), whereas 30 patients (56.6 %) were overweight/obese (BMI ≥ 23.0 kg/m(2)). Underweight/normal-weight patients had a 9-year OS of 100 %, compared with 73.0 % for overweight/obese patients (P = 0.044). These results indicate that HHT plus ATRA-based induction and consolidation therapy may be a highly efficacious treatment option for newly diagnosed APL. Increased BMI had an adverse prognostic impact in APL.

Final analysis of the efficacy and safety of omacetaxine mepesuccinate in patients with chronic- or accelerated-phase chronic myeloid leukemia: Results with 24 months of follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Omacetaxine, a protein synthesis inhibitor, is indicated in the United States for the treatment of patients with chronic-phase (CP) or accelerated-phase (AP) chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) with resistance and/or intolerance to 2 or more tyrosine kinase inhibitors. METHODS: The final analysis, with 24 months of follow-up, included additional efficacy and safety analyses to assess the benefit of long-term omacetaxine administration (1.25 mg/m(2) twice daily for 14 days every 28 days followed by 7 days every 28 days) in CP-CML and AP-CML patients receiving >3 cycles. RESULTS: Eighteen percent of CP-CML patients achieved a major cytogenetic response (MCyR) with a median duration of 12.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.5 months to not reached [NR]); responses were maintained for ≥12 months in 3 of 14 responders, and the median overall survival (OS) was 40.3 months (95% CI, 23.8 months to NR). Among patients with AP-CML, 14% achieved or maintained a major hematologic response for a median of 4.7 months (95% CI, 3.6 months to NR); MCyR was not achieved, and the median OS was 14.3 months (95% CI, 6.7-18.7 months). In patients with CP-CML and patients with AP-CML who received >3 cycles of treatment (n = 50 and n = 14, respectively), the median OS was 49.3 months (95% CI, 23.8 months to NR) and 24.6 months (95% CI, 12-37.2 months), respectively. Grade 3 or higher hematologic toxicities were the major side effects (79% and 73% for CP-CML and AP-CML, respectively), with discontinuation due to toxicity in 10% of CP patients and in 5% of AP patients. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that the long-term administration of omacetaxine is feasible with dose adjustments to manage toxicities and that omacetaxine provides a durable benefit for some patients.

Effectiveness of homoharringtonine (omacetaxine mepesuccinate) for treatment of acute myeloid leukemia: a meta-analysis of Chinese studies.

The present meta-analysis provides an overview on the effectiveness of homoharringtonine (HHT) combination regimens to treat acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Because most of these studies were performed in China, Chinese published clinical studies were used for the analysis. A search for studies from 2006 to 2013 of regimens containing HHT for AML treatment was performed using published studies and Chinese databases in Mandarin. The complete response (CR) and overall response (OR) rates were analyzed, and the fixed effects model and random effects model (REM) were calculated. The heterogeneity of the studies was calculated using Q homogeneity statistics. The meta-analysis included 21 studies (n = 1310, n = 229 pediatric, and n = 216 elderly). HHT was given in combination with cytarabine, daunorubicin, idarubicin, aclacinomycin, mitoxantrone, or granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. Heterogeneity was seen in all analyzed pools, but it was most pronounced in retrospective studies. Overall, the REM showed a CR rate of 65.2%. However, in studies in which HHT-containing regimens were compared to regimens without HHT, the CR rates were 69.1% in randomized trials and 62.8% in retrospective studies. Additionally, in studies with exclusively elderly patients, the CR rate was considerably lower than it was for the studies with mixed age populations (47.5% vs. 65.2%). Higher overall CR rates for HHT-containing regimens in AML treatment in the Chinese studies suggest that HHT could be an active agent in the management of AML. Additional clinical trials are warranted to evaluate the efficacy of HHT in AML treatment.

Screening of allergic components mediated by H(1)R in homoharringtonine injection through H(1)R/CMC-HPLC/MS.

It has been reported that the histamine H1 receptor (H(1)R) gene is up-regulated in patients with allergic rhinitis and H(1)R expression level strongly correlates with the severity of allergy symptoms. Drugs for therapy should avoid allergy symptoms, especially for patients with over-expressed H(1)R. Therefore, screening of the components which could induce H(1)R activation is urgently needed for drug safety evaluation. Homoharringtonine injection is a preparation for acute nonlymphocytic leukemia, which is approved by China Food and Drug Administration (CFDA) and US Food and Drug Administration. However, severely adverse reactions often occur with intravenous injection of the preparation. In present study, an H(1)R/CMC model was applied for capturing membrane retained components which could induce H(1)R activation. Retention components were enriched and analyzed by H(1)R/CMC-HPLC/MS. Homoharringtonine was recognized, separated and identified in homoharringtonine injection. Ca(2+) flux assay and p-IP3R expression founded that homoharringtonine retained by the H1 R/CMC model increased phosphorylation of IP3R and promoted cytosolic free Ca(2+) elevation in a dose-dependent manner which further verified the activity of homoharringtonine in activating the H1 R. In conclusion, homoharringtonine was screened and identified as a potential allergic factor. This provides an indication that a patient with over-expressed H1 R should be aware of possible allergic reaction when applying homoharringtonine injection.

Homoharringtonine combined with cytarabine to treat chronic myelogenous leukemia in myeloid blast crisis and its impact on bone marrow CD34+CD7+ cells.

BACKGROUND: The therapeutic response of chronic myelogenous leukemia in myeloid blast crisis (CML-MBC) is very poor. AIM: To explore the therapeutic effect of homoharringtonine (HHT) combined with cytarabine (HA regimen) on CML-MBC and its influence on bone marrow CD34+CD7+ cells. RESULTS: Thirty-four patients with CML-MBC were treated with the HA regimen and bone marrow CD34+CD7+ cells were assayed prior to and after treatment. Among 33 evaluable patients, the overall hematological response (complete/ partial hematological response and hematological improvement) was 60.1%. Seven patients (21.2%) had a cytogenetic response 12 months after treatment. In the untreated CMLMBC patients, the proportion of bone marrow CD34+CD7+ cells was much higher than in the control group (19.4 ± 7.9 vs. 4.4 ± 1.5%, p < 0.05) and decreased to 14.1 ± 7.1% (p < 0.05) after treatment. Before treatment, the proportion of CD34+CD7+ cells was lower in the patients who had a hematological response to the HA regimen than in the patients who did not respond. CONCLUSION: The HA regimen is an effective treatment for CML-MBC and CD34+CD7+ cells may be one of the valuable clinical parameters to assess treatment effectiveness.

Omacetaxine for treatment-resistant or treatment-intolerant adult chronic myeloid leukemia.

PURPOSE: The pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy, and safety of a first-in-class protein synthesis inhibitor for use in treatment-resistant chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) are reviewed. SUMMARY: Omacetaxine mepesuccinate (Synribo, Teva Pharmaceuticals) is a potent plant alkaloid isolated from Cephalotaxus (Chinese yew tree) species. It has a mechanism of action distinct from that of the standard first-line therapy for CML, tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), and has demonstrated efficacy in adult patients with chronic- or accelerated-phase CML who develop intolerance to two or more TKIs or experience multiple TKI treatment failures. Two open-label Phase II trials (combined n = 108) demonstrated that omacetaxine produced a major cytogenetic response in 18.4% of patients with chronic-phase CML and a major hematologic response in 14.3% of patients with accelerated-phase CML (median duration of reponse, 12.5 and 4.7 months, respectively). Symptom improvement or improved overall survival in omacetaxine-treated patients has not been demonstrated. In clinical trials to date, the most common grade 1-4 adverse reactions included thrombocytopenia, anemia, neutropenia, diarrhea, nausea, fatigue, and asthenia. The drug is administered subcutaneously on an intermittent schedule (14 days on, 14 days off during induction; 7 days on, 21 days off during maintenance). Research to better delineate omacetaxine's optimal role in the management of CML and other hematologic malignancies (e.g., acute myelogenic leukemia) is ongoing. CONCLUSION: Omacetaxine, a novel protein synthesis inhibitor, provides an alternative therapy for patients with CML who have experienced TKI treatment failures or are intolerant of two or more TKIs.

U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval summary: omacetaxine mepesuccinate as treatment for chronic myeloid leukemia.

On October 26, 2012, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) granted accelerated approval to omacetaxine mepesuccinate (Synribo; Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., North Wales, PA, http://www.tevausa.com) for the treatment of adult patients with chronic phase (CP) or accelerated phase (AP) chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) with resistance and/or intolerance to two or more tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). The approval was based on the FDA review of data from 111 patients with CML in CP or in AP who had received two or more prior TKIs, including imatinib. Major cytogenetic response was achieved in 18% of patients with CP, with a median response duration of 12.5 months. Major hematologic response was achieved in 14% of patients with AP, with a median response duration of 4.7 months. The FDA safety evaluation was based on submitted data from 163 patients with CP or AP CML who had received at least one dose of omacetaxine mepesuccinate. The safety evaluation was limited by the single-arm design of the clinical trials as conducted in a small number of previously treated patients. The most common (≥20%) adverse reactions of any grade in enrolled patients included thrombocytopenia, anemia, neutropenia, diarrhea, nausea, fatigue, asthenia, injection site reaction, pyrexia, and infection. The FDA concluded that omacetaxine mepesuccinate has shown activity and a favorable benefit-to-risk profile for the studied population of adult patients with CML (CP or AP) with resistance and/or intolerance to two or more TKIs. Further evidence of response durability to verify clinical benefit is pending.

Omacetaxine mepesuccinate for the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia.

Omacetaxine mepesuccinate is a protein synthesis inhibitor that causes apoptosis of chronic myeloid leukemia cells without binding to the BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase that is implicated in the pathogenesis of this disease. It has been approved for the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia in patients with resistance to two or more tyrosine kinase inhibitors and is emerging as an important agent in countering the highly resistant T315I mutation. This review will focus on the preclinical pharmacology, pharmacokinetics and clinical utility of omacetaxine mepesuccinate in the current milieu of tyrosine kinase inhibitor-dominant therapy of chronic myeloid leukemia.

Subcutaneous omacetaxine mepesuccinate in patients with chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia previously treated with 2 or more tyrosine kinase inhibitors including imatinib.

INTRODUCTION: Omacetaxine mepesuccinate (omacetaxine) is a first-in-class cephalotaxine that has demonstrated efficacy in CML. In this analysis we evaluated omacetaxine in CML patients with resistance or intolerance to 2 or more tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data were pooled from 2 phase II trials of subcutaneous omacetaxine, administered at 1.25 mg/m(2) twice daily for 14 consecutive days every 28 days until response, then for 7 days every 28 days as maintenance. Patients with resistance or intolerance to imatinib and at least 1 other approved TKI (dasatinib and/or nilotinib) were included; results for patients in chronic phase (CP) are reported here. Major cytogenetic response (MCyR) was the primary end point. RESULTS: Eighty-one patients with CML-CP (median age, 59 years; range, 26-83 years) were included in the analysis. All patients previously received imatinib, 69 (85%) previously received dasatinib, and 48 (59%) previously received nilotinib. Median omacetaxine exposure was 7.5 months (range, 0.03-38.6 months), with 13 patients ongoing. MCyR was reported in 16 patients (20%; one-sided 95% lower confidence limit, 12.8%), including 8 complete responses; median duration was 17.7 months (95% confidence interval, 4.1 months - not reached). Fifty-six patients (69%) achieved and/or maintained hematologic response for at least 8 weeks; median duration was 12.2 months (range, 8.4-26.2 months). Median failure-free and overall survival were 9.6 months and 34 months, respectively. Toxicity was mainly hematologic: the most common grade 3/4 adverse events were thrombocytopenia (67%), neutropenia (47%), and anemia (37%). CONCLUSION: Omacetaxine produced clinically meaningful responses with acceptable tolerability in patients with CML-CP previously treated with 2 or more TKIs.

A phase II open-label study of the intravenous administration of homoharringtonine in the treatment of myelodysplastic syndrome.

Homoharringtonine is an alkaloid inhibitor of protein synthesis with activity in myeloid malignancies. We report a phase II pilot study of homoharringtonine in myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Induction consisted of homoharringtonine at 2.5 mg/m(2) via continuous infusion for 7 days. Maintenance was given every 4 weeks. Nine patients were enrolled: five with refractory anaemia with excess blasts, two with refractory anaemia with excess blasts in transformation, one each with refractory anaemia and chronic myelomonocytic leukaemia respectively. Median age was 70 years (55-84) and 6 (66%) were male. Per International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) two patients were intermediate-1, five intermediate-2 and two high-risk. Median chemotherapy courses were one (1-3). One patient (11%) responded with complete haematological and cytogenetic remission after one course. Eight patients did not respond (four had stable disease, two progressed to acute leukaemia and two died during induction - from aspergillus pneumonia and intracerebral haemorrhage respectively). Grade 3/4 myelosuppression seen in 56% (5/9). Serious non-haematological toxicities included one case of grade 4 left bundle branch heart block and one grade 3 nephrotoxicity. Median time between courses was 42 days (35-72 days). In conclusion homoharringtonine might have clinical activity in some patients with MDS.

Homoharringtonine in combination with cytarabine and aclarubicin in the treatment of refractory/relapsed acute myeloid leukemia: a single-center experience.

To assess the efficacy and toxicity of HAA regimen (Homoharringtonine 4 mg/m(2)/day, days 1-3; cytarabine 150 mg/m(2)/day, days 1-7; aclarubicin 12 mg/m(2)/day, days 1-7) as a salvage therapy in the treatment of refractory and/or relapsed acute myeloid leukemia (AML), 46 patients with refractory and/or relapsed AML, median age 37 (16-65) years, participated in this clinical study. The median follow-up was 41 (10-86) months. Eighty percent of patients achieved complete remission (CR), and the first single course of re-induction HAA regimen resulted in CR rate of 76.1 %. The study protocol allowed two courses of induction. The CR rates of patients with favorable, intermediate and unfavorable cytogenetics were 90 %, 88.9 %, and 37.5 %, respectively. For all patients, the estimated 3-year overall survival (OS) rate was 42 %, and the estimated relapse free survival (RFS) at 3 years for the 36 CR cases was 49 %. The toxicities associated with HAA regimen were acceptable. HAA is a good choice in cases with refractory/relapsing AML for salvage chemotherapy, preferably with a high-efficacy and low-toxicity profile.

Phase 2 study of subcutaneous omacetaxine mepesuccinate for chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukemia patients resistant to or intolerant of tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

Omacetaxine mepesuccinate (omacetaxine) is a first-in-class cephalotaxine with a unique mode of action, independent of BCR-ABL, that has shown promising activity in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). This multicenter, noncomparative, open-label phase 2 study evaluated the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous omacetaxine in CML patients with resistance or intolerance to two or more tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs); results in patients in chronic phase are reported here. Patients received subcutaneous omacetaxine 1.25 mg/m² twice daily days 1-14 every 28 days until hematologic response (up to a maximum of six cycles), then days 1-7 every 28 days as maintenance. Primary endpoints were rates of hematologic response lasting >8 weeks and major cytogenetic response (MCyR). Forty-six patients were enrolled: all had received imatinib, 83% had received dasatinib, and 57% nilotinib. A median 4.5 cycles of omacetaxine were administered (range, 1-36). Hematologic response was achieved or maintained in 31 patients (67%); median response duration was 7.0 months. Ten patients (22%) achieved MCyR, including 2 (4%) complete cytogenetic responses. Median progression-free survival was 7.0 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 5.9-8.9 months], and overall survival was 30.1 months (95% CI, 20.3 months-not reached). Grade 3/4 hematologic toxicity included thrombocytopenia (54%), neutropenia (48%), and anemia (33%). Nonhematologic adverse events were predominantly grade 1/2 and included diarrhea (44%), nausea (30%), fatigue (24%), pyrexia (20%), headache (20%), and asthenia (20%). Subcutaneous omacetaxine may offer clinical benefit to patients with chronic-phase CML with resistance or intolerance to multiple TKI therapies.

Pharmacokinetic study of omacetaxine mepesuccinate administered subcutaneously to patients with advanced solid and hematologic tumors.

PURPOSE: Omacetaxine mepesuccinate is a first-in-class cephalotaxine demonstrating clinical activity in chronic myeloid leukemia. A subcutaneous (SC) formulation demonstrated efficacy and safety in phase 1/2 trials in patients previously treated with ≥1 tyrosine kinase inhibitor. This study assessed pharmacokinetics and safety of SC omacetaxine in patients with advanced cancers. METHODS: Omacetaxine 1.25 mg/m(2) SC was administered BID, days 1-14 every 28 days for 2 cycles, until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Blood and urine were collected to measure omacetaxine concentrations and inactive metabolites. Adverse events, including QT interval prolongation, were recorded. Tumor response was assessed at cycle 2 completion. RESULTS: Pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated from cycle 1, day 1 data in 21 patients with solid tumors or hematologic malignancies and cycle 1, day 11 data in 10 patients. Omacetaxine was rapidly absorbed, with mean peak plasma concentrations observed within 1 h, and widely distributed, as evidenced by an apparent volume of distribution of 126.8 L/m(2). Plasma concentration versus time data demonstrated biexponential decay; mean steady-state terminal half-life was 7 h. Concentrations of inactive metabolites 4'-DMHHT and cephalotaxine were approximately 10 % of omacetaxine and undetectable in most patients, respectively. Urinary excretion of unchanged omacetaxine accounted for <15 % of the dose. Grade 3/4 drug-related adverse events included thrombocytopenia (48 %) and neutropenia (33 %). Two grade 2 increases in QTc interval (>470 ms) were observed and were not correlated with omacetaxine plasma concentration. No objective responses were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Omacetaxine is well absorbed after SC administration. Therapeutic plasma concentrations were achieved with 1.25 mg/m(2) BID, supporting clinical development of this dose and schedule.

Homoharringtonine is an effective therapy for patients with polycythemia vera or essential thrombocythemia who have failed or were intolerant to hydroxycarbamide or interferon-α therapy.

BACKGROUND: At present, the treatment of polycythemia vera (PV) and essential thrombocythemia (ET) is still largely supportive and symptomatic. Homoharringtonine (HHT), a valid drug for treating chronic myelogenous leukemia, has shown some effect on leukemic stem cells. The aim of this study was to observe the effect of HHT on patients with high-risk PV and ET. METHODS: Patients with high-risk PV (n = 17) or ET (n = 18) who had failed or were intolerant to hydroxycarbamide or interferon-α therapy received HHT at a dose of 1.5 mg/m(2) daily by continuous infusion for 7 days every month. Hematological responses were evaluated at the 6th month after HHT therapy. RESULTS: After six courses of HHT therapy, the hematological response rates were 64.7 % (11/17) in PV and 72.2% (13/18) in ET. In PV, the single sign remission rates of constitutional symptoms, symptomatic splenomegaly, pruritus and bone pain were 70.0% (7/10), 77.8% (7/9), 50% (1/2) and 100% (3/3), respectively. The remission rates of constitutional symptoms and symptomatic splenomegaly in ET were 66.7% (6/9) and 71.4% (5/7), respectively. The rates of grade 1 granulocytopenia and thrombocytopenia were 1.8 and 0.9%, respectively. No grade 2 or over events, or pancytopenia were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Low-dose HHT alone has considerable short-term efficacy for high-risk PV/ET and may used as a second-line drug for PV/ET treatment in patients who have failed or were intolerant to hydroxycarbamide or interferon-α therapy.

[Clinical efficacies and safety of HAG regimen for patients with high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes: a multicentre study].

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacies and toxicity of HAG (HHT + Ara-C + G-CSF) regimen in patients with high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). METHODS: A total of 97 patients with high-risk MDS received HAG regimen as the induction therapy. RESULTS: The complete remission (CR) rate of all the patients was 52.3% (45/86). The overall response (OR) rate was 66.3% (57/86). The early mortality rate was 9.3% (9/97). There was no significant difference in CR rate and OR rate between the patients aged ≥ 60 and those < 60. The OR rate was 29/34, 9/12 and 6/13 in patients with favorable karyotype, intermediate karyotype and unfavorable karyotype respectively. The OR rate was higher in patients with favorable karyotype than those with unfavorable karyotype (P = 0.038). The major adverse effect was infection. CONCLUSION: HAG regimen provides higher CR rate and OR rate for patients with high-risk MDS.